Summary
Rhodopsin is currently the only available atomic-resolution template for understanding biological functions of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) family. The structural basis for the phenomenal dark state stability of 11-cis-retinal bound to rhodopsin and its ultrafast photoreaction are active topics of research. In particular, the β-ionone ring of the retinylidene inverse agonist is crucial for the activation mechanism. We analyzed a total of 23 independent, 100-ns all-atom molecular dynamics simulations for rhodopsin embedded in a lipid bilayer in the microcanonical (N,V,E) ensemble. Analysis of intramolecular fluctuations predicts hydrogen-out-of-plane (HOOP) wagging modes of retinal consistent with those found in Raman vibrational spectroscopy. We show that sampling and ergodicity of the ensemble of simulations are crucial for determining the distribution of conformers of retinal bound to rhodopsin. The polyene chain is rigidly locked into a single, twisted conformation, consistent with the function of retinal as an inverse agonist in the dark state. Most surprisingly, the β-ionone ring is mobile within its binding pocket; interactions are nonspecific and the cavity is sufficiently large to enable structural heterogeneity. We find that retinal occupies two distinct conformations in the dark state, contrary to most previous assumptions. The β-ionone ring can rotate relative to the polyene chain, thereby populating both positively and negatively twisted 6-s-cis enantiomers. This result, while unexpected, strongly agrees with experimental solid-state 2H NMR spectra. Correlation analysis identifies the residues most critical to controlling mobility of retinal; we find that Trp265 moves away from the ionone ring prior to any conformational transition. Our findings reinforce how molecular dynamics simulations can challenge conventional assumptions for interpreting experimental data, especially where existing models neglect conformational fluctuations.
Keywords: G protein-coupled receptor, Molecular dynamics, Retinal, Rhodopsin, Vision
Graphical Abstract
Cover. Structure of retinal ligand of G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin in the inverse agonist form as obtained from molecular simulations.
Introduction
G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) constitute the largest superfamily of proteins in the human genome, and they initiate many signal transduction pathways1–3. This class of proteins is of enormous pharmaceutical interest4,5, because over 50% of recently launched drugs are targeted to GPCRs with annual worldwide sales exceeding $30 billion6. As with many membrane proteins it is typically quite difficult to express and characterize GPCRs. The exception is rhodopsin, the primary dim light receptor, which is the only GPCR whose atomic-level structure has been published7–10. A great deal of effort has been put into developing our understanding of rhodopsin function11–20, both for its own sake and as a template to explain activation of other GPCRs3. In this article we address the general problem of protein-ligand interactions in GPCRs in relation to their agonist and inverse agonist or antagonist roles. Specifically, we investigated the basis for the phenomenal dark state stability and activation of 11-cis retinal bound to rhodopsin at the single molecule level using an ensemble of molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Our findings yield a deeper understanding of the structural basis for dark state retinal bound to rhodopsin, with potential insights into GPCR activation in general3.
The light-absorbing moiety 11-cis retinal of rhodopsin is bound by a protonated Schiff base linkage to the side chain of Lys296. In its 11-cis conformation, retinal functions as a strong inverse agonist21, virtually locking the protein in the inactive state. Remarkably, upon absorbing a photon it instantly isomerizes (within 200 fs17,22) to the all-trans state, and subsequently becomes an agonist13,14. The protein relaxes through a series of spectroscopically defined intermediates23 until it reaches the MI state, which exists in equilibrium with the active MII state13,14,16,18. The central role of retinal in directing this relaxation and promoting MII formation has been extensively investigated by a number of approaches. Studies of rhodopsin regenerated with chemically modified retinals as well as rhodopsin mutants show that specific interactions between retinal and the binding pocket of the receptor are implicated both in rhodopsin pigment formation and receptor activation13,16,24. Most of the altered ligands are less effective agonists in the all-trans state, shifting the MI–MII equilibrium back toward MI25–27. The C9 methyl group distal to the retinylidene Schiff base of Lys296 is known to play an essential role25,27,28. Moreover, the β-ionone ring of retinal is crucially important for rhodopsin activation26,29,30. While the flexibility of dark state retinal has not been addressed specifically in the literature, some studies have postulated that the β-ionone ring is the more dynamic region of the retinal molecule31. For example, 2H NMR results have been published suggesting both a 6-s-trans32 and 6-s-cis33 conformation. Recent experiments, including a 2.2 Å crystal structure of rhodopsin9 and solid state 13C NMR measurements31, suggest the β-ionone ring is in a negatively twisted 6-s-cis conformation. Nonetheless, there is some ambiguity in interpreting these results since in the crystal structure retinal has severe steric clashes, while the 13C NMR experiments cannot differentiate between negatively and positively twisted enantiomers.
In addition to experimental studies, computational approaches, including molecular mechanics and quantum mechanical calculations, have been applied to understand the behavior of rhodopsin34–37. Although several calculations have focused on the structure of the retinal38, none considered the possibility of multiple retinal conformers. In part, this is because such transitions occur very rarely on the time scale of typical molecular dynamics calculations. Here we show that by utilizing an ensemble of MD simulations, we are able to relate the temporal dynamics of retinal in dark state rhodopsin to solid-state 2H NMR and resonance Raman data17,33. By conducting multiple MD simulations, with independent starting membrane configurations, we more effectively sample the conformational space of the retinylidene ligand of rhodopsin. The results of individual simulations differ significantly, indicating they are not long enough to be compared directly to experimental results on an individual basis. Yet when taken as an ensemble, the simulations produce theoretical 2H NMR spectra in excellent agreement with the experiment33. The data clearly show that retinal undergoes fluctuations on timescales comparable to the simulation trajectories. A model including multiple retinal conformations in the dark state is most consistent with experimental measurements. The picture that emerges suggests specific interactions with the polyene chain and the protonated Schiff base; but more surprisingly, nonspecific interactions with the ionone ring allow the binding pocket to accommodate conformational heterogeneity that may optimize receptor activation.
Results
A total of 23 independently equilibrated MD simulations of 100-ns duration were carried out for a single rhodopsin molecule embedded in a fully hydrated bilayer of native-like phospholipids comprising SPDE/SDPC/cholesterol (50:49:24). Simulations were conducted in the microcanonical (N,V,E) ensemble using the atomic-level structure of rhodopsin (PDB code 1U19)9 shown in Figure 1(a). The 11-cis retinal chromophore of rhodopsin is bound through a protonated Schiff base linkage to Lys296, cf. Figure 1(b). Gas phase quantum chemical39 and molecular mechanics calculations indicate three stable rotamers for the C6–C7 torsion angle which defines the orientation of the β-ionone ring relative to the polyene backbone. These include a skewed 6-s-trans conformation (χ ≈ 160°), a negatively twisted 6-s-cis conformer (χ ≈ −60°), and a positively twisted 6-s-cis conformer (χ ≈ 55°). The most recent crystal structure of rhodopsin9 reports a C6–C7 torsion angle of −34°, quite far from any minima in the potential energy surface. However, interpreting this structure is problematic at best because of steric clashes between the C8- and C5-methyl (C18) hydrogens. The discrepancy could in part be due to the fact that crystallography averages away thermal motion to produce only a single structure. By contrast, MD simulations directly reveal conformational heterogeneity that would be hidden experimentally. We were able to interpret experimental results, including hydrogen-out-of-plane (HOOP) wagging modes from Raman vibrational spectroscopy17 and solid state 2H NMR spectra33, cf. Figures 1(c)–(d), in terms of multiple conformers of the retinal ligand bound to rhodopsin. Comparison was made to detailed experimental data in all cases17,33,40,41.
Hydrogen-out-of-plane wagging modes are identified in simulations
Unlike NMR and X-ray methods, Raman spectroscopy probes the fluctuations arising from molecular vibrations. These fluctuations are extremely sensitive to conformational changes in retinal, and can serve as an indicator of the different photointermediates42. In dark-state rhodopsin, a peak at 969 cm−1 is assigned to concerted HOOP wagging motions of the C11 and C12 hydrogens17. Upon photoactivation, the frequency of this mode shifts significantly. When we characterized the retinal fluctuations in our simulations using principal component analysis, we observed an analogous vibrational mode with a frequency of 910 cm−1 that is depicted in Figure 1(c) (see Methods for details). Given the difficulties in reproducing vibrational spectra using classical molecular mechanics force fields, a 10% discrepancy between simulation and experiment is impressive. We performed this calculation separately for retinals in both the negatively and positively twisted conformations, and found that they produced similar modes at the same frequency, suggesting that this vibrational mode is independent of the conformation of β-ionone ring. As a result, the Raman experiments do not differentiate between the two conformations.
Multiple β -ionone ring conformations are consistent with 2H NMR data
In solid state NMR spectroscopy, molecular interactions are measured through angular and distance restraints, giving both structrure and dynamics. Salgado et al.33 reported 2H NMR spectra of aligned recombinant membranes containing rhodopsin regenerated with retinal deuterated at the C5, C9, or C13 methyl positions. By varying the membrane tilt angle with respect to the magnetic field, they obtained detailed information about the orientation θB for the individual retinylidene C–C2H3 bonds. Data were analyzed by assuming a single orientation for each methyl group. In the present work, we adopted a different strategy and used the simulation results to predict the 2H NMR spectra. We did this by using the probability distribution from the MD simulations to compile a weighted-average spectrum in terms of theoretical spectra for each bond orientation43. The results are shown in Figure 1(d). The C5–C2H3 bond axis distribution is particularly important, because changes in the C6–C7 torsion angle report on the β-ionone ring conformation. As shown in Figure 1(d), the spectrum computed from the simulation matches the experiment extremely well. Interestingly, the probability distribution contains significant contributions from distinct conformations whose 2H NMR spectra differ greatly from experiment (see below). The simulated spectra are most similar to experiment when computed from the probability distribution derived directly from the combined MD simulations. For completeness, we performed the same analysis for the C9 and C13 methyl groups, as also shown in Figure 1(d), where the simulations predict a single dominant conformer consistent with the crystal structure. The fact that the spectra agree well in all cases lends support to the idea that the β-ionone ring has more than one conformation in the dark-state rhodopsin binding pocket.
Flexibility of retinal ligand is illuminated by large-scale simulations
Turning next to the issue of the β-ionone ring conformation, Figure 2(a) shows the distribution of the C6–C7 torsion angles compiled from all 23 simulations. Two 6-s-cis conformers are populated, with the negatively twisted (χ ≈ −60°) conformer predominating, but with a significant probability for the positively twisted (χ ≈ +70°) conformation. Gas phase computations indicate equal probability for the two 6-s-cis conformers, suggesting that the asymmetry in the distribution for the β-ionone ring of retinal when bound to rhodopsin is most likely due to interactions with the surrounding protein side chains. Previous experiments using chemically modified ligands have demonstrated that the binding cavity differentiates between retinal enantiomers16,40. Our MD simulations imply that the cavity has a moderate selectivity for the negatively twisted enantiomer, yielding positive ellipticity in circular dichroism (CD) spectra consistent with experimental data40.
The conformation of the β-ionone ring has also been investigated through measurements of the C8-to-C18 distance using solid-state rotational resonance 13C NMR spectroscopy31. In Figure 2(b) the probability distribution for the C8-to-C18 carbon distance is plotted as a function of the C6–C7 torsion angle obtained in the simulations. Figure 2(b) clearly demonstrates that the distance is correlated with the β-ionone ring orientation; it also shows that the distance is governed solely by the magnitude of the 6-s-cis skew and not the sign, due to the mirror image symmetry of the two enantiomers. As a direct result, the rotational resonance experiment cannot distinguish between the positively and negatively twisted conformers. Moreover, the C8-to-C18 distance varies over a large range, from approximately 3.0 Å to 4.5 Å, with the smaller distances corresponding to a conformation in the 6-s-cis region, and the larger distances representing the 6-s-trans region. For a particular value of the C6–C7 torsion, there are substantial variations in the observed C8-to-C18 internuclear distances, arising from fluctuations in bond angles and bond lengths. This is important when using the distance from NMR as a restraint for the conformation of retinal, because the distance for a single conformer will in general differ from that computed by averaging over the conformational fluctuations. Figure 2(c) shows representative C6–C7 torsion angle distributions from individual simulations, which are further discussed below.
We now shift our focus to the conformation of the polyene moiety of the retinylidene chromophore within the binding cavity of the photoreceptor, showing in Figure 3 the probability distributions for the torsion angles along the entire conjugated chain. In contrast to the C6–C7 dihedral angle, the torsions in the polyene chain all have narrow unimodal distributions, indicating that it exists in a single well-defined state. All the torsion angles (C7 to C15) are in the trans conformation, except the C11=C12 bond which is in the cis conformation. Any concerted deviation from planarity is an indication of strain induced by the protein environment, and may strongly alter the photochemistry of the polyene chain. For retinal bound to rhodopsin, the two torsions adjacent to the cis-double bond are significantly perturbed from their planar state; the C10–C11 torsion angle is 164±12° and the C12–C13 torsion angle is 161±9°, in accord with 2H NMR data for rhodopsin in the dark state33. The torsional deformation alleviates the steric clashes between the C13-methyl group and the H10 hydrogen38. Results of the MD simulations are generally consistent with three planes of unsaturation for retinal within the binding cavity of rhodopsin16,33,41, a model previously used to interpret 2H NMR results33.
Sampling and ergodicity are established through multiple trajectories
Although the polyene chain of the retinylidene chromophore occupies a single well-defined conformation, the ensemble of MD simulations reveals that the β-ionone ring populates two distinct enantiomers, cf. Figure 2(a). Previous MD and QM/MM simulations did not report multiple retinal conformations9,34,35,44, most likely due to limitations in time scale. Based on the number of transitions in our simulations, the lifetimes of the two conformers are ≈50 ns, comparable to the longest of the other trajectories. Because transitions are rare events, the probability distributions for independent trajectories differ significantly, indicating that the 100-ns timescale is not long enough to allow statistical convergence. This point is best seen in Figure 2(c), which shows probability distributions from three of the 23 trajectories. These differences highlight the risks involved in interpreting a single trajectory, no matter how long, when the system may contain long-lived states. For any given trajectory, the C6–C7 torsion angle undergoes only a small number of transitions. Indeed, in several simulations the torsion remains in its initial conformation throughout the trajectory, with no transitions at all. In others, there is a single transition leading to a positively twisted conformation, and still others show a number of transitions back and forth.
As noted above, trajectories where the retinal primarily samples the positive-twisted conformation produce 2H NMR spectra that bear little resemblance to the experimental ones; interpreted by themselves, they would lead us to conclude that the simulations and experiments were fundamentally inconsistent. On the other hand, combining the positive 6-s-cis conformers with the negatively twisted state, using the ensemble of simulations to provide the weighting, improves the fit to experimental data33 versus the negatively twisted state alone. It is only by interpreting the ensemble average of the simulations in accord with the ergodic hypothesis that we are able to conclude that there are multiple important conformations within the actual distribution. To illustrate this aspect further, Figure 4 shows 2H NMR spectra calculated by restricting the angular range of the probability distribution from all 23 simulations. Part (a) considers only values of the C6–C7 torsion angle < −70°; whereas part (b) only includes angles > −70°, with the entire distribution indicated in part (c). As can be seen, considering only a part of the distribution leads to very poor agreement of the synthetic spectra with the experimental 2H NMR data; yet when the entire distribution is included the agreement is more gratifying (cf. Figure 1).
Contact residues of β -ionone ring depend on its conformation
To assess the change in protein environment due to isomerization about the C6–C7 bond, we mapped the interactions of the three retinal methyl carbons (C5, C9, and C13) with the neighboring protein residues. Specifically, we identified the amino acid residues found within a 4 Å sphere about each methyl carbon in each of the 23 simulations. For each simulation, we constructed a vector containing the probability that a selected region of retinal formed a contact with each residue, and combined them to form a contact probability matrix C. The average contact probability for each residue was computed over all 23 simulations and subtracted from each column of the C matrix, producing a fluctuation matrix. The covariance matrix V = CTC was then constructed, where CT is the transposed contact matrix. Covariance matrices for each of the methyl groups are represented in Figure 5(a)–(c), and allow one to compare the trajectories and identify patterns in ligand-protein interaction. Figure 5(a) shows V for the C5-methyl, the most mobile of the three due to its location on the β-ionone ring. This map can be divided into three different blocks, giving three characteristic distributions of the C6–C7 torsion: (i) simulations 1–11, which mostly populate the negatively twisted 6-s-cis, (ii) simulations 12–15, where both positively and negatively twisted states are populated, and (iii) simulations 16–23, where the positively twisted state predominates. The simulations in each group are strongly correlated with each other, and anti-correlated with those in the other groups, indicating that the torsional state directly modulates the residues which interact with the ligand. In contrast, the covariance matrix for the C9-methyl and C13-methyl groups in Figures 5(b) and 4(c) are featureless, meaning that fluctuations of these bonds do not alter interactions of retinal with its environment.
To further enumerate the important residues in contact with the C5-methyl group, we present its contact matrix in Figure 5(d). Note that Thr118, Gly121, and Glu122 appear frequently in simulations in the first category, while residues Phe208, Tyr268, and Ala269 are often in close proximity to the C5-methyl for simulations in the third category. Residues in contact with the C9- and C13-methyls are shown in Figures 5(e) and 4(f). Streaks of the same color are observed across all 23 simulations, indicating that the presence or absence of a particular residue is consistent from one simulation to another. Most striking is the close proximity of Ile189 to the C9 methyl group across all simulations. The closest residues to the C13 methyl are Ala117, Trp265, Tyr268, Ala292, and Ala295. It follows that the polyene chain segments occupy well-defined binding sites, which may account for the phenomenal dark state stability of retinal acting as an inverse agonist. By contrast, the binding site of the β-ionone ring is not as well defined, presumably due to relatively nonselective interactions consistent with a pocket of moderate to low specificity16.
Trp265 inhibits 6-s-trans retinal formation within the binding pocket
The residue Trp265 is highly conserved across the GPCR family A, and is thought to be involved in ligand binding. Interactions between the Trp265 sidechain and the β-ionone ring in rhodopsin are implicated in the inverse agonist role of retinal20,24. Consistent with this interpretation, Figure 6(a) indicates that Trp265 is usually packed against retinal, specifically the ionone ring. With this in mind, we attempted to relate motions of Trp265 to conformational transitions of the retinal C6–C7 torsion angle. Examination of the probability distribution for the C6–C7 torsion, Figure 2(a), shows that the primary path between the two twisted 6-s-cis states is via the 6-s-trans state. Hence the trans state can be used as an indicator of retinal conformational transitions. By examining the time correlation function between the presence of the trans state and the distance between the β-ionone ring and Trp265, Figure 6(b), we can interpret the functional significance of these interactions. Specifically, we computed C(t) = 〈[d(t+τ)– 〈d〉] [ϑ (t)– 〈ϑ〉]〉 where d(t) is the instantaneous distance, and ϑ(t) is an indicator function that is unity when the C6–C7 torsion is greater than 120° or less than −120°, and zero otherwise. Here 〈d〉 and 〈ϑ〉 denote averaging over all times in all simulations.
We computed this correlation function independently for each of the 19 trajectories in which we found the trans state. Figure 6(b) shows the average of these correlation functions (the error bars are the standard error, computed as , where σ is the standard deviation and N is the number of simulations). The correlation function has a statistically significant positive peak at τ = −1 ns (the resolution of the time series used to construct the correlations), indicating that on average the formation of the trans state is preceded by an increase in the distance between Trp265 and the β-ionone ring. It appears that conformational transitions between the two twisted 6-s-cis conformers are inhibited by the presence of Trp265 in its normal configuration. To further test this idea, we ran a short simulation in which we mutated Trp265 to glycine in silico. In this trajectory, we saw a significant population of 6-s-trans retinal, in contrast to the < 1% population in the primary simulations. This may have functional implications, as previous work24 suggests that rhodopsin activation moves the β-ionone group away from Trp265 toward Ala169.
Discussion
The present work shows that all-atom MD simulations provide an important framework for relating the temporal fluctuations of retinal to its biological activity. Upon photon absorption by rhodopsin, the retinal cofactor isomerizes to the trans form of the polyene, which drives non-equilibrium relaxation of the protein from the dark state toward the inactive MI state. In MI, trans-retinal acts as an agonist, shifting the MI-MII equilibrium toward the active MII state, which binds the G protein transducin and initiates visual perception13,14,16. Besides the polyene chain of retinal, the β-ionone ring in particular is crucial to the reaction mechanism20,26,29,30,45–47. The β-ionone ring is connected with protein movements that yield receptor activation14,20,48–50, following release of the spring-loaded conformational switch of the polyene. The torsion about the C6–C7 bond defines the orientation of the β-ionone ring relative to the polyene chain. Free retinal has been shown with both experimental51 and computational39 methods to exist as multiple isomers represented by 6-s-cis and 6-s-trans states, which is consistent with CD data40,41,52. By contrast, the retinal conformation becomes more restricted upon binding to rhodopsin, where it functions as an inverse agonist. It is interesting that in both bacteriorhodopsin51,53 and sensory rhodopsin,54 retinal is 6-s-trans; while in dark-adapted rhodopsin it is widely thought to adopt the 6-s-cis conformation33,40,55.
Activation mechanism of the GPCR prototype rhodopsin
An understanding of why nature has selected distinct conformations of retinal for different receptors may provide additional insights into the activation mechanism of rhodopsin33,56. As a step in this direction, we have used MD simulations to explore protein-ligand interactions and flexibility of retinal within the binding pocket of dark state rhodopsin. Our simulations are complementary to bioorganic16,40,41 and biophysical17,32,33 approaches, and aid the interpretation of experimental data. Binding of retinal to opsin leads to significant rotary strength in CD spectroscopy due to twisting of the chromophore57. A sign reversal is evident in bathorhodopsin, followed by a diminution in the subsequent intermediates52. Investigations of rhodopsin with chemically modified ligands further indicate how specific interactions of retinal within its binding cavity are connected with its dark state stability, as well as activation of the receptor. Removal of the C9-methyl group appears to increase ligand flexibility in the binding pocket. The absence of HOOP modes in FTIR spectra for MI indicates the C10-to-C13 region has relaxed to a more planar conformation, which only occurs in MII for natural retinal25. A back shifting of the MI–MII equilibrium is evident leading to reduced G protein activation 25. Opening the retinal ionone ring in acyclic analogs similarly reduces the stability of MII relative to MI26,29,45, although in this case the MI state appears to differ structurally from that formed with unmodified retinal26. Such acyclic modifications also eliminate the MI HOOP modes, thus implicating the ring structure in transmitting force from the all-trans retinal ligand to the protein.
The current simulations show that the polyene chain of retinal is rigidly locked into a single, twisted conformation when bound to rhodopsin, consistent with its role as an inverse agonist in the dark state. However, interactions of the β-ionone ring within its binding pocket are nonspecific, and the cavity is large enough to allow conformational heterogeneity. It follows that activation of rhodopsin can be considered in terms of three (sub)sites for binding of the ligand to the receptor16,25,33,38. These correspond to (i) the protonated Schiff base and its associated counterion14,58–60, (ii) the mid-portion of the polyene chain25,28, and lastly (iii) the β-ionone ring within its hydrophobic binding pocket31,33. The three sites are specifically probed by 2H NMR of the C13, C9, and C5 methyl groups, respectively32,33. In the dark state, the retinal polyene chain is under considerable strain, as indicated by the HOOP modes measured by stimulated Raman17 or FTIR26 spectroscopy, and by 2H NMR of the C9 and C13 methyl groups33. The HOOP modes shift their frequencies in the MI state of native rhodopsin, but disappear in MII. Likewise, solid-state 2H NMR demonstrates a reduction of the twist of retinal in MI61. This finding suggests that the polyene strain is used to drive the large-scale protein rearrangements that occur in the MII state14. It is logical to consider the ring as necessary to anchor retinal to the protein, guaranteeing that retinal relaxation induces protein reorganization and gives active photoreceptor. Our work predicts that, contrary to previous assumptions, retinal populates more than one stable conformation under physiological conditions. The strongest evidence for the existence of multiple conformers is the excellent agreement between the experimental 2H NMR spectra and those computed directly from the distribution of bond orientations observed in the MD simulations. There are additional indications of such conformational heterogeneity from rotational resonance 13C NMR31 and FTIR62 spectroscopy.
Conformational flexibility of retinal in the inverse agonist state
Multiple retinal conformations31 could be important for understanding conflicting reports in the literature that address isomerization of the β -ionone ring32–34,38,40,55,63. Up until now, most investigators have assumed that the β-ionone ring of retinal adopts a single conformer. Biophysical studies using 2H NMR32,33, 13C NMR64, and CD40 spectroscopy have been interpreted in terms of only one isomer of the β-ionone ring. By contrast, MD simulations suggest that retinal may populate different conformers while bound to rhodopsin. Our results imply that the net positive ellipticity of the dark state of rhodopsin40,41,52 originates from an enantiomeric excess of the negative isomer. The presence of symmetric conformers with both negative and positive C6–C7 torsional angles is not detectable by 13C NMR studies31,64. As a result, previous interpretations of structural data indicating a single negatively twisted 6-s-cis conformation -- while natural in light of the X-ray crystal structure -- may be incomplete. Although the C9- and C13-methyls undergo only small librations, and consistently interact with the same parts of the protein, the flexibility of the C6–C7 torsion enables the C5-methyl to interact with a more diverse set of residues. Interestingly, these internal motions do not significantly alter the overall shape of the binding pocket. Figure 7 shows the two primary retinal conformations found in this work superposed in the context of the protein cavity. Only minor local displacements of individual amino acid residues are necessary to accommodate the retinal conformational transitions. More importantly, specific interactions selecting only one of the enantiomers are apparently absent, despite the highly tuned function of rhodopsin.
Our findings highlight the importance of performing multiple MD simulations to effectively explore conformational space with fewer assumptions and assess convergence. In particular, the correlation between the motions of Trp265 and the retinal could not be assessed from a single trajectory; it was only by examining an ensemble with a significant number of independent transitions that the pattern became apparent. The danger of analyzing a single trajectory is that the system may be undersampled due to the limited duration, the large number of accessible states, and the relatively long lifetimes of individual conformations. The situation is exactly analogous to an issue that arises when analyzing single molecule experiments. Any single measurement may appear inconsistent with a bulk measurement, because an individual molecule may be found in states far from the mean of the population65,66. Consequently, the experiments must be repeated many times in order to obtain dependable statistical information, which directly parallels the computational approach taken here. We further note there are important long-timescale fluctuations of retinal so that the simulations may not necessarily be ergodic. (The ergodic hypothesis states that the time average for any one member of an ensemble is equivalent to the ensemble average at any one instant.) These statistical fluctuations are manifested as significant variations in the distribution of retinal conformers. Sampling from a number of independently equilibrated systems allows us to more closely estimate the actual molecular properties, while accurately assessing the degree of statistical convergence. However, we cannot discount the possibility that even the ensemble of simulations taken together do not represent a fully converged probability distribution for the conformation of retinal. In each simulation, the retinal was initially placed in the negatively twisted form, as suggest by the crystal structure. While this is clearly the most tenable choice, the resulting simulations may as a result overestimate the population of the negatively twisted form. Unfortunately, proving ergodicity from a finite set of data is extremely difficult, especially when the lifetime of some states is comparable to the length of the trajectories.
To conclude we propose the following mechanistic hypothesis: in the dark state, retinal acts as an inverse agonist by forming specific interactions through the polyene chain and protonated Schiff base. However, the ionone ring interactions are nonspecific, and the binding pocket is large enough to allow interconversion of positively- and negatively-twisted 6-s-cis conformers. This stands in contrast to previous analyses of crystallographic and NMR data, which implicitly assume a single representative conformation for retinal, yielding (perhaps for this reason) a structure with significant internal steric clashes. Our suggestion that retinal instead populates different twisted 6-s-cis enantiomers enables us to resolve this difficulty. The resulting probability distribution correctly reproduces experimental 2H NMR spectra, as well as resonance Raman data. In its 11-cis form, retinal is a strong inverse agonist and locks the dark state into an inactive conformation that accounts for its phenomenal stability. Since modification of the ionone ring generally diminishes activity, it may seem counterintuitive that interactions between the ionone ring and the receptor are nonspecific. Yet the exceptional agreement of the experimental spectra calculated from the simulation-derived conformational distributions supports multiple retinal conformers as our best model of dark state rhodopsin. Finally, the present results demonstrate that computer simulations can offer deep insights into the interpretation of experimental data, thus facilitating mechanistic models that correspondingly motivate future experiments.
Methods
Molecular Dynamics Simulations
System construction in the microcanonical (N,V,E,) ensemble is described in Grossfield et al. and its supplementary materials67. Briefly, each of the systems contained one rhodopsin molecule, 50 SDPE molecules, 49 SDPC molecules, 24 cholesterols, 14 sodium ions, 16 chloride ions, and 7400 waters (43 222 atoms total). Individual systems were embedded in a 56.5 × 79.2 × 95.5434 Å periodic box, with the membrane normal aligned along the z-axis. The CHARMM version 27 force field was used to represent the protein68 with parameters appropriate for retinal69, while the recently refined CHARMM saturated chain70, polyunsaturated chain71, and cholesterol72 parameters were used to describe the lipids. Construction and equilibration were performed using CHARMM2768,73, while production calculations were performed using Blue Matter74, a molecular dynamics package specially written to take advantage of the Blue Gene/L hardware74. The simulations described here were generally run on 512, 1024, or 2048 Blue Gene nodes, generating 4, 6, or 9 ns/day, respectively. However, due to improvements in the code, we are now able to generate roughly 40 ns/day using 4 Blue Gene racks (4096 nodes). It is worth noting that this performance significantly exceeds that of the most rigorous implicit membrane models75,76, albeit with a dramatically larger computational investment. Each of the simulations was constructed independently; we used the 1U19 PDB file for the protein initial coordinates, and regenerated new lipid conformations from a library of structures. As a result, the distribution of lipid species and cholesterol around the protein was fully randomized at the beginning of each trajectory. The initial locations of sodium and chloride ions in the aqueous region were also determined randomly at the beginning of each simulation. Independently regenerating the membrane starting structure is crucial to effective sampling, given the microsecond timescale for lateral reorganization of the lipid bilayer. For further details see Ref.67
The vibrational modes of the retinal were computed using the quasi-harmonic analysis facility within CHARMM. We computed the time-averaged structure from the trajectory, and then obtained the atomic fluctuations in rectangular Cartesian coordinates from the difference between the instantaneous structures and the average. The cross-correlation matrix of the fluctuations was computed and diagonalized to obtain the normal modes of the system. The normal mode associated with the HOOP motion was found by taking the scalar product of each normal mode vector with a test vector constructed by displacing H11 and H12 out of the plane of the cis-double bond. In each case, this procedure identified a single normal mode, whose overlap with the displacement vector was an order of magnitude greater than any other normal mode. Details of the computation of normal modes by quasi-harmonic analysis in CHARMM are described elsewhere77.
Calculation of 2H NMR spectral lineshapes
Theoretical 2H NMR lineshapes for specifically deuterated retinal bound to rhodopsin in aligned membrane bilayers were calculated as described33,43. Spectra were simulated for bond angles on a 1° grid; the final spectrum was then computed as the average of the individual spectra, weighted by their probability as computed from the combined molecular dynamics simulations. The mosaic spread of the membrane stack was treated as a free parameter. Further details are provided in Ref.33.
Acknowledgments
We thank W. Hubbell, K. Martínez-Mayorga, O. Miyashita, K. Nakanishi, A. Struts, F. Tama, and R. Vogel for valuable discussions. Members of the Blue Matter team including B. Fitch, R. Germain, A. Rayshubskiy, T. J. C. Ward, M. Eleftheriou, F. Suits, Y. Zhestkov, R. Zhou, J. Pitera, and W. Swope provided valuable support. S.E.F. acknowledges the NSF for funding through grant MCB-0091508 and is a Henry Dreyfus Teacher–Scholar. M.F.B. is grateful to the NIH for support from grant EY12049 and the NSF from grant CHE-607917.
Abbreviations used
- CD
circular dichroism
- FTIR
Fourier transform infrared
- GPCR
G protein-coupled receptor
- HOOP
hydrogen-out-of-plane
- MD
molecular dynamics
- MI
metarhodopsin I
- MII
metarhodopsin II
- PDB
Protein Data Bank
- QM/MM
quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics
- SPDC
1-stearoyl-2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine
- SDPE
1-stearoyl-2-docosahexaenoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine
Footnotes
Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
References
- 1.Bockaert J, Pin JP. Molecular tinkering of G protein-coupled receptors: an evolutionary success. EMBO J. 1999;18:1723–1729. doi: 10.1093/emboj/18.7.1723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pierce KL, Premont RT, Lefkowitz RJ. Seven-transmembrane receptors. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2002;3:639–650. doi: 10.1038/nrm908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Fanelli F, De Benedetti PG. Computational modeling approaches to structure-function analysis of G protein-coupled receptors. Chem. Rev. 2005;105:3297–3351. doi: 10.1021/cr000095n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.George SR, O'Dowd BF, Lee SR. G-protein-coupled receptor oligomerization and its potential for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2002;1:808–820. doi: 10.1038/nrd913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Watts A. Solid-state NMR in drug design and discovery for membrane-embedded targets. Nat. Rev. Drug Disc. 2005;4:555–568. doi: 10.1038/nrd1773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Drews J. Drug discovery: a historical perspective. Science. 2000;287:1960–1964. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5460.1960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Palczewski K, Kumasaka T, Hori T, Behnke CA, Motoshima H, Fox BA, et al. Crystal structure of rhodopsin: a G protein-coupled receptor. Science. 2000;289:739–745. doi: 10.1126/science.289.5480.739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Okada T, Fujiyoshi Y, Silow M, Navarro J, Landau EM, Shichida Y. Functional role of internal water molecules in rhodopsin revealed by x-ray crystallography. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002;99:5982–5987. doi: 10.1073/pnas.082666399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Okada T, Sugihara M, Bondar A-N, Elstner M, Entel P, Buss V. The retinal conformation and its environment in rhodopsin in light of a new 2.2 Å crystal structure. J. Mol. Biol. 2004;342:571–583. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.07.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Li J, Edwards PC, Burghammer M, Villa C, Schertler GFX. Structure of bovine rhodopsin in a trigonal crystal form. J. Mol. Biol. 2004;343:1409–1438. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Brown MF. Modulation of rhodopsin function by properties of the membrane bilayer. Chem. Phys. Lipids. 1994;73:159–180. doi: 10.1016/0009-3084(94)90180-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Szundi I, Mah TL, Lewis JW, Jäger S, Ernst OP, Hofmann KP, et al. Proton transfer reactions linked to rhodopsin activation. Biochemistry. 1998;37:14237–14244. doi: 10.1021/bi981249k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Sakmar TP, Menon ST, Marin EP, Awad ES. Rhodopsin: insights from recent structural studies. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 2002;31:443–484. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biophys.31.082901.134348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hubbell WL, Altenbach C, Hubbell CM, Khorana HG. Rhodopsin structure, dynamics, and activation: a perspective from crystallography, site-directed spin labeling, sulfhydryl reactivity, and disulfide cross-linking. Adv. Prot. Chem. 2003;63:243–290. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(03)63010-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Botelho AV, Gibson NJ, Wang Y, Thurmond RL, Brown MF. Conformational energetics of rhodopsin modulated by nonlamellar forming lipids. Biochemistry. 2002;41:6354–6368. doi: 10.1021/bi011995g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fishkin N, Berova N, Nakanishi K. Primary events in dim light vision: a chemical and spectroscopic approach toward understanding protein/chromophore interactions in rhodopsin. The Chemical Record. 2004;4:120–135. doi: 10.1002/tcr.20000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kukura P, McCamant DW, Yoon S, Wandschneider DB, Mathies RA. Structural observation of the primary isomerization in vision with femtosecond-stimulated Raman. Science. 2005;310:1006–1009. doi: 10.1126/science.1118379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Palczewski K. G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006;75:743–767. doi: 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Botelho AV, Huber T, Sakmar TP, Brown MF. Curvature and hydrophobic forces drive oligomerization and modulate activity of rhodopsin in membranes. Biophys. J. 2006;91:4464–4477. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.106.082776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Crocker E, Eilers M, Ahuja S, Hornak V, Hirshfeld A, Sheves M, et al. Location of Trp265 in metarhodopsin II: implications for the activation mechanism of the visual receptor rhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol. 2006;357:163–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.12.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Han M, Lou JH, Nakanishi K, Sakmar TP, Smith SO. Partial agonist activity of 11-cis-retinal in rhodopsin mutants. J. Biol. Chem. 1997;272:23081–23085. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.37.23081. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang Q, Schoenlein RW, Peteanu LA, Mathies RA, Shank CV. Vibrationally coherent photochemistry in the femtosecond primary event of vision. Science. 1994;266:422–424. doi: 10.1126/science.7939680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jäger S, Lewis JW, Zvyaga TA, Szundi I, Sakmar TP, Kliger DS. Chromophore structural changes in rhodopsin from nanoseconds to microseconds following pigment photolysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997;94:8557–8562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.16.8557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Borhan B, Souto ML, Imai H, Shichida Y, Nakanishi K. Movement of retinal along the visual transduction path. Science. 2000;288:2209–2212. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5474.2209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Vogel R, Fan G-B, Sheves M, Siebert F. The molecular origin of the inhibition of transducin activation in rhodopsin lacking the 9-methyl group of the retinal chromophore: a UV-Vis and FTIR spectroscopic study. Biochemistry. 2000;39:8895–8908. doi: 10.1021/bi000852b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vogel R, Siebert F, Lüdeke S, Hirshfeld A, Sheves M. Agonists and partial agonists of rhodopsin: retinals with ring modifications. Biochemistry. 2005;44:11684–11699. doi: 10.1021/bi0508587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vogel R, Lüdeke S, Siebert F, Sakmar TP, Hirshfeld A, Sheves M. Agonists and partial agonists of rhodopsin: retinal polyene methylation affects receptor activation. Biochemistry. 2006;45:1640–1652. doi: 10.1021/bi052196r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Han M, Groesbeek M, Sakmar TP, Smith SO. The C9 methyl group of retinal interacts with glycine-121 in rhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1997;94:13442–13447. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Bartl FJ, Fritze O, Ritter E, Herrmann R, Kuksa V, Palczewski K, et al. Partial agonism in a G protein-coupled receptor. Role of the retinal ring structure in rhodopsin activation. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:34259–34267. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M505260200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Domínguez M, Álvarez R, Pérez M, Palczewski K, de Lera AR. The role of the 11-cis-retinal ring methyl substituents in visual pigment formation. ChemBioChem. 2006;7:1815–1825. doi: 10.1002/cbic.200600207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Spooner PJR, Sharples JM, Verhoeven MA, Lugtenberg J, Glaubitz C, Watts A. Relative orientation between the β-ionone ring and the polyene chain for the chromophore of rhodopsin in native membranes. Biochemistry. 2002;41:7549–7555. doi: 10.1021/bi020007o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gröbner G, Burnett IJ, Glaubitz C, Choi G, Mason AJ, Watts A. Observations of light-induced structural changes of retinal within rhodopsin. Nature (London) 2000;405:810–813. doi: 10.1038/35015604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Salgado GFJ, Struts AV, Tanaka K, Fujioka N, Nakanishi K, Brown MF. Deuterium NMR structure of retinal in the ground state of rhodopsin. Biochemistry. 2004;43:12819–12828. doi: 10.1021/bi0491191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gascon JA, Batista VS. QM/MM study of energy storage and molecular rearrangments due to the primary event in vision. Biophys. J. 2004;87:2931–2941. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.104.048264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Röhrig UF, Guidoni L, Laio A, Frank I, Rothlisberger U. A molecular spring for vision. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004;126:15328–15329. doi: 10.1021/ja048265r. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Huber T, Botelho AV, Beyer K, Brown MF. Membrane model for the GPCR prototype rhodopsin: hydrophobic interface and dynamical structure. Biophys. J. 2004;86:2078–2100. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(04)74268-X. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lau P-W, Pitman MC, Feller SE, Brown MF. Conformational sensitivity of retinylidene cofactor in rhodopsin studied by molecular dynamics. Biophys. J. 2005;90:442a. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sugihara M, Hufen J, Buss V. Origin and consequences of steric strain in the rhodopsin binding pocket. Biochemistry. 2006;45:801–810. doi: 10.1021/bi0515624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Terstegen F, Buss V. Ab initio study of the C6–C7 conformation of retinal model systems. Chem. Lett. 1996;25:449–450. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fujimoto Y, Ishihara J, Maki S, Fujioka N, Wang T, Furuta T, et al. On the bioactive conformation of the rhodopsin chromophore: absolute sense of twist around the 6-s-cis bond. Chem. Eur. J. 2001;7:4198–4204. doi: 10.1002/1521-3765(20011001)7:19<4198::aid-chem4198>3.0.co;2-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Fujimoto Y, Fishkin N, Pescitelli G, Decatur J, Berova N, Nakanishi K. Solution and biologically relevant conformations of enantiomeric 11-cis-locked cyclopropyl retinals. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:7294–7302. doi: 10.1021/ja020083e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Pan D, Ganim Z, Kim JE, Verhoeven MA, Lugtenburg J, Mathies RA. Time-resolved resonance Raman analysis of chromophore structural changes in the formation and decay of rhodopsin's BSI intermediate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:4857–4864. doi: 10.1021/ja012666e. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Nevzorov AA, Moltke S, Heyn MP, Brown MF. Solid-state NMR line shapes of uniaxially oriented immobile systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999;121:7636–7643. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Crozier PS, Stevens MJ, Forrest LR, Woolf TB. Molecular dynamics simulation of dark-adapted rhodopsin in an explicit membrane bilayer: coupling between local retinal and larger scale conformational change. J. Mol. Biol. 2003;333:493–514. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2003.08.045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jäger F, Jäger S, Krautle O, Friedman N, Sheves M, Hofmann KP, et al. Interactions of the β-ionone ring with the protein in the visual pigment rhodopsin control the activation mechanism. An FTIR and fluorescence study on artificial vertebrate rhodopsins. Biochemistry. 1994;33:7389–7397. doi: 10.1021/bi00189a045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Nakanishi K, Crouch R. Application of artificial pigments to structure determination and study of photoinduced transformations of retinal proteins. Isr. J. Chem. 1995;35:253–272. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Spooner PJR, Sharples JM, Goodall SC, Bovee-Geurts PHM, Verhoeven MA, Lugtenburg J, et al. The ring of the rhodopsin chromophore in a hydrophobic activation switch within the binding pocket. J. Mol. Biol. 2004;343:719–730. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.08.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Farrens DL, Altenbach C, Yang K, Hubbell WL, Khorana HG. Requirement of rigid-body motion of transmembrane helices for light activation of rhodopsin. Science. 1996;274:768–770. doi: 10.1126/science.274.5288.768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Patel AB, Crocker E, Eilers M, Hirshfeld A, Sheves M, Smith SO. Coupling of retinal isomerization to the activation of rhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:10048–10053. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0402848101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kim J-M, Altenbach C, Kono M, Oprian DD, Hubbell WL, Khorana HG. Structural origins of constitutive activation in rhodopsin: Role of the K296/E113 salt bridge. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:12508–12513. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0404519101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Harbison GS, Smith SO, Pardoen JA, Courtin JML, Lugtenburg J, Herzfeld J, et al. Solid-state 13C NMR detection of a perturbed 6-s-trans chromophore in bacteriorhodopsin. Biochemistry. 1985;24:6955–6962. doi: 10.1021/bi00345a031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Horiuchi S, Tokunaga F, Yoshizawa T. Circular dichroism of cattle rhodopsin and bathorhodopsin at liquid nitrogen temperatures. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1980;591:445–457. doi: 10.1016/0005-2728(80)90175-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Luecke H, Lanyi JK. Structural clues to the mechanism of ion pumping in bacteriorhodopsin. Adv. Prot. Chem. 2003;63:111–130. doi: 10.1016/s0065-3233(03)63005-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Vogeley L, Sineshchekov OA, Trivedi VD, Sasaki J, Spudich JL, Luecke H. Anabaena sensory rhodopsin: a photochromic color sensor at 2.0 Å. Science. 2004;306:1390–1393. doi: 10.1126/science.1103943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Smith SO, Palings I, Copié V, Raleigh DP, Courtin J, Pardoen JA, et al. Low-temperature solid-state 13C NMR studies of the retinal chromophore in rhodopsin. Biochemistry. 1987;26:1606–1611. doi: 10.1021/bi00380a018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Moltke S, Nevzorov AA, Sakai N, Wallat I, Job C, Nakanishi K, et al. Chromophore orientation in bacteriorhodopsin determined from the angular dependence of deuterium NMR spectra of oriented purple membranes. Biochemistry. 1998;37:11821–11835. doi: 10.1021/bi980676v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yoshizawa T, Shichida Y. Low-temperature circular dichroism of intermediates of rhodopsin. Meth. Enzymol. 1982;81:634–641. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(82)81087-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Yan ECY, Kazmi MA, Ganim Z, Hou J-M, Pan D, Chang BSW, et al. Retinal counterion switch in the photoactivation of the G protein-coupled receptor rhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2003;100:9262–9267. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1531970100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lüdeke S, Beck R, Yan ECY, Sakmar TP, Siebert F, Vogel R. The role of Glu181 in the photoactivation of rhodopsin. J. Mol. Biol. 2005;353:345–356. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Martínez-Mayorga K, Pitman MC, Grossfield A, Feller SE, Brown MF. Retinal counterion switch mechanism in vision evaluated by molecular simulations. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:16502–16503. doi: 10.1021/ja0671971. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Salgado GFJ, Struts AV, Tanaka K, Krane S, Nakanishi K, Brown MF. Solid-state 2H NMR structure of retinal in metarhodopsin I. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006;128:11067–11071. doi: 10.1021/ja058738+. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Fahmy K, Jäger F, Beck M, Zvyaga TA, Sakmar TP, Siebert F. Protonation states of membrane-embedded carboxylic acid groups in rhodopsin and metarhodopsin II: a Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy study of site-directed mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1993;90:10206–10210. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Singh D, Hudson BS, Middleton C, Birge RR. Conformation and orientation of the retinyl chromophore in rhodopsin: a critical evaluation of recent NMR data on the basis of theoretical calculations results in a minimum energy structure consistent with all experimental data. Biochemistry. 2001;40:4201–4204. doi: 10.1021/bi001911o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Creemers AFL, Kiihne S, Bovee-Geurts PHM, DeGrip WJ, Lugtenburg J, de Groot HJM. 1H and 13C MAS NMR evidence for pronounced ligand-protein interactions involving the ionone ring of the retinylidene chromophore in rhodopsin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2002;99:9101–9106. doi: 10.1073/pnas.112677599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Seol Y, Skinner GM, Visscher K. Elastic properties of a single-stranded charged homopolymeric ribonucleotide. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004;93 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.118102. 118102-1-118102-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Keller D, Swigon D, Bustamante C. Relating single-molecule measurements to thermodynamics. Biophys. J. 2003;84:733–738. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(03)74892-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Grossfield A, Feller SE, Pitman MC. A role for direct interactions in the modulation of rhodopsin by ω-3 polyunsaturated lipids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2006;103:4888–4893. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0508352103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.MacKerell AD, Jr, Bashford D, Bellott M, Dunbrack RL, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, et al. All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J. Phys. Chem. B. 1998;102:3586–3616. doi: 10.1021/jp973084f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Saam J, Tajkhorshid E, Hayashi S, Schulten K. Molecular dynamics investigation of primary photoinduced events in the activation of rhodopsin. Biophys. J. 2002;83:3097–3112. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75314-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Klauda JB, Brooks BR, MacKerell AD, Venable RM, Pastor RW. An ab initio study on the torsional surface of alkanes and its effect on molecular simulations of alkanes and a DPPC bilayer. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2005;109:5300–5311. doi: 10.1021/jp0468096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Pastor RW, Venable RM, Feller SE. Lipid bilayers, NMR relaxation, and computer simulations. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002;35:438–446. doi: 10.1021/ar0100529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Pitman MC, Suits F, MacKerell AD, Feller SE. Molecular-level organization of saturated and polyunsaturated fatty acids in a phosphatidylcholine bilayer containing cholesterol. Biochemistry. 2004;43:15318–15328. doi: 10.1021/bi048231w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, Swaminathan S, Karplus M. CHARMM: a program for macromolecular energy, mininization, and dynamics calculations. J. Comp. Chem. 1983;4:187–217. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Fitch BG, Germain RS, Mendell M, Pitera J, Pitman M, Rayshubskiy A, et al. Blue Matter, an application framework for molecular simulation on Blue Gene. J. Para. Distrib. Comp. 2003;63:759–773. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Tanizaki S, Feig M. A generalized Born formalism for heterogeneous dielectric environments: application to the implicit modeling of biological membranes. J. Chem. Phys. 2005;122 doi: 10.1063/1.1865992. 124706-1-124706-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tanizaki S, Feig M. Molecular dynamics simulations of large integral membrane proteins with an implicit membrane model. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2006:548–556. doi: 10.1021/jp054694f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Karplus M, Kushick JN. Method for estimating the configurational entropy of macromolecules. Macromolecules. 1981;14:325–332. [Google Scholar]