Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jan 14.
Published in final edited form as: Nature. 2016 Jun 2;534(7605):133–137. doi: 10.1038/nature17942

Extended Data Table 1.

Statistics of data collection, structural refinement and model validation

Batches Electron Microscope Camera Micrographs (Original micrographs) Particles for 2D classification Particles for 3D classification
1 F20 US4000 381(966) 76,323 19,253
2 Titan Krios Eagle 3,184(4,701) 154,785 133,455
3 Titan Krios K2 1,017(1,136) 90,888 35,096
4 Titan Krios K2 1,497(1,579) 200,292 100,956
5 Titan Krios K2 997(1,002) 128,515 54,574
6 Titan Krios K2 1,114(1,114) 139,309 54,257
7 Titan Krios K2 1,014(1,016) 134,937 50,334
8 Titan Krios K2 833(852) 184,222 143,707
9 Titan Krios K2 901(901) 225,167 146,349
10 Titan Krios K2 1,019(1019) 248,518 157,947
Data Collection
 EM equipment FEI Titan krios
 Voltage (kV) 300
 Detector Gatan K2
 Particles 191,848
 Pixel size (Å) 1.32
 Defocus range (μm) 1.0–2.0
 Electron dose (e2) 50 (32 frames)/22 (frame 3–16)
Model composition
 Peptide chains 54
 Protein residues 13,982
 RNA chains 3
 RNA bases 3,446
Refinement
 Resolution (Å) 3.08
 Map sharpening B-factor (Å2) −65
 R factor 0.3040
 Fourier Shell Correlation 0.7814
Rms deviations
 Bonds (Å) 0.0054
 Angels(°) 0.9687
Validation (proteins)
 Molprobity score 2.43 (96th percentile)
 Clashscore, all atoms 3.44 (100th percentile)
 Good rotamers (%) 80.87
Ramachandran plot
 Favored (%) 88.14
 Outliers (%) 3.46
Validation (RNA)
 Correct sugar puckers (%) 97.16
 Good backbone conformations (%) 71.60