Military personnel on today’s battlefields face a plethora of potentially toxic hazards, not the least of which is exposure to heavy metals. Metals can be internalized through various routes, including ingestion and—as the most likely routes for military personnel—inhalation and embedding of fragments. Metal-containing particulates in smoke from destroyed vehicles and open-air burn pits, as well as environmental dust, present a risk for internalizing metals via inhalation. Likewise, wounds containing embedded metal fragments can result in a long-term depot of potentially toxic metals.
The recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan resulted in more than 45000 wounded US personnel. Based on US Department of Defense (DoD) casualty reports, an estimated two-thirds of these wounded personnel may have retained metal fragments.1 In an attempt to balance the surgical morbidity that can result from extensive fragment removal with the hypothetical health risk of the embedded metal, standard surgical guidelines recommend leaving embedded fragments in place except under certain circumstances. As a result, wounded veterans may carry these fragments for the rest of their lives.
The health risk of embedded fragments was traditionally considered low because they were thought to be inert once in the body. However, case reports on medical issues associated with embedded fragment wounds began appearing in the scientific literature in 1977.2–7 In most instances, these wounds were incurred during wartime, many years before the adverse health effect manifested, and the embedded fragment was lead, iron, or steel. However, the use of novel materials on the modern battlefield—in military munitions and in improvised explosive devices—presents the possibility of embedded fragment wounds with metals whose toxicologic and carcinogenic properties are not well known. Such was the case with depleted uranium munitions, which were first used extensively for combat during Operation Desert Storm. As a result of several friendly fire incidents, concern was raised about the wisdom of leaving in place fragments with the unique chemical and radiologic properties of depleted uranium. During the past 20 years, patient follow-up at the Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center showed no adverse health effects from these fragments.8 Likewise, laboratory animal studies using implanted fragments of depleted uranium showed no adverse health effects,9 with the exception of 1 investigation that tested a larger depleted uranium fragment. In this case, sarcoma formation occurred at the fragment implantation site.10
Concern about the health and environmental effects of depleted uranium led many countries to search for alternatives to it in armor-penetrating munitions, and tungsten-based materials were proposed as substitutes. However, when pellets of a military-grade tungsten/nickel/cobalt composite were implanted into the leg muscle of laboratory rodents, highly aggressive malignant rhabdomyosarcomas developed.11,12 Conversely, when pellets of a tungsten/nickel/iron composite were tested, no tumors formed.12,13 These results highlight the uncertainty facing medical providers when dealing with embedded metal fragment injuries. In response to this concern, in 2007 the DoD released Health Affairs Policy Letter 07-029, which directed medical personnel to send all surgically excised fragments for laboratory analysis.14 The DoD further directed that these laboratory results be entered into the patient’s medical record.
Research with laboratory animals also showed that embedded metal fragments are not static but tend to solubilize; the released metals travel to and deposit in various tissues in the body.15 Of particular concern is the finding that metals from embedded fragments can solubilize and cross the blood-brain barrier in a dose-dependent and metal-specific manner.16 This finding suggests that in multitrauma cases, especially those involving traumatic brain injuries, the presence of embedded metal fragments should not be ignored.
Although inhalation is a primary route of exposure for internalized metals, the final deposition of the metals ultimately depends on the size, composition, and solubility of the inhaled particles. Respiratory effects from inhaling particulate matter from desert dust storms or open-air burn pits are one area of concern. Inhalation of desert dust particulates may have played a role in the manifestation of Gulf War syndrome,17 as well as outbreaks of respiratory ailments of unknown etiology termed “severe acute pneumonitis” among personnel in the recent conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.18 A more thorough investigation of Iraqi desert dust showed that these particles possessed a clay or quartz core surrounded by an inorganic layer of calcium carbonate containing various metals, including—in order of decreasing concentration—aluminum, iron, uranium, nickel, cobalt, copper, lead, chromium, strontium, tin, manganese, zinc, barium, arsenic, and vanadium. Metal concentrations varied, but aluminum and iron appeared in the highest concentrations, with aluminum sometimes reaching levels as high as 10000 ppm.19 A recent study of metal levels in lung biopsies from US military personnel deployed to Iraq and Afghanistan showed substantially higher levels in the samples from personnel who had constrictive bronchiolitis as compared with controls or those who had autoimmune bronchiolitis. Metals found at substantially higher levels included aluminum, cadmium, silicon, and vanadium.20
Although the respiratory system is the primary site of damage resulting from inhalation of metal-associated particulates, evidence suggests that inhalation of these particulates also results in long-term immunologic, cardiovascular, and neurologic problems. For example, when samples of Iraqi desert dust were administered intratracheally to laboratory mice, lung inflammation and fibrosis developed, and regulatory T cells from the spleen and thymus were depleted.21 In addition, inhalation of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) containing cadmium, lead, strontium, tin, vanadium, and zinc substantially increased blood pressure among study participants,22 and long-term exposure to metal-containing particulate matter was proposed as a factor in chronic hypertension.23 Particulate matter containing vanadium or nickel induced extensive injury to myocardial mitochondria when administered intratracheally to laboratory rats.24 Inhalation of metal-containing particulate matter was also shown to increase metal content in the brains of laboratory animals25–27 and humans.28 Many metals enter the brain through the olfactory neurons,29,30 whereas other metals use alternate means of crossing the blood-brain barrier.31 Disruption of the blood-brain barrier was shown to enhance the entry of certain metals into the brain,32 suggesting that heavy metals and the integrity of the blood-brain barrier play an important role in the onset of neurologic diseases.33,34
From laboratory animal studies and human health reports, it is clear that internalized metals—from both inhalation and embedded fragments—can lead to the development of cardiovascular, immunologic, and neurologic ailments. However, a lack of information on the long-term health effects of internalized metals, alone and in combination with polytrauma, can result in veterans suffering from these types of injuries and not receiving appropriate medical care. Several areas deserve further investigation:
information on the biokinetics of internalized military-relevant metals and metal mixtures,
effects of internalized metals on long-term cardiovascular and neurologic health, and
consequences of internalized metals on recovery from polytraumatic injury.
More important is the prompt identification and tracking of people with embedded metal fragments. Identification and tracking include following the guidelines in the DoD Health Affairs Policy Letter 07-029, which states that all surgically excised fragments should be sent for laboratory analysis and that all laboratory results should be included in the patient’s health record.14 This information is critical in identifying veterans with internalized metals so that they can be referred to the US Department of Veterans Affairs Toxic Embedded Fragment Center for long-term health surveillance. The information obtained from further research and proper tracking of wounded service members will enable medical personnel to provide the proper care that our veterans deserve.
Footnotes
Author Note: The views expressed in this commentary do not necessarily represent the views of the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute, the Graduate School of Nursing, the Uniformed Services University, or the US Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs.
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported in part by Veterans Affairs grant B5044 R to C.E.K. and US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command grant DAMD17-01-1-0821 to J.F.K.
References
- 1. US Department of Defense. Defense Manpower Data Center, Defense Casualty Management System: US military casualties—casualty summary by casualty type. https://www.dmdc.osd.mil/dcas/pages/report_sum_reason.xhtml. Accessed August 1, 2016.
- 2. Schenck NL, Kronman BS. Hoarseness and mass in the neck 30 years after penetrating shrapnel injury. Ann Otol Rhino Laryngol. 1977;86(2 Pt 1):259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Knox J, Wilkinson A. Shrapnel presenting with symptoms 62 years after wounding. Br Med J. 1981;283(6285):193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Symonds RP, Mackay C, Morley P. The late effect of grenade fragments. J R Army Med Corps. 1985;131(2):68–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Lindeman G, McKay MJ, Taubman KL, Bilous AM. Malignant fibrous histiocytoma developing in bone 44 years after shrapnel trauma. Cancer. 1990;66(10):2229–2232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ligtenstein DA, Krijnen JL, Jansen BR, Eulderink F. Forgotten injury: a late benign complication of an unremoved shrapnel fragment—case report. J Trauma. 1994;36(4):580–582. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Eylon S, Mosheiff R, Liebergall M, Wolf E, Brocke L, Peyser A. Delayed reaction to shrapnel retained in soft tissue. Injury. 2005;36(2):275–281. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Squibb KS, Gaitens JM, Engelhardt S, et al. Surveillance for long-term health effects associated with depleted uranium exposure and retained embedded fragments in US veterans. J Occup Environ Med. 2012;54(6):724–732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Pellmar TC, Fuciarelli AF, Ejnik JW, et al. Distribution of uranium in rats implanted with depleted uranium pellets. Toxicol Sci. 1999;49(1):29–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hahn FF, Guilmette RA, Hoover MD. Implanted depleted uranium fragments cause soft tissue sarcomas in the muscles of rats. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110(1):51–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Kalinich JF, Emond CA, Dalton TK, et al. Embedded weapons-grade tungsten alloy shrapnel rapidly induces metastatic high-grade rhabdomyosarcomas in F344 rats. Environ Health Perspect. 2005;113(6):729–734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Schuster BE, Roszell LE, Murr LE, et al. In vivo corrosion, tumor outcome, and microarray gene expression for two types of muscle-implanted tungsten alloys. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2012;265(1):128–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Emond CA, Vergara VB, Lombardini ED, Mog SR, Kalinich JF. Induction of rhabdomyosarcoma by embedded military-grade tungsten/nickel/cobalt not by tungsten/nickel/iron in the B6C3F1 mouse. Int J Toxicol. 2015;34(1):44–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. US Department of Health Affairs. Policy letter 07-029: policy on analysis of metal fragments removed from Department of Defense personnel. http://www.health.mil/∼/media/MHS/Policy%20Files/Import/07-029.ashx. Published December 18, 2007. Accessed October 22, 2015.
- 15. Emond CA, Kalinich JF. Biokinetics of embedded surrogate radiological dispersal device material. Health Phys. 2012;102(2):124–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Kalinich JF, Kasper CE. Do metals that translocate to the brain exacerbate traumatic brain injury? Med Hypotheses. 2014;82(5):558–562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Korényi-Both AL, Svéd L, Korényi-Both GE, Juncer DJ, Korényi-Both AL, Székely A. The role of the sand in chemical warfare agent exposure among Persian Gulf War veterans: Al Eskan disease and “dirty dust.” Mil Med. 2000;165(5):321–336. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Shorr AF, Scoville SL, Cersovsky SB, et al. Acute eosinophilic pneumonia among US military personnel deployed in or near Iraq. JAMA. 2008;292(24):2997–3005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Lyles MB, Fredrickson HL, Fannin HB, Bednar AJ, Griffin DW, Sobecki TM. The chemical, biological, and physical characterization of dust particulates from the Middle East. Chin J Geochem. 2008;25(suppl):2–3. [Google Scholar]
- 20. Lowers HA, Todorov T, Strand MJ, et al. Lung biopsies from symptomatic military deployers have variable mineral particle types and higher abundances of silicon, aluminum, cadmium and vanadium compared to controls. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;191:A2575. [Google Scholar]
- 21. Szema AM, Reeder RJ, Harrington AD, et al. Iraq dust is respirable, sharp, and metal-laden and induces inflammation with fibrosis in mice via IL-2 upregulation and depletion of regulatory T cells. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(3):243–251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Cakmak S, Dales R, Kauri LM, et al. Metal composition of fine particulate air pollution and acute changes in cardiorespiratory physiology. Environ Pollut. 2014;189:208–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Brook RD, Rajagopalan S. Particulate matter, air pollution, and blood pressure. J Am Soc Hypertens. 2009;3(5):332–350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Golomb E, Matza D, Cummings CA, et al. Myocardial mitochondrial injury induced by pulmonary exposure to particulate matter in rats. Toxicol Pathol. 2012;40(5):779–788. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Dorman DC, Struve MF, James RA, Marshall MW, Parkinson CU, Wong BA. Influence of particle solubility on the delivery of inhaled manganese to the rat brain: manganese sulfate and manganese tetroxide pharmacokinetics following repeated (14-day) exposure. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2001;170(2):79–87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Avila-Costa MR, Fortoul TI, Niño-Cabrera G, et al. Hippocampal cell alterations induced by the inhalation of vanadium pentoxide (V2O5) promote memory deterioration. Neurotoxicology. 2006;27(6):1007–1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Bensoussan H, Grancolas L, Dhieux-Lestaevel B, et al. Heavy metal uranium affects the brain cholinergic system in rat following sub-chronic and chronic exposure. Toxicology. 2009;261(1-2):59–67. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Caldéron-Garcidueñas L, Serrano-Sierra A, Torres-Jardón R, et al. The impact of environmental metals in young urbanites’ brains. Exp Toxicol Pathol. 2013;65(5):503–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Tjälve H, Henriksson J. Uptake of metals in the brain via olfactory pathways. Neurotoxicology. 1999;20(2-3):181–195. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Lucchini RG, Dorman DC, Elder A, Veronesi B. Neurological impacts from inhalation of pollutants and the nose-brain connection. Neurotoxicology. 2012;33(4):838–841. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Radcliffe PM, Olabisi AO, Wagner DJ, et al. Acute sodium tungstate inhalation is associated with minimal olfactory transport of tungsten (188 W) to the rat brain. Neurotoxicology. 2009;30(3):445–450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Ong WY, He X, Chau LH, Ong CN. Increased uptake of divalent metals lead and cadmium into the brain after kainite-induced neuronal injury. Exp Brain Res. 2006;173(3):468–474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Giacoppo S, Galuppo M, Calabrò RS, et al. Heavy metals and neurodegenerative diseases: an observational study. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2014;161(2):151–160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Zheng W, Aschner M, Ghersi-Egea JF. Brain barrier systems: a new frontier in metal neurotoxicological research. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2003;192(1):1–11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
