Abstract
Background
The Mount Huang eastern honey bees (Apis cerana) are an endemic population, which is well adapted to the local agricultural and ecological environment. In this study, the genetic structure of seven eastern honey bees (A. cerana) populations from Mount Huang in China were analyzed by SSR (simple sequence repeat) markers.
Results
The results revealed that 16 pairs of primers used amplified a total of 143 alleles. The number of alleles per locus ranged from 6 to 13, with a mean value of 8.94 alleles per locus. Observed and expected heterozygosities showed mean values of 0.446 and 0.831 respectively. UPGMA cluster analysis grouped seven eastern honey bees in three groups.
Conclusion
The results obtained show a high genetic diversity in the honey bee populations studied in Mount Huang, and high differentiation among all the populations, suggesting that scarce exchange of honey bee species happened in Mount Huang. Our study demonstrated that the Mount Huang honey bee populations still have a natural genome worth being protected for conservation.
Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s41065-016-0010-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Keywords: Apis cerana, Honey bee, Microsatellite, Mount huang, SSRs
Background
Mount Huang lies in the southern end of the Anhui province of China (Wannan), between 117°02′–118°55′ east longitude and 29°24′–30°24′ north latitude. It has a typical humid subtropical monsoon climate, luxuriantly diverse flora and fauna, including honey bees. The Mount Huang eastern honey bees (A. cerana) are an endemic population, which is well adapted to the local agricultural and ecological environment. They have a particularly strong foraging instinct and resistance to parasitic mites as well as American foulbrood. This endemic population was listed in the first directory of potential breeding stock for conservation in 2001. The A. cerana conservation document Wannan (Wan D/XM01-19-87) was published according to ecological standards in Anhui province. However, since then, a massive replacement of the endemic honey bees has occurred, especially after the importation of Apis mellifera [1]. In some regions, this has resulted in almost complete replacement of endemic A. cerana populations with imported stocks.
Microsatellites are suitable nuclear markers used in population genetic studies in various taxonomic groups [2, 3]. This is due to their mass polymorphic loci, codominance, abundance throughout the genome, and relative ease of scoring [4]. The genetic structure of eastern honey bee populations from many regions of China have been analyzed using microsatellite markers. These regions mostly include areas in the middle east (Fujian, Jiangsu and Zhejiang provinces) and the south west (Tibei, Yunnan province and Hainan province). Zhu et al. [5] used five microsatellite loci to analyze the genetic structure of six A. cerana populations from Fujian province, their results showed that the mean expected heterozygosities (He) of populations from most of regions in Fujian was 0.5171 . In another study, a significant difference in genetic structures was found among honey bees from six regions in Wuyi Mountain located in Fujian province, the mean He of the six different region population was range from 0.4525–0.5613 [6]. Using six microsatellite loci, Ji et al. [7] found higher population heterozygosity and abundant genetic diversity in Apis cerana as well as in Apis mellifera (western European honey bee) populations in Jiangsu province, they found the mean He of A. cerana population in this province was 0.4424. Cao et al. [8] analyzed the genetic structure of more than ten A. cerana populations from different regions in Zhejiang province, their results showed that the genetic diversity of A. cerana in Zhejiang was relatively low, with the mean He was 0.3179. Guo et al. [9] used 8 microsatellite markers found the A. cerana populations in Qinling-Data mountain areas has rich genetic polymorphism, with the mean He, number of alleles, polymorphism information content (PIC) were 0.6877, 7.71, 3.7488 respectively. Ji et al. [10] found significant differentiation among 20 A. cerana populations from geographically different regions in China using 21 microsatellite loci. 502 alleles were found, and the average value of He of 21 microsatellites was 0.8689. Additionally, the mean He of the populations from Wuding (Yunnan province), Hainan, Bomi Tibet was 0.695, 0.6641 and 0.562 respectively, revealing their relatively high genetic diversity. Genetic diversity of A. cerana populations from Lushui in Yunnan province was evaluated with 21 microsatellite markers. 121 alleles were found, and the mean number of effective alleles was 5.76, the average He and PIC of all loci were 0.6752 and 0.6192, respectively, these results indicated the high level of genetic diversity in Lushui [11]. Six A. cerana populations distributed in different geographic areas in the south west Yunnan province were also surveyed using 21 microsatellite loci. All populations showed high levels of heterozygosity except the population from Diqing, the average He of the total populations was 0.739, and a significant genetic differentiation was found among all six populations [12]. Taken together, the genetic variation of A. cerana populations is overall higher in the southwest of China than in the middle east of China.
However, information about genetic variation of A. cerana in Mount Huang of Anhui province, in south east China, is presently not available. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to examine the genetic structure of Mount Huang honey bee populations using microsatellite analyses. Our findings provide important information that can be used for effective management and conservation of A. cerana in Wannan.
Methods
Samples
Adult workers from 190 colonies were collected from seven locations covering the main bee keeping areas in Huangshan [13], south of Anhui province in China (Wannan). Over 25 colonies were obtained from Jing County (JC), Huangshan District (HSD), Qimen County (QMC), and Yi County (YC), whereas 30 colonies were collected from Jixi County (JXC), She County (SC) and Huizhou District (HZD). The distances between the locations are more than 10 km. Ten bees from each colony were subjected to genetic analysis. Honey bee samples were preserved in 95 % ethanol and kept at −20 °C until needed.
DNA extraction and microsatellites amplification
Total DNA was extracted from the thorax of each bee, following the method of Smith and Hagen [14], and the concentration was then estimated using ultraviolet spectrophotometer MV-2201. DNA was stored at −20 °C until needed. The primer sequences of these loci were as previously described by Solignac et al. [15]. The annealing temperature and the concentration of MgCl2 are listed in Table 1. The PCR conditions were as follow: one cycle at 95 °C for 5 min; 35 cycles of 95 °C for 45 s, 50–60 °C for 45 s, 72 °C for 60 s; and one cycle at 72 °C for 8 min. The PCR products were electrophoretically fractionated in 6% denaturating polyacrylamide gels and visualized by silver staining. The size of amplified microsatellites was measured using EDA20 Kodak imaging system (Eastman Kodak, USA).
Table 1.
Locus | Chromosome or linkage group | GenBank Accession number | Mg 2+ (mmol/L) | Annealing temperature (°C) |
---|---|---|---|---|
AP243 | ChrLG1 | AJ509466 | 2.2 | 57.5 |
A043 | ChrLG1 | AJ509256 | 1.5 | 55 |
AP274 | ChrLG3 | AJ509486 | 2.0 | 55.0 |
AT105 | ChrLG5 | AJ509553 | 2.2 | 56.5 |
A113 | ChrLG6 | AJ509290 | 2.0 | 58.2 |
A107 | ChrLG7 | AJ509287 | 2.0 | 57.0 |
A024d | ChrLG7 | AJ509241 | 2.0 | 57.0 |
A014 | ChrLG8 | AJ509239 | 2.0 | 55.6 |
A088 | ChrLG8 | AJ509283 | 1.6 | 58.0 |
A007 | ChrLG8 | AJ509236 | 2.0 | 55 |
AP033 | ChrLG10 | AJ509319 | 2.2 | 56.5 |
AP297 | ChrLG12 | AJ509499 | 1.0 | 54 |
A029 | ChrLG12 | AJ509245 | 1.2 | 58 |
A035 | ChrLG14 | AJ509251 | 2.0 | 53.4 |
A028 | ChrLG14 | AJ509244 | 2.0 | 55.0 |
AG005C | ChrLG16 | AJ509723 | 2.0 | 55.0 |
Statistical analyses
The number of alleles, allele frequencies, observed and expected heterozygosity (Ho and He) of each microsatellite locus were computed with Microsatellite-Toolkit software [16]. Genetic and genotypic differentiation tests were conducted among the 7 populations using GENEPOP 4.1. The exact test for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (HWE), genetic structure and gene flow (Nm) were calculated with GENEPOP 4.1 [17]. F-statistics between populations were calculated using the software FSTAT (v2.9.3) [18]. The significance level of multiple comparisons was calculated using the sequential Bonferroni procedure [19].
The number and frequency of alleles were used to obtain the Da genetic distance between each population. Population tree based on Da values was constructed using the neighbor-joining (NJ) algorithms and unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) using PHYLIP software package (version 3.69) [20].
Results
The locations where honey bee samples were collected were mentioned in Yu et al. [13]. The number and size of alleles, the value of Ho and He are listed in Additional file 1: Table S1. A total of 143 alleles were detected at 16 microsatellite loci. The overall parameters per population are shown in Additional file 1: Table S1. The gene diversity (the mean He) varied between 0.597 ± 0.109 in the HSD population and 0.71 ± 0.056 in the SC population, and mean observed heterozygosities between 0.398 ± 0.186 in HSD population and 0.495 ± 0.235 in JC population. The observed heterozygosity (Ho) was relatively high in all populations except that of JC at loci A035, and HSD population at loci A107. The mean number of alleles for each population ranged from 2.936 ± 0.853 in HSD to 6.438 ± 1.632 in SC population.
We detected significant deviations (P < 0.05) from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in 86 out of 112 population-locus combination and all deviations were in favor of homozygotes (Table 2). Both genic and genotypic differentiation tests showed highly significant (P < 0.0001) differentiation among all populations. Multilocus FIS values varied between 0.181 (A029) and 0.618 (A088), while the FIT values varied from 0.314 (A028) to 0.701 (AP297). A high heterozygote deficiency within populations and the total population were revealed by positive FIS and FIT (Table 3). The value of FST for the total populations was 0.171, all loci contributed significantly to the differentiation (P < 0.001).
Table 2.
locus | P value | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JC | HSD | JXC | YC | QMC | SC | HZD | |
AP243 | 0.4447 | 0.2713 | 0 | 0.0087 | 0.2283 | 0.0084 | 0.0034 |
A043 | 0.0001 | 0.0046 | 0 | 0 | 0.3076 | 0 | 0.0008 |
AP274 | 0.0003 | 0.0995 | 0.001 | 0.0058 | 0.2845 | 0 | 0.0017 |
AT105 | 0.003 | 0.3695 | 0.0002 | 0.071 | 0.0716 | 0 | 0.0813 |
A113 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0023 | 0.0725 | 0 | 0.0025 |
A107 | 0.1234 | 0 | 0.1747 | 0.322 | 0.0402 | 0 | 0.7541 |
A024d | 0.0001 | 0 | 0.0019 | 0.0027 | 0.0106 | 0 | 0.0009 |
A014 | 0.0001 | 0.0092 | 0 | 0.0117 | 0 | 0.0004 | 0 |
A088 | 0.0115 | 0.0001 | 0 | 0 | 0.0001 | 0 | 0 |
AP033 | 1 | 0.0025 | 0.0029 | 0.0034 | 0.0057 | 0.007 | 0.2327 |
AP297 | 0.0052 | 0.7253 | 0 | 0 | 0.0018 | 0.0001 | 0 |
A029 | 0.0243 | 0.9913 | 0.0195 | 0.8768 | 0.9816 | 0.1932 | 0 |
A007 | 0.0148 | 0.0001 | 0.0033 | 0.001 | 0.0027 | 0 | 0 |
A035 | 0 | 0.9728 | 0 | 0.101 | 0.0111 | 0 | 0.0026 |
A028 | 0.3279 | 0.0358 | 0.309 | 0.0004 | 0 | 0 | 0.0008 |
AG005C | 0.0009 | 0 | 0.0014 | 0.0023 | 0.2447 | 0 | 0.0012 |
Table 3.
Locus | F IT | F ST | F IS |
---|---|---|---|
AP243 | 0.361*** | 0.108*** | 0.283*** |
A043 | 0.631*** | 0.203*** | 0.541*** |
AP274 | 0.453*** | 0.131*** | 0.372*** |
AT105 | 0.390*** | 0.134*** | 0.295*** |
A113 | 0.361*** | 0.126*** | 0.268*** |
A107 | 0.360*** | 0.198*** | 0.200*** |
A024d | 0.527*** | 0.110*** | 0.470*** |
A014 | 0.568*** | 0.170*** | 0.479*** |
A088 | 0.681*** | 0.166*** | 0.618*** |
AP033 | 0.349*** | 0.181*** | 0.208*** |
AP297 | 0.701*** | 0.268*** | 0.589*** |
A029 | 0.404*** | 0.272*** | 0.181*** |
A007 | 0.444*** | 0.077*** | 0.398*** |
A035 | 0.604*** | 0.277*** | 0.458*** |
A028 | 0.314*** | 0.116*** | 0.225*** |
AG005C | 0.481*** | 0.150*** | 0.390*** |
Mean ± SD | 0.47 ± 0.032*** | 0.171 ± 0.016*** | 0.369 ± 0.035*** |
Note: Mean estimates from jack-knife over loci, standard deviations (SD) are given in parentheses; ***p < 0.001
Genetic distances between pairs of Mount Huang A. cerana, in the present study, were 0.2104-0.5027 (Table 4, lower triangle). The pairwise Nm value (Table 4, upper triangle) between populations varied between 0.6049 (SC and JXC) and 0.8345 (YC and HSD). The neighbor-joining tree (Fig. 1) was constructed according to the Da genetic distance between each pair of populations. The SC population formed a group separating from other populations. JXC and HZD formed a cluster, JC, HSD, YC and QMC grouped together.
Table 4.
Population | JX | HSQ | JXX | YX | QMX | SX | HZQ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JX | ––––– | 0.7812 | 0.7326 | 0.8103 | 0.7714 | 0.6623 | 0.7503 |
HSQ | 0.2469 | ––––– | 0.6594 | 0.8345 | 0.6827 | 0.6053 | 0.6148 |
JXX | 0.3112 | 0.4164 | ––––– | 0.7201 | 0.6678 | 0.6049 | 0.7016 |
YX | 0.2104 | 0.1809 | 0.3284 | ––––– | 0.8050 | 0.6749 | 0.7239 |
QMX | 0.2595 | 0.3817 | 0.4038 | 0.2169 | ––––– | 0.6335 | 0.6568 |
SX | 0.4120 | 0.5020 | 0.5027 | 0.3932 | 0.4565 | ––––– | 0.6456 |
HZQ | 0.2872 | 0.4864 | 0.3544 | 0.3231 | 0.4204 | 0.4375 | ––––– |
The line means blank. There is no genetic distance between the same populations
Discussion
Population differentiation was detected in Mount Huangshan A. cerana through analysis of microsatellite polymorphism. There are limited population genetic studies of Mount Huangshan A. cerana, using microsatellite analysis. A previous study by Yu et al. [13], using morphometric analysis reported similar finding. Therefore, our study adds to the knowledge of the genetic changes that may be occurring in this important endemic honey bee population. This knowledge can be used for genetic management and conservation efforts, for the preservation of this population, which was first listed in the directory of potential breeding stock for conservation in 2001. The pure A. cerana population has several desirable advantages biological features, including disease resistance and the ability to get rid of bee mites from colonies. To date, other studies of A. cerana by microsatellite loci have focused on the eastern and southern populations of China. According to those reports, the expected heterozygosity levels were highest among honey bee populations in the south west region, which ranged between 0.5625 and 0.738 [10–12], and were lowest among honey bees in the middle east reported as 0.3179-0.5613 [5–8]. In the present study, the microsatellite mean expected heterozygosity values for ranged between 0.597 and 0.781, which is similar to those of honey bees in Yunnan. This similarity may be attributable to similar geographic environments in Yunnan and Mount Huang, which are both mountainous with high altitude.
The microsatellite data also showed that, the Mount Huang populations seem to be more variable compared to those in the eastern Chinese region. Average allele numbers and heterozygosities were higher in Mount Huang populations than in Fujian [5, 6], Jiangsu [7], Zhejiang [8]. This difference may, in part, be attributable to differences in the evaluated population sizes.
Significant deviations from Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium were observed at loci A024d, A014, A088, and A007 in all investigated populations even with correction by sequential Bonferroni method. Such deviation may be due to miscoring of alleles resulting from the existence of shatter bands [21]. However, in this case it is unlikely this is the cause, because the band intensity among a group of stutter bands was very carefully examined in order to obtain consistent allele designation. Due to the use of heterospecific primers in this species, the other factor may be a result of the presence of null alleles at these microsatellite loci [22]. It will be premature to conclude which of these factors contribute heterozygote deficiencies of A. cerana in Mount Huang until these bees are examined using microsatellite primers developed from A. cerana rather than those from A. mellifera [23].
Considering the FST estimates, all 16 microsatellite loci contributed mostly to differentiate the populations (Table 3), corresponding to the low Nm value (Nm < 1) between populations, which indicated. The FST value of AP033 loci here is similar to Ji et al. [7]. The bee samples we collected in present study included wild honey bees and domestic honey bees, which also may contribute to the large differentiation among honey bees from different locations. A total of seven Apis cerana populations in Huangshan were isolated by high mountains [24], it is unlikely gene flow for these honey bees.
Large genetic distances were observed among all populations, especially those between A. cerana from SC population and other populations (d = 0.3932-0.5027). The seven A. cerana populations in this study could then be genetically divided into three different groups, which included one group with JC, HSD, YC, and QMC populations, another with JXC and HZD populations, while the SC population was a separate group (Fig. 1). YC was firstly linked to HSD, which was also indicated by the relative high Nm values (0.7812) between them. While SC formed one group alone, it is located between Mount Huang and Mount Tianmu, this may have been an important barrier to gene flow for SC A. cerana and other populations.
Conclusion
Microsatellite data obtained in this study demonstrated that the Mount Huanghoney bee populations still have a natural genome worth being protected for conservation. However, further screening of A. cerana on a larger geographic scale should be carried out to fully elucidate the patterns of conspecific and intraspecific population structure in Wannan A. cerana.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants earmarked for Modern Agro-industry Technology Research System (CARS-45-KXJ9), and National Natural Science Foundation of China (No, 31272511; No. 31302039). We are grateful to Chengwu Wu, the director of Bureau of Animal husbandry of Huangshan in Anhui Province, and the Five Bee Home Limited Company for their help in bee-collecting. And we thank Ting Ji and Ling Yin from Yangzhou University for their kindly help in the research.
Authors’ contributions
FL and LSY designed research; FL and STF performed research; FL, SSH and SDB analyzed data and wrote the paper. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Additional file
Contributor Information
Fang Liu, Email: liufangbgh@163.com.
Tengfei Shi, Email: 15256560984@163.com.
Sisi Huang, Email: ddhss2006@126.com.
Linsheng Yu, Email: yulinsheng@ahau.edu.cn.
Shoudong Bi, Email: bishoudong@ahau.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Yu LS, Zou YD, Bi SD S. Relation between population dynamics and distribution of honey bees and ecological environment. Chin J Appl Ecol. 2006;17:1465–1468. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bowcock AM, Linares RA, Tomforhde J, Minch E, Kidd JR, Sforza CLL. High resolution of human evolutionary trees with polymorphic microsatellites. Nature. 1994;368:455–457. doi: 10.1038/368455a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Taylor AC, Sherwin WB, Wayne RK. Genetic variation of microsatellite loci in a bottlenecked species: the northern hairy-nosed wombat Lasiorhinus krefftii. Mol Ecol. 1994;3:277–299. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.1994.tb00068.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bodur ÇM, Kence KA. Genetic structure of honeybee, Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera:Apidae) populations of Turkey inferred from microsatellite analysis. J Apicult Res. 2007;46:50–56. doi: 10.1080/00218839.2007.11101366. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhu XJ, Zhou BF, Wu XD, Xu JX, Xia XC. Genetic diversity of Apis cerana cerana in Fujian based on microsatellite markers. J Fujian Agric Forestry Univ (National Science Edition) 2011;40(4):407–411. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhu XJ, Xu XJ, Zhou MQ, Wu XD, Zhou BF. Genetic analysis of Apis cerana cerana in Wuyi mountain nature reserve based on microsatellite DNA. Fujian J Agric Sci. 2011;26:935–940. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ji T, Chen J, Yin L, Bao WB, Chen GH. Study on microsatellite genetic polymorphism of wild and domestic Apis cerana cerana populations from Jiangsu province. China Anim Husbandry Vet Med. 2007;34:39–41. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Su XL, Cao L, Zhao DX, Hua Q, Hu FL. Genetic Diversity of Microsatellite DNA for Apis cerana cerana in Zhejiang. Apicult Chin. 2013;64:10–11. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Guo HP, Zhou SJ, Xu XJ, Xu JX, Yu YL, Yang KJ, Chen DY, Zhou BF. Population genetic analysis of Apis cerana cerana from the Qinling-Daba mountain areas based on microsatellite DNA. Acta Entomol Sin. 2016;59:337–345. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ji T, Yin L, Chen G. Genetic diversity and population structure of Chinese honeybees (Apis cerana) under microsatellite markers. Afr J Biotechnol. 2011;10:1712–1720. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lin D, Yin L, Jing T, Liu M, Chen HG. Study on genetic diversity of Apis cerana cerana populations from Lushui by microsatellite markers. Apiculture of China. 2009;60:9–11. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Yin L, Ji T, Chen GH. Study on genetic diversity and genetic differentiation of six geographic populations of Apis cerana (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in Yunnan by microsatellite markers. Southwest China J Agric Sci. 2011;24:772–779. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yu LS, Liu F, Huang SS, Bi SD, Zong C, Wang TS. Morphmetric analysis of Apis cerana populations in Huangshan. China J Apic Sci. 2013;57:117–124. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Smith DR, Hagen RH. The biogeography of Apis cerana as revealed by mitochondrial DNA sequence data. J Kansas EntomolSoc. 1996;69:294–310. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Solignac M, Vautrin D, Baudry E, Mougel F, Loiseau A, Cornuet JM. A microsatellite-based linkage Map of the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. Genetics. 2004;167(1):253–262. doi: 10.1534/genetics.167.1.253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Nei M. Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 1973;70:3321–3323. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rousset F. GENEPOP’ 007: a complete reimplementation of the GENEPOP software for windows and linux. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008;8:103–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Goudet J. FSTAT, a program to estimate and test gene diversities and fixation indices (version 2.9.3). Available from http://www2.unil.ch/popgen/softwares/fstat.htm. 2001. Updated from Goudet (1995).
- 19.Rice WS. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution. 1989;43:223–225. doi: 10.2307/2409177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Nei MF, Tajima TY. Accuracy of estimated phylogenetic trees from molecular data. J Mol Evol. 1983;19:153–170. doi: 10.1007/BF02300753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.O’Reilly P, Wright JM. The evolving technology of DNA fingerprinting and its application to fisheries and aquaculture. J Fish Biol. 1995;47:29–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1995.tb06042.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Callen DF, Thompson AD, Shen Y, Phillips HA, Richards RI, Mulley JC, Suthereland GR. Incidence and origin of ‘null’ alleles in the (AC) n microsatellite markers. Am J Hum Genet. 1993;52:922–927. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sittipraneed S, Laoaroon S, Klinbunga S, Wongsiri S. Genetic differentiation of the honey bee (Apis cerana) in Thailand: evidence from microsatellite polymorphism. J Apicult Res. 2001;40:9–16. doi: 10.1080/00218839.2001.11101043. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Jing CR. Mount Huangshan. Beijing: Science Press; 1994. [Google Scholar]