EDITORIAL
Rhizobia form an evolutionarily diverse group of plant symbiotic bacteria belonging to the Alpha- and Betaproteobacteria. These bacteria engage in symbiotic interaction with plants of the Leguminosae family and uniquely with the nonlegume genus Parasponia that culminates in bacterial nitrogen fixation to the benefit of the host (1). The root nodule symbiosis accounts for a large share of these interactions. In the course of this interaction, the newly induced plant organ is colonized by the bacteria, which penetrate the plant tissue through infection threads. These are plant-derived tubules filled with growing and dividing bacteria (2). During release from the infection threads, bacteria become enclosed in a plant-derived membrane and differentiate into so-called bacteroids. These are defined as endosymbiotic, morphologically distinct, nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Bacteroids provide combined nitrogen to the plant in exchange for nutrients. The first accurate morphological description of bacteroids dates back to Martinus Willem Beijerinck in his groundbreaking article describing root nodule bacteria of Vicia (3). He considered bacteroids to develop from bacteria that invade the roots, not as an autonomous formation of the protoplasm of the plant as believed by earlier researchers (3). Beijerinck suggested that during this metamorphic process bacteria gradually lose their ability to reproduce.
Debate over the viability and fate of bacteroids lasted over many decades. Early studies also provided divergent results regarding the DNA content of bacteroids (4–7). While some studies reported no differences in DNA content between free-living rhizobia and bacteroids, others reported an increase in DNA content in bacteroids. In a Journal of Bacteriology (JB) paper in 1977, Paau et al. (8) reported flow microfluorometry data unambiguously showing that bacteroids in the Sinorhizobium meliloti-Medicago sativa symbiosis have a higher DNA content than free-living cells. Diverse opinions on the fate and properties of bacteroids can be attributed mostly to the challenging experimental object and biological differences between specific rhizobium-legume interactions. After more than 125 years of further research, it is well known that root nodule symbiosis and bacteroid differentiation come in different flavors. Determinate or indeterminate nodule types are distinguished based on the transient or persistent character of host cell proliferation, respectively (9). Consequently, indeterminate nodules, continuously growing due to a persistent apical meristem, show a gradient of bacterial developmental stages along the nodule. In contrast, bacteria develop rather synchronously in determinate nodules. Terminally differentiated, enlarged, or even branched bacteroids are found mostly in indeterminate nodules, while bacteroids in determinate nodules remain small and are capable of resuming free-living growth (10). In both types of nodules, bacteroids show changes in gene expression and metabolic activity, while large changes in DNA content are found mainly during bacteroid differentiation in indeterminate nodules (10).
Advanced electron microscopic analyses have promoted a significantly better understanding of early infection steps, release of bacteria from infection threads, and bacteroid differentiation. From the 1960s to the 1980s, several JB papers made major contributions in this field (11–15). These studies revealed the full spectrum of bacteroid morphologies and types of symbiosome, which is defined as one or more bacteroids enclosed in a peribacteroid membrane. Depending on the host plant, symbiosomes containing either a single bacteriod, e.g., in M. sativa nodules (11, 14), or multiple bacteroids, e.g., in Glycine max and Vigna sinensis nodules (12, 13), were observed. Paau et al. (15) performed a systematic study of the ultrastructure of S. meliloti cells in the different developmental zones of an indeterminate M. sativa nodule. From their fine-grained analysis, the authors concluded that vegetative bacterial cells released from the senescent nodule originate from the reservoir of bacteria in infection threads. They took the view that in spite of bacteroid degeneration, release of infection thread bacteria from senescent nodules increases the bacterial population in the soil, supporting a truly symbiotic relationship.
Discovery of antimicrobial nodule-specific cysteine-rich (NCR) peptides in the inverted repeat-lacking clade (IRLC) of legumes and their role in imposing irreversible terminal differentiation onto bacteria has recently opened an exciting new chapter in root nodule symbiosis research (10, 16, 17). This points to an evolutionary trend toward plant dominance over symbionts in this clade of legumes (18) and the importance of a reservoir of bacteria in infection threads capable of resuming growth after release from senescent indeterminate nodules. It is commonly speculated that this reservoir of infection thread bacteria is particularly important in light of terminal bacteroid differentiation in indeterminate nodules. In contrast, nodules with a determinate meristem contain very few persistent infection threads. If all bacteria in a determinate nodule were driven to terminal differentiation by NCR peptides, very few bacteria would survive nodule senescence. This would likely constitute a considerable selective disadvantage for the legume partner and may provide an explanation why the two types of nodules are different with respect to imposing terminal differentiation on bacteroids.
The views expressed in this Editorial do not necessarily reflect the views of the journal or of ASM.
REFERENCES
- 1.Suzaki T, Yoro E, Kawaguchi M. 2015. Leguminous plants: inventors of root nodules to accommodate symbiotic bacteria. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 316:111–158. doi: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2015.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gage DJ. 2004. Infection and invasion of roots by symbiotic, nitrogen-fixing rhizobia during nodulation of temperate legumes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 68:280–300. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.68.2.280-300.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Beijerinck MW. 1888. Die Bacterien der Papilionaceenknöllchen. Bot Ztg 46:725–804. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Bergersen FJ. 1974. The bacterial component of soybean root nodules; changes in respiratory activity, cell dry weight and nucleic acid content with increasing nodule age. J Gen Microbiol 19:312–332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Dilworth MJ, Williams DC. 1967. Nucleic acid changes in bacteroids of Rhizobium lupini during nodule development. J Gen Microbiol 48:31–36. doi: 10.1099/00221287-48-1-31. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Reijnder L, Visser L, Aalber AMJ, Van Kammer A, Houvers A. 1974. A comparison of DNA from free-living and endosymbiotic Rhizobium leguminosarum (strain PRE). Biochim Biophys Acta 414:206–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sutton WD. 1974. Some features of the DNA of Rhizobium bacteroids and bacteria. Biochim Biophys Acta 366:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0005-2787(74)90312-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Paau AS, Lee D, Cowles JR. 1977. Comparison of nucleic acid content in populations of free-living and symbiotic Rhizobium meliloti by flow microfluorometry. J Bacteriol 129:1156–1158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Ferguson BJ, Indrasumunar A, Hayashi S, Lin M-H, Lin Y-H, Reid DE, Gresshoff PM. 2010. Molecular analysis of legume nodule development and autoregulation. J Integr Plant Biol 52:61–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.00899.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kondorosi E, Mergaert P, Kereszt A. 2013. A paradigm for endosymbiotic life: cell differentiation of Rhizobium bacteria provoked by host plant factors. Annu Rev Microbiol 67:611–628. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jordan DC, Grinyer I, Coulter WH. 1963. Electron microscopy of infection threads and bacteria in young root nodules of Medicago sativa. J Bacteriol 86:125–137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Dart PJ, Mercer FV. 1966. Fine structure of bacteroids in root nodules of Vigna sinensis, Acacia longifolia, Viminaria juncea, and Lupinus angustifolius. J Bacteriol 91:1314–1319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Goodchild DJ, Bergersen FJ. 1966. Electron microscopy of the infection and subsequent development of soybean nodule cells. J Bacteriol 92:204–213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.MacKenzie CR, Vail WJ, Jordan DC. 1973. Ultrastructure of free-living and nitrogen-fixing forms of Rhizobium meliloti as revealed by freeze-etching. J Bacteriol 113:387–393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Paau AS, Bloch CB, Brill WJ. 1980. Developmental fate of Rhizobium meliloti bacteroids in alfalfa nodules. J Bacteriol 143:1480–1490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Maroti G, Kondorosi E. 2014. Nitrogen-fixing Rhizobium-legume symbiosis: are polyploidy and host peptide-governed symbiont differentiation general principles of endosymbiosis? Front Microbiol 5:326. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Maroti G, Downie JA, Kondorosi E. 2015. Plant cysteine-rich peptides that inhibit pathogen growth and control rhizobial differentiation in legume nodules. Curr Opin Plant Biol 26:57–63. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2015.05.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Kereszt A, Mergaert P, Kondorosi E. 2011. Bacteroid development in legume nodules: evolution of mutual benefit or of sacrificial victims? Mol Plant Microbe Interact 24:1300–1309. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-06-11-0152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]