Skip to main content
Public Health Reports logoLink to Public Health Reports
. 2016 Aug 22;131(5):658–660. doi: 10.1177/0033354916662638

Pregnancy Intention—More Important Than Ever

Susan B Moskosky 1,
PMCID: PMC5230815  PMID: 28123204

Pregnancy—either preventing it or achieving it—affects essentially every American at some point in life, either directly or indirectly. It has been estimated that the average US woman spends about 5 years being pregnant, postpartum, or trying to become pregnant and more than 30 years trying to avoid becoming pregnant.1 The nation has made progress in preventing pregnancy when it is unwanted and perhaps also in achieving it when it is wanted. But events such as the recent spread of the Zika virus into the Americas, with consequences of devastating birth defects and poor infant health outcomes, remind us of the renewed need for careful pregnancy planning efforts.24 Having served as the Acting Director of the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), Office of Population Affairs for more than 3 years, I can say I have never seen a greater need, or a better opportunity, to help Americans achieve their family planning goals.

The nation has turned a corner on unintended pregnancy, as demonstrated by sharp declines in teen childbearing and a recent reduction in total unintended pregnancies for women of all ages from 51% in 2008 to 45% in 2011.5 However, too many Americans still have poor reproductive health outcomes. Each year, approximately 2.8 million women have an unintended pregnancy. Approximately 42% of these end in abortion, and the cost of unintended births exceeds $20 million annually.5,6 More than 250,000 teens gave birth in 2014,7 and the public cost of teen pregnancy was estimated in 2010 to be almost $10 billion annually.8 In addition, about one-third of all US pregnancies occur too soon after a previous pregnancy (i.e., within 18 months of a preceding birth).9,10 This close birth spacing contributes to poor infant health outcomes, including 9.6% of infants born preterm and 8.0% born with a low birthweight in 2014.7

The threat of local spread of Zika virus to the United States in 2016 has elevated the need for expanded access to quality family planning services to an emergency level. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as of August 3, 2016, there had been 1,825 cases of Zika infection reported in the continental United States; 1,818 of those cases were travel-related and one was laboratory-acquired. In the US territories, 5,548 cases of Zika infection have been reported, 5,525 of which were locally acquired.11 Infection with the Zika virus in a pregnant woman is linked to microcephaly and other problems, such as absent or poorly developed brain structures, eye defects, hearing deficits, and impaired growth.24 The future impact of Zika in the United States is not yet known, but the geographic range of the Aedes mosquito that transmits the virus covers many states (Figure 1), and local transmission of Zika by mosquitoes has been identified in one neighborhood in Miami, Florida.12

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Estimated range of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in the United States, 2016.a aMaps have been updated from a variety of sources. These maps represent the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC’s) best estimate of the potential range of A. aegypti and A. albopictus in the United States. The maps are not meant to represent risk for spread of disease. Source: CDC (US). Surveillance and control of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus in the United States. http://www.cdc.gov/chikungunya/resources/vector-control.html. Accessed July 11, 2016.

Fortunately, we have the tools needed to address these challenges. Family planning services (ie, contraception to prevent pregnancy; pregnancy testing and counseling; services to achieve pregnancy, including basic infertility care; services for the prevention and management of sexually transmitted diseases; and other preconception health services) can help individuals and couples achieve their desired number and spacing of children and improve the chances that children will be born healthy. The nation has an unprecedented opportunity to increase access to and use of these services. The Affordable Care Act expanded access to contraceptive and other family planning services for more than 20 million American women and men.13 Evidence-based clinical recommendations have been developed for how to provide quality family planning services for women and men in a safe, effective, and client-centered manner, and these recommendations include services for preventing and achieving pregnancy, the true complement of “family planning.”1419

We have the needed technology. A wide range of safe and effective methods of contraception is available, including the long-acting reversible methods of contraception (LARC) (i.e., intrauterine devices and implants).20 A robust effort is underway to develop and disseminate the use of clinical performance measures to drive change in contraceptive care.21 These measures encourage the use of the more effective methods of contraception and address the critical need to ensure that services are offered in a client-centered, noncoercive manner.22 Furthermore, we have a mechanism to pay for these technologies. New payment strategies have been designed to remove barriers to contraceptive use and support same-day provision of all methods of contraception, including LARC.2325 These payment strategies are being considered by Medicaid26 and may be adopted by private health plans as well. A growing body of research shows that contraception results in a substantial economic return on investment.2730

What should we do now to seize the opportunity to help Americans achieve their family planning goals? First, health-care providers should screen all female and male clients of reproductive age for pregnancy intention and then follow federal and professional medical association recommendations to provide quality family planning services. Providers should educate their reproductive-age clients about the potential risk of Zika infection before the client decides to get pregnant and help pregnant women avoid infection through mosquito bites or unprotected sex with an infected or exposed partner.31,32

Second, women and men of reproductive age should become aware of the clinical care that is available to them, plan pregnancies for their own well-being and the well-being of any children they have, and seek family planning services that will help them to do so. Finally, private and public health plans should take steps to remove barriers to the delivery of contraceptive and other family planning services. Doing so will both improve reproductive health and save money.

We have the knowledge and the tools needed to reduce the rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States and improve birth spacing. Doing so will benefit women and men as they achieve their desired number and spacing of children, as well as the infants born to them. In addition, health plans and taxpayers will save money. Zika has increased the visibility and urgency of action. There is no time to waste.

Author Biography

Susan B. Moskosky is Acting Director of the US Department of Health and Human Services Office of Population Affairs in Rockville, Maryland.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

References

  • 1. The Alan Guttmacher Institute. Fulfilling the promise: public policy and US family planning clinics. New York: The Alan Guttmacher Institute; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Brasil P, Pereira JP, Jr, Gabaglia CR, Damasceno L, Wakimoto M, Nogueira RMR, et al. Zika virus infection in pregnant women in Rio de Janeiro—preliminary report [published online ahead of print March 4, 2016] N Engl J Med. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kleber de Oliveira W, Cortez-Escalante J, de Oliveira WT, Ikeda do Carmo GM, Pessanha Henriques CM, Coelho GE. Increase in reported prevalence of microcephaly in infants born to women living in areas with confirmed Zika virus transmission during the first trimester of pregnancy—Brazil, 2015. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(9):242–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Rodrigues LC. Microcephaly and Zika virus infection. Lancet. 2016;387:2070–2072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008-2011. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:843–852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Sonfield A, Kost K. Public costs from unintended pregnancies and the role of public insurance programs in paying for pregnancy and infant care: national and state estimates for 2010. New York: The Guttmacher Institute; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Curtin SC, Mathews TJ. Births: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64:1–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. Counting it up: the public costs of teen childbearing. Washington: The National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy; 2010. [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Copen CE, Thoma ME, Kirmeyer S. Interpregnancy intervals in the United States: data from the birth certificate and the National Survey of Family Growth. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64:1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Gemmill A, Lindberg LD. Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;122:64–71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Zika virus disease in the United States, 2015-2016. https://www.cdc.gov/zika/geo/united-states.html. Accessed July 11, 2016.
  • 12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). Advice for people living in or traveling to Wynwood, a neighborhood in Miami, FL. http://www.cdc.gov/zika/intheus/florida-update.html. Accessed August 10, 2016.
  • 13. Uberoi N, Finegold K, Gee E. Health insurance coverage and the Affordable Care Act, 2010-2016. Washington: Department of Health and Human Services (US), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation; March 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Gavin L, Moskosky S, Carter M, Curtis K, Glass E, Godfrey E, et al. Providing quality family planning services: recommendations of the CDC and the US Office of Population Affairs. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63(4):1–29. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). US selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2013. Adapted from the World Health Organization selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use, 2nd edition. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2013;62(RR-5):1–46. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). United States medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-4):1–88. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices. Practice Bulletin 121, July 2011 (reaffirmed 2015) Washington: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2015. [Google Scholar]
  • 18. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Adolescent Health Care, Adolescents and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. Implants and intrauterine devices. In Committee Opinion 539, October 2012 (reaffirmed 2014) Washington: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 2014. [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Ott MA, Sucato GS, American Academy of Pediatrics Committee on Adolescence. Policy statement: contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics. 2014;134:e1244–1256.25266430 [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Trussell J. Contraceptive failure in the United States. Contraception. 2011;83:397–404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Ivers N, Jamtvedt G, Flottorp S, Young JM, Odgaard-Jensen J, French SD, et al. Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012:CD000259. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Dehlendorf C, Bellanca H, Policar M. Performance measures for contraceptive care: what are we actually trying to measure? Contraception. 2015;91:433–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Hathaway M, Torres L, Vollet-Krech J, Wohltjen H. Increasing LARC utilization: any woman, any place, any time. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014;57:718–730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). The 6/18 initiative evidence summary: proposed payer interventions to prevent unintended pregnancy. http://www.cdc.gov/sixeighteen/pregnancy/index.htm. Accessed July 11, 2016.
  • 25. Moniz MH, Dalton VK, Davis MM, Forman J, Landgraf J, Chang T. Characterization of Medicaid policy for immediate postpartum contraception. Contraception. 2015;92:523–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (US). Maternal and infant health care quality. https://www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-CHIP-Program-Information/By-Topics/Quality-of-Care/Maternal-and-Infant-Health-Care-Quality.html. Accessed July 11, 2016.
  • 27. Cleland K, Peipert JF, Westhoff C, Spear S, Trussel J. Family planning as a cost-saving preventive health service. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:e37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Foster DG, Biggs MA, Malvin J, Bradsberry M, Darney P, Brindis CD. Cost-savings from the provision of specific contraceptive methods in 2009. Womens Health Issues. 2013;23: e265–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Frost JJ, Finer LB, Tapales A. The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008;19:778–796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Frost JJ, Sonfield A, Zolna MR, Finer LB. Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program. Milbank Q. 2014;92:696–749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Oduyebo T, Petersen EE, Rasmussen SA, Mead PS, Meaney-Delman D, Renquist CM, et al. Update: interim guidelines for health care providers caring for pregnant women and women of reproductive age with possible Zika virus exposure—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(5):122–127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Oster AM, Brooks JT, Stryker JE, Kachur RE, Mead P, Pesik NT, et al. Interim guidelines for prevention of sexual transmission of Zika virus—United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2016;65(5):120–121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Public Health Reports are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES