Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nanomaterials logoLink to Nanomaterials
. 2016 Sep 14;6(9):173. doi: 10.3390/nano6090173

Facile Synthesis of g-C3N4 Nanosheets/ZnO Nanocomposites with Enhanced Photocatalytic Activity in Reduction of Aqueous Chromium(VI) under Visible Light

Xiaoya Yuan 1,*, Chao Zhou 1, Qiuye Jing 1, Qi Tang 1, Yuanhua Mu 1, An-ke Du 2,*
Editors: Hongqi Sun, Zhaohui Wang
PMCID: PMC5224650  PMID: 28335301

Abstract

Graphitic-C3N4 nanosheets (CN)/ZnO photocatalysts (CN/ZnO) with different CN loadings were successfully prepared via a simple precipitation-calcination in the presence of exfoliated C3N4 nanosheets. Their morphology and structure were thoroughly characterized by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and photoluminescence spectra (PL). The results showed that hexagonal wurzite-phase ZnO nanoparticles were randomly distributed onto the CN nanosheets with a well-bonded interface between the two components in the CN/ZnO composites. The performance of the photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction indicated that CN/ZnO exhibited better photocatalytic activity than pure ZnO under visible-light irradiation and the photocatalyst composite with a lower loading of CN sheets eventually displayed higher activity. The enhanced performance of CN/ZnO photocatalysts could be ascribed to the increased absorption of the visible light and the effective transfer and separation of the photogenerated charge carriers.

Keywords: photoreduction, aqueous Chromium(VI), graphitic C3N4 nanosheets, ZnO, visible light

1. Introduction

Hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) is the most toxic of the chromium species and has been listed as one of the priority pollutants by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) due to its notoriously toxic, mutagenic and carcinogenic activity to human beings [1,2]. Until now, a number of techniques have been developed for Cr(VI) elimination from waste water, such as chemical precipitation, reverse osmosis, ion exchange, foam flotation, electrolysis, adsorption, and photocatalytic reduction [3,4]. Among them, photocatalytic reduction is an efficient, active, and clean technology for Cr(VI) removal because of its acceptable cost and easy operation as well as the inexhaustible solar energy [5,6,7].

Among the oxide-based photocatalysts, ZnO has been widely studied for environmental remediation and is believed to be an alternative photocatalyst to TiO2 due to their similar band-gaps and similar photocatalytic mechanisms [8,9]. Some research about Cr(VI) photoreduction activity using ZnO photocatalysts has also been reported [10,11,12,13]. However, the high recombination of photoinduced electron-hole pairs, poor response to visible light and photocorrosion have hindered the application of ZnO in photocatalysis [14,15]. One of the effective strategies to improve the charge carrier separation and the visible-light harvesting of ZnO-based photocatalysts is to couple ZnO with narrow-band-gap semiconductors [16,17,18,19,20,21]. So far, a variety of semiconductors with narrow band-gaps including C3N4, Bi2O3, BiOI, V2O5, CdS, etc., have been used as sensitizers to design visible-light–driven ZnO-based composite photocatalysts. Coupling ZnO with the visible-light sensitizer not only enhances the light harvesting, but also facilitates charge separation in the photoexcited electron-hole pairs. The key to achieve the desired coupling effects is a good interface connection between two semiconductors with well-developed structures so that charge transfer can proceed smoothly across the interface [16,22].

Recently, graphite-like carbon nitride (g-C3N4), a metal-free layered polymer semiconductor, exhibited excellent photocatalytic activities toward many organic pollutants under visible-light irradiation and has attracted plenty of attention due to its appropriate band structure and visible-light adsorption ability as well as its excellent chemical stability and ease of large-scale preparation using various precursors [23,24,25,26,27,28]. Recent research about the exfoliated g-C3N4 shows that ultrathin g-C3N4 nanosheets (CN) do exhibit many superior properties to its bulk analogy [29,30,31,32,33], very similar to hotspot graphene [34,35]. Although there has been some work recently reported about the g-C3N4/ZnO composites [16,17,36,37,38,39,40,41], which is mainly focused on the photocatalytic oxidation property, to our knowledge, few reports using CN as the substrate to fabricate nanocatalysts for water purification and coupling ZnO with CN has rarely been reported so far for Cr(VI) photoreduction. In this study, CN/ZnO photocatalysts with different CN loadings were successfully prepared via a simple precipitation-calcination in the presence of exfoliated C3N4 nanosheets. The photocatalysts were thoroughly characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) and photoluminescence spectra (PL) and their visible-light photocatalytic properties were evaluated by Cr(VI) photoreduction.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Charaterization of CN/ZnO Nanocomposites

Figure 1 illustrates the fabrication process and formation mechanism for CN/ZnO nanocomposites. Firstly, H2SO4-C3N4 prepared via H2SO4 intercalation into bulk graphitic C3N4 was exfoliated into ultrathin CN nanosheets with few layers with the aid of ultrasonification, which was confirmed in previous studies [29,33]. As demonstrated in previous reports [23,25], CN sheets have triazine units on the basal planes and amino groups located at the edges. These functional groups act as anchor sites and Zn2+ could be adsorbed onto the surfaces of CN nanosheets due to the Van der Waals force and the coordination interaction between the metal ions and the functional groups. Secondly, the nuclei of the Zn(HCO3)2 precursor were formed in a short time upon the addition of NH4HCO3 [42] and gradually grew onto CN nanosheets at relatively high temperature. Finally, high-temperature treatment of CN/Zn(HCO3)2 under an N2 atmosphere gave the product CN/ZnO.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

A schematic representation of the synthetic route to graphitic-C3N4 (g-C3N4) nanosheets (CN)/ZnO nanocomposites. CN: Graphitic-C3N4.

Figure 2 shows the XRD patterns of ZnO, C3N4 and CN-ZnO with different CN contents. For pure ZnO, the peaks at 31.7° (100), 34.4° (002), 36.2° (010), 47.3° (102), 56.5° (110), 62.7° (103) and 67.9° (112) matched well with the standard data of the ZnO hexagonal wurtzite phase (JCPDS No. 36-1451) [36] and no other ZnO crystallite phases in all the samples prepared herein were observed. Bulk g-C3N4 exhibited two peaks at 13.0° and 27.0° corresponding to the (100) and (002) crystal planes of g-C3N4, which were ascribed to the inter-planar stacking peak of aromatic systems and the in-plane structural packing motif, respectively [29,33]. No diffraction peaks of the crystalline g-C3N4 phase were detected in CN-2/ZnO with a lower content of CN, indicating CN nanosheets were totally exfoliated at lower loadings and uniformly dispersed in the CN-2/ZnO due to the effective prevention of the restacking of the CN layered by the ZnO particles, similar to other two dimensional (2D) lamellar material embedded in the composites [43,44,45]. With higher CN loadings, however, the as-prepared CN-10/ZnO samples exhibited a crystalline g-C3N4 peak, which was similar to recent reports [17]. Meanwhile, the ZnO crystal phase in the CN/ZnO composites was detected, which favored the photocatalytic properties of the as-prepared photocatalyst.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of ZnO, C3N4, CN-2/ZnO and CN-10/ZnO.

Figure 3 shows the typical SEM images of g-C3N4, H2SO4-C3N4, CN-2/ZnO and ZnO. g-C3N4 was composed of a large number of irregular aggregated particles about several micrometers in size and plenty of small pores resulting from gas discharged from the melamine decomposition could be detected in these particles (Figure 3a). After acid treatment, the H2SO4-C3N4 sample exhibited surface-smooth particles (Figure 3b). From Figure 3c,d, CN-2/ZnO exhibited an ordered sheet-like structure composed of aggregated spherical ZnO nanoparticles with a mean size of around 25 nm on the surface of the CN sheets, indicating that the CN sheets acted as the substrate for the formation of the ZnO precursor during the chemical precipitation process. Compared to the CN-2/ZnO nanocomposite, as seen from Figure 3e,f, pure ZnO displayed more disordered agglomerates composed of a larger diameter size (ca. 30–50 nm) and this phenomena was also found in graphene-based composites because the planar 2D material provided more substrates for the nuclei formation and the subsequent special confinement of the crystalline growth [46,47].

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (a) g-C3N4; (b) H2SO4-C3N4; (c,d) CN-2/ZnO; and (e,f) ZnO.

Figure 4 shows the typical HRTEM images of ZnO and CN-2/ZnO. The pure ZnO nanoparticles exhibited an irregular spherical morphology with a size diameter in the range of 20–100 nm (Figure 4a) and the lattice fringes were measured to be 0.26 nm (Figure 4b), which could be assigned to the (002) facets of the hexagonal wurtzite ZnO phase [36]. From Figure 4c–e, it was seen that ZnO nanoparticles were randomly and densely distributed on the surface of the CN sheets and showed a smaller particle size compared to that of pure ZnO. Two different kinds of lattice fringes were clearly exhibited (Figure 4f), one of d = 0.31 nm matching the (002) crystallographic plane of C3N4 [33], the other of d = 0.255 nm identical to the pure wurtzite ZnO nanoparticles as presented in Figure 4b, further indicating that the prepared sample consisted of CN and ZnO and the CN did not destroy the ZnO crystalline structure in our synthetic process. Moreover, the junction interface between the CN and ZnO phase in the composite was easily detected from Figure 4f, where the CN sheets acted as bridges for the connection between the ZnO nanoparticles, and consequently the CN sheets were densely decorated by the ZnO nanoparticles. The close connection between the two components was favorable for the increased separation of photogenerated carriers and would enhance the photocatalytic performance of the photocatalysts.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

High-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) images of (a,b) ZnO; and (c–f) CN-2/ZnO.

Figure 5 provides the XPS survey spectra and Zn2p of the CN-2/ZnO composite and the ZnO as well as high-resolution C1s and N1s spectra for the CN-2/ZnO composite. The survey spectrum in Figure 5a clearly indicated that the composition of CN-2/ZnO included Zn, O, C and N elements. The peak located at 531.0 eV was associated with the O2− ions in the ZnO [48]. The Zn2p spectrum of pure ZnO (Figure 5b) exhibits two peaks at 1021.2 eV and 1044.3 eV assigned to Zn2p3/2 and Zn2p1/2, respectively, which were consistent with the typical binding energy of Zn2+ in the ZnO [49,50]. However, the binding energies of Zn2p3/2 and Zn2p1/2 for the CN-2/ZnO composite were 1021.6 and 1044.8 eV, slightly higher than those for pure ZnO. Such a chemical shift of the Zn2p spectrum in the CN/ZnO composite could be ascribed to the formation of the N–Zn bonds [36,50]. The C1s spectra showed three deconvoluted peaks located at 284.6, 286.3 and 288.9 eV. The peak at 284.6 eV was exclusively assigned to surface adventitious carbon while the peaks at 286.3 and 288.9 eV were attributed to the sp2-hybridized carbon bonded to N inside the triazine rings and bonded to the –NH2 group, respectively [51]. The high-resolution N1s spectrum of CN-2/ZnO could be fitted into three different peaks. The main signals at 398.0 and 399.8 eV were assigned to the sp2-bonded N atoms in the triazine rings and the bridging N atoms in the N–(C)3 groups [29,51], while the weak peak associated with terminal amino functions exhibited much higher binding energy at 407.3 eV, probably due to the formation of the Zn–N bonds in the composite material [36,40,49].

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) survey spectra and (b) Zn2p peaks of CN-2/ZnO composite and ZnO; (c) high-resolution C1s and (d) N1s spectra for CN-2/ZnO composite.

The UV-Vis DRS spectra of g-C3N4, ZnO and different mass ratios of the CN/ZnO photocatalysts are shown in Figure 6. As expected, a sharp fundamental absorption edge for ZnO rose at ca. 400 nm, attributable to the 3.11 eV bandgap. The main absorption edge of the pure g-C3N4 occurred at ca. 470 nm, corresponding to a typical band-gap of 2.63 eV. Compared with pure ZnO, the absorption wavelength range of both CN-2/ZnO and CN-10/ZnO extended towards the visible-light region and the absorption intensity also increased, which demonstrated the effective surface coupling of ZnO with CN sheets and therefore an improved photocatalytic activity of the prepared photocatalysts could be expected under visible-light irradiation. The red-shifted absorption of the composites in the visible-light region was clearly enhanced with the increasing CN amount. These results implied that well-bonded interfaces between the CN nanosheets and ZnO phase could be formed [36,40] and thus make CN/ZnO photocatalysts shift to the lower energy region.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of g-C3N4, ZnO, CN-2/ZnO and CN-10/ZnO photocatalysts.

PL spectral analysis was conducted to demonstrate the migration, transfer, and recombination processes of photoinduced electron-hole pairs in the photoinduced system. Figure 7 shows PL spectra of the g-C3N4, ZnO and CN/ZnO photocatalysts. A main strong emission peak at 498 nm and a shoulder-peak at around 417 nm for pure ZnO were observed, which was consistent with other reports [40,52]. The peak at 463 nm of the bulk g-C3N4 was almost not detected in the CN/ZnO composites due to the low content of CN. Compared to pure ZnO, the PL peak intensity at 498 nm for both CN/ZnO photocatalysts was significantly reduced, indicating that the modification of ZnO with few-layered CN nanosheets could effectively suppress the recombination of photoinduced electron-hole pairs in the composites and thus efficiently separate the photoinduced electrons in electron-transfer processes [53,54]. Combined with the enhanced absorption in the visible-light region presented in the UV-DRS analysis, therefore, the incorporation of CN nanosheets into ZnO was greatly expected to enhance the photocatalytic performance of the CN/ZnO composites under visible-light irradiation.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

Photoluminescence spectra (PL) spectra of g-C3N4, ZnO and CN/ZnO photocatalysts. The inset shows the PL spectra of ZnO, CN-2/ZnO and CN-10/ZnO composites.

2.2. Photocatalytic Reduction of Aqueous Chromium(VI) under Visible Light

Figure 8 presents the photocatalytic reduction of aqueous Cr(VI) over the g-C3N4, ZnO and CN/ZnO photocatalysts under visible light. The control experiments indicated that aqueous Cr(VI) was very stable under visible light (blank experiments) and the adsorption removal ratio of aqueous Cr(VI) was negligible (about 4%) for the CN-ZnO composites (dark experiments). The photoreduction rate of aqueous Cr(VI) was 18% and 34% for pure g-C3N4 and ZnO under 240 min irradiation. However, after some CN nanosheets were incorporated into the ZnO, the reduction rate of the Cr(VI) was increased to 70% and 47% for CN-2/ZnO and CN-10/ZnO, strongly suggesting that the modification with CN nanosheets could greatly enhance the photocatalytic reduction activity of CN/ZnO composites. Compared to other C3N4- [55,56] and ZnO-based photocatalysts for visible-light-driven Cr(VI) photoreduction [42,57], the CN/ZnO prepared herein showed enhanced photoreduction activity, indicating that modification with CN was effective for improving the photo-activity of ZnO. Furthermore, the lower loading of the CN content for CN-2/ZnO exhibited better activity than that for CN-10/ZnO and this was because the excess CN nanosheets may act as a recombination center, covering the active sites on the surface of ZnO particles and therefore reducing the efficiency of charge separation.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

Photoreduction of aqueous Cr(VI) over g-C3N4, ZnO and CN/ZnO photocatalysts under visible light. C0 and C are the initial concentration and solution concentration of scheduled irradiation intervals.

The photostability of the CN-2/ZnO in the circulating runs for the photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) under visible-light irradiation was further examined (Figure 9). After 240 min of irradiation in each cycle, the photocatalyst was separated from the aqueous suspension by centrifugation and washed with deionized (DI) water. As shown in Figure 9, there was no significant decrease of the photocatalytic activity after five cycles. Compared to the recycled property reported by Wang [17], where bulk g-C3N4/ZnO showed dramatically reduced activity in the first cycle of Cr(VI) photoreduction, apparently the CN/ZnO composite had good photostability and chemical stability under the studied conditions, indicating that the photocorrosion effect of ZnO was effectively suppressed by CN hybridization [14,58]. The improved photoreduction activity could be ascribed to the increased absorption in the visible-light range and the enhanced charge separation efficiency at the interface of ZnO and CN nanosheets [16,36]. Furthermore, compared to those reports where better activities were obtained with the use of additional scavengers [11,55,57,59], this method described herein will be highly desirable for environmental remediation due to no additional scavengers in this process.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

Cycling runs for the photoreduction of Cr(VI) by CN-2/ZnO composite under visible light.

On the basis of the above results presented in this work, a synergistic mechanism between ZnO and CN nanosheets for the improved photoreduction of Cr(VI) is proposed as illustrated in Figure 10. Under visible-light irradiation, both CN sheets and ZnO can be excited and produce photogenerated electron-hole pairs. Since the conduction band (CB) edge of C3N4 (−1.12 eV) [60] is more negative than that of ZnO (−0.5 eV) [58], the photogenerated electrons on the surface of CN sheets can readily transfer to the CB of ZnO via the well-developed interface and thus reduce Cr2O72− to Cr3+ on the surface of the ZnO particles and the holes oxidize water to form O2, as illustrated in the following equations [61]. As depicted in Figure 10, this transfer favors electron-hole separation and leads to large numbers of electrons on the ZnO surface and holes on the g-C3N4 surface, respectively, thus promoting the photocatalytic reduction of aqueous Cr(VI).

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Schematic illustration of the mechanism of electron-hole separation and transport and photocatalytic activity of CN/ZnO photocatalyst under visible-light irradiation.

Cr2O72− + 14H+ + 6e → 2Cr3+ + 7H2O (1)
2H2O + 4h+ → O2 + 4H+ (2)

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Preparation of H2SO4-Intercalated C3N4 (H2SO4-C3N4)

All chemicals were used as received with any purification. The bulk g-C3N4 was prepared by direct pyrolysis thermal polycondensation of melamine in the semi-closed system. In a typical synthesis, 10 g of melamine was placed in an alumina crucible with a cover and then heated to 550 °C with a heating rate of 3 °C·min−1, and kept at this temperature for 4 h in static air.

The grey-white H2SO4-C3N4 was obtained by stirring bulk g-C3N4 powder in concentrated H2SO4 (98%) at room temperature as described in our previous report [33]. Briefly, the as-prepared yellow C3N4 powder (1.0 g) was mixed with concentrated H2SO4 (10 mL) and stirred for 8 h at room temperature for its intercalation, during which the solution color changed from yellow to grey. Then the mixture was slowly poured into deionized water (200 mL). The obtained light-grey suspension was filtrated, washed repeatedly with DI water to remove the residual acid and finally freeze-dried under vacuum to give the grey-white H2SO4-C3N4. The H2SO4 content in this sample was estimated to 30% by thermal analysis.

3.2. Preparation of CN/ZnO Nanocomposites

CN/ZnO nanocomposites with different theoretical content of C3N4 (2% and 10%) and pure ZnO nanoparticles used in this work were prepared by a reaction similar to that described by Pan [62]. In brief, H2SO4-C3N4 (60 mg) was ultrasonicated in DI water (100 mL) for 5 h to give homogeneous colloidal suspension containing large amount of ultrathin few-layered CN nanosheets [29,33]. Then ZnSO4·7H2O (6.9 g) was added and ultrasonicated for another 30 min to ensure the uniform adsorption of Zn2+ onto the surface of CN nanosheets. Aqueous solution (100 mL) containing NH4HCO3 (2.9 g) was added dropwise into the above solution at 60 °C within 10 min and this mixture solution was kept stirring at this temperature for 3 h, during which a lot of pungent NH3 was produced. The white precipitate (CN/Zn(HCO3)2) was collected by filtration, washed for three times with distilled water and then dried in vacuum oven at 60 °C for 24 h. Finally, this product was calcined at 550 °C for 2 h under N2 atmosphere to obtain the grew-yellow powder CN/ZnO nanocomposites with 2% theoretical content of CN. The as-synthesized CN/ZnO samples with 2.0% and 10% theoretical CN content were named as CN-2/ZnO and CN-10/ZnO. For comparison, pure ZnO was prepared with the same procedure without the use of H2SO4-C3N4.

3.3. Characterization

SEM images were obtained with a Hitachi SU8020 scanning electron microscope (Hitachi Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) with acceleration voltage of 20 kV. HRTEM was performed on a FEI Tecnai G2 F20 field-emission transmission electron microscopy (Hillsboro, OR, USA) at an accelerating voltage of 200 kV. XRD were recorded on a PANalytical X’pert Pro powder diffractometer (Almelo, The Netherland) with Cu-Ka radiation (λ = 1.5418 Å) with a scan step of 0.013°. XPS measurements were performed on a Thermo Fisher ESCALAB 250Xi photoelectron spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA) using monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source (hv = 1486.6 eV). DRS was carried out on a Shimadzu UV-2450 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan) using BaSO4 as the reference sample. PL was measured with a Hitachi F-7000 fluorescence spectrophotometer (Tokyo, Japan) using a Xe lamp as excitation source with optical filters.

3.4. Photocatalytic Tests

The photocatalytic reduction of aqueous Cr(VI) were carried out in a homemade photochemical reactor under visible-light irradiation. The visible-light source was provided by a 500 W Xe lamp with maximum wavelength emission at 470 nm (Shanghai Jiguang Special Lighting Factory, Shanghai, China). The lamp source was laid in the empty chamber of the annular quartz condensing tube with a circulating water jacket outside to immediately remove the heat released from the lamp. The distance between the light source and the tube containing the reaction mixture was set to be 15 cm. In each experiment, the photocatalyst (50 mg) was dispersed in 50 mL aqueous Cr(VI) solutions of different concentrations. Prior to irradiation, the mixture solution was magnetically stirred for 60 min in the dark to establish the adsorption-desorption equilibrium. During the irradiation, 4 mL of the reaction solution was withdrawn at certain time intervals and centrifuged to remove the photocatalyst from the solution. The Cr(VI) content in the supernatant solution was determined spectrophotometrically at 540 nm using the diphenylcarbazide method [41] (Evolution 600 UV-Vis spectrophotometer, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

4. Conclusions

In summary, CN/ZnO photocatalysts were successfully prepared via a facile precipitation-calcination in the presence of exfoliated C3N4 nanosheets. A well-bonded interface was formed between ZnO and CN nanosheets in the as-prepared photocatalysts. CN/ZnO exhibited better photocatalytic Cr(VI) reduction activity than pure ZnO under visible-light irradiation. The enhanced photoreduction performance of the CN/ZnO photocatalyst was be ascribed to the increased absorption of the visible light and the effective transfer and separation of the photogenerated charge carriers at the interface. The CN/ZnO photocatalyst prepared herein is being further evaluated by removing other pollutants and has great potential in water remediation.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to gratefully acknowledge the financial supports from the National Science Foundation of China (No. 51402030) and the Municipal Science Foundation Project of CQEC (No. KJ110421) and the Natural Science Foundation Project of CQ CSTC (cstcjjA50016).

Author Contributions

X.Y. conceived and designed the experiments; Q.Y. performed the experiments; X.Y. and C.Z. analyzed the data; Q.T., Y.M. and A.-k.D. contributed partial reagents and materials. X.Y. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Langard S. Chromium carcinogenicity: A review of experimental animal data. Sci. Total Environ. 1988;71:341–350. doi: 10.1016/0048-9697(88)90206-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Katz S.A., Salem H. The toxicology of chromium with respect to its chemical speciation: A review. J. Appl. Toxicol. 1993;13:217–224. doi: 10.1002/jat.2550130314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Barrera-Diaz C.E., Lugo-Lugo V., Bilyeu B. A review of chemical, electrochemical and biological methods for aqueous Cr(VI) reduction. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012;223:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kabra K., Chaudhary R., Sawhney R. Treatment of hazardous organic and inorganic compounds through aqueous phase photocatalysis: A review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004;43:7683–7696. doi: 10.1021/ie0498551. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Daghrir R., Drogui P., Robert D. Modified TiO2 for environmental photocatalytic applications: A review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2013;52:3581–3599. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jing L., Zhou W., Tian G., Fu H. Surface tuning for oxide-based nanomaterials as efficient photocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013;42:9509–9549. doi: 10.1039/c3cs60176e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang Y., Jiang L., Feng C. Photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) Prog. Chem. 2013;25:1999–2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hernandez-Alonso M.D., Fresno F., Sareza S., Coronado J.M. Development of alternative photocatalysts to TiO2: Challenges and opportunities. Energy Environ. Sci. 2009;2:1231–1257. doi: 10.1039/b907933e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang H., Chen G., Bahnemann D. Photoelectrocatalytic materials for environmental applications. J. Mater. Chem. 2009;19:5089–5121. doi: 10.1039/b821991e. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Khalil L.B., Mourad W.E., Rophae M.W. Photocatalytic reduction of environmental pollutant Cr(VI) over some semiconductors under UV/visible light illumination. Appl. Catal. B. 1998;17:267–273. doi: 10.1016/S0926-3373(98)00020-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jin Z., Zhang Y.X., Meng F.L., Jia Y., Luo T., Yu X.Y., Wang J., Liu J.H., Huang X.J. Facile synthesis of porous single crystalline ZnO nanoplates and their application in photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) in the presence of phenol. J. Hazard. Mater. 2014;276:400–407. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.05.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chakrabarti S., Chaudhuri B., Bhattacharjee S., Ray A.K., Dutta B.K. Photo-reduction of hexavalent chromium in aqueous solution in the presence of zinc oxide as semiconductor catalyst. Chem. Eng. J. 2009;153:86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2009.06.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Qamar M., Gondal M.A., Yamani Z.H. Laser-induced efficient reduction of Cr(VI) catalyzed by ZnO nanoparticles. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;187:258–263. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Van Dijken A., Janssen A.H., Smitsmans M.H.P., Vanmaekelbergh D., Meijerink A. Size-selective photoetching of nanocrystalline semiconductor particles. Chem. Mater. 1998;10:3513–3522. doi: 10.1021/cm980715p. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Daneshvar N., Salari D., Khataee A.R. Photocatalytic degradation of azo dye acid red 14 in water on ZnO as an alternative catalyst to TiO2. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A. 2004;162:317–322. doi: 10.1016/S1010-6030(03)00378-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang Y., Shi R., Lin J., Zhu Y. Enhancement of photocurrent and photocatalytic activity of ZnO hybridized with graphite like C3N4. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011;4:2922–2929. doi: 10.1039/c0ee00825g. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu W., Wang M., Xu C., Chen S. Facile synthesis of g-C3N4/ZnO composite with enhanced visible light photooxidation and photoreduction properties. Chem. Eng. J. 2012;209:386–393. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Balachandran S., Swaminathan M. Facile fabrication of heterostructured Bi2O3-ZnO photocatalyst and its enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2012;116:26306–26312. doi: 10.1021/jp306874z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Jiang J., Zhang X., Sun P.B., Zhang L.Z. ZnO/BiOI heterostructures: Photoinduced charge-transfer property and enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2011;115:20555–20564. doi: 10.1021/jp205925z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zou C.W., Rao Y.F., Alyamani A., Chu W., Chen M.J., Patterson D.A., Emanuelsson E.A.C., Gao W. Heterogeneous lollipop-like V2O5/ZnO array: A promising composite nanostructure for visible light photocatalysis. Langmuir. 2010;26:11615–11620. doi: 10.1021/la101324e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Wang X.W., Yin L.C., Liu G., Wang L.Z., Saito R., Lu G.Q., Cheng H.-M. Polar interface-induced improvement in high photocatalytic hydrogen evolution over ZnO-CdS heterostructures. Energy Environ. Sci. 2011;4:3976–3979. doi: 10.1039/c0ee00723d. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen X.B., Shen S.H., Guo L.J., Mao S.S. Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:6503–6570. doi: 10.1021/cr1001645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang Y., Wang X., Antonietti M. Polymeric graphitic carbon nitride as a heterogeneous organocatalyst: From photochemistry to multipurpose catalysis to sustainable chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:68–89. doi: 10.1002/anie.201101182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhao Z., Sun Y., Dong F. Graphitic carbon nitride based nanocomposites: A review. Nanoscale. 2015;7:15–37. doi: 10.1039/C4NR03008G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Cao S., Low J., Yu J., Jaroniec M. Polymeric photocatalysts based on graphitic carbon nitride. Adv. Mater. 2015;27:2150–2176. doi: 10.1002/adma.201500033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zheng Y., Lin L., Wang B., Wang X. Graphitic carbon nitride polymers toward sustainable photoredox catalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:12868–12884. doi: 10.1002/anie.201501788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Dong F., Wu L., Sun Y., Fu M., Wu Z., Lee S.C. Efficient synthesis of polymeric g-C3N4 layered materials as novel efficient visible light driven photocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. 2011;21:15171–15174. doi: 10.1039/c1jm12844b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu J., Zhang Y., Lu L., Wu G., Chen W. Self-regenerated solar-driven photocatalytic water-splitting by urea derived graphitic carbon nitride with platinum nanoparticles. Chem. Commun. 2012;48:8826–8828. doi: 10.1039/c2cc33644h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Xu J., Zhang L., Shi R., Zhu Y. Chemical exfoliation of graphitic carbon nitride for efficient heterogeneous photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2013;1:14766–14772. doi: 10.1039/c3ta13188b. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhao H., Yu H., Quan X., Chen S., Zhao H., Wang H. Atomic single layer graphitic-C3N4: Fabrication and its high photocatalytic performance under visible light irradiation. RSC Adv. 2014;4:624–628. doi: 10.1039/C3RA45776A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Niu P., Zhang L., Liu G., Cheng H.M. Graphene-like carbon nitride nanosheets for improved photocatalytic activities. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012;22:4763–4770. doi: 10.1002/adfm.201200922. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Han Q., Zhao F., Hu C., Lv L., Zhang Z., Chen N., Qu L. Facile production of ultrathin graphitic carbon nitride nanoplatelets for efficient visible-light water splitting. Nano Res. 2015;8:1718–1728. doi: 10.1007/s12274-014-0675-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yuan X., Zhou C., Jin Y., Jing Q., Yang Y., Shen X., Tang Q., Mu Y., Du A.K. Facile synthesis of 3D porous thermally exfoliated g-C3N4 nanosheet with enhanced photocatalytic degradation of organic dye. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016;468:211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.01.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Geim A.K. Graphene: Status and prospects. Science. 2009;324:1530–1534. doi: 10.1126/science.1158877. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Guo S., Dong S. Graphene nanosheet: Synthesis, molecular engineering, thin film, hybrids, and energy and analytical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011;40:2644–2672. doi: 10.1039/c0cs00079e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sun J.X., Yuan Y.P., Qiu L.G., Jiang X., Xie A.J., Shen Y.H., Zhu J.F. Fabrication of composite photocatalyst g-C3N4-ZnO and enhancement of photocatalytic activity under visible light. Dalton Trans. 2012;41:6756–6763. doi: 10.1039/c2dt12474b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhou J., Zhang M., Zhu Y. Preparation of visible light-driven g-C3N4@ZnO hybrid photocatalyst via mechanochemistry. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2014;16:17627–17633. doi: 10.1039/C4CP02061H. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Li X., Li M., Yang J., Li X., Hu T., Wang J., Sui Y., Wu X., Kong L. Synergistic effect of efficient adsorptiong-C3N4/ZnO composite for photocatalytic property. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2014;75:441–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jpcs.2013.12.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Liu W., Wang M., Xu C., Chen S., Fu X. Significantly enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity of g-C3N4 via ZnO modification and the mechanism study. J. Mol. Catal. A. 2013;368–369:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.molcata.2012.11.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Jo W.K., Selvam N.C.S. Enhanced visible light-driven photocatalytic performance of ZnO-g-C3N4 coupled with graphene oxide as a novel ternary nanocomposite. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015;299:462–470. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yuan X., Wang Y., Wang J., Zhou C., Tang Q., Rao X. Calcined graphene/MgAl-layered double hydroxides for enhanced Cr(VI) removal. Chem. Eng. J. 2013;221:204–213. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2013.01.090. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yang G.C.C., Chan S.W. Photocatalytic reduction of Chromium(VI) in aqueous solution using dye-sensitized nanoscale ZnO under visible light irradiation. J. Nanopart. Res. 2009;11:221–230. doi: 10.1007/s11051-008-9423-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rafiee M.A., Rafiee J., Wang Z., Song H., Yu Z., Koratkar N. Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. Acsnano. 2009;3:3884–3890. doi: 10.1021/nn9010472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Liang J., Huang Y., Zhang L., Wang Y., Ma Y., Guo T., Chen Y. Molecular-level dispersion of graphene into poly(vinyl alcohol) and effective reinforcement of their nanocomposites. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009;19:2297–2302. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200801776. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Manias E., Touny A., Wu L., Strawhecker K., Lu B., Chung T.C. Polypropylene/Montmorillonite Nanocomposites: Review of the Synthetic Routes and Materials Properties. Chem. Mater. 2001;13:3516–3523. doi: 10.1021/cm0110627. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Gao Z., Wang J., Li Z., Yang W., Wang B., Hou M., He Y., Liu Q., Mann T., Yang P., et al. Graphene nanosheet/Ni2+/Al3+ layered double-hydroxide composite as a novel electrode for a supercapacitor. Chem. Mater. 2011;23:3509–3516. doi: 10.1021/cm200975x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhang L., Zhang X., Shen L., Gao B., Hao L., Lu X., Zhang F., Ding B., Yuan C. Enhanced high-current capacitive behavior of graphene/CoAl-layered double hydroxide composites as electrode material for supercapacitors. J. Power Sources. 2012;199:395–401. doi: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.10.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Deng Z.W., Chen M., Gu G.X., Wu L.M. A facile method to fabricate ZnO hollow spheres and their photocatalytic property. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2008;112:16–22. doi: 10.1021/jp077662w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Futsuhara M., Yoshioka K., Takai O. Structural, electrical and optical properties of zinc nitride thin films prepared by reactive rf magnetron sputtering. Thin Solid Films. 1998;322:274–281. doi: 10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00910-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Chen S., Wei Z., Zhang S., Liu W. Preparation, characterization and photocatalytic activity of N-containing ZnO powder. Chem. Eng. J. 2009;148:263–269. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Zhou Z., Wang J., Yu J., Shen Y., Li Y., Liu A., Liu S., Zhang Y. Dissolution and liquid crystals phase of 2D polymeric carbon nitride. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:2179–2182. doi: 10.1021/ja512179x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Chen C., Amini A., Zhu C., Xu Z., Song H., Wang N. Enhanced photocatalytic performance of TiO2-ZnO hybrid nanostructures. Sci. Rep. 2014;4 doi: 10.1038/srep04181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Hotchandani S., Kamat P.V. Charge-transfer processes in coupled semiconductor systems: Photochemistry and photoelectrochemistry of the colloidal cadmium sulfide-zinc oxide system. J. Phys. Chem. 1992;96:6834–6839. doi: 10.1021/j100195a056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Robel I., Bunker B., Kamat P.V. Single-walled carbon nanotube-CdS nanocomposites as light-harvesting assemblies: Photoinduced charge-transfer interactions. Adv. Mater. 2005;17:2458–2463. doi: 10.1002/adma.200500418. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhang Y., Zhang Q., Shi Q., Cai Z., Yang Z. Acid-treated g-C3N4 with improved photocatalytic performance in the reduction of aqueous Cr(VI) under visible-light. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015;142:251–257. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2014.12.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dong G., Zhang L. Synthesis and enhanced Cr(VI) photoreduction property of formate anion containing graphitic carbon nitride. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2013;117:4062–4068. doi: 10.1021/jp3115226. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shirzad-Siboni M., Farrokhi M., Soltani R.D.C., Khataee A., Tajassosi S. Photocatalytic reduction of hexavalent Chromium over ZnO nanorods immobilized on Kaolin. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2014;53:1079–1087. doi: 10.1021/ie4032583. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Fu H., Xu T., Zhu S., Zhu Y. Photocorrosion inhibition and enhancement of photocatalytic activity for ZnO via hybridization with C60. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:8064–8069. doi: 10.1021/es801484x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wang L., Wang N., Zhu L., Yu H., Tang H. Photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI) over different TiO2 photocatalysts and the effects of dissolved organic species. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008;152:93–99. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2007.06.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wang X.C., Maeda K., Thomas A., Takanabe K., Xin G., Carlsson J.M., Domen K., Antonietti M. A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat. Mater. 2009;8:76–82. doi: 10.1038/nmat2317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yang Q.L., Kang S.Z., Chen H., Bu W., Mu J. La2Ti2O7: An efficient and stable photocatalyst for the photoreduction of Cr(VI) ions in water. Desalination. 2011;266:149–153. doi: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.08.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Liu X., Pan L., Zhao Q., Lv T., Zhu G., Chen T., Lu T., Sun Z., Sun C. UV-assisted photocatalytic synthesis of ZnO-reduced graphene oxide composites with enhanced photocatalytic activity in reduction of Cr(VI) Chem. Eng. J. 2012;183:238–243. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2011.12.068. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nanomaterials are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES