We thank Dr. Martínez-Girón for the interest in our article about bronchopulmonary Lophomonas blattarum infection.[1] However, all the reported cases of bronchopulmonary L. blattarum infection are just relied on light microscopic findings. None of the evidences in literatures can be further confirmed by culture, animal models, or multiple molecular procedures. In addition, there is no evidence that L. blattarum infection is an endemic disease so far, which makes the infection with geographical limitations hard to explain. Moreover, there is no evidence that L. blattarum can be found in the living environment of the patients by cockroach dissection,[2] although some cases had epidemiological history of cockroach exposure. The hypothesis raised by Dr. Martínez-Girón for the transmission of L. blattarum needs further confirmation,[3] and the first step is finding the sources of the infection. Furthermore, the differentiation between L. blattarum and ciliated epithelial cells is very difficult to observe under light microscope practically although there are many differential points described by literatures. We carefully reviewed the literatures about bronchopulmonary L. blattarum infection in the past two decades.[4] All L. blattarum images published in literatures are either extremely similar or identical with the ciliated epithelial cells that we found by light microscopy. None of the literatures confirmed L. blattarum using electron microscopy nor referred to the typical description of L. blattarum in 1969 and 1990.[5,6] We think ultrastructure under electron microscope is most reliable for the differentiation between L. blattarum and ciliated epithelial cells, which is never adopted in the published cases so far. In the absence of effective molecular biologic or culture approaches to identify L. blattarum currently, the infection is still a mystery without the confirmation using Koch's hypothesis. Therefore, bronchopulmonary L. blattarum infection is still a pending issue. And, we hope more studies can be carried out to make the debates to an end earlier.
References
- 1.Li R, Gao ZC. Lophomonas blattarum infection or just the movement of ciliated epithelial cells? Chin Med J. 2016;129:739–42. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.178025. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.178025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Liu B, Jin LY, Lei DL, Chen SM, et al. One case report of pulmonary Lophomonas blattarum infection (in Chinese) Chin J Intern Med. 2007;46:665. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Martínez-Girón R. Parabasalids in respiratory secretions and lung diseases. Chest. 2015;147:e111–2. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2465. doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mu XL, Shang Y, Zheng SY, Zhou B, Yu B, Dong XS, et al. A study on the differential diagnosis of ciliated epithelial cells from Lophomonas blattarum in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (in Chinese) Chin J Tuberc Respir Dis. 2013;36:646–50. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2013.09.003. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kessel RG, Beams HW. Freeze fracture and scanning electron microscope studies on the nuclear envelope and perinuclear cytomembranes (parabasal apparatus) in the protozoan, Lophomonas blattarum. J Submicrosc Cytol Pathol. 1990;22:367–78. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Beams HW, Sekhon SS. Further studies on the fine structure of Lophomonas blattarum with special reference to the so-called calyx, axial filament, and parabasal body. J Ultrastruct Res. 1969;26:296–315. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5320(69)80009-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
