Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Integr Med. 2016 Jul 20;8(5):619–620. doi: 10.1016/j.eujim.2016.07.025

A Summary of a Cochrane Review: Ganoderma lucidum (Reishi mushroom) for the treatment of cancer

Nancy Santesso 1,, L Susan Wieland 2
PMCID: PMC5222619  NIHMSID: NIHMS807238  PMID: 28083078

1. Introduction

Review authors in the Cochrane Collaboration conducted a review of the effects of Ganoderma lucidum from Reishi mushrooms for the treatment of cancer. After searching for all relevant studies, they identified 5 studies that compared Ganoderma lucidum from Reishi mushrooms to placebo or to cancer treatment in people with cancer. There were 3 studies with people who had advanced lung cancer, one study with people who had surgery for rectal cancer, and another study with people who had different kinds of cancers. This summary presents the findings of these 5 studies.

1.1. Ganoderma lucidum and treatment of cancer

Cancer can be treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy to kill cancer/tumour cells. Ganoderma lucidum is an extract from Reishi mushrooms and is used by physicians and naturopaths in Asia to treat cancer. In the laboratory, it has been shown to kill tumour cells and boost the activity of lymphocytes, such as natural killer cells (NK), T-cells and B-cells, tumour necrosis factor (TNF), and phagocytes (which ingest other cells). This review was carried out to summarize the evidence on whether Ganoderma lucidum can increase survival, lead to better responses to treatment, and improve the body’s immune response in people who have cancer.

2. What does the research say?

There were 5 studies with 373 people who were randomly selected to receive either Ganoderma lucidum or a placebo or other treatment. Although most studies were from 1 to 3 months in duration, the lengths of treatment and specific dosages of Ganoderma lucidum were not clear..

The evidence from the studies was of low to very low quality. The quality was lower because most studies did not clearly describe how people were randomised or allocated to treatment with Ganoderma lucidum or to a placebo or other treatment, and there were few or very few people in the studies. In some cases, the results from the individual studies were also inconsistent. Based on the evidence to date, using Ganoderma lucidum for cancer treatment may increase the chance of better response to treatment, but this is uncertain. It may improve the body’s immune response, in particular, on T-cells, but the effect on natural killer cells (NK activity) is uncertain. It may improve quality of life and it may have little or no effect on adverse events. These studies were all short-term and did not measure survival after cancer, which is an important outcome that should be measured in future research (see Table 1). The authors of the review also noted that it may be possible that Ganoderma lucidum has better effects when used in combination with other cancer treatments instead of when it is used alone, but that this also requires more research to determine.

Summary of Findings Table.

Effects of Ganoderma lucidum for the treatment of cancer

What was measured Effect when NOT
receiving Ganoderma
lucidum
Effect when receiving
Ganoderma lucidum
Quality of
the evidence
What happens when receiving
Ganoderma lucidum
Survival Not measured in the studies
Good response to
treatment (full or
partial response)
(2 studies, 85 people)
20 out of 100 people 10 more people
(from 2 fewer to 30 more)
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowa
There may be more people with full
or partial response to treatment, but
this is uncertain.
Number of people with
better quality of life
(3 studies, 284 people)
30 out of 100 people 45 more people
(from 26 to 70 more)
⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowb
There may be more people with better
quality of life.
Activity of natural killer
cells (NK)
(2 studies, 89 people)
One study reported that NK activity was greater with
Ganoderma lucidum. The other study found the
opposite effect.
⊕⊝⊝⊝
very lowc
The effect on natural killer cell
activity is uncertain.
Higher levels mean better
activity.
Immune response (T-
cells)
(4 studies, 213 people)
Higher levels mean better
activity.
The CD3, CD4, and CD8 cell counts increased by
about 2–4% more with Ganoderma lucidum.
⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowb
The immune response may be
increased.
Adverse events
(5 studies, 373 people)
No studies reported hepatitis, abnormal liver function
tests, or any other abnormal laboratory tests. In one
study, 3 people taking Ganoderma lucidum reported
nausea or insomnia.
⊕⊕⊝⊝
lowb
There may be little or no effect on
adverse events.

a. Details about the quality of the evidence:

a

Evidence was very low quality because it is unclear if some of the studies appropriately randomised people to receive Ganoderma lucidum or not, and there were very few people in the studies providing data.

b

Evidence was low quality because it is unclear if some of the studies appropriately randomised people to receive Ganoderma lucidum or not, and there were few people in the studies providing data.

c

Evidence was very low quality because it is unclear if some of the studies appropriately randomised people to receive Ganoderma lucidum or not, there were few people in the studies providing data, and the results were inconsistent.

3. Where does this information come from?

This summary is based on a Cochrane systematic review: Jin X, Ruiz Beguerie J, Sze DMY, Chan GCF. Ganoderma lucidum (Reishi mushroom) for cancer treatment. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 4. Art. No.: CD007731. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007731.pub3.

The Cochrane Collaboration is an independent global network of people who publish Cochrane systematic reviews. Many of the people are volunteers who write reviews by pulling together scientific studies to answer health care questions. These reviews may answer questions about whether, for example, certain vitamins work in diabetes. The Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field promotes Cochrane systematic reviews which cover complementary and alternative medicine in many conditions and diseases. For more information, please visit http://cam.cochrane.org.

Acknowledgments

This article was prepared on behalf of the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field with funding from the US National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) of the US National Institutes of Health (grant number R24 AT001293). This Summary of Findings column series in the European Journal of Integrative Medicine is coordinated and edited by L. Susan Wieland, the Coordinator of the Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

RESOURCES