There is an error in Table 3. The beta coefficients (B) for the constant and trait are incorrectly swapped. The authors have provided a corrected table here.
Table 3. Logistic regression with Honesty-Humility as predictor.
| 95% CI for Odds Ratio | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B (SE) | Lower | Odds Ratio | Upper | ||
| Included | |||||
| Constant | 1.19 (0.67) | ||||
| HEXACO | |||||
| H | -2.53* (1.27) | 0.07 | 0.08 | 0.97 | |
Note: H = Honesty-Humility. R2 = .25 (Hosmer & Lemeshow), .26 (Cox & Snell), .37 (Nagelkerke). Model X2(1) = 6.01, p = .01.
*p = .05. (SE) = standard error.
Reference
- 1.Francis KB, Howard C, Howard IS, Gummerum M, Ganis G, Anderson G, et al. (2016) Virtual Morality: Transitioning from Moral Judgment to Moral Action? PLoS ONE 11(10): e0164374 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0164374 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]