Abstract
The response of blood vessels to physiological and pathological stimuli partly depends on the cross talk between endothelial cells (EC) lining the luminal side and smooth muscle cells (SMC) building the inner part of the vascular wall. Thus, the in vitro analysis of the pathophysiology of blood vessels requires coculture systems of EC and SMC. We have developed and validated a modified three-dimensional sandwich coculture (3D SW-CC) of EC and SMC using open μ-Slides with a thin glass bottom allowing direct imaging. The culture dish comprises an intermediate plate to minimize the meniscus resulting in homogenous cell distribution. Human umbilical artery SMC were sandwiched between coatings of rat tail collagen I. Following SMC quiescence, human umbilical vein EC were seeded on top of SMC and cultivated until confluence. By day 7, EC had formed a confluent monolayer and continuous vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin-positive cell/cell contacts. Below, spindle-shaped SMC had formed parallel bundles and showed increased calponin expression compared to day 1. EC and SMC were interspaced by a matrix consisting of laminin, collagen IV, and perlecan. Basal messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of E-selectin, angiopoietin-1, calponin, and intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) of the 3D SW-CC was comparable to that of a freshly isolated mouse inferior vena cava. Addition of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF α) to the 3D SW-CC induced E-selectin and ICAM-1 mRNA and protein induction, comparable to the EC and SMC monolayers. In contrast, the addition of activated platelets induced a significantly delayed but more pronounced activation in the 3D SW-CC compared to EC and SMC monolayers. Thus, this 3D SW-CC permits analyzing the cross talk between EC and SMC that mediate cellular quiescence as well as the response to complex activation signals.
Keywords: : 3D model, coculture, cross talk, endothelial cells, extracellular matrix, platelets, smooth muscle cells
Introduction
The tunica intima of arteries and veins consists of a monolayer of endothelial cells (EC) resting on a basal membrane and a stratum subendotheliale and is separated from the tunica media by the internal elastic membrane. The stratum subendotheliale, also called lamina propria intimae, consists of loose connective tissue intermingled with smooth muscle cells (SMC). In adult vasculature, SMC are in a contractile state (i.e., quiescent/nonproliferating) and form direct contacts with EC.1,2 Under physiological conditions, the quiescent state of cells within the vessel wall is maintained by diffusible and contact-dependent signals between the cells and their extracellular matrix.3 For example, angiopoietin 1, secreted mainly by vascular SMC, binds and activates tie2, a transmembrane receptor tyrosine kinase, expressed on EC surface, which then activates akt, a cell survival kinase, thereby aiding in the maintenance of vascular quiescence.4–6 These EC-SMC interactions are also important during angiogenesis. SMC recruited by EC7 stabilize the newly formed vascular wall by rendering quiescence and by producing extracellular matrix. Other cellular mediators involved in EC-SMC signaling leading to vessel wall maturation, survival, and quiescence are vascular endothelial growth factor A,8 transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β),9 and endothelial differentiation sphingolipid G-protein-coupled receptor-1.10 Thus, EC-SMC signaling is crucial for maintaining the vascular tone and it's functionality in vivo.
An example of a disturbed cross talk between EC and SMC resulting in vessel wall pathology comes from vascular bypass surgery11 or stenting.12 As an adverse event of this procedure, the stratum subendotheliale may become enlarged, mainly due to EC dysfunction13 and phenotype change of the SMC from contractile to secretory/proliferative.14 This phenomenon is called intimal hyperplasia and causes lumen narrowing and subsequently reocclusion of the grafted vessel.15 Hence, to study the pathological cross talk between EC and SMC in vitro, it is important to create a quiescent EC-SMC coculture which can be activated in a controlled environment. EC-SMC cocultures must overcome several obstacles. SMC require serum starvation to acquire a contractile phenotype, while EC require serum to proliferate and form a uniform monolayer. A secretory SMC phenotype prevents EC monolayer formation, and a confluent EC monolayer is required to keep SMC in a contractile state.16 Several EC-SMC cocultures have been described. EC directly cultivated on SMC,17 cocultures on opposite sides of a transwell membrane,18 culture of EC on collagen gels containing SMC,19 and spheroid-bound EC/SMC cocultures.20 In most cases, the morphology and orientation of cells within the cocultures, the formation of an extracellular matrix, and the basal expression of activation and quiescence markers were not systematically analyzed. In the current study, we have developed and validated a modified three-dimensional sandwich coculture (3D SW-CC) using human umbilical artery SMC and human umbilical vein EC.
Materials and Methods
Cells and tissue
Human umbilical vein EC were isolated from umbilical cords as described,21 grown in Iscove's Modified Dulbecco's Medium (GIBCO, Paisley, United Kingdom) containing 20% fetal calf serum (GIBCO) and EC growth supplement (50 μg/mL; PromoCell) and used between passages 2 and 4. Human umbilical artery SMC were isolated from the umbilical cord arteries using a modified protocol.22 Briefly, umbilical arteries were stripped of the surrounding Wharton's jelly, dissected longitudinally, cut into small pieces, and placed with their luminal side facing down on a Petri dish coated with 1% gelatin. Pieces were covered with growth medium (PromoCell) supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum (GIBCO) and a supplement mix (PromoCell) consisting of 0.5 ng/mL recombinant human epidermal growth factor, 2 ng/mL recombinant human basic fibroblast growth factor, and 5 μg/mL recombinant human insulin. Outgrowing cells were subpassaged and used between passages 4 and 6.
Inferior vena cava (IVC) were taken from 12-week-old male C57BL/6J mice following anesthesia with isoflurane and cervical dislocation and processed immediately.
Isolation of rat tail collagen I
The technique was described previously.23 Briefly, following removal of the rat tail skin, each second vertebra was broken; the tendons were extracted and placed in ethanol. Following air-drying, they were placed in 0.1% acetic acid and centrifuged at 4°C at 17000 g for 1 h. Supernatants containing the clear acid extracted collagen I (as verified by western blotting, data not shown) were aliquoted and stored at −20°C.
Cell culture
EC, SMC, as well as the cocultures were grown in μ-Slide 4 Well Ph+ slides (Ibidi) coated with rat tail collagen I. Rat tail collagen I was polymerized as described.24 Briefly, 1 mL of rat tail collagen I was mixed with 125 μL of 10 × M199 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) by pipetting on ice, until the solution turned yellow. To this, 125 μL of reconstitution buffer (2.2 g NaHCO3 in 100 mL of 0.05 N NaOH and 200 mM HEPES) was added, which turned the solution pink. The pH was adjusted to 7.1–7.4. μ-Slide 4 Well Ph+ slides were placed on ice and coated with ice cold collagen I solution. Excess fluid was aspirated by a pipette. The slides were then incubated at 37°C for 30 min to allow collagen I polymerization.
For the 3D SW-CC, SMC (100,000 cells) suspended in 700 μL of SMC growth medium were seeded on top of the collagen I coating and incubated at 37°C for 45 min. Then, cells were washed using 1 × Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline with calcium and magnesium (Lonza, Basel, Switzerland). Adherent SMC were covered with a second coating of collagen I. Following collagen I polymerization, smooth muscle growth medium was added and cells were incubated at 37°C. On day 3, the growth medium was replaced with serum-free quiescence medium Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium F12 (DMEM F12; Invitrogen, Paisley, United Kingdom), containing 1% insulin–transferrin–selenium (GIBCO), 1% l-glutamine (Invitrogen), and 1% Pen Strep (Invitrogen).17 On day 5, EC (150,000 cells) in 700 μL of EC growth medium containing 20% fetal calf serum were added to the SMC sandwich and incubated at 37°C in a cell culture incubator for 48 h. On day 7, EC growth medium was replaced with CC medium EBM-2 (EC basal medium-2, Clonetics; Lonza) supplemented with 3.3% fetal calf serum (GIBCO), 1% Insulin Transferrin Selenium (GIBCO), and Gentamycin (1:200; GIBCO). The 3D SW-CC was then incubated and maintained at 37°C in a cell culture incubator with 5% CO2 for 15–20 days with fresh medium changes every 2nd day.
EC and SMC were also cocultured in μ-Slide 4 Well Ph+ slides, following the same protocol as above, omitting the collagen I sandwiching step (CC). This CC served as a control for the validation of 3D SW-CC.
Antibodies and reagents
The following primary antibodies were used: rabbit polyclonal anti-human vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin (160840, 1:100; Cayman Chemical), mouse monoclonal anti-Heparan Sulfate Proteoglycan 2 (ab23418, 1:100; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-collagen IV (ab6586, 1:200; Abcam), rabbit polyclonal anti-laminin (ab11575, 1:200; Abcam), Pacific Blue™ human integrin alpha-IIb (CD41) (303714; BioLegend, San Diego, CA), Cy3 labeled mouse monoclonal anti-α-smooth muscle actin (clone HIP8, 1:300; Sigma), PE labeled anti-human homing cell adhesion molecule (CD44) (338807; BioLegend), mouse monoclonal anti-intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) (BBIG-I1, 1:200; R&D Systems), mouse monoclonal anti-E-selectin (BBA2, 1:100; R&D Systems), 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; D9542, 1:5000; Sigma-Aldrich), and FITC-conjugated rabbit polyclonal anti-VE-Cadherin (ab33321, 1:100; Abcam). Secondary antibodies were as follows: Cy5-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (115–175-166, 1:500; Jackson Laboratories), Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-mouse (A-11001, 1:500; Thermo Fisher), Alexa Fluor 633 goat anti-mouse (A-21053, 1:500; Thermo Fisher), and Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit (A-11034, 1:500; ThermoFisher). ECL plus (Amersham) was used for developing the western blots. For stimulation experiments, human recombinant transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-β1) (240-B-010; R&D Systems) and recombinant human tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF α; 300-01A; PeproTech) were used. For platelet isolation, 3.2% sodium citrate (BD Biosciences) and 1 μM prostaglandin I2 (Sigma-Aldrich) were used.
Immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy
In all imaging procedures, cells were directly analyzed within the μ-Slide 4 Well Ph+ slides. Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 20 min at room temperature, washed (three times) with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), permeabilized by using 0.5% Triton-X 100 in PBS for 10 min, rinsed with PBS, and then incubated in PBS containing 2% bovine serum albumin, 0.1% (v/v) tween-20 for 1 h. The slides were then incubated with indicated primary antibodies (4°C, overnight), washed using PBS, followed by incubation with appropriate secondary antibodies (1 h, room temperature). Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Cells were then imaged by a confocal laser scanning microscope (LSM-700; Carl Zeiss) using a 20 × lens (numeric aperture 0.8) by making Z stack galleries starting from the bottom of the well reaching the top of the EC layer (0–20 μm). Z-stacks were created under the following conditions: The average line scanning number is 4, and the dimensions are for x: 1024, y: 1024, and z: 10, 8-bit. Spectral bleed through was prevented by sequential scanning of each fluorochrome in separate channels. Orthogonal cuts and 3D reconstruction were made by using the Zen 2.1 lite software.
Western blot
Three-dimensional SW-CC on days 1, 3, 5, and 7 were lysed in 2 × reduced laemmli buffer, loaded onto a sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) gel, electrophoresed, and blotted. Membranes were blocked with 5% milk in 1 × PBST (0.1% (v/v) Tween 20 in 1 × PBS) followed by incubation with indicated primary and appropriate secondary antibodies. Bound antibodies were visualized by chemiluminescence and exposure to Hyperfilm ECL.
Real-time polymerase chain reaction
Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and reverse transcribed using the Revert Aid H First Strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas, Life Technologies). Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers for human and mouse E-selectin, ICAM-1, calponin, and angiopoietin-1 (FAM primers, Assay on demand) were purchased from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Reaction mixtures contained 12.5 μL of TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 1.25 μL Assay-on-demand, and 1 μL of complementary DNA into a total volume of 25 μL. Cycling parameters were as follows: 50°C for 2 min, 95°C for 10 min, followed by 40 cycles at 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 1 min. Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) for human samples and β-2 microglobulin (B2M) for mouse samples were used as housekeeping genes. Reactions were run on StepOnePlus real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) platform, and data analysis was performed with the StepOnePlus Software v2.0 (Applied Biosystems). Messenger RNA (mRNA) concentrations were calculated by subtracting CT of the housekeeping gene from CT of the target gene (ΔCT). The mean of ΔCT control was subtracted from the ΔCT target gene reaction (ΔΔCT) and calculated as 2(−ΔΔCT).
Human platelet isolation
Human platelets were isolated using the protocol as described.25 Briefly, venous blood from a healthy volunteer was collected in 3.2% sodium citrate and centrifuged at 125 g for 20 min. The upper third part of the plasma (platelet-rich plasma) was collected and incubated for 5 min with 1 μM prostaglandin I2 to inhibit platelet aggregation. Following centrifugation at 3000 g for 2 min, platelets were washed twice with PBS supplemented with prostaglandin I2 to remove fibrinogen. Platelets were resuspended in PBS, incubated for 25 min at room temperature to ensure PGI2 consumption, and coincubated with indicated cell cultures at a platelet-to-cell ratio of 100:1.
Statistical analysis
Statistics was performed by GraphPad Prism 5 (Graph Pad Software, Inc.). Results are calculated as mean ± SD. Significance was assessed by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA; Gaussian distribution was verified using Levene's and Bartlett's test), when comparing more than two groups followed by Tukey's multiple comparison post hoc test and Dunnett's post hoc test when groups were compared with a single control. For the stimulation experiments with TNF α and platelets involving different sample groups and time points, two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni post hoc test was used (*p < 0.05).
Results and Discussion
Morphology of the 3D SW-CC between days 1 and 7
Figure 1 schematically describes the procedure to construct a 3D SW-CC of SMC and EC. On day 1, SMC were seeded on collagen I coated Ibidi μ-Slide 4 Well Ph+ slides. Following attachment, they were covered by a second coating of collagen I. After 1 day, SMC were rhomboidal in shape (secretory or proliferative phenotype, Figs. 1A and 2A). On day 4, 24 h following serum starvation, they were spindle shaped. They were tightly packed and aligned in parallel bundles (Figs. 1B and 2A) indicative of contractile phenotype.26 On day 5, following EC seeding, SMC retained their contractile phenotype (Figs. 1C and 2A) despite the fact that the medium now contained serum. This contractile phenotype of SMC is essential, since a secretory phenotype would prevent or disrupt endothelial monolayer formation.16 SMC sandwiched between two coatings of collagen I appear to be responsible for this “quiescence” effect. Omitting the top layer of collagen I or mixing SMC with collagen I before seeding activated SMC, when EC were seeded on top (not shown). Collagen I seems to mediate this “quiescence” effect by preventing initial contact formation between SMC and EC at the time of EC seeding. Collagen I, a matrix protein found abundantly within the tunica media of blood vessels, could also directly support a contractile phenotype of the SMC.27 On day 7, EC had completely covered the SMC sandwich forming a continuous and uniform monolayer of cobblestone-shaped cells (Figs. 1D and 2A). Of note, the use of an intermediate plate in our 3D SW-CC prevented meniscus formation at the corners of the well. It not only allowed better imaging but also prevented SMC cluster formation and supported an even distribution of cells.
To further characterize the dynamics of this system, we performed western blots to analyze the expression of cyclin D1 (CCND1) as a marker for cell proliferation,28 calponin (CNN1) as a marker for SMC differentiation,29 and vascular endothelial (VE)-cadherin as an EC marker (Fig. 2B). Beta actin was used as the loading control. Cyclin D1 expression was highest on day 1, confirming the secretory/proliferative phenotype of the SMC, and was significantly reduced on day 4 confirming quiescence of the SMC. The addition of EC on day 5 increased cyclin D1 levels, which were again decreased on day 7 (Fig. 2B). Calponin expression levels of the 3D SW-CC showed a steady increase from day 1 until day 7, reaching highest expression on day 7, reflecting the phenotype change of SMC from secretory to contractile. VE-cadherin expression increased from day 5 to 7 and confirmed the presence of EC. The quiescence of the SW-CC at day 7 was further confirmed by the Edu cell proliferation assays (Supplementary Fig. S1A; Supplementary Data are available online at www.liebertpub.com/tec). Seeding densities of EC on top of SMC at ratios of 1:1 or 1.5:1 did not change outcomes (Supplementary Fig. S1B). To validate the separation of SMC and EC layers and the uniform distribution of cells, we used cell tracker™ orange-stained SMC and cell tracker green-stained EC to build and analyze the 3D SW-CC at day 7 by using a confocal microscope. A series of X-Y slices through the 3D SW-CC was scanned from different Z distances starting from the bottom of the well, and a 3D image was generated. Figure 3A exemplifies such a reconstruction. Figure 3B provides an orthogonal cut section and demonstrates the separation of SMC and EC layers. Immunofluorescence staining of the 3D SW-CC revealed that the alpha-smooth muscle actin-positive layer of SMC (red) was found approximately between 0 and 7 μm and the VE-cadherin-positive layer of EC (green) between 7 and 11.5 μm as measured from the bottom of the well (Fig. 3C and Supplementary Fig. S2A). Importantly, EC formed a uniform network of VE-cadherin-positive cell/cell contacts. Intensity profiles of red (α-smooth muscle actin) and green (VE-cadherin) channels confirmed the clear separation of SMC and EC (Supplementary Fig. S2B). To rule out endothelial–mesenchymal transition (EndMT), SW-CC was stained for CD44 (a surrogate marker for EndMT30). SMC monolayers constitutively expressed CD44 while EC monolayers as well as EC in the SW-CC were negative for CD44. TGF-β1-treated EC served as a positive control (Supplementary Fig. S2C). Figure 3D depicts the three-dimensional reconstruction (lateral and frontal view) of the EC and SMC within the 3D SW-CC, which further demonstrates the clear separation of the cell layers.
Vascular basement membrane matrix deposition in the 3D SW-CC
The vascular basement membrane matrix functions as a thin boundary between different compartments of the vessel wall. Type-IV collagen and laminins are the major components of the vascular basement membrane.31–33 They self-assemble to form networks making up the extracellular matrix. Other components include heparan sulfate proteoglycans (e.g., perlecan), nidogens, osteonectin (SPARC), fibulins, collagen types VIII, XV, and XVIII, and thrombospondins.34 This matrix has mechanical properties, plays a role in regulating the morphology and phenotype of SMC,35 in regulating the gene expression of neighboring cells, and is important during vasculogenesis and wound healing.34,36 Hence, we verified the presence and location of collagen IV, laminin, and perlecan in the 3D SW-CC. On day 7, the collagen IV and laminin staining was restricted to a 2–3-μm-thin layer between SMC and EC. Collagen IV produced a cobweb-like fibrillary network between SMC and EC (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Fig. S3A). Laminin showed a patchy distribution, distinct from of collagen IV (Fig. 4B and Supplementary Fig. S3B). It has been described previously that laminin polymerizes to form sheet-like nets or patches and collagen IV forms skeletal mesh-like polymeric arrays in vitro and in vivo37 similar to our results. Our confocal z-stack images show that differences in cell densities were not responsible for this patchy distribution of laminin. Perlecan (Fig. 4C and Supplementary Fig. S3C) was distributed as long thin continuous strands. Most of the perlecan localized at the interface of SMC and EC. However, in contrast to collagen IV and laminin, perlecan was also found intermingled with SMC reaching down to the bottom of the well. None of the three matrix proteins were found between EC.
These findings clearly indicate that SMC and EC within the 3D SW-CC rapidly produce their own extracellular interface similar to the vascular basement membrane matrix found in vivo. Collagen IV and laminins are known to promote the contractile SMC phenotype.26 Laminins are in direct contact with EC and SMC surfaces, they trap growth factors and control cellular functions like adhesion, proliferation, migration, and apoptosis.33,38 Laminins provide the substrate to which the basal side of the EC adheres through laminin-specific receptors.39 Heparan sulfate proteoglycans cooperate with other matrix components to configure the structure, function, and stability of the basement membrane.40 The major heparan sulfate proteoglycan of the vascular matrix is the EC-derived perlecan, which is a potent regulator of vascular homeostasis. On vascular SMC, perlecan acts antimigratory and antiproliferative and attenuates proliferation and the migratory response to platelet-derived growth factor BB (PDGF-BB).41,42 Conversely, on EC, it promotes mitogenesis,43 aids in vessel wall repair after injury, and supports angiogenesis.44 Thus, the autogenously produced vascular basement membrane aids to the stability and quiescence of our 3D SW-CC.
Differentiation and basal activation of the 3D SW-CC
We first analyzed the basal mRNA expression of vessel wall stability markers. Angiopoietin 1 belongs to a family of secreted glycoproteins that play a pivotal role in vascular development and angiogenesis. Within the context of EC, angiopoietin 1 is essential for their interaction with the surrounding matrix. It controls EC permeability, regulates EC survival, and has anti-inflammatory functions.45–51 The fold changes in mRNA expression of SW-CC, EC and SMC monolayers, and CC (coculture made without the collagen I sandwich) shown in Figure 5 were normalized to freshly isolated piece of mouse IVC. Angiopoietin 1 mRNA was present in SMC, but not in EC.48 In the SW-CC, angiopoietin 1 mRNA expression was multiplied, up to a level found in IVC in vivo. The CC system without the collagen I sandwich, where EC were directly seeded on top of SMC, was unable to produce angiopoietin 1 mRNA. Calponin, a filament-associated, actin-binding protein, is highly expressed in SMC that display a contractile phenotype.52,53 Its downregulation indicates a phenotype switch of SMC from contractile to secretory.54–56 The expression of comparable amounts of calponin mRNA in the IVC and in the SW-CC supports the morphologic observations (Figs. 2 and 3) that SMC in the SW-CC were contractile in phenotype.
We next analyzed basal mRNA expression of activation markers like E-selectin and ICAM-1. Quiescent EC express very low levels of E-selectin. ICAM-1 is constitutively expressed on EC and inducible on SMC.57–59 Values were normalized to those from a freshly isolated piece of mouse IVC. In the SW-CC as well as in EC cultures, E-selectin mRNA expression was marginally higher than in the IVC (Fig. 5). CT values were in the range of 27–29, indicating very low expression (B2M/GAPDH values were uniform across all samples). This correlated to E-selectin protein expression, which was undetectable under baseline conditions by immunofluorescence (Fig. 6B). However, in the coculture without the collagen I sandwich (CC), EC were activated and expressed significant amounts of E-selectin mRNA. Others have reported that in such a direct CC, SMC induce EC E-selectin in an IL-1- and IL-6-dependent manner.60 A similar result was obtained with ICAM-1. ICAM-1 mRNA expression was even lower in the SW-CC when compared to the IVC, probably due to ICAM-1 expression by resident fibroblasts or macrophages within the adventitia of the IVC, which are not present in the SW-CC.
TNF α and platelet-induced activation of the 3D SW-CC
We further analyzed the response of our 3D SW-CC to a proinflammatory cytokine, TNF α.61 For comparison, we selected a cellular activation signal by adding activated platelets to the SW-CC. Both, the EC monolayer and the 3D SW-CC, responded equally to TNF α stimulation by inducing E-selectin mRNA (after 1 h) and protein (after 4 h) expression (Fig. 6A, B). As expected, ICAM-1 mRNA (after 1 h) and protein (after 18 h) were induced in EC, SMC, and the 3D SW-CC once exposed to TNF α (Fig. 6C, D).
Activated platelets have been shown to induce endothelial E-selectin expression in a pathway involving platelet factor 4 and to induce ICAM-1 expression.62,63 Platelet-released factors induce proliferation, migration, and calponin downregulation in SMC, partly through platelet factor 4.64,65 When activated platelets were added to our 3D SW-CC, they adhered to the endothelial surfaces, but did not get in direct contact with the underlying SMC layer even after 24 h of coculture (Fig. 7B). Importantly, at this time point, the EC monolayer remained morphologically intact, but the underlying SMC had changed to a rhomboidal shape reminiscent of the secretory phenotype compared to the control (Fig. 7A). In addition, platelets induced significant amounts of E-selectin expression in the 3D SW-CC, although with a delay of 24 h compared with TNF α, where peak levels were achieved with 1 h incubation. Initial E-selectin induction (1 h) by platelets was higher in EC, and then declined, whereas in the 3D SW-CC maximum induction occurred at 24 h. A similar picture was also seen with the induction of ICAM-1 (Fig. 7C). This delayed but significantly increased E-selectin and ICAM-1 mRNA expression of the 3D SW-CC by activated platelets after 24 h has to be attributed to an EC/SMC cross talk within the system.
Conclusions
We have thus engineered a modified 3D direct contact CC model (3D SW-CC) of EC on SMC, which mimics several important aspects of an in vivo blood vessel. EC form continuous monolayers and SMC display a contractile phenotype. EC and SMC layers were in close contact but clearly separated by an autogenously produced vascular basement membrane. The basal expression of activation and quiescence markers was comparable to that of a freshly isolated mouse IVC. The system can be activated by TNF α a proinflammatory cytokine. Moreover, the system is also suitable to analyze the cross talk between cellular elements as shown by the addition of platelets. Platelets elicit a distinct response pattern when added to the 3D SW-CC compared with EC or SMC alone. Finally, this system is suitable for high-quality 3D confocal direct imaging and live cell imaging.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by a grant from the Austrian Science Foundation SFB F5408-B21 to P.P.
Disclosure Statement
No competing financial interests exist.
References
- 1.Canham P.B., et al. . Measurements from light and polarised light microscopy of human coronary arteries fixed at distending pressure. Cardiovasc Res 23, 973, 1989 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Gasser T.C., Ogden R.W., and Holzapfel G.A. Hyperelastic modelling of arterial layers with distributed collagen fibre orientations. J R Soc Interface 3, 15, 2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lilly B. We have contact: endothelial cell-smooth muscle cell interactions. Physiology (Bethesda) 29, 234, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Davis S., et al. . Isolation of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, by secretion-trap expression cloning. Cell 87, 1161, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Papapetropoulos A., et al. . Direct actions of angiopoietin-1 on human endothelium: evidence for network stabilization, cell survival, and interaction with other angiogenic growth factors. Lab Invest 79, 213, 1999 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fukuhara S., et al. . Angiopoietin-1/Tie2 receptor signaling in vascular quiescence and angiogenesis. Histol Histopathol 25, 387, 2010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hellstrom M., et al. . Role of PDGF-B and PDGFR-beta in recruitment of vascular smooth muscle cells and pericytes during embryonic blood vessel formation in the mouse. Development 126, 3047, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hoeben A., et al. . Vascular endothelial growth factor and angiogenesis. Pharmacol Rev 56, 549, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pepper M.S. Transforming growth factor-beta: vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, and vessel wall integrity. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 8, 21, 1997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Liu Y., et al. . Edg-1, the G protein-coupled receptor for sphingosine-1-phosphate, is essential for vascular maturation. J Clin Invest 106, 951, 2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Purcell C., Tennant M., and McGeachie J. Neo-intimal hyperplasia in vascular grafts and its implications for autologous arterial grafting. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79, 164, 1997 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kornowski R., et al. . In-stent restenosis: contributions of inflammatory responses and arterial injury to neointimal hyperplasia. J Am Coll Cardiol 31, 224, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kipshidze N., et al. . Role of the endothelium in modulating neointimal formation: vasculoprotective approaches to attenuate restenosis after percutaneous coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol 44, 733, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rivard A., and Andres V. Vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation in the pathogenesis of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Histol Histopathol 15, 557, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mitra A.K., Gangahar D.M., and Agrawal D.K. Cellular, molecular and immunological mechanisms in the pathophysiology of vein graft intimal hyperplasia. Immunol Cell Biol 84, 115, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Rose S.L., and Babensee J.E. Complimentary endothelial cell/smooth muscle cell co-culture systems with alternate smooth muscle cell phenotypes. Ann Biomed Eng 35, 1382, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Wallace C.S., Champion J.C., and Truskey G.A. Adhesion and function of human endothelial cells co-cultured on smooth muscle cells. Ann Biomed Eng 35, 375, 2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fillinger M.F., et al. . The effect of endothelial cell coculture on smooth muscle cell proliferation. J Vasc Surg 17, 1058; discussion 1067, 1993 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.van Buul-Wortelboer M.F., et al. . Reconstitution of the vascular wall in vitro. A novel model to study interactions between endothelial and smooth muscle cells. Exp Cell Res 162, 151, 1986 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Korff T., et al. . Blood vessel maturation in a 3-dimensional spheroidal coculture model: direct contact with smooth muscle cells regulates endothelial cell quiescence and abrogates VEGF responsiveness. FASEB J 15, 447, 2001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Petzelbauer P., et al. . IL-8 and angiogenesis: evidence that human endothelial cells lack receptors and do not respond to IL-8 in vitro. Cytokine 7, 267, 1995 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Leik C.E., et al. . Isolation and culture of arterial smooth muscle cells from human placenta. Hypertension 43, 837, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rajan N., et al. . Preparation of ready-to-use, storable and reconstituted type I collagen from rat tail tendon for tissue engineering applications. Nat Protoc 1, 2753, 2006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Artym V. V. and Matsumoto K. Imaging Cells in Three-Dimensional Collagen Matrix. Current Protocols in Cell Biology. 48:10.18:10.18.1–10.18.20, 2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Assinger A., et al. . Human cytomegalovirus-platelet interaction triggers toll-like receptor 2-dependent proinflammatory and proangiogenic responses. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 34, 801, 2014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rensen S.S., Doevendans P.A., and van Eys G.J. Regulation and characteristics of vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic diversity. Neth Heart J 15, 100, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ponticos M., et al. . Regulation of collagen type I in vascular smooth muscle cells by competition between Nkx2.5 and deltaEF1/ZEB1. Mol Cell Biol 24, 6151, 2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Stacey D.W. Cyclin D1 serves as a cell cycle regulatory switch in actively proliferating cells. Curr Opin Cell Biol 15, 158, 2003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Birukov K.G., et al. . Expression of calponin in rabbit and human aortic smooth muscle cells. Cell Tissue Res 266, 579, 1991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Medici D. Endothelial-mesenchymal transition in regenerative medicine. Stem Cells Int 2016, 6962801, 2016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Timpl R., and Brown J.C. Supramolecular assembly of basement membranes. Bioessays 18, 123, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tanjore H., and Kalluri R. The role of type IV collagen and basement membranes in cancer progression and metastasis. Am J Pathol 168, 715, 2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Aumailley M., and Smyth N. The role of laminins in basement membrane function. J Anat 193, 1, 1998 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Wagenseil J.E., and Mecham R.P. Vascular extracellular matrix and arterial mechanics. Physiol Rev 89, 957, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hungerford J.E., and Little C.D. Developmental biology of the vascular smooth muscle cell: building a multilayered vessel wall. J Vasc Res 36, 2, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hayden M.R., Sowers J.R., and Tyagi S.C. The central role of vascular extracellular matrix and basement membrane remodeling in metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes: the matrix preloaded. Cardiovasc Diabetol 4, 9, 2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Farquhar M.G. The Glomerular Basement Membrane. In: ED H., (ed.). Cell biology of extracellular matrix, 2nd edn. New York: Plenum Press, 1991, pp. 365–418 [Google Scholar]
- 38.Terranova V.P., Rohrbach D.H., and Martin G.R. Role of laminin in the attachment of PAM 212 (epithelial) cells to basement membrane collagen. Cell 22, 719, 1980 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Languino L.R., et al. . Endothelial cells use alpha 2 beta 1 integrin as a laminin receptor. J Cell Biol 109, 2455, 1989 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sarrazin S, Lamanna WC, Esko JD. Heparan sulfate protoglycans. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 3, a004952, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Nugent M.A., Karnovsky M.J., and Edelman E.R. Vascular cell-derived heparan sulfate shows coupled inhibition of basic fibroblast growth factor binding and mitogenesis in vascular smooth muscle cells. Circ Res 73, 1051, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Garl P.J., et al. . Perlecan-induced suppression of smooth muscle cell proliferation is mediated through increased activity of the tumor suppressor PTEN. Circ Res 94, 175, 2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Aviezer D., et al. . Perlecan, basal lamina proteoglycan, promotes basic fibroblast growth factor-receptor binding, mitogenesis, and angiogenesis. Cell 79, 1005, 1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Iozzo R.V., and San Antonio J.D. Heparan sulfate proteoglycans: heavy hitters in the angiogenesis arena. J Clin Invest 108, 349, 2001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gavard J., Patel V., and Gutkind J.S. Angiopoietin-1 prevents VEGF-induced endothelial permeability by sequestering Src through mDia. Dev Cell 14, 25, 2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Thurston G., et al. . Leakage-resistant blood vessels in mice transgenically overexpressing angiopoietin-1. Science 286, 2511, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Papapetropoulos A., et al. . Angiopoietin-1 inhibits endothelial cell apoptosis via the Akt/survivin pathway. J Biol Chem 275, 9102, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kim I., et al. . Angiopoietin-1 regulates endothelial cell survival through the phosphatidylinositol 3′-Kinase/Akt signal transduction pathway. Circ Res 86, 24, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Gamble J.R., et al. . Angiopoietin-1 is an antipermeability and anti-inflammatory agent in vitro and targets cell junctions. Circ Res 87, 603, 2000 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Pizurki L., et al. . Angiopoietin-1 inhibits endothelial permeability, neutrophil adherence and IL-8 production. Br J Pharmacol 139, 329, 2003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Suri C., et al. . Requisite role of angiopoietin-1, a ligand for the TIE2 receptor, during embryonic angiogenesis. Cell 87, 1171, 1996 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Duband J.L., et al. . Calponin and SM 22 as differentiation markers of smooth muscle: spatiotemporal distribution during avian embryonic development. Differentiation 55, 1, 1993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Takahashi K., Hiwada K., and Kokubu T. Vascular smooth muscle calponin. A novel troponin T-like protein. Hypertension 11, 620, 1988 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Long X., et al. . Smooth muscle calponin: an unconventional CArG-dependent gene that antagonizes neointimal formation. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 31, 2172, 2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Yang H.M., et al. . PPARgamma modulates vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype via a protein kinase G-dependent pathway and reduces neointimal hyperplasia after vascular injury. Exp Mol Med 45, e65, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cordes K.R., et al. . miR-145 and miR-143 regulate smooth muscle cell fate and plasticity. Nature 460, 705, 2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Leeuwenberg J.F., et al. . E-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 are released by activated human endothelial cells in vitro. Immunology 77, 543, 1992 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Braun M., et al. . Cellular adhesion molecules on vascular smooth muscle cells. Cardiovasc Res 41, 395, 1999 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Springer T.A. Adhesion receptors of the immune system. Nature 346, 425, 1990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chiu J.J., et al. . Mechanisms of induction of endothelial cell E-selectin expression by smooth muscle cells and its inhibition by shear stress. Blood 110, 519, 2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Pober J.S., and Cotran R.S. Cytokines and endothelial cell biology. Physiol Rev 70, 427, 1990 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Yu G., et al. . Endothelial expression of E-selectin is induced by the platelet-specific chemokine platelet factor 4 through LRP in an NF-kappaB-dependent manner. Blood 105, 3545, 2005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Gawaz M., et al. . Activated platelets induce monocyte chemotactic protein-1 secretion and surface expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 on endothelial cells. Circulation 98, 1164, 1998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Jawien A., et al. . Platelet-derived growth factor promotes smooth muscle migration and intimal thickening in a rat model of balloon angioplasty. J Clin Invest 89, 507, 1992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Shi G., et al. . Platelet factor 4 mediates vascular smooth muscle cell injury responses. Blood 121, 4417, 2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.