Abstract
Background
Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia) and mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) are the major cause of pollen allergy in late summer. Allergen-specific lymphocytes are crucial for immune modulation during immunotherapy. We sought to generate and pre-clinically characterise highly immunogenic domains of the homologous pectate lyases in ragweed (Amb a 1) and mugwort pollen (Art v 6) for immunotherapy.
Methods
Domains of Amb a 1 (Amb a 1α) and Art v 6 (Art v 6α) and a hybrid molecule, consisting of both domains, were designed, expressed in E. coli and purified. Human IgE reactivity and allergenicity were assessed by ELISA and mediator release experiments using ragweed and mugwort allergic patients. Moreover, T cell proliferation was determined. Blocking IgG antibodies and cytokine production in BALB/c mice were studied by ELISA and ELISPOT.
Results
The IgE binding capacity and in vitro allergenic activity of the Amb a 1 and Art v 6 domains and the hybrid were either greatly reduced or abolished. The recombinant proteins induced T cell proliferative responses comparable to those of the natural allergens, indicative of retained allergen-specific T cell response. Mice immunisation with the hypoallergens induced IL-4, IL-5, IL-13 and IFN-γ production after antigen-specific in vitro re-stimulation of splenocytes. Moreover, murine IgG antibodies that inhibited specific IgE binding of ragweed and mugwort pollen allergic patients were detected.
Conclusion
Accumulation of T cell epitopes and deletion of IgE reactive areas of Amb a 1 and Art v 6, modulated the immunologic properties of the allergen immuno-domains, leading to promising novel candidates for therapeutic approach.
Introduction
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only treatment of allergy capable of modulating the inflammatory T cell response, inducing allergen-specific regulatory T cells, and activating B cells to produce allergen-specific IgG blocking antibodies [1–3]. To reduce the risk of IgE mediated side effects associated with allergen extracts during AIT [4], recombinant-based formulations containing hypoallergens have been developed as candidates in the treatment of pollen allergy [5]. Therefore, it is essential to carefully select and standardise these candidate molecules. In contrast to tree and grass pollen vaccine candidates [5], well-characterised recombinant allergens are not yet available for short ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), which represents one of the most prominent seasonal allergen sources across the United States, Canada and parts of Europe [6,7]. Mugwort (Artemisia vulgaris) pollen represents the main cause of seasonal IgE-mediated allergy in late summer in many areas in Europe and Asia. The pollen seasons of both plants overlap in late summer. Thus, patients sensitized to both allergens are in many cases co-sensitized by either source, however, significant cross-reactivity has also been reported [8].
The most relevant allergen in ragweed pollen allergy is the pectate lyase (PL) Amb a 1, which reacts with IgE of more than 90% of ragweed-allergic individuals [9]. Amb a 1 shares 65% amino acid sequence identity with the homologous allergen Art v 6 from mugwort pollen [10], also belonging to the PL allergen family. This results in cross-reactivity at the B and T cell level [11]. Amb a 1 appears to be the primary sensitizer for most patients; nevertheless, Art v 6 also has the potential to sensitize susceptible individuals in areas with high mugwort pollen exposure [11].
Allergen-specific CD4+ T lymphocytes are crucial cellular components in allergic immune responses and knowledge of allergen-derived T cell epitopes can help understanding immune modulation during AIT [1]. Natural (n) Amb a 1 is susceptible to proteolysis into two immunologic distinct domains: the C-terminal alpha chain harbouring the majority of T cell epitopes and the N-terminal beta chain displaying most of the IgE reactivity [12,13]. More than 20 Amb a 1 T cell epitopes have been described, including 3 immunodominant epitopes corresponding to residues 178–189, 199–216, 343–357, which are located in the C-terminal alpha chain [13]. Five cross-reactive regions, including 2 immunodominant Amb a 1 epitopes, have been described for Art v 6 [11]. Nevertheless, it remains unclear which of the two Amb a 1 domains is responsible for the molecule´s allergenic properties. Moreover, no data is available describing the ability of the alpha chain to initiate a humoral immune response on its own.
Thus, we investigated, for the first time, the humoral and cellular immune responses to the alpha chains of Amb a 1 and Art v 6 in an in vivo model. Moreover, we combined both alpha chains to a hybrid molecule, which was used to analyse possible synergistic immunologic effects of both domains fused within the same molecule.
Materials and Methods
Patients
Patients with Ambrosia artemisiifolia (ragweed) and/or Artemisia vulgaris (mugwort) pollen allergy were selected on the basis of case history, positive skin prick tests to either ragweed or mugwort pollen, or to both, and in vitro IgE to ragweed and/or mugwort pollen (ImmunoCAP; Phadia, Uppsala, Sweden) (Table 1). Experiments using patients´ blood samples were approved by the local ethics committee of the Medical University of Vienna, Austria (EK 712/2010) and all patients gave their written informed consent, including the guardians on behalf of the children enrolled in this study.
Table 1. Patients’ data.
SPT | ImmunoCAP (kUA/L) | ELISA (OD) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient No. | Age/sex | Ragweed | Mugwort | Ragweed | Mugwort | nAmb a 1 | nArt v 6 | Total IgE (kU/L) | Symptoms* |
1 | 39/f | + | - | 65.9 | <0.35 | 3.959 | 0.231 | 209 | R/C |
2 | 69/f | - | + | 0.71 | 0.77 | 0.498 | 0.291 | 100 | R/C |
3 | 59/m | + | + | 3.99 | 2.5 | 0.866 | 0.621 | 74.7 | R |
4 | 41/f | + | + | 69.6 | 8.26 | 3.96 | 3.547 | 186 | R |
5 | 25/f | - | + | <0.35 | 0.61 | 0.34 | 0.727 | 61.4 | R |
6 | 41/f | + | - | 0.47 | <0.35 | 0.344 | 0.37 | 23.6 | C |
7 | 15/m | + | + | 20.5 | 23.5 | 3.627 | 3.957 | 241 | R |
8 | 65/f | + | - | >100 | <0.35 | 3.151 | 0.143 | 664 | R/A |
9 | 36/m | + | - | 9.54 | 6.32 | 2.046 | 2.677 | 58.2 | R |
10 | 19/f | + | + | 18.1 | 2.83 | 3.702 | 0.346 | 149 | R |
11 | 45/m | + | - | 33 | 1.68 | 3.959 | 0.149 | 229 | R |
12 | 27/m | - | + | <0.35 | 1.09 | <0.160 | 0.599 | 43 | R/C |
13 | 49/f | - | + | n.d. | 4.32 | <0.160 | 3.961 | 180 | R/C |
14 | 55/m | + | + | 19.5 | 56.1 | 0.318 | 3.962 | 746 | R |
15 | 60/f | + | + | 19.8 | 9.97 | 3.623 | 3.961 | 83.8 | R |
16 | 54/f | + | - | 39.8 | nd | 0.505 | 2.029 | 311 | RC |
17 | 31/m | + | - | 21.3 | 3.05 | 0.895 | 0.538 | 172 | R/B |
18 | 11/f | + | - | 17.8 | nd | 0.537 | 1.354 | 1927 | R/U |
19 | 41/f | - | + | 20.4 | 21.9 | 2.000 | 1.507 | 259 | B |
20 | 43/f | + | + | 19 | 1.04 | 0.586 | 0.756 | 85.1 | RC |
21 | 41/f | + | + | 40.6 | 7.35 | 1.445 | 0.911 | 363 | R/A |
22 | 33/m | - | + | 49.8 | 3.12 | 1.607 | 2.190 | 602 | R/A |
23 | 29/m | + | - | 27.9 | nd | 1.511 | 0.545 | 1107 | R |
24 | 12/m | + | - | >100 | 32 | 2.158 | 1.262 | 2087 | R |
25 | 34/m | + | - | 33.4 | 3.24 | 1.173 | 2.143 | 254 | R/C |
26 | 24/m | + | + | 91.6 | 18.4 | 2.151 | 2.077 | 272 | R |
27 | 17/m | + | - | 21.9 | nd | 1.239 | 0.528 | 815 | R |
28 | 65/f | + | - | 21.3 | 26.6 | 0.729 | 0.604 | 80.2 | R |
29 | 19/m | + | + | 57.5 | 31.1 | 2.177 | 1.992 | 1395 | R/A |
30 | 33/f | + | + | 34 | 6.61 | 1.204 | 1.617 | 501 | R/A |
31 | 15/f | + | + | 95.3 | 14.5 | 2.390 | 1.197 | 514 | R/C |
32 | 45/f | + | - | 32.7 | 72.5 | 0.805 | 0.582 | 728 | R/C |
33 | 41/m | - | + | 30.6 | 24.9 | 0.848 | 0.703 | 391 | R/C |
34 | 31/m | + | - | 78 | nd | 0.507 | 1.503 | 1217 | A |
35 | 56/m | + | + | 43.5 | 4.48 | 1.702 | 0.575 | 234 | R/A |
36 | 11/f | + | + | 28.7 | 0.49 | 1.017 | 1.366 | 212 | A |
37 | 12/f | + | + | 51.1 | 44.1 | 1.490 | 0.517 | 333 | R |
38 | 46/f | + | + | 28.7 | 12.4 | 1.598 | 0.904 | 1100 | A |
39 | 33/m | + | + | >100 | 30.4 | 2.396 | 2.047 | 1173 | R/C |
40 | 18/f | + | - | 30.2 | 1.08 | 1.882 | 1.212 | 1753 | R/A |
*R: rhinitis; C: conjunctivitis; A: asthma; B: bronchitis; U: urticaria
Purification of nAmb a 1 and nArt v 6
Natural Amb a 1 (nAmb a 1) and natural Art v 6 (nArt v 6) were purified from ragweed pollen and mugwort pollen extracts, respectively, as described elsewhere [11,14].
Cloning, expression, and purification of recombinant Amb a 1α, Art v 6α, as well as an Amb a 1α-Art v 6α hybrid molecule
Recombinant Amb a 1.3 (GenBank Acession C53240) [11] clone R2 with 3 amino acid substitutions L23Y, F364L, H367R) and Art v 6.0101 (GenBank Acession AY904433) were obtained from Biomay (Vienna, Austria). These clones were used as template for the production of Amb a 1α and Art v 6α as C-terminal 6x His-tagged proteins by PCR. An E. coli codon-optimised synthetic gene coding for the hybrid molecule was synthesised by ATG Biosynthetics (Merzhausen, Germany). The recombinant hybrid protein consisted of head to tail fusion of rAmb a 1α and rArt v 6α, respectively, linked to a C-terminal 6-hexahistidine tag. Genes were cloned into the vector pET-28b (Novagen Inc, Madison, Wis) and constructs were transformed into E. coli BL21Star (DE3) cells (Invitrogen, Groningen, Netherlands). The correct sequence of the DNA inserts was confirmed by double-stranded DNA sequencing (ATG Biosynthetics GmbH, Merzhausen, Germany).
Protein synthesis was induced with 0.5 mM IPTG (isopropyl b-D-thiogalactoside) at 16°C overnight and cells were harvested by centrifugation (5000g, 20 min, 4°C). The pellet was resuspended in lysis buffer (1:16) (20 mM Tris/HCl buffer, 0.5 M urea, 1 mM DTT, pH 9.5) containing protease inhibitor cocktail as per manufacturer’s instructions (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) and subjected to three freeze–thaw cycles using liquid nitrogen. Cell debris was removed by means of centrifugation (16,000g for 30 minutes at 4°C) and filtration.
Filtered lysate was loaded onto an anion-exchange column; DEAE (GE Healthcare, Munich Germany) for Amb a 1α purification and Q-Sepharose for Art v 6α purification, equilibrated with 20mM Tris pH 8.0, 1mM DTT, 0.5M urea; and Q-Sepharose FF for the hybrid molecule purification equilibrated with 20mM Tris/HCl pH 9.5, 1mM DTT, 6M urea. The proteins were eluted with a linear gradient of 0–1 M NaCl in equilibration buffer. The target proteins were subsequently purified by immobilized Ni-affinity chromatography (GE Healthcare) equilibrated in 20 mM Tris buffer pH 8.0, 0.5M NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 0.5 M urea, 1 mM DTT for Amb a 1α and Art v 6α purification or 20 mM Tris buffer pH 9.5, 0.5M NaCl, 20 mM imidazole, 6 M urea, 1 mM DTT for the hybrid molecule purification, respectively. The proteins were eluted with decreasing imidazole concentrations (20 mM–0.5 M). Fractions containing the protein were pooled and dialysed against 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1 mM DTT. The hybrid molecule refolding was performed by stepwise decreasing the urea concentration during dialysis and the presence of 0.5M L-arginine and finally against 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 8.0) containing 1 mM DTT.
Endotoxin content of all recombinant proteins was < 1 ng/mg protein as determined by limulus amebocyte lysate (LAL) assay (Associates of Cape Cod. Inc, East Falmouth, Mass).
Circular dichroism (CD)
Far UV CD spectra were recorded at 0.1 mg/ml in 10 mM sodium phosphate pH 7.4 as described elsewhere [15].
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA)
ELISA experiments were performed as previously described [16] with a few modifications. Maxisorp plates were coated with 50 μl of allergen at 2 μg/mL in PBS overnight at 4°C. Bound IgE was detected with alkaline phosphatase-conjugated monoclonal antihuman IgE antibodies (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ) (1:3000) after incubation for 1.5 h at 37°C and 1.5 h at RT. Determinations were performed in triplicates. For cross-inhibition assays 5 individual patients’ sera were pre-incubated at 4°C overnight with increasing concentrations of allergen.
Rat basophil leukaemia (RBL) cell mediator release assay
The allergenic potential of the allergens was measured by RBL assay as previously described [17]. Briefly, RBL-H2H3 cells were sensitised with 5 ragweed/mugwort pollen allergic sera (patients´ number 24, 27, 31, 35, 38 Table 1) overnight. Degranulation was triggered by the addition of various concentrations of nAmb a 1, nArt v 6, Amb a 1α, Art v 6α and hybrid (10–0.0001 μg/ml). Release of β-hexosaminidase into the supernatant was measured by means of enzymatic cleavage of the fluorogenic substrate 4-methylumbelliferyl-N-acetyl-β-glucosaminide and expressed as the percentage of total enzyme content obtained by lysing the cells with 1% Triton X-100.
Amb a 1 and Art v 6-specific T cell reactivity
Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) from ragweed/mugwort pollen allergic patients were isolated from heparinized blood by Ficoll-Hypaque (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) density gradient centrifugation. PBMCs were stimulated in triplicates with equimolar concentration of nArt v 6, nAmb a 1, Amb a 1α, Art v 6α or hybrid (62 pmol-7.5 pmol) for 6 days. T cell proliferation was measured by the incorporation of [3H]thymidine (0.5 μ Ci/well) after 16 h by scintillation counting as described [11]. Stimulation indices (SI; ratio between cpm obtained in cultures stimulated with antigen and cpm obtained in control cultures without antigen) were determined as described [11].
Art v 6- and Amb a 1–specific T-cell lines (TCLs) were established from PBMCs in triplicates by using nArt v 6 or nAmb a 1 (2 μg/well), as the initial stimulus. The proliferative responses of TCL to nAmb a 1, nArt v 6, Amb a 1F, Art v 6α or hybrid (25 pmol) were assessed after 48 h by [3H]thymidine uptake as described [11].
Animal experiments
Female BALB/c mice (Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Mass) 8–10 weeks old were immunised subcutaneously with 5 μg antigen adsorbed to Alugel-S (Serva, Heidelberg, Germany) or PBS given as two 50-μL subcutaneous injections administered bilaterally in the lumbar region and boosted on days 23, 38 and 52. Sera were collected on days 0, 31 and 64. Six animals per group were tested.
Serum IgG1 and IgG2a was analysed by ELISA as described [16]. In brief, plates were coated with 2 μg/ml antigen overnight. After washing and blocking, plates were incubated with individual mouse serum serial 5-fold dilutions, starting at 1:100, overnight at 4°C. Rat anti-mouse IgG1 and IgG2a alkaline phosphatase (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) were added to detect bound IgG and the reaction developed with p-nitrophenyl phosphate (PNPP) (Sigma-Aldrich). Absorption was measured at 405 nm. For inhibition assay coated antigen was incubated with mouse serum (dilution 1:20) for 16 h at 4°C. Individual human sera (n = 5) were added in a 1:10 dilution, and bound IgE was detected as described for direct ELISA.
RBL-H2H3 cells were incubated with a pool of 6 mice sera (1/60) for 2 h at 37°C. After adding 0.3 μg/ml of each allergen, degranulation of RBL cells was induced and β-hexosaminidase activity in the supernatant was analysed as previously described [17].
Antigen-specific IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, IL-13 or IFN-γ-secreting splenic lymphocytes were detected by ELISPOT (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Animal experiments were conducted in accordance with EU guidelines 86/609/EWG and national legal regulations (TVG 2012). This study was approved by the Austrian Ministry of Science, Ref. II/3b (Gentechnik und Tierversuche), permission number BMWF-66-012/0010-II/3b/2013. Mice were kept in individually vented IVC modules in the SPF (special pathogen free) animal facilities at the University of Salzburg. Food and water was given ad libitum. Animals were kept in groups of five per IVC module at 20–24°C and a relative humidity of 55%. Bedding and water was changed weekly. The light/dark cycles were set in 12 h intervals with a 30 min dim period from 0–200 lux and vice versa. Blood samples were taken by punctuation of the vena facialis. For analyses of splenocytes animals were sacrificed via cervical dislocation.
Statistical analysis
Data were analyzed by GraphPad Prism version 5 (Graph-Pad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using ANOVA and Bonferroni post test. P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
Results
Expression, purification and characterisation of Amb a 1α, Art v 6α and hybrid
Amb a 1α (rAmb a 1 residues 174–397), Art v 6α (rArt v 6 residues 173–396), and a hybrid molecule containing rAmb a 1 residues 174–373 at the N-terminus and rArt v 6 residues 173–370 at the C-terminus, linked by 2 glycine residues, were codon-optimized and produced in E. coli as C-terminally 6x His-tagged fusion protein (Fig 1A and 1B).
The purified proteins showed a mixture of α-helical and β-sheet secondary structure elements, and a folded state as determined by far-UV circular dichroism (Fig 2A).
Reduced human IgE reactivity and in vivo allergenic activity to Amb a 1α, Art v 6α and hybrid
Compared to purified natural allergens, each of the Amb a 1α and Art v 6 α and hybrid molecules were virtually not recognized by specific IgE from 30 ragweed/mugwort-allergic patients (P< 0.001) (Fig 2B).
Furthermore, cross-inhibitory experiments with coated natural and recombinant proteins as inhibitors were performed. Self-inhibition of IgE binding by nAmb a 1 and nArt v 6 reached 90.5% and 82%, respectively (mean values) (Fig 2C). Inhibition of IgE binding to nAmb a 1 by preincubation with nArt v 6 ranged from 45 to 65%, whereas inhibition of IgE binding to Art v 6 by preincubation with Amb a 1 ranged from 60 to 80%. Compared to purified natural allergens, the domains’ inhibitory capacity was significantly (P<0.001) reduced at 50 pmol (Fig 2C), 0.5 pmol and 0.005 pmol (results not shown).
The low IgE-binding capacity of the recombinant domains was confirmed by the lack of induction of mediator release even at the highest concentration (10 μg/ml). The natural proteins showed biological activity between 0.1 μg/ml and 10 μg/ml with a maximum mediator release of 60–70% (Fig 3).
Activation of human Amb a 1- or Art v 6-specific T lymphocytes by Amb a 1α, Art v 6α and hybrid
Comparable proliferative responses in human PBMCs isolated from 10 ragweed/mugwort pollen-allergic donors were induced by equimolar amounts of the domains (62 pmol, Fig 4A, 31–7.75 pmol results not shown) and purified natural allergens.
Similarly, nAmb a 1- and nArt v 6-induced T cell lines (TCL) established from 14 ragweed/mugwort pollen-allergic patients and re-stimulated with natural or recombinant protein (25 pmol), displayed proliferation responses that were not significantly different between the natural and the constructs (Fig 4B and 4C). Amb a 1α, Art v 6α and the hybrid molecule induced responses in 7, 6 and 8 of 8 nAmb a 1-specific TCL, respectively (Fig 4B), and 5, 3, and 5 of 9 nArt v 6-specific TCL, respectively (Fig 4C), confirming that the relevant Amb a 1/Art v 6 T cell epitopes are located in the alpha chain domains.
Induction of murine Amb a 1- or Art v 6-specific blocking IgG antibodies by Amb a 1α, Art v 6α and hybrid
To investigate the immunogenic properties of the recombinant proteins, mice were immunised with the natural or recombinant proteins, and the levels of serum IgG1 and IgG2a to Amb a 1, Art v 6 or Bet v 1 (as unrelated protein) were measured by ELISA. The domains induced IgG1 and IgG2a antibodies against nAmb a 1 and nArt v 6 (Fig 5A and 5B).
Cross-reactive IgG response was similar between the domains and nAmb a 1 but significantly stronger when compared to nArt v 6. Interestingly, the hybrid induced cross-reactive nArt v 6 IgG antibodies that were significantly higher than those induced by nAmb 1-immunised mice (Fig 5A). IgG2a levels were comparable between proteins (Fig 5B). Lack of Bet v 1-specific IgG1 and IgG2a was observed (results no shown).
Degranulation by biologically active anti–Amb a 1 or Art v 6–specific IgE antibodies was confirmed by means of RBL-2H3 assay in sera of 6 mice immunized with nAmb a1, nArt v 6, Amb a 1α, Art v 6α or hybrid. The natural proteins showed biological activity with a maximum mediator release of 90% by nAmb a 1 and 82% by nArt v 6. Moreover, a significantly reduced capacity to induce mediator release by the variants compared to the natural proteins was also confirmed in our mouse model (P<0.001) (Fig 5C).
Mouse IgG antibodies induced by the recombinant domains partly inhibited the IgE binding of 5 ragweed/mugwort pollen-allergic patients’ sera IgE to nAmb a 1 (30–35% mean inhibition) and nArt v 6 (17–21%), indicative of the presence of conserved antibody epitopes on the alpha domains (Fig 5D).
Retained T cell reactivity in mice
Splenocytes from immunised mice re-stimulated with each of the 5 proteins were evaluated for cytokine production by ELISPOT (Fig 6A and 6B). Recombinant proteins induced similar IL-5 production compared to the natural allergens (Fig 6A). Only Amb a 1α immunisation induced significantly higher IFN-γ levels than the natural allergens. Whereas the hybrid molecule induced similar IL-4 levels compared to the natural molecules, both Amb a 1α and Art v 6α immunisation induced significantly higher levels. Low and comparable levels of IL-13- or IL-10-secreting T cells were detected, whereas immunization with nAmb a 1 failed to induce IL-10-secreting cells (P<0.05) (Fig 6B). These results demonstrate that the alpha domains are able to evoke a TH1/TH2 type immune response.
Discussion
We hypothesised that the accumulation of T cell epitopes and the elimination of IgE domains can regulate the allergen specific T cell response to Amb a 1 and Art v 6 leading to a promising vaccine candidate. Our strategy focused on generating 3 molecules consisting of T cell epitopes containing immunodomains of the homologous PL Amb a 1, Art v 6 and an Amb a 1-Art v 6 hybrid. The hybrid strategy not only simplifies protein production, but has the advantage that a single molecule contains the immunologic information of relevant pollen allergens from different sources as demonstrate with hybrids from the Fagales family [18]. Since specific IgE levels are only partially predictive for clinical allergy [19], we determined the allergenic potency of the domains by mediator release assays using RBL cells passively sensitized with patients’ serum IgE. We detected a reduction in the in vivo allergenicity for all domains, which correlated well with the low in vitro IgE-binding activity. This reduction in the allergenic potency and IgE reactivity of the constructs indicated that the deletion of the N-terminal part of either PL allergen could result in the disruption of IgE-binding epitopes [12].
The efficacy of AIT has been associated with induction of a regulatory T cell response, immune deviation to a balanced TH2/TH1 type, or both [20–22]. Hence, the preserved T cell immunogenicity is thought to be a requirement for successful AIT. We compared the T cell reactivity of equimolar concentrations of the natural and the recombinant proteins by stimulation of PBMC or TCLs from allergic individuals. From the experiments, it became evident that the recombinant molecules were able to induce an allergen-specific T lymphocyte activation. These results demonstrate a retained T cell reactivity, which led to the conclusion that Amb a 1α, Art v 6α, and the hybrid harbour the majority of the T cell epitope repertoire of the natural PL allergens.
The induction of allergen-specific IgG antibodies, able to block allergic patients’ IgE binding and hence inhibit IgE-mediated effector cell degranulation, T-cell activation, and boosting of IgE production, is considered a hallmark for the clinical success of AIT [1–3]. Noteworthy, Amb a 1α, Art v 6α, and the hybrid contained antibody epitopes involved in the induction of IgG antibodies as demonstrated in our mouse model.
It is important to notice that in our animal model the strong reduction of allergenicity and the preservation of immunogenicity of the domains are in consonance with the reduced allergenic potency in humans that we observed. Further, the capacity of the murine Amb a 1α, Art v 6α, and hybrid antisera to significantly inhibit binding of human IgE to nAmb a 1 from 5 allergic patients has been demonstrated. However, whereas the blocking of allergic patients’ IgE binding to nArt v 6 by antibodies induced with the domains was comparable to that of the natural allergens, antiserum from mice immunised with the domains had a significantly lower blocking capacity for Amb a 1-specific IgE. The fact that the domains represent only 2/3 of the sequence of Amb a 1 might be one explanation for this finding. Of note, a generally low inhibitory capacity of murine anti-nAmb a 1 or anti-nArt v 6 IgG (56% and 20%, respectively) was observed, which could be an indication that the murine immune response towards PL allergens is quite distinct from the human allergic response. These results could however be biased by the fact that an adjuvant was used in the murine immunization schedule resulting in differences in allergen presentation or processing by mice and humans, which are exposed in a completely different manner [23,24]. Consequently, future studies addressing allergen uptake and processing by dendritic cells in the presence of adjuvants would be beneficial for the design of effective allergy vaccines.
Besides epitope modifying effects the adjuvant ALUM may also bias the subsequent immune response on the T cell level. Here were measured a TH2-polarizing effect of ALUM, indicated by the production of IL-4, IL-5 and IL-13. Analyses of murine splenocytes revealed the induction of TH1 cells producing IFN- γ by the recombinant proteins. In other words, a mixed TH1/TH2 immune response was elicited against Amb a 1α, Art v 6α, and hybrid compared to a clear TH2-driven response induced by the natural proteins.
Concomitant allergies to ragweed and mugwort pollen are a well-recognized problem in areas where both plants are endemic, where it is difficult to distinguish between co-sensitization and cross-reactivity [25]. Amb a 1 as well as the major mugwort pollen allergen Art v 1, a member of the defensin-like allergen family, have been suggested as marker allergens for the diagnostic workup [8,10]. Nevertheless, cross-reactive allergens such as members of the PL family represent a problem for patients and clinicians. It is still not clear whether a therapeutic intervention against Amb a 1 would lead to a simultaneous improvement of Art v 6 driven allergic reactions and vice versa. However, with our study results we suggest that a single allergen derivative might be sufficient for a concomitant treatment strategy of PL mediated allergies form the Asteraceae family.
Conclusion
In summary, the accumulation of T cell epitopes and the deletion of IgE reactive areas of the PL allergens Amb a 1 and Art v 6 resulted in the generation of highly immunogenic domains of both proteins. This led to the development of a hybrid molecule consisting of the combination of Amb a 1 and Art v 6 C-terminal regions. The domains were able to induce lymphoproliferative responses in ragweed/mugwort pollen-allergic patients´ PBMCs and displayed low IgE reactivity and in vitro allergenicity. These results in humans correlated with results gained from a murine immunization model where Amb a 1α, Art v 6α, and hybrid were compared to wildtype allergens. Moreover, the single domains seemed sufficient to induce robust levels of IgG antibodies cross-reactive with the full-length WT allergens. Thus, based on our results we successfully generated candidates for AIT to redirect the allergic immune response supporting the idea of using only the alpha chain domain of Asteraceae PL allergens.
Supporting Information
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by the European Commission Marie Curie Actions-Intra-European Fellowships Project PIEF-GA-2009-253281 (http://ec.europa.eu/research/mariecurieactions/index_en.htm) AIS; the Christian Doppler Laboratory (https://www.uni-salzburg.at/index.php?id=25814&L=1) BB, BN, BJS, MW, M. Himly, FF, CA, M. Hause; the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) project SFB F4610) (https://www.fwf.ac.at/en/) BB, BN, BJS, MW, M. Himly, FF, CA, M. Hause, CE, and the Sparkling Science Project Bio KoSMoS SPA-193) (https://www.sparklingscience.at/) MW.
References
- 1.Akdis CA, Akdis M. Mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127: 18–27. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.11.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Flicker S, Gadermaier E, Madritsch C, Valenta R. Passive Immunization with Allergen-Specific Antibodies. In: Valenta R, Coffman RL, editors. Vaccines against Allergies. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2011. pp. 141–159. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/82_2011_143 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Valenta R, Campana R, Marth K, van Hage M. Allergen-specific immunotherapy: from therapeutic vaccines to prophylactic approaches: Review: Allergen-specific immunotherapy. J Intern Med. 2012;272: 144–157. 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2012.02556.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gentile D, Skoner DP. Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients with Allergic Rhinoconjunctivitis. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2011;11: 131–138. 10.1007/s11882-011-0176-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wallner M, Pichler U, Ferreira F. Recombinant allergens for pollen immunotherapy. Immunotherapy. 2013;5: 1323–1338. 10.2217/imt.13.114 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Arbes SJ, Gergen PJ, Elliott L, Zeldin DC. Prevalences of positive skin test responses to 10 common allergens in the US population: results from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2005;116: 377–383. 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.05.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Burbach GJ, Heinzerling LM, Röhnelt C, Bergmann K-C, Behrendt H, Zuberbier T. Ragweed sensitization in Europe—GA 2 LEN study suggests increasing prevalence. Allergy. 2009;64: 664–665. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01975.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Asero R, Bellotto E, Ghiani A, Aina R, Villalta D, Citterio S. Concomitant sensitization to ragweed and mugwort pollen: who is who in clinical allergy? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014;113: 307–313. 10.1016/j.anai.2014.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Salo PM, Calatroni A, Gergen PJ, Hoppin JA, Sever ML, Jaramillo R, et al. Allergy-related outcomes in relation to serum IgE: Results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005–2006. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127: 1226–1235.e7. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wopfner N, Gadermaier G, Egger M, Asero R, Ebner C, Jahn-Schmid B, et al. The spectrum of allergens in ragweed and mugwort pollen. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2005;138: 337–346. 10.1159/000089188 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jahn-Schmid B, Hauser M, Wopfner N, Briza P, Berger UE, Asero R, et al. Humoral and Cellular Cross-Reactivity between Amb a 1, the Major Ragweed Pollen Allergen, and Its Mugwort Homolog Art v 6. J Immunol. 2012;188: 1559–1567. 10.4049/jimmunol.1102445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wopfner N, Jahn-Schmid B, Schmidt G, Christ T, Hubinger G, Briza P, et al. The alpha and beta subchain of Amb a 1, the major ragweed-pollen allergen show divergent reactivity at the IgE and T-cell level. Mol Immunol. 2009;46: 2090–2097. 10.1016/j.molimm.2009.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jahn-Schmid B, Wopfner N, Hubinger G, Asero R, Ebner C, Ferreira F, et al. The T-cell response to Amb a 1 is characterized by 3 dominant epitopes and multiple MHC restriction elements. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126: 1068–1071.e2. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.05.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kanter U, Heller W, Durner J, Winkler JB, Engel M, Behrendt H, et al. Molecular and Immunological Characterization of Ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia L.) Pollen after Exposure of the Plants to Elevated Ozone over a Whole Growing Season. Pandey GK, editor. PLoS ONE. 2013;8: e61518 10.1371/journal.pone.0061518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Himly M, Nony E, Chabre H, Van Overtvelt L, Neubauer A, van Ree R, et al. Standardization of allergen products: 1. Detailed characterization of GMP-produced recombinant Bet v 1.0101 as biological reference preparation. Allergy. 2009;64: 1038–1045. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.01957.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Wallner M, Hauser M, Himly M, Zaborsky N, Mutschlechner S, Harrer A, et al. Reshaping the Bet v 1 fold modulates TH polarization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2011;127: 1571–1578.e9. 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.064 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vogel L, Lüttkopf D, Hatahet L, Haustein D, Vieths S. Development of a functional in vitro assay as a novel tool for the standardization of allergen extracts in the human system. Allergy. 2005;60: 1021–1028. 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2005.00803.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pichler U, Hauser M, Hofer H, Himly M, Hoflehner E, Steiner M, et al. Allergen hybrids—next generation vaccines for Fagales pollen immunotherapy. Clin Exp Allergy J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014;44: 438–449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Asero R, Arena A, Cecchi L, Conte ME, Crivellaro M, Emiliani F, et al. Are IgE levels to foods other than rosaceae predictive of allergy in lipid transfer protein-hypersensitive patients? Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2011;155: 149–154. 10.1159/000318864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Larché M, Akdis CA, Valenta R. Immunological mechanisms of allergen-specific immunotherapy. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6: 761–771. 10.1038/nri1934 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bohle B. T cell responses during allergen-specific immunotherapy of Type I allergy. Front Biosci J Virtual Libr. 2008;13: 6079–6085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Akdis M, Akdis CA. Therapeutic manipulation of immune tolerance in allergic disease. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009;8: 645–660. 10.1038/nrd2653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hogenesch H. Mechanism of immunopotentiation and safety of aluminum adjuvants. Front Immunol. 2012;3: 406 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00406 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kool M, Hammad H, Lambrecht BN. Cellular networks controlling Th2 polarization in allergy and immunity. F1000 Biol Rep. 2012;4: 6 10.3410/B4-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Asero R, Wopfner N, Gruber P, Gadermaier G, Ferreira F. Artemisia and Ambrosia hypersensitivity: co-sensitization or co-recognition? Clin Exp Allergy J Br Soc Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;36: 658–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.