Skip to main content
World Journal of Surgical Oncology logoLink to World Journal of Surgical Oncology
. 2017 Jan 17;15:26. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-1083-2

Study on expression of CDH4 in lung cancer

Zhupeng Li 1, Dan Su 2, Lisha Ying 2, Guangmao Yu 1, Weimin Mao 3,
PMCID: PMC5240236  PMID: 28095912

Abstract

Background

The human CDH4 gene, which encodes the R-cadherin protein, has an important role in cell migration and cell adhesion, sorting, tissue morphogenesis, and tumor genesis. This study analyzed the relationship of CDH4 mRNA expression with lung cancer.

Methods

Real time PCR was applied to detect CDH4 mRNA transcription in 142 paired cases of lung cancer and noncancerous regions.

Results

No correlation was identified between CDH4 mRNA expression and gender, age, lymphnode metastasis, TNM stage, family history, smoking state, drinking state (P > 0.05), but grade and histotype (P < 0.05). The relative CDH4 mRNA value was remarkably decreased in lung cancer tissues compared with noncancerous tissues (P = 0.001).

Conclusions

We found that CDH4 mRNA expression was associated with grade and histotype. What is more, the relative CDH4 mRNA value was decreased in the lung cancer tissues. Our results suggested that CDH4 might be a putative tumor suppressor gene (TSG) in lung cancer.

Keywords: CDH4, Lung cancer, Tumor suppressor gene

Background

Lung cancer has the highest morbidity and mortality in malignant tumors and with a total of 1.5 million deaths annually worldwide [1]. In the patients with lung cancer, though diagnosis and treatment have been greatly advanced, the 5-year survival rate remains low [2, 3]. Many etiological factors correlate with lung cancer, for example, genetic susceptibility, environmental factors, smoking, and so on, but the mechanism of lung cancer development and progression is yet unclear.

Cadherins are transmembrane adhesion, calcium-dependent molecules, which have a lot of functions, for instance, cell signaling, cell–cell cohesion, and inhibition of apoptosis [4]. Cadherins regulate cell growth, mobility, and differentiation by binding through the cytoplasmic domain to b-catenin or c-catenin [5]. More than 100 cadherins have been found with diverse protein structures.

R-cadherin is a classic cadherin, which is important for the differentiation of kidney, striated muscle, brain, and so on [6, 7]. R-cadherin plays a critical role in maintaining cell polarity and tissue architecture in normal gastrointestinal epithelial tissue [8].

The human CDH4 gene encodes the R-cadherin protein, which is located on chromosome 20q13.3 [9]. Previous reports have showed that R-cadherin is involved in cell migration, cell adhesion, sorting, tissue morphogenesis, and tumorgenesis. CDH4 might be a tumor suppressor gene in various cancers, such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma, gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer [1012]. However, the CDH4 expression in lung cancer and its’ correlation with lung cancer clinical characteristics were still unclear.

In this study, we first investigated the transcription levels of CDH4 mRNA in lung cancer tissues and paired noncancerous regions, to explore the relationship between CDH4 mRNA and clinical characteristics, and attempted to illustrate that CDH4 was a tumor suppressor gene (TSG) in lung cancer.

Methods

Clinical tissue samples

We collected 142 pair cases of fresh carcinoma and normal tissues from patients with lung cancer, all of them underwent surgery in Zhejiang Cancer Hospital from May 2012 to May 2013. Normal tissues were obtained as far (at least 5 cm) from the tumor tissue as possible. We froze the samples in liquid nitrogen and stored them at −80 °C as soon as possible. All of the patients did not receive preoperative radiochemotherapy. Patient clinical characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The classification criteria of International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer and the World Health Organization (IASLC/WHO) were used for histodiagnosis [13]. The TNM stage of the disease was determined by the new IASLC staging methods [14]. Our research was approved by Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Ethics Committee. Informed consents were provided for all patients before surgery.

Table 1.

The correlation between clinical characteristics and CDH4 mRNA expression in lung cancer tissue

Variable N CDH4 mRNA P
Median (mean, range)
Gender 0.137
 Female 28 0.088(0.190, 0.019–1.367)
 Male 114 0.075(0.141, 0.012–2.661)
Age 0.539
 <65 99 0.080(0.167, 0.013–2.661)
 ≥65 43 0.074(0.115, 0.012–0.517)
Grade 0.013*
 “High”–“middle” 71 0.068(0.119,0.012-0.932)
 “Middle-low”–“low” 63 0.108(0.197,0.013-2.661)
 Censoring 8 0.053(0.071,0.022-0.175)
Histotype 0.001*
 Squamous 77 0.067(0.116, 0.012–1.367)
 Adenocarcinoma 58 0.125(0.203, 0.013–2.661)
 Others 3 0.084(0.096, 0.081–0.125)
 SCLC 4 0.108(0.106,0.069-0.139)
Lymph node metastasis 0.733
 0 69 0.092(0.161, 0.012–1.367)
 1 21 0.067(0.113, 0.013–0.408)
 2–3 26 0.073(0.187, 0.016–2.661)
 4–24 24 0.086(0.120, 0.020–0.517)
 Censoring 2 0.100(0.100, 0.078–0.123)
Stage 0.580
 I–II 96 0.082(0.172, 0.012–2.661)
 III–IV 46 0.079(0.106, 0.020–0.517)
Family history 0.404
 Yes 25 0.070(0.115, 0.012–0.666)
 No 105 0.083(0.167, 0.013–2.661)
 Censoring 12 0.070(0.085, 0.040–0.172)
Smoking state 0.476
 Yes 100 0.083(0.149,0.012-2.661)
 No 31 0.080(0.180, 0.019–1.367)
 Censoring 11 0.072(0.088, 0.040–0.172)
Drinking state 0.216
 Yes 73 0.068(0.164, 0.013–2.661)
 No 58 0.090(0.146, 0.012–1.367)
 Censoring 11 0.072(0.088, 0.040–0.172)

*A p value ≤0.05 was considered statistically significant

Reverse transcription PCR

We extracted total RNA in tissues with Trizol kit ((Invitrogen, USA). The quality and concentration of RNA were evaluated by spectrophotometer. RT-PCR was conducted with One Step SYBR® Ex Taq™ qRT-PCR Kit (Takara, Japanese). The RT-PCR reaction was conducted in a 25-μl volume, containing TaKaRa Ex Taq HS (5 U/μl), 0.5 μl; PCR Forward Primer (10 μM), 0.5 μl; RTase Enzyme Mix, 0.5 μl; total RNA, 2 μl; PCR Reverse Primer (10 μM), 0.5 μl; RNase Free dH2O, 8.5 μl; 2 × One Step SYBR® RT-PCR Buffer, 12.5 μl. Amplification reactions were carried out as follows: stage 1: reverse transcription hold: 42 °C for 5 min, 95 °C for 10 s; stage 2: PCR reaction repeat: 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s, 60 °C for 20 s; stage 3: melt curve. The amplification reactions of the GAPDH were performed in the same tube. The GenBank sequences were used to design CDH4 and GAPDH primer sets. CDH4 reverse primer, 5′-GAAGACCAGCAGGGAGTCATAG-3′, CDH4 forward primer, 5′-CACCAAAAACAACGTCTACGAG-3′; GAPDH reverse primer, 5′-GAAGATGGTGATGGGATTTC-3′, GAPDH forward primer, 5′-GAAGGTGAAGGTCGGAGTC′. The ABI step-one plus performed the quantitative real-time PCR testing. Ct value was calculated with SDS2.1 software. GAPDH was used as a reference gene, when detected the relative expression of CDH4 mRNA. We used the 2−△△Ct method to calculate the relative quantity (RQ) value.

Statistical analysis

The obtained results were not normal distribution value (P < 0.05), analyzed by the Komlogorov-Smirnov test. So, analyses of the CDH4 mRNA relative value between the different groups were carried out by the Kruskall–Wallis test. The correlation between relative CDH4 mRNA value and clinical characteristics was estimated with the Spearman test. SPSS17.0 software was used for all statistical analyses. Bilateral test P < 0.05 was considered to have statistical significance.

Results

Correlation of CDH4 mRNA expression with clinical parameters of lung cancer patients

No correlation was identified between CDH4 mRNA expression and gender, age, lymphnode metastasis, TNM stage, family history, smoking state, drinking state (P > 0.05), but grade and histotype (P < 0.05) (Table 1). CDH4 mRNA expressed higher in “middle-low”–“low” grade compared with “high”–“middle” grade. In adenocarcinoma, SCLC, other histotypes, and squamous lung cancer, the CDH4 mRNA expression was dropped off.

CDH4 mRNA expression in lung cancer tissues and normal tissues

CDH4 mRNA relative value was widely distributed among these tested patients. In the group of tumor tissues, the CDH4 mRNA relative value ranged between 0.01 and 2.66 (median 0.08), whereas in the groups of normal tissues, it ranged between 0.03 and 3.01 (median 0.26). The relative value of CDH4 mRNA in lung cancer tumor tissues (mean 0.15) was lower than those of normal tissues (mean 0.32, P < 0.05) (Table 2).

Table 2.

The nonparametric tests of CDH4 mRNA expression in lung tumor tissues

Median (mean, range) P value
Normal 0.26(0.32, 0.03–3.01) <0.001
Cancer 0.08(0.15, 0.01–2.66)

Discussion

In our research, we first conducted RT-PCR examining CDH4 mRNA expression in 142 paired cases of lung cancer tissues and noncancerous tissues. We found that CDH4 mRNA expression was not associated with gender, age, lymph node metastasis, TNM stage, family history, smoking state, drinking state, but histotype and grade. CDH4 mRNA was expressed higher in “middle-low”–“low” grade compared with “high”–“middle” grade. In adenocarcinoma, SCLC, other histotypes, and squamous lung cancer, the CDH4 mRNA expression was dropped off. It suggested that CDH4 might play an important role in tissue differentiation. This was consisted with the precious studies [1517]. In Duguay et al.s’ experiment, the expression levels of cadherins were different in fibroblasts. It suggested that we could sort cell by different levels of cadherins cell surface expression as well as subtype [15]. What is the most, we found that CDH4 mRNA expression was significantly downregulated in lung tumors compared with normal tissues. In some cancers, for example, leiomyoma and ovarian carcinoma, CDH4 was treated as proto-oncogene, CDH4 gene expression was upregulated [18]. However, in some other cancers, such as nasopharyngeal carcinoma, gastric cancer, and colorectal cancer, CDH4 acted as anti-oncogene, CDH4 gene expression was downregulated[11, 12]. In lung cancer, our study suggested that CDH4 might serve as tumor surpressor gene, though more research need to be conducted.

Conclusions

In conclusion, our study first reported that the expression levels of CDH4 mRNA were decreased in the lung cancer tissues. CDH4 might be a tumor suppressor gene in lung cancer. But further studies will be necessary to confirm this result.

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

This work was supported by the Provincial Ministry Foundation (Grant No. WKJ2011-2-015), the Province of Important Technology and Science (No. 2011C13039-1), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 81172081).

Availability of data and materials

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article (lines 1–18, page 7) and its additional file.

Authors’ contributions

ZL conducted the experiment, acquired the data, enrolled the patients, and drafted the manuscript. LY and DS analyzed and interpreted the data, prepared all the figures, and edited all the tables. GY modified the article. WM designed and supervised the study. All authors reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The present study was carried out in accordance with the ethical standards of Helsinki Declaration II and approved by the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital Ethics Committee. Informed consents were provided for all patients before surgery.

Abbreviations

CDH4

Cadherin 4

GAPDH

Reduced glyceraldehyde-phosphate dehydrogenase

IASLC

International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer

RT-PCR

Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction

TSG

Tumor suppressor gene

Contributor Information

Zhupeng Li, Email: lizhupeng1027@163.com.

Dan Su, Email: sdan@zjcc.org.cn.

Lisha Ying, Email: ilonas@126.com.

Guangmao Yu, Email: sxygmys@126.com.

Weimin Mao, Phone: +1086-571-88122388, Email: mwm1218@126.com.

References

  • 1.Jemal A, et al. Cancer statistics, 2010. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60(5):277–300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61(2):69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kimman M, et al. The burden of cancer in member countries of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(2):411–20. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2012.13.2.411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goodsell DS. The molecular perspective: cadherin. Stem Cells. 2002;20(6):583–4. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.20-6-583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Conacci-Sorrell M, Zhurinsky J, Ben-Ze’ev A. The cadherin-catenin adhesion system in signaling and cancer. J Clin Invest. 2002;109(8):987–91. doi: 10.1172/JCI0215429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Rosenberg P, et al. A potential role of R-cadherin in striated muscle formation. Dev Biol. 1997;187(1):55–70. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1997.8602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dahl U, et al. Genetic dissection of cadherin function during nephrogenesis. Mol Cell Biol. 2002;22(5):1474–87. doi: 10.1128/MCB.22.5.1474-1487.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sjodin A, Dahl U, Semb H. Mouse R-cadherin: expression during the organogenesis of pancreas and gastrointestinal tract. Exp Cell Res. 1995;221(2):413–25. doi: 10.1006/excr.1995.1392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kools P, Vanhalst K, Van Roy F. Assignment of cadherin-4 (R-cadherin, CDH4) to human chromosome band 20q13.3. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1999;86(1):26–7. doi: 10.1159/000015423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bonacci TM, et al. Small GTPase Rho regulates R-cadherin through Dia1/profilin-1. Cell Signal. 2012;24(11):2102–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.07.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Du C, et al. CDH4 as a novel putative tumor suppressor gene epigenetically silenced by promoter hypermethylation in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2011;309(1):54–61. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.05.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Miotto E, et al. Frequent aberrant methylation of the CDH4 gene promoter in human colorectal and gastric cancer. Cancer Res. 2004;64(22):8156–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Travis WD, et al. International association for the study of lung cancer/american thoracic society/european respiratory society international multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6(2):244–85. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e318206a221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Vallieres E, et al. The IASLC Lung Cancer Staging Project: proposals regarding the relevance of TNM in the pathologic staging of small cell lung cancer in the forthcoming (seventh) edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4(9):1049–59. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181b27799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Duguay D, Foty RA, Steinberg MS. Cadherin-mediated cell adhesion and tissue segregation: qualitative and quantitative determinants. Dev Biol. 2003;253(2):309–23. doi: 10.1016/S0012-1606(02)00016-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Foty RA, Steinberg MS. The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation. Dev Biol. 2005;278(1):255–63. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Larue L, et al. A role for cadherins in tissue formation. Development. 1996;122(10):3185–94. doi: 10.1242/dev.122.10.3185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kucharczak J, et al. R-cadherin expression inhibits myogenesis and induces myoblast transformation via Rac1 GTPase. Cancer Res. 2008;68(16):6559–68. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-0196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The dataset supporting the conclusions of this article is included within the article (lines 1–18, page 7) and its additional file.


Articles from World Journal of Surgical Oncology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES