Abstract
Molecular Pathways Brain Database (MPDB), is a novel database for molecular information of the brain pathways and is an initiative to provide an organized platform for researchers in the field of neuro-informatics. The database currently has information from 1850 molecules for three different sensory pathways namely olfactory transduction, photo transduction and long-term potentiation. The usefulness of the database is demonstrated by an analysis of the olfactory transduction pathway which helps understand their olfactory specifity and further indicates that some of the molecules have evolved independently among these organisms as per the need of time and function. The database is available for free at http://pranag.physics.iisc.ernet.in/mpdb/
Availability:
The database is available for free at http://pranag.physics.iisc.ernet.in/mpdb/
Keywords: gene, protein, brain pathways, database, MPDB
Background
Neuroscience related databases help understand the brain better [1],[2]. However, they lack molecular level pathway information. This led to the creation of Molecular Pathways Brain Database (MPDB), which could be a resource for analysing molecular networks of the brain. Many types of databases like transcriptome database [3] and image databases [4] have been created in the recent decades. There is also a molecular database called DOR (Database of Olfactory Receptors) [5] which provides information only about olfactory receptor molecules in the OT pathway whereas MPDB concentrates on all the molecules involved in the OT pathway and also all the pathways in brain.
Methodology
Data collection
The information related to the molecules involved in brain pathways were retrieved from data sources: KEGG, UniProt, PDB, HPRD, NCBI. Molecular interaction data was acquired from databases: STRING, IntAct, DIP, CGNC, HGNC. The basic information of molecules like gene name, gene length, chromosome location, protein name, protein length, protein function, protein localization, ligand information, protein structure, string interactions were collected and integrated. The collected information were used to create the database using HTML, CSS, JavaScript for the front end, PHP for the interface and MySQL for the backend. The flowchart of the database construction is shown in (Figure 1).
Figure 1.

Flowchart of database creation: Software tools were used for designing the front end (HTML, CSS, JavaScript), interface (PHP) and backend (MySQL). The flow of information on querying is shown. The molecular profile in terms of gene orprotein ids, sequence details, structure information, ligand details were obtained from searching KEGG, UniProt, PDB, HPRD, NCBI while the interaction data were from STRING, IntAct, DIP, CGNC, HGNC. These were incorporated into tables with properties as shown for the search and retrieval.
Structure of MPDB
MPDB is non-redundant database accessible through a web interface available at http://pranag.physics.iisc.ernet.in/ mpdb/. MPDB is searched by selecting either pathways or structure from a pop-up menu. “Pathways” search allows the user to retrieve the details regarding the molecules involved in a particular pathway or the details of molecules from all pathways. The “Structure” search leads to a page where three options “Structure”, “Model” and “Structural Genomics Initiative (SGI)” are provided. This helps the user in getting the information about the brain molecules that already have structure, molecules that do not have structure but can be modelled and molecules with neither structure information nor template to model. This is obtained through “Structure”, “Model” and “Structural Genomics Initiative (SGI)” options respectively. “Structure” shows information like “protein name”,” PDB ID”, “structure resolution”, “function”, “protein size” and “Mutation”. “Model” displays particulars about “molecule name”, “Pathway involved”, “PDB_ID of the template model”,” identity of the template” and “query coverage”. Finally, structural genomics initiative class shows “molecules name” and “pathway” for the molecules involved in the brain which have neither structure information nor template to use for modelling.
Sequence analysis
Analysis of sequences of protein sequences of molecules from the MPDB were done with ClustalW (http:// www .ebi.ac.uk/2can/tutorials /nucleotide/ clustalw.html) and Jalview (www.jalview.org). Alignment scores for the sequences were calculated using the following formula: Alignment Score = Percentage Identity/ Alignment length. Dividing the percentage identity by alignment length ensures that, small alignments with high identity do not bias the result. Standard deviation (SD) was calculated for average percentage identity of the molecules and the range of standard deviation was calculated by the following formula: Maximum Deviation = Mean value + SD, Minimum Deviation = Mean value – SD. MEGA 5.1.4 (http:// www.megasoftware.net/) software was used for constructing phylograms. Multiple sequence alignment was implemented in MEGA using ClustalW and the phylogenetic tree was built using Neighbor-joining method. For the phylogram analysis, 100 bootstrap replications were performed.
Features
Currently, the database consists of 1850 molecules from three different sensory pathways namely olfactory transduction (OT) [6], photo transduction (PT) [7] and long term potentiation (LTP) [8].
Analysis of olfactory transduction (OT) pathway
Olfaction is a chemosensory process of sensing smell in which volatile odorant molecules bind to specific receptors present on olfactory epithelium in nose to activate a series of chemical reactions that finally transduces the signal to the brain. About 16 molecules participate in the OT pathway cascade to achieve the function [9].
In order to find the evolutionary relationship of the OT pathway 23 molecules (Figure 2) were aligned and their phylograms were compared with the standard taxonomic tree. There is no reasonable comparison between the clustering of molecules based on their sequences and the standard taxonomic clustering implying differential evolutionary pressures at the macroscopic and molecular level.
Figure 2.

Analysis of Olfactory Transduction (OT) pathway based on data from MPDB: A) Plot showing the conservation and variation of molecules along the First Secondary messenger (cAMP) pathway. The numbering on X-axis indicates the molecules involved along the pathway (1-GNAL, 2-ADCY3, 3-CNGA3, 4-CALM1, 5-CALM2, 6-CALM3, 7-CAMK2A, 8-CAMK2D, 9- CAMK2G, and 10-CLCA1) and Y-axis denotes the average percentage identity; B) Plot showing the conservation and variation of molecules along the Second Secondary messenger (cGMP) pathway. The numbering on X-axis indicates the molecules involved along the pathway (1-GUCA1A, 2-GUCA1B, 3-PRKG1, 4-PRKX, 5-PRKACA, 6-PRKACB and 7-PDC) and Y-axis denotes the average percentage identity. The pink line indicates the Mean value and the blue line indicate the range of standard deviation (SD), i.e. Maximum deviation (Mean + SD) and Minimum deviation (Mean – SD). The blue box indicates the molecules that are conserved along the pathway of the organisms and red boxes indicate molecules that show variation among the organisms; C) and D) Clustering of organisms based on the molecular information from Molecular Pathways Brain Database.
As OT pathway is a dual secondary messenger pathway [10], 7 molecules from first secondary messenger pathway and 10 molecules from second secondary messenger pathway for five different organisms (for which molecule information is available) were taken for the analysis. It was found that in first secondary- messenger pathway the initial and final molecules like CALM1, CALM2, CALM3, CAMK2A, CAMK2D, CAMK2G show variations among organisms while the molecules like GNAL, ADCY3, CNGA3 and CLCA1 in the middle of the pathway are more conserved. However, the second secondary messenger pathway does not show this pattern and only molecules like PRKX and PDC showed significant variation among organisms. Though the same molecules are involved in the pathway among different vertebrates, the number of components of these molecules varies from organism to organism. Amphibians have only second secondary messenger pathway and the first secondary messenger pathway is not developed in them. Molecules like CLCA2 and CLCA4 are only present in terrestrial vertebrates and are not necessary for olfaction in aquatic life.
The analysis of the OT pathway using the MPDB helps in understanding about how individual molecules evolved during species divergence. The variation in number of components in the pathway among organisms perhaps confers specificity for their ability to smell. The molecules seem to have evolved independently among organisms as per their functional requirements.
Further development
Pathways such as taste transduction, long term depression, cholinergic synapse, Dopaminergic synapse, GABAergic synapse [11] need to be incorporated with specific reference to neurodegenerative diseases.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge DBT for the Centre of Excellence in Bioinformatics at School of Biotechnology, Madurai Kamaraj University. We thank Prof. K. Sekar of Indian Institute of Science (Bangalore) for hosting the database. We also thank DST-INSPIRE for the fellowship to GMV.
Footnotes
Citation: Vigneshwari et al. Bioinformation 12(2): 32-35 (2016)
References
- 1.Van Essen DC. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2002;12:574. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(02)00361-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Skoufos E, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28:341. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Sun J, et al. Mar Biotechnol(NY). 2013;15:244. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rosano C, et al. Neuroepidemiology. 2005;24:221. doi: 10.1159/000085140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nagarathnam B, et al. Bioinform Biol Insights. 2014;8:147. doi: 10.4137/BBI.S14858. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hildebrand JG. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92:67. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.1.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Jindrova H. Physiol Res. 1998;47:155. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Malenka RC, Nicoll RA. Science. 1999;285:1870. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5435.1870. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Paysan J, Breer H. Pflugers Arch. 2001;441:579. doi: 10.1007/s004240000492. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ache BW, Zhainazarov A. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1995;5:461. doi: 10.1016/0959-4388(95)80006-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kanehisa M, et al. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D457. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1070. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
