Skip to main content
Journal of Clinical Microbiology logoLink to Journal of Clinical Microbiology
. 2004 Oct;42(10):4850–4852. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4850-4852.2004

Multiplex Detection of Mutations in Clinical Isolates of Rifampin-Resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Short Oligonucleotide Ligation Assay on DNA Chips

Jiao-Yu Deng 1,2, Xian-En Zhang 1,*, Hong-Bing Lu 1, Qiang Liu 1, Zhi-Ping Zhang 1, Ya-Feng Zhou 1, Wei-Hong Xie 1, Zhi-Jun Fu 3
PMCID: PMC522320  PMID: 15472360

Abstract

A new approach, short-oligonucleotide-ligation assay on DNA chip (SOLAC), is developed to detect mutations in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. The method needs only four common probes to detect 15 mutational variants of the rpoB gene within 12 h. Fifty-five rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis isolates were analyzed, resulting in 87.3% accuracy and 83.6% concordance relative to DNA sequencing.


Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the major public health problems worldwide, and it has been more serious since the reemergence of multidrug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis (2, 6).

Rifampin was believed to target the RNA polymerase of M. tuberculosis and thereby kill the organism by interfering in the transcription process (13). More than 95% of rifampin-resistant (Rifr) M. tuberculosis strains carry mutations in an 81-bp rifampin resistance-determining region (RRDR) in the rpoB gene (9, 14, 15), making it a good target for molecular diagnosis.

Early diagnosis of TB and rapid testing of rifampin resistance are important to efficient treatment and control of drug-resistant TB. Conventional culture-based methods for drug susceptibility testing usually take more than 1 month. To detect drug-resistant M. tuberculosis strains more rapidly, methods based on molecular diagnosis have been developed (3, 7, 12, 14, 17), with which drug resistance detection could be completed in 1 day or in hours.

In a previous study, we designed a DNA chip using the principle of an oligonucleotide ligation assay for multiplex detection of single-nucleotide polymorphism (4). Based on this approach, here we report a new protocol, short-oligonucleotide-ligation assay on chip (SOLAC), for multiplex detection of DNA mutations in rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis. The method needs only four biotin-labeled common probes to detect 15 mutational variants in the RRDR of the rpoB gene. Another advantage of the method is that the discrimination result is visualized directly through enzyme-linked assay. The method was evaluated by using a panel of M. tuberculosis isolates obtained from local clinical patients in Wuhan who were suspected of infection with rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis.

M. tuberculosis strains and drug susceptibility test.

The 60 M. tuberculosis isolates were recovered from 60 unrelated patients with newly diagnosed pulmonary TB. They originated from the Wuhan region of China and were admitted to the hospitals of the Wuhan Tuberculosis Prevention and Cure Institute between 1998 and 2003. Species identification of the isolates was based on standard microbiological tests: colony morphology, acid-fast staining, and biochemical tests (18, 19). All clinical isolates were grown on Löwenstein-Jensen medium. Rifampin resistance tests were performed by the absolute concentration method described previously (10).

Preparation of DNA samples from M. tuberculosis cultures and PCR amplification.

DNA from cultured cells was extracted as described previously (11). Two-milliliter aliquots of clear supernatant were used for PCR. A 130-bp segment of the rpoB gene that contains the RRDR region was amplified by PCR (forward primer, 5′-GCCGCGATCAAGGAGTTCTTC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GCACGTTCACGTGACAGACC-3′). The amplification was carried out as follows: 5 min at 94°C; 30 cycles of 45 s at 94°C, 45 s at 57°C, 30 s at 72°C; and 5 min at 72°C. The PCR products were purified with E.N.Z.A cycle-pure kits purchased from Omega Bio-tek (Doraville, Ga.).

Oligonucleotide design and chip preparation.

Twenty-five oligonucleotides were designed (Table 1), including four common (Com) probes, three extra (Ex) probes, and 18 allele-specific (A) probes. They were divided into three groups (groups 16, 26, and 31). DNA chips were prepared as described previously (4).

TABLE 1.

Probes designed to detect mutations in the rpoB gene

Amino acid position and probea Size Group Sequence (5′→3′)b
516
    516Com1 9 Biotin-GTTGTTCTG
    516Com2 15 Biotin-CAGCGGGTTGTTCTG
    516Wt 15 16 pGTCCATTTTTTTTTT
    516A1 15 16 pGACCATTTTTTTTTT
    516A2 16 31 pGTACAATTTTTTTTTT
    516A3 15 16 pGCCCATTTTTTTTTT
    516A4 15 16 pCACCATTTTTTTTTT
526
    526Com 15 Biotin-CGACAGTCGGCGCTT
    526Wt 15 26 pGTGGGATTTTTTTTTT
    526A1 15 26 pGTAGGTTTTTTTTTTT
    526A2 15 26 pGTCGGTTTTTTTTTTT
    526A3 16 26 pGTTGGTTTTTTTTTTT
    526A4 16 26 pGAGGGTTTTTTTTTTT
    526A5 16 26 pGCGGGTTTTTTTTTTT
    526A6 16 26 pTTGGGTTTTTTTTTTT
    526A7 16 26 pCTGGGTTTTTTTTTTT
    526Ex 15 TCAACCCCGACAGCG
531
    531Com 15 Biotin-CCCCAGCGC
    531Wt 15 31 pCGACATTTTTTTTTT
    531A1 15 31 pCAACATTTTTTTTTT
    531A2 15 31 pCCACATTTTTTTTTT
    531A3 15 31 pCGGCATTTTTTTTTT
    531A4 16 31 pAGACAGTTTTTTTTTT
    531Ex1 11 AGACCGCCGGG
    531Ex2 15 CGCTTGTGGGTCAA
a

Com, common probe; Wt, wild-type probe; A, allele-specific probe; Ex, extra probe.

b

The italic “T” was modified (CH2)6-S-S-(CH2)6-(PO4) on the 3′ end. The common probes contained biotin labels on their 5′ ends. The allele-specific probes contained 5′-phosphate groups and the discriminating bases near their 5′ ends (in bold). Subscript p, 5′-phosphate group.

Multiplex detection of point mutations in the rpoB gene.

All of the allele-specific probes were immobilized into the wells. Three sets of oligonucleotides corresponding to the three groups of allele-specific probes were prepared in tubes. The first set contained 1.0 μM 516Com1. The second set included 0.75 μM 526Com, 1 μM 531Ex1, and 0.5 μM 526Ex. The third set included 1.0 μM 516Com2, 1.5 μM 531Com, and 1.5 μM 531Ex2. The 130-bp PCR products were denatured at 100°C for 5 min and then cooled on ice for 5 min. After denaturation, PCR products (about 200 ng per 10 μl of reaction mixture) were mixed with other components (10 mM MgCl2, 10 mM dithiothreitol, 1 mM ATP, and T4 phage DNA ligase [3 U per 10 μl of reaction mixture]) and three sets of oligonucleotides. Ligation reactions were performed at three temperatures. Optimal reaction temperatures for the reactions containing the first, second, and third set of oligonucleotides were 26, 30, and 21°C, respectively. Ligation products were visualized by avidin-alkaline phosphatase conjugates as previously described (4).

DNA sequencing of the rpoB gene.

A 442-bp fragment including the RRDR region of the rpoB gene was sequenced after PCR amplification in order to analyze the mutations associated with rifampin resistance. The PCR was performed by using another pair of primers: forward primer, 5′-CAGACCACGATGACCGTTCC-3′; reverse primer, 5′-GAGCCGATCAGACCGATGTT-3′. The amplification products were directly sequenced by Shanghai CASarray Co., Ltd.

The optimal ligation temperatures of short allele-specific oligonucleotides cannot be estimated by biological analysis software. To optimize the reaction temperature for multiplex ligation, three common mutants (with 516GAC→GTC, 526CAC→TAC, and 531TCG→TTG substitutions) were constructed. In addition, DNA samples from 15 Rifr strains with known sequences (obtained from Wuhan Tuberculosis Prevention and Cure Institute) were also used in the optimization process. The G+C content of the nucleotides, the length of allele-specific oligonucleotides, and the length of the common probes were the main factors being adjusted in optimization. After optimization, the allele-specific probes were divided into three groups according to their optimal ligation temperatures.

A total of 25 probes were designed, including 18 allele-specific short oligonucleotides, four common probes, and three extra probes. In a previous study, we found that sometimes extra probes were needed to enhance ligation efficiency (4). The three extra probes were designed for this purpose. The 18 allele-specific probes were covalently immobilized on the glass slides to form DNA chips, with which 15 mutational variants of the rpoB gene could be detected within 12 h. These variants are found in nearly 85% of all mutants whose rifampin resistance is caused by mutations in the RRDR of the rpoB gene. The 130-bp PCR products from 60 clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis, 55 known to be rifampin resistant and 5 known to be rifampin sensitive, were scanned for mutations by the SOLAC assay. Among the 55 rifampin-resistant isolates, 47 were found to harbor point mutations belonging to seven types (Fig. 1). In addition, a deletion mutation in one isolate was also found by this method (data not shown). Subsequent DNA sequencing of the RRDR in the rpoB gene confirmed mutations within these isolates (Table 2). Thus, the accuracy of the SOLAC assay was 87.3% (48 of 55), and the concordance between the SOLAC results and those of DNA sequencing was 83.6% (46 of 55). No mutations were found in six rifampin-sensitive isolates, including H37Rv, by SOLAC; the results were fully concordant with those of DNA sequencing.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1.

Multiplex detection of point mutations in codon 526 of the rpoB gene in rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis. (A) Probes 526Wt, 526A1, 526A2, 526A3, 526A4, 526A5, 526A6, and 526A7 were immobilized onto loci 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, respectively. Mutations in codon 526 of the rpoB gene in four rifampin-resistant M. tuberculosis clinical isolates (1, 8, 13, and 54) were detected at four separate arrays (A, B, C, and D). Reactions were performed at 30°C for 2 h. No mutation in codon 526 was found in one isolate, and three substitutions in codon 526 (C→T, C→G, and A→G) were detected in the other three isolates (B, C, and D, respectively). All the results were verified by DNA sequencing.

TABLE 2.

Detection of rpoB gene mutations of M. tuberculosis in Wuhan by SOLAC compared with DNA sequencing results

Number of strains Rifampin resistancea Mutationsb
SOLAC assay DNA sequencing
26 R 531 TCG→TTG 531 TCG→TTG
3 R 531 TCG→TGG 531 TCG→TTG
7 R 526 CAC→TAC 526 CAC→TAC
3 R 526 CAC→GAC 526 CAC→GAC
3 R 526 CAC→CGC 526 CAC→CGC
2 R 516 GAC→TAC 516 GAC→TAC
3 R 516 GAC→GTC 516 GAC→GTC
1 R 531 TCG→TTG 531 TCG→TTG, 511 CTG→TTG
1 R 526 negativec 526 CAC→AC, one base deletion
1 R WT 511 CTG→CGG
2 R WT 513 CAA→CTA
1 R WT 533 CTG→CCG
3 R WT WT
1 (H37Rv) S WT WT
5 S WT WT
a

R, resistant; S, sensitive.

b

WT, wild type.

c

Negative, no results of ligation could be seen.

Seven Rifr isolates that were verified to be rifampin resistant by conventional susceptibility testing gave false wild-type results by the SOLAC assay, which implies that this method has limitations in the following situations: (i) some mutations, e.g., L511N, Q513L, and L533P, are outside the detection range; and (ii) sometimes no mutation exists in the RRDR of the rpoB gene even though the isolates are resistant to rifampin (other resistance mechanisms, such as a permeability barrier or drug efflux pumps, probably exist). Similar results were reported from independent investigations using different methods (1, 5, 8, 16).

In spite of its limitations, the SOLAC assay obviously has a number of advantages. First, the ligation condition is nonstringent, enabling the typing of multiple nucleotide substitutions in a single assay yet requiring specificity at the site of interest. Second, the assay is highly adaptable: additional oligonucleotides can be easily incorporated to detect more mutations in the target DNA. Third, the SOLAC method needs much less common probe than the conventional oligonucleotide ligation assay in detection of multiple DNA mutations. This feature further facilitates multiplex detection of DNA mismatches in a single reaction in combination with DNA chips. Furthermore, this assay is simple to perform and interpret and does not require expensive equipment or technical expertise. Finally, either enzyme labeling or fluorescent labeling can be incorporated into the common probes to generate positive signals, allowing the sensitive and automatic scanning of a large number of clinical samples with or without specific equipment.

Acknowledgments

Support from the Ministry of Science and Technology (project number 2001BA756C) and Chinese Academy of Sciences is acknowledged.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bártfai, Z., Á. Somoskövi, C. Ködmön, N. Szabó, E. Puskás, L. Kosztolányi, E. Faragó, J. Mester, L. M. Parsons, and M. Salfinger. 2001. Molecular characterization of rifampin-resistant isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from Hungary by DNA sequencing and the line probe assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:3736-3739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cohn, D. L., F. Bustreo, and M. C. Raviglione. 1997. Drug-resistant tuberculosis: review of the worldwide situation and the WHO/IUATLD Global Surveillance Project. Clin. Infect. Dis. 24:S121-S130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Cooksey, R. C., G. P. Morlock, S. Glickman, and J. T. Crawford. 1997. Evaluation of a line probe assay kit for characterization of rpoB mutations in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates from New York City. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35:1281-1283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Deng, J. Y., X. E. Zhang, Y. Mang, Z. P. Zhang, Y. F. Zhou, Q. Liu, H. B. Lu, and Z. J. Fu. 2004. Oligonucleotide ligation assay-based DNA chip for multiplex detection of single nucleotide polymorphism. Biosens. Bioelectron. 19:1277-1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Fan, X.-Y., Z.-Y. Hu, F.-H. Xu, Z.-Q. Yan, S.-Q. Guo, and Z.-M. Li. 2003. Rapid detection of rpoB gene mutations in rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated in Shanghai by using the amplification refractory mutation system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41:993-997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Frieden, T. R., L. F. Sherman, K. L. Maw, P. I. Fujiwara, J. T. Crawford, B. Nivin, V. Sharp, D. Hewlett, Jr., K. Brudney, D. Alland, and B. N. Kreisworth. 1996. A multi-institutional outbreak of highly drug-resistant tuberculosis: epidemiology and clinical outcomes. JAMA 276:1229-1235. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Head, S. R., K. Parikh, Y. H. Rogers, W. Bishai, P. Goelet, and M. T. Boyce-Jacino. 1999. Solid-phase sequence scanning for drug resistance detection in tuberculosis. Mol. Cell. Probes 13:81-87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Heep, M., B. Brandstatter, U. Rieger, N. Lehn, E. Richter, S. Rusch-Gerdes, and S. Niemann. 2001. Frequency of rpoB mutations inside and outside of the cluster I region in rifampin-resistant clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:107-110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hirano, K., C. Abe, and M. Takahashi. 1999. Mutations in the rpoB gene of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains isolated mostly in Asian countries and their rapid detection by line probe assay. J. Clin. Microbiol. 37:2663-2666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kim, S. J., and Y. P. Hong. 1992. Drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Korea. Tuber. Lung Dis. 73:219-224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mikhailovich, V., S. Lapa, D. Gryadunov, A. Sobolev, B. Strizhkov, N. Chernyh, O. Skotnikova, O. Irtuganova, A. Moroz, V. Litvinov, M. Vladimirskii, M. Perelman, L. Chernousova, V. Erokhin, A. Zasedatelev, and A. Mirzabekov. 2001. Identification of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains by hybridization, PCR, and ligase detection reaction on oligonucleotide microchips. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39:2531-2540. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Nash, K. A., A. Gaytan, and C. B. Inderlied. 1997. Detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis by means of a rapid, simple, and specific RNA/RNA mismatch. J. Infect. Dis. 176:533-536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ovchinnikov, Y. A., G. S. Monastyrskaya, V. V. Gubano, V. M. Lipkin, E. D. Sverdlov, I. F. Kiver, I. A. Bass, S. Z. Mindlin, O. N. Danilevskaya, and R. B. Khesin. 1981. Primary structure of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase nucleotide substitution in the β subunit gene of rifampicin resistant rpoB255 mutant. Mol. Gen. Genet. 184:536-538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Telenti, A., P. Imboden, F. Marchesi, D. Lowrie, S. Cole, M. J. Colston, L. Matter, K. Schopfer, and T. Bodmer. 1993. Detection of rifampicin-resistance mutations in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Lancet 341:647-650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Telenti, A., P. Imboden, F. Marchesi, T. Schmidheini, and T. Bodmer. 1993. Direct, automated detection of rifampin-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis by polymerase chain reaction and single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 37:2054-2058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Watterson, S. A., S. M. Wilson, M. D. Yates, and F. A. Drobniewski. 1998. Comparison of three molecular assays for rapid detection of rifampin resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J. Clin. Microbiol. 36:1969-1973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Williams, D. L., L. Spring, M. Salfinger, T. P. Gillis, and D. H. Persing. 1998. Evaluation of polymerase chain reaction-based universal heteroduplex generator assay for direct detection of rifampin susceptibility of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from sputum specimens. Clin. Infect. Dis. 26:446-450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.World Health Organization. 1998. Laboratory services in tuberculosis control. Part II. Microscopy, p. 43. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
  • 19.World Health Organization. 1998. Laboratory services in tuberculosis control. Part III. Culture, p. 77. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Articles from Journal of Clinical Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES