Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Jan 13;7:40669. doi: 10.1038/srep40669

Impact and Origin of Interface States in MOS Capacitor with Monolayer MoS2 and HfO2 High-k Dielectric

Pengkun Xia 1, Xuewei Feng 1, Rui Jie Ng 1, Shijie Wang 2, Dongzhi Chi 2, Cequn Li 3, Zhubing He 3, Xinke Liu 4, Kah-Wee Ang 1,a
PMCID: PMC5234002  PMID: 28084434

Abstract

Two-dimensional layered semiconductors such as molybdenum disulfide (MoS2) at the quantum limit are promising material for nanoelectronics and optoelectronics applications. Understanding the interface properties between the atomically thin MoS2 channel and gate dielectric is fundamentally important for enhancing the carrier transport properties. Here, we investigate the frequency dispersion mechanism in a metal-oxide-semiconductor capacitor (MOSCAP) with a monolayer MoS2 and an ultra-thin HfO2 high-k gate dielectric. We show that the existence of sulfur vacancies at the MoS2-HfO2 interface is responsible for the generation of interface states with a density (Dit) reaching ~7.03 × 1011 cm−2 eV−1. This is evidenced by a deficit S:Mo ratio of ~1.96 using X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis, which deviates from its ideal stoichiometric value. First-principles calculations within the density-functional theory framework further confirms the presence of trap states due to sulfur deficiency, which exist within the MoS2 bandgap. This corroborates to a voltage-dependent frequency dispersion of ~11.5% at weak accumulation which decreases monotonically to ~9.0% at strong accumulation as the Fermi level moves away from the mid-gap trap states. Further reduction in Dit could be achieved by thermally diffusing S atoms to the MoS2-HfO2 interface to annihilate the vacancies. This work provides an insight into the interface properties for enabling the development of MoS2 devices with carrier transport enhancement.

Two-dimensional (2D) MoS2 has attracted a lot of interests for electronics applications due to its excellent electrical properties, such as high mobility1, near-ideal subthreshold swing2 and high on/off current ratio3,4,5,6. Although experimental demonstration of transistor characteristics show a channel mobility as high as ∼1,000 cm2V−1s−1 at room temperature7, theoretical study has estimated an intrinsic mobility of ∼410 cm2 V−1s−1 based on first-principles calculation of electron-phonon interaction8. Furthermore, in high-k dielectric environment, the room-temperature mobility of monolayer MoS2 can be significantly improved due to the effective screening of Coulomb scattering. The increase in mobility using high-k dielectric was also observed in multilayer MoS2 devices, though not so significant as compared to monolayer MoS22,5. The high mobility achieved through the adoption of high-k dielectric in MoS2 field-effect transistor is comparable to that of thin-film silicon9, thus opening up a wealth of opportunities for its application in future electronics. Moreover, high-k dielectric can be scaled up to achieve low gate leakage without losing the electrostatic gate control. This is crucial for its implementation in advanced technology node in which the transistor geometry will be aggressively downsized.

To integrate 2D MoS2 into scalable manufacturing, large-scale synthesis method to grow high-quality MoS2 film with precise control of thickness is essential. Bottom-up methods such as chemical vapor deposition (CVD)10,11,12, thermal evaporation13, hydrothermal synthesis14, electrochemical lithiation processes15 and sulfurization of molybdenum oxides16 have been introduced for fabricating large-scale layered 2D MoS2 on insulating substrates. Recently, a magnetron sputtering method was reported to synthesize wafer-scale, high-uniformity and high-purity MoS2 thin film with good control of thickness using a one-step process17. The thickness can be well controlled by the deposition time, substrate temperature and sputtering power. Moreover, intrinsic p-type MoS2 can be obtained by this method, which complements the n-type conductivity for enabling integrated circuit application.

To-date, the experimentally attainable hole mobility and on/off ratio of SiO2-based MoS2 transistors fabricated using the magnetron sputtering method have been reported to be ~12.2 cm2 V−1 s−1 and ~103, respectively17. However, carrier transport study of the magnetron-sputtered MoS2 with an integrated high-k gate dielectric have not been reported so far. In particular, the electrical characteristics such as capacitance-voltage (C-V) frequency dispersion and its dependence on interface states density18 (Dit) which influence the carrier transport properties deserve a further investigation. Apart from the mobility and on/off ratio, high Dit could also degrade the performance of transistor in terms of response time, traps effect on current transient, subthreshold swing and low frequency noise19,20. For methods including mechanical exfoliation (ME), CVD and thermal evaporation, the atomic defects in MoS2 monolayer have been systematically investigated by J. Hong et al.21. The defect density can reach up to ~1013 cm−2 and the type of the atomic defects varies for different synthesis methods. For instance, sulfur vacancies are responsible for the defects in ME and CVD while antisite defects with molybdenum replacing sulfur dominate in thermal evaporation.

Here, the impact and origin of interface states at the monolayer MoS2 and HfO2 high-k gate dielectric interface is investigated. We find that the presence of sulfur vacancies is responsible for the generation of interface states that causes the frequency dispersion in the accumulation regime of the MoS2 MOSCAP, which exhibits a dependence on the applied gate voltage. The deficit S:Mo ratio is experimentally verified by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis. We further employ the first-principles calculations within the density functional theory framework to explain the physical origin of trap states that exist within the monolayer MoS2 bandgap.

Results and Discussion

Figure 1(a) shows the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the fabricated MoS2 MOSCAP. An n-type degenerately-doped silicon substrate is used as the back gate electrode and a 5 nm thick HfO2 is subsequently deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD) technique. The deposition rate of the HfO2 films is estimated at ~1 Å/cycle, utilizing the tetrakisethylmethylamino hafnium (TEMAH), and water precursors at a deposition temperature of 250 °C for a total of 40 cycles. For every cycle, the TEMAH precursor and the water precursors are pulsed at 0.015 seconds and 0.01 seconds respectively, followed by a waiting time of 10 seconds. During the deposition, nitrogen is utilised as the carrier gas, and is flowing at 20 sccm. Following that, a large-scale monolayer MoS2 nanosheet is deposited by magnetron sputtering approach17 onto the HfO2/Si substrate. The MoS2 films are grown at high temperature (>700 °C) using Mo metal target sputtered in an vaporized sulfur ambient. Sulfur is vaporized using heating tape wrapping around the sulfur container before leaking into the chamber. The base pressure of the chamber is 3 × 10−7 mbar. The Argon pressure is fixed at 6.0 × 10−4 mbar and the sputtering power is as low as 6 W. At such low power, the growth rate is extremely low so as to achieve monolayer growth. Finally, a 100 nm Ti is deposited by e-beam evaporation as the contact electrode. Figure 1(b) depicts the SEM image showing the metal contact edge to MoS2, which reveals a smooth metal/MoS2 interface after the lift-off process. The two representative Raman-active modes E12g and A1g with peak frequency of 381.2 cm−1 and 405.8 cm−1 confirm the formation of MoS2 layer22, as plotted in Fig. 1(c). The MoS2 uniformity is quantitatively verified by conducting Raman spectra measurement across a typical ~1 cm2 HfO2 substrate (i.e. top, centre and bottom spots). A schematic cross-section of the MoS2 MOSCAP device structure is shown in Fig. 1(d). The existence of sulfur vacancies at the MoS2-HfO2 interface are vividly shown, which is responsible for the generation of interface states.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Top view scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the MOS capacitor with a monolayer MoS2. The inset shows the optical image. (b) SEM image showing the metal contact edge to MoS2, which reveals a smooth metal/MoS2 interface after the lift-off process. (c) Raman spectra measurement of the monolayer MoS2 on HfO2 substrate. The two representative Raman characteristic bands E12g and A1g that correspond in-plane and out-of-plane vibration modes, respectively, are found to peak at a frequency of 381.2 cm−1 and 405.8 cm−1, thus confirming the formation of MoS2 layer. (d) Schematic diagram showing the device structure of the MoS2 MOSCAP. A monolayer MoS2 nano-sheet is deposited onto the HfO2/Si substrate by magnetron sputtering approach. Due to an incomplete growth, sulfur vacancies are observed at the MoS2-HfO2 interface, which leads to the generation of interface states.

To investigate the impact of interface states on frequency dispersion, capacitance-voltage (C-V) characteristics of the MOSCAPs are measured using Agilent B1505A analyzer. Figure 2 plots the C-V curves of the monolayer MoS2 MOSCAPs measured as a function of frequency from 1 kHz to 1 MHz. Due to the degenerate doping in the silicon substrate (n++ Si) which acts as the back gate electrode, a depletion layer is typically not expected. Hence, the depletion capacitance measured in our capacitors with a Ti/MoS2/HfO2/n++ Si configuration is originated from the MoS2 layer rather than the bottom degenerately doped silicon. A repeatability check using four different samples confirms the consistency of the C-V measurement results [Fig. 2(a–d)]. The stretch-out or bump seen in the depletion regime is attributed to the existence of interface traps. This is further supported by the presence of Gp/ω peak at low frequency (1 kHz), which unambiguously marks the activity of midgap traps that represents the losses due to the exchange of carriers with the interface traps. This agrees well with the correlation between conductance and interface traps, as described by Schroder D. K23. As can be seen in Fig. 3(a), the capacitance values are also dependent on the applied gate voltage and frequency. Notably, the measured capacitance at accumulation regime decreases monotonically with increasing frequency. This is an indication of the presence of interface states (Dit) that localized at the semiconductor/oxide interface, which accounts for the frequency dispersion at the accumulation regime. Figure 3(b) shows the voltage-dependent frequency dispersion defined by [C(1 kHz)/C(1 MHz) –1] × 100%24. In weak accumulation regime, a frequency dispersion of ~11.5% is measured which decreases monotonically to ~9.0% when operates in the strong accumulation regime. To understand the mechanism, we employ energy band diagrams to describe the effect of interface traps23 on the frequency dispersion that exhibits a dependence on the applied gate voltage. It is worthy to note that the electron-occupied trap states are indicated by the small horizontal heavy lines and unoccupied trap states are shown by the light lines. Neutral and positively charged traps are marked by “0” and “+”, respectively. Due to electron occupancy, the donor trap states below the Fermi level (EF) are electrically neutral. However, those donor traps with energies above EF (i.e. EF < E < Ei where Ei is intrinsic Fermi level) are unoccupied and hence positively charged. Conversely, trap states that reside above Ei are unoccupied acceptors which are electrically neutral. Therefore, the larger frequency dispersion of ~11.5% seen in the weak accumulation regime indicates that a more severe interface traps should present near the mid-gap of monolayer-MoS2 with energy levels between EF < E < Ei. Hence when operates in the strong accumulation regime where the Fermi level moves away from the mid-gap traps due to an increased gate voltage, a reduction in the frequency dispersion of ~9.0% is achieved. In contrary, for an Al2O3/InGaAs gate stack, the dispersive behavior in accumulation has been attributed to border traps which originate from the bonding defects that exist within the gate oxide25. However, for the monolayer MoS2/HfO2 gate stack, given the large density of states in MoS2 due to a heavier hole effective mass (~2.4mo)26, the border traps capacitance would be significantly masked by the density of states capacitance. As such, the observed accumulation dispersion in our MoS2 MOSCAPs is unlikely to be caused by the border traps effect.

Figure 2. Capacitance-Voltage (C-V) characteristics of the MOSCAP with monolayer MoS2 measured at a range of low and high frequencies from 1 kHz to 1 MHz.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a–d) A repeatability check using four different samples confirms the consistency of the C-V measurement results. (e) The depletion capacitance and conductance-voltage (Gp/ω-V) characteristics measured at a low frequency of 1 kHz. The stretch-out or bump seen in the C-V curve as a result of interface traps is evidenced by the Gp/ω peak which unambiguously marks the activity of midgap traps that represents the losses due to the exchange of carriers with the interface traps.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) The measured capacitance at accumulation regime decreases monotonically with increasing frequency. This is an indication of the presence of interface states (Dit) that localized at the semiconductor/oxide interface. (b) The voltage-dependent frequency dispersion in the accumulation regime as defined by [C(1 kHz)/C(1 MHz)–1] × 100%. A larger average frequency dispersion of ~11.5% seen in the weak accumulation regime indicates that a more severe interface traps are present near the mid-gap of monolayer-MoS2 with energy levels between EF < E < Ei. Hence when operates in the strong accumulation regime where the Fermi level moves away from the mid-gap traps due to an increased gate voltage, a reduction in the frequency dispersion of ~9.0% is obtained. (c) The small hysteresis (ΔV) of ~0.34 V measured in our device exemplifies the achievement of good interface between MoS2 on HfO2.

As interface trap is strongly correlated to the stretch-out of C-V curves in the depletion or weak inversion regime27, the Dit can be extracted by employing the high-low frequency (Castagné–Vapaille) method28 through the following equation

graphic file with name srep40669-m1.jpg

where CLF and CHF are the measured capacitance in the depletion or weak inversion regime at low (1 kHz) and high (1 MHz) frequency, respectively. Cox is the oxide capacitance or dielectric capacitance and q is the elementary charge. The calculated Dit near the flatband voltage is determined to be ~7.03 × 1011 cm−2 eV−1 at the monolayer MoS2-HfO2 interface. According to previous report29, for multilayer MoS2-SiO2 interface with mechanical exfoliated MoS2 in back-gate configuration, the Dit can be as low as 7.2 × 1010 cm−2 eV−1. However, for monolayer MoS2 prepared by CVD, the Dit at the MoS2-SiO2 interface of device with top-gate configuration can be as high as 1.6 × 1013 cm−2 eV−1 30. Recently, a transfer technique used to prepare large-area, single-crystal and few-layer MoS2 films was reported to produce multilayer MoS2-SiO2 interface with Dit of 2.1 × 1013 cm−2 eV−1 in back-gate configuration31. Theoretically, due to more severe fixed charges and interface states between MoS2 and high-k dielectrics, the Dit should be much higher than that at MoS2-SiO2 interface. Research shows that the Dit at multilayer MoS2-Al2O3 interface can reach up to 2.6 × 1011 cm−2 eV−1 and ~2 × 1012 cm−2 eV−1 for back-gate3 and top-gate5,30 configurations, respectively, in which MoS2 was prepared by mechanical exfoliation29,32. Mid-gap Dit of ~1 × 1012 cm−2 eV−1 was also reported for the CVD-grown monolayer-MoS2/AlOx/HfO2/Ti/Au top gate stack using capacitance and AC conductance methods33. However, very limited results on MoS2-HfO2 interface have been reported34. Here, due to a much better uniformity of the MoS2 film as compared to CVD grown MoS217, we expect the quality of the dielectric and thereby Dit in top-gate device with MoS2 channel should be comparable to that of high-k device with MoS2 prepared by mechanical exfoliation. The small hysteresis (ΔV) of ~0.34 V measured in our device further exemplifies the good interface between the magnetron-sputtered MoS2 on HfO2, as shown in Fig. 3(c).

To investigate the physical origin behind the generation of interface states, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements are performed to analyze the MoS2-HfO2 interface chemistry. The core level XPS spectra are collected using a monochromatic Al Kα X-ray source with the pass energy of the analyzer set to 10 eV for high resolution measurement. The deconvolution of the S 2p and Mo 3d spectra of the monolayer MoS2 on HfO2 substrate are shown in Fig. 4(a,b), respectively. The binding energies of all spectra are referenced to C1s which is set to 285 eV. The doublet Mo 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 orbitals are found to peak at 229.77 and 232.89 eV, respectively. Whereas the spin-orbital splitting for S 2p is well resolved into S 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 at 162.59 and 163.81 eV, respectively, which is in good agreement with the reported binding energy values. These XPS results confirm the formation of pure 2H-MoS2 crystal structure by magnetron sputtering approach. However, the extraction of S:Mo ratio shows a deficit value of ~1.96, which indicates sulfur deficiency at the interface. This is attributed to the generation of sulfur vacancies due to an incomplete growth of a monolayer MoS2. However, when the MoS2 growth proceeds to achieve multi-layer or bulk film, the high growth temperature35 could promote the diffusion of sulfur atoms to the MoS2-HfO2 interface to annihilate the S vacancies and reduce the interface states density. Similar method has been reported36 where back-gated field-effect transistors (FETs) were fabricated on two types of MoS2 flakes, i.e. as-exfoliated and sulfur-treated. It has been shown that by treating the exfoliated MoS2 with sulfur vapor at high temperature (435 °C) under vacuum ambient can cause the sulfur atoms to diffuse into MoS2. This has led to an improvement in the S:Mo atomic ratio from 1.89 (as-exfoliated) to ~1.96 after sulfur treatment. With a near ideal stoichiometric S:Mo ratio, the electrical properties such as threshold voltage, current on/off ratio and electron mobility are expected to be improved.

Figure 4. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements are performed to analyze the MoS2-HfO2 interface properties.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

The deconvolution of the (a) S 2p and (b) Mo 3d spectra of the monolayer MoS2 on HfO2 substrate, where the binding energies of all spectra are referenced to C1s that is set to 285 eV. The doublet Mo 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 orbitals are found to peak at 229.77 and 232.89 eV, respectively. Whereas the spin-orbital splitting for S 2p is well resolved into S 2p3/2 and 2p1/2 at 162.59 and 163.81 eV, respectively, which is in good agreement with the reported binding energy values. These XPS results confirm the formation of pure 2H-MoS2 crystal structure by magnetron sputtering approach. However, the extraction of S:Mo ratio shows a deficit value of ~1.96, which indicates sulfur deficiency at the interface.

To support our hypothesis, first-principles calculations within the density-functional theory (DFT) framework are performed using the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP)37,38,39. Projector augmented wave (PAW) method40,41,42, and Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) functional43,44 with generalized gradient approximation (GGA) are used. We chose cubic HfO2 (111) as the substrate due to its simple structure and hexagonal surface unit cell. To eliminate the strain effect, the MoS2-HfO2 is modeled with a non-pseudomorphic periodic unit cell obtained by superposition of (√3 × √3) R30°-HfO2 (111) and (2 × 2)-MoS2 monolayer structures. Further details about the calculation are described in the Methods section. Figure 5(a,b) show the perspective side view of the supercell of our model and the top view of unit cell where Vs indicates the location of S vacancy in the interfacial region for the calculation of the case with S vacancy, respectively. S atoms are represented by gold spheres; Mo atoms are represented by purple spheres; O atoms are represented by red spheres; while Hf atoms are represented by green spheres. It is noted that the most stable interfacial configuration is produced when three S atoms of the MoS2 monolayer are residing on top of three interfacial Hf atoms. This facilitates the formation of interfacial Hf-S bonds due to the more chemically active Hf atoms that are experimentally verified using XPS measurement, where the Hf 4d3/2 and S 2 s orbitals are found to peak at 224.4 and 226.4 eV, respectively [Fig. 4(b)]. Whereas in the case of MoS2-HfO2 interface with S vacancy, the marked S atom is removed. The top and side views of the real-space charge density of defect states below the Fermi level at Γ (0, 0, 0) are shown in Fig. 5(c), in which the charge density isosurfaces are taken to be 0.004 e/bohr3. Figure 5(d,e) show the band structures and the corresponding density of states (DOS) for the MoS2-HfO2 interface without and with S vacancy, respectively. The interface states are colored in red in the band structure and DOS, proving that the presence of S vacancy is responsible for the generation of trap states within the MoS2 bandgap. Based on first-principles study and considering all values of chemical potentials relevant to the growth of MoS2, the S vacancies (VS) are found to be the most abundant defects45. Such VS are also known to be deep acceptor traps that are usually located near midgap. This is consistent with the larger frequency dispersion observed at weak accumulation in our devices, which affirms that a more severe trap states should be present near the mid-gap of monolayer-MoS2. Hence when operates in the strong accumulation regime where the Fermi level moves away from the mid-gap traps due to an increased gate voltage, a reduction in the frequency dispersion is observed. These results further strengthen our findings that the frequency dispersion is corroborated to the interface states due to sulfur vacancies that exist at the MoS2-HfO2 interface.

Figure 5. The top and side views of the MoS2-HfO2 interface structures.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

(a) The perspective side view of the supercell of our model. (b) Top view of the unit cell. Vs indicates the location of S vacancy in the interfacial region for the calculation of the case with S vacancy. For MoS2-HfO2 interface with S vacancy, the marked S atom is removed. S atoms are represented by gold spheres; Mo atoms are represented by purple spheres; O atoms are represented by red spheres; Hf atoms are represented by green spheres. (c) Top and side views of real-space charge density of the defect state below the Fermi level at Γ (0, 0, 0). The charge density isosurfaces are taken to be 0.004 e/bohr3. (d) Band structure and its corresponding density of states (DOS) for the MoS2-HfO2 interface without S vacancy. Fermi levels are aligned at the origin of the energy scale. (e) Band structure and its corresponding DOS of MoS2-HfO2 interface with S vacancy. Fermi levels are aligned at the origin of the energy scale. The trap states are colored in red in the band structure and DOS, which exist within the MoS2 bandgap.

Conclusion

The origin of interface states and its impact on the C-V frequency dispersion of MOSCAP with monolayer MoS2 and HfO2 high-k dielectric is investigated for the first time. We show experimentally that the presence of sulfur vacancies at the MoS2-HfO2 interface is responsible for the generation of interface states, as evidenced by the deficit S:Mo ratio through XPS analysis. First-principles calculations further confirm the existence of trap states due to sulfur deficiency that exist within the MoS2 bandgap. This accounts for the frequency dispersion measured in the accumulation regime, which demonstrates a dependence on the applied gate voltage. Further improvement in Dit could be achieved by controlling the thermal diffusion of sulfur atoms and its successive passivation with the interface vacancies, leading to a pathway to improve the carrier transport properties of MoS2 devices.

Methods

Sample Preparation and Device Fabrication

An n-type degenerately doped silicon substrate is used as the back gate electrode. A 5 nm thick HfO2 is subsequently deposited by atomic layer deposition (ALD) process. During the growth of the HfO2, the Si substrate is also oxidized at the surface to form an interfacial oxide layer. Following that, monolayer MoS2 thin film is deposited by magnetron sputtering onto the HfO2/Si substrate. The substrate is pre-cleaned using H2SO4, acetone, and deionized (DI) water in an ultrasonic bath prior to loading into the deposition chamber and pre-heated at 700 °C before the growth17. The MoS2 films are grown at high temperature (>700 °C) using Mo metal target sputtered in vaporized sulfur ambient. Sulfur is vaporized using heating tape wrapping around the sulfur container before leaking into the chamber. The base pressure of the chamber is 3 × 10−7 mbar. The Argon pressure is fixed at 6.0 × 10−4 mbar and the sputtering power is as low as 6 W. At this low power, the growth rate is extremely low so as to achieve mono- to few-layers growth. The layer number of the resulting MoS2 films can be controlled by tuning the sputtering power and deposition time. Finally, a 100 nm titanium (Ti) is deposited by e-beam evaporation and lifted off to form the metal electrodes.

Sample Characterization

Raman spectra are obtained on a single-gating micro-Raman spectrometer (Horiba-JY T64000) excited with 532 nm laser. The signal is collected through a 100 × objective lens, dispersed with a grating of 1800 g mm−1, and detected by a liquid nitrogen-cooled charge-coupled device. The samples are in-situ transferred to an XPS chamber for analysis. XPS measurements are performed in a VG ESCALAB 220i-XL system using a monochromatic Al Kα source. The pass energy of the analyzer is set to 10 eV for high measurement resolution. After that, a layer of photoresist is coated, UV-exposed under a mask and developed out a series of 61 μm × 37 μm rectangular windows.

Density Functional Theory (DFT) Calculation

DFT is performed using the Vienna Ab-initio Simulation Package (VASP)37,38,39. Projector augmented wave (PAW) method40,41,42, and Perdew, Burke, and Ernzerhof (PBE) functional43,44 with generalized gradient approximation (GGA) are used. We chose cubic HfO2 (111) as the substrate because of its simple structure and hexagonal surface unit cell. In order to eliminate the strain, the MoS2-HfO2 is modeled with a non-pseudomorphic periodic unit cell obtained by superposition of (√3 × √3) R30°-HfO2 (111) and (2 × 2)-MoS2 monolayer structures. The substrate contained three O-Hf-O trilayers wherein the top two trilayers are left free to move while the bottom trilayer is frozen at their equilibrium bulk positions to mimic bulk properties, which gave the converged results. The energy cutoff is 450 eV, and the successive slabs are separated by a vacuum layer of about 17 Å. Each atom is relaxed until the residual force acting on each atom is less than 0.02 eV/Å. The (4 × 4 × 1) and (8 × 8 × 1) k-point samplings are used for structural relaxations and electronic properties.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Xia, P. et al. Impact and Origin of Interface States in MOS Capacitor with Monolayer MoS2 and HfO2 High-k Dielectric. Sci. Rep. 7, 40669; doi: 10.1038/srep40669 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgments

This research is supported by the National University of Singapore Faculty Research Committee Grants (R-263-000-B21-133 and R-263-000-B21-731), and A*STAR Science and Engineering Research Council Grant (No. 152-70-00013).

Footnotes

Author Contributions K.-W. A. conceived and supervised the project. P. Xia performed the device fabrication and characterization. S.-J. Wang performed the MoS2 growth. X. Feng and R. J. Ng conducted the XPS analysis. C. Li and Z. He performed the first-principles calculations under the density functional theory framework. All authors analyzed the results and wrote the manuscript together.

References

  1. Das S., Chen H.-Y., Penumatcha A. V. & Appenzeller J. High Performance Multilayer MoS2 Transistors with Scandium Contacts. Nano Letters 13, 100–105 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kim S. et al. High-mobility and low-power thin-film transistors based on multilayer MoS2 crystals. Nat. Commun. 3, 1011 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wu W. et al. High mobility and high on/off ratio field-effect transistors based on chemical vapor deposited single-crystal MoS2 grains. Applied Physics Letters 102, 142106 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhou C. et al. Low voltage and high ON/OFF ratio field-effect transistors based on CVD MoS2 and ultra high-k gate dielectric PZT. Nanoscale 7, 8695–8700 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Liu H. & Ye P. D. Dual-Gate MOSFET With Atomic-Layer-Deposited as Top-Gate Dielectric. IEEE Electron Device Letters 33, 546–548 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  6. Jena D. & Konar A. Enhancement of carrier mobility in semiconductor nanostructures by dielectric engineering. Physical Review Letters 98, 136805 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kim W.-H. & Son J. Y. Single-Layer MoS2 Field Effect Transistor with Epitaxially Grown SrTiO3 Gate Dielectric on Nb-doped SrTiO3 Substrate. Bulletin of the Korean Chemical Society 34, 2563–2564 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  8. Kaasbjerg K., Thygesen K. S. & Jacobsen K. W. Phonon-limited mobility in n-type single-layer MoS2 from first principle. Phy. Rev. B 85, 115317 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  9. Gomez L. & Hoyt J. Electron transport in strained-silicon directly on insulator ultrathin-body n-MOSFETs with body thickness ranging from 2 to 25 nm. IEEE Electron Device Letters 28, 285–287 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  10. Lee Y.-H. et al. Synthesis of Large-Area MoS2 Atomic Layers with Chemical Vapor Deposition. Advanced Materials 24, 2320–2325 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Liu K.-K. et al. Growth of Large-Area and Highly Crystalline MoS2 Thin Layers on Insulating Substrates. Nano Letters 12, 1538–1544 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhan Y., Liu Z., Najmaei S., Ajayan P. M. & Lou J. Large-Area Vapor-Phase Growth and Characterization of MoS2 Atomic Layers on a SiO2 Substrate. Small 8, 966–971 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Feng Q. et al. Growth of Large‐Area 2D MoS2(1−x)Se2x Semiconductor Alloys. Advanced Materials 26, 2648–2653 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Peng Y. et al. Hydrothermal Synthesis and Characterization of Single-Molecular-Layer MoS2 and MoSe2. Chemistry Letters 30, 772–773 (2001). [Google Scholar]
  15. Eda G. et al. Photoluminescence from chemically exfoliated MoS2. Nano Letters 11, 5111–5116 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lin Y.-C. et al. Wafer-scale MoS2 thin layers prepared by MoO3 sulfurization. Nanoscale 4, 6637–6641 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tao J. et al. Growth of wafer-scale MoS2 monolayer by magnetron sputtering. Nanoscale 7, 2497–2503 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Qiu H. et al. Hopping transport through defect-induced localized states in molybdenum disulphide. Nat. Commun. 4, 2642 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Choi S. et al. Frequency-dependent CV Characteristic-based Extraction of Interface Trap Density in Normally-off Gate-recessed AlGaN/GaN Heterojunction Field-effect Transistors. J. Semicond. Tech. Sci. 15, 497–503 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  20. Bae J.-H. et al. In International Electron Devices Meeting, San Francisco, CA, IEEE; doi: 10.1109/IEDM.2012.6479034 (2012). [DOI]
  21. Hong J. et al. Exploring atomic defects in molybdenum disulphide monolayers. Nature Communications 6, 6293 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Li H. et al. From bulk to monolayer MoS2: evolution of Raman scattering. Advanced Functional Materials 22, 1385–1390 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  23. Schroder D. K. Semiconductor material and device characterization. 342–347 (John Wiley & Sons, 2006). [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhang M. H. et al. Characteristics of sputtered Hf1−xSixO2/Si/GaAs gate stacks. Applied Physics Letters 89, 042902 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  25. Kim E. J., Wang L., Asbeck P. M., Saraswat K. C. & McIntyre P. C. Border traps in Al2O3/In0.53Ga0.47As (100) gate stacks and their passivation by hydrogen anneals. Applied Physics Letters 96, 012906 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  26. Jin W. et al. Direct Measurement of the Thickness-Dependent Electronic Band Structure of MoS2 Using Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 106801 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Nicollian E. H. & Brews J. R. M. O. S. (Metal Oxide Semiconductor) Physics and Technology. 71 (John Wiley & Sons, 1982). [Google Scholar]
  28. Castagne R. & Vapaille A. Description of the SiO2-Si interface properties by means of very low frequency MOS capacitance measurements. Surface Science 28, 157–193 (1971). [Google Scholar]
  29. Na J. et al. Low-frequency noise in multilayer MoS2 field-effect transistors: the effect of high-k passivation. Nanoscale 6, 433–441 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Liu H. et al. Statistical Study of Deep Submicron Dual-Gated Field-Effect Transistors on Monolayer Chemical Vapor Deposition Molybdenum Disulfide Films. Nano Letters 13, 2640–2646 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Lee C. H. et al. Transferred large area single crystal MoS2 field effect transistors. Applied Physics Letters 107, 193503 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  32. Li T., Wan B., Du G., Zhang B. & Zeng Z. Electrical performance of multilayer MoS2 transistors on high-κ Al2O3 coated Si substrates. AIP Advances 5, 057102 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  33. Zhu W. et al. Electronic transport and device prospects of monolayer molybdenum disulphide grown by chemical vapour deposition. Nature Communications 5, 3087 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Najam F., Tan M. L. P., Ismail R. & Yu Y. S. Two-dimensional (2D) transition metal dichalcogenide semiconductor field-effect transistors: the interface trap density extraction and compact model. Semicond. Sci. Tech. 30, 075010 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang Y.-N., Law M. & Wu R. Atomistic Modeling of Sulfur Vacancy Diffusion Near Iron Pyrite Surfaces. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 119, 24859–24864 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  36. Leong W. S. et al. Tuning the threshold voltage of MoS2 field-effect transistors via surface treatment. Nanoscale 7, 10823–10831 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kresse G. & Hafner J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Physical Review B 47, 558 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kresse G. & Hafner J. Ab initio molecular dynamics for open-shell transition metals. Physical Review B 48, 13115 (1993). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kresse G. & Hafner J. Ab initio molecular-dynamics simulation of the liquid-metal–amorphous-semiconductor transition in germanium. Physical Review B 49, 14251 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kresse G. & Joubert D. From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Physical Review B 59, 1758 (1999). [Google Scholar]
  41. Blöchl P. E. Projector augmented-wave method. Physical Review B 50, 17953 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Hafner J. Ab‐initio simulations of materials using VASP: Density‐functional theory and beyond. Journal of Computational Chemistry 29, 2044–2078 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Perdew J. P., Burke K. & Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters 77, 3865 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Perdew J. P., Burke K. & Ernzerhof M. Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Physical Review Letters 78, 1396 (1996). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Komsa H.-P. & Krasheninnikov A. V. Native defects in bulk and monolayer MoS2 from first principles. Phy. Rev. B 91, 125304 (2015). [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES