Skip to main content
Journal of Bacteriology logoLink to Journal of Bacteriology
. 2004 Oct;186(20):7007–7014. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.20.7007-7014.2004

Genome-Wide Transcriptional Analysis of the Cold Shock Response in Wild-Type and Cold-Sensitive, Quadruple-csp-Deletion Strains of Escherichia coli

Sangita Phadtare 1,*, Masayori Inouye 1
PMCID: PMC522181  PMID: 15466053

Abstract

A DNA microarray-based global transcript profiling of Escherichia coli in response to cold shock showed that in addition to the known cold shock-inducible genes, new genes such as the flagellar operon, those encoding proteins involved in sugar transport and metabolism, and remarkably, genes encoding certain heat shock proteins are induced by cold shock. In the light of strong reduction in metabolic activity of the cell after temperature downshift, the induction of sugar metabolism machinery is unexpected. The deletion of four csps (cspA, cspB, cspG, and cspE) affected cold shock induction of mostly those genes that are transiently induced in the acclimation phase, emphasizing that CspA homologues are essential in the acclimation phase. Relevance of these findings with respect to the known RNA chaperone function of CspA homologues is discussed.


The cold shock response is a physiological response of living cells to temperature downshift (12) and has been studied in detail using Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis as model systems (for a review, see references 5, 21, 26, and 32). When an exponentially growing culture of E. coli is shifted from 37 to 15°C, an acclimation phase (lag period of cell growth) characterized by transient dramatic induction of cold shock proteins against a severe inhibition of general protein synthesis precedes the resumption of growth. Out of the nine CspA homologues of E. coli, only CspA, CspB, CspG, and CspI are cold shock inducible (6, 17, 20, 31). Interestingly, double or triple deletions of genes encoding cold shock-inducible CspA homologues do not result in cold sensitivity. In a triple-deletion strain, the ΔcspA ΔcspB ΔcspG strain, CspE that is normally produced at 37°C is overproduced at low temperatures (33). This observation suggests that the functions of the CspA family members may overlap and they are able to substitute for each other during cold acclimation. Indeed a quadruple-deletion strain (the ΔcspA ΔcspB ΔcspG ΔcspE strain) of E. coli exhibits cold sensitivity at 15°C, which can be complemented by overproduction of any one of the CspA homologues except CspD (33).

In spite of a wealth of knowledge accumulated in recent years, the cold shock response is not fully elucidated. The proteomic approaches that so far have been extremely useful in identification of many cold shock-induced proteins do have certain limitations: (i) not all the proteins can be resolved well on two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, and (ii) identification of proteins from the gel may sometimes be cumbersome. To overcome these shortcomings, in the present study, we carried out analysis of global cold shock gene expression profiles of an E. coli wild-type and cold-sensitive quadruple-deletion strain. Our main objectives were (i) to identify the E. coli open reading frames that exhibit significant increase or decrease in mRNA abundance caused by the temperature downshift and (ii) to explore the effect of deletion of four csp genes that leads to cold sensitivity. In brief, the E. coli JM83 strain [F araΔ(lac-proAB) rpsL(Strr)] (35) (considered the wild-type strain in this study) was grown in Luria broth (LB). The cells grown overnight in LB medium at 37°C were diluted into fresh LB medium. Cells were grown at 37°C to exponential phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD600] of 0.8), and part of the cell culture was harvested and used as a control. Aliquots of the cells were transferred to a prechilled LB medium at 15°C, and the cells were harvested after 1 and 5 h of cold shock. The OD600 did not increase after 1 h of cold shock, while after 5 h of cold shock, it was 1.2. The 37°C controls were of corresponding OD600 values. For studies involving the quadruple-deletion strain, the wild-type and the deletion strain were grown at 37°C and subsequently cold shocked for 1 h as described above. Note that in the studies involving the quadruple-deletion strain, both the wild-type and the deletion cells are cold shocked at 15°C for 1 h and compared with each other. This enables us to directly single out the genes that were differentially expressed as a result of csp deletion upon cold shock. The RNA extraction and hybridization and DNA array analysis were carried out as described previously (24). The cell density of all samples used was the same; thus, the changes seen in the microarray were not substantially influenced by the difference in cell densities. Genes whose expression levels differed by a ratio of at least 4 after cold shock were considered. From replicates, we estimate that the chance random fluctuations giving rise to a fourfold up- or down-modulation is less than 0.14%, corresponding to a confidence interval of 99.86%. Thus, the chosen fourfold cutoff value is rather stringent and the modulation of expression beyond the cutoff is highly statistically significant. In some cases, genes belonging to the same operon or category were considered even if the ratios did not adhere to these specified values. Ratios above 1 indicate induction and below 1 indicate repression. Ratios averaged from three independent of sets of experiments are shown with standard deviation values.

The result of the microarray analysis was confirmed by Northern blot analysis. The genes chosen for these experiments represent the important groups changed by the cold shock treatment, such as cspA and those encoding proteins involved in sugar metabolism, molecular chaperones, and iron metabolism. The deoxyoligonucleotides used for detection of cspA and dps were described previously (22, 24, 34). The deoxyoligonucleotides used for detection of malT (4) (accession number M13585), mopB (19), rbsD (3), and fecA (29) correspond to the region from codons 13 to 6 of malT and mopB, 21 to 14 of rbsD, and 13 to 8 of fecA. The Northern blot analysis was carried out as described previously (30). The results are shown in Fig. 1. These results are consistent with the microarray data.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Effect of cold shock on the levels of mRNAs. Total RNA was extracted by the hot phenol method as described in the text, and Northern blot analysis was carried out with deoxyoligonucleotides corresponding to cspA, malT, dps, mopB, rbsD, and fecA. Lanes 1 and 2 in each case except fecA represent mRNAs isolated from control (37°C) and cold-shocked (1 h) wild-type cells, respectively. In the case of fecA, lanes 1 and 2 represent mRNAs isolated from cold-shocked (1 h) wild-type and quadruple-deletion cells, respectively. The positions of the transcripts were determined using as reference ribosomal RNAs. Bands corresponding to 23S and 16S rRNAs were visualized by ethidium bromide staining of the gel.

The reliability of the present data was confirmed by (i) reproducible values obtained in multiple, independent experiments, (ii) induction of many known cold shock-inducible genes, and (iii) confirmation of levels of some of the significantly affected genes by Northern blot analysis. Our data did not show mRNA abundance of certain genes known to be cold shock-inducible, for example, genes belonging to the nusA-pnp operon, such as nusA, infB, rbfA, and pnp. The reason for this is not known at present; however, this observation is similar to that from a recent report by Polissi et al. (27), in which the discrepancy was attributed to differential stability of the 3′ end and the entire mRNA transcripts.

The genes affected by cold shock are grouped as those that (i) are transiently induced immediately following the cold shock in the acclimation phase (Table 1), (ii) show transient repression upon cold shock (Table 2), (iii) show prolonged induction beyond the acclimation phase (Table 3), and (iv) show prolonged repression upon cold shock.

TABLE 1.

Genes transiently induced upon cold shock

Gene name and role Gene product and/or function Wild-type 15°C/37°C ratio at 1 h Wild-type 15°C/37°C ratio at 5 h Mutant/wild-type ratio (15°C, 1 h)
Genes involved in membrane synthesis/function
    aer Aerotaxis receptor 9.8 ± 0.14 4.8 ± 0.4
    atoE Short-chain fatty acid transporter 6.5 ± 0.5 3 ± 0.5 0.22 ± 0.08
    dctA DctA protein 7.8 ± 1.07 1.75 ± 0.6 0.1 ± 0
    fabB 3-Oxoacyl-[acyl-carrier protein] synthase I 13 ± 1.1 2.6 ± 0.35
    glnH Glutamine-binding protein precursor 6.1 ± 0.73 1 ± 0.1
    malE, -F, -K, -M Maltose transport proteins 9.0-10 ± 0.5 0.5-2.7 ± 0.1 0.03-0.08 ± 0.01
    manY Phosphotransferase system enzyme II 8.9 ± 0.28 1.9 ± 0.2 0.13 ± 0.02
    manZ PTS system, mannose-specific IID component 6.9 ± 0.39 0.3 ± 0.01 0.14 ± 0.03
    nupC Nucleoside permease NupC 9.3 ± 0.015 1.2 ± 0.09
    rbsA-D Ribose transport proteins 5.0-10 ± 0.8 1.5-2 ± 0.2 0.05-0.09 ± 0.02
    sanA SanA protein 4.3 ± 0.28 2.1 ± 0.5
    trg Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein III 9.2 ± 0.8 4.1 ± 0.6
    xylF d-Xylose-binding periplasmic protein precursor 20 ± 2.1 3.5 ± 0.4 0.24 ± 0.03
    ybeJ Amino acid ABC transporter binding protein 6.8 ± 0.08 1.8 ± 0.5
Genes involved in cell metabolism
    adhE Alcohol dehydrogenase 18.8 ± 0.48 3.2 ± 0.45
    agp Glucose-1-phosphatase precursor 16 ± 2 2.9 ± 0.3 0.21 ± 0.06
    aldA Aldehyde dehydrogenase 15 ± 1.5 0.15 ± 0.01 0.15 ± 0.01
    aphA Acid phosphatase 16.2 ± 0.44 2.1 ± 26 0.12 ± 0.005
    aspA Aspartate ammonia-lyase 20 ± 3 7.3 ± 0.8 0.13 ± 0.005
    bfr Bacterioferritin 5 ± 1 1 ± 0.1
    carA Carbamoyl-phosphate synthase small chain 8.5 ± 0.15 0.9 ± 0.1
    cfa Cyclopropane fatty acid synthase 8.2 ± 1.16 3.7 ± 0.9
    cpdB Cyclic nucleotide 2'phosphodiesterase 10 ± 2 1.6 ± 0.15 0.12 ± 0.03
    cysK Cysteine synthase 7 ± 1.27 0.6 ± 0.025
    deoA Thymidine phosphorylase 21.8 ± 1.02 3.6 ± 0.33
    fpr Ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase 4.5 ± 0.45 1.6 ± 0.31
    fruB PTS system, fructose-specific IIA/FPR component 7 ± 0.16 0.8 ± 0.2 0.16 ± 0.03
    fruK 1-Phosphofructokinase (fructose 1-phosphate kinase) 6.5 ± 0.75 0.7 ± 0.2 0.18 ± 0.015
    fucU Fucose operon FucU protein 6.3 ± 0.87 2.7 ± 0.22
    fumA Fumarate hydratase 9.3 ± 0.79 1 ± 0.08
    gapA Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 13.5 ± 1.2 2.3 ± 0.3 0.2 ± 0.01
    glpK Glycerol kinase 12.8 ± 0.55 1 ± 0.02
    lipA Lipoic acid synthetase (lip-syn) 4.2 ± 0.02 1.7 ± 0.25
    malP Maltodextrin phosphorylase 20 ± 2.5 4 ± 0.75
    malQ 4-Alpha-glucanotransferase 6.3 ± 0.46 3 ± 0.075
    malT MalT regulatory protein 12 ± 0.72 4.2 ± 0.22
    manX Phosphotransferase system enzyme II 11.4 ± 0.7 2.4 ± 0.03 0.13 ± 0.03
    mdh Malate dehydrogenase 3.2 ± 0.3 0.28 ± 0 0.24 ± 0.05
    nrdD Oxygen-sensitive ribonucleoside-triphosphate reductase 15.2 ± 1.58 1.8 ± 0.22
    otsA Tehalose-6-phosphate synthase 4.3 ± 0.12 1 ± 0.29
    otsB Trehalose-phosphatase 2.7 ± 0.19 0.7 ± 0.15
    pgi Glucose-6-phosphate isomerase 6.1 ± 0.15 1.7 ± 0.15 0.19 ± 0.025
    poxB Pyruvate oxidase 3.6 ± 0.6 0.18 ± 0.02 0.25 ± 0.04
    pykA Pyruvate kinase 7.4 ± 0.14 0.75 ± 0.16 0.16 ± 0
    rbsK Ribokinase 5.1 ± 0.34 2.9 ± 0.37 0.19 ± 0.04
    srlA Phosphoenolpyruvate-carbohydrate phosphotransferase system, glucitol/sorbitol-specific IIBC component 9.3 ± 1.3 2.7 ± 0
    srlB Phosphotransferase system enzyme II 4.4 ± 0.22 1.5 ± 0.3
    srlD Sorbitol-6-phosphate 2-dehydrogenase 5.1 ± 0.23 1.5 ± 0.02
    srlR Glucitol operon repressor 5.5 ± 0.06 2.6 ± 0.4
    treB Phosphotransferase system trehalose permease 6 ± 1 0.7 ± 0.01
    treC Trehalose-6-phosphate hydrolase 6 ± 1.1 0.45 ± 0.05
    udp Uridine phosphorylase 10 ± 1.5 0.62 ± 0.02 0.08 ± 0
    ybeK Pyrimidine-specific nucleoside hydrolase 10.2 ± 0.55 1.6 ± 0.2
Genes encoding proteins with diverse functions
    cspA CspA 4 ± 0.3 1 ± 0.1
    cspB CspB 9 ± 0.4 1 ± 0.1
    cspG CspG 6 ± 0.5 0.8 ± 0.07
    cspl Cspl 2 ± 0.03 0.7 ± 0.05
    dps DNA-binding protein Dps 10 ± 1.3 0.9 ± 0.015 0.05 ± 0.01
    grxB Glutaredoxin 2 4.7 ± 0.4 1 ± 0.06
    hns DNA-binding protein H-NS 4.8 ± 0.8 2.4 ± 0.5 0.5 ± 0.1
    hobH DNA binding protein, replication-origin specific 10 ± 2 2 ± 0.35 0.15 ± 0.07
    htpG Heat shock protein C62.5 4.5 ± 0.5 1.6 ± 0.4 0.27 ± 0.005
    kbl 2-Amino-3-ketobutyrate coenzyme A ligase 4.8 ± 0.24 1.8 ± 0.2
    mdaA Modulator of drug activity A 11.6 ± 0.06 4 ± 0.9
    mlc Making large colonies protein 6.8 ± 0.29 2.5 ± 0.67
    mopA GroEL protein 9.3 ± 0.88 1.3 ± 0.21 0.13 ± 0.01
    mopB GroES protein 8 ± 1 0.9 ± 0.02 0.18 ± 0.04
    ppiA Peptidyl-prolyl-cis-trans-isomerase A precursor 4.6 ± 0.51 1.7 ± 0.24 0.22 ± 0.06
    rimJ Ribosomal-protein-alanine acetyltransferase 6.5 ± 0.74 2.7 ± 0.03
    sseA Putative thiosulfate sulfurtransferase 7.6 ± 1.2 1.8 ± 0.15

TABLE 2.

Genes showing transient repression upon cold shock in the wild-type strain

Gene name and role Gene product and/or function 15°C/37°C ratio at 1 h 15°C/37°C ratio at 5 h
Genes involved in membrane synthesis/function
    fecA Iron(III) dicitrate transport protein FecA precursor 0.02 ± 0.005 0.22 ± 0.001
    fecB Iron(III) dicitrate-binding periplasmic protein precursor 0.04 ± 0.01 0.3 ± 0.08
    fecC FecC protein 0.02 ± 0 0.9 ± 0.2
    fecE Membrane-bound iron (III) dicitrate transport protein 0.01 ± 0.005 0.9 ± 0.07
    fepC Ferric enterobactin transport protein FepC 0.14 ± 0.03 0.7 ± 0.06
    fimD FimD protein 0.29 ± 0.04 1.9 ± 0.13
    kgtP Alpha-ketoglutarate permease 0.3 ± 0.02 0.45 ± 0.01
    lgt Prolipoprotein diacylglyceryl transferase 0.25 ± 0.005 0.54 ± 0.12
    lolA Outer membrane lipoproteins carrier protein precursor 0.27 ± 0.005 0.6 ± 0.04
    msbA MsbA protein 0.26 ± 0.015 0.6 ± 0.02
    nlpD Lipoprotein D precursor 0.7 ± 0.02 0.26 ± 0.02
    oppB Oligopeptide transport system permease protein 0.31 ± 0 1.1 ± 0.1
    oppC Oligopeptide permease membrane protein 0.27 ± 0.01 1.5 ± 0.2
    plsX PlsX protein 0.16 ± 0.03 1 ± 0.005
    potA Spermidine/putrescine transport protein A 0.22 ± 0.01 0.45 ± 0.08
    potB Spermidine/putrescine transport system permease protein PotB 0.12 ± 0.01 0.31 ± 0.045
    potC Spermidine/putrescine transport system permease protein PotC 0.19 ± 0.025 0.31 ± 0.015
    proP Proline/betaine transport protein 0.17 ± 0.01 0.48 ± 0.01
    proV Glycine betaine/I-proline transport ATP-binding protein ProV 0.01 ± 0.005 0.06 ± 0.005
    proW Glycine betaine/proline transport system protein prow 0.04 ± 0 0.07 ± 0.015
    proX Glycine betaine-binding periplasmic protein precursor 0.08 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.01
    secG P12 cytoplasmic membrane protein 0.3 ± 0.005 0.57 ± 0.05
    tolA TolA protein 0.29 ± 0.025 1.2 ± 0.2
    trkH TrkH protein 0.33 ± 0 1.3 ± 0.2
    wzxE Lipopolysaccharide biosynthesis protein 0.19 ± 0 0.88 ± 0.03
Genes involved in cell metabolism
    aceB Malate synthase A (Msa) 0.04 ± 0 0.1 ± 0.005
    adhC Formaldehyde dehydrogenase (glutathione) 0.26 ± 0.035 0.45 ± 0.045
    argB Acetylglutamate kinase 0.18 ± 0.01 0.75 ± 0.01
    argC N-acetyl-gamma-glutamyl-phosphate reductase 0.12 ± 0.04 3 ± 0.4
    argD Acetylomithine aminotransferase 0.14 ± 0.02 0.3 ± 0.1
    argG Argininosuccinate synthase 0.15 ± 0.04 1.3 ± 0.15
    argH Argininosuccinate lyase 0.25 ± 0.08 0.4 ± 0.05
    aroA 3-Phosphoshikimate 1-carboxyvinyltransferase 0.2 ± 0.01 0.45 ± 0.07
    aroB 3-Dehydroquinate synthase 0.3 ± 0.015 1.2 ± 0.24
    cmk Cytidylate kinase (cytidine monophosphate kinase) 0.24 ± 0.02 0.4 ± 0.01
    ddg Ddg protein 0.1 ± 0.01 1.4 ± 0.01
    fdhE FdhE protein 0.27 ± 0 0.7 ± 0.6
    folP Dihydropteroate synthase 0.29 ± 0.03 0.5 ± 0.02
    glcF Glycolate oxidase iron-sulfur subunit 0.07 ± 0.005 1.7 ± 0.27
    gltB Glutamate synthase (NADPH) large chain precursor 0.12 ± 0.02 0.5 ± 0.005
    hisF Cyclase HisF 0.3 ± 0.02 0.8 ± 0.2
    iclR Repressor protein IclR 0.08 ± 0.01 0.56 ± 0.005
    phoH PhoH protein 0.5 ± 0.07 0.08 ± 0.005
    psd Phosphatidylserine decarboxylase precursor 0.32 ± 0 0.43 ± 0.01
    rffH Glucose-1-phosphate thymidylyltransferase 0.2 ± 0.01 0.55 ± 0.05
    thil Thiamin biosynthesis protein 0.27 ± 0.09 1.7 ± 0.5
    thyA Thymidylate synthase 0.28 ± 0 0.45 ± 0.02
    truA Pseudouridylate synthase I 0.31 ± 0.01 0.7 ± 0.08
Genes encoding proteins with diverse functions
    dedA DedA protein 0.29 ± 0.02 0.45 ± 0.07
    dedE DedE protein 0.3 ± 0.025 0.5 ± 0.09
    dinG Probable ATP-dependent helicase DinG 0.24 ± 0.003 1.4 ± 0.13
    dnaG DNA primase 0.2 ± 0.015 1.1 ± 0.13
    fkpA FkpA protein 0.29 ± 0.005 0.47 ± 0.005
    fldB Flavodoxin 0.32 ± 0.005 1.26 ± 0
    ftsH Cell division protein FtsH, protease 0.25 ± 0.01 0.9 ± 0.06
    ftsJ/rrmJ Cell division protein, 23S rRNA methyltransferase 0.29 ± 0.015 1.2 ± 0.12
    ftsK Cell division protein FtsK 0.2 ± 0.01 0.9 ± 0.07
    gidA GidA protein 0.24 ± 0.01 0.8 ± 0.09
    hflC HflC protein 0.22 ± 0.02 0.54 ± 0
    hflK HflK protein 0.25 ± 0.01 0.7 ± 0.06
    holA DNA-directed DNA polymerase III delta chain 0.31 ± 0.005 0.7 ± 0.12
    hscA Heat shock cognate protein 66 0.09 ± 0.01 0.7 ± 0.13
    ksgA Dimethyladenosine transferase 0.24 ± 0.04 0.75 ± 0.07
    lepA GTP-binding protein LepA 0.28 ± 0.02 0.5 ± 0.03
    mrcA Penicillin-binding protein 1a (pbp-1a) 0.28 ± 0.02 1.3 ± 0.01
    mrdB Rod shape-determining protein MrdB 0.18 ± 0.02 0.74 ± 0.02
    pepB Peptidase B 0.17 ± 0 0.3 ± 0.06
    priA Primosomal replication factor Y 0.27 ± 0.015 1.1 ± 0.3
    recB Exodeoxyribonuclease V 135-kDa polypeptide 0.22 ± 0.01 1.2 ± 0.03
    recC Exodeoxyribonuclease V 125-kDa polypeptide 0.32 ± 0.01 0.9 ± 0.06
    recJ Single-stranded-DNA-specific exonuclease 0.3 ± 0.02 1.2 ± 0.17
    rimM 16S rRNA processing protein 0.16 ± 0.005 0.47 ± 0
    mhA Ribonuclease HI 0.26 ± 0.02 0.85 ± 0.15
    rpoA DNA-directed RNA polymerase alpha chain 0.23 ± 0.03 0.6 ± 0.03
    rpoB DNA-directed RNA polymerase beta chain 0.18 ± 0.005 0.4 ± 0.02
    rrmA rRNA (guanine-N1)-methyltransferase 0.25 ± 0.045 0.15 ± 0.025
    rtn Rtn protein 0.28 ± 0.01 1.65 ± 0.13
    sdiA SdiA regulatory protein 0.26 ± 0.025 0.44 ± 0.005
    sodA Superoxide dismutase 0.26 ± 0.01 0.07 ± 0.01
    tnpR Resolvase 0.08 ± 0.005 0.4 ± 0.1
    topA DNA topoisomerase I 0.23 ± 0.025 0.35 ± 0.04
    trmD tRNA (guanine-n1)-methyltransferase 0.17 ± 0.005 0.42 ± 0.02

TABLE 3.

Genes showing prolonged induction upon cold shock

Gene name and role Gene product and/or function Wild-type 15°C/37°C ratio at 1 h Wild-type 15°C/37°C ratio at 5 h Mutant/ wild-type ratio (15°C, 1 h)
Genes involved in membrane synthesis/function
    cheW Chemotaxis protein CheW, adapter protein 3.5 ± 0.05 5.4 ± 0.01
    cheY Chemotaxis protein CheY 4.3 ± 0.09 3.6 ± 0.51
    dcuA Anaerobic C4-dicarboxylate transporter DcuA 7.4 ± 0.36 7.3 ± 0.7
    dmsC Dimethylsulfoxide reductase chain C 4.3 ± 0.09 7 ± 1
    flg and fli Flagellar proteins 2.0-12 ± 0.5 4.0-13 ± 1 0.01-0.1 ± 0
    frdA Fumarate reductase flavoprotein subunit 20 ± 0.5 15 ± 1 0.2 ± 0.02
    frdB Fumarate reductase iron-sulfur protein 17 ± 0.9 11 ± 0.9
    frdD Fumarate reductase, 13-kDa membrane anchor protein 6 ± 0.55 3.5 ± 0.7
    glpQ Glycerophosphodiester phosphodiesterase 4.3 ± 0.13 5.5 ± 1
    glpT Glycerol-3-phosphate transport protein 7.8 ± 0.33 6.1 ± 0.36
    hybA HybA protein 8.4 ± 0.92 8 ± 1
    hybB HybB protein 4.6 ± 0.23 11 ± 1.5
    hybC HybC protein 4.5 ± 0.13 6 ± 0.6
    hypB Hydrogenase isoenzymes formation protein 17.8 ± 1.37 17 ± 1.5
    hypE HypE protein 5.3 ± 0.12 13 ± 1.3
    nupG Nucleoside-transporting protein NupG 18.6 ± 2.28 15 ± 1.4
    ompC Outer membrane protein C precursor 5 ± 0.1 4 ± 0.08 0.24 ± 0.02
    ompT Proteinase VII precursor 19.7 ± 1.25 57 ± 6
    tap Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein II 4.2 ± 0.12 4.8 ± 0.4
    tar Methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein II 11.1 ± 0.85 7.8 ± 1
Genes involved in cell metabolism
    ackA Acetate kinase 4.2 ± 0 5.5 ± 0.02
    ansB Asparaginase 10.8 ± 0.16 25.3 ± 3
    asnB Asparagine synthase 5.1 ± 0.34 6 ± 2
    cydA Cytochrome d ubiquinol oxidase subunit I 3.8 ± 0.35 5.7 ± 0.9
    ftn Ferritin 13 ± 1 13 ± 0.9
    fumB Fumarate hydratase 9.6 ± 1.34 9.6 ± 1.5
    glpB Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 20.3 ± 1.43 14.8 ± 0.28
    glpC Glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase 27.4 ± 3.7 14.1 ± 2.5
    pflB Formate C-acetyltransferase 5.6 ± 0.46 5.5 ± 1.5
    wrbA Trp repressor binding protein 15 ± 2 8 ± 1
Genes encoding proteins with diverse functions
    clpB ClpB protein (heat shock protein) 10.4 ± 0.4 9.4 ± 0.39
    gst Glutathione transferase 7.4 ± 0.36 5.1 ± 1
    hsdR Type I restriction enzyme EcoKI R protein 9 ± 1 9.7 ± 0.92
    katG Catalase HPI 17 ± 0.06 12.3 ± 1
    speG Spermidine n1-acetyltransferase 3 ± 0.25 5 ± 0.38

Genes transiently induced and repressed in the acclimation phase upon cold shock.

The present analysis showed transient induction of a number of known cold shock-inducible genes, for example, cspA, cspB, cspG, cspI, otsA, otsB, and ppiA (Table 1). Other known genes such as gyrA (twofold), infA (twofold), infC (2.8-fold), and recA (threefold) were also induced. New genes shown by the present analysis to be cold shock-inducible in the acclimation phase include the following: (i) transport or metabolism of sugars (fructose, glucose, glycerol, maltose, mannose, ribose, and xylose) and (ii) molecular chaperones (mopA and mopB, encoding GroEL and GroES, respectively, htpG, and ppiA). Deletion of four csp genes led to repression of cold shock induction of all these genes (Table 1). Although cold shock response is characterized by strong repression of the major metabolic activity of the cell, the present study showed induction of several new genes after the temperature downshift. Transport and metabolism systems for sugars deserve special mention in this aspect. Cold shock caused induction of otsA (trehalose-6-phosphate synthase) and otsB (trehalose-6-phosphate phosphatase) (Table 1), consistent with the previously reported possible protective effect of this sugar upon cold shock (14). However, such a protective effect is not known for sugars such as ribose or mannose that were induced in the present system, and this induction could simply be a manifestation of the cell gearing up for the low-temperature-adapted metabolism. It should be noted that recently, cold stress accumulation and protective effect of maltose in plants was reported (16). It is interesting that cold shock induction of mannose and maltose transport systems was prominently repressed in the quadruple deletion that has significantly prolonged (4 h) lag period as opposed to the 1-h lag period of the wild-type strain (33) after the temperature downshift. This suggests that cold shock induction of these genes is indeed relevant for the cold acclimation of the cells.

As the cold shock response of the quadruple-deletion strain was severely affected, many genes repressed in the wild type upon cold shock were further repressed in the deletion strain. In addition to the genes listed in Table 1, the genes repressed in the quadruple-deletion strain included those involved in transport (ATP synthase, DctA protein, DsdX permease, fatty acid transport protein, maltoporin precursor, OmpF, OmpX, thiamine-binding protein precursor, and tryptophan permease) and a number of genes involved in cellular metabolism (especially amino acids and sugars).

On the other hand, a few genes were transiently induced in the quadruple-deletion strain compared with the wild-type strain, and these prominently constitute the genes encoding proteins involved in transport of iron, such as exbD, fecA to fecD, fepC, and fhuA and fhuF (Table 4). It is not clear why deletion of csp genes should result in induction of iron transport. It is noteworthy that these genes were repressed in the wild-type cells upon temperature downshift. In fact, judging from Table 4, a very divergent group of genes was induced by deletion of the four csp genes.

TABLE 4.

Genes induced by cold shock in the quadruple-deletion strain

Gene name and role Gene product and/or function Mutant/wild type ratio (15°C, 1 h)
Genes involved in membrane synthesis/function
    exbD ExbD protein 4.4 ± 0.2
    fecA Iron(III) dicitrate transport protein FecA precursor 4 ± 0.21
    fecB Iron(III) dicitrate-binding periplasmic protein precursor 12.5 ± 1.1
    fecC FecC protein 4 ± 0.2
    fecD Iron(III) dicitrate transport system permease protein 5.2 ± 0.18
    fecE Membrane-bound iron(III) dicitrate transport protein 5.8 ± 0.4
    fepC Ferric enterobactin transport protein FepC 3.2 ± 0.08
    fhuA Ferrichrome-iron receptor precursor 3.9 ± 0.4
    fhuF Ferric hydroxamate transport protein 7 ± 0.2
    livK Leucine transport protein LivK precursor 4.8 ± 0.4
Genes involved in cell metabolism
    acpS Holo-[acyl-carrier protein] synthase 3 ± 0.1
    aroE Shikimate 5-dehydrogenase 4.3 ± 0.25
    aroG Phospho-2-dehydro-3-deoxyheptonate aldolase 4.2 ± 0.3
    cobU Cobinamide kinase 3.9 ± 0.2
    ddg Ddg protein 5.4 ± 0.4
    gltD Glutamate synthase 5.5 ± 0.18
    gltF GltF protein 4.8 ± 0.4
Genes encoding proteins with diverse functions
    creA CreA protein 5.1 ± 0.05
    deaD ATP-dependent RNA helicase 5 ± 1
    fimE Type 1 fimbriae regulatory protein FimE 5.5 ± 1
    fimF FimF protein 7 ± 1.1
    hha Hha protein 3.6 ± 0.5
    intA Prophage cp4-57 integrase 3.5 ± 0.19
    rhlE Putative ATP-dependent RNA helicase RhIE 4.1 ± 0.4
    rpoE RNA polymerase sigma-E factor (sigma-24) 4.6 ± 0.44
    rseB RseB protein 3.2 ± 0.5
    rseC Sigma-E factor regulatory protein 5.5 ± 0.4
    sdiA SdiA regulatory protein 3.5 ± 0.12
    tnpR Resolvase 5.1 ± 0.6

In addition to the genes listed in Table 2, most of the genes encoding ribosomal L proteins showed transient reduced levels during acclimation phase in the wild-type strain, although in the latter the effect was not severe (approximately two- to threefold) and their synthesis recovered after continued growth at 15°C for 5 h. This result is consistent with cold shock two-dimensional gel electrophoresis data published for E. coli (26).

In addition, the products of a number of genes, such as ybdQ, ycfP, ydaA, ydhO, yeaA, yedU, yeeX, yefI, yfbU, yfiA, yfjL, yggG, ygjR, yhbT, yhjH, yieP, yqeB, yqhD, and yzzQ, increased significantly, although the products have not been assigned any functions. On the other hand, priB, yaeG, yafK, ybiR, ybiT, ycaJ, ycaO, yccA, yceD, yceP, ycfC, ycfV, ycfX, ycgE, ydgR, ydiU, yedA, yedl, yfcA, yfK, yfgL, yfgM, yfiH, yfiR, ygdE, yggN, yhaD, yhaE, yhaF, yhaU, yhbM, yheQ, yhiN, yjgP, yqgE, yqgF, and yrbE were repressed.

Genes showing prolonged induction and repression upon cold shock.

Genes encoding flagellar proteins were induced and maintained at high levels even after 5 h at 15°C in the wild-type strain and were down-regulated in the quadruple-deletion strain. Spermidine acetyltransferase encoded by speG is required to prevent spermidine toxicity at low temperatures in E. coli (18). Our DNA microarray analysis showed a steady increase in speG levels from three- to fivefold at 1 to 5 h after temperature downshift (Table 3). On the other hand, genes such as tas (Tas protein), artP (ArtP protein), those mainly involved in amino acid and nucleotide biosynthesis, such as trpB, and leu, pur, and pyr operon genes were repressed even 5 h after cold shock. All of these showed further down-regulation in the quadruple-deletion strain.

Cold shock induction of genes encoding heat shock proteins.

Protein misfolding was previously not considered a major problem upon cold shock. But increasing numbers of recent reports of a heat shock protein being induced by cold shock even in higher systems suggest that proper folding of proteins as well as refolding of cold-damaged proteins is important after cold shock. However, in most of these cases the heat shock induction of proteins is after prolonged incubation at low temperature (10, 28). On the other hand, in the present study, a number of genes encoding heat shock-inducible proteins and molecular chaperones such as htpG, mopA, mopB, and ppiA (encoding HtpG, GroEL, GroES, and peptidyl-prolyl-cis-trans-isomerase, respectively) showed transient induction immediately following cold shock. ClpB, which is both heat and cold shock-inducible in Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942 (28) was induced 10-fold and maintained at this level even at 5 h after temperature downshift (Table 3). ppiA, encoding peptidyl-prolyl-cis-trans-isomerase, is also reported from Bacillus, is involved in accelerating proline-limited steps in protein folding, and is important in helping protein folding at low temperatures (7, 8). Trigger factor encoded by tig is another interesting chaperone, which is moderately induced 2 to 3 h after cold shock (15). It is not included in Table 1, as it does not fulfill the criteria of the required n-fold increase; however, we did find moderate (1.7-fold) induction of this gene. Previously, it was also shown that when E. coli is grown at 16°C, GroEL expression is reduced (15); however, in that study the cells were grown to an OD600 of 0.5, and then the protein expression was checked by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. In the present study, the immediate effect of cold shock is being analyzed (1 h). Both mopA and mopB were induced 9.3- and 8-fold after 1 h and then reduced to a basal level of 1.3- and 0.9-fold, respectively, after 5 h. Thus, our data are consistent with the low level of GroEL observed by these authors after cells reached the OD600 of 0.5 at 16°C. Note that the OD600 increased by 0.4 at 5 h after cold shock in the present study. This suggests that the GroELS system is transiently induced immediately after the temperature downshift, along with the induction of CspA homologues, and is then reduced to a basal level. It should be mentioned that GroEL is induced in E. coli at 37°C by the overexpression of CspC and CspE, although this induction is lesser than its heat shock induction (22). On the same note, the present study showed that deletion of four CspA homologues leads to repression of cold shock induction of mopA and mopB (Table 1). This suggests a possibility that cold shock induction of GroEL may be linked to the higher levels of CspA homologues.

Comparison of cold shock response of E. coli and B. subtilis.

DNA microarray analysis of the cold shock response of B. subtilis has been carried out by two groups (2, 13). Our study showed that there are a number of common genes such as leuBCD (amino acid biosynthesis) and purBCDEFHKLMN (purine biosynthesis) that are affected by cold shock in E. coli and Bacillus spp. Other such examples include topA (DNA topoisomerase I), gltB, arg, and aro genes (amino acid biosynthesis) (Table 2). There are certain genes that are not included in the tables, as their ratios do not fulfill the criteria of the required n-fold difference; however, these are worth mentioning as they are affected by cold shock in Bacillus spp. The genes and the respective n-fold differences are as follows: (i) amino acid biosynthesis, aroF and aroH (0.5 and 0.6, respectively), metC (0.7), and serC (0.6); (ii) tRNA synthetases, aspS (0.6), hisS (0.5), and thrS (0.75); (iii) NAD biosynthesis, nifS (0.7) and nadC (0.7); (iv) ATP synthase, atpA, atpB, atpE, atpF, atpH, and atpI (approximately 0.5); (vi) pyrimidine biosynthesis, pyrC (0.75); (vii) citric acid cycle, sdhC (0.8); and (viii) metabolism, bioA and bioD (0.5 to 0.6) and ptb (2). However, there were also differences between E. coli and Bacillus cold shock response. For example, in the case of Bacillus spp., the ribosomal proteins were induced by cold shock, while in E. coli, these were either repressed or showed no significant change. One of these two analyses in Bacillus showed repression of GroEL 70 min after cold shock (2), while the present study shows induction of the GroELS system in E. coli 1 h after cold shock. This suggests that in spite of common basic principles in the cold shock response of E. coli and Bacillus spp., there are certain distinct differences.

CspA homologues are needed at acclimation phase.

At low temperature, the secondary structures of RNA stabilize, which should slow down (i) transcription elongation and (ii) ribosomal movement on RNA and thus translation. The Csps are transiently and dramatically induced in the acclimation phase upon cold shock. These presumably act as RNA chaperones (1, 9, 11, 23, 25) by destabilizing the secondary structures in RNA and thus facilitating transcription and translation. Increased levels of CspA homologues after cold shock may be important for compensating for higher stability of secondary structures in RNA at low temperatures (11). The RNA chaperone effect of CspA homologues is apparent in the present microarray analysis, as cold shock induction of a number of diverse genes was repressed by deletion of four csp genes. These may be the genes that need help to transcribe and translate efficiently at low temperature, possibly due to stabilization of secondary structures in their mRNAs, and the high level of Csps ensures their effective production. It is noteworthy that, except for the flagellar operon, deletion of four csp genes mainly affected genes that are transiently induced during acclimation phase. This emphasizes the need for the RNA chaperones immediately upon cold shock, and once the cells are acclimated to cold, their presence is no longer required. This is supported by the observations that cold shock induction of Csps is transient and the quadruple-deletion strain shows a prolonged lag period after cold shock. Further studies on the effect of Csps on the transcription and translation of genes, especially those encoding GroELS, maltose, the ribose operon, and flagellar proteins, should prove to be useful in this aspect.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (GM 19043) to M.I.

We thank Takara Bio Inc. Japan for DNA array chips and help in analysis of the array scans. We also thank Anirvan Sengupta and Ruadhan O'Flanagan for their help in statistical analysis of the data and K. V. Chin for his useful suggestions in the scanning of the DNA arrays.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bae, W., B. Xia, M. Inouye, and K. Severinov. 2000. Escherichia coli CspA-family RNA chaperones are transcription antiterminators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:7784-7789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Beckering, C. L., L. Steil, M. H. Weber, U. Volker, and M. A. Marahiel. 2002. Genomewide transcriptional analysis of the cold shock response in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 184:6395-6402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bell, A. W., S. D. Buckel, J. M. Groarke, J. N. Hope, D. H. Kingsley, and M. A. Hermodson. 1986. The nucleotide sequences of the rbsD, rbsA, and rbsC genes of Escherichia coli K12. J. Biol. Chem. 261:7652-7658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boos, W., and H. Shuman. 1998. Maltose/maltodextrin system of Escherichia coli: transport, metabolism, and regulation. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 62:204-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ermolenko, D. N., and G. I. Makhatadze. 2002. Bacterial cold-shock proteins. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 59:1902-1913. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Goldstein, J., N. S. Pollitt, and M. Inouye. 1990. Major cold shock protein of Escherichia coli. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:283-287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Graumann, P., K. Schroder, R. Schmid, and M. A. Marahiel. 1996. Cold shock stress-induced proteins in Bacillus subtilis. J. Bacteriol. 178:4611-4619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Graumann, P. L., and M. A. Marahiel. 1999. Cold shock response in Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1:203-209. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Graumann, P. L., and M. A. Marahiel. 1998. A superfamily of proteins that contain the cold-shock domain. Trends Biochem. Sci. 23:286-290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hossain, M. M., and H. Nakamoto. 2002. HtpG plays a role in cold acclimation in cyanobacteria. Curr. Microbiol. 44:291-296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jiang, W., Y. Hou, and M. Inouye. 1997. CspA, the major cold-shock protein of Escherichia coli, is an RNA chaperone. J. Biol. Chem. 272:196-202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jones, P. G., R. A. VanBogelen, and F. C. Neidhardt. 1987. Induction of proteins in response to low temperature in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 169:2092-2095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kaan, T., G. Homuth, U. Mader, J. Bandow, and T. Schweder. 2002. Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of the Bacillus subtilis cold-shock response. Microbiology 148:3441-3455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kandror, O., A. DeLeon, and A. L. Goldberg. 2002. Trehalose synthesis is induced upon exposure of Escherichia coli to cold and is essential for viability at low temperatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:9727-9732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kandror, O., and A. L. Goldberg. 1997. Trigger factor is induced upon cold shock and enhances viability of Escherichia coli at low temperatures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 94:4978-4981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kaplan, F., and C. L. Guy. 2004. Beta-amylase induction and the protective role of maltose during temperature shock. Plant Physiol. 135:1674-1684. (First published 9 July 2004; 10.1104/pp.104.040808.) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee, S. J., A. Xie, W. Jiang, J. P. Etchegaray, P. G. Jones, and M. Inouye. 1994. Family of the major cold-shock protein, CspA (CS7.4), of Escherichia coli, whose members show a high sequence similarity with the eukaryotic Y-box binding proteins. Mol. Microbiol. 11:833-839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Limsuwun, K., and P. G. Jones. 2000. Spermidine acetyltransferase is required to prevent spermidine toxicity at low temperatures in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 182:5373-5380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lindler, L. E. 1994. Nucleotide sequence of the Escherichia coli groE promoter. Gene 146:129-130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nakashima, K., K. Kanamaru, T. Mizuno, and K. Horikoshi. 1996. A novel member of the cspA family of genes that is induced by cold shock in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 178:2994-2997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Phadtare, S. 2004. Recent developments in bacterial cold-shock response. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 6:125-136. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Phadtare, S., and M. Inouye. 2001. Role of CspC and CspE in regulation of expression of RpoS and UspA, the stress response proteins in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 183:1205-1214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Phadtare, S., M. Inouye, and K. Severinov. 2002. The nucleic acid melting activity of Escherichia coli CspE is critical for transcription antitermination and cold acclimation of cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277:7239-7245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Phadtare, S., I. Kato, and M. Inouye. 2002. DNA microarray analysis of the expression profile of Escherichia coli in response to treatment with 4,5-dihydroxy-2-cyclopenten-1-one. J. Bacteriol. 184:6725-6729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Phadtare, S., S. Tyagi, M. Inouye, and K. Severinov. 2002. Three amino acids in Escherichia coli CspE surface-exposed aromatic patch are critical for nucleic acid melting activity leading to transcription antitermination and cold acclimation of cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277:46706-46711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Phadtare, S., Yamanaka, K., and M. Inouye. 2000. The cold shock response, p. 33-45. In G. Storz and R. Hengge-Aronis (ed.), Bacterial stress responses. ASM Press, Washington, D.C.
  • 27.Polissi, A., W. De Laurentis, S. Zangrossi, F. Briani, V. Longhi, G. Pesole, and G. Deho. 2003. Changes in Escherichia coli transcriptome during acclimatization at low temperature. Res. Microbiol. 154:573-580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Porankiewicz, J., and A. K. Clarke. 1997. Induction of the heat shock protein ClpB affects cold acclimation in the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. strain PCC 7942. J. Bacteriol. 179:5111-5117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Pressler, U., H. Staudenmaier, L. Zimmermann, and V. Braun. 1988. Genetics of the iron dicitrate transport system of Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol. 170:2716-2724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sambrook, J., E. F. Fritsch, and T. Maniatis. 1989. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual, vol. 2. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Plainview, N.Y.
  • 31.Wang, N., K. Yamanaka, and M. Inouye. 1999. CspI, the ninth member of the CspA family of Escherichia coli, is induced upon cold shock. J. Bacteriol. 181:1603-1609. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Weber, M. H., and M. A. Marahiel. 2003. Bacterial cold shock responses. Sci. Prog. 86:9-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Xia, B., H. Ke, and M. Inouye. 2001. Acquirement of cold sensitivity by quadruple deletion of the cspA family and its suppression by PNPase S1 domain in Escherichia coli. Mol. Microbiol. 40:179-188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Xia, B., H. Ke, W. Jiang, and M. Inouye. 2001. The Cold Box stem-loop proximal to the 5′-end of the Escherichia coli cspA gene stabilizes its mRNA at low temperature. J. Biol. Chem. 277:6005-6011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Yanisch-Perron, C., J. Vieira, and J. Messing. 1985. Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene 33:103-119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Bacteriology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES