SUMMARY
Coxiella burnetii is the agent of Q fever, or “query fever,” a zoonosis first described in Australia in 1937. Since this first description, knowledge about this pathogen and its associated infections has increased dramatically. We review here all the progress made over the last 20 years on this topic. C. burnetii is classically a strict intracellular, Gram-negative bacterium. However, a major step in the characterization of this pathogen was achieved by the establishment of its axenic culture. C. burnetii infects a wide range of animals, from arthropods to humans. The genetic determinants of virulence are now better known, thanks to the achievement of determining the genome sequences of several strains of this species and comparative genomic analyses. Q fever can be found worldwide, but the epidemiological features of this disease vary according to the geographic area considered, including situations where it is endemic or hyperendemic, and the occurrence of large epidemic outbreaks. In recent years, a major breakthrough in the understanding of the natural history of human infection with C. burnetii was the breaking of the old dichotomy between “acute” and “chronic” Q fever. The clinical presentation of C. burnetii infection depends on both the virulence of the infecting C. burnetii strain and specific risks factors in the infected patient. Moreover, no persistent infection can exist without a focus of infection. This paradigm change should allow better diagnosis and management of primary infection and long-term complications in patients with C. burnetii infection.
KEYWORDS: Coxiella burnetii, diagnosis, Q fever, treatment, epidemiology, genomics
INTRODUCTION
Qfever has long been considered a rare and regionally restricted disease. In recent years, spectacular advances have been made in the knowledge of this disease and its causative agent, Coxiella burnetii. First, the worldwide role of Coxiella burnetii as a cause of endocarditis has been recognized in most countries performing systematic serology. Moreover, the classification of C. burnetii by the CDC as a potential bioterrorism agent resulted in the disease becoming reportable in many countries, such as in the United States, which revealed that the disease is more common than previously thought. Third, the recent war in the Middle East (1) and research in the tropics (2, 3) have shown that Q fever may be a very common cause of fever in the intertropical area. Finally, a very large outbreak in the Netherlands has shown that this disease could become a major public health problem (4).
Furthermore, knowledge about Coxiella burnetii has evolved, with the sequencing of multiple genomes of bacterial strains and their culture in axenic medium. This breakthrough enables genetic transformation and opens a new era. Moreover, redefining the clinical forms of Q fever is necessary, because of a lack of consensus on the distinction between acute Q fever and chronic Q fever (5). This redefinition, by more precisely qualifying the different clinical forms of the disease, will improve the exchange of medical and scientific knowledge about the disease throughout the world.
SEARCH STRATEGY
We searched in Medline and Google scholar for references with no language restriction and no restriction of publication status, using the key words “Coxiella burnetii” OR “Q fever” AND the other key words “diagnosis, treatment, epidemiology, human, animal, pathophysiology, chronic, acute.” We applied no time restriction. This search yielded 12,887 references. We removed duplicates and assessed the remaining references for eligibility. Finally, 687 references were included in the qualitative analysis. Data were collected and extracted from the selected studies and synthesized in the appropriate section.
MICROBIOLOGY
The Bacterium
C. burnetii has a cell wall similar to that of Gram-negative bacteria. However, this small coccobacillus (0.2 to 0.4 μm wide and 0.4 to 1 μm long) is not stainable with the Gram technique. The Gimenez method is used to stain C. burnetii isolated in culture or directly in clinical samples (6). The estimated doubling time of the bacterium is between 20 and 45 h in in vitro cell culture (7). It is an intracellular pathogen, replicating in eukaryotic cells. Its vacuole of replication progressively acquires phagolysosome-like characteristics, such as an acidic pH, acid hydrolysates, and cationic peptides (8). The bacterium actively participates in the genesis of this intracellular vacuole and has several strategies for adaptation to this exceptionally stressful environment. First, C. burnetii encodes an important number of basic proteins that are probably involved in the buffering of the acidic environment of the phagolysosome-like vacuole (9). Also, four sodium-proton exchangers and transporters for osmoprotectants are found in the C. burnetii genome, allowing this bacterium to confront osmotic and oxidative stresses.
Two forms of this microorganism can be observed, corresponding to a biphasic developmental cycle. The large-cell variant (LCV) of the bacterium is an exponentially replicating form, whereas the small-cell variant (SCV) is a stationary nonreplicating form (10). SCVs are small rods (0.2 to 0.5 μm long) characterized by condensed chromatin, a thick envelope, and an unusual internal membrane system. LCVs have a larger size (>0.5 μm), a dispersed chromatin, and an envelope similar to that of classical Gram-negative bacteria. SCVs are typical of the stationary phase. They are observed after prolonged culture (21 days) in Vero cells and in axenic acidified cysteine citrate medium 2 (ACCM2) (11). SCVs are stable in the environment and are highly resistant to osmotic, mechanical, chemical, heat, and desiccation stresses. These properties led to the adoption of a high temperature (71.7°C) for pasteurization in the 1950s (12). The transcriptome analysis of the SCV has revealed upregulated genes involved in the oxidative stress response, cell wall remodeling, and arginine acquisition (10). Also, SCVs show an unusually high number of cross-links in their peptidoglycan, which probably are involved in their exceptional environmental resistance (10). They can survive for 7 to 10 months on wool at ambient temperature, for more than 1 month on fresh meat, and for more than 40 months in milk (7). Although the SCVs are destroyed by 2% formaldehyde, they have been isolated from tissues stored in formaldehyde for 4 to 5 months (7). The high virulence of C. burnetii, the possibility of its aerosolization, and its environmental stability and have led the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to classify this bacterium as a category B biological threat agent. A bioterrorism attack with this pathogen, although not associated with the high death rates observed for class A agents, could cause significant disability and possibly long-term consequences due to persistent infection in the population.
Antibiotic Susceptibility and the Role of pH
Methods for AST.
For years, the antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) of C. burnetii was difficult, owing to the obligate intracellular lifestyle of this bacterium. Antibiotic activity was evaluated first in animal models, then in embryonated-egg models and finally in cell culture systems. Inoculation in guinea pigs was used for susceptibility testing of streptomycin in early studies (13). The embryonated-egg method involved the ability of the tested antibiotic to prolong the survival time of the embryo in eggs infected with C. burnetii. This method was used in old studies to test the activities of streptomycin, chloramphenicol, oxytetracycline, and aureomycin against C. burnetii (14).
Cell culture systems were then implemented and remain the reference method for C. burnetii AST. In 1987, Yeaman et al. used C. burnetii-infected L929 fibroblast cells and compared the percentage of infected cells (after Gimenez staining of bacteria) in antibiotic-treated cultures to that in drug-free controls (15). The more convenient shell vial assay was then developed, using specific antibodies and the immunofluorescence assay for detection of intracellular C. burnetii (16–18). In 2003, Brennan and Samuel developed a variant of the shell vial assay by using quantitative PCR (qPCR) for determination of C. burnetii intracellular counts (19). This method was found to be more repeatable and likely more sensitive than the indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) (19). It was then applied in another study from our team, which confirmed its excellent reproducibility for MIC determination (20). In recent years, both the IFA and qPCR tests targeting com1 or apoB have been used for C. burnetii AST in various eukaryotic cell lines (21–24). We recently developed a new method using flow cytometry and specific immunofluorescent probes. This technique allows a very sensitive counting of C. burnetii cells because of specific morphological characteristics (25).
Main susceptibility features.
Doxycycline is the most effective drug against C. burnetii, with MICs of <2 mg/liter in most reports (21, 23, 25). However, strains with acquired resistance to doxycycline have been described and represent a worrisome situation. The first resistant strain was isolated from a patient who died from C. burnetii endocarditis. The doxycycline MIC was 8 mg/liter, as determined using the shell vial assay and qPCR (26). In the same study, Rolain et al. found a correlation between the ratio of serum concentration to MIC for doxycycline and the rate of decline of anti-C. burnetii antibody titers in patients with C. burnetii endocarditis. For 16 C. burnetii strains isolated from cardiac valves removed from endocarditis patients, a ratio of serum concentration to MIC of >1 correlated with a rapid decline in specific antibody titers. A ratio between 0.5 and 1 was associated with a slower reduction in antibody titers. The only patient who died from endocarditis had a ratio of <0.5 (26). The whole genome of the C. burnetii strain infecting that patient (Cb109) was determined, but no specific sequence could be correlated with doxycycline resistance (27). Since then, two other isolates have been found to be resistant to doxycycline, including one goat isolate and another human isolate from a patient with acute Q fever (28).
In early studies, the fluoroquinolones were found to be one of the most effective agents in eliminating C. burnetii from L929 cells (15, 29). For that reason, in 1989 it was proposed to combine doxycycline with a fluoroquinolone to treat persistent forms of C. burnetii infection (30). Fluoroquinolones are also recommended for treatment of acute meningitis caused by C. burnetii because of the good cerebrospinal fluid penetration of these drugs (31). Pefloxacin- or ciprofloxacin-resistant strains of C. burnetii have been selected in vitro by Spyridaki et al. and Musso et al., with MICs up to 64 mg/liter (32, 33). These authors identified point mutations in the gyrA gene that could allow PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) detection of these resistant strains (32). However, to date, clinical isolates of C. burnetii remain susceptible to levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and to a lesser extent ciprofloxacin (12, 13, 16, 20).
Erythromycin was proposed as an empirical treatment for C. burnetii pneumonia. However, in 1991, Raoult et al. found that 6 of 13 clinical isolates of C. burnetii were resistant to this antibiotic (16), and such resistance was more recently observed in 6 isolates from Cayenne, French Guiana (11, 20). Conversely, clarithromycin was found to be active, with MICs between 2 and 4 mg/liter (12, 13). For azithromycin, higher MICs, up to 8 mg/liter, have been observed (16, 20). Telithromycin was considered active against C. burnetii, with MICs between 0.5 and 2 mg/liter for 13 clinical isolates (28). However, we recently isolated a strain from French Guiana which was resistant to this antibiotic (25).
No resistance to sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim has been reported to date, suggesting that this agent is useful during pregnancy. Anecdotal reports observed susceptibility to tigecycline and linezolid and proposed them as alternative agents (13, 18). Unsworth et al. recently reported susceptibility of C. burnetii to antimicrobial peptides (24). Other nonantibiotic agents have been reported to display in vitro activity against C. burnetii. Lovastatin and pentamidine can inhibit C. burnetii growth in vitro (683, 684). Also, omeprazole is effective in reducing the size of C. burnetii intracellular vacuoles (34).
Role of pH in persistent infection.
The antibiotic treatment of persistent C. burnetii infection has long been challenging, because no antibiotic has displayed a bactericidal effect. In 1990, it was demonstrated that the acidic environment of the phagolysosome-like vacuole where C. burnetii multiplies inhibited antibiotic activity. The acidification of the C. burnetii replication vacuole was stable over time for the three strains tested in an in vitro persistent cell infection model (35). For that reason, Raoult et al. combined alkalinizing agents with doxycycline and observed a restoration of the bactericidal effect of doxycycline (36). Among alkalinizing agents, chloroquine and amantadine were used, and doxycycline was the antibiotic for which restoration of the bactericidal activity was the highest. These results were subsequently confirmed clinically by comparing the outcomes of patients with C. burnetii endocarditis treated with the combination of either doxycycline plus a fluoroquinolone or doxycycline plus hydroxychloroquine. Patients who benefited from the latter combination had a shorter duration of treatment and less frequent relapses (37).
Recent Advances in Culture Techniques
For years, the strict intracellular nature of C. burnetii had been an experimental obstacle, with time-consuming culture methods. Our laboratory developed an empirical medium based on Vero cell extract (VCEM) that allows host cell-free cultivation of C. burnetii (38). However, adding fresh medium every 48 h was necessary to sustain C. burnetii growth, and to date no growth has been obtained on the solid agarose-VCEM (38).
Another axenic medium, called acidified cysteine citrate medium 2 (ACCM2), was developed. First, Omsland et al. in 2008 elaborated a complex Coxiella medium (CCM) composed of an acidic citrate buffer and a mixture of three complex nutrient sources (neopeptone, fetal bovine serum, and RPMI medium) (39). This composition was based on an in silico genomic analysis of metabolic deficiencies. The authors observed sustained metabolic activity of C. burnetii in this medium, which was measured with [35S]Cys-Met incorporation (39). Other metabolic requirements were then analyzed using transcriptomic microarray, genomic reconstruction, and metabolite typing. This work led to the formulation of ACCM2, a medium with an acidic pH incubated in a 2.5% oxygen atmosphere. This medium allowed a substantial growth of about 3 logs of C. burnetii after 7 days of incubation. Microcolonies of C. burnetii were observed on solid agar plates (40). This medium was subsequently improved by adding methyl-β-cyclodextrin. An increased growth of 4 to 5 logs was obtained at day 7, and an easier isolation from animal tissue and genetic transformation was achieved with solid ACCM2 (41).
EPIDEMIOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF C. BURNETII INFECTION
Overview
Q fever cases have been reported almost everywhere they have been sought, except in New Zealand. The main reservoirs of C. burnetii are cattle, sheep, and goats. However, in recent years, an increasing number of animals have been reported to shed the bacterium, including domestic mammals, marine mammals, reptiles, ticks, and birds (42). Birth products contain the highest concentration of bacteria, but C. burnetii is also found in urine, feces, and milk of infected animals (7, 43, 44). Transmission to humans is most frequently due to inhalation of aerosolized bacteria that are spread in the environment by infected animals after delivery or abortion.
Because Q fever is a zoonosis, with only anecdotal reports of human-to-human transmission, the epidemiology of human infections always reflects the circulation of the bacterium in animal reservoirs. The prevalence of Q fever is highly variable from one country to another, due to epidemiological disparities and whether or not the disease is reportable. For example, Q fever became a reportable disease only in 1999 in the United States, which led to an increase of 250% in the number of human cases between 2000 and 2004 due to better recognition of cases (45). Depending on the geographic area, endemic or outbreak situations are observed. In areas of endemicity, Q fever occurs as sporadic cases, usually after identifiable at-risk activities (farming, slaughterhouse work, or rural tourism). This is the predominant presentation in France, Spain, and the United States. In these countries some hyperendemic foci also can be identified, as in Martigues, a city in southeastern France, where the Q fever incidence rate reaches 34.5/100,000 inhabitants due to dissemination of spores by the local mistral wind from sheep herds breeding in the local plains (46). Small outbreaks (especially familial outbreaks) may occur after exposure to a common source, such as C. burnetii-infected parturient pets such as dogs or cats (47, 48). Also, an anecdotal outbreak was recently reported in the United States in five patients, due to intramuscular injection of fetal sheep cells by a German doctor practicing “live cell therapy,” a xenotransplantation practice with no published evidence of efficacy (49).
Finally, large-scale outbreaks can occur at a country level, which happened in the Netherlands between 2007 and 2010, with more than 4000 reported cases. In the following section, we detail three of the most striking epidemiological profiles observed in recent years; the hyperendemicity situation in Africa, the major outbreak in the Netherlands, and the epidemic in Cayenne, French Guiana, associated with unique virulence and reservoir features.
The Different Epidemiological Profiles
Q fever in Africa.
In 1955, Kaplan and Bertagna reported the first cases of Q fever in nine African countries, from Morocco to South Africa, suggesting that the infection was widespread in that continent (50). Seroprevalence studies then revealed the highest seropositivity rates in Mali, Burkina Faso, Nigeria, and Central African Republic, which are countries with the highest density of domestic ruminants (>100 per 100 inhabitants) (51). Q fever seroprevalence rates in humans varied from 1% in Chad (52) to 16% in Egypt (53). More recently, a seroprevalence study among blood donors in Namibia identified a 26% seropositivity rate (54). In an agropastoral region of Algeria, seroprevalence rates of 15%, with peaks up to 30% in villages where the disease is hyperendemic, have been observed (55). In Senegal, 24.5% of the population tested seropositive for C. burnetii in a rural village, and the bacterium was detected by PCR in 6 of 511 febrile patients (2, 56).
Because there are no easy diagnostic tools available in most African countries, the global impact of Q fever on public health has largely been underestimated. In a recent study, C. burnetii was found as the etiological agent in 5% of 109 severe pneumonia cases in Tanzania (57). In the same country, an investigation in a cohort of severely ill febrile patients found 26.2% zoonoses, among which 30% were Q fever (58). In Tunisia and Algeria, C. burnetii accounts for 1 to 3% of infective endocarditis (59). In Burkina Faso, Q fever is responsible for 5% of acute febrile illnesses (59). In Cameroon, 9% of community-acquired pneumonia in those aged >15 tested positive for C. burnetii (59). In that country, C. burnetii was the third most frequent agent of pneumonia, after Streptococcus pneumoniae and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (60). These studies may be the tip of the iceberg, indicating widespread circulation of the bacterium in rural Africa.
Moreover, in most African countries, seroprevalence rates are elevated in domestic ruminants. Surveys in cattle showed rates ranging from 4% in Senegal to 55% in Nigeria (61, 62). In Egypt, a high rate of 33% seropositivity was observed in sheep herds (63). Goat seropositivity for C. burnetii ranged from 13% in Chad to 23% in Egypt. Also, Schelling et al. found 80% of camels with C. burnetii seropositivity (52), and a similar rate of 70% was found in Egypt (64), suggesting that these animals are significant reservoirs of the disease. In rural regions of most of these countries, human households are in close vicinity to domestic ruminants, making transmission easier than it is elsewhere. As a consequence, C. burnetii DNA was detected in 2% to 22% of household samples in rural Senegal (65), which correlated with the prevalence of Q fever cases in the population. Consumption of unpasteurized raw milk may be a source of human contamination, as C. burnetii has been detected in up to 63% of cattle milk samples in Nigeria (59). A few C. burnetii genotypes (including genotypes 2, 6, 16, 19, 30, 35, 36, and 52) have been characterized in Africa, mainly in ticks (56, 66). Only genotypes 19 and 35 have been detected so far in humans (56).
Q fever is not commonly considered a tropical disease. Clinicians should think of this diagnosis in febrile patients coming back from African countries. The fact that it has been reported in travelers returning from a safari tour illustrates this aspect (67).
Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands.
Between 2007 and 2010, the Netherlands faced the largest Q fever outbreak ever reported, with more than 4,000 reported cases and an estimation of probably more than 40,000 total cases (4, 68, 69). The outbreak occurred in a population with low previous Q fever seroprevalence (2.4%) (70). The regions with the highest rates of infection were the Noord-Brabant province in the southern part of the country and the provinces of Gelderland and Limburg (71). Noord-Brabant province has 2.4 million inhabitants and 6.4 million farm animals, and goat farming is concentrated in this region. The outbreak correlated with the development of intense dairy goat farming in proximity to urban areas (72). The importation of a huge number of animals, with a 75-fold increase in the goat population between 1985 and 2009, could have contributed to the introduction of C. burnetii-infected animals in this country (4). Thanks to a retrospective study, it is now known that the epizooty had begun in 2005, with abortion rates above 60% on some farms (73). Thus, the combination of a large number of infected animals, the location of farms near populated areas, a lack of surveillance, and the low level of immune protection in this population probably explain the magnitude of the Q fever epidemic.
A public health strategy for controlling the outbreak had to be developed by Dutch authorities and was implemented in the spring of 2008. The notification of abortion cases in herds and vaccination became mandatory in June 2008 for goat or sheep farms with more than 50 animals in affected areas (74). Due to the inefficiency of these measures, and while fatal cases in humans were being reported, it was decided in December 2009 to systematically cull gestating goats and ewes, leading to the culling of more than 50,000 goats (75). In 2010, the number of reported cases in humans began to decrease, probably due to these veterinary measures and to increasing the immunization of the population.
As a consequence of the epidemic, many patients with underlying cardiac valve (or vascular) defects or prostheses could have been exposed to C. burnetii and might develop life-threatening endocarditis or vascular infections (76–78). Also, a high number of pregnant women could have been exposed to C. burnetii and might develop obstetrical complications and spontaneous abortions (79). Therefore, the long-term public health consequences of the Q fever epidemic, especially the potential development of a high number of persistent infections, are still a major concern.
This exceptional outbreak highlights that despite the microbiological knowledge about C. burnetii infection, its sudden emergence and spread cannot be predicted.
Hyperendemic Q fever in Cayenne, French Guiana.
In Cayenne, the capital city of French Guiana, C. burnetii causes 24% of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), which is the highest prevalence ever reported in the world (80). The first Q fever case was reported in 1955 in Cayenne, in a slaughterhouse worker (81). Sporadic cases were then reported in the following 4 decades. In the 1990s, a dramatic increase in the incidence of Q fever was observed, with seroprevalence rates rising from 2% in 1992 to 24% in 1996 in a cohort of febrile patients (3). The same year, a patient died of respiratory distress syndrome due to acute Q fever (82). The incidence continued to rise, with up to 150 cases per 100,000 inhabitants in 2005 (3). The majority of cases (81%) occurred in the Cayenne area and its suburbs, in contrast with the usual rural distribution of the disease. However, a more sensitive analysis of the incidence found a heterogenous distribution, with seven areas of high incidence. In these areas, rainforest hills are near houses (83). Living near the forest and seeing wild animals (bats or marsupials) around the house were risk factors for Q fever (82). No classical at-risk exposure was found in acute Q fever cases in Cayenne. Low Q fever seroprevalence was found in cattle, sheep, and goats, as well as in tested pets (82). In an initial study performed by Gardon et al., no significant seroprevalence was observed among wild mammals and arthropods, so that no reservoir was identified (82). In a recent study, C. burnetii was detected by qPCR in the ticks, spleen, and stools of a dead three-toed sloth in Cayenne (84). In addition, the incidence of acute Q fever in Cayenne is correlated with the rainy season, and we observed a 1- to 2-month lag in the correlation between the incidence of acute Q fever and the number of births of three-toed sloths in Cayenne (85). Also, a retrospective study of an outbreak in a military camp in Cayenne in 2013 found that having carried a three-toed sloth in the arms in the month preceding symptoms was an independent risk factor for acute Q fever (unpublished data).
The same study found that 100% of cases (defined by a positive serology and/or qPCR in blood) in this military camp were symptomatic, which is an exceptional feature compared to the usual rate of 60% symptomatic cases found in most areas of endemicity. Clinically, the pneumonias caused by C. burnetii in Cayenne show a more severe initial presentation, with more frequent headaches, chills, and night sweats than pneumonia caused by other microorganisms (80). Moreover, patients tend to exhibit higher levels of phase I IgG, despite the acute presentation. These atypical features seem to be correlated with the presence of a single clone of C. burnetii, MST 17, which to date has only been isolated from this area. This clone also appears to be more virulent in animal models (see Pathophysiology section below).
The Reservoirs
Coxiella burnetii can infect a broad range of vertebrate and invertebrate hosts (86–88). Also, the bacterium can persist for prolonged periods in the environment, owing to a pseudosporulation process. Among mammals, cattle, sheep, and goats are the most frequent reservoir leading to human transmission. However, wildlife can also constitute a reservoir, as illustrated by an acute Q fever case reported after contact with kangaroos and wallabies in Australia (89) or by the involvement of the three-toed sloth in Cayenne (84). C. burnetii has also been isolated in many tick species, suggesting that these arthropods play a role in the transmission of the bacterium. Finally, it has been shown that C. burnetii is able to grow within amoebae, suggesting a participation of these hosts in the environmental persistence of the bacterium.
Domestic ruminants.
Since domestic ruminants are the main reservoir responsible for human outbreaks, the detection and control of infected herds are important issues. However, the identification of infected animals is challenging, because dairy animals can shed the bacterium without being symptomatic. The main clinical manifestations in ruminants are reproductive disorders such as infertility, stillbirth, abortion, endometritis, and mastitis (87). Increased abortion rates in infected caprine herds have been described, with up to 90% abortions in pregnant animals (90). Infected females shed a huge amount of bacteria in birth products and in urine, feces, and milk. This shedding can persist for several months in vaginal mucus, feces, and milk (91). In nonpregnant animals, C. burnetii infection is most frequently asymptomatic.
Rodolakis et al. have compared the shedding of C. burnetii in bovine, caprine, and ovine herds from France (44). Cows were mostly asymptomatic and shed C. burnetii mainly in milk, with a few of them (5%) shedding in vaginal mucus. Ovine flocks were the most heavily infected, with shedding of the bacterium in feces, vaginal mucus, and milk, and ewes shed the bacterium for up to 2 months of follow-up. Goats shed the bacterium mainly in milk, and a minority shed C. burnetii in vaginal mucus or feces (44). These differences in shedding routes could explain why human outbreaks are most frequently related to small ruminants rather than to bovine herds, which is what was observed in the Netherlands. Interestingly, in the same study, seropositivity for C. burnetii was not strongly correlated with shedding of the bacterium. Fewer than 10% of ovine flocks shedding C. burnetii tested positive for C. burnetii antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and the proportions were 35% and 50% for bovine and caprine herds, respectively (44). As a consequence, serology does not seem to be an efficient tool in estimating the real rate of contamination of herds. For monitoring purposes, PCR testing of bulk tank milk is a useful method to detect shedding of C. burnetii at the farm level (92).
Preventive veterinary measures are a key point in the control of Q fever. Antibiotic treatment with oxytetracycline (20 mg/kg) during the last months of pregnancy has been proposed to reduce abortion rates and C. burnetii shedding in pregnant animals (93). However, this strategy is not always effective, since Astobiza et al. found no difference in rates of bacterial shedding between treated and untreated sheep (94).
Vaccination is another available option to decrease abortion rates and spread of the infection. The phase I vaccine Coxevac has been effective in decreasing abortion rates and bacterial load in vaginal mucus, feces, and milk in goats (95). The vaccination should be administered in noninfected ruminants before their first pregnancy (74). When ruminants are already infected, vaccination cannot prevent abortion (90, 96). Also, standard hygiene measures should be taken to prevent dissemination of C. burnetii in the environment and between animals. Infected parturient females should be isolated from the herd, and placentas and fetuses should be collected and destroyed by burning or burying (90). Moreover, the spreading of manure in infected farms should be avoided during windy conditions. Animals exhibited at fairs should also be carefully selected. In Germany, an infected ewe lambing in a farmer's market led to an outbreak of 299 Q fever cases in the people present (97). In Briançon, a town in France located in the Alps, the investigation of a slaughterhouse-related outbreak found that contamination resulted from airborne transmission of contaminated sheep waste, facilitated by the wind caused by a nearby heliport (98, 99). Finally, when no preventive measures can be applied and if too many contaminated animals are involved, culling of herds is the ultimate solution, and this was performed in the Netherlands to control the epidemic (90).
The main routes of introduction of C. burnetii on a farm are the aerosolized spore-like forms transported by the wind (100) and the introduction of an infected animal. Then, depending on the size and immune status of the herd, the spread of the bacterium can lead to “abortion storms,” such as what occurred in the Netherlands in 2005 and 2009 (90).
Role of ticks.
C. burnetii strains were first isolated from hard ticks: Dermacentor andersoni (Nine Mile isolate) collected in Montana (101) and Haemaphysalis humerosa from Australia (102). Hematophagy is the essential factor for the acquisition of C. burnetii by arthropods. Following the ”classical“ epidemiological pattern of zoonotic infections, C. burnetii likely circulates among animals with the help of hematophagous arthropod vectors. However, in contrast to the case for most vector-borne diseases, the presence of an arthropod vector is not necessary for the transmission of the infectious agent from the reservoir to host mammals.
Another important aspect of the epizootic cycle of C. burnetii is the absence of any vector specificity. This bacterium was isolated from more than 40 hard tick species, at least 14 soft tick species, and many other arthropods, including bed bugs, flies, and mites (Table 1). Even more arthropod species (including human lice and fleas) were shown to be susceptible to C. burnetii infection under experimental conditions (103), although they were not able to transmit the agent to experimental animals or to their progeny.
TABLE 1.
Arthropod species from which strain was isolated | Host(s) | Reference(s) |
---|---|---|
Hard ticks (Ixodidae) | ||
Amblyomma americanum | Deer, cattle | 103 |
Amblyomma cajennense | Dogs | 670 |
Amblyomma flavomaculatum | Monitors | 103, 671 |
Amblyomma nuttalli | Reptiles | 103, 671 |
Amblyomma paulopunctatum | Suidae | 103, 671 |
Amblyomma splendidum | Ungulates | 103, 671 |
Amblyomma triguttatum | Kangaroos | 672 |
Amblyomma variegatum | Cattle | 103, 109, 671 |
Dermacentor andersoni | Deer, cattle | 673 |
Dermacentor marginatus | Deer, cattle | (186) |
Dermacentor nuttalli | Ruminants | (186) |
Dermacentor occidentalis | Deer, cattle | 103 |
Dermacentor silvarum | Deer, cattle | (186) |
Haemaphysalis bispinosa | Kangaroos | 674 |
Haemaphysalis humerosa | Marsupial bandicoot | 102 |
Haemaphysalis leachi | Dogs | 103, 671 |
Haemaphysalis leporis-palustris | Hares | 103 |
Haemaphysalis punctata | Rodents | 103, 186 |
Hyalomma asiaticum | Ruminants | 104, 675 |
Hyalomma anatolicum | Cattle | 104 |
Hyalomma marginatum | Cattle | 103, 671 |
Hyalomma detritum | Ruminants | 103, 104 |
Hyalomma dromedarii | Camels | 103, 104 |
Hyalomma excavatum | Cattle | 103 |
Hyalomma lusitanicum | Horses | 103 |
Hyalomma plumbeum | Cattle | 103, 108 |
Hyalomma scupense | Cattle | 104 |
Ixodes crenulatus | Weasels | 104 |
Ixodes dentatus | Rodents, rabbits | 103 |
Ixodes frontalis | Birds | 104 |
Ixodes holocyclus | Dogs, rodents | 674 |
Ixodes lividus | Birds | 104 |
Ixodes persulcatus | Ruminants | 104, 676 |
Ixodes redikorzevi | Argali | 677 |
Ixodes ricinus | Ruminants | 23, 103 |
Ixodes trianguliceps | Rodents | 104 |
Rhipicephalus annulatus | Cattle | 104 |
Rhipicephalus bursa | Cattle | 103, 108 |
Rhipicephalus cuspidatus | Aardvarks | 103, 671 |
Rhipicephalus decoloratus | Cattle | 103, 671 |
Rhipicephalus sanguineus | Dogs | 671, 678 |
Rhipicephalus simus | Carnivores | 103, 671 |
Rhipicephalus turanicus | Ruminants | 104 |
Soft ticks (Argasidae) | ||
Argas persicus | Birds | 104, 671 |
Argas reflexus | Birds | 104 |
Argas vespertilionis | Bats | 679 |
Ornithodoros alactagalis | Rodents | 104 |
Ornithodoros erraticus | Rodents | 103 |
Ornithodoros gurneyi | Kangaroos | 105 |
Ornithodoros hermsi | 680 | |
Ornithodoros lahorensis | 103 | |
Ornithodoros moubata | 103, 113, 680 | |
Ornithodoros papillipes | 679 | |
Ornithodoros sonrai | Rodents, insectivores | 56 |
Ornithodoros tartakovskyi | Rodents | 679 |
Ornithodoros turicata | 110 | |
Otobius megnini | Horses, cattle | 103 |
Other arthropods | ||
Musca domestica | 103, 186 | |
Cimex lectularius | Humans | 186, 681 |
Hematophagous Mesostigmata mites: at least 14 species, including Liponyssoides sanguineus, Ornithonyssus bacoti, Haemolaelaps glasgowi, Dermanyssus hirundinis, and Haemogamasus nidi | Rodents | 104, 186, 682 |
(i) Susceptibility of arthropods.
Hematophagous arthropods at all stages of their development can be easily infected with C. burnetii when taking a blood meal from an infected mammal (104). However, in experimental situations, not all ticks feeding on a C. burnetii-infected animal become infected; e.g., in the case of a Haemaphysalis humerosa infection model, only half of the ticks became infected (102, 105). A similar situation was described for the experimental infection of Ixodes ricinus and Ornithodoros papillipes ticks fed on infected guinea pigs (104).
(ii) Localization inside the tick.
The first experiments on the localization and dissemination of C. burnetii in ticks were performed by D. J. W. Smith on Haemaphysalis humerosa and Haemaphysalis bispinosa (105, 106). Bacteria were abundant in the epithelial cells and lumen of the gut. However, the transovarial transmission of C. burnetii was reported for H. humerosa, suggesting that these ticks could serve as a long-time reservoir for this pathogen. Using an Ornithodoros moubata model, von Weyer later showed the generalized dissemination of C. burnetii in this tick's body, affecting the gut, hemocytes, salivary glands, and ovaries (107). Tarasevich, working on Haemaphysalis plumbeum ticks infected intracoelomically with C. burnetii, demonstrated that this bacterium was visible in hemocytes for several hours postinfection and was detectable in salivary glands and ovaries from the third day postinfection (108). Similar data were observed in different experiments on Dermacentor nuttalli, Haemaphysalis asiaticum, and Ornithodoros papillipes (103, 104).
(iii) Survival of C. burnetii in ticks.
It is clear that C. burnetii, once infecting tick cells, is capable of remaining viable inside the tick's body for a very long time, between 200 (109) and 1,000 days, depending on the tick species (110). However, in several cases, much longer survival times have been reported: 1,301 days in O. moubata (107) and even 6 to 10 years in O. papillipes (104). Low temperatures, starvation, and feeding on an immunized host do not influence the viability of C. burnetii (104).
(iv) Transstadial and transovarial transmission.
Most soft and hard ticks transmit C. burnetii transstadially in 100% of cases (104). Similarly, it is thought that most hard and soft ticks are able to transmit C. burnetii transovarially. Several exceptions include Ixodes holocyclus, Ornithodoros hermsi, and Ornithodoros turicata (104). However, transovarial transmission is not very effective and may vary from 30 to 60% (102, 104, 107).
(v) Excretion of C. burnetii.
Massive excretion of highly infective phase I C. burnetii (11) in tick feces occurs on the skin of the animal host at feeding time. This is the direct consequence of the multiplication of C. burnetii primarily inside gut epithelial cells. Feces may contain a huge number of bacteria, from 103 to 108 in different experiments (102, 104, 106, 111). Excreted bacteria stay viable in tick feces for many days (up to 635), although infectivity decreases with time (104). As for other bacteria excreted in arthropod feces, abraded skin may serve as a portal of entry for infection (112).
Soft ticks may also excrete C. burnetii in coxal fluid (6, 20). This may even be the most important method of C. burnetii excretion for soft ticks with no direct connection between the rectum and the midgut, such as in O. moubata (113).
(vi) C. burnetii influence on tick fitness.
No deleterious effects of C. burnetii in ticks has been reported (104). Slight metabolic changes between infected and noninfected ticks, such as oxygen consumption and CO2 excretion, have been noted. C. burnetii infection is considered to be harmless to ticks (104).
In livestock, ticks are probably nonessential for transmission of C. burnetii (103). However, they seem to play a role in the transmission of C. burnetii among other vertebrates (rodents, wild birds, and lagomorphs) (103, 114).
Detection and strain isolation of C. burnetii from bed bugs, lice, and flies (Table 1) (103) have been reported, but the role of these arthropods in the natural cycle of C. burnetii is unknown.
Role of free-living amoebae.
C. burnetii is an intracellular bacterium that multiplies in monocytes and macrophages of infected hosts (115). Prokaryotes colonized Earth before eukaryotes, and unicellular eukaryotes emerged before multicellular ones. It has been emphasized that most intracellular bacteria infecting humans and animals are able to multiply within unicellular protozoa such as amoebae (116). Because these protozoa are widespread in nature, many bacteria have developed mechanisms to resist the phagosomal pathway of amoebae. These microorganisms have then used similar mechanisms to resist attack by the phagocytic cells of multicellular eukaryotes. Legionella pneumophila, the agent of legionellosis, is a paradigm for such an adaptive evolution (117). This bacterium can multiply in the vegetative form of amoebae. Under deleterious environmental conditions, L. pneumophila survives in encysted amoebae until they recover their vegetative form. Thus, amoebae allow long-term persistence of L. pneumophila in water and soil environments. In vitro, C. burnetii can multiply in amoebae, which may represent a long-term environmental reservoir for this bacterium (118). A report from Amitai et al. (119, 120) of a Q fever outbreak in an Israeli school occurring after exposure to an air conditioning system favored such a hypothesis. However, further studies are needed to isolate C. burnetii-infected amoebae from the natural environment.
Routes of Human Infection
A single study of experimental infection with C. burnetii in human volunteers was performed in 1950 in Portugal (121). This very old work is interesting because it summarizes the main possible routes of human infection. Fifty-one human volunteers took part in the experiment. Ten volunteers had intranasal inoculation, 11 ate infected food, and 29 were infected intradermally. The most efficient route of infection was intradermal inoculation, which resulted in 100% seroconversion. Three patients (27%) seroconverted after consumption of infected food and two patients (20%) after intranasal inoculation.
Aerosols.
Most human infections occur after inhalation of infected aerosols of C. burnetii (86–88). Infection may occur after direct exposure to infected animals and their products (placenta, abortion products, hides, wool, manure, etc.), especially at the time of parturition or slaughtering (49–51). Because C. burnetii may persist for prolonged periods in the soil, these aerosols may also be produced long after the release of bacteria by infected animals. Moreover, bacterial aerosols can be delivered for at least 30 km by the wind (122), resulting in Q fever cases far away from the primary contaminated areas. Thus, Q fever cases are often diagnosed in persons with no recent contact with animals.
Digestive route.
The hypothesis that consumption of dairy products from C. burnetii-infected animals can lead to foodborne Q fever in humans is controversial (91). In an early study, Huebner and Jellison found that pasteurization of dairy products could eliminate C. burnetii from infected milk (123). Other studies have shown higher seroprevalence rates and clinical disease in patients consuming raw milk (124). However, a significant bias of these studies is that people consuming raw milk may live more frequently in rural areas and be in contact with ruminants, so that contamination could also be the result of aerosol inhalation. However, during an epidemic in Newfoundland, Canada, eating pasteurized goat cheese was an independent risk factor for acute Q fever (125). Also, in an old study performed in a prison, C. burnetii serology was found to be more frequently positive in persons consuming raw milk than in persons who did not (126). Conversely, no seroconversion or clinical illness was observed in another study involving 34 volunteers consuming raw milk (127). C. burnetii DNA has been detected in up to 64% of dairy products in France (124) and more frequently in cow dairy products. However, no viable bacteria could be isolated from cheese and yogurt in that study. Consequently, even if the digestive route of contamination does not constitute a major public health threat, it may play a significant role in C. burnetii transmission.
Ticks.
Although this mode of contamination has not been proven in humans, ticks may play a role in the transmission of C. burnetii infection. This is illustrated by the detection of C. burnetii coinfection with other arthropod-borne pathogens in ticks. In Italy, 85 Rhipicephalus turanicus and 33 Ixodes ricinus ticks were collected from a public park in Rome (128). Coinfection with Rickettsia of the spotted fever group and C. burnetii was observed in 5 (5%) R. turanicus ticks. Double infection with C. burnetii and Borrelia burgdorferi was detected in 7 (21%) of I. ricinus ticks, and a positive statistically significant correlation between these two pathogens was observed. These findings of different microorganisms in ticks from urban areas suggest a common mode of transmission for both human pathogens via arthropods (128).
Human-to-human transmission.
Q fever pneumonia is considered a noncommunicable disease, although a recent case of respiratory nosocomial spread was reported (129). Anecdotal cases of human-to-human transmission through infected aerosols have been reported after autopsies (88). Birth products from infected parturient women are also a source of infection in obstetrical wards. A case of C. burnetii pneumonia was diagnosed in an obstetrician 7 days after he delivered the infant of an infected woman (130). Also, nosocomial transmission between two pregnant women sharing the same room has been reported (131). In this case, the most probable route of infection was vaginally excreted aerosolized infectious particles.
C. burnetii infection through transfusion of blood collected from Q fever patients with bacteremia is plausible, since the bacterium can survive in stored human blood samples (132). In the Netherlands, screening of blood donors after the outbreak found 4.4% of donors with positive phase II antibodies (133). Another study found that during the outbreak, the probability of a donor being infected was estimated at 260/100,000 donors (134). As a consequence, systematic donor screening was the most useful strategy for reducing the risk of transmission through blood transfusion. A single case of Q fever was also reported after bone marrow transplantation (135). Another anecdotal case of possible sexual transmission of C. burnetii from a farmer to his wife has been reported (136).
Seasonality Patterns and the Role of Wind
In areas of endemicity, the Q fever incidence is variable through the year. Seasonal patterns have been observed. In the southeast of France, Tissot-Dupont et al. found a correlation between the incidence of the disease, sheep densities, and the local mistral wind in the city of Martigues (46). During the winter in 1998 to 1999, the high incidence of acute Q fever in this region was associated with an increased frequency of mistral wind shortly after the lambing season, 1 month before disease onset (122). In the UK, unusual wind speed from the south was observed shortly before a large epidemic in Birmingham (137). In Germany, a long-term survey on Q fever has revealed a changing pattern of seasonality, from winter-spring to spring-summer (138). This evolution is probably due to changes in sheep husbandry. Winter-spring lambing is associated with a type of nomadic husbandry that has considerably decreased throughout the years in this country. In Croatia, acute Q fever cases have been observed mainly in the spring.
In tropical areas, two examples suggest that acute Q fever incidence may be related to the rainy season. In Queensland, Australia, a clear seasonal peak of acute Q fever cases was observed in May, 3 months after a peak February rainfall (139). In Australia, the rainy season corresponds to an increase in the populations of macropods (wallabies and kangaroos) and other wildlife that potentially plays a role in the spread of the bacterium. Rates of up to 20.8% seroprevalence for C. burnetii have been observed in macropods (140). In Cayenne, acute Q fever incidence is the highest in July, with a 2-month correlation following a peak in rainfall in May, which is the breeding season of the three-toed sloth, which is a probable wild reservoir of the infection (85).
GENOMIC ASPECTS
The first genome of C. burnetii was sequenced in 2003 (9). This event led to significant progress in many fields of study of this bacterium. In particular, the intracellular nature of C. burnetii made the search for virulence determinants very difficult. Genomics, and more particularly comparative genomics studies, have demonstrated that the word “Q fever” covers a large range of epidemiological and pathogenicity characteristics, depending mainly upon the genetic characteristics of the C. burnetii strain involved.
Comparative Genomics and Pangenomic Analysis
The RSA493 strain, isolated from a tick in 1935, was the first strain to be sequenced (9). It revealed a QpH1 plasmid (37,393 bp) and a 1,995,275-bp chromosome. When comparing this genome with genomes from close relatives, including Legionella, Chlamydia, and Rickettsia species, several particularities were found. There were 719 hypothetical coding sequences, with no equivalent in gammaproteobacteria. There were more coding sequences than in the genomes of Rickettsia prowazekii and Mycobacterium leprae. The C. burnetii genome exhibited 83 pseudogenes, showing that genome reduction was in progress. It was also characterized by the presence of 29 insertion sequence (IS) elements, in favor of high genomic plasticity.
Regarding metabolic pathways, the C. burnetii genome contained a high number of transporters, reflecting the intracellular lifestyle of the bacterium, which finds its organic nutrients within the eukaryotic host cell. In comparison with other intracellular bacteria, the central carbon metabolism and bioenergetics pathways were mainly intact. Also, many ionic exchangers were present, playing a role in the survival of the bacterium by detoxifying the phagolysosome-like vacuole where C. burnetii multiplies. Many genes were very similar to eukaryotic genes, with no equivalent in prokaryotes, similar to what has been found in Legionella. Also, a new family of ankyrin repeat-containing proteins (Anks) was reported. Anks are mediators in protein-protein interactions and play a role in intracellular processes (141).
Since 2003, six new whole genomes of C. burnetii have become available in GenBank (142–144). Sixteen incomplete genomes can also be found (27, 47, 145–150). In 2009, Beare et al. performed a comparative genomic analysis of four strains and found a total of 125 pseudogenes, of which 65 were highly conserved, and 8 IS families (142). These features were consistent with genome reduction due to recent adaptation of C. burnetii to an intracellular lifestyle. More recently, D'Amato et al. performed a pangenomic analysis of the seven sequenced strains of C. burnetii (144). The Dugway strain exhibited the largest genome (2,158,758-bp chromosome and 54,179-bp QpDG plasmid). Cb175 from Cayenne, French Guiana, had the smallest genome, due to a unique 6,105-bp deletion in the coding region for the type 1 secretion system (T1SS) (1,989,565 bp chromosome, 37,398 bp QpH1 plasmid). Some strains had one of the plasmids QpRS, QpH1, and QpDV. The others had plasmid sequences integrated into the chromosome. A BLAST score ratio (BSR) analysis allowed the description of core accessory and unique genes. The core genome/pangenome ratio was 96%. A total of 13,542 core genes (shared by all strains), 498 accessory genes (found in some strains), and 88 unique genes (found in a single strain) were found (144). Seventy-four unique genes were found in the Dugway strain, 13 in the Q212 strain, and a single gene in the RSA331 strain.
The conclusion from this work is that C. burnetii strains share strong genomic similarity, with a closed pangenome. However, some particularities were observed regarding two epidemic strains, reflecting the links between genomic characteristics and virulence.
Genome and virulence.
(i) Cb 175, a strain from Cayenne, French Guiana.
The genome sequencing of strain Cb 175, isolated from a patient with endocarditis living in Cayenne, French Guiana, revealed an unexpected feature: a deletion of 6,105 bp resulting in a large genome reduction compared to the Nine Mile strain (139). A specific qPCR system was established with primers and probes targeting DNA sequences adjacent to the deleted region. This qPCR test was positive for all other clinical strains isolated from French Guiana. Conversely, this deletion was not found in any of the 298 C. burnetii isolates from other parts of the world (8/8 versus 0/298; P < 0.001). Alignment of the missing region with the genome of Legionella pneumophila revealed the presence of a conserved region of a type 1 secretion system (T1SS). Interestingly, the genes lssB and lssD, which were absent in Cb175, were also missing in Legionella longbeachae (144).
Several conclusions can be drawn from this study. First, genome reduction has been observed in many highly epidemic strains (151). For species like Rickettsia or Mycobacterium spp., hyperpathogenicity is driven by deletion of nonvirulence genes rather than by acquisition of virulence factors (152, 153). Cb175 and other strains of the genotype MST 17 specific for French Guiana are the most virulent strains ever described. They cause the highest prevalence of community-acquired pneumonia in the world. Consequently, the observed genome reduction is probably a mechanism leading to increased virulence in this C. burnetii clone. Also, it has been shown that highly pathogenic species have fewer secretion system proteins than their nonepidemic relatives (154). The fact that the deletion in Cb175 is located in the region of genes involved in the T1SS is consistent with this phenomenon. The role of T1SS in C. burnetii is not known, but it plays a role in the internalization of Legionella pneumophila in its host cell (155). The exact pathophysiological consequences of the genetic deletion observed in both L. longbeachae and C. burnetii are currently unknown, and further experimental studies are warranted.
(ii) Strain Z3055, a strain close to the strain of the Netherlands outbreak.
To date, the complete genome sequence of NL-Limburg, the strain causing the Netherlands outbreak is not available (150). Therefore, we sequenced the Z3055 strain isolated from a German ewe, which belonged to the same genotype (MST 33) as NL-Limburg (150). Compared with other C. burnetii genomes available in GenBank, we found a high proportion of mutations in genes coding for ankyrin repeat domain proteins, membrane proteins, and proteins involved in translation and transcription (143). Thus, we hypothesized that these mutations may have changed surface antigens, as in the case of influenza virus. These modifications in surface antigens could have led to an absence of immune recognition in a naive population, allowing the rapid spread of this specific clone in the Netherlands.
(iii) Strain DOG UTAD, from Canada.
The majority of strains isolated so far in Canada belong to the MST 21 genotype. An interesting feature of Q fever outbreaks in Canada is the frequent exposure of patients to parturient pets (cats or dogs) (48, 156, 157). In 1994, three members of the same family had acute Q fever after assisting with the parturition of their dog in Nova Scotia (48). The whole genome of the strain isolated from this outbreak was sequenced. It was very close to the Q212 strain, which had been isolated from a patient with C. burnetii endocarditis in Canada. DOG UTAD was plasmidless and showed 70 mutations, of which 47 were nonsynonymous compared to Q212. Both strains belong to the same genotype, MST 21, which has been isolated only in Canada to date (47).
(iv) Plasmids and virulence.
A correlation between plasmid types and virulence was proposed previously. In this hypothesis, strains with a QpH1 plasmid were associated with “acute Q fever” and strains harboring QpRS were associated with “chronic Q fever” (158). The substratum for such a hypothesis was that specific sequences in plasmids correlated with pathogenicity. For example, the gene cbbE′ was found to be specific for QpRS, and cbhE′ was found to be specific for QpH1 (159, 160). However, this hypothesis was ruled out by several studies. First, Stein and Raoult showed that cbhE′ was not systematically detected in strains from “acute Q fever” and conversely could be detected in isolates from chronic Q fever (161). The description of a new plasmid type, named QpDV, which can be associated with both forms of the disease, has been another argument against the existence of plasmid pathotypes (162). Finally, Thiele and Willems also found endocarditis isolates harboring QpH1 sequences (163). Nevertheless, in a recent study, Angelakis et al. found that the QpDV plasmid was associated with strains causing abortion (164). However, this correlation could be related to the confounding factor represented by genotype, so further studies are needed to confirm this point.
C. burnetii genotyping.
Genotyping of bacteria is a key tool in the understanding of the epidemiology of infectious diseases. With regard to a zoonosis like Q fever, it is of tremendous importance, helping to find the animal source of human outbreaks. In initial studies, 16S rRNA sequencing, 16S-23S rRNA sequencing, RNA polymerase β-subunit (rpoB) sequencing, and internal transcribed spacer (ITS) sequencing were used as epidemiological markers but showed insufficient discriminant power for C. burnetii genotyping (165). Then, restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) analysis and PCR-RFLP targeting several genes were developed, but these methods could not be used on a routine basis (165). Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH), thanks to whole-genome microarray techniques, was performed when genome sequences became available. Different “genomotypes” were defined based on polymorphisms in plasmid open reading frames (ORFs) and chromosomal sequences (166), but this method is time-consuming. Loftis et al. have tried to describe the diversity of strains by detection of different plasmid sequences, but this has a poor discriminant power (167). Currently, the three main discriminant genotyping methods used are multiple-locus variable-number tandem repeat (VNTR) analysis (MLVA), multispacer sequence typing (MST), and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotyping.
(i) VNTR-MLVA genotyping.
VNTR-MLVA genotyping was established by Svraka et al., who amplified VNTR sequences from 21 C. burnetii isolates (168). They identified five main clusters and nine MLVA types. Arricau-Bouvery et al. then analyzed 42 isolates and found 36 MLVA types. They proposed using two panels of markers to have a better discriminatory power (169). In the literature, there are 17 references for studies that have used this genotyping method, almost all from Europe and mainly among ruminants (66, 73, 170–184). The clone causing the Netherlands outbreak was identified as CbNL01 using this method, and a very similar clone was detected in goats in Belgium (178). However, MLVA is based on the analysis of relatively unstable repetitive DNA elements and can produce results that are too discriminatory (185). Moreover, it significantly lacks interlaboratory reproducibility (185).
(ii) MST genotyping and “geotyping.”
MST genotyping was introduced by Glazunova et al., who identified 10 highly variable spacers located between ORFs (186). This typing method identified 30 different genotypes and three monophyletic groups among 173 C. burnetii isolates. These groups were partially correlated with plasmid types. The first group contained strains with the QpDV or QpRS plasmid, the second contained only strains with the QpH1 plasmid, and the third group contained plasmidless strains or strains with QpH1. This method is very discriminant and has been used most frequently in different studies around the world. Seventeen studies have used MST genotyping from human, animal, or environmental C. burnetii strains (2, 56, 66, 84, 164, 172, 173, 176, 179, 183, 184, 186–191), providing a worldwide database allowing interlaboratory comparison (Fig. 1). MST genotyping helps to trace the spread of C. burnetii from one region to another and from animal reservoirs to humans. Some MSTs are present across the five continents, whereas others are very specific to epidemic situations. For example, MST 20 has been described in ruminants in Europe and in humans and ruminants in the United States, suggesting a spread of the disease by infected animals historically brought to the New World. In contrast, MST 17 has been isolated only from French Guiana to date, causing severe forms of the disease (192). In the Netherlands, MST genotyping identified MST 33 in goats and humans, allowing confirmation that the source of the epidemic was goat herds rather than cow herds, which predominantly harbored MST20 (176). The phylogenetic analysis showed that MST 33 may have spread from Germany to the Netherlands via France.
For these reasons, MST genotyping has been qualified as a “geotyping method” (Fig. 1). This “geotyping” scheme is still incomplete and has to be implemented in further studies to provide a comprehensive cartography of the genetic diversity of C. burnetii.
(iii) SNP genotyping.
SNP genotyping was developed by a Dutch team during the outbreak in the Netherlands to provide a method directly applicable to animal and human samples without the need for enrichment by a culture step (193). Ten discriminatory SNPs were selected using five C. burnetii whole-genome sequences available in GenBank. (RSA493, RSA331, CbuG_Q212, Cbuk_Q154, and Dugway). Detection of SNPs by reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) was performed in 14 human and 26 animal samples, allowing identification of five different genotypes. This method has also been used in Belgium and in the United States for livestock and tick strains (178, 194–196). Karlsson et al. developed an SNP genotyping method targeting 10 phylogenetically stable synonymous canonical SNPs (canSNPs) (197). Finally, Hornstra et al. developed an SNP method derived from MST genotyping (189). They extracted SNP signatures in MST loci and designed 14 SNP-base assays. These assays allowed genotyping of 43 previously untyped isolates when using classic MST, increasing the database available for worldwide comparison of “geotypes” (Fig. 1).
(iv) Other methods.
Some other genotyping methods have been reported on the basis of small samples, giving very local information. In Spain, Jado et al. developed a genotyping method based on the detection of seven ORFs and on the presence or not of the acute disease antigen A (adaA) (198). They identified seven genomic groups and 10 different genotypes among 90 samples from ruminants and humans. In that study, sheep, wild boars, goats, ticks, and rats shared common genotypes with humans, while cattle harbored a different one (198). In France, Sidi-Boumedine et al. used the randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) method for genotyping of 10 isolates from goats, sheep, and cows (199). This method was more discriminant than the MLVA method among these strains.
Phylogenetic Aspects
Historically, C. burnetii was considered a member of the Rickettsiaceae family in the class of Alphaproteobacteria. Actually, the sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene has shown that it is a member of the Gammaproteobacteria, close to Rickettsiella grylli and Legionella pneumophila (200) (Fig. 2). For years, C. burnetii was the only species of the Coxiella genus, so that phylogenetic studies were not accurate. However, comparison with some close genera revealed interesting features. Like Legionella, C. burnetii can survive in amoebae (118). C. burnetii has a sterol-delta-reductase gene very similar to that of Legionella drancourtii. This gene is eukaryotic and is not present in other close relatives (118, 201). This suggests horizontal gene transfer between these two bacteria within the amoeba (201). Similarly, nontuberculous mycobacteria that can live in amoebae have a pyridine nucleotide disulfide oxidoreductase (pyr-redox) very close to that of C. burnetii (202).
Coxiella cheraxi, another member of the genus, was described in 2000, showing 95.5% similarity with C. burnetii in 16S rRNA (203). To date, its genome sequence is still not available. The most recent advances in the description of C. burnetii phylogeny have resulted from the study of Coxiella-like endosymbionts from ticks (204–207). These microorganisms have been identified mainly thanks to 16S rRNA sequencing. A Coxiella-like endosymbiont from the tick Amblyomma americanum (CLEAA) has been studied by Smith et al. (204). CLEAA is phylogenetically closely related to C. burnetii but has a reduced genome and does not seem to derive from it. These two species are both derived from a probable common ancestor (204). Recently, the phylogenetic analysis of a third species, the Coxiella-like symbiont of Rhipicephalus turanicus ticks (CRt), suggested that it also shares the same common ancestor (207). However, compared to these two other species, the genome of C. burnetii shows a high number of unique genes, suggesting gene gain events in its lineage (207). A deeper analysis among Coxiella-like tick endosymbionts has been performed by Duron et al. (205). They combined a new multilocus typing method and whole-genome sequencing for the phylogenetic analysis of Coxiella-like DNA from 637 specimens of ticks. They found a high diversity of Coxiella-like organisms, which could be divided in four clades (A to D) (Fig. 3). These Coxiella-like microorganisms were widely distributed among the different tick species, suggesting a long coevolution of Coxiella and ticks. This work also revealed that C. burnetii belonged to a unique subclade within clade A of Coxiella-like endosymbionts associated with soft ticks. Thus, C. burnetii has probably recently emerged from a tick-borne ancestor.
The genomes of Coxiella-like organisms are small (0.7 and 1.7 Mbp) (207). All known genomes of C. burnetii are larger (2.0 to 2.1 Mbp) than genomes of Coxiella-like organisms. Thus, it has been proposed that C. burnetii recently evolved to vertebrate pathogenicity from an inherited endosymbiont of ticks, due to spontaneous mutations or horizontal gene transfers from pathogens that coinfected the same tick or vertebrate host (205, 206). We recently detected a new Coxiella-like species, “Candidatus Coxiella massiliensis,” from ticks and skin biopsy specimens of patients presenting with eschars and SENLAT (scalp eschar and neck lymphadenopathy after tick bite). This microorganism may be one of the etiological agents of this syndrome. Further studies are needed to know if “Candidatus Coxiella massiliensis” is a representative agent of the evolution from tick endosymbiont to human pathogen (208).
Genetic Transformation
The first genetic transformation experiment with C. burnetii was achieved in 1996 by Suhan et al. (209). Before that, the same authors performed cloning in Escherichia coli to identify an autonomous replicating sequence (ARS) of 403 bp (210). This sequence was used to transform C. burnetii to ampicillin resistance. The transformation was successfully achieved by using a plasmid containing the ARS and a ColE1-type replicon encoding beta-lactamase, which was introduced with electroporation (209). Some years later, Lukacova et al. proposed improving the technique by adding a green fluorescent protein as a marker of transformation (211). Then, in 2009, Beare et al. reported the first defined gene mutation obtained with the Himar transposon system inserted in the gene for FtsZ, a protein critical for cell division (212). However, at that time the absence of an axenic medium made the procedure very cumbersome, requiring 8 to 12 weeks to obtain mutants. The elaboration of the axenic medium ACCM2, allowing host cell-free growth of C. burnetii, has been a real breakthrough in this domain. Thanks to axenic culture, Omsland et al. reduced the time to obtain transformants to 16 days: 4 days for transformant recovery in ACCM2 and 12 days for colony development and expansion (41). Recently, Beare et al. reported two methods of targeted gene deletion in C. burnetii grown axenically. They used a Cre-lox-mediated or a loop-in/loop-out system for recombination and deletion (213). These two systems were used for the deletion of dotA and dotB, which are genes involved in the T4SS. Both strategies used a sacB-mediated sucrose counterselection to select for mutants (sacB produces an enzyme that converts sucrose to levans, which are toxic for most Gram-negative bacteria). Both systems were successful in producing dotA and dotB mutants, which presented a significant lack of intracellular replication owing to failure in the production of the intracellular vacuole. These new possibilities of targeted gene deletion will significantly improve the understanding of C. burnetii virulence mechanisms. Putative virulence and nonvirulence genes will be easily knocked out because of genetic transformation.
PATHOPHYSIOLOGY
Role of the Strain in Virulence
Primary infection.
(i) Comparison of strain virulence in animal models.
Since the 1960s, several animal models, including mice, guinea pigs, and anecdotally rabbits and nonhuman primates, have been used to describe C. burnetii pathogenicity (214–220). However, none of these models is able to mimic the disease observed in humans. Murine rodents are poorly susceptible to C. burnetii infection, and consequently a high dose of this bacterium is necessary to induce organ lesions. The A/J mouse strain was described as the strain most sensitive to C. burnetii infection, with a higher mortality rate than BALB/c and C57L/6 mice (221, 222). It has been considered the best mouse model to evaluate the immune response to C. burnetii infection and vaccine efficacy (221). BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice showed minimal and transient signs of infection and no deaths. They were considered resistant to C. burnetii infection. In contrast, severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) and nude mice present durable and severe signs of the disease and even die. The 50% lethal dose of C. burnetii Nine Mile strain in SCID mice was 108 lower than that in BALB/c mice, making SCID mice the model of choice to study the virulence of this bacterium (223). Clinical signs of discomfort, bacterial burden, and histological findings were stronger and occurred earlier in SCID mice than in A/J, BALB/c, and CB57BL/6 mice (86, 224). Nude mice or athymic mice are useful models for evaluating the role of cell-mediated immunity in the host defense against Q fever (225). Interleukin-10 (IL-10) transgenic mice, which constitutively overexpress IL-10 in their macrophage cells, are used to study persistent C. burnetii infection (226, 227). Guinea pigs are globally most susceptible to Q fever, which represents a life-threatening disease in these animals. They are used to study C. burnetii virulence, dissemination, and persistent infection (223, 228, 229). Rabbits were anecdotally used to study the ability of the Priscilla and Nine Mile strains to induce endocarditis (217). Finally, the nonhuman primate model of cynomolgus monkeys showed a C. burnetii infection very close to that observed in humans. These animals were used to study C. burnetii vaccine efficacy (219, 220, 224).
The pathogenicity and virulence of C. burnetii depend on the infected animal species, the route of infection, the C. burnetii strain, and the inoculum size (186). The first experiments were performed using intraperitoneal inoculation of C. burnetii, which led to a short incubation time and diffuse infection (230). Using intranasal injection and aerosolization routes, organ lesions were observed 7 days after infection and involved mainly the lungs, with lower systemic spread of bacteria. Since then, aerosolization of C. burnetii, which better mimics the natural route of infection, has become the reference method to induce C. burnetii infection in animals for pathogenicity studies (231–233).
The bacterium's virulence includes its capacity to induce clinical symptoms such as fever, splenomegaly, and death. Early studies have compared the pathogenicity of the Nine Mile phase I and the Priscilla phase I strains of C. burnetii, which present different phase I lipopolysaccharides (LPSs) (217). Intraperitoneal inoculation of C. burnetii in guinea pigs showed that an inoculum of fewer than 4 organisms of the Nine Mile phase I was sufficient to induce seroconversion and fever, whereas more than 105 bacteria of the Priscilla strain were necessary to induce fever (234). The lower virulence of the Priscilla strain in comparison to the Nine Mile strain was then confirmed by Kazar et al. in BALB/c mice and guinea pigs infected via the intraperitoneal route (235). Using aerosolization in guinea pigs and SCID mice to compare the pathogenicities of 8 C. burnetii strains from four phylogenetic groups, Russel-Lodrigue et al. confirmed that the Priscilla strain was less virulent than the Nine Mile strain, as evidenced by a delayed onset of symptoms, a slower progression of the disease, and a lower bacterial load in the spleens in animals infected with the former strain (223). In contrast to data obtained in humans, the Priscilla strain was not associated with a higher risk of endocarditis, probably because host factors such as preexisting valvulopathy were not considered in this work. However, these last results correlated with previous studies of Q fever endocarditis in rabbits, showing that the Priscilla strain did not induce more cardiac lesions than the Nine Mile strain (217, 236). Comparing the Nine Mile RSA493 strain to 8 other isolates (African RSA334, Ohio 314RSA270, MSU Goat Q177, P Q172, G Q212, S Q217, and Dugway 5J108-111), Russel-Lodrigue et al. showed that the Nine Mile strain was the most virulent (223). Nine Mile strain pathogenicity has been widely investigated in mouse models, but none have compared its virulence with those of C. burnetii epidemic strains. We recently compared the virulence of the C. burnetii French Guiana and Netherlands-like strains to the referent Nine Mile strain using SCID and BALB/c mice. The Netherlands-like strain was isolated in 1992 in Germany from a ewe placenta and displayed the same MST33 genotype as the one responsible for the Netherlands outbreaks (143). We first noted that SCID mice infected with the French Guiana strain presented more severe signs of infection, with up to 20% weight loss at day 28 postinfection, whereas symptoms appeared later with the Netherlands-like and the Nine Mile strains (237; C. Melenotte et al., presented at the ESCCAR International Congress on Rickettsia and Other Intracellular Bacteria, 13 to 16 June 2015, Lausanne, Switzerland). Spleen weights and bacterial loads were significantly higher and histological lesions appeared earlier in mice infected with the French Guiana and the Netherlands-like strains than in those infected with the Nine Mile strain. Finally, the serological response was exacerbated with the Guiana and the Netherlands-like strains, which corroborated data obtained in humans (238). This in vivo model highlights the higher virulence of the two epidemic strains, Guiana and Netherlands-like, than of the Nine Mile strain. The French Guiana strain was found to be the most virulent, followed by the Netherlands-like strain, which displayed intermediate virulence potential between those of the French Guinea and the Nine Mile strains.
(ii) Role of secretion systems in virulence.
The sequenced genome of C. burnetii (Nine Mile RSA493) revealed the presence of several genes encoding adhesion, invasion, detoxification, and secretion system proteins (9). Interestingly, genes encoding components (IcmT, IcmS, and IcmK) of a type IV secretion system (T4SS), which are mechanistically related to the Legionella Dot/Icm apparatus (239), may contribute to the formation of the C. burnetii-containing vacuole (240, 241). The propagation of in axenic (host cell-free) culture (38, 41) has opened a technique for the genetic manipulation of this bacterium. The manipulation of an avirulent strain of C. burnetii and screening of the C. burnetii DNA library for genes encoding protein effectors have highlighted the fact that the C. burnetii Dot/Icm T4SS is involved in the establishment of a mature C. burnetii-containing vacuole and thus in intracellular multiplication of this pathogen (240, 241). However, such results could not be extrapolated to virulent strains. More recently, the importance of secretion systems in C. burnetii virulence was unraveled using the virulent C. burnetii 175 strain causing Q fever cases in Cayenne, French Guiana. The authors suggested that the virulence of the C. burnetii 175 strain is related to the loss of the type 1 secretion system (T1SS) encoded by the hlyCABD operon and thus to a genome reduction event (144).
Persistent infection.
(i) LPS.
The genetic diversity and virulence potential of C. burnetii strains are related to the expression of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS). C. burnetii displays LPS antigenic variations. The phase I infective form of C. burnetii is isolated from patients with Q fever. The avirulent form, known as phase II bacteria, is obtained following long-term in vitro propagation of C. burnetii in cell cultures (86). This leads to an irreversible modification of the LPS, with a progressive decrease in its molecular weight, up to a severely truncated LPS (rough form), owing to a genomic deletion (86). Lipid A of the LPSs from virulent and avirulent C. burnetii strains displays the same ionic species and fragmentation profiles, suggesting that it has a very similar structure in both types of strains (242). The major difference between the LPSs of virulent and avirulent C. burnetii strains resides in the core sugar, since the O antigen is missing in the LPS of the latter strains. The LPS of virulent strains (but not that of avirulent strains) contains sugars such as virenose, dihydrohydroxystreptose, and galactosamine uronyl-(1,6)-glucosamine (243). Interestingly, an intermediate-length LPS has been characterized at the surface of the Nile Mile Crazy strain (244), due to a large chromosomal deletion eliminating open reading frames involved in the biosynthesis of O-antigen sugars, including the rare sugar virenose (245).
(ii) Other virulence factors.
Adhesion genes encode an RGD motif or proteins containing ankyrin repeats (9). Interestingly, the eukaryotic cell receptor for C. burnetii is an integrin αvβ3, which interacts with the RGD motif (246). Genes encoding invasion proteins are similar to those engaged in cytoskeleton reorganization and uptake of L. pneumophila and enteropathogenic Escherichia coli by host cells. These genes probably play a role in the different levels of uptake of virulent and avirulent C. burnetii strains (246) and cytoskeleton reorganization observed during cell infection by C. burnetii (247). Detoxification genes encode superoxide dismutase, catalase, and acid phosphatase. These enzymes have been described as allowing C. burnetii to escape from the microbicidal activity of macrophages due to the detoxification of reactive oxygen intermediates produced by the host cells (248, 249). In addition, in the C. burnetii genome, a gene coding for a peptidyl-poly-cis-trans-isomerase has been identified, similar to those expressed by L. pneumophila. It has been suggested that peptidyl-poly-cis-trans-isomerase may interfere with cytokine production and consequently with the replication of C. burnetii (250).
Role of the Host
Immunological response and phase variation.
Humans develop primary C. burnetii infection that is symptomatic in fewer than half of cases. The primary infection almost always resolves without antibiotics, suggesting that the host immune response is sufficient to control C. burnetii infection (251). The host defense relies on systemic cell-mediated immunity involving innate and adaptive partners of the immune response. One of the main features of the immune response is the formation of a granuloma under the control of gamma interferon (IFN-γ). Granulomas are characterized by an accumulation of immune cells around a central open space and limited by a fibrin ring, which led to the definition of a doughnut granuloma. They are rich in macrophages with different levels of maturation, including epithelioid cells and multinucleated giant cells (252, 253). The presence of neutrophils in granulomas suggests that these cells are involved in the defense against C. burnetii, as recently demonstrated in neutrophil-depleted mice (254).
These granulomas have a microbicidal activity against C. burnetii, since they are paucibacillary during Q fever infection (251). The presence of neutrophils in Q fever granulomas suggests that these cells play a role in the defense against C. burnetii. Incubation of beads coated with C. burnetii phase I or II with mononuclear cells allowed us to investigate the mechanisms of granuloma formation in C. burnetii infection. First, phase II C. burnetii was less efficient than phase I microorganisms in inducing granuloma formation; second, monocytes were more critical than lymphocytes in granuloma formation; and third, granulomatous cells exhibited a transcriptional program that clustered with that of IFN-γ-stimulated macrophages, which are known to be a canonical model of microbicidal cells (255, 256).
The formation of granulomas in naive patients underlines the role of myeloid cells in the initial interaction of C. burnetii with innate immune cells. There is an exhaustive literature, including our contributions, which shows monocytes and macrophages to be major targets of C. burnetii. This bacterium binds to αvβ3 integrin expressed by myeloid cells and induces their activation, as assessed by remodeling of the cytoskeleton, signal signaling activation, and production of a large cytokine panel (246, 251). There is also a certain level of polarization of monocytes and macrophages after they have encountered C. burnetii. Resting monocytes that allow bacterial survival without replication exhibit an M1-type program similar to that induced by IFN-γ. C. burnetii replicates in macrophages and induces an M2-related program similar to that induced by IL-4 or IL-10 (257).
Dendritic cells (DCs) are specialized in antigen presentation to T cells and have been more recently recognized as targets of C. burnetii. Initial studies revealed that phase I C. burnetii infects and blocks the maturation of human dendritic cells, in contrast to phase II C. burnetii (258). Recently, we compared the responses of myeloid DCs (mDCs) to a panel of intracellular pathogens and demonstrated that the blockade of mDC maturation was partial, since they were still able to induce T-cell proliferation. The transcriptomic analysis of C. burnetii-stimulated mDCs revealed subtle alterations in type I IFN signaling (259). We also showed that C. burnetii is able to activate plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs), inducing their maturation and the release of type I IFN, a property of the host response to virus. The presence of C. burnetii within pDCs in Q fever lymphomas may be indicate an original role of pDCs during Q fever.
Besides αvβ3 integrin, the recognition of C. burnetii requires pattern recognition receptors, including Toll-like receptors (TLRs). Nevertheless, there are discordant data in the literature concerning their respective roles. We showed that TLR4 is involved in C. burnetii-stimulated cytoskeleton reorganization and the inflammatory response. However, it is not necessary for bacterial elimination in vivo (260). TLR2 plays a role in the type 1 immune response induced by phase II C. burnetii, and TL2-deficient macrophages are permissive to bacteria (242). We found that TLR2 is required for granuloma formation, as is TLR4 (261). The nature of the LPS from C. burnetii may explain the discrepancies about the role of TLR in bacterium-cell interactions. The lipid A of C. burnetii LPS is tetra-acylated, whereas LPS from Escherichia coli is hexa-acylated. Phase I LPS from C. burnetii would be a poor immunogenic stimulus and functions as an antagonist of TLR4-dependent signaling in macrophages, in contrast to LPS from E. coli (242). The use of a mouse model does not allow identification of this TLR4 antagonist property of C. burnetii LPS. Recently, it has been reported that humans with polymorphisms in TLR1 and NOD2 have reduced production of cytokines after infection with the C. burnetii Nine Mile and Dutch strains, and those with a polymorphism in TLR6 have an alteration of cytokine production only with the Dutch strain (262). Recently, it was reported that TLR10 exerts an inhibitory effect on cytokine production by C. burnetii-stimulated mononuclear cells; the polymorphisms of TLR10 described in Q fever patients were not associated with a specific clinical expression or prognosis (263).
The adaptive immune system is required to cure C. burnetii infection. The use of murine models such as SCID mice (264) and the follow-up of patients with immunosuppression (86) strengthen this statement. There is an unequal efficiency of the two arms of the adaptive immune response, T cells and antibodies.
T cells are necessary to control the infection, since nude and SCID mice are highly sensitive to C. burnetii infection (225, 264), and the reconstitution of SCID mice with CD4+ or CD8+ T cells is sufficient to restore protective immunity. It seems that CD8+ T cells are more efficient in controlling C. burnetii infection than CD4+ T cells (265). Recently, we found that central memory CD8+ T cells are increased, whereas naive CD8+ T cells are decreased, in patients with Q fever endocarditis (266). We also showed that the expression of PDL-1 is increased in patients with acute Q fever, and this would prevent the expansion of memory T cells (266). Such an imbalance of circulating lymphoid cells may play a major role in the chronic progression of Q fever.
It has been established for a long time that the polarization of the T-cell response toward the Th1 phenotype, i.e., the ability to produce IFN-γ, was the paradigm of the protective response against intracellular pathogens. Indeed, it has been shown that virulent C. burnetii induces a Th1 protective immune response, in contrast to avirulent variants (267). Some epitopes of C. burnetii, identified by bioinformatics, are able to stimulate Th1 T cells (268). There is converging evidence that IFN-γ makes macrophages resistant to C. burnetii. First, mice with knockouts (KO) in the IFN-γ gene are highly susceptible to C. burnetii infection (269). Second, we showed that IFN-γ induces a microbicidal response against C. burnetii in macrophages (270). The mechanisms used by IFN-γ to control C. burnetii infection are diverse and vary with the type of host. The microbicidal effect of IFN-γ does not depend on reactive oxygen intermediates, and Q fever is no more frequent in patients with chronic granulomatous disease (270, 271). The role of reactive nitrogen intermediates is debated, and if they contribute to the IFN-γ effect, this is restricted to murine models (242, 270, 272, 273). IFN-γ induces a microbicidal program directed at C. burnetii via oxygen-independent mechanisms, including phagosome maturation (274), apoptosis (270), production of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF) (275), and regulation of nutrients such as iron (251). Taking the data together, a reductionist point of view about the role of Th1 cells and IFN-γ had prevailed in earlier years. The primary infection, with C. burnetii progressing to cure or the immune response to vaccination, was considered to correspond to a Th1 immune response with IFN-γ production, while both were considered defective in patients with persistent C. burnetii infection (276, 277). However, Dutch teams have demonstrated that, in contrast to what had been generally assumed, the production of IFN-γ is not defective in persistent C. burnetii infection (278, 279). The production of IFN-γ is used as a specific biomarker of chronic Q fever and, like IL-2, it is a good marker of antibiotic treatment efficacy (233, 280). In addition, these patients respond to IFN-γ by upregulating genes downstream of the IFN-γ-receptor and producing neopterin (T. Schoffelen, J. Textoris, C. P. Bleeker-Rovers, A. Ben Amara, J. W. M. van der Meer, M. G. Netea, J.-L. Mege, M. van Deuren, and E. van de Vosse, submitted for publication). The fact that genetic polymorphisms in IL12B are associated with the development of Q fever (Schoffelen et al., submitted) emphasizes the fact that persistent C. burnetii infection does not result from a deficiency in Th1 polarization.
If the persistence of C. burnetii is not the consequence of a defective type 1 immune response, several hypotheses can be considered. There is an immunosuppressive context in the persistent progression of Q fever. There are changes in circulating immune cells, including depressed CD4+ T cells (281), naive CD8+ T cells (266), nonclassical monocyte subsets (282), CD56dim NK cells, and increased naive CD8+ T cells (266) and regulatory T cells (283). There is also an exacerbated inflammatory response consisting of high levels of TNF, IL-1, IL-6, CD23, neopterin, and chemokines (251, 275, 284, 285). It is likely that this uncontrolled inflammatory reaction may contribute to the pathogenesis of Q fever. Also, the persistence of C. burnetii is associated with the upregulation of immunoregulatory mediators such as prostaglandin E2 (276) and IL-10 (286, 287).
The second arm of the adaptive immune response, antibodies, has been considered dispensable for host protection against C. burnetii infection. Animal models and human infection are characterized by the production of specific antibodies. Initial studies showed that passive transfer of antibodies protected guinea pigs from a subsequent challenge with C. burnetii (288). Passive immunization of naive mice with antibodies isolated from vaccinated mice provided full protection (267). However, immune sera or B cells from C. burnetii-challenged mice do not confer protection against C. burnetii when transferred to SCID mice (267). High antibody titers directed to phase I and phase II antigens are found in persistent C. burnetii infection and are not effective for C. burnetii clearance. Moreover, it is likely that these specific antibodies have deleterious effects in Q fever patients. They can contribute to tissue lesions via the formation of immune complexes (289). They can also regulate the activity of cells expressing receptors for immunoglobulins, but that point remains debated. We showed that C. burnetii opsonized with specific immunoglobulins from Q fever patients is more readily internalized, reaches multibacillary vacuoles, and stimulates the production of IL-10 (290). Other groups did not find an immunosuppressive effect of opsonization but found rather that it could favor DC maturation and cytokine production (291). Finally, antibody formation during C. burnetii infection can target host components, and autoimmunity has been associated with acute Q fever (292–294). During primary C. burnetii infection, anticardiolipin antibodies are usually detected, and high levels of IgG anti-cardiolipin antibodies have been associated with rapid progression to C. burnetii endocarditis (295).
In conclusion, the control of C. burnetii primary infection is obtained via the induction of a full cell-mediated immune response, in which the Th1 response and IFN-γ production are the most important, while antibodies are dispensable. This strong Th1 response may cause autoimmune disorders. The progression to C. burnetii persistent infection reflects failure of the Th1 response and results from a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic parameters, in which IL-10 plays a significant role.
Determinants of the intracellular persistence of C. burnetii.
In contrast to the case for human mononuclear phagocytes, cumulative evidence suggests that C. burnetii vacuoles mature through the endolysosomal cascade to a phagolysosome in nonprofessional phagocytes. However, this is overly simplified, because C. burnetii modifies the phagosome to create a vacuole with fusion with other endolysosomal and autophagic compartments and cargo from secretory pathways (296).
In human mononuclear phagocytes, the intracellular trafficking of C. burnetii has been well described (274). After phagocytosis, virulent and avirulent C. burnetii organisms are localized within early phagosomes harboring early endosome antigen 1 (EEA-1) and the small GTPase rab5. The early phagosome is then converted into a late phagosome, characterized by lysosome-associated membrane protein 1 (LAMP-1), LAMP-2, and LAMP-3, the mannose-6-phosphate receptor (M6PR), and vacuolar proton ATPases responsible for the acidic pH (pH 4.5) of the compartment containing virulent or avirulent C. burnetii. The phagosome hiding avirulent C. burnetii acquires the small rab7, which is required for phagolysosome transition (297–299), and the lysosomal enzyme cathepsin D (274). In this compartment, avirulent bacteria are destroyed. Interestingly, virulent C. burnetii blocks the conversion of the late phagosome into a phagolysome by inhibiting the recruitment of rab7 and cathepsin D (274, 300), avoiding its degradation in the phagolysosome. Part of the mechanisms used by virulent C. burnetii to hijack the phagosome maturation has been elucidated (301, 302). Indeed, it has been demonstrated that variations in LPS determine the intracellular localization of C. burnetii. Avirulent C. burnetii LPS stimulates host p38α–mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling, which is required for the trafficking of bacterium-containing vacuoles to phagolysosomes for their destruction. In contrast, C. burnetii LPS does not. The defect in C. burnetii targeting to degradative phagolysosomes involves an antagonistic engagement of Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) by C. burnetii LPS, lack of p38α-MAPK-driven phosphorylation, and blockade of recruitment of the homotypic fusion and protein-sorting (HOPS) complex component vacuolar protein sorting 41 (Vps41) to C. burnetii LPS-containing vesicles. Thus, p38α-MAPK and its cross talk with Vps41 play a central role in trafficking C. burnetii to phagolysosomes (301). In addition, it has been recently demonstrated that C. burnetii avoids p38α-MAPK activation by the disruption of the association of TLR2 and TLR4 via an actin cytoskeleton reorganization induced by LPS (302). Several other factors, such as opsonization (290) and cytokine production (303), may greatly contribute to the establishment of the C. burnetii replicative vacuole, but the mechanisms involved remain unclear. Opsonization of C. burnetii with specific antibodies produced during persistent Q fever seems to prevent phagosome conversion, because large parasitophorous vacuoles containing C. burnetii but not expressing cathepsin D are formed (290). Cytokines have been shown to modulate phagosome maturation (303). In case of C. burnetii infection, several data suggest that IL-10 could contribute to the establishment of C. burnetii replicative phagosomes. The neutralization of IL-10 from monocytes of patients with persistent C. burnetii infection increases the killing of C. burnetii and rescues phagolysosome fusion similarly to what is observed in cured patients. In contrast, adding IL-10 to monocytes from patients with cured C. burnetii endocarditis avoids the killing of C. burnetii and inhibits phagolysosome biogenesis (300).
Host susceptibility factors.
Epidemiological studies have shown that Q fever symptoms are more frequent in men than in women (male/female ratio, 2.5), while both are similarly exposed to this pathogen, as evidenced by similar seroprevalence rates (304, 305). Recently, the follow-up of patients vaccinated during the Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands revealed higher rates of adverse effects in women than in men (306). The use of murine models of infection revealed the role of sex hormones in the predisposition for infection in men. Hence, female C57/BL6 mice are more resistant than males to C. burnetii infection; this property is lost after ovariectomy and is restored by the administration of 17β-estradiol (307). The study of gene expression signatures in mice infected with C. burnetii with and without castration shows the importance of sex-related genes (86% of genes differentially modulated in males and females) and the role of sex hormones, which account for 60% of modulated genes (308). The functional annotation of modulated genes enabled the identification of different clusters in males and females. The enrichment in clusters containing genes associated with the inflammatory response may account for the inflammatory profile of men with Q fever. Among the clusters enriched in infected females, the circadian rhythm pathway (consisting of positive molecules such as Clock and Arntl and negative molecules such as Per) is still not understood and may reveal some features of a microbicidal response to C. burnetii. Data for humans are rare. It has been shown that the expression of Per2 is increased in men with acute Q fever (309).
(i) Age.
Age is a risk factor for C. burnetii infection. Symptomatic Q fever is more frequent in individuals older than 15 years (310). The immunity of adults to C. burnetii accounts for the adult response to vaccine. During the vaccination campaign with Q-vax vaccine in the Netherlands, the best cellular and humoral responses to the antigen as well as protection against the infection were reported in young adults, who also suffered most frequently from local adverse effects (306).
In 14-month-old mice (corresponding to adult humans), the bacterial burden and the number of granulomas in tissues were higher than those in 1-month-old mice (307). Elderly patients develop an immune response to C. burnetii that reflects the level of immunosenescence. Patients at risk of persistent Q fever who are older than 75 years are lower producers of IFN-γ and specific antibodies than younger patients (311). The use of immunosuppressive drugs is likely a confounding factor.
(ii) Pregnancy.
The pathophysiology of Q fever during pregnancy is poorly understood, especially in humans. The infection of goats with C. burnetii provided some mechanistic hypotheses. After inoculation of pregnant goats, the primary targets are the trophoblasts of the allantochorion, while trophoblasts covering cotyledonary villi are not infected. The infection leads to the production of specific antibodies that persist for several months after delivery. There is an inflammatory reaction varying from mild infiltration of mononuclear cells to necrotic lesions (90). There is also a cellular response during and after parturition. IL-10 is upregulated during pregnancy, whereas TNF and IL-1 are increased after parturition (312). In women, there is some evidence that the immune response is silenced and antibodies are produced in response to infection (313). This might be related to IL-10 production, which may account for the increased risk of endocarditis after delivery. In human trophoblasts infected in vitro with C. burnetii, the bacteria replicate within vacuoles that express lysosomal markers, in contrast to myeloid cells. In addition, the interaction of C. burnetii with trophoblasts does not induce an inflammatory program, accounting for the relative immune silence observed during Q fever infection in pregnant women (314). This is strengthened by a recent study in which we showed that C. burnetii is unable to activate decidual DCs (315). It is likely that alterations of the immune response during pregnancy correspond mainly to the production of IL-10 and the silencing of DCs, which favors bacterial growth (312, 314).
(iii) Genetic factors.
Preexisting valvulopathy enhances the risk of endocarditis in patients with C. burnetii infection. The lack of vegetation and inflammation suggests a mechanism distinct from the colonization of cardiac valves found in usual infectious endocarditis. This suggests that factors related to the cardiac valve context, including the immune context, are involved. The study of cardiac valves and circulating mononuclear cells from patients with degenerative valvulopathy using microarray technology revealed the enrichment of the inflammatory program (316, 317); this creates the condition for the binding of inflammatory leukocytes, infected or not with C. burnetii. These findings are supported by the detection of activated lymphocytes and macrophages infiltrating bicuspid and tricuspid calcified stenosis (318). The study of lymphocytic populations revealed the important role of CD8+ T cells with a memory-effector phenotype and oligoclonal repertoire, while the role of memory-effector CD4+ T cells was less significant (319). C. burnetii endocarditis is more frequently observed in patients with bicuspid aortic valves (BAV) (320). BAV is the most frequent congenital heart disorder and has a sizeable heritable component, with some genes specifically associated with this entity (321). The analysis of genes expressed in BAV compared with tricuspid aortic valve controls showed the enrichment of the latter, with genes associated with inflammation and the immune response, compared with the former, in which genes involved in the development are overexpressed. This poor inflammatory context of BAV may favor the colonization of valves with infected cells. The mechanism of Q fever endocarditis in patients with BAV remains hypothetical. Although mechanical conditions such as increased flow turbulence due to inappropriate opening are likely, we hypothesize that apoptosis may be involved. Indeed, BAV is associated with increased apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells (322).
Role of IL-10
IL-10 properties.
Interleukin 10 (IL-10) is a class 2 cytokine produced by macrophages, monocytes, dendritic cells (DCs), lymphocytes, B cells, mast cells, eosinophils, and CD4+ T cells. The main functions of IL-10 are immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory, influencing both innate and adaptive responses. Hence, IL-10 contributes to maintaining appropriate conditions for microbe survival and persistent infection. During the innate immunity response to microbes, IL-10 downmodulates the production of inflammatory mediators and promotes the expression of anti-inflammatory mediators, including regulatory receptors such as the IL-10 receptor by myeloid cells. IL-10 has a strong potential for inhibiting the microbicidal activity of macrophages and the antigen-presenting activity of dendritic cells. On the other hand, IL-10 enhances its own production by CD4+ regulatory T cells. The anti-inflammatory properties of IL-10 were first demonstrated in IL-10-deficient mice, which developed chronic bowel disease, probably secondary to an inappropriate and aberrant immune response to bacterial antigens. During the adaptive response, IL-10 downregulates the production of Th1 cytokines, such as IL-2, IL-3, IFN-γ, and major histocompatibility complex class II (MHC II), and costimulatory molecule expression and interferes with T-cell polarization. Thus, IL-10 promotes the proliferation and differentiation of B cells (323, 324). Animal models have been used to exhaustively describe the influence of IL-10 on host susceptibility during primary infection (323). The reduction of IL-10 increases the resistance to infection, whereas IL-10 overproduction increases host susceptibility to bacteria and parasites (323). Interleukin-10 levels are determinant in the clearance or the persistence of pathogens infecting humans (324, 325). Hence, IL-10 is associated with tuberculosis (TB) reactivation, Bartonella henselae persistent infection, and Bartonella quintana chronic asymptomatic bacteremia (326, 327). In Q fever patients, C. burnetii is able to persist in macrophages, to escape the immune system, and to induce persistent infection; this persistence has been associated with sustained production of IL-10 (284, 300) (see below).
Role of IL-10 in endocarditis.
C. burnetii endocarditis lesions exhibit fibrosis, calcification, slight inflammation and vascularization, and small or absent cardiac vegetation, probably due to the intracellular nature of the bacterium (328). The persistence of C. burnetii in the infected host is characteristic of the progression to endocarditis. This statement is the consequence of several observations during the past years. First, IL-10 is secreted by mononuclear cells in patients with C. burnetii primary infection and valvulopathy at risk of developing endocarditis (286, 287). Second, IL-10 is important for the persistence of C. burnetii, since it interferes with the microbicidal program of host cells via the downmodulation of TNF production (300). The effect of IL-10 is not a result of nonspecific immunosuppression of macrophages, since other immunoregulatory cytokines failed to induce C. burnetii replication (227). Third, the impairment of macrophage microbicidal activity in patients with Q fever endocarditis is under the control of IL-10 (300). Fourth, the use of mice overexpressing IL-10 in the myeloid compartment reproduces most of the features of Q fever endocarditis, including bacterial persistence, lack of granuloma formation, and overproduction of specific antibodies (226). However, IL-10 by itself is not sufficient to cause endocarditis. Fifth, IL-10 is produced during Q fever by monocytes, by dendritic cells, and in response to anti-C. burnetii antibodies. When the latter are used as opsonizing antibodies, they favor the formation of multibacillary vacuoles within the macrophages and the secretion of IL-10 (290). This amplification loop may be critical in the pathophysiology of C. burnetii endocarditis, since IL-10 favors the production of antibodies, and specific antibodies via the recognition of phospholipid determinants are likely involved in the progression to endocarditis. The presence of IL-10 may also explain the poor inflammatory phenotype of C. burnetii endocarditis. We hypothesized that the phagocytosis of apoptotic leukocytes known to lead to IL-10 release is involved in the formation of endocarditis. Valvulopathy is associated with altered fluid shear stress and increased circulation of cells, including leukocytes (257). The uptake of leukocytes by monocytes and macrophages stimulates the replication of C. burnetii and the production of IL-10. It is likely that the immune context will determine the development of endocarditis: if patients with valvulopathy are able to exhibit a Th1-like immune response, the effects of apoptosis and Il-10 are prevented; in contrast, patients unable to develop a Th1-like response would have an increased risk of C. burnetii endocarditis (251). This hypothesis will require confirmation in an animal model.
Role of IL-10 in lymphoma.
IL-10 is known to play a role in B-cell lymphoma genesis by promoting B-cell proliferation and by compromising the function of immune cells, which then become unable to kill tumor cells (329, 330). High levels of IL-10 are observed in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma and are associated with a poor prognosis (331, 332). IL-10 was also used as a prognostic and therapeutic marker in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) (330, 331, 333). It was also proposed as a new therapeutic target in DLBCL (333). C. burnetii has recently been reported as being linked to B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (334). Patients with Q fever presented an excess risk of DLBCL and follicular lymphoma (FL) compared to the general population. The direct evidence for the role of C. burnetii in lymphomas was provided by the study of tumoral biopsy specimens using fluorescence in situ hybridization; viable C. burnetii cells were present within macrophages and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) but not in B cells. Furthermore, patients with Q fever and lymphoma presented an overproduction of IL-10 compared to that in patients with Q fever lymphadenitis or with acute Q fever but no valvulopathy. High levels of IL-10 were also observed in patients with C. burnetii lymphadenitis, in which C. burnetii was identified in lymph node macrophages but not in pDCs (334). By infecting macrophages and pDCs and by inducing overexpression of IL-10, C. burnetii might be responsible for an immune impairment that promotes both C. burnetii replication within the tumoral microenvironment and tumoral growth (334, 335).
CURRENT TOOLS FOR LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS
Because C. burnetii does not grow with the use of standard routine laboratory culture techniques, specific indirect diagnostic tools have been mainly used for diagnosis. Consequently, serology is still the most common method for testing for C. burnetii infection. Currently, detection of C. burnetii DNA by qPCR in various clinical samples (including blood, cardiac valves, or other surgical tissue biopsy specimens) is also available. It has the advantage of detecting C. burnetii before seroconversion in patients with primary infection. Culture can be performed by reference laboratories on the same clinical samples, but this requires a biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory. Finally, pathological analysis of infected tissue samples, after immunohistochemistry staining, is an interesting tool for diagnosis when these samples are available. Improvement of the sensitivity of the main diagnostic techniques has been the principal objective in recent years.
Serology
General principles.
In the presence of symptoms suggestive of C. burnetii infection, serology is the first-line diagnostic technique. The immune response induces the production of anti-phase II and anti-phase I antibodies (42). C. burnetii phase II antigen is obtained after several passages in cell cultures or eggs, and anti-phase II antibodies are predominant during primary infection (336). C. burnetii phase I antigen is obtained from the spleens of infected mice, and anti-phase I antibodies are associated with persistent infection (336). The phase II antibodies are detectable 7 to 15 days after the onset of clinical symptoms and decrease thereafter within 3 to 6 months (42). The diagnosis of primary infection can be made by detection of a 4-fold increase in phase II IgG or IgM antibodies between two serum samples taken 3 to 6 weeks apart (42). Antibodies are detectable by the third week after infection in 90% of patients (336). For that reason, two serum samples (one from the acute phase and one from the convalescent phase) should be analyzed. Cutoffs for a positive serological titer can vary between countries. Generally, titers of phase II IgG of ≥200 and/or IgM of ≥50 are considered significant for the diagnosis of primary Q fever infection (336, 337), and phase II IgG titers tend to be higher than phase I IgG titers during primary infection (42, 86). Independently of the symptomatology, residual IgG antibody titers may be detectable for years and even for life (338). Wielders et al. have shown that early treatment of primary infection (before an antibody response) did not influence the subsequent IgG II response (339).
Elevated phase I IgG titers (IgG I titer of ≥1:800) are associated with persistent Q fever. Higher phase I IgG titers correlate with a higher positive predictive value (PPV) for the diagnosis of C. burnetii endocarditis: a PPV of 37% was found for IgG I titers of ≥1:800, and this reached 75% for IgG I titers of ≥1:6,400 in a study from our reference center (340). For that reason, investigation for persistent infection should be performed in the case of persistent high levels of phase I antibodies 6 months after completion of treatment (see Management Strategy for Patients with C. burnetii Infection section and Clinical Aspects section below). However, cases of Q fever endocarditis with low antibody titers have been reported. In a series of 125 patients with cardiovascular infection who underwent surgery, we found 4 patients with a definite cardiovascular infection with positive culture and/or PCR on valvular biopsy, three of whom had a phase I IgG titer at 1:400 and one of whom had a phase I IgG titer at 1:200 (341).
Serology methods.
Indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) is the reference method, but the complement fixation test (CFT) and ELISA are also used. Others techniques exist, such as Western blotting, dot immunoblotting, radioimmunoassay, microagglutination, and the indirect hemolysis test, but they remain anecdotal. To date, only IFA, CFT, and ELISA are commercially available. The advantage of ELISA is that it is easy to perform, interpretation is less subjective than for IFA and CFT, and automation is possible. This method is mentioned in the CDC case definition of acute and chronic Q fever (42). The specificity, sensitivity, and positive predictive value vary according to the technique and the antigen used. Wegdam-Blans et al. recently compared the performance of commercially available ELISA, CFT, and IFA. For the diagnosis of primary infection, the authors used serum samples from patients with a positive qPCR on blood (342). The most sensitive technique was IFA for detecting IgM antibodies at an early phase of infection and after 12 months of follow-up. Regarding IgG, IFA was more frequently positive than ELISA and CFT (100%, 95.2%, and 96.8%, respectively), but the difference was not statistically significant (342). Regarding phase I antibodies in patients with persistent C. burnetii infection at the time of diagnosis, the sensitivities of CFT and ELISA were 83% and 93.9%, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant (343). Overall, using CFT, 16.3% of patients with phase I IgG were undetected. Also, a poor correlation was observed between antibody kinetics in ELISA, CFT, and IFA. Therefore, the sensitivity of CFT appears to be too low to be recommended for diagnosis and follow-up of C. burnetii persistent infection.
Most reference laboratories have developed their own in-house immunofluorescence assay. In our center, screening is performed with phase II antigen on serum diluted at 1:50 and 1:100 to detect total immunoglobulins (IgT) directed against C. burnetii antigens (344). For all positive screenings with IgT titers of ≥1:100, quantification detection of antibodies for the subclasses IgG, IgM, and IgA for both phase I and phase II is performed. The titration of IgM and IgA is performed after removal of IgG using a rheumatoid factor absorbent to eliminate false-positive results due to interference with this protein. Moreover, the sera are diluted in phosphate-buffered saline with 3% nonfat powdered milk to saturate the antigenic site and avoid a nonspecific fixation of antibodies. Sensitivity was assessed at 58.4% and specificity at 100% (344). For sera with titers inferior to these cutoffs, the serology should be repeated within 10 to 15 days to confirm or rule out the diagnosis.
One study compared Q fever serological results from different reference centers from three countries (United Kingdom, France, and Australia) (345). The concordance between the three centers in microimmunofluorescence interpretation was only 35%. France and the UK had the lowest concordance, and the UK and Australia had the highest. This reflects the fact that serology is not the most perfect tool, because of high subjective variability of interpretation. Cross-reactions with Legionella micdadei and Bartonella have been described with IFA (346, 347). Musso and Raoult found that 34.5% of patients with primary Q fever presented significant antibody titers for L. micdadei (346). La Scola and Raoult observed that sera from 50% of patients with Q fever displayed cross-reactivity with Bartonella (347). However, in most cases, a low level of cross-reactions was observed, and antibody titers were higher for C. burnetii, so that generally there was no problem in the interpretation of results.
Recently, a new automated epifluorescence assay was developed by InoDiag (Signes, France) for Q fever serological diagnosis. Except for the deposition of the serum, all subsequent steps have been automated. The performance of this technique was recently compared with that of a gold standard microimmunofluorescence technique. It showed heterogenous performances, with a low sensitivity for primary infection due to low reactivity of phase II antigens but an excellent performance for persistent infection, with 100% sensitivity in the detection of phase I antigens (348).
Molecular Detection
Several PCR-based assays have been developed for the detection of C. burnetii in clinical samples. The first standard PCR systems targeted sequences of different types of plasmids (349), the 16S-23S RNA, the superoxide dismutase gene, the com1 gene or the IS1111 repetitive elements in human or animal samples (56, 350–352). The detection limits of these different methods ranged from 10 to 102 bacteria. Also, nested PCR systems have been proposed, but these methods lack specificity (353, 354). Real-time PCR or quantitative PCR (qPCR) is a less time-consuming technique than PCR and has the advantage of quantifying the amount of bacteria in clinical samples. Thus, this method has become the most frequently used PCR system for diagnosis. The qPCR system targeting IS1111 (a repetitive element which is present in about 20 copies in the C. burnetii Nine Mile genome) is the most sensitive (124, 355, 356). This qPCR can detect the bacterium in the sera of patients within the first 2 weeks of infection, when serology is not yet positive. It also allows detection of C. burnetii DNA in the blood of patients with persistent C. burnetii infection (357). In the Netherlands, Schneeberger et al. found C. burnetii DNA in 10% of seronegative samples from patients with signs of primary infection, confirming the usefulness of this method in the first 2 weeks of infection (358). In another study from the Netherlands, this assay displayed sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and negative predictive value (NPV) of 92.2%, 98.9%, 99.2%, and 89.8%, respectively, during the outbreak (359). In that study, a high DNA load during primary infection was associated with progression to persistent infection. Tilburg et al. assessed the interlaboratory concordance of IS1111 qPCR according to the assay and a DNA extraction method used in seven laboratories across the Netherlands (360). They found that multiple combinations of DNA extraction kits and qPCR assays gave equivalent results for Q fever diagnosis. In Switzerland, a qPCR system targeting the ompA gene has been used for 7 years for detection of C. burnetii in clinical samples (361). The sensitivity was 88% for valvular samples, 69% for blood samples, and 50% for urine samples. In our laboratory, another qPCR system targeting IS30A repetitive elements displayed a lower sensitivity than IS1111 qPCR (124).
Recently, we improved the sensitivity of the qPCR test targeting the IS1111 gene by concentrating DNA extracted from clinical samples by lyophilization (362). The detection limit of C. burnetii DNA was 100-fold lower in lyophilized sera (1 bacterium/ml) than in nonlyophilized sera (102 bacteria/ml). This strategy was tested in 73 sera from patients with primary C. burnetii infection and 10 sera from endocarditis patients, in whom the IS1111 qPCR performed under the usual conditions remained negative. In patients presenting with primary Q fever, we observed qPCR sensitivity gains of 44% for the seronegative sera and 30% for early seropositive sera after lyophilization. The sensitivity of qPCR was also higher in sera from patients with endocarditis, of whom 8/10 (80%) were positive after lyophilization.
Culture
The isolation of C. burnetii can be achieved from a wide range of clinical samples, including old samples if they have been stored at −80°C before cultivation. The shell vial technique is still the most frequently used method (363). A sample of 1 ml of the clinical specimen is inoculated on HEL cell monolayers in shell vials. The shell vials are then centrifuged (700 × g at 20°C) for 1 h. Centrifugation allows better attachment and penetration of C. burnetii inside cells. Infected cells are then incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2-enriched atmosphere for 5 to 7 days. Gimenez or immunofluorescence staining is used for detection of the bacterium inside cells. Lockhart et al. have compared four different cell lines for the isolation of C. burnetii using two different isolates, the Henzerling and Arandale strains (364). For the Henzerling strain, DH82 cells were the most sensitive, while for the Arandale isolate, Vero cells showed the highest sensitivity. The L929 and XTC cell lines were less suitable for culture of C. burnetii.
Recently, the first isolation of C. burnetii in axenic medium from clinical samples was reported using ACCM2 (170). A sample of the heart valve from a patient with C. burnetii endocarditis was incubated in 20 ml of ACCM2, and growth was observed after 6 to 8 days of incubation. Inoculation of an ACCM2 agar plate with a sample of the culture-positive liquid ACCM2 yielded several colonies at day 5 (170). This new possibility could significantly facilitate the routine cultivation of C. burnetii from clinical samples.
Pathology and Immunohistochemistry
The immune reaction provoked in various organs by C. burnetii can be unraveled by pathological analysis of tissue samples after fixation and paraffin embedding. During primary infection, a typical fibrin-ring granuloma with a “doughnut” aspect can be observed on hepatic biopsy specimens (365). These granulomas have also been observed in the bone marrow (366–369). During persistent infection, pathological analysis of cardiac valves and vascular tissue can also be informative. In patients with C. burnetii endocarditis, histological analysis can reveal significant fibrosis, calcifications, slight inflammation and vascularization, and little or no vegetation (328). These features illustrate a slow “degenerative-like” infectious process. Immunohistochemical (IHC) detection is a more specific tool that can aid detection of C. burnetii in tissues. It uses a monoclonal antibody with an immunoperoxidase-based method (328). Lepidi et al. also developed a method called “autoimmunochemistry,” using antibodies produced from the patient's own serum (370). IHC was used for detection of C. burnetii in aortic graft samples and hepatic and valvular biopsy specimens (328, 371, 372).
New Tools
Immuno-PCR.
Immuno-PCR is an interesting method, combining the amplification power of PCR with the specificity and versatility of ELISA, allowing an improvement in sensitivity. We tested this method on a collection of serum samples from Q fever patients (373). Immuno-PCR had significantly better sensitivity than ELISA and IFA (90% versus 35% and 25%, respectively) in sera collected during the first 2 weeks after the onset of symptoms (373). Its specificity was evaluated at 92%.
IFN-γ and IL-2 detection.
The detection of C. burnetii-specific gamma interferon (IFN-γ) production has been proposed as a new diagnostic tool. Schoffelen et al. have compared the performance of this method with those of classic IFA and skin tests for Q fever (278). The IFN-γ production assay is performed after in vitro stimulation of whole blood with antigens from the Q-vax vaccine or the inactivated Nine Mile strain. The measurement of IFN-γ production is then performed using ELISA. IFN-γ production was higher in seropositive and skin test-positive patients than in negative ones. The sensitivity and specificity (87% and 90.2%, respectively) were similar to those for the association of serology and skin test. In another study, the same authors evaluated the usefulness of this method in differentiating between past and persistent C. burnetii infection. IFN-γ production was significantly higher in patients with persistent infection than in controls, but overlapping values existed. Assay of a second cytokine, IL-2, revealed significantly higher values in controls than in patients with persistent infection. As a consequence, an IFN-γ/IL-2 ratio of >11 had a sensitivity and specificity of 79% and 97%, respectively, for the diagnosis of persistent infection (233). In a recent study, this ratio was proposed for monitoring treatment of persistent C. burnetii infection (233). It decreased significantly when patients had a successful treatment outcome (233). Thus, an IFN-γ/IL-2 ratio of >11 may be an interesting additional marker to monitor the progress of patients with persistent infection.
CLINICAL ASPECTS
Chronic Q Fever: from Historical Background to Recent Controversy
Historical background.
In 1937, Edward Holbrook Derrick reported the first clinical description of a C. burnetii infection when investigating an outbreak of febrile illnesses among slaughterhouse workers in Brisbane, Queensland, Australia (374). He proposed the name of “Q fever” for “query fever,” until further knowledge could allow a better name. In the following years, the first U.S. case of human Q fever, in a member of the NIH staff who was cultivating an infectious agent isolated by Cox in Guinea pigs inoculated with a tick sample, was reported (375). Several outbreaks in different parts of the world were then reported, including in the Americas in the 1940s (at the NIH, in California, and in Panama) (376–378) and in Europe among allied troops during World War II (in northern Italy and the Balkans) (379). In these early reports, “Q fever” was considered to be an acute disease causing outbreaks of fever and pneumonia.
In 1949, Beck and Bell were the first to note that: “several persons have been found with a chronic febrile illness dating back to a proved attack of Q fever” (378). Some years later, Marmion et al. described what they called “a subacute Rickettsial endocarditis,” which was a negative blood culture endocarditis with high levels of Q fever phase I antibodies; isolation of the bacterium was obtained in guinea pigs from an aortic valve sample (380, 381). In these reports, the term “chronic Q fever” was coined for the first time. In 1962, Powell and Stallman found that detection of IgG I was associated with protracted convalescence from Q fever in the elderly. However, the authors stated that the presence of phase I antibodies was an indication of “past persistent infection” but that it was not necessarily proof of present persistent infection in the absence of clinical signs (382). One year later, the WHO study group on rickettsial diseases established a serological cutoff for phase I antibody titers at 1:200 for the diagnosis of “chronic Q fever” (383). Over the following years, both terms, “Q fever endocarditis” and “chronic Q fever,” were used synonymously to describe one and the same entity (383–385), as stressed by an editorial in the Lancet in 1976 entitled “Chronic Q fever or Q fever endocarditis?” (386). It was previously observed that these cases of endocarditis affected mainly the aortic valve (387) and had a very poor prognosis, with frequent relapses after surgical valve replacement and treatment with tetracyclines alone (388). In 1978, Turck discussed the accuracy of the serological criteria for Q fever endocarditis developed by the WHO study group (389). This author pointed out that some cases of proven Q fever endocarditis (i.e., with the organism being isolated from valves postmortem) were reported with only slightly elevated levels of phase I antibodies (389). Also in 1978, Spicer suggested that the significance of phase I antibodies should be interpreted carefully, in conjunction with the medical history (383). In 1983, Ellis et al. reported a series of 16 cases of “chronic” Q fever, among which eight were not endocarditis but one of the following conditions: aortic prosthetic graft infections, spondylodiscitis with psoas abscess, infection of a ventricular aneurysm, infection during pregnancy, and unexpected death of a 9-month-old infant (390). that paper suggested early that C. burnetii infectious foci could be very diverse and that a wide range of clinical settings were artificially grouped under the generic term “chronic Q fever.”
However, some years later, Peacock et al. reinforced the idea that IgG I serological cutoffs could differentiate between two restricted patterns of the disease: “primary Q fever” and “chronic Q fever,” which could manifest as granulomatous hepatitis or endocarditis (391). That study included 15 patients (5 with primary infection, 5 with endocarditis, and 5 with “granulomatous hepatitis”) and found that granulomatous hepatitis was associated with persistent elevated phase II IgG and that endocarditis was associated with both phase I and II elevated antibodies and high levels of IgA (391). A second work by the same group with a larger sample of patients confirmed the association of phase I IgG with endocarditis (392). However, in this seminal study, the entity of “chronic granulomatous hepatitis” was not clearly defined. Actually, granulomas were more frequently described in previous reports in acute Q fever hepatitis, while chronic liver abnormalities were described mainly in the context of endocarditis. Moreover, early serological studies in countries where the disease was endemic failed to demonstrate that Q fever was a cause of chronic liver disease (383, 390). Until now, this entity of isolated “chronic granulomatous Q fever hepatitis” has been extremely rarely reported, and most of the reports employing this term actually deal with either acute granulomatous hepatitis or chronic hepatitis associated with endocarditis (372, 393–400). This early example illustrates that cautious definitions are mandatory in order to avoid considering artificial clinical entities.
Nevertheless, the accumulation of restricted serological criteria coupled with the lack of other powerful microbiological diagnostic tools induced a dissociation between “serological chronic Q fever” and possible clinical manifestations of the infection. This is illustrated by a report in 1985 dealing with “subclinical chronic Q fever” by Fergusson et al. In that paper, the authors described seven patients with high IgG I levels but without a detectable localized infection. In fact, the serological definition of “chronic Q fever” prevented the authors from diagnosing what can easily be considered today, with current classifications, as four possible cases of endocarditis, two possible infections of cardiac ventricular aneurysms, and one possible abdominal aortic aneurysm infection (401). Unfortunately, the damage from this misleading term has continued until very recently, discouraging clinicians from investigating C. burnetii infectious foci. In a case report from 2006, de Silva et al. (688) described two patients with “atypical chronic Q fever” considered to be without a focus of infection, which using current diagnostic criteria could be considered possible endocarditis and/or osteoarticular infection and thus should have led to more thorough investigations.
Our team, like all specialists working on Q fever worldwide, also used the consensual “chronic Q fever” term in the past. In particular, we confirmed early on that endocarditis was associated with high levels of IgG1 antibodies (402), with titers of >800, and defined by a spontaneous progression longer than 6 months (337, 396). Also, we contributed to the modification of the Duke criteria, showing that the inclusion of this serological cutoff as a major criterion would improve the diagnosis of C. burnetii endocarditis (403, 404). Some years later we revaluated the PPV of this cutoff in the French situation of endemicity and proposed a new serological IgG1 cutoff at 1,600 to allow better detection of these cases of endocarditis (340). We also contributed to the early description of C. burnetii vascular graft, joint, and bone infections (394, 405), which were all grouped at that time under the generic “chronic Q fever” term. However, the reanalysis of the literature by a different team, leading to a corpus of controversial hypotheses, has helped us to clarify the existing nosology of C. burnetii infection and to abandon the inaccurate “chronic Q fever” term.
The controversy raised by Dutch Q fever consensus group guidelines.
The recent widespread outbreak of Q fever in the Netherlands allowed us to reexamine the existing nosology of the infection, leading to continuing controversy on this topic. The total number of reported human cases of primary Q fever during this epidemic reached 4,108 between 2007 and 2011 (406). Moreover, because C. burnetii primary infection is frequently asymptomatic, these notifications reflected only part of the real magnitude of the outbreak (407). A seroprevalence study in blood donors by Van der Hoek et al. in a high-prevalence area estimated that 3,522 reported infections between 2007 and 2009 corresponded to approximately 44,000 primary C. burnetii infections (408). Consequently, the early detection of long-term complications of the infection was soon considered a central public health issue. With this in mind, in 2012 the Dutch consensus Q fever group published new criteria for “chronic Q fever” (409). The new guidelines distinguished three categories of possible, probable and proven cases of chronic Q fever (Table 2). Possible chronic Q fever was defined by an isolated serological criterion (IgG I greater than 1:1,024), and proven chronic Q fever was defined by a positive PCR on blood or tissue or by serological criteria associated with evidence of endocarditis (according to the modified Duke criteria) or vascular infections. Probable chronic Q fever consisted of the association of serological criteria with a myriad of clinical situations from pregnancy to the immunocompromised state or evidence of granulomatous lesions (Table 2). Actually, several important issues were raised by these new criteria and were pointed out by our team (410).
TABLE 2.
Category and criterion (criteria)b |
---|
Proven chronic Q fever |
Positive C. burnetii PCR in blood or tissue or |
IFA titer of ≥1:1,024 for C. burnetii phase I IgG and |
Definite endocarditis according to the modified Duke criteria or |
Proven large-vessel or prosthetic infection by imaging studies (18 F-FDG PET, CT, MRI, or AUS) |
Probable chronic Q fever |
IFA titer of ≥1:1,024 for C. burnetii phase I IgG and one or more of the following criteria: |
Valvulopathy not meeting the major criteria of the modified Duke criteria |
Known aneurysm and/or vascular or cardiac valve prosthesis without signs of infection by means of TEE/TTE, 18 F-FDG PET, CT, MRI, or abdominal Doppler ultrasound |
Suspected osteomyelitis or hepatitis as manifestation of chronic Q fever |
Pregnancy |
Symptoms and signs of chronic infection such as fever, wt loss, and night sweats, hepatosplenomegaly, persistent elevated ESR and CRP |
Granulomatous tissue inflammation, proven by histological examination |
Immunocompromised state |
Possible chronic Q fever |
IFA titer of ≥1:1,024 for C. burnetii phase I IgG without manifestations meeting the criteria for proven or probable chronic Q fever |
Adapted from reference 409 with permission of Elsevier.
MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; AUS, abdominal ultrasonography; ESR, erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
(i) Isolated serological criteria for diagnosis are simplistic.
In the Dutch consensus guidelines, the “possible chronic Q fever” category is based solely on a serological criterion without clinical manifestation or notion of follow-up duration. The problem with such a definition is that IgG I titers can vary widely, depending on the clinical situation and C. burnetii strain involved (238). For example, the MST 17 C. burnetii strain from Cayenne, French Guiana, is responsible for high levels of phase I IgG in acute Q fever pneumonia patients. We showed in a previous work that 36% of patients from Cayenne, French Guiana, with acute Q fever had phase I IgG titers of >1:1,600 (238), so these patients could have been falsely classified as having “possible chronic Q fever” with the Dutch definition. The other risk of serological cutoffs when they are considered alone is that cases of “possible chronic Q fever” are not thoroughly investigated to find a focus of infection, because the recommended management in this situation is only “follow-up.” On the contrary, investigations are necessary to identify a nosologic entity that allows determination of the most appropriate treatment (including the need for dual antibiotherapy or surgery) and its duration. Moreover, today new diagnostic tools such as 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18 F-FDG PET/CT) are available and frequently allow localization of the infection (411, 412). Thus, we consider that this “possible chronic Q fever” category is not only useless but deleterious, because classifying a patient under this imprecise term can lead to neglecting a real persistent focus of infection.
(ii) Mixing different clinical entities under a generic term neglects the natural history and determinants of the disease.
The term “chronic Q fever” is misleading, because it mixes very different clinical entities that warrant different strategies for prophylaxis, diagnosis, and treatment. this gave us the opportunity to reanalyze how we consider the natural history of C. burnetii infection (Fig. 4). We think that this natural history is quite similar to what happens in tuberculosis (TB). In TB, the primary infection can be symptomatic or not. In the absence of treatment and depending on host susceptibilities, persistent infection can develop, with various possible localizations (lymphadenitis, miliary, meningitis, or Pott's disease) that have to be detected in order to determine a specific treatment strategy. Regarding C. burnetii infection, the primary infection can also be symptomatic (acute Q fever) or not, depending on the strain involved (144, 165) and on the patient's susceptibilities (due to age, sex, immunosuppression, or pregnancy) (413). If left untreated, diverse persistent focalized infections can develop, depending mainly on host susceptibilities.
C. burnetii endocarditis occurs in patients with preexisting valvulopathy (mainly bicuspid aortic valve) (414) and is initially associated with high levels of anticardiolipin antibody (320). Its prognosis has significantly improved, due to a strategy of systematic screening for valvulopathy in cases of primary C. burnetii infection and initiation of prophylaxis (415). Another argument against the acute/chronic dichotomy is the recent description of “acute” endocarditis caused by C. burnetii (416). This is a new clinical entity, due to a probable autoimmune mechanism during C. burnetii primary infection.
Vascular infections occur in patients with preexisting aneurysms of a vascular graft and remain very severe diseases (with mortality rates up to 25%), for which surgery appears to be mandatory (417, 418). In this group, C. burnetii infections of preexisting aneurysms or vascular grafts have to be distinguished from mycotic aneurysms resulting from septic emboli in C. burnetii endocarditis. Osteoarticular infections are an emerging clinical entity for which no deaths have been reported to date (419). Joint prosthesis may be a predisposing factor, but further studies are needed to confirm this (420). Persistent lymphadenitis is another recognized focus of infection (412).
Also, we recently showed that C. burnetii persistent infections could lead to lymphomagenesis (334). C. burnetii infection in pregnant women is a particular entity, most often with an asymptomatic primary infection that can lead to severe obstetrical complications and fetal malformations (148) (Fig. 4). Its outcome may also depend on the involved strain (164).
Given the polymorphic manifestations of C. burnetii infection, we proposed alternative definitions for all C. burnetii persistent infectious foci (Table 3) (410, 412, 420).
TABLE 3.
Criterion or diagnosis type | Definition for C. burnetii: |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Endocarditis | Vascular infection | Prosthetic joint arthritis | Osteoarticular infection (without prosthesis) | Lymphadenitis | |
Criteria | |||||
Definite | Positive culture, PCR, or immunochemistry of a cardiac valve | Positive culture, PCR, or immunochemistry of an arterial sample (prosthesis or aneurysm) or a periarterial abscess or a spondylodiscitis linked to aorta | Positive culture, PCR, or immunochemistry of a periprosthetic biopsy specimen or joint aspirate | Positive culture, PCR, or immunochemistry of bone or synovial biopsy specimen or joint aspirate | Positive culture, PCR, immunohistochemistry, or fluorescence in situ hybridization of lymphadenitis |
Major | Microbiology—positive culture or PCR of the blood, an embolus or serology with IgG1 antibody titer of ≥6,400 mg/dl. Evidence of endocardial involvement—(i) Echocardiogram positive for infective endocarditis: oscillating intracardiac mass on valve or supporting structures, in the path of regurgitant jets, or on implanted material in the absence of an alternative anatomic explanation; abscess; new partial dehiscence of a prosthetic valve; or new valvular regurgitation (worsening or changing of preexisting murmur is not sufficient). (ii) PET scan displaying a specific valve fixation and mycotic aneurism. | Microbiology—positive culture, PCR of the blood or emboli, or serology with IgG1 antibody titer of ≥6,400 mg/dl. Evidence of vascular involvement—(i) CT scan: aneurysm or vascular prosthesis + periarterial abscess, fistula, or spondylodiscitis. (ii) PET scan specific fixation on an aneurism or vascular prosthesis. | Microbiology—(i) Positive culture or PCR of the blood. (ii) Positive Coxiella burnetii serology with IgG1 antibody titer of ≥6,400 mg/dl. Evidence of prosthetic involvement—(i) CT scan or MRI positive for prosthetic infection: collection or pseudotumor of the prosthesis. (ii) PET scan or indium leukocyte scan showing a specific prosthetic hypermetabolism consistent with infection. | Microbiology—(i) Positive culture or positive PCR of the blood. (ii) Positive serology with IgG1 antibody titer of ≥800 mg/dl. Evidence of bone or joint involvement—(i) Clinical arthritis, osteitis, or tenosynovitis. (ii) CT scan or ultrasonography (for joint) or MRI: osteo-articular destruction, joint effusion, intra-articular collection, spondylodiscitis, synovitis, acromio-clavicular localization. (iii) PET scan or indium leukocyte scan showing a specific osteo-articular uptake. | Microbiology—(i) Positive culture or positive PCR of the blood. (ii) Positive serology with IgG antibody titer of ≥800 mg/dl. Evidence of lymph node involvement—(i) Clinical lymphadenitis. (ii) CT scan or ultrasonography (for joint) or MRI: lymphadenitis of >1 cm. (iii) PET scan showing specific lymph node uptake. |
Minor | Predisposing heart condition (known or found on ultrasound). Fever, temp of >38°C. Vascular phenomena, major arterial emboli, septic pulmonary infarcts, mycotic aneurysm (observed during PET scan), intracranial hemorrhage, conjunctival hemorrhages, and Janeway lesions. Immunologic phenomena: glomerulonephritis, Osler's nodes, Roth spots, or rheumatoid factor. Serological evidence: IgG1 antibody titer of ≥800 and <6,400 mg/dl. | Serological IgG1 antibody titer of ≥800 and <6,400 mg/dl. Fever, temp of ≥38°C. Emboli. Underlying vascular predisposition (aneurysm or vascular prosthesis). | Presence of a joint prosthesis (indispensable criterion). Fever, temp of >38°C. Joint pain. Serological evidence: positive C. burnetii serology with IgG1 antibody titer of >800 and <6,400 mg/dl. | Serological IgG1 antibody titer of ≥400 and <800 mg/dl. Fever, temp of ≥38°C. Mono- or polyarthralgia. | Serological IgG1 antibody titer of ≥400 and <800mg/dl. Fever, temp of ≥38°C. |
Diagnoses | |||||
Definite | (i) 1 definite criterion, (ii) 2 major criteria, or (iii) 1 major criterion and 3 minor criteria (including 1 microbiological characteristic and a cardiac predisposition) | (i) 1 definite criterion, (ii) 2 major criteria, or (iii) 1 major criterion and 2 minor criteria (including 1 microbiological characteristic and a vascular predisposition) | (i) 1 definite criterion, (ii) 2 major criteria, or (iii) 1 major criterion and 3 minor criteria (including 1 piece of microbiology evidence and presence of a joint prosthesis) | (i) 1 definite criterion, (ii) 2 major criteria, or (iii) 1 major criterion and 3 minor criteria (including 1 microbiological characteristic) | (i) 1 definite criterion, (ii) 2 major criteria, or (iii) 1 major criterion and 2 minor criteria (including 1 microbiological characteristic) |
Possible | (i) 1 major criterion and 2 minor criteria (including 1 microbiological characteristic and a cardiac predisposition) or (ii) 3 minor criteria (including 1 microbiological characteristic and a cardiac predisposition) | Vascular predisposition, serological evidence, and fever or emboli | (i) 1 major criterion and 2 minor criteria (including 1 piece of microbiology evidence and presence of a joint prosthesis) or (ii) 3 minor criteria (including positive serology and presence of a joint prosthesis) | (i) 1 major criterion and 2 minor criteria or (ii) 3 minor criteria | (i) 1 major criterion and minor criterion or (ii) 2 minor criteria |
For each localization of persistent infection, we defined minor, major, and definite criteria, and association with these criteria leads to definite or possible diagnosis. Definite criteria for Q fever include isolation of C. burnetii in culture or detection by molecular biology or immunochemistry of C. burnetii in the affected organs (Table 3). Major criteria include indirect microbiological evidence of infection (positive serology or positive PCR on blood) associated with compatible morphological abnormalities, with 18 F-FDG PET/CT playing a central role in this setting. Minor criteria associate serological evidence, unspecific clinical signs of infection, and predisposition to the suspected focus of infection (e.g., known vascular aneurysm or graft in the case of C. burnetii vascular infection).
Apart from this corpus of persistent focalized infections with evidence of multiplying C. burnetii, a long-term complication of the infection can manifest as “chronic fatigue syndrome” (CFS) (Fig. 4).
(iii) Prevention strategies and prognosis for C. burnetii infection depend on the definition and understanding of the natural history of the disease.
In a recent publication, the Dutch Q fever consensus group argued against the definition of persistent C. burnetii infections proposed by our team (endocarditis and vascular infections) by comparing definition criteria applied to the patients from the Dutch National Chronic Q fever database (421). They observed that some patients diagnosed with “proven chronic Q fever” in their cohort would have been missed by the criteria proposed by our team. Particularly, six patients from their cohort (4 with endocarditis and 2 with vascular infections) died of “chronic Q fever” and would not have been diagnosed by our alternative criteria. First, this study suffers from a bias, which is the use of our criteria a posteriori, because the definition of patients had already been made from their criteria. Consequently, our criteria could only show lower performances. Moreover, different definitions lead to different management of the infections. In the cases they presented, even if patients had been diagnosed with “chronic Q fever” from their criteria, they died of C. burnetii endocarditis and vascular infections. Indeed, regarding C. burnetii endocarditis, our strategy of systematic echocardiography to detect significant silent valvulopathy and initiating 12 months of prophylactic treatment with doxycycline plus hydroxychloroquine has proven effective (320). In 31 patients followed in our center who were diagnosed with significant valvulopathy during primary infection, 18 patients completed a 12-month course of antibiotic prophylaxis and 13 patients did not. We observed no endocarditis in the group with antibiotic prophylaxis, while all 13 patients who did not receive antibiotic prophylaxis progressed to endocarditis (320). The efficacy of such antibiotic prophylaxis is also illustrated by the fact that we observed a reduction in the incidence of C. burnetii endocarditis in our center over a 27-year period, despite a concomitant increase in the number of diagnosed primary infections (422). We believe that our management strategy would have allowed a lower mortality rate in this cohort of patients, because death due to endocarditis would have been prevented.
Conversely, in the Netherlands, echocardiographic screening of patients with primary C. burnetii infection was abandoned early, due to a 1-year follow-up study by Limonard et al. showing no cases of endocarditis despite detection of valvulopathy in 59% of patients (423). One of the arguments advanced was the unfavorable cost-effectiveness ratio of echocardiography in the context of their epidemic. We consider that such a decision was very premature, given the potential long-term consequences of C. burnetii endocarditis for public health. In another Dutch study, 62% of patients classified as having “proven” or “probable” chronic Q fever had a symptomatic primary infection, with 28% of them having a predisposing valvulopathy and 62% of them having a minor echocardiographic criterion (424). Unfortunately, none of these patients benefited from antibiotic prophylaxis because they were not screened during the primary infection. Recently, Keijmel et al. performed a retrospective case-control study on the diagnosis of acute Q fever in the Netherlands. That study found that 50% of patients with acute Q fever and risk factors (significant valvulopathy) developed endocarditis if no prophylaxis was given (425). This is a worrisome result, since a large number of patients with indication for prophylaxis may have been missed, due to insufficient screening of valvulopathy from the beginning of the epidemic.
We recommend close serological follow-up of all patients with C. burnetii primary infection at 3 and 6 months for early detection of an increase in antibody titers and patient investigation using 18 F-FDG PET-CT. This strategy has been abandoned in some centers in the Netherlands, with a serological control performed only 9 months after primary Q fever (426).
The same controversy exists about the management of C. burnetii infection during pregnancy. We previously described that infection during pregnancy could lead to severe obstetrical and neonatal complications (427, 428). We recently performed a meta-analysis confirming that these infections, although frequently asymptomatic, were associated with miscarriage, fetal death, malformations, and prematurity (148). To avoid these severe complications, we recommend treatment with co-trimoxazole until the eighth month of pregnancy (164). A recent Danish study confirmed such associations, with 47% of pregnant women seropositive for C. burnetii presenting obstetrical complications (miscarriage, preterm delivery, small infant for gestational age, oligohydramnios, fetal growth restriction, or perinatal death) (313). Interestingly, previous large case-control studies in the same country using serological markers of past C. burnetii infection in pregnant women failed to detect an association with obstetrical complications (429, 430). In the Netherlands, a randomized controlled study of serological screening in pregnant women in high-prevalence areas was performed in 2010 and found no advantage of screening in terms of prevention of obstetrical complications (431). As a consequence, systematic screening for C. burnetii infection in pregnant women in high-risk areas was abandoned in the Netherlands. As in the case of endocarditis, this decision seems quite premature, given the available data from the literature. Also, a comment from E. Leshem in 2012 about this strategy noted that this decision could expose unprotected medical personnel (especially obstetrical staff) to infection by inhalation of high concentrations of C. burnetii from the placentas of infected women (432). To date, the consequences of such a strategy are unknown.
Finally, regarding the particular severity of C. burnetii vascular infections, we recently proposed systematic screening for vascular aneurysm in men older than 65 years presenting with primary Q fever. We proposed that a CT scan or abdominal ultrasound (in case of renal contraindication) be performed for these patients in order to initiate prophylactic treatment, similar to what has been done for endocarditis (418).
In conclusion, this controversy illustrates the importance of nosology in the management of infectious diseases. In the particular setting of C. burnetii infection, which has long been considered a rare and mysterious disease, it is necessary to consider updated data resulting from clinical observations in the field. Definitions must play the role of practical tools, assisting clinicians' decisions, and must not consist of misleading terms lacking a microbiological substratum. In the following section we provide a detailed description of each clinical entity caused by C. burnetii infection.
The other current definition criteria for “chronic Q fever.”
As a consequence of this controversy, several different definitions for “chronic” or “persistent focalized” infection can be found in the recent literature. In addition to the definition from the Dutch consensus guidelines and the one proposed by our team, there is a third definition, which was proposed by the CDC in 2013 (Table 4). This definition uses the terms “probable Q fever” and “confirmed chronic Q fever.” “Probable Q fever” is defined by the existence of a clinical presentation compatible with this diagnosis, such as culture-negative endocarditis or vascular aneurysm or graft infection (Table 4), combined with an IgG I titer of <800. “Confirmed Q fever” is defined by the same clinical picture combined with laboratory confirmation with serological titers of >800 or detection of C. burnetii by culture, PCR, or IHC in a clinical sample. Compared to the Dutch definition, it has the advantage of taking into account the suspected localization of the infection as an important criterion. However, it continues to use the term “chronic Q fever,” which we consider to be confusing, now that C. burnetii foci of infection are well described.
TABLE 4.
Category | Description |
---|---|
Indications | Newly recognized culture-negative endocarditis (particularly in a patient with previous valvulopathy or compromised immune system), suspected infection of a vascular aneurysm or vascular prosthesis, or chronic hepatitis, osteomyelitis, osteoarthritis, or pneumonitis in the absence of other known etiology |
Laboratory confirmed | One or more of the following criteria: IgG titer of ≥1:800 to C. burnetii phase I antigen by IFA, detection of C. burnetii DNA in a clinical specimen by PCR, demonstration of C. burnetii in a clinical specimen by IHC, isolation of C. burnetii from a clinical specimen by culture |
Laboratory supportive | ΙFA IgG titer of ≥1:128 and <1:800 to C. burnetii phase I antigen |
Confirmed chronic Q fever | Clinical evidence of infection with laboratory confirmation |
Probable chronic Q fever | Clinical evidence of infection with laboratory supportive results |
Adapted from reference 40.
Clinical Manifestations
Primary infection.
C. burnetii primary infection can manifest itself through a wide diversity of clinical symptoms. The incubation period for the primary infection before the onset of symptoms can last from 2 to 3 weeks, and it depends on the size of the inoculum. In a large proportion of patients, the primary infection can be asymptomatic (433). In other cases, pneumonia, hepatitis, or flu-like syndrome can be observed.
However, these extremely polymorphic features of C. burnetii primary infection are not predictive of the development of long-term complications, such as persistent focalized infection or chronic fatigue syndrome (Fig. 4).
This issue has been raised by a recent study in the Netherlands. The European Union case definition for reporting Q fever used during the outbreak prevented the reporting of asymptomatic cases, leading to an underestimation of the true burden of the disease (407, 434) and to a probable significant lack of prevention of long-term complications for at-risk patients.
The determinants of the symptomatology in C. burnetii primary infection depend on host factors and on the strain involved. Tissot-Dupont et al. long ago showed the role of age and sex in the clinical expression, with older men being more frequently symptomatic than young women and pregnant women (413, 435). This was recently illustrated during the Netherlands epidemic, with symptomatic patients being significantly older and more often men than asymptomatic patients (407). Children are also less frequently symptomatic than adults (310). The role of immunosuppression in the severity of C. burnetii primary infection is not well defined. An old report of an outbreak in a residential facility for drug users in Italy suggested that respiratory signs were more frequent in HIV-positive patients and that the incidence of infection was significantly higher in this population (436). A study in Marseilles also suggested a more frequently symptomatic primary infection in HIV patients than in the general population (437). However, other studies have shown a similar seroprevalence of primary C. burnetii infection in HIV and non-HIV patients, with no significant difference in terms of symptomatology (438–440). In Cayenne, French Guiana, patients with C. burnetii community-acquired pneumonia were not more frequently diabetic, HIV positive, or on corticosteroid treatment than patients with community-acquired pneumonia of other etiologies (80). A recent study among patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the Netherlands found no difference in seroprevalence or symptomatology in patients on anti-TNF-α therapy (441).
The strain of C. burnetii involved is the second determinant of the clinical manifestations of primary infection. This phenomenon can be illustrated by the example of the MST 17 clone, the unique genotype responsible for C. burnetii infection in Cayenne, French Guiana. This clone causes higher rates of symptomatic cases than clones from metropolitan France. In a recent outbreak in a military camp, it was shown that 100% of contaminated patients were symptomatic, illustrating the particular virulence of this genotype (unpublished data).
(i) Asymptomatic and pauci-symptomatic primary infection.
Classically, it is stated that approximately 60% of individuals are asymptomatic during C. burnetii primary infection (433). Mild symptomatic forms resemble a common cold and are often diagnosed retrospectively or during outbreaks through systematic testing. This phenomenon was soon illustrated by the discrepancy between seroprevalence studies and rates of symptomatic cases of Q fever during early outbreaks in Montana and Switzerland (442, 443). A more recent study performed in Denmark showed a rate of 64% of patients with asymptomatic primary infection (444). In the Netherlands, Hogema et al. found a rate of 12.2% of blood donors positive for anti-Coxiella IgG, resulting in an incidence rate of seroconversion of 5.7% per year, which is more than 10 times higher than the local number of symptomatic diagnosed cases per year in this region (445). This issue is of particular concern in these settings of epidemicity, since it has been demonstrated that C. burnetii can survive and remain infectious for several weeks in stored human blood samples (132).
(ii) Acute Q fever: isolated febrile syndrome or flu-like illness.
In acute Q fever with isolated febrile syndrome or flu-like illness, the abrupt onset of high fever (often up to 40°C) is the predominant sign, which can last for more than 15 days and is frequently associated with myalgia and headache, mostly retro-orbital (433, 446). It was the most frequent clinical presentation in reported acute Q fever patients during the outbreak in the Netherlands (423). This nonspecific presentation is misleading and supports the fact that clinicians should include screening for C. burnetii primary infection in the presence of an isolated fever of unknown origin. Specific examination is crucial in this context, searching for epidemiological risk factors (rural setting, occupation, and contact with ruminants or parturient mammals).
(iii) Acute Q fever: pneumonia.
The prevalence of pneumonia during primary infection is highly variable. In Cayenne, French Guiana, C. burnetii MST 17 is responsible for the highest rate of community-acquired pneumonia in the world (around 40%) (238). It is also the predominant presentation in the Maritime provinces of Canada (447), northern Spain (448), Croatia (449), and the Netherlands (72). In Cameroon, C. burnetii was responsible for up to 10% of community-acquired pneumonia (60, 450, 451). During the Netherlands epidemic, pneumonia was present in up to 86% of hospitalized patients with acute Q fever (452).
Q fever pneumonia usually presents in middle-aged men, often with no comorbid conditions (446). Acute pneumonia typically combines fever, cough, dyspnea, and auscultation abnormalities. It is frequently associated with extrapulmonary signs, such as myalgia, arthralgia, relative bradycardia, sore throat, chills, vomiting, abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhea, or constipation (446, 453, 454). Patients are also more likely to complain of headache (80, 452), with some reports mentioning the headache as “the most severe pain they ever had” (446). This sign has been reported in up to 40.5% of patients with C. burnetii primary infection (455). Less frequently, a skin rash or neurological signs can be observed (confusion, prostration, or Guillain-Barré syndrome) (446, 452).
Regarding laboratory findings, leukocyte counts are generally normal or low compared with those in pneumonia caused by other microorganisms (80, 446, 452, 456). Conversely, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels are typically high (452) and significantly higher than in other pneumonias (80, 425). In a report from the Netherlands, elevated liver enzymes were reported in 32.3% of patients (452), and this was also reported in 60% of patients with acute Q fever in Croatia (449).
Radiological findings are highly polymorphic. Several reports found rounded opacities (446, 457, 458) with a halo sign suggestive of an angio-invasive process, but classical interstitial or segmental opacities involving the lower lobes are also common (459). CT scanning has shown lobar, segmental, multilobar, or patchy involvement, sometimes associated with lymph node enlargement (446). More severe forms, such as necrotizing pneumonia, have been described in the immunocompromised patient (458). Pleural effusions are also described (80, 458) and have been reported in 9.9% of patients with C. burnetii pneumonia from Europe and North America (460). Exceptional cases of lung pseudotumor have been described (394, 461, 462), with a good response to doxycycline.
The prognosis of C. burnetii pneumonia is usually favorable, with resolution of symptoms within 30 days (446). In the Netherlands, patients hospitalized for C. burnetii pneumonia had significantly lower CURB-65 scores than patients with other community-acquired pneumonias (452). However, respiratory distress syndrome leading to death can occur and has been described in Cayenne, French Guiana (80). The mortality rate reported in the Netherlands was approximately 1% in two studies (452, 463). Death was more frequent in patients with comorbidities.
(iv) Acute Q fever: hepatitis.
Isolated hepatitis is a frequent presentation of acute Q fever. It is more frequent than pneumonia in countries where the disease is endemic, such as France (238), Spain (464), Israel (453), Portugal (459), and Taiwan (454, 465). Elevated liver enzymes are associated in almost all cases with fever, chills, and headache (465). Headache was even proposed in early reports for differentiating C. burnetii hepatitis from viral hepatitis (466). Other accompanying findings are anorexia, vomiting, and sometimes diarrhea and painful hepatomegaly (238, 453, 459, 464). Jaundice is rare, but it has been reported in severe hepatitis, especially in Taiwan, where hyperbilirubinemia was found in more than one-third (37%) of cases (465). In that study, patients with jaundice presented a significant delay in reduction of fever after initiation of antibiotic therapy compared to patients without jaundice (11.5 versus 5.0 days; P = 0.002) (465). Globally, the mean duration of fever decrease after initiation of adequate antimicrobial therapy in Taiwanese patients was 10 days, and 8 patients experienced a fever lasting more than 28 days (465). This particular feature may explain the confusion in early reports between what could be considered acute or chronic Q fever hepatitis (467). In developing countries where coinfection with viral hepatitis is high, clinical manifestations of C. burnetii hepatitis do not seem to be more severe, but further studies are needed to evaluate this feature, since only one retrospective study in Taiwan has been performed on this presentation (468). When performed, positron emission tomography can reveal an intense diffuse uptake of the whole hepatic parenchyma (469, 470), helping to establish the diagnosis in the case of fever of unknown origin.
When liver biopsy is performed, granulomatous hepatitis and typical “doughnut” granulomas are found (86). However, atypical pathological aspects have been reported recently, such as like epithelioid granuloma with eosinophilic infiltration, extensive extravasated fibrin without ring granuloma and acute cholangitis without granuloma (365). The prognosis of C. burnetii acute hepatitis is good. Fatal cases due to hepatic insufficiency are very rare and have been reported in a child (471), or in patients with cancer or alcoholism (472, 473).
(v) Acute Q fever: cardiac involvement.
(a) Pericarditis.
Acute pericarditis accounted for approximately 1% of Q fever cases diagnosed in our center (474) in the 1980s. This presentation has been reported as mimicking a lupus-like syndrome (475). The diagnosis of C. burnetii pericarditis has been improved with the use of a systematic prescription kit in our center (476), revealing that Q fever was involved in 24% of 81 cases of pericarditis investigated over an 8-year period (477). That study suggested that C. burnetii pericarditis is not as rare as previously postulated. The severity of these cases of pericarditis is variable, with reported cases of life-threatening tamponade (478) and some constrictive cases (478, 479).
(b) Myocarditis.
Acute myocarditis is a life-threatening and fortunately rare form of primary infection. A total of 23 cases of acute myocarditis are reported in the English literature, (459, 474, 480–484), of which one involved a child (485). It represents 0.5% to 1% of cases diagnosed in our laboratory (305, 474). Among these 23 cases, 7 deaths (30%) were reported, illustrating the poor prognosis of this focalized infection. Although it is a rare manifestation, acute Q fever should be considered in the diagnosis of acute myocarditis because appropriate treatment may significantly improve the prognosis of this potentially fatal localization.
(c) Acute endocarditis.
C. burnetii endocarditis is still considered the archetype of “chronic” Q fever. However, we recently reported cases of “acute endocarditis” (416). We observed a transient 10-mm aortic vegetation in a patient with primary Q fever, associated with high levels of IgG anticardiolipin (aCL) 1 week after fever onset. This patient had no past medical history of valvular heart disease (VHD). This case prompted us to investigate this clinical presentation in patients followed in our National Referral Center and to compare this syndrome with classical primary Q fever in patients with or without preexisting VHD but without vegetation. We found 9 patients presenting features of “acute endocarditis” (416). All vegetations were localized to the aortic valve. Patients presented various associated clinical features such as isolated fever, pneumonia, or hepatitis. Regarding the prognosis, one patient died after 15 months from mesenteric infarction (long after successful treatment of primary Q fever), six patients progressed to C. burnetii persistent endocarditis, and two patients never fulfilled the criteria for persistent endocarditis and were treated for 12 months. The comparison between “acute endocarditis” and the other categories of primary infections found that predictors for this condition were immunosuppression and very high levels of IgG aCL (>100 IgG phospholipid units [GPLU]). The pathophysiological scenario for this new entity would be that C. burnetii primary infection causes an explosive secretion of autoantibodies, including IgG aCL, causing autoimmune valvular lesions. Further studies are needed to confirm and further characterize the features of this new clinical entity.
(vi) Acute Q fever: neurological signs.
Neurological involvement is rare and can be observed alone or combined with other organ involvement. A total of 14 references concerning this presentation are found in the English literature, consisting mainly of case reports or small series (304, 474, 486–497). Apart from headache, which is a common sign in acute Q fever, revealing a possible neurological tropism of the bacterium (455), more severe manifestations such as meningitis and meningoencephalitis have been reported. Among 1,383 Q fever infections diagnosed in our reference center between 1985 and 1998, 1% had meningoencephalitis and 0.7% had meningitis alone (474). In a Greek report of 121 patients with Q fever consisting mainly of acute pneumonia, 4.1% presented with confusion and 0.8% had meningitis (455). Meningoencephalitis appears to be the most frequent acute severe neurological complication and can sometimes be the only manifestation of the disease, followed by meningitis and peripheral myelitis (491). Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings show lymphocytic meningitis. Postinfectious neurological signs probably related to immunological disorders have been described, such as peripheral sensory neuropathy or Guillain-Barré syndrome (488, 490), with a good response to steroid therapy. The use of fluoroquinolones, which have good cerebrospinal penetration, has been proposed for treatment of C. burnetii meningitis (495).
(vii) Acute Q fever: rare clinical manifestations.
(a) Dermatological signs.
Cutaneous involvement was present in 4% of patients diagnosed with acute Q fever in our laboratory between 1985 and 1998 (474), and recent acute Q fever series have reported a prevalence ranging from 1% in the Netherlands, (452) to 9% in Israel (449, 453, 454, 498). These manifestations consist mainly of maculopapular or vesicular exanthema and sometimes purpuric lesions (474). Cases of granulomatous panniculitis (499) and erythema nodosum have also been reported (366, 500, 501).
(b) Bone marrow involvement.
Although rarely reported, bone marrow lesions were already described in very old reports. The pathological analysis of bone marrow biopsy specimens shows a typical “doughnut” or “fibrin ring” granuloma during C. burnetii primary infection (253, 367–369, 469, 502–508). Also, a single case of bone marrow necrosis following acute Q fever was reported in 1980 (509). Hemophagocytic syndrome can be a consequence of bone marrow involvement. This clinical presentation was reported for the first time in 1984 by Estrov et al. (510), and since then fewer than 10 cases have been reported (511–513), with the most recent involving an asplenic patient (514). 18 F-FDG PET/CT, which is less invasive than bone marrow biopsy, can detect bone marrow involvement. A case of diffuse bone marrow increased uptake in the context of primary C. burnetii infection has been reported recently (515), and we found 11 patients with bone marrow hypermetabolism in the context of acute Q fever (412).
(c) Acute lymphadenitis.
Thirteen cases of acute Q fever lymphadenitis have been described, involving cervical, axillary, mediastinal, abdominal, or inguinal lymph nodes and associated with fever, headache, pneumonia, or hepatitis (458, 516–521). Also, in a recent study concerning the clinical relevance of 18 F-FDG PET/CT in C. burnetii infection, we observed seven cases of lymphadenitis in the context of primary Q fever, associated with bone marrow, lung, or splenic hypermetabolism. One patient with acute lymphadenitis was subsequently diagnosed with lymphoma (334).
(d) Cholecystitis.
Cases of acute acalculous cholecystitis have been reported (522–527). A total of nine cases are reported in the literature. Patients present with right upper quadrant pain and fever. Abdominal CT scanning shows a diffuse symmetrically thickened and hypodense gallbladder. The diagnosis was made by serology in all cases. Six of the patients underwent cholecystectomy, and the pathology review showed associated fibrin ring granulomas in the liver for three of them. In one case, C. burnetii was detected by qPCR in the gallbladder (524).
(e) Autoimmunity.
Biological markers of autoimmunity are frequently present in acute Q fever. Anti-smooth muscle antibodies, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), and antinuclear and antiphospholipid antibodies have been detected during acute Q fever (292, 475, 475, 528–531). Lefebvre et al. have reported a series of seven cases of C. burnetii infection that could have been confused at initial presentation with Goodpasture's syndrome, Crohn's disease, Still's disease, polymyalgia rheumatica, polyarteritis nodosa, essential type II cryoglobulinemia, and giant-cell arteritis (531). Other authors have reported two cases mimicking exacerbations of systemic lupus erythematosus (475, 532).
Cases with positive antiphospholipid antibodies complicated by thrombophlebitis have been reported. This suggests that most clinical features of the antiphospholipid syndrome can be found in acute Q fever with laboratory classification criteria for the antiphospholipid syndrome (lupus anticoagulant and anticardiolipin antibody of IgG and/or IgM isotype) (686, 687; M. Million, N. Bardin, S. Bessis, N. Nouiakh, C. Douliery, S. Edouard, E. Angelakis, K. Griffiths, A. Bosseray, O. Epaulard, S. Branger, D. Chaudier, K. Blanc-Laserre, N. Ferreira-Maldent, E. Demonchy, F. Roblot, J. Reynes, F. Djossou, C. Protopopescu, P. Carrieri, H. Lepidi, L. Camoin-Jau, J.-L. Mege, and D. Raoult, unpublished data). Also, in the primary C. burnetii infection, high levels of IgG aCL antibodies and VHD have been associated with progression to persistent endocarditis (295). Rare cases of Q fever associated with amyloidosis (533) or mixed cryoglobulinemia (531, 534) are reported in the literature. Two case of Jarisch-Herxheimer reactions following the treatment of a C. burnetii pneumonia or endocarditis have been reported (535, 536).
C. burnetii persistent focalized infections.
(i) Endocarditis.
Q fever endocarditis is the most frequently reported form of persistent C. burnetii infection in the literature. It is the most frequent persistent form in France (340) and the second most frequent one in the Netherlands (78). In Brazil, C. burnetii was found to be the etiological agent in approximately 10% of blood culture-negative endocarditis cases (685). In Israel, 9.6% of patients undergoing valve replacement for endocarditis had a C. burnetii infection (537). C. burnetii endocarditis has also been reported in 8.3% of 60 patients diagnosed with bacterial endocarditis in Thailand (538). In Africa, it represents from 1% to 3% of infective endocarditis in cohort studies (450). However, its prevalence is probably underestimated in most developing countries, where microbiological tools for diagnosis are lacking.
Factors associated with progression to endocarditis after primary infection are male sex, age above 40 years, and, most importantly, underlying valvular heart disease, even if clinically silent at diagnosis (320). The incidence of endocarditis after acute Q fever in patients with valvulopathy has been estimated to be 39% (539). Having a valvular prosthesis (mechanical or bioprosthesis) represents the most important risk factor, as initially reported by Fenollar et al. (539). Also, even minor valvulopathies are at risk, with the highest risk for aortic bicuspidy, followed by mitral valve prolapse and minimal valvular leaks (414, 540). Given the fact that the prevalence of bicuspidy has been estimated to be 1% to 2% in the general population, screening for this valvulopathy is of particular importance in patients with primary Q fever (541). Regarding more severe valvulopathy, aortic regurgitation is at higher risk than mitral regurgitation and aortic stenosis (320). Also, three cases of C. burnetii infection of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices and a single case of C. burnetii infection of an intracardiac thrombus mimicking atrial myxoma have been reported to date (412, 542, 543).
The clinical presentation of C. burnetii endocarditis is nonspecific, and patients can present symptoms such as isolated relapsing fever, chills, night sweats, weight loss, and hepatosplenomegaly (433). Sudden cardiac insufficiency, stroke, or other embolic signs are also presentations of the disease (415). Mycotic aneurysms resulting from endocarditis can occur and must be distinguished from isolated vascular infection of a preexisting aneurysm (418, 544). Laboratory signs can consist of a persistent inflammatory syndrome and hyperleukocytosis or, on the contrary, pancytopenia (539, 545). Cases of coinfection with Enterococcus faecalis, Streptococcus mitis, and Streptococcus gallolyticus have been reported (415, 546–548).
Million et al. have reported presentations with valvular vegetations in only 30% of cases and discovery or worsening of a valvular insufficiency in 75% of cases, illustrating the difficulty in the diagnosis of Q fever endocarditis (415). This is illustrated by a study in Marseilles, where systematic screening of 6,401 patients undergoing valve surgery yielded an unexpected diagnosis of C. burnetii endocarditis in 14 patients (0.2%) (549). Also, Tyler et al. recently reported a case of C. burnetii endocarditis incidentally discovered during routine valve replacement in a patient with unexplained pancytopenia and splenomegaly (545), and similar cases were reported in the Netherlands by Kampschreur et al. (550). In most patients, the infection can be latent for years, while C. burnetii progressively destroys heart valves, causing irreversible damage (549). Million et al. have shown that high levels of IgG aCL during acute Q fever were associated with the presence of a valvulopathy and a predictive biomarker of progression to persistent endocarditis (295). In particular, IgG aCL levels higher than 90 IU were strongly associated with endocarditis.
Serological IgG1 titers of >1,600 are associated with endocarditis (340), and this cutoff has been added in the modified Duke criteria for endocarditis. However, some cases of endocarditis with IgG1 titers of <800 have been described (341), so that this criterion alone is not sufficiently accurate for diagnosis. Specific qPCR on blood or serum is positive in about 30% of cases, and blood culture is positive in 14% (415). The analysis of resected valves by culture, qPCR, immunohistochemistry, and pathology shows variable performances (from 0% to 87% positivity), depending on the time the resections are performed in relation to treatment.
Pathological examination of cardiac valves may reveal fibrosis and calcification, slight inflammation and vascularization, and minimal or absent vegetation (328). These signs can be confused with noninfectious cardiac valve damage, so immunohistochemical analysis is helpful to confirm the diagnosis (328).
18 F-FDG PET/CT scanning has been used as a new tool for detecting infected valves in C. burnetii endocarditis, and it seems to be particularly useful when no vegetation is present and in cases of prosthetic valve infection. Barten et al. have reported four cases of C. burnetii endocarditis, all with hypermetabolism in a prosthetic valve (551). A case report from Australia describes the diagnosis and follow-up of C. burnetii endocarditis in a patient with aortic bicuspidy with an 18 F-FDG PET/CT-scan (552). Also, the diagnosis of C. burnetii infection of a Bentall graft or prosthetic mitral or aortic valve with 18 F-FDG PET/CT scanning has been reported (553, 554). In a recent retrospective study from our center of 99 patients with C. burnetii infection and a positive 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan, we observed 21 patients with hypermetabolism of a cardiac valve, with a majority of them involving a prosthetic valve (66%) (412).
Because there is no pathognomonic sign or accurate paraclinical tool for the diagnosis of C. burnetii endocarditis, new criteria have recently been proposed, inspired by the modified Duke criteria (Table 3), incorporating PCR and culture on blood samples, echocardiography, and 18 F-FDG PET/CT scanning as major diagnostic criteria (410).
The prognosis of C. burnetii endocarditis has considerably improved because of earlier diagnosis and appropriate dual-antibiotic therapy. In the Netherlands, Kampschreur et al. found mortality rates of 9.3% for C. burnetii endocarditis, (78) with acute presentation (severe endocarditis) being associated with a poor outcome. In our center, we found mortality rates of about 5% at 3 years, and factors independently associated with death were age, stroke, and prosthetic valve at diagnosis (415). At 1 year of follow-up, the absence of a 4-fold decrease of IgG1 and IgGA and persistence of IgM were also associated with death (415). We recommend performing systematic echocardiography in patients diagnosed with primary Q fever to detect any predisposing valvular lesions and, if such lesions are detected, providing regular monitoring and prophylactic treatment with doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine (540). We have demonstrated retrospectively in our cohort from the National Referral Center that this strategy is effective in preventing progression to endocarditis in all patients with valvulopathy who underwent complete treatment (320). Conversely, patients diagnosed with primary Q fever and valvulopathy who did not follow this prophylaxis systematically progressed to endocarditis (320).
(ii) Vascular infections.
An increasing number of reports of C. burnetii vascular infections have been published in the last decade, mainly due to the outbreak in the Netherlands (78, 371, 405, 417, 551, 555–575). At present, it is the most frequent form of persistent infection reported in the Netherlands (371, 405, 417, 418, 553, 557–577). In that country, a seroprevalence study among patients with abdominal aortic/iliac aneurysm detected C. burnetii antibodies in 16.7% of them, of which 30% had serological titers suggesting persistent vascular infection (562). In France, it is the second most prevalent site of persistent infection after endocarditis (417, 474). In our center, we observed an increase in the incidence of vascular infections in the last 5 years compared to the 22 preceding years (418). This may be due to several factors: systematic screening of patients with aneurysm and vascular graft for whom biological samples are available in our laboratory, elaboration of a diagnostic score (Table 2), and new diagnostic tools such as the 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan (412). No data exist regarding prevalence in other countries, because the literature consists mainly of case reports.
These infections develop after C. burnetii primary infection when a preexisting lesion is present on a vessel, such as an aneurysm or vascular graft. The most frequent localization is the abdominal and thoracic aortas (417). Because C. burnetii vascular infections are latent and initially present with unspecific symptoms (weight loss or unexplained fever in a patient with an aneurysm or vascular graft), in the majority of the reported cases the diagnosis was made when complications occurred. The main complications are aortoduodenal fistulas (555, 558, 568) leading to catastrophic hemorrhage, spondylodiscitis (417, 565, 575) often associated with psoas abscesses (418), graft or aneurysm rupture (417), (78) and embolic complications (78, 417, 557). A single case of coinfection with Yersinia enterocolitica has been reported (411). The overall prognosis is poor, with mortality rates between 18% and 26% (78, 417, 418). In a recent Dutch study, the presence of vascular Q fever infection was significantly associated with mortality (78) in a cohort of patients with “chronic” Q fever.
As is the case for endocarditis, the diagnosis of vascular infection is challenging. IgG1 titers of >6,400 were observed in 45% of patients from our center, and the median IgG1 level was 3,200 (418). Specific qPCR on blood samples was positive in only 14% of patients. Culture and qPCR on vascular samples were positive in 58% and 91% of cases, respectively, sometimes after several months of antibiotic treatment (418). Pathological analysis of the vascular wall can show necrotizing granulomas (564). 18 F-FDG PET/CT scans have also been used on this indication in a total of 36 patients (of which 19 patients had a vascular graft) (411, 551). This exam has the advantage of detecting other sites of infection that are frequently associated, such as spondylodiscitis and psoas abscess.
To improve the early diagnosis of these infections, proposed diagnostic criteria with PCR, culture, serology, CT scanning showing an aneurysm or vascular prosthesis, and 18 F-FDG PET/CT scanning showing aneurysm or graft hypermetabolism were included as major criteria (410) (Table 3).
(iii) Osteoarticular infections.
Bone and joint C. burnetii infections were considered a rare entity, occurring in 2% of Q fever cases in initial series (474). However, they have been increasingly reported in the last decade. Osteomyelitis, often multifocal, seems to be more a frequent presentation in children, with a total of 11 cases reported in the literature (577–583). In adults, the clinical presentation is more variable. Isolated osteomyelitis seems to be much less frequent, with only 2 cases in the literature, one involving the cheek (584) (but this case would not fulfill current criteria for C. burnetii osteoarticular infection because of the absence of microbiological proof and low IgG1 titers) and one bilateral tibio-femoral osteomyelitis in a 49-year-old man with a doughnut granuloma and serological titers compatible with persistent infection (585). Six cases of isolated spondylodiscitis (not associated with endocarditis or vascular infection) have been reported (412, 474, 586, 587). A total of eight cases of culture-negative prosthetic joint arthritis have been reported, seven of them involving the hip and one involving the knee (412, 419, 420).
Other localizations include tenosynovitis of the wrist (2 cases) (586) and of the tibia (1 case) (412), subacromial bursitis (3 cases) (412, 419), and coxitis, sacroiliitis, arthritis of the ankle and shoulder (412, 419, 474). The use of an 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan has been reported for C. burnetii osteoarticular infections, and we have proposed diagnostic criteria for prosthetic joint arthritis and other osteoarticular infections (412, 419, 420) (Table 3).
(iv) Persistent lymphadenitis.
A total of 18 cases of persistent focalized lymphadenitis have been reported (334, 412, 517). One case was associated with a diagnosis of lymphoma. Four cases of isolated persistent lymphadenitis were diagnosed with 18 F-FDG PET/CT scanning. Other cases were isolated (2 cases) or associated with endocarditis (1 case), vascular infections (4 cases), or osteoarticular infections (6 cases) (412). We recently developed a diagnostic score for C. burnetii persistent lymphadenitis (412) (Table 3).
C. burnetii Infection in Special Populations: Pregnant Women and Children
C. burnetii infection during pregnancy.
Primary infection in pregnant women is most often asymptomatic (413). However, poor obstetrical outcomes have been described, mainly when C. burnetii infection occurs during the first trimester (428, 588). Seroprevalence studies in pregnant women show very variable rates in areas of endemicity: 0.15% in southeastern France (589), 3.8% in Canada (590), and 4.6% in London, United Kingdom (591). In Denmark, a seroprevalence rate of up to 47% was reported in pregnant women who were occupationally exposed to livestock, versus 4.8% in unexposed women (592). During the outbreak in the Netherlands, seroprevalence rates between 3.4% (593) and 9% were reported in high-prevalence areas, with a statistically significant correlation with proximity to an infected dairy goat farm (594).
Various obstetrical complications have been reported in pregnant women infected with C. burnetii, such as miscarriage, fetal death, malformations (omphalocele, hypospadias, Potter syndrome, congenital hydronephrosis, and syndactyly), growth retardation, oligohydramnios, and premature delivery (148, 164, 428). A case of nosocomial transmission between 2 women in an obstetrical ward has been reported (131), probably due to dissemination of spores from birth products. Prevention of nosocomial transmission consists of precautions such as wearing masks and gloves during placental manipulation and isolation in a single room for infected pregnant women (428, 432). The mechanism of early abortion involves placental abruption due to placentitis (428, 595), and C. burnetii can be isolated from the infected placenta (164).
Obstetrical complications have been reported mainly in case series from France, Spain, Canada, and Australia (148, 590, 595–599), while recent large-scale population-based serological studies from Germany (600), Denmark (429, 430), and the Netherlands (431, 593) have shown no increased risk of adverse obstetrical outcomes in seropositive pregnant women (601). A recent meta-analysis from our team of 136 cases and 7 population-based studies confirmed some key points: seropositivity and untreated Q fever during pregnancy are associated with fetal death, and antibiotic treatment prevents this complication (148). The discrepancy in previous studies can be explained by several factors. First, Angelakis et al. found that C. burnetii strains harboring the QpDV plasmid were associated with an increased risk of abortion, suggesting that genotypes from different geographical areas could induce different rates of obstetrical complications (164). Second, contradictory results in studies from the Netherlands and Denmark may be due to bias in study design. For example, in Denmark, the same authors observed poor obstetrical outcomes in a case series (313, 602) and no increased risk of adverse pregnancy events in population-based serological studies (429, 430).
C. burnetii infection in children.
Specific studies of clinical manifestations of Q fever in children are few. Globally, children are more frequently asymptomatic than adults and tend to present less symptomatic forms of the primary infection. Seroprevalence studies in the general child populations from different geographical areas are available and show very variable rates of seropositivity (603). In Queensland, Australia (413), a seropositivity rate of 2.5% has been found in children <15 years (604). In West Africa, a recent study found a seroprevalence rate for Q fever of 8.3% among 796 children (605). An early Japanese study found 32.7% seropositivity among 55 school children with an influenza-like syndrome (606).
Regarding clinical manifestations, a recent study in the Netherlands of 49 children revealed that the top five clinical symptoms of primary infection were influenza-like syndrome, lower and upper respiratory tract infection, malaise, and digestive signs (gastroenteritis-like symptoms). The outcome was favorable in all cases. To date, no case of persistent C. burnetii infection has been reported in children in the Netherlands, but based on the prevalence of congenital heart disease, at least 13 children in the highest-prevalence area may be at risk of developing endocarditis (603). As is the case in adults, the clinical presentation of primary infection is not specific and can mimic other classical childhood infections, and testing for Q fever is rarely performed by pediatricians (607).
However, cases of hepatitis, meningoencephalitis, pericarditis, myocarditis, lymphadenitis, skin rash, rhabdomyolysis, and hemolytic-uremic syndrome in children caused by C. burnetii primary infection have been reported (304, 310, 608–614).
The most frequently reported persistent infection in children is osteomyelitis, which is frequently multifocal, with evidence of granulomatous bone lesions (577–583). Cases of endocarditis have been described mainly in children with congenital heart disease (187, 310, 615). One case of infection of a bovine jugular vein conduit graft (616) and one case of multiple recurrent abscesses (617) have also been described.
Other Related Clinical Syndromes
Ischemic stroke and atherosclerosis.
Recently, a case-control study was conducted in Spain among patients aged >65 years presenting with ischemic stroke (618). Positive serology for persistent C. burnetii infection was found in 14.5% of cases and 6% of controls (P < 0.004). This association was conserved when adjusted for age, sex, and cardiovascular risk factors. Further studies are needed to investigate this association. The same authors found an association between past serological evidence of C. burnetii infection and cardiovascular atherosclerosis in the elderly (619). Before that, Lovey et al. had already found an association in a Swiss cohort between primary C. burnetii infection and the risk of developing a cerebrovascular accident and cardiac ischemia (620).
Lymphoma.
Our team has recently demonstrated that C. burnetii infection is associated with an increased risk of lymphoma (334). Before that study, 22 cases of lymphoproliferative disease in the context of Q fever were available in the literature (621–624). A patient who was followed in our center for a C. burnetii vascular infection was diagnosed with B-cell lymphoma, and C. burnetii was detected in the lymphoma tissue. Therefore, we performed a retrospective study among all patients diagnosed in the French national reference center with Q fever to search for other cases of C. burnetii-associated lymphoma. A total of seven cases were found, presenting mature B-cell lymphoma (6 diffuse and one low-grade B-cell lymphoma). An excess risk of diffuse B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma was found in Q fever patients compared to the general population (standardized incidence ratios [95% confidence intervals {CI}], 25.4 [11.4 to 56.4] and 6.7 [0.9 to 47.9], respectively). Moreover, patients with C. burnetii persistent focalized infections were more at risk of lymphadenitis and progression to lymphoma (odds ration [OR], 14.54; 95% CI, 2.14 to 337.7; P = 0.007). Consequently, C. burnetii may be a cofactor for lymphoma, and the possible mechanism could be the infection of monocytes and dendritic cells, causing impairment of the immune system leading to lymphoma.
CFS.
Chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) is usually described several years after primary infection with C. burnetii. The symptoms are characterized by persistent fatigue following a primary infection with no sign of persistent infection, and it has been described as Q fever fatigue syndrome (QFS). Nevertheless, cautious analysis of the literature is necessary regarding QFS, because the definition of this syndrome has been variable through the years. In particular, the first case-control studies from Australia and the UK showed a wide range of clinical signs, such as persistent fatigue, increased sweating, blurred vision, arthralgia, alcohol intolerance, breathlessness, or enlarged painful lymph nodes (625, 626). Moreover, no details are given about serological follow-up, so that symptoms attributed to QFS could in fact be related to undiagnosed persistent C. burnetii infection. This is illustrated by the study by Wildman et al. that took place 10 years after an outbreak in the UK. Among the 108 patients followed, some died of aneurysm rupture and endocarditis with cardiac failure, suggesting possible undiagnosed persistent infection, but no data were given about serological titers for these patients (627). In some studies, confusion between “chronic Q fever” and QFS is really tangible, because a proportion of the patients have a positive PCR for C. burnetii on blood samples or high IgA1 levels, so that no conclusion, in particular about the efficacy of antibiotics in this syndrome, can be drawn from them (628–631).
However, even if these studies suffer from bias, all have shown a significantly higher frequency of patients reporting fatigue after a primary C. burnetii infection than that found in healthy controls. Moreover, two studies have reported significant rates of C. burnetii seropositivity in cohorts of patients with CFS (27% and 17%) (632, 633). In these first studies, patients were tested with questionnaires inspired from the CFS criteria of the CDC (1994) (634). CFS was defined as a fatigue lasting for 6 months or more with elimination of somatic disease (hypothyroidism, narcolepsy, sleep apnea, drugs, chronic viral hepatitis, alcoholism, psychiatric trouble, or obesity) (634).
More recent studies have used a battery of different validated tests for evaluation of health status (SF-36, Chalder fatigue scale score, SF-12, MFI, SOMS, CDC-SI, Whiteley index, F-Sozu, and OQ-45) with duration of follow-up from 27 months to 6 years. They found a higher frequency (from 32% to 54%) of fatigue symptoms and impaired quality of life in patients who had experienced an episode of primary Q fever than in healthy controls (635–637). Strauss et al. also found that patients with fatigue symptoms following Q fever in Germany were more frequently subject to hypochondriacal worries and beliefs and somatization (637). However, Thomas et al. found no significant association between C. burnetii seropositivity and psychiatric morbidity in a retrospective cohort of farmers from the UK (638).
Regarding the pathophysiological explanation for this syndrome, Helbig et al. found a significantly increased frequency of HLA-DRB1*11 in patients with QFS, suggesting an immunological mechanism, depending on the host susceptibility (639, 640). Similarly, Pentilla et al. found that peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from patients with CFS exhibited higher levels of IL-6 secretion than those from controls when stimulated with C. burnetii antigens (285). Other studies failed to identify specific patterns of immune gene expression in QFS (641, 642). Some studies from the UK have tried to identify antigenic residual particles in patients with QFS. However, the results are doubtful, since some of them are based on the detection of C. burnetii by PCR (643, 644), suggesting rather persistent C. burnetii infection, and this hypothesis was not confirmed in the follow-up of patients in the UK (636).
A more recent body of literature concerning QFS has been available since the Netherlands outbreak. Interest in this pathology was increased during and after the outbreak, not only in the scientific world. Thus, the real prevalence of this syndrome in this situation is difficult to evaluate. In an outbreak situation such as the one experienced in the Netherlands, sudden media coverage about a new disease can be stressful, and various information and rumors can easily circulate within social networks. As a consequence, and because primary Q fever can be asymptomatic, a higher proportion of patients having a great diversity of subjective symptoms could attribute their malaise to Q fever. For that reason, efforts have been made to use the most standardized tools possible for the diagnosis of QFS. The authors of the first studies used the Nijmegen Clinical Screening Instrument (NCSI) for assessment of the patient's health status. This is an empirically validated battery of tests evaluating functional impairment, subjective symptoms, and quality of life (645). In these studies, patients with possible, probable, or proven “chronic Q fever” were excluded. Limonard et al. investigated the health status of 82 patients with a past primary infection at 1 and 4 years of follow-up and found a higher frequency of severely impaired general quality of life and undue fatigue (50% and 46%, respectively) than in an adjusted control group (645, 646). These proportions were stable through the years. Morroy et al. identified 58.9% of patients with abnormal fatigue at 26 months of follow-up among 515 reported Q fever patients (647). Van Loenhout et al. performed a cohort study over a 24-month follow-up, using NCSI and SF-36 scores (648) among reported Q fever patients. They found rates of severe fatigue of 73% at 3 months, and this proportion decreased to 37% at 24 months but was still significantly higher than that in a healthy control group (2.5%). Baseline characteristics that were associated with long-term impaired health status were young women and preexisting health problems. In 2015, Keijmel et al. compared the characteristics of QFS patients and patients with CFS of other etiologies (649). QFS patients were significantly older, had a higher body mass index (BMI), and were more frequently men than patients with CFS. They also had received treatment for depression less often before the onset of symptoms. However, the two preceding studies suffer from a bias, which is the inclusion only of patients “reported” as having acute Q fever following the European guidelines (407), i.e., only patients with symptomatic primary infection. This bias was highlighted by Van Loenhout et al., who showed that long-term health status was altered at comparable levels for 193 reported and 448 nonreported cases at 4 years of follow-up (407).
MANAGEMENT STRATEGY FOR PATIENTS WITH C. BURNETII INFECTION
Given the clinical polymorphism of C. burnetii infection, there is no single management strategy. Recent studies have revealed that each situation requires specific treatment and follow-up. Regarding primary infection, the main issues after diagnosis are screening for potential risk factors for complications and choice of a prophylactic treatment with doxycycline (200 mg/day) and hydroxychloroquine (600 mg/day) to prevent progression to persistent focalized infection. Regarding endocarditis and vascular infections, early diagnosis should help to promptly initiate appropriate antibiotic therapy and rapidly decide if surgical treatment is needed. The special situation represented by pregnant women and children requires specific therapeutic options. In the case of other related complications such as chronic fatigue syndrome, no definite strategy is recommended to date, but cognitive behavioral therapy and doxycycline are under evaluation in a randomized controlled study in the Netherlands (650).
Treatment, Screening Strategy, and Follow-Up of Primary Infection
Treatment.
When primary infection is symptomatic, it is recommended to initiate antibiotic treatment using doxycycline (200 mg per day). The first comparative nonrandomized study was performed in 1962 (651). Powell et al. compared two regimens of treatment and showed that duration of fever was shorter (1.7 days) in patients treated with doxycycline than in untreated patients (3.3 days) (651) This treatment seemed to be more effective when initiated within the first 3 days of symptoms. Sobradillo et al. also observed that doxycycline treatment was associated with a more rapid decrease of fever (652). A recent retrospective study performed by Dijkstra et al. during the outbreak in the Netherlands confirmed that treatment with doxycycline, a fluoroquinolone, clarithromycin, or co-trimoxazole was associated with a reduced risk of hospitalization (653) compared with that for patients receiving beta-lactams or azithromycin. The same study found that a delay in treatment initiation of more than 7 days was associated with a higher rate of hospitalization. Side effects of doxycycline such as photosensitivity can be prevented by solar protection, and women should be on effective contraception for the duration of treatment. The standard duration of treatment is 14 days (654).
In case of doxycycline intolerance, minocycline, clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily), fluoroquinolones (ofloxacin 200 mg three times a day or pefloxacin 400 mg twice a day), and co-trimoxazole (160 mg trimethoprim and 800 mg sulfamethoxazole twice daily) are alternatives (17, 18). Azithromycin should not be a first choice, since in vitro studies have shown an elevated MIC (>8 mg/liter) and because of a higher risk of hospitalization with this treatment in the study from the Netherlands (21, 25, 653). For patients with neurological involvement during primary infection, fluoroquinolones are an interesting choice, since they have a good penetration in the cerebrospinal fluid (31). Glucocorticoids have been added to doxycycline in anecdotal reports, but we do not recommend using this treatment, since it can favor progression to persistent infection (292).
One study by Kampschreur et al. suggested that treatment of primary infection with doxycycline may prevent progression to persistent focalized infection (655). However, a significant bias of this result is that patients who have been treated for primary infection may have benefited from screening for risk factors and from closer follow-up than patients without treatment, who may have been actually undiagnosed during primary infection. To date, in the case of asymptomatic patients or when the diagnosis is made after resolution of symptoms, no treatment is recommended, except in the case of pregnancy (42).
Screening for risk factors of persistent focalized infection.
After treatment of C. burnetii primary infection, the duration of treatment and follow-up are determined according to the results of the screening for risk factors of persistent infection. If these risk factors are detected, antibiotic prophylaxis with doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine should be initiated. This combination has proven to be effective in preventing endocarditis in a cohort study from our center (320). Since hydroxychloroquine may induce ocular side effects, ophthalmological examination before treatment and every 6 months during follow-up is recommended. Also, this drug is contraindicated in patients with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) deficiency (654). When prophylaxis is initiated, we recommend serological follow-up 1 month after initiation of treatment and then every 3 months (422).
(i) Risk factors for endocarditis.
As discussed in the preceding section, age and the presence of a valvulopathy are the most important risk factors for progression to C. burnetii endocarditis. Thus, we recommend performing systematic transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in patients with primary infection. Antibiotic prophylaxis must be initiated in case of cardiac valve prosthesis, grade ≥2 valve stenosis or regurgitation, mitral valve prolapse, aortic bicuspidy, or remodeling or thickening of the valve (295) (Fig. 5).
Million et al. also demonstrated in a cohort study that high levels of IgG aCL were significantly more frequent in patients with valvulopathy (295). Therefore, in C. burnetii primary infection, IgG aCL may be a biomarker of valvulopathy, as it was highly elevated in patients for whom valvulopathy was diagnosed after two TTEs. Moreover, they also observed that greatly elevated IgG aCL during primary infection was an independent predictor of progression to endocarditis. For this reason, we recommend including an assay of IgG aCL in the systematic screening of patients with C. burnetii primary infection. Age greater than 40 and IgM II levels of >3,200 were also associated with progression to endocarditis. Consequently, in patients >40 years with an IgG aCL level of >75 IU and a normal TTE, we recommend performing transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to rule out any valvulopathy (295) (Fig. 5). If the TEE is negative, we recommend close serological and clinical follow-up for 2 years. Conversely, if the TTE is negative in a patient with a low IgG aCL level, we recommend routine serological and clinical follow-up at 6 months. Finally, high IgG aCL levels have been reported in patients presenting with thrombosis during C. burnetii primary infection (532, 533; Million et al., submitted). Consequently, we suggest screening patients for thrombosis in cases of high IgG aCL, in particular for thrombophlebitis of the leg and pulmonary embolism. (Fig. 5). In this context, in addition to doxycycline, patients with high IgG aCL levels (≥75 GPLU) may benefit from hydroxychloroquine treatment until the IgG aCL decreases to under this value (Million et al., submitted). Patients with thrombosis history, procoagulable state, or exceptionally high IgG aCL levels require prophylactic anticoagulation.
(ii) Risk factors for vascular infections.
C. burnetii vascular infections are very severe, and no prophylactic strategy existed until recently. Major risk factors are vascular grafts and the presence of preexisting vascular aneurysms. The most frequent localization is the abdominal aorta (418). In a recent study, we proposed a screening strategy to detect patients with undiscovered abdominal aortic aneurysm (418). Since age of >65, tobacco use, and familial history of aneurysm are the main risk factors for vascular aneurysms, we recommend performing an abdominal CT scan or ultrasound (in case of renal contraindication) in these patients. If a vascular aneurysm is detected, we recommend performing 18 F-FDG PET/CT to screen for signs of early infection. In case of a negative 18 F-FDG PET/CT, initiation of doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine should be done for prophylaxis (Fig. 5).
(iii) Immunocompromised hosts.
For immunocompromised patients, no data are available in the literature in favor of prophylaxis. However, we recommend close serological monitoring of these patients at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after primary infection, because they may be at higher risk for developing focalized persistent infection (654).
(iv) Follow-up strategy when no risk factor is detected during primary infection.
When all screening tests are negative, routine serological and clinical follow-up should be performed at 6 months (654). If serological titers persist at levels higher than 800 at 6 months of follow-up and if the patient shows signs of a poor clinical outcome, (persistent fever, asthenia, weight loss, or persistent superficial adenopathy), an 18 F-FDG PET/CT scan should be performed. In a recent study, we showed that this exam discovered an unsuspected focus of C. burnetii infection in 38.7% of patients with persistent IgG I titers of >800 (412).
Treatment and Follow-Up of Persistent Focalized Infection
Treatment and follow-up of endocarditis.
Antibiotic treatment for C. burnetii endocarditis combines doxycycline (200 mg/day) with hydroxychloroquine (200 mg 3 times/day). Hydroxychloroquine is necessary to raise the pH in the pseudolysosomal vacuole to restore doxycycline activity (36, 656). This combination has shown bactericidal activity in vitro (36). In 2010, Million et al. reported the results of a survey of 104 patients with C. burnetii endocarditis followed in our center (415). The main side effects reported were photosensitization in 23% of patients, digestive intolerance in 7%, ocular toxicity in 4%, and irreversible skin pigmentation in 3% (415). In that study, the rate of endocarditis-related mortality was 4% after 3 years of follow-up. Independent factors associated with death were age at diagnosis, stroke at diagnosis, prosthetic valve, and absence of a 4-fold decrease in IgG and IgA at 1 year of follow-up. The ideal time for serological cure (IgG1 level of <800) was 41 months, and 36% of patients had serological cure at 3 years. Independent factors associated with serological failure were male sex, the presence of IgG1 at diagnosis, and delay in treatment initiation. Forty-five percent of patients had surgical treatment, which was more frequently performed in cases of heart failure and cardiac abscess. However, surgery was not associated with a better survival, except in the group of patients with a valvular prosthesis. Clinical and serological cure is possible without valve replacement. Analyses of the excised valves (by culture and IHC) were all negative after 24 months of treatment. However, two prosthetic valves were positive after 18 months. In addition, serological relapse was associated with treatment of less than 18 months and prosthetic valve endocarditis. For these reasons, we recommend treating patients with native valve endocarditis for 18 months and patients with prosthetic valve endocarditis for 24 months. Longer treatment can be proposed in the case of absence of a 4-fold decrease in IgG and IgA and no disappearance of IgM II. Serological monitoring should be performed every 3 months during treatment. Rolain et al. have shown that serum doxycycline concentrations up to 5 μg/ml are correlated with good serological progression in patients with endocarditis (657). Thus, monitoring of doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine concentrations, with objectives of >5 μg/ml and 1 ± 0.2 g/ml, respectively, is useful. We observed 6% of patients with serological relapse at 5 years (415). For this reason, we recommend continuing serological monitoring until 5 years of follow-up.
Treatment and follow-up of vascular infections.
For years no consensual guidelines were available concerning vascular infections, due to a too-small number of cases per center. However, a retrospective study of 32 patients by Botelho-Nevers et al. in 2007 suggested that surgical resection of the infected tissues was associated with recovery (417). Twenty-five percent of patients from this cohort had died at 3 years follow-up, and patients who died had a significantly shorter course of treatment (mean duration of treatment, 10 months), less frequent surgical treatment, and more frequent vascular rupture. Therefore, doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine treatment should last for a minimum of 24 months.
More recently, we performed a retrospective study of all patients with infections of vascular aneurysms or grafts who have been followed in our center between 1986 and 2015 (418). For 66 patients, a follow-up of 2.5 years was available, and the mortality rate was 18.5%. Mortality rates were significantly different for patients who were operated on and those who were not (6.5% versus 28.6%, respectively; P = 0.02), and surgical treatment was the only independent factor associated with survival (418). Surgical treatment was also a predictor of good serological progression. For three patients, qPCR on a vascular biopsy specimen was positive after 2 years of treatment, and for one patient, culture was also positive at that time. This illustrates that antibiotic treatment alone is not sufficient to eradicate the infection in this setting and that resection of the infected tissue is mandatory, due to the high bacterial load.
In our study, patients with vascular graft infection were less frequently operated on than patients with vascular aneurysm infections, and in this subgroup of patients, surgery was associated with good serological progression, but correlation with survival was not statistically significant. This lack of correlation may be due either to a lack of statistical power or to the fact that postoperative mortality was higher in the group of patients with vascular grafts. In fact, these patients may have more cardiovascular comorbidities and higher anesthesia risks than patients with infection of vascular aneurysms.
The conclusion from this study is that surgical treatment should be performed in the case of C. burnetii infection of a vascular aneurysm. In the case of patients with vascular grafts, surgery should be performed after careful assessment of surgical and anesthesia risks. Semiconservative surgery, which was successful in a case report from Kloppenburg et al., may be a solution in patients presenting a very high surgical risk (658).
Serological monitoring should follow the same pattern as for endocarditis.
Treatment and follow-up of other persistent focalized infections.
For other types of persistent focalized infections, such as osteoarticular infections and persistent lymphadenitis, no cohort study is available, so that treatment options rely on case reports and expert advice.
Regarding osteoarticular infection, administration of doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine for 18 months has been reported to be the best option (419, 420). However, one case of treatment failure was reported in a patient with prosthetic joint arthritis, but this patient had rheumatoid arthritis and was on immunosuppressive treatment. In this case, surgical removal of the prosthesis was necessary for cure. To date, no treatment recommendation exists for persistent lymphadenitis. We propose the same 18-month duration of antibiotic treatment when this diagnosis is definite according to our recent criteria. The same serological monitoring as for endocarditis and vascular infections should be performed in such patients.
Treatment and Follow-Up of Pregnant Women and Children
Pregnant women.
A retrospective cohort study compared obstetrical outcomes in 16 pregnant women who received long-term co-trimoxazole (i.e., 160/800 twice daily for 5 weeks) versus 37 who did not receive this treatment. Obstetrical complications were observed in 81.1% of pregnant women without treatment versus 43.9% of pregnant women who received long-term co-trimoxazole (P = 0.009) (659). In particular, no intrauterine fetal deaths were observed in the latter case. Moreover, this treatment reduced the rate of placentitis and progression to a chronic serological profile. Angelakis et al. have confirmed this result, with 42% of treated pregnant women presenting obstetrical complications versus 100% of untreated pregnant women (164). Finally, a meta-analysis by Million et al. on this subject included 136 pregnancies (4 case histories and 7 population-based studies). This study revealed an increased risk of fetal death when C. burnetii serology was positive, but this risk was significantly reduced when pregnant women were treated (148). Because co-trimoxazole is a folic acid antagonist, supplementation with folic acid should be administered during the first trimester of pregnancy. After treatment, close serological follow-up should be performed at 3, 5, 9, 12, 18, and 24 months for early detection of progression to persistent focalized infection.
When persistent focalized infection is diagnosed during pregnancy, co-trimoxazole should be initiated and maintained until delivery. After delivery, a change to doxycycline and hydroxychloroquine should be made. In case of diagnosis in the peripartum period, breastfeeding is not recommended, due to possible transmission to the newborn (659).
Children.
Doxycycline is used in the treatment of primary infection for children >8 years old (310, 609, 612). The pediatric dose for doxycycline is 2.2 mg/kg twice daily (42). The duration of treatment is 14 days, as for adults. For children with mild primary infection who are younger than 8 years old, we recommend using co-trimoxazole because of the risk of dental staining. However, a recent review by Cross et al. concerning the risks and benefits of doxycycline suggests that, conversely to the case for tetracycline, no strong evidence of correlation with dental staining and teratogenic effects can be found in the literature (660). Therefore, in children <8 years old with severe primary infection, we recommend using doxycycline.
Regarding the treatment of persistent focalized infection in children, few data are available in the literature. Cases of endocarditis and infection of a bovine jugular vein conduit were treated with doxycycline plus hydroxychloroquine and surgery (187, 616). These cases involved children 11 and 13 years old. Osteomyelitis is treated with variable combinations of the following antibiotics: co-trimoxazole, ciprofloxacin, rifampin, doxycycline, clarithromycin, and azithromycin (578, 581, 582). The most frequent duration of treatment found in the literature is 6 months, and surgical drainage of multifocal osteomyelitis is often needed for cure (578). One reference laboratory described successful surgical treatment alone in a child with a single bone lesion (579). An anecdotal case of treatment with gamma interferon as salvage therapy in a 3-year-old child is reported, but it does not seem reasonable to recommend this treatment (661).
Treatment of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome
Regarding the treatment of QFS, a prospective randomized trial is currently in progress in the Netherlands to compare the efficacy of doxycycline and cognitive behavioral therapy versus placebo (650). Inclusion criteria for this study are based on the definition of Q fever fatigue syndrome (QFS) from the Dutch National Consensus. Cognitive behavioral therapies have proven to be effective in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome following other diseases and may therefore be an interesting option.
Prevention
In some situations, Q fever is an occupational disease. This has been illustrated by the first description of the disease, which occurred in a population of slaughterhouse workers. Also, a member of a laboratory team cultivating C. burnetii in the 1930s was infected (375). The main categories of people occupationally exposed are those working with animals (farmers, slaughterhouse workers, and veterinarians) and people working in laboratories cultivating the bacterium. Cases involving medical staff consist of people who participated in autopsies of patients with Q fever (662, 663) or an obstetrician who managed parturient women with Q fever (130). Cases in the military have also been reported (1, 664, 665). In this section we detail the available prophylactic measures in occupational settings.
Vaccination.
A vaccine has been available in Australia since 1989 (Q-Vax; CSL Biotherapies, Parkville, Victoria, Australia) (666). It is a whole-cell formalin-inactivated vaccine produced and licensed in Australia. Its efficacy has been tested in one randomized control study among 200 slaughterhouse workers. During 15 months of follow-up, there were seven cases in the control group and no cases in the vaccinated group (667). However, this vaccine can induce local reactions, and patients should be evaluated with a cutaneous test (Q-Vax skin test) for Q fever before vaccination to avoid severe side effects. The Australian Veterinary Association (AVA) recommends vaccination for all veterinarians, veterinary students, and veterinary nurses. A recent survey in that country has shown that 74% of veterinarians and 29% of veterinary nurses sought vaccination (666). Also, a nationally funded vaccination program was initiated in the country in 2002 (668). Program adherence was 100% among slaughterhouse workers and 43% in farmers. After this campaign, reporting for Q fever decreased by 50%, and the number of hospitalizations also decreased (668). In 2011, in the southeast of the Netherlands, a vaccination campaign targeted people at risk for progression to endocarditis and vascular infections during the epidemic (669). However, coverage rates in high-risk people of only 11% to 18% were observed, illustrating poor efficacy from a public health perspective. No other country has tried to institute a large-scale vaccination program among occupationally exposed persons to date. In these areas, the improvement of clinicians' awareness about the risk for C. burnetii infection in some categories of workers should help in the early diagnosis and treatment of the infection.
Isolation.
Regarding the prevention of transmission in laboratory workers handling C. burnetii cultures, all manipulations have to be made in a biosafety level 3 (BSL3) laboratory with appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE). For health care personnel performing autopsies on patients suspected to have died from Q fever, wearing of an N95 respiratory protection mask is recommended. The same recommendation can be made for obstetrical staff who are in contact with parturient women diagnosed with C. burnetii infection.
Moreover, because C. burnetii can survive in the environment in a spore-like form, contaminated surfaces should be cleaned with a solution containing a dual quaternary ammonium-detergent compound, which completely inactivates the bacteria after a 30-min contact time (42). A 1:100 dilution of household bleach is also an effective solution.
PERSPECTIVES AND FUTURE CHALLENGES
A more accurate assessment of the risk factors in the progression to C. burnetii endocarditis will require particular studies. The understanding of individual susceptibility factors will allow better management through active treatment in order to prevent progression to this still-severe disease. The systematic detection of C. burnetii by multiplex PCR strategies in syndromes such as endocarditis, pneumonia, hepatitis, and fever during pregnancy should allow diagnosis and treatment of more cases in the world. Finally, new therapeutic strategies with shorter courses and better tolerance should be developed for endocarditis and vascular infections. In vitro testing, new antibiotic combinations, and randomized studies comparing new protocols to the therapeutic approach that has been used for the last 20 years are necessary and will be a major subject of future research.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We declare no conflict of interest.
Biographies
Carole Eldin, M.D., specializes in infectious diseases. Her clinical medical activity occurs at the University Hospital Institute Mediterrannee Infection of Marseilles. In 2014 she started a Ph.D. in microbiology, supervised by Professor Didier Raoult. Her research domain focuses on C. burnetii, its culture, and clinical aspects.
Cléa Mélenotte is a resident specialist in infectious diseases at the University Hospital of Marseille. Since 2014, she has been a Young Research Investigator within the Research Unit in Infectious and Tropical Emergent Diseases (URMITE) directed by Professor Didier Raoult. Her M.Sc. was supervised by Professor Didier Raoult and Professor Jean-Louis Mege and focuses on C. burnetii infection and its pathophysiology. She works on animal models.
Oleg Mediannikov, M.D., Ph.D., is a researcher specializing in infectious diseases. He graduated from the Medical University in Khabarovsk, Russia, in 1998 and obtained his Ph.D. in 2004. Since 2008 he has worked as a researcher for the Institute of Research for Development (IRD) in Didier Raoult's URMITE laboratory in Marseille, France. He focuses on vector-borne and zoonotic diseases, including Q fever, anaplasmosis, spotted fevers, and borrelioses, and their vectors. Beginning in 2011, he spent 4 years in expatriation in Senegal. He now continues his studies of the origins of acute febrile diseases in West Africa, particularly emerging vector-borne diseases (including relapsing fever, spotted fevers, bartonelloses, filarioses, and malaria). He is an expert on the isolation of fastidious bacteria, particularly intracellular ones.
Eric Ghigo, CNRS Research Director at URMITE CNRS UMR7278, obtained his Ph.D. at the Aix-Marseille University, working on the bacterial mechanisms modifying the immune response and phagosome maturation and that allow bacterial survival in macrophages. He then moved to the Max Planck Institute of Molecular Cell Biology and Genetics (Dresden, Germany), where he investigated the molecular and cellular bases of vesicular trafficking. He focused particularly on the exchange mechanism from Rab5 to Rab7 endosomes. Since then, his work has been focused on elucidation of the mechanisms used by macrophages to fight microbes, with special attention to vesicular trafficking. Because of the diversity of the mechanisms involved in bacterial destruction (evolutionarily conserved or not), he developed a new model organism (planarians) to study the host-microbe interaction. This new model is contributing to the unveiling of new concepts and new mechanisms of the immune response and of bacterial destruction.
Matthieu Million, M.D., Ph.D., is an infectious disease specialist expert on Coxiella burnetii infections at Aix-Marseille University, France. He obtained the title of Doctor of Medicine in 2009. Subsequently, he obtained his Ph.D. at the Faculty of Medicine of Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, France, under the direction of Didier Raoult in 2013. He is currently responsible for diagnostic and therapeutic advice on Q fever at the French national referral center for Q fever, assisting Professor Raoult. He continues his research activity with the team of Didier Raoult. His research interests focus on the clinical manifestations and diagnostic and therapeutic options for Q fever and the critical role of the anarchic lymphocytic activation in Q fever complications, including antiphospholipid antibodies and lymphoma. By July 2016, Dr. Million had coauthored more than 80 publications in the international literature.
Sophie Edouard, Pharm.D., Ph.D., is microbiologist specializing in the diagnosis of infectious diseases, notably infections caused by intracellular bacteria, at Aix-Marseille University, France. She obtained the title of Doctor of Pharmacy in 2011. Subsequently, she obtained her Ph.D. at the Faculty of Medicine of Marseille, Aix-Marseille University, France, under the direction of Didier Raoult in 2013. She is now in charge of diagnosing and managing infection with fastidious bacteria at the infectious diseases department of the University Hospital of Marseille and in the French reference center for the diagnosis of rickettsioses, bartonelloses, and Q fever. She continues her research activity with the team of Didier Raoult. Her research interests focus on the diagnosis of and culture techniques for fastidious and vector-borne bacteria, including C. burnetii, Bartonella spp., and Rickettsia spp. By July 2016, Dr. Edouard had coauthored more than 50 publications in the international literature.
Jean-Louis Mege obtained his M.D. in 1984, his Ph.D. in 1990, and a position as professor in immunology at Aix Marseille University, France, in 1994. He is director of the master program in human pathology, codirector of the “Science of Life and Health” doctoral school (ED62), president of the Scientific Council of Medicine Faculty (Marseilles), and group leader of the team “Infections, Gender and Pregnancy” at IHU (“Méditerranée Infection”). He studies the mechanisms of bacterial survival in macrophages, the polarization of monocytes and macrophages, and the immunological investigation of infected patients and has coauthored 206 scientific publications.
Max Maurin, M.D., Ph.D., is 54 years old and trained in Professor Didier Raoult's team from 1991 to 2002. He received his M.D. degree at the Medical Faculty of Marseille, Aix-Marseille II University, France, in 1991 and his Ph.D. degree at the Bichat Faculty, Paris VII University, France, in 1993. He was appointed as a professor of bacteriology at Grenoble University Hospital (Grenoble Alpes University) in 2002. He has been the head of this bacteriology laboratory since 2002 and of the French national reference Center for Francisella since 2006. Since 1991, he has been involved in the study of strict and facultative intracellular bacteria that are pathogenic for humans and animals. His main research topic has been focused on the characterization interactions between intracellular bacteria and antibiotics.
Didier Raoult, M.D., Ph.D., specializes in infectious diseases and is a professor of microbiology at the Faculty of Medicine of Marseille, Aix Marseille University. In 1984, he created ex nihilo his research laboratory, the Rickettsia Unit. This unit has now become the Research Unit in Infectious and Tropical Emergent Diseases (URMITE), collaborating with the CNRS (National Center for the Scientific Research), the IRD (Institute of Research for Development), and INSERM (National Institute of Health and Medical Research). In 2011, he became the director of the University Hospital Institute Mediterranée Infection, which is a 600-person medical institute focused on infectious diseases. This facility includes the largest diagnostic and research microbiology laboratory in France. As of 2014, Professor Raoult has published more than 1,900 indexed publications. In the last 30 years, he has cultured approximately 16% of the bacteria isolated for the first time in humans, including Tropheryma whipplei, in his laboratory, and he developed a culturomics team in 2011.
REFERENCES
- 1.White B, Brooks T, Seaton RA. 2013. Q fever in military and paramilitary personnel in conflict zones: case report and review. Travel Med Infect Dis 11:134–137. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2012.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Angelakis E, Mediannikov O, Socolovschi C, Mouffok N, Bassene H, Tall A, Niangaly H, Doumbo O, Znazen A, Sarih M, Sokhna C, Raoult D. 2014. Coxiella burnetii-positive PCR in febrile patients in rural and urban Africa. Int J Infect Dis 28:107–110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.05.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eldin C, Mahamat A, Demar M, Abboud P, Djossou F, Raoult D. 2014. Q fever in French Guiana. Am J Trop Med Hyg 91:771–776. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Delsing CE, Kullberg BJ, Bleeker-Rovers CP. 2010. Q fever in the Netherlands from 2007 to 2010. Neth J Med 68:382–387. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Million M, Raoult D. 2015. Recent advances in the study of Q fever epidemiology, diagnosis and management. J Infect 71(Suppl 1):S2–S9. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2015.04.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gimenez DF. 1964. Staining rickettsiae in yolk-sac cultures. Stain Technol 39:135–140. doi: 10.3109/10520296409061219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Angelakis E, Raoult D. 2010. Q fever. Vet Microbiol 140:297–309. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2009.07.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Voth DE, Heinzen RA. 2007. Lounging in a lysosome: the intracellular lifestyle of Coxiella burnetii. Cell Microbiol 9:829–840. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00901.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Seshadri R, Paulsen IT, Eisen JA, Read TD, Nelson KE, Nelson WC, Ward NL, Tettelin H, Davidsen TM, Beanan MJ, Deboy RT, Daugherty SC, Brinkac LM, Madupu R, Dodson RJ, Khouri HM, Lee KH, Carty HA, Scanlan D, Heinzen RA, Thompson HA, Samuel JE, Fraser CM, Heidelberg JF. 2003. Complete genome sequence of the Q-fever pathogen Coxiella burnetii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:5455–5460. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0931379100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sandoz KM, Popham DL, Beare PA, Sturdevant DE, Hansen B, Nair V, Heinzen RA. 2016. Transcriptional profiling of Coxiella burnetii reveals extensive cell wall remodeling in the small cell variant developmental form. PLoS One 11:e0149957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sandoz KM, Sturdevant DE, Hansen B, Heinzen RA. 2014. Developmental transitions of Coxiella burnetii grown in axenic media. J Microbiol Methods 96:104–110. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2013.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Enright JB, Sadler WW, Thomas RC. 1957. Pasteurization of milk containing the organism of Q fever. Am J Public Health Nations Health 47:695–700. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.47.6.695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Huebner RJ, Hottle GA, Robinson EB. 1948. Action of streptomycin in experimental infection with Q fever. Public Health Rep 63:357–362. doi: 10.2307/4586483. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Jackson EB. 1951. Comparative efficacy of several antibiotics on experimental rickettsial infections in embryonated eggs. Antibiot Chemother 1:231–241. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yeaman MR, Mitscher LA, Baca OG. 1987. In vitro susceptibility of Coxiella burnetii to antibiotics, including several quinolones. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 31:1079–1084. doi: 10.1128/AAC.31.7.1079. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Raoult D, Torres H, Drancourt M. 1991. Shell-vial assay: evaluation of a new technique for determining antibiotic susceptibility, tested in 13 isolates of Coxiella burnetii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 35:2070–2077. doi: 10.1128/AAC.35.10.2070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gikas A, Spyridaki I, Psaroulaki A, Kofterithis D, Tselentis Y. 1998. In vitro susceptibility of Coxiella burnetii to trovafloxacin in comparison with susceptibilities to pefloxacin, ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin, doxycycline, and clarithromycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:2747–2748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gikas A, Spyridaki I, Scoulica E, Psaroulaki A, Tselentis Y. 2001. In vitro susceptibility of Coxiella burnetii to linezolid in comparison with its susceptibilities to quinolones, doxycycline, and clarithromycin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:3276–3278. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.11.3276-3278.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Brennan RE, Samuel JE. 2003. Evaluation of Coxiella burnetii antibiotic susceptibilities by real-time PCR assay. J Clin Microbiol 41:1869–1874. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.5.1869-1874.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Boulos A, Rolain J-M, Maurin M, Raoult D. 2004. Measurement of the antibiotic susceptibility of Coxiella burnetii using real time PCR. Int J Antimicrob Agents 23:169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2003.07.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lever MS, Bewley KR, Dowsett B, Lloyd G. 2004. In vitro susceptibility of Coxiella burnetii to azithromycin, doxycycline, ciprofloxacin and a range of newer fluoroquinolones. Int J Antimicrob Agents 24:194–196. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2004.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Andoh M, Naganawa T, Yamaguchi T, Fukushi H, Hirai K. 2004. In vitro susceptibility to tetracycline and fluoroquinolones of Japanese isolates of Coxiella burnetii. Microbiol Immunol 48:661–664. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2004.tb03476.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Spyridaki I, Psaroulaki A, Vranakis I, Tselentis Y, Gikas A. 2009. Bacteriostatic and bactericidal activities of tigecycline against Coxiella burnetii and comparison with those of six other antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:2690–2692. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01424-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Unsworth NB, Dawson RM, Wade JD, Liu C-Q. 2014. Susceptibility of intracellular Coxiella burnetii to antimicrobial peptides in mouse fibroblast cells. Protein Pept Lett 21:115–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Eldin C, Perreal C, Mahamat A, Djossou F, Edouard S, Raoult D. 2015. Antibiotic susceptibility determination for six strains of Coxiella burnetii MST 17 from Cayenne, French Guiana. Int J Antimicrob Agents 46:600–602. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rolain J-M, Boulos A, Mallet M-N, Raoult D. 2005. Correlation between ratio of serum doxycycline concentration to MIC and rapid decline of antibody levels during treatment of Q fever endocarditis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:2673–2676. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.7.2673-2676.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rouli L, Rolain J-M, El Filali A, Robert C, Raoult D. 2012. Genome sequence of Coxiella burnetii 109, a doxycycline-resistant clinical isolate. J Bacteriol 194:6939. doi: 10.1128/JB.01856-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Rolain J-M, Lambert F, Raoult D. 2005. Activity of telithromycin against thirteen new isolates of C. burnetii including three resistant to doxycycline. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1063:252–256. doi: 10.1196/annals.1355.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jabarit-Aldighieri N, Torres H, Raoult D. 1992. Susceptibility of Rickettsia conorii, R. rickettsii, and Coxiella burnetii to PD 127,391, PD 131,628, pefloxacin, ofloxacin, and ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 36:2529–2532. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Raoult D. 1993. Treatment of Q fever. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 37:1733–1736. doi: 10.1128/AAC.37.9.1733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Drancourt M, Gallais H, Raoult D, Estrangin E, Mallet MN, De Micco P. 1988. Ofloxacin penetration into cerebrospinal fluid. J Antimicrob Chemother 22:263–265. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.2.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Spyridaki I, Psaroulaki A, Aransay A, Scoulica E, Tselentis Y. 2000. Diagnosis of quinolone-resistant Coxiella burnetii strains by PCR-RFLP. J Clin Lab Anal 14:59–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Musso D, Drancourt M, Osscini S, Raoult D. 1996. Sequence of quinolone resistance-determining region of gyrA gene for clinical isolates and for an in vitro-selected quinolone-resistant strain of Coxiella burnetii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:870–873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Botelho-Nevers E, Singh S, Chiche L, Raoult D. 2013. Effect of omeprazole on vacuole size in Coxiella burnetii-infected cells. J Infect 66:288–289. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Maurin M, Benoliel AM, Bongrand P, Raoult D. 1992. Phagolysosomes of Coxiella burnetii-infected cell lines maintain an acidic pH during persistent infection. Infect Immun 60:5013–5016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Raoult D, Drancourt M, Vestris G. 1990. Bactericidal effect of doxycycline associated with lysosomotropic agents on Coxiella burnetii in P388D1 cells. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 34:1512–1514. doi: 10.1128/AAC.34.8.1512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Raoult D, Houpikian P, Tissot Dupont H, Riss JM, Arditi-Djiane J, Brouqui P. 1999. Treatment of Q fever endocarditis: comparison of 2 regimens containing doxycycline and ofloxacin or hydroxychloroquine. Arch Intern Med 159:167–173. doi: 10.1001/archinte.159.2.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Singh S, Kowalczewska M, Edouard S, Eldin C, Perreal C, Weber P, Azza S, Raoult D. 2013. Cell extract-containing medium for culture of intracellular fastidious bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 51:2599–2607. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00719-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Omsland A, Cockrell DC, Fischer ER, Heinzen RA. 2008. Sustained axenic metabolic activity by the obligate intracellular bacterium Coxiella burnetii. J Bacteriol 190:3203–3212. doi: 10.1128/JB.01911-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Omsland A, Cockrell DC, Howe D, Fischer ER, Virtaneva K, Sturdevant DE, Porcella SF, Heinzen RA. 2009. Host cell-free growth of the Q fever bacterium Coxiella burnetii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:4430–4434. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812074106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Omsland A, Beare PA, Hill J, Cockrell DC, Howe D, Hansen B, Samuel JE, Heinzen RA. 2011. Isolation from animal tissue and genetic transformation of Coxiella burnetii are facilitated by an improved axenic growth medium. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3720–3725. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02826-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Anderson A, Bijlmer H, Fournier P-E, Graves S, Hartzell J, Kersh GJ, Limonard G, Marrie TJ, Massung RF, McQuiston JH, Nicholson WL, Paddock CD, Sexton DJ. 2013. Diagnosis and management of Q fever—United States, 2013: recommendations from CDC and the Q Fever Working group. MMWR Recomm Rep 62:1–30. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Guatteo R, Beaudeau F, Berri M, Rodolakis A, Joly A, Seegers H. 2006. Shedding routes of Coxiella burnetii in dairy cows: implications for detection and control. Vet Res 37:827–833. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2006038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Rodolakis A, Berri M, Héchard C, Caudron C, Souriau A, Bodier CC, Blanchard B, Camuset P, Devillechaise P, Natorp JC, Vadet JP, Arricau-Bouvery N. 2007. Comparison of Coxiella burnetii shedding in milk of dairy bovine, caprine, and ovine herds. J Dairy Sci 90:5352–5360. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.McQuiston JH, Holman RC, McCall CL, Childs JE, Swerdlow DL, Thompson HA. 2006. National surveillance and the epidemiology of human Q fever in the United States, 1978-2004. Am J Trop Med Hyg 75:36–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tissot-Dupont H, Torres S, Nezri M, Raoult D. 1999. Hyperendemic focus of Q fever related to sheep and wind. Am J Epidemiol 150:67–74. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.D'amato F, Million M, Edouard S, Delerce J, Robert C, Marrie T, Raoult D. 2014. Draft genome sequence of Coxiella burnetii Dog Utad, a strain isolated from a dog-related outbreak of Q fever. New Microbes New Infect 2:136–137. doi: 10.1002/nmi2.55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Buhariwalla F, Cann B, Marrie TJ. 1996. A dog-related outbreak of Q fever. Clin Infect Dis 23:753–755. doi: 10.1093/clinids/23.4.753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Robyn MP, Newman AP, Amato M, Walawander M, Kothe C, Nerone JD, Pomerantz C, Behravesh CB, Biggs HM, Dahlgren FS, Pieracci EG, Whitfield Y, Sider D, Ozaldin O, Berger L, Buck PA, Downing M, Blog D. 2015. Q fever outbreak among travelers to Germany who received live cell therapy—United States and Canada, 2014. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 64:1071–1073. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6438a3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kaplan MM, Bertagna P. 1955. The geographical distribution of Q fever. Bull World Health Organ 13:829–860. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Dupont HT, Brouqui P, Faugere B, Raoult D. 1995. Prevalence of antibodies to Coxiella burnetii, Rickettsia conorii, and Rickettsia typhi in seven African countries. Clin Infect Dis 21:1126–1133. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.5.1126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Schelling E, Diguimbaye C, Daoud S, Nicolet J, Boerlin P, Tanner M, Zinsstag J. 2003. Brucellosis and Q-fever seroprevalences of nomadic pastoralists and their livestock in Chad. Prev Vet Med 61:279–293. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2003.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ghoneim N, Abdel-Moein K. 2012. Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii antibodies among farm animals and human contacts in Egypt. J Am Sci 8:619–621. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Noden BH, Tshavuka FI, van der Colf BE, Chipare I, Wilkinson R. 2014. Exposure and risk factors to coxiella burnetii, spotted fever group and typhus group Rickettsiae, and Bartonella henselae among volunteer blood donors in Namibia. PLoS One 9:e108674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lacheheb A, Raoult D. 2009. Seroprevalence of Q-fever in Algeria. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:167–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Mediannikov O, Fenollar F, Socolovschi C, Diatta G, Bassene H, Molez J-F, Sokhna C, Trape J-F, Raoult D. 2010. Coxiella burnetii in humans and ticks in rural Senegal. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4:e654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Prabhu M, Nicholson WL, Roche AJ, Kersh GJ, Fitzpatrick KA, Oliver LD, Massung RF, Morrissey AB, Bartlett JA, Onyango JJ, Maro VP, Kinabo GD, Saganda W, Crump JA. 2011. Q fever, spotted fever group, and typhus group rickettsioses among hospitalized febrile patients in northern Tanzania. Clin Infect Dis 53:e8–e15. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir411. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Crump JA, Morrissey AB, Nicholson WL, Massung RF, Stoddard RA, Galloway RL, Ooi EE, Maro VP, Saganda W, Kinabo GD, Muiruri C, Bartlett JA. 2013. Etiology of severe non-malaria febrile illness in Northern Tanzania: a prospective cohort study. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7:e2324. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Vanderburg S, Rubach MP, Halliday JEB, Cleaveland S, Reddy EA, Crump JA. 2014. Epidemiology of Coxiella burnetii infection in Africa: a OneHealth systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8:e2787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Koulla-Shiro S, Kuaban C, Bélec L. 1997. Microbial etiology of acute community-acquired pneumonia in adult hospitalized patients in Yaounde-Cameroon. Clin Microbiol Infect 3:180–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kamga-Waladjo AR, Gbati OB, Kone P, Lapo RA, Chatagnon G, Bakou SN, Pangui LJ, Diop PEH, Akakpo JA, Tainturier D. 2010. Seroprevalence of Neospora caninum antibodies and its consequences for reproductive parameters in dairy cows from Dakar-Senegal, West Africa. Trop Anim Health Prod 42:953–959. doi: 10.1007/s11250-009-9513-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Adesiyun AA, Jagun AG, Tekdek LB. 1984. Coxiella burnetii antibodies in some Nigerian dairy cows and their suckling calves. Int J Zoonoses 11:155–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gwida M, El-Ashker M, El-Diasty M, Engelhardt C, Khan I, Neubauer H. 2014. Q fever in cattle in some Egyptian Governorates: a preliminary study. BMC Res Notes 7:881. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Horton KC, Wasfy M, Samaha H, Abdel-Rahman B, Safwat S, Abdel Fadeel M, Mohareb E, Dueger E. 2014. Serosurvey for zoonotic viral and bacterial pathogens among slaughtered livestock in Egypt. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 14:633–639. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2013.1525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ratmanov P, Bassene H, Fenollar F, Tall A, Sokhna C, Raoult D, Mediannikov O. 2013. The correlation of Q fever and Coxiella burnetii DNA in household environments in rural Senegal. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 13:70–72. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2012.1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Sulyok KM, Hornok S, Abichu G, Erdélyi K, Gyuranecz M. 2014. Identification of novel Coxiella burnetii genotypes from Ethiopian ticks. PLoS One 9:e113213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Potasman I, Rzotkiewicz S, Pick N, Keysary A. 2000. Outbreak of Q fever following a safari trip. Clin Infect Dis 30:214–215. doi: 10.1086/313613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Schimmer B, Morroy G, Dijkstra F, Schneeberger PM, Weers-Pothoff G, Timen A, Wijkmans C, van der Hoek W. 2008. Large ongoing Q fever outbreak in the south of The Netherlands, 2008. Euro Surveill 13(31):pii=18939. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=18939. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Karagiannis I, Morroy G, Rietveld A, Horrevorts AM, Hamans M, Francken P, Schimmer B. 2007. Q fever outbreak in the Netherlands: a preliminary report. Euro Surveill 12(32):pii=3247. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=3247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Schimmer B, Notermans DW, Harms MG, Reimerink JHJ, Bakker J, Schneeberger P, Mollema L, Teunis P, van Pelt W, van Duynhoven Y. 2012. Low seroprevalence of Q fever in The Netherlands prior to a series of large outbreaks. Epidemiol Infect 140:27–35. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811000136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Roest HIJ, Tilburg JJHC, van der Hoek W, Vellema P, van Zijderveld FG, Klaassen CHW, Raoult D. 2011. The Q fever epidemic in The Netherlands: history, onset, response and reflection. Epidemiol Infect 139:1–12. doi: 10.1017/S0950268810002268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Dijkstra F, van der Hoek W, Wijers N, Schimmer B, Rietveld A, Wijkmans CJ, Vellema P, Schneeberger PM. 2012. The 2007-2010 Q fever epidemic in The Netherlands: characteristics of notified acute Q fever patients and the association with dairy goat farming. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 64:3–12. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2011.00876.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Roest HIJ, Ruuls RC, Tilburg JJHC, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Klaassen CHW, Vellema P, van den Brom R, Dercksen D, Wouda W, Spierenburg MAH, van der Spek AN, Buijs R, de Boer AG, Willemsen PTJ, van Zijderveld FG. 2011. Molecular epidemiology of Coxiella burnetii from ruminants in Q fever outbreak, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 17:668–675. doi: 10.3201/eid1704.101562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Hogerwerf L, van den Brom R, Roest HIJ, Bouma A, Vellema P, Pieterse M, Dercksen D, Nielen M. 2011. Reduction of Coxiella burnetii prevalence by vaccination of goats and sheep, The Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 17:379–386. doi: 10.3201/eid1703.101157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Schneeberger PM, Wintenberger C, van der Hoek W, Stahl JP. 2014. Q fever in the Netherlands—2007-2010: what we learned from the largest outbreak ever. Med Mal Infect 44:339–353. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2014.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Wielders CCH, van Loenhout JAF, Morroy G, Rietveld A, Notermans DW, Wever PC, Renders NHM, Leenders ACAP, van der Hoek W, Schneeberger PM. 2015. Long-term serological follow-up of acute Q-fever patients after a large epidemic. PLoS One 10:e0131848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Morroy G, van der Hoek W, Albers J, Coutinho RA, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Schneeberger PM. 2015. Population screening for chronic Q-fever seven years after a major outbreak. PLoS One 10:e0131777. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kampschreur LM, Delsing CE, Groenwold RHH, Wegdam-Blans MCA, Bleeker-Rovers CP, de Jager-Leclercq MGL, Hoepelman AIM, van Kasteren ME, Buijs J, Renders NHM, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Oosterheert JJ, Wever PC. 2014. Chronic Q fever in the Netherlands 5 years after the start of the Q fever epidemic: results from the Dutch chronic Q fever database. J Clin Microbiol 52:1637–1643. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03221-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.de Lange MMA, Hukkelhoven CWPM, Munster JM, Schneeberger PM, van der Hoek W. 2015. Nationwide registry-based ecological analysis of Q fever incidence and pregnancy outcome during an outbreak in the Netherlands. BMJ Open 5:e006821. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Epelboin L, Chesnais C, Boullé C, Drogoul A-S, Raoult D, Djossou F, Mahamat A. 2012. Q fever pneumonia in French Guiana: prevalence, risk factors, and prognostic score. Clin Infect Dis 55:67–74. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Floch H. 1957. Q fever in French Guiana. Publ Cayenne Fr Guiana Inst Pasteur Guyane Fr Inini 18:1–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Gardon J, Héraud JM, Laventure S, Ladam A, Capot P, Fouquet E, Favre J, Weber S, Hommel D, Hulin A, Couratte Y, Talarmin A. 2001. Suburban transmission of Q fever in French Guiana: evidence of a wild reservoir. J Infect Dis 184:278–284. doi: 10.1086/322034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Tran A, Gardon J, Weber S, Polidori L. 2002. Mapping disease incidence in suburban areas using remotely sensed data. Am J Epidemiol 156:662–668. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Davoust B, Marrié J-L, Pommier de Santi V, Berenger J, Edouard S, Raoult D. 2014. The three-toed sloth, a putative reservoir of Q fever, Cayenne, French Guiana. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1760–1761. doi: 10.3201/eid2010.140694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Eldin C, Mahamat A, Djossou F, Raoult D. 2015. Rainfall and sloth births in may, Q fever in July, Cayenne, French Guiana. Am J Trop Med Hyg 92:979–981. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Maurin M, Raoult D. 1999. Q fever. Clin Microbiol Rev 12:518–553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Tissot-Dupont H, Raoult D. 2008. Q fever. Infect Dis Clin North Am 22:505–514, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2008.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Parker NR, Barralet JH, Bell AM. 2006. Q fever. Lancet 367:679–688. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68266-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Stevenson S, Gowardman J, Tozer S, Woods M. 17 September 2015. Life-threatening Q fever infection following exposure to kangaroos and wallabies. BMJ Case Rep doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-210808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Van den Brom R, van Engelen E, Roest HIJ, van der Hoek W, Vellema P. 2015. Coxiella burnetii infections in sheep or goats: an opinionated review. Vet Microbiol 181:119–129. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Rodolakis A. 2009. Q Fever in dairy animals. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1166:90–93. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04511.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bauer AE, Olivas S, Cooper M, Hornstra H, Keim P, Pearson T, Johnson AJ. 2015. Estimated herd prevalence and sequence types of Coxiella burnetii in bulk tank milk samples from commercial dairies in Indiana. BMC Vet Res 11:186. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0517-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Berri M, Rousset E, Champion JL, Russo P, Rodolakis A. 2007. Goats may experience reproductive failures and shed Coxiella burnetii at two successive parturitions after a Q fever infection. Res Vet Sci 83:47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2006.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Astobiza I, Barandika JF, Juste RA, Hurtado A, García-Pérez AL. 2013. Evaluation of the efficacy of oxytetracycline treatment followed by vaccination against Q fever in a highly infected sheep flock. Vet J 196:81–85. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2012.07.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Arricau-Bouvery N, Souriau A, Bodier C, Dufour P, Rousset E, Rodolakis A. 2005. Effect of vaccination with phase I and phase II Coxiella burnetii vaccines in pregnant goats. Vaccine 23:4392–4402. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2005.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Guatteo R, Seegers H, Joly A, Beaudeau F. 2008. Prevention of Coxiella burnetii shedding in infected dairy herds using a phase I C. burnetii inactivated vaccine. Vaccine 26:4320–4328. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Porten K, Rissland J, Tigges A, Broll S, Hopp W, Lunemann M, van Treeck U, Kimmig P, Brockmann SO, Wagner-Wiening C, Hellenbrand W, Buchholz U. 2006. A super-spreading ewe infects hundreds with Q fever at a farmers' market in Germany. BMC Infect Dis 6:147. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-6-147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Armengaud A, Kessalis N, Desenclos J-C, Maillot E, Brousse P, Brouqui P, Tixier-Dupont H, Raoult D, Provensal P, Obadia Y. 1997. Urban outbreak of Q fever, Briancon, France, March to June 1996. Euro Surveill 2(2):pii=137. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Carrieri MP, Tissot-Dupont H, Rey D, Brousse P, Renard H, Obadia Y, Raoult D. 2002. Investigation of a slaughterhouse-related outbreak of Q fever in the French Alps. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 21:17–21. doi: 10.1007/s10096-001-0645-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Nusinovici S, Hoch T, Brahim ML, Joly A, Beaudeau F. 22 September 2015. The effect of wind on Coxiella burnetii transmission between cattle herds: a mechanistic approach. Transbound Emerg Dis doi: 10.1111/tbed.12423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Cox HR. 1938. A filter-passing infectious agent isolated from ticks. III. Description of organism and cultivation experiments. Public Health Rep 53:2270–2276. [Google Scholar]
- 102.Smith DJW, Derrick EH. 1940. Studies in the epidemiology of Q fever. 1. The isolation of six strains of Rickettsia burneti from the tick Haemaphysalis humerosa. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 18:1–8. [Google Scholar]
- 103.Babudieri B. 1959. Q fever: a zoonosis. Adv Vet Sci 5:81–182. [Google Scholar]
- 104.Balashov YS, Daiter AB. 1973. Bloodsucking arthropods and rickettsiae. Sci Leningr 251. [Google Scholar]
- 105.Smith DJW. 1940. Studies in the epidemiology of Q fever. 3. The transmission of Q fever by the tick Haemaphysalis humerosa. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 18:103–118. [Google Scholar]
- 106.Smith DJW. 1942. Studies in the epidemiology of Q fever. 11. Experimental infection of the ticks Haemaphysalis bispinosa and Ornithodorus sp with Rickeltsia burneti,. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 20:295–296. [Google Scholar]
- 107.von Weyer F. 1953. Die Beziehungen des Q-Fieber-Erregers (Rickettsia burneti) zu Arthropoden. Z Tropenmed 4:344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Tarasevich IV. 1957. Studies on experimental Q fever in Hyalomma plumbeum plumbeum Panz. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 28:45. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Blanc G, Ascione L, Bésiat P. 1959. Experimental rickettsiaemia in tortoises (Testudo mauritanica) by inoculation with R. burneti and infection of the tick Hyalomma aegyptium. Bull Soc Pathol Exot 52:564–567. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110.Davis GE. 1940. Rickettsia diaporica: its persistence in the tissues of Ornithodoros turicata. Public Health Rep 55:1862–1864. doi: 10.2307/4583472. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Derrick EH, Smith DJW, Brown HE. 1942. Studies in the epidemiology of Q fever. 9. The role of the cow in the transmission of human infection. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 20:105–110. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Eklund CM, Parker RR, Lackman DB, Ecklund CM, Lockman DB. 1947. A case of Q fever probably contracted by exposure to ticks in nature. Public Health Rep 62:1413–1416. doi: 10.2307/4586287. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Burgdorfer W. 1951. Ornithodorus moubata as a test for Q Fever in Switzerland. Acta Trop 8:44–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Marrie TJ. 1990. Q fever: the disease. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. [Google Scholar]
- 115.Ghigo E, Pretat L, Desnues B, Capo C, Raoult D, Mege J-L. 2009. Intracellular life of Coxiella burnetii in macrophages. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1166:55–66. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04515.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116.Greub G, Raoult D. 2004. Microorganisms resistant to free-living amoebae. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:413–433. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.2.413-433.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Fields BS, Benson RF, Besser RE. 2002. Legionella and Legionnaires' disease: 25 years of investigation. Clin Microbiol Rev 15:506–526. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.3.506-526.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118.La Scola B, Raoult D. 2001. Survival of Coxiella burnetii within free-living amoeba Acanthamoeba castellanii. Clin Microbiol Infect 7:75–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119.Amitai Z, Bromberg M, Bernstein M, Raveh D, Keysary A, David D, Pitlik S, Swerdlow D, Massung R, Rzotkiewicz S, Halutz O, Shohat T. 2010. A large Q fever outbreak in an urban school in central Israel. Clin Infect Dis 50:1433–1438. doi: 10.1086/652442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Raoult D. 2010. Q fever, free amoeba, and air conditioning. Clin Infect Dis 51:869–869. doi: 10.1086/656292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Anonymous. 1950. Experimental Q fever in man. Br Med J 1:1000. [Google Scholar]
- 122.Tissot-Dupont H, Amadei M-A, Nezri M, Raoult D. 2004. Wind in November, Q fever in December. Emerg Infect Dis 10:1264–1269. doi: 10.3201/eid1007.030724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Huebner RJ, Jellison WL. 1949. Q fever studies in Southern California; effects of pasteurization on survival of C. burneti in naturally infected milk. Public Health Rep 64:499–511. doi: 10.2307/4586926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124.Eldin C, Angelakis E, Renvoisé A, Raoult D. 2013. Coxiella burnetii DNA, but not viable bacteria, in dairy products in France. Am J Trop Med Hyg 88:765–769. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.12-0212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Hatchette TF, Hudson RC, Schlech WF, Campbell NA, Hatchette JE, Ratnam S, Raoult D, Donovan C, Marrie TJ. 2001. Goat-associated Q fever: a new disease in Newfoundland. Emerg Infect Dis 7:413–419. doi: 10.3201/eid0703.017308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Benson WW, Brock DW, Mather J. 1963. Serologic analysis of a penitentiary group using raw milk from a Q fever infected herd. Public Health Rep 78:707–710. doi: 10.2307/4591908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Krumbiegel ER, Wisniewski HJ. 1970. Q fever in the Milwaukee area. II. Consumption of infected raw milk by human volunteers. Arch Environ Health 21:63–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128.Mancini F, Di Luca M, Toma L, Vescio F, Bianchi R, Khoury C, Marini L, Rezza G, Ciervo A. 2014. Prevalence of tick-borne pathogens in an urban park in Rome, Italy. Ann Agric Environ Med 21:723–727. doi: 10.5604/12321966.1129922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Osorio S, Sarriá C, González-Ruano P, Casal EC, García A. 2003. Nosocomial transmission of Q fever. J Hosp Infect 54:162–163. doi: 10.1016/S0195-6701(03)00111-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Raoult D, Stein A. 1994. Q fever during pregnancy—a risk for women, fetuses, and obstetricians. N Engl J Med 330:371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Amit S, Shinar S, Halutz O, Atiya-Nasagi Y, Giladi M. 2014. Suspected person-to-person transmission of Q fever among hospitalized pregnant women. Clin Infect Dis 58:e146–147. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Kersh GJ, Priestley R, Massung RF. 2013. Stability of Coxiella burnetii in stored human blood. Transfusion (Paris) 53:1493–1496. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2012.03912.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Slot E, Hogema BM, Molier M, Zaaijer HL. 2014. Screening of blood donors for chronic Coxiella burnetii infection after large Q fever outbreaks. Transfusion (Paris) 54:2867–2870. doi: 10.1111/trf.12749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Oei W, Kretzschmar MEE, Zaaijer HL, Coutinho R, van der Poel CL, Janssen MP. 2014. Estimating the transfusion transmission risk of Q fever. Transfusion (Paris) 54:1705–1711. doi: 10.1111/trf.12539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Kanfer E, Farrag N, Price C, MacDonald D, Coleman J, Barrett AJ. 1988. Q fever following bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 3:165–166. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Milazzo A, Hall R, Storm PA, Harris RJ, Winslow W, Marmion BP. 2001. Sexually transmitted Q fever. Clin Infect Dis 33:399–402. doi: 10.1086/321878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Hawker JI, Ayres JG, Blair I, Evans MR, Smith DL, Smith EG, Burge PS, Carpenter MJ, Caul EO, Coupland B, Desselberger U, Farrell ID, Saunders PJ, Wood MJ. 1998. A large outbreak of Q fever in the West Midlands: windborne spread into a metropolitan area? Commun Dis Public Health 1:180–187. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 138.Hellenbrand W, Breuer T, Petersen L. 2001. Changing epidemiology of Q fever in Germany, 1947-1999. Emerg Infect Dis 7:789–796. doi: 10.3201/eid0705.010504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Harris P, Eales KM, Squires R, Govan B, Norton R. 2013. Acute Q fever in northern Queensland: variation in incidence related to rainfall and geographical location. Epidemiol Infect 141:1034–1038. doi: 10.1017/S0950268812001495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Cooper A, Barnes T, Potter A, Ketheesan N, Govan B. 2012. Determination of Coxiella burnetii seroprevalence in macropods in Australia. Vet Microbiol 155:317–323. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Mosavi LK, Cammett TJ, Desrosiers DC, Peng Z-Y. 2004. The ankyrin repeat as molecular architecture for protein recognition. Protein Sci 13:1435–1448. doi: 10.1110/ps.03554604. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Beare PA, Unsworth N, Andoh M, Voth DE, Omsland A, Gilk SD, Williams KP, Sobral BW, Kupko JJ, Porcella SF, Samuel JE, Heinzen RA. 2009. Comparative genomics reveal extensive transposon-mediated genomic plasticity and diversity among potential effector proteins within the genus Coxiella. Infect Immun 77:642–656. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01141-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.D'Amato F, Rouli L, Edouard S, Tyczka J, Million M, Robert C, Nguyen TT, Raoult D. 2014. The genome of Coxiella burnetii Z3055, a clone linked to the Netherlands Q fever outbreaks, provides evidence for the role of drift in the emergence of epidemic clones. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 37:281–288. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2014.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.D'Amato F, Eldin C, Georgiades K, Edouard S, Delerce J, Labas N, Raoult D. 2015. Loss of TSS1 in hypervirulent Coxiella burnetii 175, the causative agent of Q fever in French Guiana. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 41:35–41. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2015.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Sidi-Boumedine K, Ellis RJ, Adam G, Prigent M, Angen O, Aspán A, Thiéry R, Rousset E. 2014. Draft genome sequences of six ruminant Coxiella burnetii isolates of European origin. Genome Announc; 2:pii: e00285–14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00285-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 146.D'Amato F, Robert C, Azhar EI, Fournier P-E, Raoult D. 2014. Draft genome sequence of Coxiella burnetii strain Cb196, an agent of endocarditis in Saudi Arabia. Genome Announc 2:e01180–14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.01180-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Walter MC, Öhrman C, Myrtennäs K, Sjödin A, Byström M, Larsson P, Macellaro A, Forsman M, Frangoulidis D. 2014. Genome sequence of Coxiella burnetii strain Namibia. Stand Genomic Sci 9:22. doi: 10.1186/1944-3277-9-22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Million M, Roblot F, Carles D, D'Amato F, Protopopescu C, Carrieri MP, Raoult D. 2014. Reevaluation of the risk of fetal death and malformation after Q fever. Clin Infect Dis 59:256–260. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Walter MC, Vincent GA, Stenos J, Graves S, Frangoulidis D. 2014. Genome sequence of Coxiella burnetii strain AuQ01 (Arandale) from an Australian patient with acute Q fever. Genome Announc 2:e00964–14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00964-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Hammerl JA, Mertens K, Sprague LD, Hackert VH, Buijs J, Hoebe CJ, Henning K, Neubauer H, Al Dahouk S. 2015. First draft genome sequence of a human Coxiella burnetii isolate, originating from the largest Q fever outbreak ever reported, the Netherlands, 2007 to 2010. Genome Announc 3:e00445–15. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00445-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Merhej V, Raoult D. 2011. Rickettsial evolution in the light of comparative genomics. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 86:379–405. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00151.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Fournier P-E, El Karkouri K, Leroy Q, Robert C, Giumelli B, Renesto P, Socolovschi C, Parola P, Audic S, Raoult D. 2009. Analysis of the Rickettsia africae genome reveals that virulence acquisition in Rickettsia species may be explained by genome reduction. BMC Genomics 10:166. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Cole ST, Eiglmeier K, Parkhill J, James KD, Thomson NR, Wheeler PR, Honoré N, Garnier T, Churcher C, Harris D, Mungall K, Basham D, Brown D, Chillingworth T, Connor R, Davies RM, Devlin K, Duthoy S, Feltwell T, Fraser A, Hamlin N, Holroyd S, Hornsby T, Jagels K, Lacroix C, Maclean J, Moule S, Murphy L, Oliver K, Quail MA, Rajandream MA, Rutherford KM, Rutter S, Seeger K, Simon S, Simmonds M, Skelton J, Squares R, Squares S, Stevens K, Taylor K, Whitehead S, Woodward JR, Barrell BG. 2001. Massive gene decay in the leprosy bacillus. Nature 409:1007–1011. doi: 10.1038/35059006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Georgiades K, Raoult D. 2011. Genomes of the most dangerous epidemic bacteria have a virulence repertoire characterized by fewer genes but more toxin-antitoxin modules. PLoS One 6:e17962. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Fuche F, Vianney A, Andrea C, Doublet P, Gilbert C. 2015. Functional type 1 secretion system involved in Legionella pneumophila virulence. J Bacteriol 197:563–571. doi: 10.1128/JB.02164-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 156.Langley JM, Marrie TJ, Covert A, Waag DM, Williams JC. 1988. Poker players' pneumonia. An urban outbreak of Q fever following exposure to a parturient cat. N Engl J Med 319:354–356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Marrie TJ, Langille D, Papukna V, Yates L. 1989. Truckin' pneumonia—an outbreak of Q fever in a truck repair plant probably due to aerosols from clothing contaminated by contact with newborn kittens. Epidemiol Infect 102:119–127. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800029757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 158.Hendrix LR, Samuel JE, Mallavia LP. 1991. Differentiation of Coxiella burnetii isolates by analysis of restriction-endonuclease-digested DNA separated by SDS-PAGE. J Gen Microbiol 137:269–276. doi: 10.1099/00221287-137-2-269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Minnick MF, Heinzen RA, Reschke DK, Frazier ME, Mallavia LP. 1991. A plasmid-encoded surface protein found in chronic-disease isolates of Coxiella burnetti. Infect Immun 59:4735–4739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Minnick MF, Heinzen RA, Frazier ME, Mallavia LP. 1990. Characterization and expression of the cbbE′ gene of Coxiella burnetii. J Gen Microbiol 136:1099–1107. doi: 10.1099/00221287-136-6-1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Stein A, Raoult D. 1993. Lack of pathotype specific gene in human Coxiella burnetii isolates. Microb Pathog 15:177–185. doi: 10.1006/mpat.1993.1068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.Valková D, Kazár J. 1995. A new plasmid (QpDV) common to Coxiella burnetii isolates associated with acute and chronic Q fever. FEMS Microbiol Lett 125:275–280. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07368.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Thiele D, Willems H. 1994. Is plasmid based differentiation of Coxiella burnetii in ”acute“ and “chronic” isolates still valid? Eur J Epidemiol 10:427–434. doi: 10.1007/BF01719667. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Angelakis E, Million M, D'Amato F, Rouli L, Richet H, Stein A, Rolain J-M, Raoult D. 2013. Q fever and pregnancy: disease, prevention, and strain specificity. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32:361–368. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1750-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.D'Amato F, Eldin C, Raoult D. 2016. The contribution of genomics to the study of Q fever. Future Microbiol 11(2):253–272. doi: 10.2217/fmb.15.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Leroy Q, Armougom F, Barbry P, Raoult D. 2011. Genomotyping of Coxiella burnetii using microarrays reveals a conserved genomotype for hard tick isolates. PLoS One 6:e25781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025781. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Loftis AD, Priestley RA, Massung RF. 2010. Detection of Coxiella burnetii in commercially available raw milk from the United States. Foodborne Pathog Dis 7:1453–1456. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2010.0579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Svraka S, Toman R, Skultety L, Slaba K, Homan WL. 2006. Establishment of a genotyping scheme for Coxiella burnetii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 254:268–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2005.00036.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Arricau-Bouvery N, Hauck Y, Bejaoui A, Frangoulidis D, Bodier CC, Souriau A, Meyer H, Neubauer H, Rodolakis A, Vergnaud G. 2006. Molecular characterization of Coxiella burnetii isolates by infrequent restriction site-PCR and MLVA typing. BMC Microbiol 6:38. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Boden K, Wolf K, Hermann B, Frangoulidis D. 2015. First isolation of Coxiella burnetii from clinical material by cell-free medium (ACCM2). Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 34:1017–1022. doi: 10.1007/s10096-015-2321-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Piñero A, Barandika JF, García-Pérez AL, Hurtado A. 2015. Genetic diversity and variation over time of Coxiella burnetii genotypes in dairy cattle and the farm environment. Infect Genet Evol 31:231–235. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2015.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Sulyok KM, Kreizinger Z, Hornstra HM, Pearson T, Szigeti A, Dán Á Balla E, Keim PS, Gyuranecz M. 2014. Genotyping of Coxiella burnetii from domestic ruminants and human in Hungary: indication of various genotypes. BMC Vet Res 10:107. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-10-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Gyuranecz M, Sulyok K, Balla E, Mag T, Balazs A, Simor Z, Denes B, Hornok S, Bajnoczi P, Hornstra H, Pearson T, Keim P, Dan A. 2014. Q fever epidemic in Hungary, April to July 2013. Euro Surveill 19(30):pii=20863 http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20863. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Račić I, Spičić S, Galov A, Duvnjak S, Zdelar-Tuk M, Vujnović A, Habrun B, Cvetnić Z. 2014. Identification of Coxiella burnetii genotypes in Croatia using multi-locus VNTR analysis. Vet Microbiol 173:340–347. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2014.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 175.Tilburg JJHC, Roest HJIJ, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Horrevorts AM, Klaassen CHW. 2012. Genotyping reveals the presence of a predominant genotype of Coxiella burnetii in consumer milk products. J Clin Microbiol 50:2156–2158. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06831-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Tilburg JJHC, Roest HJIJ, Buffet S, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Horrevorts AM, Raoult D, Klaassen CHW. 2012. Epidemic genotype of Coxiella burnetii among goats, sheep, and humans in the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 18:887–889. doi: 10.3201/eid1805.111907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 177.Frangoulidis D, Walter MC, Antwerpen M, Zimmermann P, Janowetz B, Alex M, Böttcher J, Henning K, Hilbert A, Ganter M, Runge M, Münsterkötter M, Splettstoesser WD, Hanczaruk M. 2014. Molecular analysis of Coxiella burnetii in Germany reveals evolution of unique clonal clusters. Int J Med Microbiol 304:868–876. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.06.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Mori M, Boarbi S, Michel P, Bakinahe R, Rits K, Wattiau P, Fretin D. 2013. In vitro and in vivo infectious potential of coxiella burnetii: a study on Belgian livestock isolates. PLoS One 8:e67622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0067622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 179.Astobiza I, Tilburg JJHC, Piñero A, Hurtado A, García-Pérez AL, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Klaassen CHW. 2012. Genotyping of Coxiella burnetii from domestic ruminants in northern Spain. BMC Vet Res 8:241. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-241. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 180.de Bruin A, van Alphen PTW, van der Plaats RQJ, de Heer LND, Reusken CBEM, van Rotterdam BJ, Janse I. 2012. Molecular typing of Coxiella burnetii from animal and environmental matrices during Q fever epidemics in the Netherlands. BMC Vet Res 8:165. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Reichel R, Mearns R, Brunton L, Jones R, Horigan M, Vipond R, Vincent G, Evans S. 2012. Description of a Coxiella burnetii abortion outbreak in a dairy goat herd, and associated serology, PCR and genotyping results. Res Vet Sci 93:1217–1224. doi: 10.1016/j.rvsc.2012.04.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Tilburg JJHC, Rossen JWA, van Hannen EJ, Melchers WJG, Hermans MHA, van de Bovenkamp J, Roest HJIJ, de Bruin A, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Horrevorts AM, Klaassen CHW. 2012. Genotypic diversity of Coxiella burnetii in the 2007-2010 Q fever outbreak episodes in The Netherlands. J Clin Microbiol 50:1076–1078. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05497-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Roest HIJ, van Solt CB, Tilburg JJHC, Klaassen CHW, Hovius EK, Roest FTF, Vellema P, van den Brom R, van Zijderveld FG. 2013. Search for possible additional reservoirs for human Q fever, The Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 19:834–835. doi: 10.3201/eid1905.121489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Santos AS, Tilburg JJHC, Botelho A, Barahona MJ, Núncio MS, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Klaassen CHW. 2012. Genotypic diversity of clinical Coxiella burnetii isolates from Portugal based on MST and MLVA typing. Int J Med Microbiol 302:253–256. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2012.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 185.van Belkum A. 2007. Tracing isolates of bacterial species by multilocus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA). FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 49:22–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2006.00173.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Glazunova O, Roux V, Freylikman O, Sekeyova Z, Fournous G, Tyczka J, Tokarevich N, Kovacava E, Marrie TJ, Raoult D. 2005. Coxiella burnetii genotyping. Emerg Infect Dis 11:1211–1217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Briggs BJ, Raoult D, Hijazi ZM, Edouard S, Angelakis E, Logan LK. 2016. Coxiella burnetii endocarditis in a child caused by a new genotype. Pediatr Infect Dis J 35:213–214. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Kumsa B, Socolovschi C, Almeras L, Raoult D, Parola P. 2015. Occurrence and genotyping of Coxiella burnetii in ixodid ticks in Oromia, Ethiopia. Am J Trop Med Hyg 93:1074–1081. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Hornstra HM, Priestley RA, Georgia SM, Kachur S, Birdsell DN, Hilsabeck R, Gates LT, Samuel JE, Heinzen RA, Kersh GJ, Keim P, Massung RF, Pearson T. 2011. Rapid typing of Coxiella burnetii. PLoS One 6:e26201. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 190.Bauer AE, Olivas S, Cooper M, Hornstra H, Keim P, Pearson T, Johnson AJ. 2015. Estimated herd prevalence and sequence types of Coxiella burnetii in bulk tank milk samples from commercial dairies in Indiana. BMC Vet Res 11:186. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0517-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Angelakis E, Johani S, Ahsan A, Memish Z, Raoult D. 2014. Q fever endocarditis and new Coxiella burnetii genotype, Saudi Arabia. Emerg Infect Dis 20:726–728. doi: 10.3201/eid2004.131603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Mahamat A, Edouard S, Demar M, Abboud P, Patrice J-Y, La Scola B, Okandze A, Djossou F, Raoult D. 2013. Unique clone of Coxiella burnetii causing severe Q fever, French Guiana. Emerg Infect Dis 19:1102–1104. doi: 10.3201/eid1907.130044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Huijsmans CJJ, Schellekens JJA, Wever PC, Toman R, Savelkoul PHM, Janse I, Hermans MHA. 2011. Single-nucleotide-polymorphism genotyping of Coxiella burnetii during a Q fever outbreak in The Netherlands. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:2051–2057. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02293-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Dal Pozzo F, Renaville B, Martinelle L, Renaville R, Thys C, Smeets F, Kirschvink N, Grégoire F, Delooz L, Czaplicki G, Saegerman C. 2016. Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping and distribution of Coxiella burnetii strains from field samples in Belgium. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:81–86. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02799-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Pearson T, Hornstra HM, Hilsabeck R, Gates LT, Olivas SM, Birdsell DM, Hall CM, German S, Cook JM, Seymour ML, Priestley RA, Kondas AV, Clark Friedman CL, Price EP, Schupp JM, Liu CM, Price LB, Massung RF, Kersh GJ, Keim P. 2014. High prevalence and two dominant host-specific genotypes of Coxiella burnetii in U.S. milk. BMC Microbiol 14:41. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Hermans MHA, Huijsmans CRJJ, Schellekens JJA, Savelkoul PHM, Wever PC. 2011. Coxiella burnetii DNA in goat milk after vaccination with Coxevac(®). Vaccine 29:2653–2656. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.01.111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Karlsson E, Macellaro A, Byström M, Forsman M, Frangoulidis D, Janse I, Larsson P, Lindgren P, Öhrman C, van Rotterdam B, Sjödin A, Myrtennäs K. 2014. Eight new genomes and synthetic controls increase the accessibility of rapid Melt-MAMA SNP typing of Coxiella burnetii. PLoS One 9:e85417. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.Jado I, Carranza-Rodríguez C, Barandika JF, Toledo Á García-Amil C, Serrano B, Bolaños M, Gil H, Escudero R, García-Pérez AL, Olmeda AS, Astobiza I, Lobo B, Rodríguez-Vargas M, Pérez-Arellano JL, López-Gatius F, Pascual-Velasco F, Cilla G, Rodríguez NF, Anda P. 2012. Molecular method for the characterization of Coxiella burnetii from clinical and environmental samples: variability of genotypes in Spain. BMC Microbiol 12:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-12-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Sidi-Boumedine K, Duquesne V, Fernandes I, Marro S, Thiéry R. 2009. Evaluation of randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) for discrimination of Coxiella burnetii ruminant strains isolated in France. Clin Microbiol Infect 15(Suppl 2):S194–S195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Roux V, Bergoin M, Lamaze N, Raoult D. 1997. Reassessment of the taxonomic position of Rickettsiella grylli. Int J Syst Bacteriol 47:1255–1257. doi: 10.1099/00207713-47-4-1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Moliner C, Raoult D, Fournier P-E. 2009. Evidence that the intra-amoebal Legionella drancourtii acquired a sterol reductase gene from eukaryotes. BMC Res Notes 2:51. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 202.Lamrabet O, Merhej V, Pontarotti P, Raoult D, Drancourt M. 2012. The genealogic tree of mycobacteria reveals a long-standing sympatric life into free-living protozoa. PLoS One 7:e34754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 203.Tan CK, Owens L. 2000. Infectivity, transmission and 16S rRNA sequencing of a rickettsia, Coxiella cheraxi sp. nov, from the freshwater crayfish Cherax quadricarinatus. Dis Aquat Organ 41:115–122. doi: 10.3354/dao041115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 204.Smith TA, Driscoll T, Gillespie JJ, Raghavan R. 2015. A Coxiella-like endosymbiont is a potential vitamin source for the Lone Star tick. Genome Biol Evol 7:831–838. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 205.Duron O, Noël V, McCoy KD, Bonazzi M, Sidi-Boumedine K, Morel O, Vavre F, Zenner L, Jourdain E, Durand P, Arnathau C, Renaud F, Trape J-F, Biguezoton AS, Cremaschi J, Dietrich M, Léger E, Appelgren A, Dupraz M, Gómez-Díaz E, Diatta G, Dayo G-K, Adakal H, Zoungrana S, Vial L, Chevillon C. 2015. The recent evolution of a maternally-inherited endosymbiont of ticks led to the emergence of the Q fever pathogen, Coxiella burnetii. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004892. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 206.Duron O, Jourdain E, McCoy KD. 2014. Diversity and global distribution of the Coxiella intracellular bacterium in seabird ticks. Ticks Tick-Borne Dis 5:557–563. doi: 10.1016/j.ttbdis.2014.04.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 207.Gottlieb Y, Lalzar I, Klasson L. 2015. Distinctive genome reduction rates revealed by genomic analyses of two Coxiella-like endosymbionts in ticks. Genome Biol Evol 7:1779–1796. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 208.Angelakis E, Mediannikov O, Jos S-L, Berenger J-M, Parola P, Raoult D. 2016. Candidatus Coxiella massiliensis Infection. Emerg Infect Dis 22:285–288. doi: 10.3201/eid2202.150106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 209.Suhan ML, Chen SY, Thompson HA. 1996. Transformation of Coxiella burnetii to ampicillin resistance. J Bacteriol 178:2701–2708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 210.Suhan M, Chen SY, Thompson HA, Hoover TA, Hill A, Williams JC. 1994. Cloning and characterization of an autonomous replication sequence from Coxiella burnetii. J Bacteriol 176:5233–5243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 211.Lukácová M, Valková D, Quevedo Diaz M, Perecko D, Barák I. 1999. Green fluorescent protein as a detection marker for Coxiella burnetii transformation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 175:255–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 212.Beare PA, Howe D, Cockrell DC, Omsland A, Hansen B, Heinzen RA. 2009. Characterization of a Coxiella burnetii ftsZ mutant generated by Himar1 transposon mutagenesis. J Bacteriol 191:1369–1381. doi: 10.1128/JB.01580-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 213.Beare PA, Larson CL, Gilk SD, Heinzen RA. 2012. Two systems for targeted gene deletion in Coxiella burnetii. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4580–4589. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00881-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 214.Sidwell RW, Gebhardt LP. 1962. Q fever antibody response in experimentally infected wild rodents and laboratory animals. J Immunol 89:318–322. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 215.Sidwell RW, Thorpe BD, Gebhardt LP. 1964. Studies of latent Q fever infections. II. Effects of multiple cortisone injections. Am J Hyg 79:320–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 216.Sidwell RW, Thorpe BD, Gebhardt LP. 1964. Studies on latent Q Fever infections. I. Effects of whole body X-irradiation upon latently infected guinea pigs, white mice and deer mice. Am J Hyg 79:113–124. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 217.Hackstadt T. 1990. The role of lipopolysaccharides in the virulence of Coxiella burnetii. Ann N Y Acad Sci 590:27–32. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb42203.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 218.Bewley KR. 2013. Animal models of Q fever (Coxiella burnetii). Comp Med 63:469–476. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 219.Gonder JC, Kishimoto RA, Kastello MD, Pedersen CE, Larson EW. 1979. Cynomolgus monkey model for experimental Q fever infection. J Infect Dis 139:191–196. doi: 10.1093/infdis/139.2.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 220.Kishimoto RA, Gonder JC, Johnson JW, Reynolds JA, Larson EW. 1981. Evaluation of a killed phase I Coxiella burnetii vaccine in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis). Lab Anim Sci 31:48–51. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 221.Scott GH, Williams JC, Stephenson EH. 1987. Animal models in Q fever: pathological responses of inbred mice to phase I Coxiella burnetii. J Gen Microbiol 133:691–700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 222.Marmion BP, Storm PA, Ayres JG, Semendric L, Mathews L, Winslow W, Turra M, Harris RJ. 2005. Long-term persistence of Coxiella burnetii after acute primary Q fever. QJM 98:7–20. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hci009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 223.Russell-Lodrigue KE, Andoh M, Poels MWJ, Shive HR, Weeks BR, Zhang GQ, Tersteeg C, Masegi T, Hotta A, Yamaguchi T, Fukushi H, Hirai K, McMurray DN, Samuel JE. 2009. Coxiella burnetii isolates cause genogroup-specific virulence in mouse and guinea pig models of acute Q fever. Infect Immun 77:5640–5650. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00851-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 224.Waag DM, Byrne WR, Estep J, Gibbs P, Pitt ML, Banfield CM. 1999. Evaluation of cynomolgus (Macaca fascicularis) and rhesus (Macaca mulatta) monkeys as experimental models of acute Q fever after aerosol exposure to phase-I Coxiella burnetii. Lab Anim Sci 49:634–638. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 225.Kishimoto RA, Rozmiarek H, Larson EW. 1978. Experimental Q fever infection in congenitally athymic nude mice. Infect Immun 22:69–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 226.Meghari S, Bechah Y, Capo C, Lepidi H, Raoult D, Murray PJ, Mege J-L. 2008. Persistent Coxiella burnetii infection in mice overexpressing IL-10: an efficient model for chronic Q fever pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog 4:e23. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0040023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 227.Ghigo E, Capo C, Raoult D, Mege JL. 2001. Interleukin-10 stimulates Coxiella burnetii replication in human monocytes through tumor necrosis factor down-modulation: role in microbicidal defect of Q fever. Infect Immun 69:2345–2352. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.4.2345-2352.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 228.La Scola B, Lepidi H, Maurin M, Raoult D. 1998. A guinea pig model for Q fever endocarditis. J Infect Dis 178:278–281. doi: 10.1086/517453. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 229.Russell-Lodrigue KE, Zhang GQ, McMurray DN, Samuel JE. 2006. Clinical and pathologic changes in a guinea pig aerosol challenge model of acute Q fever. Infect Immun 74:6085–6091. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00763-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 230.Baumgärtner W, Dettinger H, Schmeer N. 1993. Spread and distribution of Coxiella burnetii in C57BL/6J (H-2b) and Balb/cJ (H-2d) mice after intraperitoneal infection. J Comp Pathol 108:165–184. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9975(08)80219-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 231.Stein A, Louveau C, Lepidi H, Ricci F, Baylac P, Davoust B, Raoult D. 2005. Q fever pneumonia: virulence of Coxiella burnetii pathovars in a murine model of aerosol infection. Infect Immun 73:2469–2477. doi: 10.1128/IAI.73.4.2469-2477.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 232.Stein A, Lepidi H, Mege JL, Marrie TJ, Raoult D. 2000. Repeated pregnancies in BALB/c mice infected with Coxiella burnetii cause disseminated infection, resulting in stillbirth and endocarditis. J Infect Dis 181:188–194. doi: 10.1086/315166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 233.Schoffelen T, Wegdam-Blans MC, Ammerdorffer A, Pronk MJH, Soethoudt YEP, Netea MG, van der Meer JWM, Bleeker-Rovers CP, van Deuren M. 2015. Specific in vitro interferon-gamma and IL-2 production as biomarkers during treatment of chronic Q fever. Front Microbiol 6:93. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 234.Moos A, Hackstadt T. 1987. Comparative virulence of intra- and interstrain lipopolysaccharide variants of Coxiella burnetii in the guinea pig model. Infect Immun 55:1144–1150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 235.Kazár J, Lesý M, Propper P, Valková D, Brezina R. 1993. Comparison of virulence for guinea pigs and mice of different Coxiella burnetii phase I strains. Acta Virol 37:437–448. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 236.Moos A, Vishwanath S, Hackstadt T. 1988. Experimental Q fever endocarditis in rabbit. In Seventh National Meeting of the American Society for Rickettsiology and Rickettsial Diseases, 1988. American Society for Rickettsiology and Rickettsial Diseases, Santa Fe, NM. [Google Scholar]
- 237.Melenotte C, Lepidi H, Nappez C, Bechah Y, Audoly G, Terras J, Raoult D, Bregeon F. 2016. Mouse model of Coxiella burnetii aerosolization. Infect Immun 84:2116–2123. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00108-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 238.Edouard S, Mahamat A, Demar M, Abboud P, Djossou F, Raoult D. 2014. Comparison between emerging Q fever in French Guiana and endemic Q fever in Marseille, France. Am J Trop Med Hyg 90:915–919. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 239.Segal G, Shuman HA. 1999. Possible origin of the Legionella pneumophila virulence genes and their relation to Coxiella burnetii. Mol Microbiol 33:669–670. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01511.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 240.Beare PA, Gilk SD, Larson CL, Hill J, Stead CM, Omsland A, Cockrell DC, Howe D, Voth DE, Heinzen RA. 2011. Dot/Icm type IVB secretion system requirements for Coxiella burnetii growth in human macrophages. mBio 2:e00175–11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00175-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 241.Carey KL, Newton HJ, Lührmann A, Roy CR. 2011. The Coxiella burnetii Dot/Icm system delivers a unique repertoire of type IV effectors into host cells and is required for intracellular replication. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002056. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002056. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 242.Zamboni DS, Campos MA, Torrecilhas ACT, Kiss K, Samuel JE, Golenbock DT, Lauw FN, Roy CR, Almeida IC, Gazzinelli RT. 2004. Stimulation of Toll-like receptor 2 by Coxiella burnetii is required for macrophage production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and resistance to infection. J Biol Chem 279:54405–54415. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M410340200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 243.Toman R, Hussein A, Palkovic P, Ftácek P. 2003. Structural properties of lipopolysaccharides from Coxiella burnetii strains Henzerling and S. Ann N Y Acad Sci 990:563–567. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07427.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 244.Hackstadt T, Peacock MG, Hitchcock PJ, Cole RL. 1985. Lipopolysaccharide variation in Coxiella burnetti: intrastrain heterogeneity in structure and antigenicity. Infect Immun 48:359–365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 245.Thompson HA, Hoover TA, Vodkin MH, Shaw EI. 2003. Do chromosomal deletions in the lipopolysaccharide biosynthetic regions explain all cases of phase variation in Coxiella burnetii strains? An update. Ann N Y Acad Sci 990:664–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2003.tb07441.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 246.Capo C, Lindberg FP, Meconi S, Zaffran Y, Tardei G, Brown EJ, Raoult D, Mege JL. 1999. Subversion of monocyte functions by Coxiella burnetii: impairment of the cross-talk between alphavbeta3 integrin and CR3. J Immunol 163:6078–6085. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 247.Meconi S, Jacomo V, Boquet P, Raoult D, Mege JL, Capo C. 1998. Coxiella burnetii induces reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton in human monocytes. Infect Immun 66:5527–5533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 248.Baca OG, Roman MJ, Glew RH, Christner RF, Buhler JE, Aragon AS. 1993. Acid phosphatase activity in Coxiella burnetii: a possible virulence factor. Infect Immun 61:4232–4239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 249.Cianciotto NP. 2001. Pathogenicity of Legionella pneumophila. Int J Med Microbiol 291:331–343. doi: 10.1078/1438-4221-00139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 250.Baca OG, Mallavia LP. 2006. Rickettsial infection and immunity. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin, Germany. [Google Scholar]
- 251.Capo C, Mege J-L. 2012. Role of innate and adaptive immunity in the control of Q fever. Adv Exp Med Biol 984:273–286. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4315-1_14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 252.Pellegrin M, Delsol G, Auvergnat JC, Familiades J, Faure H, Guiu M, Voigt JJ. 1980. Granulomatous hepatitis in Q fever. Hum Pathol 11:51–57. doi: 10.1016/S0046-8177(80)80105-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 253.Srigley JR, Vellend H, Palmer N, Phillips MJ, Geddie WR, Van Nostrand AW, Edwards VD. 1985. Q-fever. The liver and bone marrow pathology. Am J Surg Pathol 9:752–758. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 254.Elliott A, Schoenlaub L, Freches D, Mitchell W, Zhang G. 2015. Neutrophils play an important role in protective immunity against Coxiella burnetii infection. Infect Immun 83:3104–3113. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00042-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 255.Delaby A, Gorvel L, Espinosa L, Lépolard C, Raoult D, Ghigo E, Capo C, Mege J-L. 2012. Defective monocyte dynamics in Q fever granuloma deficiency. J Infect Dis 205:1086–1094. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 256.Faugaret D, Ben Amara A, Alingrin J, Daumas A, Delaby A, Lépolard C, Raoult D, Textoris J, Mège J-L. 2014. Granulomatous response to Coxiella burnetii, the agent of Q fever: the lessons from gene expression analysis. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:172. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 257.Benoit M, Barbarat B, Bernard A, Olive D, Mege J-L. 2008. Coxiella burnetii, the agent of Q fever, stimulates an atypical M2 activation program in human macrophages. Eur J Immunol 38:1065–1070. doi: 10.1002/eji.200738067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 258.Shannon JG, Howe D, Heinzen RA. 2005. Lack of dendritic cell maturation following infection by Coxiella burnetii synthesizing different lipopolysaccharide chemotypes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1063:154–160. doi: 10.1196/annals.1355.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 259.Gorvel L, Textoris J, Banchereau R, Ben Amara A, Tantibhedhyangkul W, von Bargen K, Ka MB, Capo C, Ghigo E, Gorvel J-P, Mege J-L. 2014. Intracellular bacteria interfere with dendritic cell functions: role of the type I interferon pathway. PLoS One 9:e99420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 260.Honstettre A, Ghigo E, Moynault A, Capo C, Toman R, Akira S, Takeuchi O, Lepidi H, Raoult D, Mege J-L. 2004. Lipopolysaccharide from Coxiella burnetii is involved in bacterial phagocytosis, filamentous actin reorganization, and inflammatory responses through Toll-like receptor 4. J Immunol 172:3695–3703. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.6.3695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 261.Meghari S, Honstettre A, Lepidi H, Ryffel B, Raoult D, Mege J-L. 2005. TLR2 is necessary to inflammatory response in Coxiella burnetii infection. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1063:161–166. doi: 10.1196/annals.1355.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 262.Ammerdorffer A, Schoffelen T, Gresnigt MS, Oosting M, den Brok MH, Abdollahi-Roodsaz S, Kanneganti T-D, de Jong DJ, van Deuren M, Roest H-J, Rebel JM, Netea MG, Joosten LAB, Sprong T. 2015. Recognition of Coxiella burnetii by Toll-like receptors and nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors. J Infect Dis 211:978–987. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 263.Ammerdorffer A, Stappers MHT, Oosting M, Schoffelen T, Hagenaars JCJP, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Wegdam-Blans MC, Wever PC, Roest H-J, van de Vosse E, Netea MG, Sprong T, Joosten LAB. 2016. Genetic variation in TLR10 is not associated with chronic Q fever, despite the inhibitory effect of TLR10 on Coxiella burnetii-induced cytokines in vitro. Cytokine 77:196–202. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2015.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 264.Andoh M, Naganawa T, Hotta A, Yamaguchi T, Fukushi H, Masegi T, Hirai K. 2003. SCID mouse model for lethal Q fever. Infect Immun 71:4717–4723. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4717-4723.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 265.Read AJ, Erickson S, Harmsen AG. 2010. Role of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in clearance of primary pulmonary infection with Coxiella burnetii. Infect Immun 78:3019–3026. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00101-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 266.Ka MB, Bechah Y, Olive D, Mege J-L. 2015. Programmed death ligand-1 expression and memory T-cell generation in Coxiella burnetii infection. Microb Pathog 80:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 267.Zhang G, Russell-Lodrigue KE, Andoh M, Zhang Y, Hendrix LR, Samuel JE. 2007. Mechanisms of vaccine-induced protective immunity against Coxiella burnetii infection in BALB/c mice. J Immunol 179:8372–8380. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.12.8372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 268.Xiong X, Qi Y, Jiao J, Gong W, Duan C, Wen B. 2014. Exploratory study on Th1 epitope-induced protective immunity against Coxiella burnetii infection. PLoS One 9:e87206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 269.Andoh M, Zhang G, Russell-Lodrigue KE, Shive HR, Weeks BR, Samuel JE. 2007. T cells are essential for bacterial clearance, and gamma interferon, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and B cells are crucial for disease development in Coxiella burnetii infection in mice. Infect Immun 75:3245–3255. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01767-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 270.Dellacasagrande J, Capo C, Raoult D, Mege JL. 1999. IFN-gamma-mediated control of Coxiella burnetii survival in monocytes: the role of cell apoptosis and TNF. J Immunol 1950 162:2259–2265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 271.Akporiaye ET, Stefanovich D, Tsosie V, Baca G. 1990. Coxiella burnetii fails to stimulate human neutrophil superoxide anion production. Acta Virol 34:64–70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 272.Yoshiie K, Matayoshi S, Fujimura T, Maeno N, Oda H. 1999. Induced production of nitric oxide and sensitivity of alveolar macrophages derived from mice with different sensitivity to Coxiella burnetii. Acta Virol 43:273–278. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 273.Brennan RE, Russell K, Zhang G, Samuel JE. 2004. Both inducible nitric oxide synthase and NADPH oxidase contribute to the control of virulent phase I Coxiella burnetii infections. Infect Immun 72:6666–6675. doi: 10.1128/IAI.72.11.6666-6675.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 274.Ghigo E, Capo C, Tung C-H, Raoult D, Gorvel J-P, Mege J-L. 2002. Coxiella burnetii survival in THP-1 monocytes involves the impairment of phagosome maturation: IFN-gamma mediates its restoration and bacterial killing. J Immunol 169:4488–4495. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.8.4488. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 275.Dellacasagrande J, Ghigo E, Capo C, Raoult D, Mege JL. 2000. Coxiella burnetii survives in monocytes from patients with Q fever endocarditis: involvement of tumor necrosis factor. Infect Immun 68:160–164. doi: 10.1128/IAI.68.1.160-164.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 276.Koster FT, Williams JC, Goodwin JS. 1985. Cellular immunity in Q fever: specific lymphocyte unresponsiveness in Q fever endocarditis. J Infect Dis 152:1283–1289. doi: 10.1093/infdis/152.6.1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 277.Izzo AA, Marmion BP. 1993. Variation in interferon-gamma responses to Coxiella burnetii antigens with lymphocytes from vaccinated or naturally infected subjects. Clin Exp Immunol 94:507–515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 278.Schoffelen T, Joosten LAB, Herremans T, de Haan AFJ, Ammerdorffer A, Rümke HC, Wijkmans CJ, Roest HIJ, Netea MG, van der Meer JWM, Sprong T, van Deuren M. 2013. Specific interferon γ detection for the diagnosis of previous Q fever. Clin Infect Dis 56:1742–1751. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 279.Schoffelen T, Sprong T, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Wegdam-Blans MCA, Ammerdorffer A, Pronk MJH, Soethoudt YEP, van Kasteren MEE, Herremans T, Bijlmer HA, Netea MG, van der Meer JWM, Joosten LA, van Deuren BM. 2014. A combination of interferon-gamma and interleukin-2 production by Coxiella burnetii-stimulated circulating cells discriminates between chronic Q fever and past Q fever. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:642–650. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 280.Schoffelen T, Limonard GJM, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Bouwman JJM, van der Meer JWM, Nabuurs-Franssen M, Sprong T, van Deuren M. 2014. Diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii infection: comparison of a whole blood interferon-gamma production assay and a Coxiella ELISPOT. PLoS One 9:e103749. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0103749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 281.Sabatier F, Dignat-George F, Mège JL, Brunet C, Raoult D, Sampol J. 1997. CD4+ T-cell lymphopenia in Q fever endocarditis. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 4:89–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 282.Ka MB, Gondois-Rey F, Capo C, Textoris J, Million M, Raoult D, Olive D, Mege J-L. 2014. Imbalance of circulating monocyte subsets and PD-1 dysregulation in Q fever endocarditis: the role of IL-10 in PD-1 modulation. PLoS One 9:e107533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 283.Layez C, Brunet C, Lépolard C, Ghigo E, Capo C, Raoult D, Mege J-L. 2012. Foxp3(+)CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T cells are increased in patients with Coxiella burnetii endocarditis. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 64:137–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2011.00902.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 284.Meghari S, Capo C, Raoult D, Mege J-L. 2006. Deficient transendothelial migration of leukocytes in Q fever: the role played by interleukin-10. J Infect Dis 194:365–369. doi: 10.1086/505227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 285.Penttila IA, Harris RJ, Storm P, Haynes D, Worswick DA, Marmion BP. 1998. Cytokine dysregulation in the post-Q-fever fatigue syndrome. QJM 91:549–560. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/91.8.549. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 286.Capo C, Zugun F, Stein A, Tardei G, Lepidi H, Raoult D, Mege JL. 1996. Upregulation of tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin-1 beta in Q fever endocarditis. Infect Immun 64:1638–1642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 287.Honstettre A, Imbert G, Ghigo E, Gouriet F, Capo C, Raoult D, Mege J-L. 2003. Dysregulation of cytokines in acute Q fever: role of interleukin-10 and tumor necrosis factor in chronic evolution of Q fever. J Infect Dis 187:956–962. doi: 10.1086/368129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 288.Burnet FM, Freeman M. 1941. Studies of the X strain (Dyer) of Rickettsia burneti. II. Guinea pig infections, with special reference to immunological phenomena. J Immunol 40:421–436. [Google Scholar]
- 289.Wen BH, Yu SR. 1987. Antigen-specific circulating immune complexes in Coxiella burnetii-infected guinea pigs. Exp Mol Pathol 47:175–184. doi: 10.1016/0014-4800(87)90072-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 290.Desnues B, Imbert G, Raoult D, Mege J-L, Ghigo E. 2009. Role of specific antibodies in Coxiella burnetii infection of macrophages. Clin Microbiol Infect 15(Suppl 2):S161–S162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 291.Shannon JG, Cockrell DC, Takahashi K, Stahl GL, Heinzen RA. 2009. Antibody-mediated immunity to the obligate intracellular bacterial pathogen Coxiella burnetii is Fc receptor- and complement-independent. BMC Immunol 10:26. doi: 10.1186/1471-2172-10-26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 292.Levy P, Raoult D, Razongles JJ. 1989. Q-fever and autoimmunity. Eur J Epidemiol 5:447–453. doi: 10.1007/BF00140139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 293.Camacho MT, Outschoorn I, Tellez A, Sequí J. 2005. Autoantibody profiles in the sera of patients with Q fever: characterization of antigens by immunofluorescence, immunoblot and sequence analysis. J Autoimmune Dis 2:10. doi: 10.1186/1740-2557-2-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 294.Holmes RO, Hartzell JD, Tofferi JK, Roebuck JD, Kelly WF. 2009. Dual high titer antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibodies in association with systemic Q fever. J Clin Rheumatol 15:411–413. doi: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181c3f8a8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 295.Million M, Walter G, Bardin N, Camoin L, Giorgi R, Bongrand P, Gouriet F, Casalta J-P, Thuny F, Habib G, Raoult D. 2013. Immunoglobulin G anticardiolipin antibodies and progression to Q fever endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 57:57–64. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 296.Ghigo E, Colombo MI, Heinzen RA. 2012. The Coxiella burnetii parasitophorous vacuole. Adv Exp Med Biol 984:141–169. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-4315-1_8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 297.Desjardins M, Celis JE, van Meer G, Dieplinger H, Jahraus A, Griffiths G, Huber LA. 1994. Molecular characterization of phagosomes. J Biol Chem 269:32194–32200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 298.Henry RM, Hoppe AD, Joshi N, Swanson JA. 2004. The uniformity of phagosome maturation in macrophages. J Cell Biol 164:185–194. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200307080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 299.Rink J, Ghigo E, Kalaidzidis Y, Zerial M. 2005. Rab conversion as a mechanism of progression from early to late endosomes. Cell 122:735–749. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.06.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 300.Ghigo E, Honstettre A, Capo C, Gorvel J-P, Raoult D, Mege J-L. 2004. Link between impaired maturation of phagosomes and defective Coxiella burnetii killing in patients with chronic Q fever. J Infect Dis 190:1767–1772. doi: 10.1086/425041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 301.Barry AO, Boucherit N, Mottola G, Vadovic P, Trouplin V, Soubeyran P, Capo C, Bonatti S, Nebreda A, Toman R, Lemichez E, Mege J-L, Ghigo E. 2012. Impaired stimulation of p38α-MAPK/Vps41-HOPS by LPS from pathogenic Coxiella burnetii prevents trafficking to microbicidal phagolysosomes. Cell Host Microbe 12:751–763. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.10.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 302.Conti F, Boucherit N, Baldassarre V, Trouplin V, Toman R, Mottola G, Mege J-L, Ghigo E. 2014. Coxiella burnetii lipopolysaccharide blocks p38α-MAPK activation through the disruption of TLR-2 and TLR-4 association. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:182. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 303.Barry AO, Mege J-L, Ghigo E. 2011. Hijacked phagosomes and leukocyte activation: an intimate relationship. J Leukoc Biol 89:373–382. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0510270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 304.Maltezou HC, Constantopoulou I, Kallergi C, Vlahou V, Georgakopoulos D, Kafetzis DA, Raoult D. 2004. Q fever in children in Greece. Am J Trop Med Hyg 70:540–544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 305.Tissot Dupont H, Raoult D, Brouqui P, Janbon F, Peyramond D, Weiller PJ, Chicheportiche C, Nezri M, Poirier R. 1992. Epidemiologic features and clinical presentation of acute Q fever in hospitalized patients: 323 French cases. Am J Med 93:427–434. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(92)90173-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 306.Schoffelen T, Wong A, Rümke HC, Netea MG, Timen A, van Deuren M, Vermeer-de Bondt PE. 2014. Adverse events and association with age, sex and immunological parameters of Q fever vaccination in patients at risk for chronic Q fever in the Netherlands 2011. Vaccine 32:6622–6630. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.09.061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 307.Leone M, Honstettre A, Lepidi H, Capo C, Bayard F, Raoult D, Mege J-L. 2004. Effect of sex on Coxiella burnetii infection: protective role of 17beta-estradiol. J Infect Dis 189:339–345. doi: 10.1086/380798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 308.Textoris J, Ban LH, Capo C, Raoult D, Leone M, Mege J-L. 2010. Sex-related differences in gene expression following Coxiella burnetii infection in mice: potential role of circadian rhythm. PLoS One 5:e12190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 309.Mehraj V, Textoris J, Capo C, Raoult D, Leone M, Mege J-L. 2012. Overexpression of the Per2 gene in male patients with acute Q fever. J Infect Dis 206:1768–1770. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jis600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 310.Maltezou HC, Raoult D. 2002. Q fever in children. Lancet Infect Dis 2:686–691. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(02)00440-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 311.Schoffelen T, Herremans T, Sprong T, Nabuurs-Franssen M, Wever PC, Joosten LAB, Netea MG, van der Meer JWM, Bijlmer HA, van Deuren M. 2013. Limited humoral and cellular responses to Q fever vaccination in older adults with risk factors for chronic Q fever. J Infect 67:565–573. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.08.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 312.Roest HIJ, Post J, van Gelderen B, van Zijderveld FG, Rebel JMJ. 2013. Q fever in pregnant goats: humoral and cellular immune responses. Vet Res 44:67. doi: 10.1186/1297-9716-44-67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 313.Nielsen SY, Mølbak K, Henriksen TB, Krogfelt KA, Larsen CS, Villumsen S. 2014. Adverse pregnancy outcomes and Coxiella burnetii antibodies in pregnant women, Denmark. Emerg Infect Dis 20:925–931. doi: 10.3201/eid2006.130584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 314.Ben Amara A, Ghigo E, Le Priol Y, Lépolard C, Salcedo SP, Lemichez E, Bretelle F, Capo C, Mege J-L. 2010. Coxiella burnetii, the agent of Q fever, replicates within trophoblasts and induces a unique transcriptional response. PLoS One 5:e15315. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 315.Gorvel L, Ben Amara A, Ka MB, Textoris J, Gorvel J-P, Mege J-L. 2014. Myeloid decidual dendritic cells and immunoregulation of pregnancy: defective responsiveness to Coxiella burnetii and Brucella abortus. Front Cell Infect Microbiol 4:179. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 316.Thuny F, Textoris J, Amara AB, Filali AE, Capo C, Habib G, Raoult D, Mege J-L. 2012. The gene expression analysis of blood reveals S100A11 and AQP9 as potential biomarkers of infective endocarditis. PLoS One 7:e31490. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 317.Benoit M, Thuny F, Le Priol Y, Lepidi H, Bastonero S, Casalta J-P, Collart F, Capo C, Raoult D, Mege J-L. 2010. The transcriptional programme of human heart valves reveals the natural history of infective endocarditis. PLoS One 5:e8939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 318.Wu HD, Maurer MS, Friedman RA, Marboe CC, Ruiz-Vazquez EM, Ramakrishnan R, Schwartz A, Tilson MD, Stewart AS, Winchester R. 2007. The lymphocytic infiltration in calcific aortic stenosis predominantly consists of clonally expanded T cells. J Immunol 178:5329–5339. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.8.5329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 319.Winchester R, Wiesendanger M, O'Brien W, Zhang H-Z, Maurer MS, Gillam LD, Schwartz A, Marboe C, Stewart AS. 2011. Circulating activated and effector memory T cells are associated with calcification and clonal expansions in bicuspid and tricuspid valves of calcific aortic stenosis. J Immunol 187:1006–1014. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 320.Million M, Walter G, Thuny F, Habib G, Raoult D. 2013. Evolution from acute Q fever to endocarditis is associated with underlying valvulopathy and age and can be prevented by prolonged antibiotic treatment. Clin Infect Dis 57:836–844. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 321.Cripe L, Andelfinger G, Martin LJ, Shooner K, Benson DW. 2004. Bicuspid aortic valve is heritable. J Am Coll Cardiol 44:138–143. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.03.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 322.Nataatmadja M, West M, West J, Summers K, Walker P, Nagata M, Watanabe T. 2003. Abnormal extracellular matrix protein transport associated with increased apoptosis of vascular smooth muscle cells in marfan syndrome and bicuspid aortic valve thoracic aortic aneurysm. Circulation 108(Suppl 1):329–334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 323.Mege J-L, Meghari S, Honstettre A, Capo C, Raoult D. 2006. The two faces of interleukin 10 in human infectious diseases. Lancet Infect Dis 6:557–569. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(06)70577-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 324.O'Garra A, Vieira P. 2007. T(H)1 cells control themselves by producing interleukin-10. Nat Rev Immunol 7:425–428. doi: 10.1038/nri2097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 325.Hsu DH, de Waal Malefyt R, Fiorentino DF, Dang MN, Vieira P, de Vries J, Spits H, Mosmann TR, Moore KW. 1990. Expression of interleukin-10 activity by Epstein-Barr virus protein BCRF1. Science 250:830–832. doi: 10.1126/science.2173142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 326.Turner J, Gonzalez-Juarrero M, Ellis DL, Basaraba RJ, Kipnis A, Orme IM, Cooper AM. 2002. In vivo IL-10 production reactivates chronic pulmonary tuberculosis in C57BL/6 mice. J Immunol 169:6343–6351. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.169.11.6343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 327.Capo C, Amirayan-Chevillard N, Brouqui P, Raoult D, Mege J-L. 2003. Bartonella quintana bacteremia and overproduction of interleukin-10: model of bacterial persistence in homeless people. J Infect Dis 187:837–844. doi: 10.1086/368384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 328.Lepidi H, Houpikian P, Liang Z, Raoult D. 2003. Cardiac valves in patients with Q fever endocarditis: microbiological, molecular, and histologic studies. J Infect Dis 187:1097–1106. doi: 10.1086/368219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 329.Voorzanger N, Touitou R, Garcia E, Delecluse HJ, Rousset F, Joab I, Favrot MC, Blay JY. 1996. Interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-6 are produced in vivo by non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cells and act as cooperative growth factors. Cancer Res 56:5499–5505. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 330.Lam LT, Wright G, Davis RE, Lenz G, Farinha P, Dang L, Chan JW, Rosenwald A, Gascoyne RD, Staudt LM. 2008. Cooperative signaling through the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and nuclear factor-κB pathways in subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Blood 111:3701–3713. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-09-111948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 331.Gupta M, Han JJ, Stenson M, Maurer M, Wellik L, Hu G, Ziesmer S, Dogan A, Witzig TE. 2012. Elevated serum IL-10 levels in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a mechanism of aberrant JAK2 activation. Blood 119:2844–2853. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-10-388538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 332.Blay JY, Burdin N, Rousset F, Lenoir G, Biron P, Philip T, Banchereau J, Favrot MC. 1993. Serum interleukin-10 in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: a prognostic factor. Blood 82:2169–2174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 333.Béguelin W, Sawh S, Chambwe N, Chan FC, Jiang Y, Choo J-W, Scott DW, Chalmers A, Geng H, Tsikitas L, Tam W, Bhagat G, Gascoyne RD, Shaknovich R. 2015. IL10 receptor is a novel therapeutic target in DLBCLs. Leukemia 29:1684–1694. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.57. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 334.Melenotte C, Million M, Audoly G, Gorse A, Dutronc H, Roland G, Dekel M, Moreno A, Cammilleri S, Carrieri MP, Protopopescu C, Ruminy P, Lepidi H, Nadel B, Mege J-L, Xerri L, Raoult D. 2016. B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma linked to Coxiella burnetii. Blood 127:113–121. doi: 10.1182/blood-2015-04-639617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 335.Ito T, Yang M, Wang Y-H, Lande R, Gregorio J, Perng OA, Qin X-F, Liu Y-J, Gilliet M. 2007. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells prime IL-10-producing T regulatory cells by inducible costimulator ligand. J Exp Med 204:105–115. doi: 10.1084/jem.20061660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 336.Fournier PE, Marrie TJ, Raoult D. 1998. Diagnosis of Q fever. J Clin Microbiol 36:1823–1834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 337.Dupont HT, Thirion X, Raoult D. 1994. Q fever serology: cutoff determination for microimmunofluorescence. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 1:189–196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 338.Murphy AM, Field PR. 1970. The persistence of complement-fixing antibodies to Q-fever (Coxiella burneti) after infection. Med J Aust 1:1148–1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 339.Wielders CCH, Kampschreur LM, Schneeberger PM, Jager MM, Hoepelman AIM, Leenders ACA, Hermans PMHA, Wever PC. 2012. Early diagnosis and treatment of patients with symptomatic acute Q fever do not prohibit IgG antibody responses to Coxiella burnetii. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19:1661–1666. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00322-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 340.Frankel D, Richet H, Renvoisé A, Raoult D. 2011. Q fever in France, 1985-2009. Emerg Infect Dis 17:350–356. doi: 10.3201/eid1703.100882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 341.Edouard S, Million M, Lepidi H, Rolain J-M, Fournier P-E, La Scola B, Grisoli D, Raoult D. 2013. Persistence of DNA in a cured patient and positive culture in cases with low antibody levels bring into question diagnosis of Q fever endocarditis. J Clin Microbiol 51:3012–3017. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00812-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 342.Wegdam-Blans MCA, Wielders CCH, Meekelenkamp J, Korbeeck JM, Herremans T, Tjhie HT, Bijlmer HA, Koopmans MPG, Schneeberger PM. 2012. Evaluation of commonly used serological tests for detection of Coxiella burnetii antibodies in well-defined acute and follow-up sera. Clin Vaccine Immunol 19:1110–1115. doi: 10.1128/CVI.05581-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 343.Wegdam-Blans MCA, Tjhie HT, Korbeeck JM, Nabuurs-Franssen MN, Kampschreur LM, Sprong T, Teijink JA, Koopmans WMP. 2014. Serology in chronic Q fever is still surrounded by question marks. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33:1089–1094. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2048-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 344.Imbert G, La Scola B. 2006. Diagnosis of Q fever using indirect microimmunofluorescence. Methods Mol Biol 345:197–202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 345.Healy B, van Woerden H, Raoult D, Graves S, Pitman J, Lloyd G, Brown N, Llewelyn M. 2011. Chronic Q fever: different serological results in three countries–results of a follow-up study 6 years after a point source outbreak. Clin Infect Dis 52:1013–1019. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 346.Musso D, Raoult D. 1997. Serological cross-reactions between Coxiella burnetii and Legionella micdadei. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 4:208–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 347.La Scola B, Raoult D. 1996. Serological cross-reactions between Bartonella quintana, Bartonella henselae, and Coxiella burnetii. J Clin Microbiol 34:2270–2274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 348.Bizzini A, Péter O, Baud D, Edouard S, Meylan P, Greub G. 2015. Evaluation of a new serological test for the detection of anti-Coxiella and anti-Rickettsia antibodies. Microbes Infect 17:811–816. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2015.09.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 349.Mallavia LP, Whiting LL, Minnick MF, Heinzen R, Reschke D, Foreman M, Baca OG, Frazier ME. 1990. Strategy for detection and differentiation of Coxiella burnetii strains using the polymerase chain reaction. Ann N Y Acad Sci 590:572–581. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb42268.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 350.Ibrahim A, Norlander L, Macellaro A, Sjöstedt A. 1997. Specific detection of Coxiella burnetii through partial amplification of 23S rDNA. Eur J Epidemiol 13:329–334. doi: 10.1023/A:1007385104687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 351.Vaidya VM, Malik SVS, Kaur S, Kumar S, Barbuddhe SB. 2008. Comparison of PCR, immunofluorescence assay, and pathogen isolation for diagnosis of Q fever in humans with spontaneous abortions. J Clin Microbiol 46:2038–2044. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01874-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 352.Stein A, Kruszewska D, Gouvernet J, Raoult D. 1997. Study of the 16S-23S ribosomal DNA internal spacer of Coxiella burnetii. Eur J Epidemiol 13:471–475. doi: 10.1023/A:1007389315808. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 353.Fenollar F, Fournier PE, Raoult D. 2004. Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii in the sera of patients with Q fever endocarditis or vascular infection. J Clin Microbiol 42:4919–4924. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.11.4919-4924.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 354.Fenollar F, Raoult D. 2004. Molecular genetic methods for the diagnosis of fastidious microorganisms. APMIS 112:785–807. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2004.apm11211-1206.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 355.Denison AM, Thompson HA, Massung RF. 2007. IS1111 insertion sequences of Coxiella burnetii: characterization and use for repetitive element PCR-based differentiation of Coxiella burnetii isolates. BMC Microbiol 7:91. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-7-91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 356.Klee SR, Tyczka J, Ellerbrok H, Franz T, Linke S, Baljer G, Appel B. 2006. Highly sensitive real-time PCR for specific detection and quantification of Coxiella burnetii. BMC Microbiol 6:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-6-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 357.Rolain J-M, Raoult D. 2005. Molecular detection of Coxiella burnetii in blood and sera during Q fever. QJM 98:615–617–620. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hci099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 358.Schneeberger PM, Hermans MHA, van Hannen EJ, Schellekens JJA, Leenders ACAP, Wever PC. 2010. Real-time PCR with serum samples is indispensable for early diagnosis of acute Q fever. Clin Vaccine Immunol 17:286–290. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00454-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 359.Wielders CCH, Wijnbergen PCA, Renders NHM, Schellekens JJA, Schneeberger PM, Wever PC, Hermans MHA. 2013. High Coxiella burnetii DNA load in serum during acute Q fever is associated with progression to a serologic profile indicative of chronic Q fever. J Clin Microbiol 51:3192–3198. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00993-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 360.Tilburg JJHC, Melchers WJG, Pettersson AM, Rossen JWA, Hermans MHA, van Hannen EJ, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, de Vries MC, Horrevorts AM, Klaassen CHW. 2010. Interlaboratory evaluation of different extraction and real-time PCR methods for detection of Coxiella burnetii DNA in serum. J Clin Microbiol 48:3923–3927. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01006-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 361.Jaton K, Peter O, Raoult D, Tissot J-D, Greub G. 2013. Development of a high throughput PCR to detect Coxiella burnetii and its application in a diagnostic laboratory over a 7-year period. New Microbes New Infect 1:6–12. doi: 10.1002/2052-2975.8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 362.Edouard S, Raoult D. 2016. Lyophilization to improve the sensitivity of qPCR for bacterial DNA detection in serum: the Q fever paradigm. J Med Microbiol 65:462–467. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.000253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 363.Gouriet F, Fenollar F, Patrice J-Y, Drancourt M, Raoult D. 2005. Use of shell-vial cell culture assay for isolation of bacteria from clinical specimens: 13 years of experience. J Clin Microbiol 43:4993–5002. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.4993-5002.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 364.Lockhart MG, Islam A, Fenwick SG, Graves SR, Stenos J. 2012. Comparative sensitivity of four different cell lines for the isolation of Coxiella burnetii. FEMS Microbiol Lett 334:75–78. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2012.02617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 365.Lee M, Jang JJ, Kim YS, Lee S-O, Choi S-H, Kim S-H, Yu E. 2012. Clinicopathologic features of Q fever patients with acute hepatitis. Korean J Pathol 46:10–14. doi: 10.4132/KoreanJPathol.2012.46.1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 366.Argov O, Weintraub M, Charach G. 2008. Doughnut” granulomas from erythema nodosum in acute Q fever. Isr Med Assoc J 10:241–242. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 367.Herndon G, Rogers HJ. 2013. Multiple “doughnut” granulomas in Coxiella burnetii infection (Q fever). Blood 122:3099. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-511063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 368.Kreisel F. 2007. Doughnut ring–shaped epithelioid granulomas in the bone marrow of a patient with Q fever. Int J Surg Pathol 15:172–173. doi: 10.1177/1066896906299074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 369.Silver SS, McLeish WA. 1984. “Doughnut” granulomas in Q fever. Can Med Assoc J 130:102–104. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 370.Lepidi H, Coulibaly B, Casalta J-P, Raoult D. 2006. Autoimmunohistochemistry: a new method for the histologic diagnosis of infective endocarditis. J Infect Dis 193:1711–1717. doi: 10.1086/504438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 371.Lepidi H, Fournier P-E, Karcher H, Schneider T, Raoult D. 2009. Immunohistochemical detection of Coxiella burnetii in an aortic graft. Clin Microbiol Infect 15(Suppl 2):S171–S172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 372.Lepidi H, Gouriet F, Raoult D. 2009. Immunohistochemical detection of Coxiella burnetii in chronic Q fever hepatitis. Clin Microbiol Infect 15(Suppl 2):S169–S170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 373.Malou N, Renvoise A, Nappez C, Raoult D. 2012. Immuno-PCR for the early serological diagnosis of acute infectious diseases: the Q fever paradigm. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 31:1951–1960. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1526-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 374.Derrick EH. 1983. “Q” fever, a new fever entity: clinical features, diagnosis and laboratory investigation. Rev Infect Dis 5:790–800. doi: 10.1093/clinids/5.4.790. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 375.Davis GE, Cox HR. 1938. Weekly reports for December 30, 1938. Public Health Rep 53:2259–2309. doi: 10.2307/4582746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 376.Cheney G, Geib WA. 1946. The identification of Q fever in Panama. Am J Epidemiol 44:158–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 377.Hornibrook JW, Nelson KR, Dyer RE, Topping NH, Bengtson IA. 1940. An institutional outbreak of pneumonitis. Public Health Rep 55:1936–1954. doi: 10.2307/4583489. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 378.Beck MD, Bell JA. 1949. Q fever studies in Southern California; an epidemiological study of 300 cases. Public Health Rep 64:41–56. doi: 10.2307/4586820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 379.Robbins FC, Ragan CA. 1946. Q fever in the Mediterranean area; report of its occurrence in Allied troops; clinical features of the disease. Am J Hyg 44:6–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 380.Marmion BP, Stoker MGP, Mccoy JH, Malloch RA, Moore B. 1953. Q fever in Great Britain; an analysis of 69 sporadic cases, with a study of the prevalence of infection in humans and cows. Lancet i:503–510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 381.Andrews PS, Marmion BP. 1959. Chronic Q fever. 2. Morbid anatomical and bacteriological findings in a patient with endocarditis. Br Med J 2:983–988. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 382.Powell OW, Stallman ND. 1962. The incidence and significance of phase 1 complement-fixing antibody in Q fever. J Hyg 60:359–364. doi: 10.1017/S0022172400020477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 383.Spicer AJ. 1979. Investigation of Coxiella burneti infection as a possible cause of chronic liver disease in man. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 73:415–417. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(79)90166-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 384.Robson AO, Shimmin CD. 1959. Chronic Q fever. I. Clinical aspects of a patient with endocarditis. Br Med J 2:980–983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 385.Turck WP, Howitt G, Turnberg LA, Fox H, Longson M, Matthews MB, Das Gupta R. 1976. Chronic Q fever. Q J Med 45:193–217. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 386.Anonymous. 1976. Chronic Q fever or Q fever endocarditis? Lancet i:1171–1172. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 387.Brown GL. 1973. Q fever. Br Med J 2:43–45. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.5857.43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 388.Tunstall Pedoe HD. 1970. Apparent recurrence of Q fever endocarditis following homograft replacement of aortic valve. Br Heart J 32:568–570. doi: 10.1136/hrt.32.4.568. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 389.Turck WP. 1978. Observations on Q fever endocarditis. Am Heart J 96:564–566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 390.Ellis ME, Smith CC, Moffat MA. 1983. Chronic or fatal Q-fever infection: a review of 16 patients seen in north-east Scotland (1967-80). Q J Med 52:54–66. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 391.Peacock MG, Philip RN, Williams JC, Faulkner RS. 1983. Serological evaluation of O fever in humans: enhanced phase I titers of immunoglobulins G and A are diagnostic for Q fever endocarditis. Infect Immun 41:1089–1098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 392.Dupuis G, Péter O, Lüthy R, Nicolet J, Peacock M, Burgdorfer W. 1986. Serological diagnosis of Q fever endocarditis. Eur Heart J 7:1062–1066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 393.Yebra M, Marazuela M, Albarrán F, Moreno A. 1988. Chronic Q fever hepatitis. Rev Infect Dis 10:1229–1230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 394.Brouqui P, Dupont HT, Drancourt M, Berland Y, Etienne J, Leport C, Goldstein F, Massip P, Micoud M, Bertrand A. 1993. Chronic Q fever. Ninety-two cases from France, including 27 cases without endocarditis. Arch Intern Med 153:642–648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 395.Atienza P, Ramond MJ, Degott C, Lebrec D, Rueff B, Benhamou JP. 1988. Chronic Q fever hepatitis complicated by extensive fibrosis. Gastroenterology 95:478–481. doi: 10.1016/0016-5085(88)90507-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 396.Raoult D, Levy PY, Harlé JR, Etienne J, Massip P, Goldstein F, Micoud M, Beytout J, Gallais H, Remy G. 1990. Chronic Q fever: diagnosis and follow-up. Ann N Y Acad Sci 590:51–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1990.tb42206.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 397.Rice PS, Kudesia G, McKendrick MW, Cullen DR. 1993. Coxiella burnetii serology in granulomatous hepatitis. J Infect 27:63–66. doi: 10.1016/0163-4453(93)93803-C. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 398.Weir WR, Bannister B, Chambers S, De Cock K, Mistry H. 1984. Chronic Q fever associated with granulomatous hepatitis. J Infect 8:56–60. doi: 10.1016/S0163-4453(84)93354-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 399.Galperin I, van Dijk JM. 2005. Chronic Q fever hepatitis. Isr Med Assoc J 7:529–530. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 400.Boattini M, Almeida A, Moura RB, Abreu J, Santos AS, Toscano Rico M. 2012. Chronic Q fever with no elevation of inflammatory markers: a case report. Case Rep Med 2012:249705. doi: 10.1155/2012/249705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 401.Fergusson RJ, Shaw TR, Kitchin AH, Matthews MB, Inglis JM, Peutherer JF. 1985. Subclinical chronic Q fever. Q J Med 57:669–676. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 402.Raoult D, Urvölgyi J, Etienne J, Roturier M, Puel J, Chaudet H. 1988. Diagnosis of endocarditis in acute Q-fever by immunofluorescence serology. Acta Virol 32:70–74. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 403.Fournier PE, Casalta JP, Habib G, Messana T, Raoult D. 1996. Modification of the diagnostic criteria proposed by the Duke endocarditis service to permit improved diagnosis of Q fever endocarditis. Am J Med 100:629–633. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(96)00040-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 404.Li JS, Sexton DJ, Mick N, Nettles R, Fowler VG, Ryan T, Bashore T, Corey GR. 2000. Proposed modifications to the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 30:633–638. doi: 10.1086/313753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 405.Raoult D, Piquet P, Gallais H, de Micco C, Drancourt M, Casanova P. 1986. Coxiella burnetii infection of a vascular prosthesis. N Engl J Med 315:1358–1359. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 406.van Loenhout JA, Paget WJ, Vercoulen JH, Wijkmans CJ, Hautvast JLA, van der Velden K. 2012. Assessing the long-term health impact of Q-fever in the Netherlands: a prospective cohort study started in 2007 on the largest documented Q-fever outbreak to date. BMC Infect Dis 12:280. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-280. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 407.van Loenhout JAF, Wielders CCH, Morroy G, Cox MJM, van der Hoek W, Hautvast JLA, Paget WJ, van der Velden J. 2015. Severely impaired health status of non-notified Q fever patients leads to an underestimation of the true burden of disease. Epidemiol Infect 143:2580–2587. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814003689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 408.van der Hoek W, Hogema BM, Dijkstra F, Rietveld A, Wijkmans CJ, Schneeberger PM, Zaaijer HL. 2012. Relation between Q fever notifications and Coxiella burnetii infections during the 2009 outbreak in The Netherlands. Euro Surveill 17(3):pii=20058 http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20058. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 409.Wegdam-Blans MCA, Kampschreur LM, Delsing CE, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Sprong T, van Kasteren MEE, Notermans DW, Renders NHM, Bijlmer HA, Lestrade PJ, Koopmans MPG, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Oosterheert JJ, Dutch Q Fever Consensus Group . 2012. Chronic Q fever: review of the literature and a proposal of new diagnostic criteria. J Infect 64:247–259. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2011.12.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 410.Raoult D. 2012. Chronic Q fever: expert opinion versus literature analysis and consensus. J Infect 65:102–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.04.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 411.Merhej V, Cammilleri S, Piquet P, Casalta J-P, Raoult D. 2012. Relevance of the positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of vascular graft infection with Coxiella burnetii. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis 35:45–49. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2011.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 412.Eldin C, Melenotte C, Million M, Cammilleri S, Sotto A, Elsendoorn A, Thuny F, Lepidi H, Roblot F, Weitten T, Assaad S, Bouaziz A, Chapuzet C, Gras G, Labussière S, Landais C, Longuet P, Masseau A, Mundler O, Raoult D. 2016. 18F-FDG PET/CT as a central tool in the shift from chronic Q fever to Coxiella burnetii persistent focalized infection. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e4287. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 413.Tissot-Dupont H, Vaillant V, Rey S, Raoult D. 2007. Role of sex, age, previous valve lesion, and pregnancy in the clinical expression and outcome of Q fever after a large outbreak. Clin Infect Dis 44:232–237. doi: 10.1086/510389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 414.Raoult D, Million M, Thuny F, Carrieri P. 2011. Chronic Q fever detection in the Netherlands. Clin Infect Dis 53:1170–1171. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 415.Million M, Thuny F, Richet H, Raoult D. 2010. Long-term outcome of Q fever endocarditis: a 26-year personal survey. Lancet Infect Dis 10:527–535. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70135-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 416.Million M, Thuny F, Bardin N, Angelakis E, Edouard S, Bessis S, Guimard T, Weitten T, Martin-Barbaz F, Texereau M, Ayouz K, Protopopescu C, Carrieri P, Habib G, Raoult D. 2016. Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome with valvular vegetations in acute Q fever. Clin Infect Dis 62:537–544. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ956. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 417.Botelho-Nevers E, Fournier P-E, Richet H, Fenollar F, Lepidi H, Foucault C, Branchereau A, Piquet P, Maurin M, Raoult D. 2007. Coxiella burnetii infection of aortic aneurysms or vascular grafts: report of 30 new cases and evaluation of outcome. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 26:635–640. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0357-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 418.Eldin C, Mailhe M, Lions C, Carrieri P, Safi H, Brouqui P, Raoult D. 2016. Treatment and prophylactic strategy for Coxiella burnetii infection of aneurysms and vascular grafts: a retrospective cohort study. Medicine (Baltimore) 95:e2810. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 419.Angelakis E, Edouard S, Lafranchi M-A, Pham T, Lafforgue P, Raoult D. 2014. Emergence of Q fever arthritis in France. J Clin Microbiol 52:1064–1067. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03371-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 420.Million M, Bellevegue L, Labussiere A-S, Dekel M, Ferry T, Deroche P, Socolovschi C, Cammilleri S, Raoult D. 2014. Culture-negative prosthetic joint arthritis related to Coxiella burnetii. Am J Med 127:786.e7–786.e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 421.Kampschreur LM, Wegdam-Blans MCA, Wever PC, Renders NHM, Delsing CE, Sprong T, van Kasteren MEE, Bijlmer H, Notermans D, Oosterheert JJ, Stals FS, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Dutch Q Fever Consensus Group . 2015. Chronic Q fever diagnosis—consensus guideline versus expert opinion. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1183–1188. doi: 10.3201/eid2107.130955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 422.Edouard S, Million M, Royer G, Giorgi R, Grisoli D, Raoult D. 2014. Reduction in incidence of Q fever endocarditis: 27 years of experience of a national reference center. J Infect 68:141–148. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2013.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 423.Limonard GJM, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Weers-Pothoff G, Wijkmans C, Besselink R, Horrevorts AM, Schneeberger PM, Groot CAR. 2010. One-year follow-up of patients of the ongoing Dutch Q fever outbreak: clinical, serological and echocardiographic findings. Infection 38:471–477. doi: 10.1007/s15010-010-0052-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 424.Million M, Raoult D. 2014. Reply to Kampschreur et al. Clin Infect Dis 58:447–448. doi: 10.1093/cid/cit720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 425.Keijmel SP, Krijger E, Delsing CE, Sprong T, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Bleeker-Rovers CP. 2015. Differentiation of acute Q fever from other infections in patients presenting to hospitals, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1348–1356. doi: 10.3201/eid2108.140196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 426.van der Hoek W, Versteeg B, Meekelenkamp JCE, Renders NHM, Leenders ACAP, Weers-Pothoff I, Hermans MHA, Zaaijer HL, Wever PC, Schneeberger PM. 2011. Follow-up of 686 patients with acute Q fever and detection of chronic infection. Clin Infect Dis 52:1431–1436. doi: 10.1093/cid/cir234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 427.Stein A, Raoult D. 1998. Q fever during pregnancy: a public health problem in southern France. Clin Infect Dis 27:592–596. doi: 10.1086/514698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 428.Carcopino X, Raoult D, Bretelle F, Boubli L, Stein A. 2009. Q fever during pregnancy: a cause of poor fetal and maternal outcome. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1166:79–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04519.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 429.Nielsen SY, Hjøllund NH, Andersen A-MN, Henriksen TB, Kantsø B, Krogfelt KA, Mølbak K. 2012. Presence of antibodies against Coxiella burnetii and risk of spontaneous abortion: a nested case-control study. PLoS One 7:e31909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 430.Nielsen SY, Andersen A-MN, Mølbak K, Hjøllund NH, Kantsø B, Krogfelt KA, Henriksen TB. 2013. No excess risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes among women with serological markers of previous infection with Coxiella burnetii: evidence from the Danish National Birth Cohort. BMC Infect Dis 13:87. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 431.Munster JM, Leenders AC, Hamilton CJ, Meekelenkamp JC, Schneeberger PM, van der Hoek W, Rietveld A, de Vries E, Stolk RP, Aarnoudse JG, Hak E. 2013. Routine screening for Coxiella burnetii infection during pregnancy: a clustered randomised controlled trial during an outbreak, the Netherlands, 2010. Euro Surveill 18(24):pii:20504. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 432.Leshem E. 2012. Screening for Coxiella burnetii infection during pregnancy: pros and cons according to the Wilson and Jungner criteria. Euro Surveill 17(3):20061. (Letter.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 433.Raoult D, Marrie T, Mege J. 2005. Natural history and pathophysiology of Q fever. Lancet Infect Dis 5:219–226. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70052-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 434.Eldin C, Raoult D. 2016. Moving from Q fever to C. burnetii infection. Epidemiol Infect 144:1163–1164. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815002976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 435.Wagner-Wiening C, Brockmann S, Kimmig P. 2006. Serological diagnosis and follow-up of asymptomatic and acute Q fever infections. Int J Med Microbiol 296(Suppl 40):S294–S296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 436.Boschini A, Perri GD, Legnani D, Fabbri P, Ballarini P, Zucconi R, Boros S, Rezza G. 1999. Consecutive epidemics of Q fever in a residential facility for drug abusers: impact on persons with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 28:866–872. doi: 10.1086/515192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 437.Raoult D, Levy PY, Dupont HT, Chicheportiche C, Tamalet C, Gastaut JA, Salducci J. 1993. Q fever and HIV infection. AIDS 7:81–86. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199301000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 438.Montes M, Cilla G, Marimon JM, Diaz de Tuesta JL, Perez-Trallero E. 1995. Coxiella burnetii infection in subjects with HIV infection and HIV infection in patients with Q fever. Scand J Infect Dis 27:344–346. doi: 10.3109/00365549509032728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 439.Bélec L, Grésenguet G, Ekala MT, Jacob A, Vohito MD, Cotigny S, Payan C. 1993. Coxiella burnetii infection among subjects infected with HIV type 1 in the Central African Republic. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 12:775–778. doi: 10.1007/BF02098468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 440.Lamas CC, Rozental T, Bóia MN, Favacho ARM, Kirsten AH, da Silva APM, de Lemos ERS. 2009. Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii antibodies in human immunodeficiency virus-positive patients in Jacarepaguá, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Clin Microbiol Infect 15(Suppl 2):S140–S141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 441.Schoffelen T, Kampschreur LM, van Roeden SE, Wever PC, den Broeder AA, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Sprong T, Joosten LA, van Riel BPLCM, Oosterheert JJ, van Deuren M, Creemers MCW. 2014. Coxiella burnetii infection (Q fever) in rheumatoid arthritis patients with and without anti-TNFα therapy. Ann Rheum Dis 73:1436–1438. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 442.Luoto L, Casey ML, Pickens EG. 1965. Q fever studies in Montana. Detection of asymptomatic infection among residents of infected dairy premises. Am J Epidemiol 81:356–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 443.Dupuis G, Petite J, Péter O, Vouilloz M. 1987. An important outbreak of human Q fever in a Swiss Alpine valley. Int J Epidemiol 16:282–287. doi: 10.1093/ije/16.2.282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 444.Bacci S, Villumsen S, Valentiner-Branth P, Smith B, Krogfelt KA, Mølbak K. 2012. Epidemiology and clinical features of human infection with Coxiella burnetii in Denmark during 2006-07. Zoonoses Public Health 59:61–68. doi: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2011.01419.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 445.Hogema BM, Slot E, Molier M, Schneeberger PM, Hermans MH, van Hannen EJ, van der Hoek W, Cuijpers HT, Zaaijer HL. 2012. Coxiella burnetii infection among blood donors during the 2009 Q-fever outbreak in The Netherlands. Transfusion (Paris) 52:144–150. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03250.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 446.Marrie TJ. 2010. Q fever pneumonia. Infect Dis Clin North Am 24:27–41. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2009.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 447.Marrie TJ, Campbell N, McNeil SA, Webster D, Hatchette TF. 2008. Q fever update, Maritime Canada. Emerg Infect Dis 14:67–69. doi: 10.3201/eid1401.071256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 448.Sobradillo V, Ansola P, Baranda F, Corral C. 1989. Q fever pneumonia: a review of 164 community-acquired cases in the Basque country. Eur Respir J 2:263–266. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 449.Luksić B, Punda-Polić V, Ivić I, Bradarić I, Bradarić N. 2006. Clinical and epidemiological features of hospitalized acute Q fever cases from Split-Dalmatia County (Croatia), 1985-2002. Med Sci Monit 12:CR126–CR131. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 450.Vanderburg S, Rubach MP, Halliday JEB, Cleaveland S, Reddy EA, Crump JA. 2014. Epidemiology of Coxiella burnetii infection in Africa: a OneHealth systematic review. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 8:e2787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0002787. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 451.Koulla-Shiro S, Kuaban C, Belec L. 1996. Acute community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected and non-HIV-infected adult patients in Cameroon: aetiology and outcome. Tuber Lung Dis 77:47–51. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8479(96)90075-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 452.Wielders CCH, Wuister AMH, de Visser VL, de Jager-Leclercq MG, Groot CAR, Dijkstra F, van Gageldonk-Lafeber AB, van Leuken JPG, Wever PC, van der Hoek W, Schneeberger PM. 2014. Characteristics of hospitalized acute Q fever patients during a large epidemic, The Netherlands. PLoS One 9:e91764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 453.Ergas D, Keysari A, Edelstein V, Sthoeger ZM. 2006. Acute Q fever in Israel: clinical and laboratory study of 100 hospitalized patients. Isr Med Assoc J 8:337–341. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 454.Lai C-H, Chang L-L, Lin J-N, Chen W-F, Wei Y-F, Chiu C-T, Wu J-T, Hsu C-K, Chen J-Y, Lee H-S, Lin H-H, Chen Y-H. 2014. Clinical characteristics of Q fever and etiology of community-acquired pneumonia in a tropical region of southern Taiwan: a prospective observational study. PLoS One 9:e102808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102808. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 455.Kofteridis DP, Mazokopakis EE, Tselentis Y, Gikas A. 2004. Neurological complications of acute Q fever infection. Eur J Epidemiol 19:1051–1054. doi: 10.1007/s10654-004-0108-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 456.Okimoto N, Asaoka N, Osaki K, Kurihara T, Yamato K, Sunagawa T, Fujita K, Ohba H, Nakamura J, Nakada K. 2004. Clinical features of Q fever pneumonia. Respirol Carlton Vic 9:278–282. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2004.00586.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 457.Zhang Y, Zang G-Q, Tang Z-H, Yu Y-S. 2015. The halo sign of Q fever pneumonia. Braz J Infect Dis 19:220–221. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2014.11.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 458.Voloudaki AE, Kofteridis DP, Tritou IN, Gourtsoyiannis NC, Tselentis YJ, Gikas AI. 2000. Q fever pneumonia: CT findings. Radiology 215:880–883. doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.3.r00jn21880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 459.Palmela C, Badura R, Valadas E. 2012. Acute Q fever in Portugal. Epidemiological and clinical features of 32 hospitalized patients. Germs 2:43–59. doi: 10.11599/germs.2012.1013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 460.Marrie TJ. 2004. Q fever pneumonia. Curr Opin Infect Dis 17:137–142. doi: 10.1097/00001432-200404000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 461.Janigan DT, Marrie TJ. 1983. An inflammatory pseudotumor of the lung in Q fever pneumonia. N Engl J Med 308:86–88. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198301133080207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 462.Lipton JH, Fong TC, Gill MJ, Burgess K, Elliott PD. 1987. Q fever inflammatory pseudotumor of the lung. Chest 92:756–757. doi: 10.1378/chest.92.4.756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 463.Kampschreur LM, Wegdam-Blans MCA, Thijsen SFT, Groot CA, Schneeberger RPM, Hollander AA, Schijen MJJHEM, Arents NLA, Oosterheert JJ, Wever PC. 2010. Acute Q fever related in-hospital mortality in the Netherlands. Neth J Med 68:408–413. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 464.Espejo E, Gil-Díaz A, Oteo JA, Castillo-Rueda R, García-Alvarez L, Santana-Báez S, Bella F. 2014. Clinical presentation of acute Q fever in Spain: seasonal and geographical differences. Int J Infect Dis 26:162–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.06.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 465.Chang K, Yan J-J, Lee H-C, Liu KH, Lee NY, Ko W-C. 2004. Acute hepatitis with or without jaundice: a predominant presentation of acute Q fever in southern Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect 37:103–108. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 466.Alkan WJ, Evenchik Z, Eshchar J. 1965. Q fever and infectious hepatitis. Am J Med 38:54–61. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(65)90159-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 467.Bishara J. 2005. More Q's than A's in chronic Q fever hepatitis. Isr Med Assoc J 7:527–528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 468.Lai C-H, Chin C, Chung H-C, Huang C-K, Chen W-F, Yang Y-T, Chen W, Lin H-H. 2007. Acute Q fever hepatitis in patients with and without underlying hepatitis B or C virus infection. Clin Infect Dis 45:e52–59. doi: 10.1086/520680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 469.Dugdale C, Chow B, Yakirevich E, Kojic E, Knoll B. 2014. Prolonged pyrexia and hepatitis: Q fever. Am J Med 127:928–930. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2014.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 470.Oh M, Baek S, Lee S-O, Yu E, Ryu J-S. 2012. A case of acute Q fever hepatitis diagnosed by F-18 FDG PET/CT. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 46:125–128. doi: 10.1007/s13139-012-0130-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 471.Berkovitch M, Aladjem M, Beer S, Cohar K. 1985. A fatal case of Q fever hepatitis in a child. Helv Paediatr Acta 40:87–91. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 472.Isaksson HJ, Hrafnkelsson J, Hilmarsdóttir I. 2001. Acute Q fever: a cause of fatal hepatitis in an Icelandic traveller. Scand J Infect Dis 33:314–315. doi: 10.1080/003655401300077441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 473.Lin P-H, Lo Y-C, Chiang F-T, Wang J-L, Jeng Y-M, Fang C-T, Chang S-C. 2008. Acute Q fever presenting as fever of unknown origin with rapidly progressive hepatic failure in a patient with alcoholism. J Formos Med Assoc 107:896–901. doi: 10.1016/S0929-6646(08)60207-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 474.Raoult D, Tissot-Dupont H, Foucault C, Gouvernet J, Fournier PE, Bernit E, Stein A, Nesri M, Harle JR, Weiller PJ. 2000. Q fever 1985-1998. Clinical and epidemiologic features of 1,383 infections. Medicine (Baltimore) 79:109–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 475.Ohguchi H, Hirabayashi Y, Kodera T, Ishii T, Munakata Y, Sasaki T. 2006. Q fever with clinical features resembling systemic lupus erythematosus. Intern Med Tokyo Jpn 45:323–326. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.45.1382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 476.Levy P-Y, Khan M, Raoult D. 2005. Acute pericarditis. N Engl J Med 352:1154–1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 477.Levy PY, Gouriet F, Habib G, Bonnet JL, Raoult D. 2009. Diagnosis of Coxiella burnetii pericarditis by using a systematic prescription kit in cases of pericardial effusion: an 8-year experience. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:173–175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 478.Levy PY, Carrieri P, Raoult D. 1999. Coxiella burnetii pericarditis: report of 15 cases and review. Clin Infect Dis 29:393–397. doi: 10.1086/520221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 479.Bautista-Hernández V, Gutierrez F, Ray VG, Arribas JM, García-Puente J, Casinello N, Arcas R. 2004. Constrictive pericarditis due to Coxiella burnetii. Ann Thorac Surg 78:326–328. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4975(03)01361-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 480.Carrascosa MF, Pascual Velasco F, Gómez Izquierdo R, Salcines-Caviedes JR, Gómez Amigo V, Canga-Villegas AM. 2012. Acute Q fever myocarditis: thinking about a life-threatening but potentially curable condition. Int J Cardiol 158:e17–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.10.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 481.Vogiatzis I, Dimoglou G, Sachpekidis V. 2008. Q fever myocarditis. Hippokratia 12:46–49. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 482.Fournier PE, Etienne J, Harle JR, Habib G, Raoult D. 2001. Myocarditis, a rare but severe manifestation of Q fever: report of 8 cases and review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 32:1440–1447. doi: 10.1086/320159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 483.Chevalier P, Vandenesch F, Brouqui P, Kirkorian G, Tabib A, Etienne J, Raoult D, Loire R, Touboul P. 1997. Fulminant myocardial failure in a previously healthy young man. Circulation 95:1654–1657. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.95.6.1654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 484.Sheridan P, MacCaig JN, Hart RJ. 1974. Myocarditis complicating Q fever. Br Med J 2:155–156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 485.Hervás JA, de la Fuente MA, García F, Reynés J, de Carlos JC, Salvá F. 2000. Coxiella burnetii myopericarditis and rhabdomyolysis in a child. Pediatr Infect Dis J 19:1104–1106. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200011000-00019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 486.Figueiredo C, Candeias F, Brito MJ. 2016. Aseptic meningitis caused by Coxiella burnetii. Pediatr Infect Dis J 35:115. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000935. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 487.Khateeb R, Gandhi T, Dhaliwal G. 2013. A raw deal. J Hosp Med 8:464–467. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 488.Skiba V, Barner KC. 2009. Central nervous system manifestations of Q fever responsive to steroids. Mil Med 174:857–859. doi: 10.7205/MILMED-D-03-7108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 489.Ferrante MA, Dolan MJ. 1993. Q fever meningoencephalitis in a soldier returning from the Persian Gulf War. Clin Infect Dis 16:489–496. doi: 10.1093/clind/16.4.489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 490.Rustscheff S. 2005. Q fever as a cause of pure sensory polyneuropathy—the six-year itch: a follow-up of an indigenous Swedish case. Scand J Infect Dis 37:949–950. doi: 10.1080/00365540500263102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 491.Bernit E, Pouget J, Janbon F, et al. . 2002. Neurological involvement in acute Q fever: a report of 29 cases and review of the literature. Arch Intern Med 162:693–700. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.6.693. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 492.Navarro J, Martinez ML, Iniesta JA, Palazon D, Cano A, Paulino J. 2001. A case of Q fever manifested solely as meningoencephalitis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 20:361–362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 493.Schattner A, Kushnir M, Zhornicky T, Fenakel G. 1993. Lymphocytic meningitis as the sole manifestation of Q fever. Postgrad Med J 69:636–637. doi: 10.1136/pgmj.69.814.636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 494.Guerrero M, Gutierrez J, Carnero C, Gonzalez-Maldonado R, Maroto C. 1993. Acute meningoencephalitis as the sole manifestation of Q fever. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 12:35–37. doi: 10.1007/BF01997054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 495.Drancourt M, Raoult D, Xeridat B, Milandre L, Nesri M, Dano P. 1991. Q fever meningoencephalitis in five patients. Eur J Epidemiol 7:134–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 496.Shaked Y, Samra Y. 1989. Q fever meningoencephalitis associated with bilateral abducens nerve paralysis, bilateral optic neuritis and abnormal cerebrospinal fluid findings. Infection 17:394–395. doi: 10.1007/BF01645555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 497.Marrie TJ. 1985. Pneumonia and meningo-encephalitis due to Coxiella burnetii. J Infect 11:59–61. doi: 10.1016/S0163-4453(85)91066-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 498.de Alarcón A, Villanueva JL, Viciana P, López-Cortés L, Torronteras R, Bernabeu M, Cordero E, Pachón J. 2003. Q fever: epidemiology, clinical features and prognosis. A study from 1983 to 1999 in the South of Spain. J Infect 47:110–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 499.Galache C, Santos-Juanes J, Blanco S, Rodríguez E, Martínez A, Soto J. 2004. Q fever: a new cause of “doughnut” granulomatous lobular panniculitis. Br J Dermatol 151:685–687. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06125.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 500.Conget I, Mallolas J, Mensa J, Rovira M. 1987. Erythema nodosum and Q fever. Arch Dermatol 123:867. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 501.Vázquez-López F, Rippe ML, Soler T, Rodríguez A, Arribas JM, Pérez-Oliva N. 1997. Erythema nodosum and acute Q fever: report of a case with granulomatous hepatitis and immunological abnormalities. Acta Derm Venereol 77:73–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 502.Ende N, Gelpi AP. 1957. Pathological changes noted in bone marrow in a case of Q fever. Arch Intern Med 100:793–796. doi: 10.1001/archinte.1957.00260110109015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 503.Delsol G, Pellegrin M, Familiades J, Auvergnat JC. 1978. Bone marrow lesions in Q fever. Blood 52:637–638. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 504.Okun DB, Sun NC, Tanaka KR. 1979. Bone marrow granulomas in Q fever. Am J Clin Pathol 71:117–121. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/71.1.117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 505.Voigt JJ, Delsol G, Fabre J. 1983. Liver and bone marrow granulomas in Q fever. Gastroenterology 84:887–888. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 506.Travis LB, Travis WD, Li CY, Pierre RV. 1986. Q fever. A clinicopathologic study of five cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 110:1017–1020. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 507.Brouqui P, Raoult D, Gabriel B. 1992. Chronic coxiella burnetii infection mimicking malignant hematologic disease. Am J Hematol 39:309–309. (Letter.) doi: 10.1002/ajh.2830390415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 508.Bottieau E, De Raeve H, Colebunders R, Van den Ende J, Vervoort T, Van Marck E. 2000. Q fever after a journey in Syria: a diagnosis suggested by bone marrow biopsy. Acta Clin Belg 55:30–33. doi: 10.1080/17843286.2000.11754269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 509.Brada M, Bellingham AJ. 1980. Bone-marrow necrosis and Q fever. Br Med J 281:1108–1109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 510.Estrov Z, Bruck R, Shtalrid M, Berrebi A, Resnitzky P. 1984. Histiocytic hemophagocytosis in Q fever. Arch Pathol Lab Med 108:7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 511.Harris P, Dixit R, Norton R. 2011. Coxiella burnetii causing haemophagocytic syndrome: a rare complication of an unusual pathogen. Infection 39:579–582. doi: 10.1007/s15010-011-0142-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 512.Chen T-C, Chang K, Lu P-L, Liu Y-C, Chen Y-H, Hsieh H-C, Yang W-C, Lin W-R, Tsai J-J, Lin S-F. 2006. Acute Q fever with hemophagocytic syndrome: case report and literature review. Scand J Infect Dis 38:1119–1122. doi: 10.1080/00365540600684405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 513.Hufnagel M, Niemeyer C, Zimmerhackl LB, Tüchelmann T, Sauter S, Brandis M. 1995. Hemophagocytosis: a complication of acute Q fever in a child. Clin Infect Dis 21:1029–1031. doi: 10.1093/clinids/21.4.1029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 514.Paine A, Miya T, Webb BJ. 2015. Coxiella burnetii infection with severe hyperferritinemia in an asplenic patient. Open Forum Infect Dis 2:ofv125. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 515.Alwis L, Balan K, Wright P, Lever A, Carmichael A. 2009. Bone marrow involvement in Q fever—detection by fluorine-18-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose PET. Lancet Infect Dis 9:718. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(09)70113-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 516.Ariga T, Nagaoka H, Miyanoshita A, Kusunoki Y, Watanabe T, Shinohara T, Sakiyama Y. 2000. Coxiella burnetii lymphadenitis: a possible fever focus in acute Q fever. Pediatr Int 42:711–714. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-200x.2000.01290.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 517.Tattevin P, Arvieux C, Dupont M, Guggenbuhl P, Lemeur A, Michelet C. 2003. Granulomatous lymphadenitis as a manifestation of Q fever. Emerg Infect Dis 9:137–138. doi: 10.3201/eid0901.020211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 518.Foucault C, Lepidi H, Poujet-Abadie JF, Granel B, Roblot F, Ariga T, Raoult D. 2004. Q fever and lymphadenopathy: report of four new cases and review. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 23:759–764. doi: 10.1007/s10096-004-1211-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 519.Takanami K, Kaneta T, Tamada T, Yamada T, Higano S, Yamada S, Fukuda H, Takahashi S. 2008. Q fever with lymphadenopathy on F-18 FDG PET. Clin Nucl Med 33:436–437. doi: 10.1097/RLU.0b013e318170d52e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 520.Rolain J-M, Lepidi H, Zanaret M, Triglia J-M, Michel G, Thomas P-A, Texereau M, Stein A, Romaru A, Eb F, Raoult D. 2006. Lymph node biopsy specimens and diagnosis of cat-scratch disease. Emerg Infect Dis 12:1338–1344. doi: 10.3201/eid1209.060122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 521.Ramos HS, Hodges RE, Meroney WH. 1957. Q fever: report of a case simulating lymphoma. Ann Intern Med 47:1030–1035. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-47-5-1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 522.Newcombe JP, Gray PEA, Palasanthiran P, Snelling TL. 2013. Q fever with transient antiphospholipid antibodies associated with cholecystitis and splenic infarction. Pediatr Infect Dis J 32:415–416. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182843d7e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 523.Lee C-H, Chuah S-K, Pei S-N, Liu J-W. 2011. Acute Q fever presenting as antiphospholipid syndrome, pneumonia, and acalculous cholecystitis and masquerading as Mycoplasma pneumoniae and hepatitis C viral infections. Jpn J Infect Dis 64:525–527. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 524.Figtree M, Miyakis S, Stenos J, Graves S, Botham S, Ferson M, Krilis S. 2010. Q fever cholecystitis in an unvaccinated butcher diagnosed by gallbladder polymerase chain reaction. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 10:421–423. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2008.0209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 525.Ergas D, Abdul-Hai A, Sthoeger ZM. 2008. Acalculous cholecystitis: an unusual presentation of acute Q fever masquerading as infectious endocarditis. Am J Med Sci 336:356–357. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31815bf9f9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 526.Reina-Serrano S, Jiménez-Sáenz M, Herrerías-Gutiérrez JM, Venero-Gómez J. 2005. Q fever-related cholecystitis: a missed entity? Lancet Infect Dis 5:734–735. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70274-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 527.Rolain JM, Lepidi H, Harlé JR, Allegre T, Dorval ED, Khayat Z, Raoult D. 2003. Acute acalculous cholecystitis associated with Q fever: report of seven cases and review of the literature. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 22:222–227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 528.Garcia-Zamalloa A, Gurruchaga N, Montes M. 2000. Q fever and antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Am J Med 108:687–688. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00401-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 529.Ordi-Ros J, Selva-O'Callaghan A, Monegal-Ferran F, Monasterio-Aspiri Y, Juste-Sanchez C, Vilardell-Tarres M. 1994. Prevalence, significance, and specificity of antibodies to phospholipids in Q fever. Clin Infect Dis 18:213–218. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.2.213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 530.Wong RC, Wilson R, Silcock R, Kratzing LM, Looke D. 2001. Unusual combination of positive IgG autoantibodies in acute Q-fever infection. Intern Med J 31:432–435. doi: 10.1046/j.1445-5994.2001.00099.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 531.Lefebvre M, Grossi O, Agard C, Perret C, Le Pape P, Raoult D, Hamidou MA. 2010. Systemic immune presentations of Coxiella burnetii infection (Q fever). Semin Arthritis Rheum 39:405–409. doi: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2008.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 532.Hernández Beriain JÁ Machín García S, Novoa Medina FJ, Batista Perdomo D, Rosas Romero A, Girona Quesada E. 2012. Q-fever can simulate a lupus flare. Reumatol Clin 8:143–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 533.Kayser K, Wiebel M, Schulz V, Gabius HJ. 1995. Necrotizing bronchitis, angiitis, and amyloidosis associated with chronic Q fever. Respir Int Rev Thorac Dis 62:114–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 534.Rafailidis PI, Dourakis SP, Fourlas CA. 2006. Q fever endocarditis masquerading as mixed cryoglobulinemia type II. A case report and review of the literature. BMC Infect Dis 6:32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 535.Kaplanski G, Granel B, Vaz T, Durand JM. 1998. Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction complicating the treatment of chronic Q fever endocarditis: elevated TNFalpha and IL-6 serum levels. J Infect 37:83–84. doi: 10.1016/S0163-4453(98)91120-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 536.Aloizos S, Gourgiotis S, Oikonomou K, Stakia P. 2008. Recurrent Jarisch-Herxheimer reaction in a patient with Q fever pneumonia: a case report. Cases J 1:360. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-1-360. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 537.Maor Y, Sternik L, Orlov B, Rahav G, Keller N, Raanani E, Kogan A. 2016. Coxiella burnetii endocarditis and aortic vascular graft infection: an underrecognized disease. Ann Thorac Surg 101:141–145. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.06.075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 538.Watt G, Pachirat O, Baggett HC, Maloney SA, Lulitanond V, Raoult D, Bhengsri S, Thamthitiwat S, Paupairoj A, Kosoy M, Ud-Ai N, Sukwicha W, Whistler T, Fournier P-E. 2014. Infective endocarditis in northeastern Thailand. Emerg Infect Dis 20:473–476. doi: 10.3201/eid2003.131059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 539.Fenollar F, Fournier PE, Carrieri MP, Habib G, Messana T, Raoult D. 2001. Risks factors and prevention of Q fever endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 33:312–316. doi: 10.1086/321889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 540.Fenollar F, Thuny F, Xeridat B, Lepidi H, Raoult D. 2006. Endocarditis after acute Q fever in patients with previously undiagnosed valvulopathies. Clin Infect Dis 42:818–821. doi: 10.1086/500402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 541.Lamas CC, Eykyn SJ. 2000. Bicuspid aortic valve—a silent danger: analysis of 50 cases of infective endocarditis. Clin Infect Dis 30:336–341. doi: 10.1086/313646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 542.Oteo JA, Pérez-Cortés S, Santibáñez P, Gutiérrez E, Portillo A, Blanco JR, de Alarcón A. 2012. Q fever endocarditis associated with a cardiovascular implantable electronic device. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:E482–E484. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03992.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 543.Fernández-Ruiz M, López-Medrano F, Alonso-Navas F, Aguado JM. 2010. Coxiella burnetii infection of left atrial thrombus mimicking an atrial myxoma. Int J Infect Dis 14(Suppl 3):e319–e321. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2010.02.2259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 544.Antonopoulos C, Karagianni M, Galanakis N, Vagianos C. 2010. Mycotic splenic artery aneurysm secondary to Coxiella burnetii endocarditis. Ann Vasc Surg 24:416.e13–16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 545.Tyler R, Povey H, Pai S, Sudarshan C. 2015. Delayed diagnosis of Q fever: finally diagnosed after elective cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 100:325–326. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.08.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 546.Mora-Rillo M, Martín-Suñé N, Romero-Gómez MP, Fernández-Capitán MC. 2013. Polymicrobial endocarditis: chronic Q fever and Enterococcus faecalis coinfection. Rev Clín Espanõ 213:172–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 547.Yahav D, Kuznitz I, Reisfeld S, Eliakim-Raz N, Bishara J. 2015. Polymicrobial Q fever and enterococcal aortic prosthetic valve endocarditis with aortic root abscess. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 15:326–328. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2015.1777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 548.Rovery C, Granel B, Casalta J-P, Lepidi H, Habib G, Raoult D. 2009. Coinfection with Coxiella burnetii in infectious endocarditis. Clin Microbiol Infect 15(Suppl 2):S190–S191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 549.Grisoli D, Million M, Edouard S, Thuny F, Lepidi H, Collart F, Habib G, Raoult D. 2014. Latent Q fever endocarditis in patients undergoing routine valve surgery. J Heart Valve Dis 23:735–743. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 550.Kampschreur LM, Hoornenborg E, Renders NHM, Oosterheert JJ, Haverman JF, Elsman P, Wever PC. 2013. Delayed diagnosis of chronic Q fever and cardiac valve surgery. Emerg Infect Dis 19:768–773. doi: 10.3201/eid1905.120353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 551.Barten DG, Delsing CE, Keijmel SP, Sprong T, Timmermans J, Oyen WJ, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Bleeker-Rovers CP. 2013. Localizing chronic Q fever: a challenging query. BMC Infect Dis 13:413. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 552.Chieng D, Janssen J, Benson S, Passage J, Lenzo N. 2016. 18-FDG PET/ CT scan in the diagnosis and follow-up of chronic Q fever aortic valve endocarditis. Heart Lung Circ 25:e17–20. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2015.09.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 553.Simon L, De Martino S, Garnon J, Imperiale A, Argemi X, Raoult D, Hansmann Y. 2015. Positron emission tomography to diagnose chronic Q fever. Med Mal Infect 45:420–422. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2015.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 554.Cunha BA, Wolfe LA, Gran A, Paruchuri V, Gubernikoff G. 2013. Bright spots: Q fever prosthetic valve endocarditis. Am J Med 126:1057–1058. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 555.Melenotte C, Million M, Hartung O, Botelho-Nevers E, Claudel M, Craighero F, Brouqui P, Raoult D. 2012. Query rectal bleeding. Lancet 380:446. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60470-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 556.Wegdam-Blans MCA, ter Woorst JF, Klompenhouwer EG, Teijink JA. 2012. David procedure during a reoperation for ongoing chronic Q fever infection of an ascending aortic prosthesis. Eur J Cardio-Thorac Surg 42:e19–e20. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 557.Wegdam-Blans MCA, Vainas T, van Sambeek MR, Cuypers PW, Tjhie HTJ, van Straten AHM, Teijink JA. 2011. Vascular complications of Q-fever infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 42:384–392. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.04.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 558.Mejia A, Toursarkissian B, Hagino RT, Myers JG, Sykes MT. 2000. Primary aortoduodenal fistula and Q fever: an underrecognized association? Ann Vasc Surg 14:271–273. doi: 10.1007/s100169910046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 559.Senn L, Franciolli M, Raoult D, Moulin A, Von Segesser L, Calandra T, Greub G. 2005. Coxiella burnetii vascular graft infection. BMC Infect Dis 5:109. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-5-109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 560.González-Del Vecchio M, Vena A, Valerio M, Marin M, Verde E, Muñóz P, Bouza E. 2014. Coxiella burnetii infection in hemodialysis and other vascular grafts. Medicine (Baltimore) 93:364–371. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 561.Bisharat N, Minuhin I. 2012. Prosthetic vascular graft infections between blood and concordance of graft culture pathogen. Am J Med Sci 344:431–435. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3182442eb3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 562.Hagenaars JCJP, Wever PC, van Petersen AS, Lestrade PJ, de Jager-Leclercq MGL, Hermans MHA, Moll FL, Koning OHJ, Renders NHM. 2014. Estimated prevalence of chronic Q fever among Coxiella burnetii seropositive patients with an abdominal aortic/iliac aneurysm or aorto-iliac reconstruction after a large Dutch Q fever outbreak. J Infect 69:154–160. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.03.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 563.Hagenaars JCJP, Wever PC, Shamelian SOA, VAN Petersen AS, Hilbink M, Renders NHM, Jager-Leclercq DEGL, Moll FL, Koning OHJ. 2015. Vascular chronic Q fever: quality of life. Epidemiol Infect 143:2903–2909. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814003951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 564.Hagenaars JCJP, Koning OHJ, van den Haak RFF, Verhoeven BAN, Renders NHM, Hermans MHA, Wever PC, van Suylen RJ. 2014. Histological characteristics of the abdominal aortic wall in patients with vascular chronic Q fever. Int J Exp Pathol 95:282–289. doi: 10.1111/iep.12086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 565.O'Donnell ME, Manshani N, McCaughey C, Soong C, Lee B. 2007. Coxiella burnetii infection of an aortic graft with multiple vertebral body erosion. J Vasc Surg 45:399–403. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 566.Edouard S, Labussiere A-S, Guimard Y, Fournier P-E, Raoult D. 2010. Q fever: a case with a vascular infection complication. BMJ Case Rep 2010:bcr0120102690. doi: 10.1136/bcr.01.2010.2690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 567.Bendermacher BLW, Peppelenbosch AG, Daemen JWHC, Oude Lashof AML, Jacobs MJ. 2011. Q fever (Coxiella burnetii) causing an infected thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 53:1402–1404. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.11.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 568.Sigterman TA, Bendermacher BLW, Welten RJTJ, Krasznai A, Bouwman LH. 2013. Primary aortoduodenal fistula and Q-fever. Vasc Med 18:347–349. doi: 10.1177/1358863X13508337. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 569.Aerts PDM, van Zitteren M, Van Kasteren MEE, Buiting AGM, Heyligers JMM, Vriens PWHE. 2013. Report of two in situ reconstructions with a saphenous spiral vein graft of Coxiella burnetii-infected aneurysms of the abdominal aorta. J Vasc Surg 57:234–237. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.08.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 570.Ikediobi UT, Streit J. 2013. Chronic Q fever causing aortitis. Am J Med 126:e9–e10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 571.Prinsen J-HS, Boersma D, van Loenhout R, van Schaik PM, Verhoeven BA. 2015. Persistent endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair for acute Q-fever-infected aortocaval fistula. Vascular 23:645–647. doi: 10.1177/1708538114562658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 572.Georghiou GP, Hirsch R, Vidne BA, Raanani E. 2004. Coxiella burnetii infection of an aortic graft: surgical view and a word of caution. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 3:333–335. doi: 10.1016/j.icvts.2004.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 573.Sessa C, Vokrri L, Porcu P, Maurin M, Stahl JP, Magne J-L. 2005. Abdominal aortic aneurysm and Coxiella burnetii infection: report of three cases and review of the literature. J Vasc Surg 42:153–158. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 574.Fournier PE, Casalta JP, Piquet P, Tournigand P, Branchereau A, Raoult D. 1998. Coxiella burnetii infection of aneurysms or vascular grafts: report of seven cases and review. Clin Infect Dis 26:116–121. doi: 10.1086/516255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 575.Leahey PA, Tahan SR, Kasper EM, Albrecht M. 2016. Chronic Q-fever (Coxiella burnetii) causing abdominal aortic aneurysm and lumbar osteomyelitis: a case report. Open Forum Infect Dis 3:ofv185. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofv185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 576.Siciliano RF, Castelli JB, Mansur AJ, Pereira dos Santos F, Colombo S, do Nascimento EM, Paddock CD, Brasil RA, Velho PENF, Drummond MR, Grinberg M, Strabelli TMV. 2015. Bartonella spp. and Coxiella burnetii associated with community-acquired, culture-negative endocarditis, Brazil. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1429–1432. doi: 10.3201/eid2108.140343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 577.Terheggen U, Leggat PA. 2007. Clinical manifestations of Q fever in adults and children. Travel Med Infect Dis 5:159–164. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2006.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 578.Nourse C, Allworth A, Jones A, Horvath R, McCormack J, Bartlett J, Hayes D, Robson JM. 2004. Three cases of Q fever osteomyelitis in children and a review of the literature. Clin Infect Dis 39:e61–66. doi: 10.1086/424014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 579.Khatami A, Sparks RT, Marais BJ. 2015. A Case of Pediatric Q fever osteomyelitis managed without antibiotics. Pediatrics 136:e1629–1631. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-0024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 580.Neth OW, Falcon D, Peromingo E, Soledad Camacho M, Rodríguez-Gallego C, Obando I. 2011. Successful management of chronic multifocal Q fever osteomyelitis with adjuvant interferon-gamma therapy. Pediatr Infect Dis J 30:810–812. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31821487f5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 581.Britton PN, Macartney K, Arbuckle S, Little D, Kesson A. 2015. A rare case of Q fever osteomyelitis in a child from regional Australia. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc 4:e28–e31. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piu095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 582.Costa B, Morais A, Santos AS, Tavares D, Seves G, Gouveia C. 2015. Q fever chronic osteomyelitis in two children. Pediatr Infect Dis J 34:1269–1271. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 583.Cottalorda J, Jouve JL, Bollini G, Touzet P, Poujol A, Kelberine F, Raoult D. 1995. Osteoarticular infection due to Coxiella burnetii in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 4:219–221. doi: 10.1097/01202412-199504020-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 584.Bayard C, Dumoulin A, Ikenberg K, Günthard HF. 2015. Subacute, tetracycline-responsive, granulomatous osteomyelitis in an adult man, consistent with Q fever infection. BMJ Case Rep 2015:bcr2015212426. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2015-212426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 585.Acquacalda E, Montaudie H, Laffont C, Fournier P-E, Pulcini C. 2011. A case of multifocal chronic Q fever osteomyelitis. Infection 39:167–169. doi: 10.1007/s15010-010-0076-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 586.Landais C, Fenollar F, Constantin A, Cazorla C, Guilyardi C, Lepidi H, Stein A, Rolain JM, Raoult D. 2007. Q fever osteoarticular infection: four new cases and a review of the literature. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 26:341–347. doi: 10.1007/s10096-007-0285-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 587.da Costa PSG, Brigatte ME, Greco DB. 2006. Questing one Brazilian query: reporting 16 cases of Q fever from Minas Gerais, Brazil. Rev Inst Med Trop São Paulo 48:5–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 588.Raoult D, Fenollar F, Stein A. 2002. Q fever during pregnancy: diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. Arch Intern Med 162:701–704. doi: 10.1001/archinte.162.6.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 589.Rey D, Obadia Y, Tissot-Dupont H, Raoult D. 2000. Seroprevalence of antibodies to Coxiella burnetti among pregnant women in South Eastern France. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 93:151–156. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(00)00276-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 590.Langley JM, Marrie TJ, Leblanc JC, Almudevar A, Resch L, Raoult D. 2003. Coxiella burnetii seropositivity in parturient women is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:228–232. doi: 10.1067/mob.2003.448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 591.Baud D, Peter O, Langel C, Regan L, Greub G. 2009. Seroprevalence of Coxiella burnetii and Brucella abortus among pregnant women. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:499–501. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02779.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 592.Nielsen SY, Molbak K, Nybo Andersen AM, Brink Henriksen T, Kantso B, Krogfelt KA, Hjollund NH. 2013. Prevalence of Coxiella burnetii in women exposed to livestock animals, Denmark, 1996 to 2002. Euro Surveill 18(28):pii:20528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 593.van der Hoek W, Meekelenkamp JCE, Leenders ACAP, Wijers N, Notermans DW, Hukkelhoven CWPM. 2011. Antibodies against Coxiella burnetii and pregnancy outcome during the 2007-2008 Q fever outbreaks in The Netherlands. BMC Infect Dis 11:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 594.van der Hoek W, Meekelenkamp JCE, Dijkstra F, Notermans DW, Bom B, Vellema P, Rietveld A, van Duynhoven YTHP, Leenders ACAP. 2011. Proximity to goat farms and Coxiella burnetii seroprevalence among pregnant women. Emerg Infect Dis 17:2360–2363. doi: 10.3201/eid1712.110738. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 595.Shinar S, Skornick-Rapaport A, Rimon E. 2012. Placental abruption remote from term associated with Q fever infection. Obstet Gynecol 120:503–505. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318260590f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 596.Quijada SG, Terán BM, Murias PS, Anitua AA, Cermeño JLB, Frías AB. 2012. Q fever and spontaneous abortion. Clin Microbiol Infect 18:533–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03562.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 597.Jover-Díaz F, Robert-Gates J, Andreu-Gimenez L, Merino-Sanchez J. 2001. Q fever during pregnancy: an emerging cause of prematurity and abortion. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol 9:47–49. doi: 10.1155/S1064744901000084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 598.Coste Mazeau P, Hantz S, Eyraud J-L, Donadel L, Lacorre A, Rogez S, Aubard Y, Gauthier T. 2016. Q fever and pregnancy: experience from the Limoges Regional University Hospital. Arch Gynecol Obstet 94:233–238. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3958-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 599.Denman J, Woods M. 2009. Acute Q fever in pregnancy: report and literature review. Intern Med J 39:479–481. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2009.01933.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 600.Boden K, Brueckmann A, Wagner-Wiening C, Hermann B, Henning K, Junghanss T, Seidel T, Baier M, Straube E, Theegarten D. 2012. Maternofetal consequences of Coxiella burnetii infection in pregnancy: a case series of two outbreaks. BMC Infect Dis 12:359. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 601.Giakoumelou S, Wheelhouse N, Cuschieri K, Entrican G, Howie SEM, Horne AW. 2016. The role of infection in miscarriage. Hum Reprod Update 22:116–133. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 602.Nielsen SY, Mølbak K, Hjøllund NH. 2011. Q-fever caused spontaneous abortion. Ugeskr Laeger 173:2053–2054. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 603.Slok ENE, Dijkstra F, de Vries E, Rietveld A, Wong A, Notermans DW, van Steenbergen JE. 2015. Estimation of acute and chronic Q fever incidence in children during a three-year outbreak in the Netherlands and a comparison with international literature. BMC Res Notes 8:456. doi: 10.1186/s13104-015-1389-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 604.Parker N, Robson J, Bell M. 2010. A serosurvey of Coxiella burnetii infection in children and young adults in South West Queensland. Aust N Z J Public Health 34:79–82. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2010.00478.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 605.van der Hoek W, Sarge-Njie R, Herremans T, Chisnall T, Okebe J, Oriero E, Versteeg B, Goossens B, van der Sande M, Kampmann B, Nwakanma D. 2013. Prevalence of antibodies against Coxiella burnetii (Q fever) in children in The Gambia, West Africa. Trop Med Int Health 18:850–853. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 606.Nagaoka H, Akiyama M, Sugieda M, Nishio T, Akahane S, Hattori H, Ho T, Fukushi H, Hirai K. 1996. Isolation of Coxiella burnetii from children with influenza-like symptoms in Japan. Microbiol Immunol 40:147–151. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.1996.tb03330.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 607.Hackert VH, Dukers-Muijrers NHTM, van Loo IHM, Wegdam-Blans M, Somers C, Hoebe CJPA. 2015. Coxiella burnetii infectivity lower in children than adults following community exposure: overlooked cause of infrequent Q-fever reporting in the young. Pediatr Infect Dis J 34:1283–1288. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000000871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 608.al-Hajjar S, Hussain Qadri SM, al-Sabban E, Jäger C. 1997. Coxiella burnetii endocarditis in a child. Pediatr Infect Dis J 16:911–913. doi: 10.1097/00006454-199709000-00020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 609.Sawaishi Y, Takahashi I, Hirayama Y, Abe T, Mizutani M, Hirai K, Takada G. 1999. Acute cerebellitis caused by Coxiella burnetii. Ann Neurol 45:124–127. doi:. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 610.Boele van Hensbroek M, de Vries E, Dolan G, Schneeberger P. 2000. Rash and petechiae as presenting signs of Q fever. Pediatr Infect Dis J 19:358. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200004000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 611.Maltezou HC, Kallergi C, Kavazarakis E, Stabouli S, Kafetzis DA. 2001. Hemolytic-uremic syndrome associated with Coxiella burnetii infection. Pediatr Infect Dis J 20:811–813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 612.Ravid S, Shahar E, Genizi J, Schahor Y, Kassis I. 2008. Acute Q fever in children presenting with encephalitis. Pediatr Neurol 38:44–46. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2007.09.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 613.Baquero-Artigao F, del Castillo F, Tellez A. 2002. Acute Q fever pericarditis followed by chronic hepatitis in a two-year-old girl. Pediatr Infect Dis J 21:705–707. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200207000-00021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 614.Kubota H, Tanabe Y, Komiya T, Hirai K, Takanashi J, Kohno Y. 2001. Q fever encephalitis with cytokine profiles in serum and cerebrospinal fluid. Pediatr Infect Dis J 20:318–319. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200103000-00022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 615.Gunn TM, Raz GM, Turek JW, Farivar RS. 2013. Cardiac manifestations of Q fever infection: case series and a review of the literature. J Card Surg 28:233–237. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 616.Tasher D, Stein M, Raucher-Sternfeld A, Somekh E. 2012. Coxiella burnetii infection of a bovine jugular vein conduit in a child. Pediatr Cardiol 33:831–833. doi: 10.1007/s00246-012-0215-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 617.Cohn A, Prebble J, Robson J, Nourse C. 2012. Q fever as a cause of recurrent soft-tissue nodules and abscesses in a child. Pediatr Infect Dis J 31:525–527. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182468f0e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 618.González-Quijada S, Salazar-Thieroldt E, Mora-Simón MJ. 2015. Persistent Q fever and ischaemic stroke in elderly patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:362–367. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.11.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 619.González-Quijada S, Mora-Simón MJ, Martin-Ezquerro A. 2014. Association between serological evidence of past Coxiella burnetii infection and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in elderly patients. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:873–878. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12541. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 620.Lovey PY, Morabia A, Bleed D, Péter O, Dupuis G, Petite J. 1999. Long term vascular complications of Coxiella burnetii infection in Switzerland: cohort study. BMJ 319:284–286. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7205.284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 621.Hwang YM, Lee MC, Suh DC, Lee WY. 1993. Coxiella (Q fever)-associated myelopathy. Neurology 43:338–342. doi: 10.1212/WNL.43.2.338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 622.Lee WY, Lee JM, Park KH, Park C, Chang M, Hong WP, Park IY. 1995. Coxiella burnetii in polymorphic lymphocytes in tissue and blood of patients with polymorphic reticulosis. Acta Virol 39:269–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 623.Vuille C, Delafontaine P. 1989. Unusual manifestations of Q fever disclosing hairy cell leukemia. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 119:187–191. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 624.Ammatuna E, Iannitto E, Tick LW, Arents NLA, Kuijper PH, Nijziel MR. 2014. Two cases of Q-fever in hairy cell leukemia. Case Rep Hematol 2014:863932. doi: 10.1155/2014/863932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 625.Ayres JG, Flint N, Smith EG, Tunnicliffe WS, Fletcher TJ, Hammond K, Ward D, Marmion BP. 1998. Post-infection fatigue syndrome following Q fever. QJM 91:105–123. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/91.2.105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 626.Marmion BP, Shannon M, Maddocks I, Storm P, Penttila I. 1996. Protracted debility and fatigue after acute Q fever. Lancet 347:977–978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 627.Wildman MJ, Smith EG, Groves J, Beattie JM, Caul EO, Ayres JG. 2002. Chronic fatigue following infection by Coxiella burnetii (Q fever): ten-year follow-up of the 1989 UK outbreak cohort. QJM 95:527–538. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/95.8.527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 628.Kato K, Arashima Y, Asai S, Furuya Y, Yoshida Y, Murakami M, Takahashi Y, Hayashi K, Katayama T, Kumasaka K, Arakawa Y, Kawano K. 1998. Detection of Coxiella burnetii specific DNA in blood samples from Japanese patients with chronic nonspecific symptoms by nested polymerase chain reaction. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 21:139–144. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1998.tb01159.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 629.Arashima Y, Kato K, Komiya T, Kumasaka K, Matsukawa Y, Murakami M, Takahashi K, Ikeda T, Arakawa Y. 2004. Improvement of chronic nonspecific symptoms by long-term minocycline treatment in Japanese patients with Coxiella burnetii infection considered to have post-Q fever fatigue syndrome. Intern Med Tokyo Jpn 43:49–54. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.43.49. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 630.Iwakami E, Arashima Y, Kato K, Komiya T, Matsukawa Y, Ikeda T, Arakawa Y, Oshida S. 2005. Treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome with antibiotics: pilot study assessing the involvement of Coxiella burnetii infection. Intern Med Tokyo Jpn 44:1258–1263. doi: 10.2169/internalmedicine.44.1258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 631.Ledina D, Bradarić N, Milas I, Ivić I, Brncić N, Kuzmicić N. 2007. Chronic fatigue syndrome after Q fever. Med Sci Monit 13:CS88–CS92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 632.Ikuta K, Yamada T, Shimomura T, Kuratsune H, Kawahara R, Ikawa S, Ohnishi E, Sokawa Y, Fukushi H, Hirai K, Watanabe Y, Kurata T, Kitani T, Sairenji T. 2003. Diagnostic evaluation of 2′,5′-oligoadenylate synthetase activities and antibodies against Epstein-Barr virus and Coxiella burnetii in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome in Japan. Microbes Infect Inst Pasteur 5:1096–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2003.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 633.Hickie I, Davenport T, Wakefield D, Vollmer-Conna U, Cameron B, Vernon SD, Reeves WC, Lloyd A. 2006. Post-infective and chronic fatigue syndromes precipitated by viral and non-viral pathogens: prospective cohort study. BMJ 333:575. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38933.585764.AE. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 634.Fukuda K, Straus SE, Hickie I, Sharpe MC, Dobbins JG, Komaroff A. 1994. The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. Ann Intern Med 121:953–959. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-121-12-199412150-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 635.Hatchette TF, Hayes M, Merry H, Schlech WF, Marrie TJ. 2003. The effect of C. burnetii infection on the quality of life of patients following an outbreak of Q fever. Epidemiol Infect 130:491–495. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 636.Hussain-Yusuf H, Islam A, Healy B, Lockhart M, Nguyen C, Sukocheva O, Stenos J, Graves S. 2012. An analysis of Q fever patients 6 years after an outbreak in Newport, Wales, UK. QJM 105:1067–1073. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcs119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 637.Strauss B, Löschau M, Seidel T, Stallmach A, Thomas A. 2012. Are fatigue symptoms and chronic fatigue syndrome following Q fever infection related to psychosocial variables? J Psychosom Res 72:300–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.01.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 638.Thomas HV, Thomas DR, Salmon RL, Lewis G, Smith AP. 2004. Toxoplasma and Coxiella infection and psychiatric morbidity: a retrospective cohort analysis. BMC Psychiatry 4:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-4-32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 639.Helbig KJ, Heatley SL, Harris RJ, Mullighan CG, Bardy PG, Marmion BP. 2003. Variation in immune response genes and chronic Q fever. Concepts: preliminary test with post-Q fever fatigue syndrome. Genes Immun 4:82–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 640.Helbig K, Harris R, Ayres J, Dunckley H, Lloyd A, Robson J, Marmion BP. 2005. Immune response genes in the post-Q-fever fatigue syndrome, Q fever endocarditis and uncomplicated acute primary Q fever. QJM 98:565–574. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hci086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 641.Galbraith S, Cameron B, Li H, Lau D, Vollmer-Conna U, Lloyd AR. 2011. Peripheral blood gene expression in postinfective fatigue syndrome following from three different triggering infections. J Infect Dis 204:1632–1640. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 642.Zhang L, Gough J, Christmas D, Mattey DL, Richards SCM, Main J, Enlander D, Honeybourne D, Ayres JG, Nutt DJ, Kerr JR. 2010. Microbial infections in eight genomic subtypes of chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis. J Clin Pathol 63:156–164. doi: 10.1136/jcp.2009.072561. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 643.Marmion BP, Sukocheva O, Storm PA, Lockhart M, Turra M, Kok T, Ayres J, Routledge H, Graves S. 2009. Q fever: persistence of antigenic non-viable cell residues of Coxiella burnetii in the host–implications for post Q fever infection fatigue syndrome and other chronic sequelae. QJM 102:673–684. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcp077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 644.Sukocheva OA, Marmion BP, Storm PA, Lockhart M, Turra M, Graves S. 2010. Long-term persistence after acute Q fever of non-infective Coxiella burnetii cell components, including antigens. QJM 103:847–863. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 645.Limonard GJM, Peters JB, Nabuurs-Franssen MH, Weers-Pothoff G, Besselink R, Groot CAR, Dekhuijzen PNR, Vercoulen JH. 2010. Detailed analysis of health status of Q fever patients 1 year after the first Dutch outbreak: a case-control study. QJM 103:953–958. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcq144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 646.Limonard GJM, Peters JB, Besselink R, Groot A, Dekhuijzen RPNR, Vercoulen JH, Nabuurs-Franssen MH. 2016. Persistence of impaired health status of Q fever patients 4 years after the first Dutch outbreak. Epidemiol Infect 144:1142–1147. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815002216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 647.Morroy G, van der Hoek W, Nanver ZD, Schneeberger PM, Bleeker-Rovers CP, van der Velden J, Coutinho RA. 2016. The health status of a village population, 7 years after a major Q fever outbreak. Epidemiol Infect 144:1153–1162. doi: 10.1017/S0950268815002472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 648.van Loenhout JAF, Hautvast JLA, Vercoulen JH, Akkermans RP, Wijkmans CJ, van der Velden K, Paget WJ. 2015. Q-fever patients suffer from impaired health status long after the acute phase of the illness: results from a 24-month cohort study. J Infect 70:237–246. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2014.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 649.Keijmel SP, Saxe J, van der Meer JWM, Nikolaus S, Netea MG, Bleijenberg G, Bleeker-Rovers CP, Knoop H. 2015. A comparison of patients with Q fever fatigue syndrome and patients with chronic fatigue syndrome with a focus on inflammatory markers and possible fatigue perpetuating cognitions and behaviour. J Psychosom Res 79:295–302. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 650.Keijmel SP, Delsing CE, Sprong T, Bleijenberg G, van der Meer JWM, Knoop H, Bleeker-Rovers CP. 2013. The Qure study: Q fever fatigue syndrome—response to treatment; a randomized placebo-controlled trial. BMC Infect Dis 13:157. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-13-157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 651.Powell OW, Kennedy KP, McIVER M, Silverstone H. 1962. Tetracycline in the treatment of “Q” fever. Australas Ann Med 11:184–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 652.Sobradillo V, Zalacain R, Capelastegui A, Uresandi F, Corral J. 1992. Antibiotic treatment in pneumonia due to Q fever. Thorax 47:276–278. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.4.276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 653.Dijkstra F, Riphagen-Dalhuisen J, Wijers N, Hak E, Van der Sande MA, Morroy BG, Schneeberger PM, Schimmer B, Notermans DW, Van der Hoek W. 2011. Antibiotic therapy for acute Q fever in The Netherlands in 2007 and 2008 and its relation to hospitalization. Epidemiol Infect 139:1332–1341. doi: 10.1017/S0950268810002621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 654.Million M, Lepidi H, Raoult D. 2009. Q fever: current diagnosis and treatment options. Med Mal Infect 39:82–94. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2008.07.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 655.Kampschreur LM, Dekker S, Hagenaars JCJP, Lestrade PJ, Renders NHM, de Jager-Leclercq MGL, Hermans MHA, Groot CAR, Groenwold RHH, Hoepelman AIM, Wever PC, Oosterheert JJ. 2012. Identification of risk factors for chronic Q fever, the Netherlands. Emerg Infect Dis 18:563–570. doi: 10.3201/eid1804.111478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 656.Maurin M, Benoliel AM, Bongrand P, Raoult D. 1992. Phagolysosomal alkalinization and the bactericidal effect of antibiotics: the Coxiella burnetii paradigm. J Infect Dis 166:1097–1102. doi: 10.1093/infdis/166.5.1097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 657.Rolain JM, Mallet MN, Raoult D. 2003. Correlation between serum doxycycline concentrations and serologic evolution in patients with Coxiella burnetii endocarditis. J Infect Dis 188:1322–1325. doi: 10.1086/379082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 658.Kloppenburg GT, van de Pavoordt ED, de Vries J-PP. 2011. Endograft-preserving therapy of a patient with Coxiella burnetii-infected abdominal aortic aneurysm: a case report. J Med Case Reports 5:565. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-5-565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 659.Carcopino X, Raoult D, Bretelle F, Boubli L, Stein A. 2007. Managing Q fever during pregnancy: the benefits of long-term cotrimoxazole therapy. Clin Infect Dis 45:548–555. doi: 10.1086/520661. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 660.Cross R, Ling C, Day NPJ, McGready R, Paris DH. 2016. Revisiting doxycycline in pregnancy and early childhood—time to rebuild its reputation? Expert Opin Drug Saf 15:367–382. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2016.1133584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 661.Morisawa Y, Wakiguchi H, Takechi T, Kurashige T, Nagaoka H. 2001. Intractable Q fever treated with recombinant gamma interferon. Pediatr Infect Dis J 20:546–547. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200105000-00018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 662.Gerth HJ, Leidig U, Riemenschneider T. 1982. Q-fever epidemic in an institute of human pathology. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 107:1391–1395. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1070136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 663.Harman JB. 1949. Q fever in Great Britain; clinical account of eight cases. Lancet ii:1028–1030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 664.Anna MM, Escobar JD, Chapman AS. 2012. Reported vectorborne and zoonotic diseases, U.S. Air Force, 2000-2011. MSMR 19:11–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 665.Leung-Shea C, Danaher PJ. 2006. Q fever in members of the United States armed forces returning from Iraq. Clin Infect Dis 43:e77–82. doi: 10.1086/507639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 666.Sellens E, Norris JM, Dhand NK, Heller J, Hayes L, Gidding HF, Willaby H, Wood N, Bosward KL. 2016. Q fever knowledge, attitudes and vaccination status of Australia's veterinary workforce in 2014. PLoS One 11:e0146819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 667.Shapiro RA, Siskind V, Schofield FD, Stallman N, Worswick DA, Marmion BP. 1990. A randomized, controlled, double-blind, cross-over, clinical trial of Q fever vaccine in selected Queensland abattoirs. Epidemiol Infect 104:267–273. doi: 10.1017/S0950268800059446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 668.Gidding HF, Wallace C, Lawrence GL, McIntyre PB. 2009. Australia's national Q fever vaccination program. Vaccine 27:2037–2041. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.02.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 669.Vermeer-de Bondt PE, Schoffelen T, Vanrolleghem AM, Isken LD, van Deuren M, Sturkenboom MCJM, Timen A. 2015. Coverage of the 2011 Q fever vaccination campaign in the Netherlands, using retrospective population-based prevalence estimation of cardiovascular risk-conditions for chronic Q fever. PLoS One 10:e0123570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 670.De Rodaniche EC, Rodaniche A. 1949. Studies on Q fever in Panama. Am J Hyg 49:67–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 671.Tendeiro J. 1952. Febre Q, p 337 Centro De Estudos Da Guine Portuguesa, Bissau, Portuguese Guinea. [Google Scholar]
- 672.Pope J, Scott W, Dwyer R. 1960. Coxiella burneti in kangaroos and kangaroo ticks in western Queensland. Aust J Exp Biol Med 38:17–27. doi: 10.1038/icb.1960.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 673.Parker RR, Davis GE. 1938. A filter-passing infectious agent isolated from ticks. II. Transmission by Dermacentor andersoni. Public Health Rep 53:2267–2270. [Google Scholar]
- 674.Carley JG, Pope JH. 1953. The isolation of Coxiella burneti from the tick Ixodes holocydus in Queensland. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 31:613–614. doi: 10.1038/icb.1953.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 675.Balashov IS, Daiter AB, Khavkin TN. 1971. Distribution of Rickettsia burneti in Hyalomma asiaticum ticks (immunofluorescent and histological studies). Parazitologiia 6:22–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 676.Pchelkina AA, Zhmaeva ZM, Diuisalieva RG. 1969. Experimental infection of Ixodes ticks with the agents of Q-rickettsiosis and tick-borne encephalitis. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 46:92–98. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 677.Pchelkina AA, Vazhev AP, Kostyrko IN. 1969. Mountain focus of Q fever. Zh Microbiol Epidemiol Immunol 10:136–137. [Google Scholar]
- 678.Mantovani A, Benazzi P. 1953. The isolation of Coxiella burnetii from Rhipicephalus sanguineus on naturally infected dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 122:117–118. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 679.Zhmaeva ZM, petrischeva PA, Pchelkina AA. 1964. Blood-sucking ticks—carriers of Q fever in various landscape zones of the U.S.S.R. Zh Mikrobiol Epidemiol Immunobiol 41:28–33. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 680.Davis GE. 1943. American Q fever: experimental transmission by the argasid Ticks Ornithodoros moubata and O. hermsi. Public Health Rep 58:984–987. doi: 10.2307/4584503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 681.Daiter AB. 1960. The bed bug as a possible reservoir of Rickettsia burneti (experimental and epidemiological findings). Prob Virol 5:644–652. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 682.Zemskaya AA, Pchelkina AA. 1967. Gamasid mites and Q fever, p 258–259. Tezisi Dokladov V Nauchnoy Konferentsii Ukrainskogo Respublikanskogo Nauchnogo Obschestva Parazitologov, Kiev, Ukraine. [Google Scholar]
- 683.Botelho-Nevers E, Espinosa L, Raoult D, Rolain J-M. 2008. Lovastatin, but not pravastatin, limits in vitro infection due to Coxiella burnetii. J Antimicrob Chemother 62:845–847. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn282. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 684.Minnick MF, Hicks LD, Battisti JM, Raghavan R. 2010. Pentamidine inhibits Coxiella burnetii growth and 23S rRNA intron splicing in vitro. Int J Antimicrob Agents 36:380–382. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 685.Lamas CC, Fournier P-E, Zappa M, Brandão TJD, Januário-da-Silva CA, Correia MG, Barbosa GIF, Golebiovski WF, Weksler C, Lepidi H, Raoult D. 2016. Diagnosis of blood culture-negative endocarditis and clinical comparison between blood culture-negative and blood culture-positive cases. Infection 44:459–466. doi: 10.1007/s15010-015-0863-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 686.Fernández Guerrero ML, Rivas P, García Delgado R. 2004. Migratory thrombophlebitis and acute Q fever. Emerg Infect Dis 10:546–547. doi: 10.3201/eid1003.030859. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 687.Gomes MM, Chaves A, Gouveia A, Santos L. 2014. Two rare manifestations of Q fever: splenic and hepatic abscesses and cerebral venous thrombosis, with literature review ma non troppo. BMJ Case Rep 2014:bcr2013202843. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-202843. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 688.de Silva T, Chapman A, Kudesia G, McKendrick M. 2006. Ongoing queries: interpretation of serology in asymptomatic or atypical chronic Q fever. J Infect 52:e113–e116. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2005.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]