Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Parasitology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Parasitology
. 2016 Apr-Jun;11(2):213–220.

Helminth Infections of Meriones persicus (Persian Jird), Mus musculus (House Mice) and Cricetulus migratorius (Grey Hamster): A Cross-Sectional Study in Meshkin-Shahr District, Northwest Iran

Zabiholah ZAREI 1, Mehdi MOHEBALI 1,2, Zahra HEIDARI 1, Jaber DAVOODI 3, Afshin SHABESTARI 3, Afsaneh MOTEVALLI HAGHI 1, Khadijeh KHANALIHA 1, Eshrat Beigom KIA 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC5236098  PMID: 28096855

Abstract

Background:

Rodents have important role as reservoirs of different parasites. The aim of this study was to determine helminth parasites of abundant rodents in Meshkin-Shahr, Ardabil Province northwest Iran.

Methods:

From April 2014 to March 2015; 205 rodents including 118 Meriones persicus, 63 Mus musculus and 24 Cricetulus migratorius were collected, using live traps. All rodents were dissected and their different tissues examined for infectivity with helminth parasites.

Results:

Overall, 74.2% of rodents were infected with helminth parasites. The rate of infectivity in M. persicus, M. musculus and C. migratorius was 82.2%, 61.9%, 66.7%, respectively. In general, among all 205 rodents, the species and infection rates of helminthes were as follows: Nematoda: Trichuris sp. (46.8%), Capillaria hepatica (18.1%), Syphacia frederici (14.2%), Aspicularis tetraptera (3.4%), Trichuris rhombomidis (2%), Heligmosomom sp. (2%), Streptopharagus kuntzi (0.5%), Spiruridae gen. sp. (0.5%); Cestoda: Hymenolepis nana fraterna (16.6%) Hymenolepis diminuta (7.3%) tetratiridium of Mesocestoides sp. (1%), Paranoplocephala sp. (0.5%), Cysticercus fasciolaris (0.5%), Taenia endothoracicus larva (0.5%), and Acanthocephala: Moniliformis moniliformis (18.5%).

Conclusions:

Variable species of helminthes circulate in the rodents of the study area. Presence of several zoonotic species highlights the potential risk of infections for public health.

Keywords: Helminth parasites, Iran, Rodents, Zoonose

Introduction

Rodents are one of the most diverse mammalian animals constituting wide range of genus and species. They have widespread distribution in the world and have important roles as agricultural pests and spread of infectious diseases. There are many parasites in rodents, which can be transmitted to human and domestic animals (1).

Investigation on the role of rodents as reservoirs of parasitic agents is a subject of interest for parasitologists. Studies on helminthes of rodents in different parts of the world indicate the high variety of species occurring in such mammals. However, the parasitic fauna may be variable in different geographical areas. In a study on 315 small mammals (insectivores and rodents) in the Serra Caldrona Mountains (Valencian Community, Spain) 38 helminth species (4 trematodes, 10 cestodes and 24 nematodes) were detected, reflecting a relatively very rich qualitative diversity in that study area (2). In a checklist of epidemiology of nematode parasites of genus Apodemus (Murina: Rodentia) throughout the world excluding Japan, 176 published data of the parasite-host distribution were derived and a wide range of species were listed (3). Coincidently, in Iran, the importance of rodent borne parasites has also been reported in relevant studies (48).

Leishmania species were isolated from rodents of various parts of Iran and characterized by isoenzyme and molecular analysis (9). Accordingly, rodents harbor Leishmania spp. and may have a role in transmission of leishmaniasis to humans. Additionally, Leishmania donovani was isolated from Meriones persicus (Persion jird) captured in Meshkin-Shahr, Ardabil Province, northwest Iran (9). In Germi, the adjacent city of Meshkin-Shahr in Mogan Plain, M. persicus was infected with 13 different species of helminth parasites (5). During a preliminary study on parasites of rodents in Meshkin-Shahr, this rodent was introduced as a prevalent species and infected with some helminthes (10).

Due to medical importance of this issue and lack of adequate information, the current study was undertaken in Meshkin-Shahr to identify variety of helminth infections and to determine their potential zoonotic importance in M. persicus and two more abundant rodents in this area, including Mus musculus (house mouse) and Cricetulus migratorius (grey hamster).

Material and Methods

Study area

Rodents were collected from Meshkin-Shahr County (38° 23′ N and 47° 40′ E) in the central part of Ardabil Province, northwest Iran (Fig.1).

Fig. 1:

Fig. 1:

Map of the study area; Left: Map of Iran, Right: Location of Meshkin-Shahr in Ardabil Province, Iran

It is the nearest city to one of the highest and famous mountains of Iran named Sabalan. Meshkin-Shahr enjoys a mountainous area with moderate climate. The capital city is Meshkin-Shahr at 839 kilometers from Tehran, with the population of 63655 by the 2006 census (11).

Sampling

In this cross-sectional study, samplings of rodents were carried out from April 2014 to March 2015. The Ethics Committee of the Tehran University of Medical Sciences (TUMS) approved the study.

First, different sites including deserts, valleys, hills and rough pastures were searched for finding alive rodents or any sign of their active colonies such as newly turned soil, droppings, tracks and storage of food in nests. Then, Havahart and Sherman live traps were set at early evening until next day sunrise, with every hour interval inspection and removal of entrapped rodents to avoid death of the rodents or interfere of humans or animals, especially foxes. For house mouse and hamsters, traps were set in indoor places such as homes and around parks, and outdoor sites of human residential places in rural areas including agricultural farms and near dry riverbeds. For attraction of rodents, local mini aromatic cucumber, cheese and walnut were used to bait the traps.

Dissection and tissue examination

All the trapped rodents were transferred to the Meshkin-Shahr Health Research Center where they were anesthetized with chloroform and after blood taking, thin and thick smears were prepared for further Giemsa staining and microscopic examinations for microfilaria. Gender and the results of physical examination of rodents were registered for species identification, using valid references (12). All the rodents were transferred to the Helminthological Laboratory of School of Public Health (SPH), TUMS, Tehran, Iran. There, every rodent was carefully dissected and different organs including liver, diaphragm, urinary bladder; muscles, esophagus, stomach, small intestine; large intestine and cecum were separately placed in petri dishes to be examined for helminthes. Some smears of livers were prepared for each rodent and examined microscopically for detection of Capillaria hepatica eggs. Peritoneal cavity and skin were also searched macroscopically. Some parts of intestinal contents were preserved in 10% formal-dehyde solution to detect parasites ova, using formalin-ether concentration technique.

Helminthic detection and identification

Every tissue in separate Petri dish was examined under stereomicroscope and in case of observation of helminth larva or adult; they were removed by fine blunt needle and after washing in lukewarm saline, gradually transferred to 70° ethanol. Nematodes and Acanthocephalas were cleared in lactophenol solution or temporary stained by azocarmine. Respect to the cestode parasites, they placed between two pieces of glasses, prior to immersion in 70° ethanol. Morphological descriptions were carried out after staining in carmine alum, dehydrating in graded ethanol and xylene, and mounting in canada balsam mounting medium. Characteristics features of every helminth (1315) were measured by a calibrated microscope. Using valid systematic keys of helminthes identifications were fulfilled at the level of species, as far as possible. In case of presence of only female Trichuris, it was registered as Trichuris sp.

Data analysis was performed using SPSS software version 16 (Chicago, IL, USA). P-values of less than 0.05 considered as significant difference.

Results

Overall, 205 rodents were collected of which 118 (57.6%), 63 (30.7%) and 24 (11.7%) samples were M. persicus (male = 69, female = 49), M. musculus (male = 41, female = 22) and C. migratorius (male = 16, female = 8), respectively.

Table 1 illustrates the 15 helminth species identified among all 205 rodents. Accordingly, 74.2% of the rodents were infected with 8 species of nematodes, 6 cestodes and one Acanthocephala. Some of these parasites are considered as zoonoses. The most prevalent helminth was Trichuris sp. (46.8%). No trematode was found in any rodent.

Table 1:

Helminth parasites in 205 rodents from Meshkin-Shahr, Ardabil Province, Iran

Nematodes No. % Cestodes No. %
Trichuris sp. 96 46.8 Hymenolepis nana fraterna* 34 16.6
Capillaria hepatica* 37 18.1 Hymenolepis diminuta* 15 7.3
Syphacia frederici 29 14.2 Tetrathyridium* 2 1
Aspicularis tetraptera* 7 3.4 Paranoplocephala sp. 1 0.5
Trichuris rhombomidis 4 2 Cysticercus fasciolaris * 1 0.5
Heligmosomum sp . 4 2 Taenia endothoracicus larva 1 0.5
Streptopharagus kuntzi 1 0.5 Acanthocephala
Spiruridae gen. sp. 1 0.5 Moniliformis moniliformis* 38 18.5
*

Potentially zoonotic species

The helminthes of each rodent species separately are presented in Tables 24. In M. persicus 82.2% were infected with 9 different helminth species and the most prevalent one was Trichuris sp. (61.9%) (Table 2). In M. musculus, 13 species of helminthes were detected, giving 39% infectivity rate; among those Syphacia frederici (22%) was the most prevalent species (Table 3).

Table 2:

Frequency and prevalence of helminthes in Meriones persicus according to sex of rodents and infected organs

Organ Helminth species Rodent sex Total
Male (No.= 69) Female (No.= 49) (No.= 118)
No. % No. % No. %
Small intestine Moniliformis moniliformis 18 26.1 14 28.6 32 27.1
Hymenolepis nana fraterna 9 13 16 32.7 25 21.2
Hymenolepis diminuta 9 13 5 10.2 14 11.9
Large intestine and cecum Trichuris sp. 44 63.8 29 59.2 73 61.9
Trichuris rhombomidis 0 0 1 2 1 0.9
Syphacia frederici 2 2.9 1 2 3 2.5
Liver Capillaria hepatica 18 26.1 13 26.5 31 26.3
Omentum Taenia endothoracicus larva 1 1.5 0 0 1 0.9
Abdominal cavity Tetrathyridium 0 0 1 2 1 0.9
* Total infection 55 79.7 42 85.7 97 82.2
*

In some cases co-infection with two or more parasites were found.

Table 4:

Frequency and prevalence of helminthes in Cricetulus migratorius in Meshkin-Shahr according to the sex of the rodents and infected organs

Organ Helminth species Rodent sex Total
Male (No.= 16) Female (No.= 8) (No. = 24)
No. % No. % No. %
Small intestine Hymenolepis nana fraterna 0 0 2 25 2 8.3
Heligmosomum sp. 3 18.8 0 0 3 12.5
Large intestine and cecum Trichuris sp. 6 37.5 3 37.5 9 37.5
Trichuris rhombomidis 1 6.3 1 12.5 2 8.3
Syphacia frederici 3 18.8 1 12.5 4 16.7
Liver Capillaria hepatica 2 12.5 3 37.5 5 20.8
Abdominal cavity Tetrathyridium 1 6.3 0 0 1 4.2
* Total Infection 9 56.3 7 87.5 16 66.7
*

In some cases co-infection with two or more parasites were found.

Table 3:

Frequency and prevalence of helminthes in Mus musculus according to sex of rodents and infected organs

Organ Helminth species Gender Total
Male (No.= 41) Female (No.= 22) (No.: = 63)
No. % No. % No. %
Small intestine Moniliformis moniliformis 3 7.3 3 13.6 6 9.5
Streptopharagus kuntzi 0 0 1 4.5 1 1.6
Hymenolepis nana fraterna 3 7.3 4 18.2 7 11.1
Hymenolepis diminuta 0 0 1 4.5 1 1.6
Heligmosomum sp. 0 0 1 4.5 1 1.6
Paranoplocepbala sp. 0 0 1 4.5 1 1.6
Large intestine and cecum Trichuris sp. 9 22 5 22.7 14 22.2
Trichuris rombomidis 1 2.4 0 0 1 1.6
Syphacia frederici 10 24.4 12 54.5 22 34.9
Aspicularis tetraptera 2 4.9 5 22.7 7 11.1
Capillaria hepaiica 0 0 1 4.5 1 1.6
Liver Cysticercus fasciolaris 0 0 1 4.5 1 1.6
Stomach Spiruridae gen. sp. 0 0 1 4.5 1 1.6
* Total Infection 21 51.2 18 81.8 39 61.9
*

In some cases co-infection with two or more parasites were found.

As indicated in Table 4, 16 C. migratorius (66.7%) were infected with 7 helminthes and Trichuris sp. (37.5%) constituted the most prevalent one. Statistical analysis among infectivity with different helminthes and rodent species indicated that Trichuris sp. (P = 0.00), Capillaria hepatica (P = 0.00) and Moniliformis moniliformis (P = 0.004) were more prevalent in M. persicus; while S. frederici (P = 0.00) and Aspicularis tetraptera (P = 0.001); and Heligmosomum sp. (P=0.002) were more prevalent in M. musculus, and C. migratorius, respectively.

In each rodent species, the relationships between rate of infectivity with every helminthes and sex of the host were analyzed. Accordingly, Hymenolepis nana fraterna in M. persicus and S. frederici in M. musculus were significantly more abundant in females than males (P = 0.002). However, for other helminthes no sex tendency was found.

Discussion

The dominant rodent species in this study was M. persicus comprising 57.6% of all captured rodents. This is concordant with the previous studies in rodents of Meshkin-Shahr (10) and Germy (5) in Ardabil Province that reporting M. persicus as the most prevalent rodent captured.

In the current study, 205 rodents including 118 M. persicus, 63 M. musculus and 24 C. migratorius were examined for helminth parasites. The overall rate of infectivity among these rodents was 74.2%, and for each species separately were 82.2%, 61.9% and 66.7%, respectively. Variety of helminthes comprised 15 different species including 8 nematodes, 6 cestodes and one Acanthocephalan. No trematode was found which is coincident with several other similar studies on rodents (47, 16).

Five species including Trichuris sp., C. hepatica, S. frederici, H. nana fraterna and T. rhombomidis were common among all three rodent species. Considering the public health concerns of these parasites, 7 species including C. hepatica, M. moniliformis, H. nana fraterna, H. diminuta, A. tetraptera, Mesocestoides sp. (tetrathyridium) and larva of Taenia taeniaeformis (cysticercus fasciolaris) are known zoonotic species (1).

The most prevalent parasite in this study was Trichuris sp. with the rate of 61.9%, 22.2% and 37.5% in M. persicus, M. musculus and C. migratorius, respectively. In a similar study in Germi, Ardabil Province, Iran Trichuris sp. constituted the first rank of helminth parasites in M. persicus (5). In addition, in Golestan Province, Iran Trichuris sp. was one of the prevalent helminthes in great gerbil Rhombomys opimus (7).

The second most prevalent parasite was M. moniliformis with the rate of 27.1% and 9.5% in M. persicus and M. musculus, respectively. This parasite was not found in C. migratorius in this study. Infectivity of M. persicus with this parasite has also been recorded from Germy County in Ardabil Province (5). There are reports of human cases of infectivity with this pathogen in Iran (reviewed in 17).

The third most prevalent parasite was C. hepatica with the rate of 26.3%, 1.9% and 20.8% in M. persicus, M. musculus and C. migratorius, respectively. This nematode has previously been reported from M. persicus in Germy, the adjacent city to Meshkin-Shahr in Ardabil Province, Iran (5), as well as in M. musculus, brown rat Rattus norvegicus and black rat Rattus rattus in Kermanshah, Iran (6). Capillaria hepatica is a zoonotic parasite with worldwide distribution and has high affinity to the liver of the hosts. However, no human report of hepatic capillariasis is documented in Iran, so far. This might be due to misdiagnosis, because diagnosis is by necropsy or biopsy, and eggs are not shed into the environment with the feces (18). The host specificity of this parasite is low and more than 180 mammalian species including human are known as suitable hosts (19). It has been found in more than 90 Muroidean rodent species in more than 60 countries through the world; and R. norvegicus seems to be the most important host species (18). The occurrence of C. hepatica in C. migratorius in the current study constitutes new host record in Iran.

Statistical analysis between infectivity with different helminthes and rodent species indicated that Trichuris sp (P = 0.00), M. moniliformis (P = 0.004), and C. hepatica (P = 0.00) were more prevalent in M. persicus. However, in M. musculus, S. frederici (P = 0.00) and A. tetraptera (P = 0.001) and in C. migratorius, Heligmosomum sp. (P = 0.002) were more prevalent. Coincidently, Trichuris sp, M. moniliformis, and C. hepatica constituted the most prevalent species of M. persicus in Germy County (5). This is more probably due to similarity of the host as well as geographical conditions. In a study in suburban areas of Hamadan City in western Iran, S. frederici was recorded as the most abundant species in wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus (8). Considering the host specificity of helminthes in the present study, H. nana fraterna was low host specific species, being common among all three rodent species, without significant difference in its infection rates.

For all helminthes, the relationships between rate of infectivity and sex of the rodents were analyzed. Apart from H. nana fraterna in M. persicus and S. frederici in M. musculus, which had tendency in females, no significant sex difference was found in infectivity with other helminth species. In similar studies on R. norvegicus (20) and on R. opimus (7) females were found statistically more infected with H. nana fraterna than males. While, in the latter study and in a study in Belgrade, Serbia (16) Trichuris muris showed tendency to male biased in R. opimus and R. norvegicus, respectively.

Conclusion

Parasites abundances and species richness are both considerable in the rodents of the study area. Trichuris sp., C. hepatica, S. frederici, H. nana and T. rhombomidis are the less host specific species. Trichuris sp. and C. hepatica are two dominant species. Host species was a significant influence on abundances of some helminthes. Circulating of zoonotic species in the rodents, especially M. moniliformis, C. hepatica, and H. nana fraterna which are the most prevalent ones, highlights the potential risk of their infections for public health and implies utilizations of efficient diagnostic measures in population of the study area, notably children.

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Deputy of Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences; Project No. 22943-27-02-92. The authors would like to appreciate all people contributed to perform this study, especially Dr. I. Mobedi, Dr. F. Zahabiun from the Department of Medical Parasitology and Mycology (SPH-TUMS). Thanks also to Mrs. Z. Faramarzy, Mrs. M. Tazehvared, Mr. A. Azarm, Mr. A. Tazehvared and Mr. S. Dasturi for their kind collaboration.

References

  • 1. Ashford R, Crewe W. The parasites of Homo sapiens : An annotated checklist of the protozoa, helminths, and arthropods for which we are home. CRC Press ; ; 2003 . . [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Fuentes M, Cerezuela A, Galán-Puchades M. A helminthological survey of small mammals (insectivores and rodents) in the Serra Calderona mountains (Valencian community, Spain). Res Rev Parasitol. 2000; 60: 23– 36. [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Asakawa M, Tenora F. A checklist of epidemiology of nematode parasites of the genus Apodemus (murinae: Rodentia) throughout the world excluding Japan. J. Rakuno Gakuen Univ. 1996; 20 (2): 181– 213. [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kia E, Homayouni M, Farahnak A, Mohebali M, Shojai S. Study of endoparasites of rodents and their zoonotic importance in Ahvaz, south west Iran. Iran J Public Health. 2001; 30: 49– 52. [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Kia E, Shahryary-Rad E, Mohebali M, Mahmoudi M, Mobedi I, Zahabiun F, Zarei Z, Miahipoor A, Mowlavi Gh, Akhavan AA, Vatandoost H. Endoparasites of Rodents and Their Zoonotic Importance in Germi, Dashte–Mogan, Ardabil Province, Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2010; 5 (4): 15– 20. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Pakdel N, Naem S, Rezaei F, Chalehchaleh AA. A survey on helminthic infection in mice (Mus musculus) and rats (Rattus norvegicus and Rattus rattus) in Kermanshah, Iran. Vet Res Forum. 2013; 4: 105– 9. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Kamranrashani B, Kia E, Mobedi I, Mohebali M, Zarei Z, Mowlavi G, Hajjaran H, Abai M, Sharifdini M, Kakooei Z. Helminth parasites of Rhombomys opimus from Golestan Province, northeast Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2013; 8 (1): 78– 84. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Yousefi A, Eslami A, Mobedi I, Rahbari S, Ronaghi H. Helminth infections of house mouse (Mus musuclus) and wood mouse (Apodemus sylvaticus) from the suburban areas of Hamadan City, western Iran. Iran J Parasitol. 2014; 9 (4): 511– 8. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Mohebali M, Javadian E, Yaghoobi Ershadi M, Akhavan A, Hajjaran H, Abaei M. Characterization of Leishmania infection in rodents from endemic areas of the Islamic Republic of Iran. East Mediterr Health J. 2004; 10 (4–5): 591– 9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Mohebali M, Rezaei H, Farahnak A, Kanani Nootash A. A survay on parasitic fauna (helminths and ectoparasites) of the rodents in Meshkinshahr district, north west Iran. J Fac Vet Med Univ Tehran. 1997; 52 (3): 23– 5. [Google Scholar]
  • 11. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meshginshahr .
  • 12. Etemad E. Mammals of Iran rodents and key to their identification. National society of natural source and human environment protection. Publication of Tehran ; ; 1978 . (in persian). [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Skrjabin KL. Essentials of cestodology, the academy of the USSR, Moscow. 1951 . .
  • 14. Yamaguti S. Systema Helminthum. 1 st ed: Vol. I–IV . New York IP-e : , 1958–1963 . [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Eslami A. Veterinary helminthology (nematoda, acanthocephala). Tehran University Publication ; ; 1997 . (In Persian). [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kataranovski D, Vukićević-Radić OD, Kataranovski MV, Radović DL, Mirkov II. Helminth fauna of Mus musculus linnaeus, 1758 from the suburban area of Belgrade, Serbia. Arch Biol Sci. 2008; 60: 609– 17. [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Saebi E. Clinical Parasitilogy. 3rd ed. Vol. 2 . Aeejh Press ; ; 2014 . (in persian). [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Fuehrer HP. An overview of the host spectrum and distribution of Calodium hepaticum (syn. Capillaria hepatica): Part 1-Muroidea. Parasitol Res. 2014; 113: 619– 40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Fuehrer HP. An overview of the host spectrum and distribution of Calodium hepaticum (syn. Capillaria hepatica): Part 2-mammalia (excluding Muroidea). Parasitol Res. 2014; 113: 641– 51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Kataranovski M, Mirkov I, Belij S, Popov A, Petrović Z, Gačić Z, Kataranovski D. Intestinal helminths infection of Rats (Rattus norvegicus) in the Belgrade Area (Serbia): The effect of sex, age and habitat. Parasite. 2011; 18 (2): 189– 96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Parasitology are provided here courtesy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences

RESOURCES