Skip to main content
BMC Nephrology logoLink to BMC Nephrology
. 2017 Jan 17;18:24. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0444-6

Renal function in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease receiving intravenous ferric carboxymaltose: an analysis of the randomized FIND-CKD trial

Iain C Macdougall 1,, Andreas H Bock 2, Fernando Carrera 3, Kai-Uwe Eckardt 4, Carlo Gaillard 5, David Van Wyck 6, Yvonne Meier 7, Sylvain Larroque 7, Simon D Roger 8; on behalf of the FIND-CKD Study investigators
PMCID: PMC5240256  PMID: 28095881

Abstract

Background

Preclinical studies demonstrate renal proximal tubular injury after administration of some intravenous iron preparations but clinical data on renal effects of intravenous iron are sparse.

Methods

FIND-CKD was a 56-week, randomized, open-label, multicenter study in which patients with non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (ND-CKD), anemia and iron deficiency without erythropoiesis-stimulating agent therapy received intravenous ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), targeting either higher (400–600 μg/L) or lower (100–200 μg/L) ferritin values, or oral iron.

Results

Mean (SD) eGFR at baseline was 34.9 (11.3), 32.8 (10.8) and 34.2 (12.3) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the high ferritin FCM (n = 97), low ferritin FCM (n = 89) and oral iron (n = 167) groups, respectively. Corresponding values at month 12 were 35.6 (13.8), 32.1 (12.7) and 33.4 (14.5) mL/min/1.73 m2. The pre-specified endpoint of mean (SE) change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 was +0.7 (0.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 with high ferritin FCM (p = 0.15 versus oral iron), -0.9 (0.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 with low ferritin FCM (p = 0.99 versus oral iron) and -0.9 (0.7) mL/min/1.73 m2 with oral iron. No significant association was detected between quartiles of FCM dose, change in ferritin or change in TSAT versus change in eGFR. Dialysis initiation was similar between groups. Renal adverse events were rare, with no indication of between-group differences.

Conclusion

Intravenous FCM at doses that maintained ferritin levels of 100–200 μg/L or 400–600 μg/L did not negatively impact renal function (eGFR) in patients with ND-CKD over 12 months versus oral iron, and eGFR remained stable. These findings show no evidence of renal toxicity following intravenous FCM over a 1-year period.

Trial registrations

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00994318 (first registration 12 October 2009).

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12882-017-0444-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Keywords: Chronic kidney disease, Ferinject, Ferric carboxymaltose, eGFR, Intravenous, Renal function

Background

The use of iron therapy to manage renal anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has increased significantly in recent years [1], partly in response to concerns about the safety of erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) therapies [2, 3]. Randomized trials have shown intravenous (IV) iron therapy to be more effective than oral iron in terms of replenishing depleted iron stores and improving anemia in patients on dialysis [46]. In non-dialysis dependent CKD (ND-CKD), trials have confirmed the benefits of IV versus oral iron therapy but have typically been no longer than 8 weeks in duration [711]. Recently, the randomized 56-week FIND-CKD study compared IV ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) versus oral iron in patients with ND-CKD, anemia, and iron deficiency not receiving ESA therapy [12]. Intravenous FCM targeting a ferritin level of 400–600 μg/L delayed and/or reduced the need for other anemia management (including ESAs) significantly at 1 year compared to patients receiving oral iron, and the hematopoietic response was more rapid.

However, concerns exist about the potential renal toxicity of IV iron therapy [13]. Rapid release of large amounts of iron into the bloodstream could generate ‘free’ iron in the circulation (non-transferrin bound iron, NTBI) which may promote oxidative stress [14, 15]. Some IV iron complexes such as ferric gluconate contain weakly-bound iron that is released readily and quickly [15]. In contrast, animal models have shown, that oxidative stress does not increase with more stable IV iron complexes such as FCM [1618]. Clinical evidence relating to a possible effect of IV iron therapy on renal function is limited. Single-dose and short-term (5-week) studies from one center have indicated that iron sucrose may induce renal injury mediated by oxidative stress and inflammation [1923]. However, the recently published REVOKE study, which randomized patients with ND-CKD to IV iron sucrose or oral iron, showed neither a difference in renal function decline (based on GFR measured by iothalamate clearance) nor in proteinuria during follow-up lasting up to 2 years [24]. Confirmatory data are clearly important.

The FIND-CKD trial included protocol-specified monitoring of renal function in over 600 patients with ND-CKD, based on estimated GFR (eGFR), throughout the 1-year study [25]. Data were analyzed to compare renal outcomes in patients randomized to IV FCM using two different dosing regimens aiming for different target ferritin concentrations, with those in patients receiving oral iron.

Methods

Study design

FIND-CKD was a 56-week, open-label, multicenter, prospective, randomized, three-arm study undertaken during December 2009 to January 2012 at 193 nephrology centers in 20 countries (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00994318) [25].

Patient population

Adult patients (≥18 years) with ND-CKD were eligible for inclusion if (a) at least one Hb level was between 9 and 11 g/dL within 4 weeks of randomization, (b) any ferritin level was <100 μg/L, or <200 μg/L with transferrin saturation (TSAT) <20%, within 4 weeks of randomization, (c) eGFR was ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (four-variable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD-4] equation [26]), the prior rate of eGFR loss was ≤12 mL/min/1.73 m2/year and predicted eGFR at 12 months based on previous decline was ≥15 mL/min/1.73 m2, and (d) no ESA had been administered within 4 months prior to randomization. Estimates of prior eGFR loss were based on at least two values over at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, and preferably three values over at least 3 months.

Key exclusion criteria included current dialysis, anticipated dialysis or transplantation during the study, anemia due to reasons other than iron deficiency, a documented history of discontinuing oral iron products due to significant gastrointestinal distress, known active infection, C-reactive protein >20 mg/L, overt bleeding, active malignancy, chronic liver disease, concomitant New York Heart Association Class IV heart failure and poorly controlled hypertension (>160 mmHg systolic pressure or >100 mmHg diastolic pressure).

Randomization and intervention

Eligible patients were randomized centrally via a central interactive voice-response system in a 1:1:2 ratio to high ferritin FCM, low ferritin FCM or oral iron. The dose of FCM (Ferinject®, Vifor International, St Gallen, Switzerland) in the high ferritin and low ferritin FCM groups was adjusted to target a ferritin level of 400−600 μg/L and 100–200 μg/L, respectively. An initial single dose was administered on day 0: 1000 mg iron as FCM in the high ferritin FCM group (500 mg iron on days 0 and 7 in patients weighing ≤66 kg) and 200 mg iron as FCM in the low ferritin FCM group if ferritin was <100 μg/L. During weeks 4 to 48, FCM was administered every 4 weeks in the high ferritin FCM group at a dose of 500 mg iron if ferritin was in the range 200 to <400 μg/L, and at a dose of 1000 mg iron if ferritin was <200 μg/L, and in the low ferritin FCM group at a dose of 200 mg iron if ferritin was <100 μg/L. In both groups, dosing was withheld if TSAT was ≥40%. Oral iron therapy consisted of commercially-available ferrous sulfate at a dose of 304 mg (100 mg of iron) twice daily to week 52. During the first 8 weeks after randomization, patients were not to receive ESAs, blood transfusion or any anemia therapy other than study drug unless there was an absolute requirement, after which ESAs and other therapies were permitted according to local practice if the Hb was <10 g/dL.

Assessment of renal function

Renal function was assessed by eGFR, with values calculated locally and provided by the study sites using the MDRD-4 formula [26]. Estimated GFR was recorded at baseline and at every 3 months throughout the 12-month study period. The change in eGFR from baseline to the end of the study was a pre-specified secondary endpoint of the trial. GFR was estimated by the MDRD-4 formula [26]. As a post hoc sensitivity analysis, GFR was also estimated by the creatinine-based Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula [27]. CKD-EPI values were calculated centrally using locally-measured serum creatinine levels. The percentage of patients starting dialysis was a further pre-specified secondary endpoint.

Statistical analysis

All analyses of renal function were exploratory. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) modeling was used to compare the change in eGFR values from baseline to month 12 between groups based on least square (LS) mean values using a repeated fixed effects model with treatment, visit and pooled country as factors, baseline eGFR as covariate, and treatment-by-visit as an interaction. Change in eGFR at month 12 was summarized in subpopulations of patients according to age (≤ or > median), gender, body mass index (BMI, ≤ or > median), baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressure (≤ or > median), mean arterial pressure and history of diabetes at baseline. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis including demographics and baseline characteristics (age, gender, BMI, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, diabetic status, prior use of angiotensin converting enzyme [ACE] inhibitor and angiotensin II receptor blocker [ARB] medications) was performed to check for potential confounding effect and best impacting factor on the analysis of treatment effect.

For the proportion of patients requiring dialysis, logistic regression analyses were performed and odds ratios (ORs) were used to compare treatment groups.

Post hoc, absolute eGFR values and the change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 were analyzed according to (i) quartiles of total FCM dose throughout the 12-month study using pooled data from both FCM treatment groups (ii) quartiles of change in ferritin level from baseline to month 12 across all patients (iii) quartiles of change in TSAT level from baseline to month 12 across all patients.

Renal function was analyzed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of randomized treatment and who attended at least one post-baseline visit. Patients were excluded from the analysis of change in eGFR to month 12 if (a) they reached the primary event before month 12 (i.e. received alternative management for anemia) or (b) the randomized treatment regimen was permanently discontinued before month 12. Within this cohort, calculations for the change in eGFR, ferritin and TSAT from baseline to month 12 were based on the subpopulations of patients who had values available at both time points.

Adverse events were analyzed in the safety population, comprising all patients who received at least one dose of randomized study drug.

All statistical analyses were performed using SAS Version 9.3 (SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT, Cary, NC, USA).

Results

Study population

In total, 613 patients were randomized and included in the ITT population. Estimated GFR was measured at baseline in all patients. Of 519 patients who completed the study, 166 patients had started another anemia management and/or stopped the randomized study regimen before month 12, and were excluded from analyses. Thus eGFR values at both baseline and month 12 were analyzed in 353 patients (97, 89 and 167 patients in the high ferritin FCM group, the low ferritin FCM group and the oral iron group, respectively). These patients were included in the current analysis. The demographics and other characteristics of this subpopulation (Table 1) did not differ from the total ITT population (Additional file 1: Table S1) and were comparable between groups.

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics for patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12

High ferritin FCM (n = 97) Low ferritin FCM (n = 89) Oral iron
(n = 167)
Age, years 69.3 (12.9) 69.0 (12.1) 69.6 (12.7)
Female gender, n (%) 61 ((62.9) 56 (62.9) 106 (63.5)
White race, n (%) 93 (95.9) 83 (93.3) 159 (95.2)
Body mass index, kg/m2 30.5 (6.8) 30.0 (5.3) 29.4 (5.4)
History of diabetes, n (%) 61 (62.9) 59 (66.3) 106 (63.5)
Endogenous erythropoietin, mIU/mL 29.4 (24.6) 29.6 (27.4) 26.3 (20.9)
Hb, g/dL 10.4 (0.7) 10.5 (0.9) 10.7 (0.6)
Ferritin, μg/L 54.2 94.9) 45.8 (44.3) 52.4 (39.9)
TSAT, % 16.3 (20.2) 14.9 (7.5) 14.8 (7.0)
C-reactive protein, mg/L 7.4 (13.4) 5.7 (5.9) 5.3 (6.5)
ACE inhibitor therapy prior to study entry, n (%)a 32 (33.0) 37 (41.6) 69 (41.3)
Angiotensin II antagonist therapy prior to study entry, n (%)b 41 (42.3) 33 (37.1) 77 (46.1)

Continuous variables are shown as mean (SD)

ACE angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, FCM ferric carboxymaltose, Hb hemoglobin, TSAT transferrin saturation

aIncludes patients receiving ACE inhibitor combinations

bIncludes patients receiving angiotensin II antagonist combinations

Baseline eGFR in this subpopulation of patients was similar between treatment groups (Table 2) and did not show any relevant differences to baseline values in the total ITT population (mean [SD] 32.8 [11.7] mL/min/1.73 m2, 31.5 [10.7] mL/min/1.73m2and 32.3 [11.6] mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively, in the high ferritin FCM, low ferritin FCM and oral iron groups).

Table 2.

Estimated GFR (eGFR) for patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12

High ferritin FCM (n = 97) Low ferritin FCM (n = 89) Oral iron (n = 167)
eGFR at baseline (MDRD), mL/min/1.73 m2
 Mean (SD) 34.9 (11.3) 32.8 (10.8) 34.2 (12.3)
 ≥ 60, n (%) 1 (1.0) 1 (1.1) 3 (1.8)
 30 to <60, n (%) 62 (63.9) 51 (57.3) 101 (60.5)
 15 to <30, n (%) 34 (35.1) 37 (41.6) 60 (35.9)
 < 15, n (%) 0 0 3 (1.8)
eGFR at month 12 (MDRD), mL/min/1.73 m2
 Mean (SD) 35.6 (13.8) 32.1 (12.7) 33.4 (14.5)
 ≥ 60, n (%) 7 (7.2) 4 (4.5) 7 (4.2)
 30 to <60, n (%) 54 (55.7) 40 (44.9) 83 (49.7)
 15 to <30, n (%) 32 (33.0) 39 (43.8) 65 (38.9)
 < 15, n (%) 4 (4.1) 6 (6.7) 12 (7.2)
Change from baseline to month 12, LS mean (SE) (MDRD), mL/min/1.73 m2 0.7 (0.9) -0.9 (0.9) -0.9 (0.7)
p value for change vs oral irona 0.15 0.99 Reference
Relative change from baseline to month 12, LS mean (SE) (MDRD), % 3.1 (2.6) -2.4 (2.7) -2.2 (2.0)
p value for change vs oral irona 0.098 0.95 Reference
eGFR (CKD-EPI) mL/min/1.73 m2 n = 82 n = 68 n = 137
 Mean (SD) at baseline 33.5 (11.9) 32.0 (11.8) 32.5 (13.4)
 Mean (SD) at month 12 34.8 (13.1) 31.1 (13.5) 31.0 (14.8)
 Change, LS mean (SE), mL/min/1.73 m2 1.3 (1.0) -1.2 (1.0) -1.7 (0.7)
p value for change vs oral irona 0.012 0.68 Reference

eGFR was estimated by the MDRD-4 equation [27] at the local laboratory

CI confidence interval, CKD-EPI Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI), eGFR estimated GFR, FCM ferric carboxymaltose, LS least squares, MDRD Modification of Diet in Renal Disease, SE standard error

aAnalysis of covariance analysis based on least square mean values, using repeated measures

Four patients in this cohort of 353 patients were included against protocol with baseline eGFR >60 mL/min/1.73 m2: one high ferritin FCM patient (63 mL/min/1.73 m2), one low ferritin FCM patient (61 mL/min/1.73 m2) and two patients in the oral iron group (66 and 77 mL/min/1.73 m2). Three patients in the oral iron group contravened the exclusion criterion that eGFR loss was to be no more than 12 mL/min/1.73 m2 per year.

Change in renal function

Values for eGFR showed no change in any of the three treatment groups throughout the 12-month study (Fig. 1). At month 12, mean (SD) eGFR was 35.6 (13.8) mL/min/1.73 m2, 32.1 (12.7) mL/min/1.73 m2 and 33.4 (14.5) mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively. The pre-defined endpoint of change from baseline to month 12 was +0.7 (0.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the high ferritin FCM group, -0.9 (0.9) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the low ferritin FCM group and -0.9 (0.7) mL/min/1.73 m2 in the oral iron group (least square [LS] mean [SE] values). There were no significant differences in the change from baseline to month 12 for either FCM group versus oral iron (p = 0.15 for the high ferritin group, p = 0.99 for the low ferritin FCM group). The mean (SE) percentage change in eGFR was 3.1 (2.6)% in the high ferritin FCM group (p = 0.098 versus oral iron) (Table 2).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Estimated GFR to month 12 according to treatment group in patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12. Values are shown as mean (SD). FCM, ferric carboxymaltose; eGFR, estimated GFR

As a sensitivity analysis, eGFR was also calculated using the CKD-EPI formula. Serum creatinine values were provided for central calculation of CKD-EPI values in 82, 68 and 137 patients in the high ferritin FCM, low ferritin FCM and oral iron groups, respectively. Based on the CKD-EPI formula, there was a significant increase in eGFR from baseline to month 12 for the high ferritin FCM group versus oral iron (p = 0.012) (Table 2).

When the change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 was assessed in subpopulations of patients according to age, gender, BMI, presence/absence of diabetes, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure, no apparent influence of treatment group was observed (Additional file 2: Table 2).

Change in renal function according to FCM dose

The mean (SD) total dose of FCM 2793 (932) mg iron in the high ferritin group and 1205 (626) mg iron in the low ferritin group among patients with eGFR data available at baseline and month 12 (excluding patients who started another anemia therapy or permanently discontinued study treatment.) The change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 showed no association with total FCM dose when plotted individually for patients in either the high ferritin FCM or low ferritin FCM groups (Additional file 3: Figure S1). Using pooled data from both FCM groups, the change in eGFR to month 12 was analyzed by quartiles of total FCM dose (Fig. 2a).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Absolute estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 according to quartiles of (a) total ferric carboxymaltose (FCM) dose to month 12 in patients randomized to high ferritin FCM or low ferritin FCM (b) change in ferritin from baseline to month 12 across all treatment groups and (c) change in transferrin saturation (TSAT) from baseline at month 12 across all treatment groups. Data are shown for patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12. Change in eGFR is shown as least squares (LS) mean values. MDRD, Modification of Diet in Renal Disease

The multivariate model indicated that age (p = 0.007), systolic blood pressure (p = 0.004), diabetic status (p = 0.058) and prior use of ACE inhibitor therapy (p = 0.054) exerted an impact on the change in eGFR (MDRD) to month 12. When these factors were added into the repeated measures model over time, the least square mean values for treatment effect were similar for the high ferritin FCM, low ferritin FCM and oral iron groups (0.7, -0.8 and -0.9 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively; p = 0.14 for high ferritin FCM versus oral iron, p = 0.92 for low ferritin FCM versus oral iron). When repeated using the CKD-EPI equation to estimate GFR, only age (p = 0.042) and systolic blood pressure (p = 0.004) were found to influence the change in eGFR to month 12. Inclusion of these two factors in the repeated measure model produced LS mean values of 1.3 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the high ferritin FCM group, -1.1 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the low ferritin FCM group and -1.7 mL/min/1.73 m2 for the oral iron group (p = 0.010 versus high ferritin FCM, p = 0.613 versus low ferritin FCM).

Change in renal function according to iron status

Mean ferritin levels were within the pre-specified target ranges from week 12 to the end of the study in both of the FCM treatment arms (Additional file 4: Figure S2a). At month 12, the mean (SD) change in ferritin from baseline was 455 (116), 81 (59) and 139 (111) μg/L in the high ferritin FCM, low ferritin FCM and oral iron groups, respectively, among patients with eGFR available at baseline and month 12. The change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 showed no significant association with the change in ferritin over the same period when analyzed by quartiles (Fig. 2b).

TSAT levels to month 12 are shown in Additional file 4: Figure S2b. As observed for ferritin levels, the change in eGFR showed no significant differences between quartiles of change in TSAT (Fig. 2c).

Renal events

In total, 16/613 patients in the ITT population (2.6%) progressed to dialysis by month 12 (5 high ferritin FCM, 1 low ferritin FCM, 10 oral iron). There was no significant difference in the risk of dialysis for either FCM group versus oral iron: OR 1.01 (95% CI 0.34, 3.00; p = 0.99) for the high ferritin FCM group and OR 0.20 (95% CI 0.03, 1.56; p = 0.12) for the low ferritin group. No patient underwent renal transplantation.

Rates of adverse events and serious adverse events related to renal function were low with no indication of clinically relevant differences between treatment groups (Additional file 5: Table S3).

Discussion

Results from the randomized FIND-CKD trial show that compared to oral iron, administration of IV FCM in doses that maintain ferritin levels of 100–200 μg/L or 400–600 μg/L does not negatively impact renal function, as determined by eGFR, in patients with ND-CKD after 1 year. Mean eGFR remained stable during the study in both the FCM treatment groups, and the change in eGFR to 1 year did not differ from that seen in patients treated with oral iron therapy, either on univariate or multivariate analysis. These findings, calculated using the pre-specified MDRD-4 formula, were confirmed when GFR was estimated by the more recently developed CKD-EPI formula [28]. Indeed, if anything, there was an increase in eGFR in the patients in the high-ferritin FCM arm compared to oral iron using the CKD-EPI formula (p = 0.012) which was confirmed on multivariate analysis. There was no difference between groups in the rate of progression to dialysis and no evidence of increased renal adverse events in either FCM treatment group.

Clinical studies measuring the short- or long-term effect of IV iron complexes on renal function versus controls are relatively scarce. Van Wyck et al. randomized 188 patients with ND-CKD to a total dose of 1000 mg iron as iron sucrose (infused over 3.5–4 h) or oral iron sulfate [10]. At the end of the 6-week study, there was a mean decrease in eGFR in both treatment arms, but the decrease was smaller in the iron sucrose arm (-1.45 mL/min/1.73 m2 versus -4.40 mL/min/1.73 m2 in the oral iron arm; p = 0.01). McMahon et al. undertook a randomized trial of iron sucrose (100–200 mg every two months) or oral iron sulfate for 12 months in patients with ND-CKD who were non-anemic (Hb ≥11 g/dL) and iron replete (ferritin >300 μg/L and TSAT >25%) at baseline, and has described a similar change in eGFR in both treatment groups over the study period [29]. This similarity was observed despite elevated iron indices in the IV iron group at month 12 (mean ferritin 363 μg/L versus 125 μg/L in the oral iron group; TSAT 30% versus 21%). However, the study analyzed only 85 patients, such that a relatively small effect on renal function may have remained undetected, and the study protocol specified only modest doses of iron supplementation in both the IV and oral iron groups (the actual amount administered was not specified). Lastly, a recent randomized trial of IV iron sucrose versus oral iron showed no change in measured GFR over 2 years’ follow-up between the two arms of the study [24]. Other randomized trials comparing IV iron versus oral iron have not reported renal function, but there was no evidence of a higher rate of renal adverse events in the IV iron groups versus patients receiving oral iron therapy [79, 11].

Regarding a possible effect of IV iron on proteinuria, in a blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over study of eight patients with ND-CKD, Leehey et al. assessed the effect of a single dose of ferric gluconate at a dose of 125 mg iron infused over one hour, or 250 mg iron over two hours [21]. They observed no evidence of acute renal injury, as assessed by albuminuria, proteinuria or enzymuria, although plasma levels of the oxidative stress marker malondialdehyde (MDA) increased with both doses. Another randomized trial, by Agarwal and colleagues, administered a single dose of 100 mg iron sucrose to 20 subjects with CKD stage 3 or 4, and also found an increase in MDA versus controls, accompanied by transient proteinuria and enzymuria which resolved within 24 h [22]. Similar analyses have been performed in repeated dose studies. In a multicenter, randomized trial, 62 patients with ND-CKD and iron deficiency anemia received a weekly dose of either iron sucrose or ferric gluconate (100 mg) for 5 weeks [19]. Basal levels of proteinuria were similar, but increased post-dosing, with a greater increase with iron sucrose than ferric gluconate [19]. This was consistent with results from an earlier single-dose study from the same group which showed that a single dose of iron sucrose (100 mg) provoked a significantly higher urinary protein to creatinine ratio than ferric gluconate [20]. The difference between iron sucrose and ferric gluconate is somewhat unexpected, since the latter is considered to be less stable. Other authors have reported that rapid infusion (5 min) of iron dextran or iron sucrose results in generation of reactive oxygen species [15], whereas a study of 20 iron-replete dialysis patients found that slow infusion (60 min) of these preparations did not affect biomarkers of oxidative stress or inflammation [30] (neither study measured renal function). Finally, in the prospective REVOKE trial [24], which was designed to detect renal toxicity of IV iron, proteinuria was similar in the IV iron sucrose and oral iron arms.

In the current study, FCM-treated patients received an initial single dose of up to 1000 mg iron in the high ferritin group, or 200 mg in the low ferritin group (each infused over 15 min), with mean total doses of ~2800 mg iron and ~1200 mg iron, respectively, among patients with eGFR data available at baseline and month 12. A post hoc analysis indicated that within this range, there was no association between quartiles of FCM dose and the change in eGFR during the 12 months after the start of FCM therapy. Moreover, neither absolute levels of ferritin (a marker for iron stores) nor TSAT (a marker for iron availability) at month 12, nor the change in ferritin or TSAT during the study, showed an association with change in eGFR. Thus, the significant increase in ferritin levels achieved in the cohort of patients randomized to high ferritin FCM was not associated with a change in renal function.

Conclusions

The main limitation of these findings is the 1-year duration of the FIND-CKD trial which, while longer than most previous comparative studies of IV versus oral iron [711, 24], may not be adequate to detect a long-term effect on renal function. Within the full study cohort, we restricted the analysis to the patients who remained on the randomized study drug for the full 12-month study; any patient in whom another anemia therapy was introduced or who discontinued the study prematurely was excluded. While this reduced the population size, we believe that this was the most rigorous analytical approach. No patient discontinued the study due to decreasing renal function so bias due to selective discontinuation can be ruled out. Moreover, baseline and month 12 values for eGFR (and the extent of change from baseline to month 12) were similar in each treatment group to those seen in the full ITT population [25]. A post hoc repeated measured modeling calculation showed that the population analyzed here (n = 353) had a 15 and 18% power, respectively, to detect a difference of 1.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 in the change in eGFR between the high and low ferritin FCM groups, and between the high ferritin FCM and oral iron groups (40 and 49%, respectively, to detect a difference of 2 mL/min/1.73 m2). The study used eGFR as the indicator of renal function rather than a method to measure GFR. Furthermore, GFR estimates were based on locally determined serum creatinine values, so that variability between methods at different sites cannot be excluded. It is unlikely, however, that such variations would have obscured differences between treatment groups, since each patient served as their own control at baseline using the same assay. Another limitation is that urinary protein excretion and biomarkers of renal tubular toxicity were not recorded. Also, patients previously showing a rapidly progressive loss of renal function at screening were excluded from the study. Indeed, it is remarkable that the annual loss of eGFR was no more than 1.6 mL/min/1.732 in any group. Other eligibility criteria for the study may have contributed to this stability, notably exclusion of patients with previous eGFR loss >12 mL/min/1.73 m2/year but also, for example, those with poorly controlled hypertension. Moreover, approximately three-quarters of patients were receiving an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor antagonist. Lastly, in terms of the study design, the absence of a placebo arm precludes a comparison of renal function using IV iron versus no treatment and would have contributed to understanding if the observed stability of renal function was partly a trial effect.

In conclusion, results from this study indicate a lack of renal toxicity of IV iron therapy in patients with relatively stable renal function. It is important to note that these results do not necessarily apply to other IV iron preparations, due to varying molecular structures and physiochemical properties, or to patients with other characteristics (for example those receiving dialysis). Assessment of longer-term effects of IV iron, however, is required.

Acknowledgments

The FIND-CKD study was funded by Vifor Pharma, Glattbrugg, Switzerland. Medical writing supported was provided by a freelance medical writer funded by Vifor Pharma (C Dunstall). The study was designed, implemented and overseen by members of the FIND-CKD Steering Committee and a Data and Safety Monitoring Board together with representatives of the study sponsor. On-site monitoring, data collection and data management were performed by ICON Clinical Research (Dublin, Ireland). Data analysis was performed by a biostatistician in ICON with oversight and validation by the sponsor statistician (B Roubert) according to a predefined statistical analysis plan which was reviewed by an independent statistician. All authors had full access to the study data, decided to submit the report for publication, assume responsibility for the completeness and accuracy of the data, and the content and integrity of the report.

Members of the Ferinject® assessment in patients with Iron deficiency anemia and Non-Dialysis dependent Chronic Kidney Disease (FIND-CKD) study group are listed in Appendix 1.

Availability of data and materials

Data relating to the primary FIND-CKD study analysis can be obtained at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00994318?term=FIND+CKD&rank=1.All source data for the current analysis are available from the authors. Requests may be emailed to: iain.macdougall@nhs.net.

Authors’ contributions

ICM, AHB, FC, K-UE, CG, DVW and SDR contributed to the study design, recruited patients and collected data during the study. ICM developed the first draft of the manuscript, which was critically reviewed, revised and approved by the other authors. YM provided clinical support. SL was the study statistician. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

Iain C Macdougall has received speaker’s fees, honoraria and consultancy fees from several manufacturers of ESAs and IV iron, including Affymax, AMAG, Amgen, Ortho Biotech, Pharmacosmos, Hoffmann-La Roche, Takeda and Vifor Pharma. Andreas H. Bock has received speaker’s honoraria and consultancy fees from Amgen, Hoffmann-La Roche and Vifor Pharma. Fernando Carrera has no conflicts of interest to declare. Kai-Uwe Eckardt has received speaker’s fees and/or consultancy fees from manufacturers of ESAs and IV iron, including Affymax, Amgen, Bayer, Johnson & Johnson, Hoffmann-La Roche and Vifor Pharma. Carlo Gaillard has received speaker’s fees, honoraria and consultancy fees from manufacturers of ESAs and IV iron, including Amgen, Pharmacosmos, Hoffmann-La Roche, Takeda and Vifor Pharma. David Van Wyck is an employee and stockholder of DaVita Healthcare Partners, Inc. Yvonne Meier and Sylvain Larroque are employees of Vifor Pharma. Simon D Roger has received speaker’s fees, honoraria and consultancy fees from several manufacturers of ESAs and IV iron, including Amgen, Hoffmann-La Roche, Janssen-Cilag, Novartis, Sandoz, Takeda and Vifor Pharma.

Consent for publication

No individual data are presented.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was conducted according to the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and the ICH Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice. All patients provided written informed consent. The study protocol was approved at all participating sites (see Appendix 2 for a list of Ethics Committees).

Abbreviations

ACE

Angiotensin converting enzyme

ANCOVA

Analysis of covariance

ARB

Angiotensin II receptor blocker

BMI

Body mass index

CKD

Chronic kidney disease

CKD-EPI

Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration

eGFR

estimated GFR

ESA

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent

FCM

Ferric carboxymaltose

ITT

Intention-to-treat

IV

Intravenous

MDA

Malondialdehyde

MDRD

Modification of Diet in Renal Disease

ND-CKD

Non-dialysis dependent CKD

NTBI

Non-transferrin bound iron

TSAT

Transferrin saturation

Appendix 1

The FIND-CKD Investigators

Australia: Simon D Roger (Gosford), Alastair Gilles (Newcastle), Randall Faull (Adelaide), Nigel D Toussaint (Parkville), Lawrence McMahon (Box Hill), Michael Suranyi (Liverpool), David Mudge (Brisbane), Brian Hutchison (Perth), Ashley Irish (Perth), Peter Kerr (Clayton), Hemant Kulkarni (Perth and Armadale), Grahame Elder (Westmead), Margaret Jardine (Concord); Austria: Karl Lhotta (Feldkirch), Gert Mayer (Innsbruck); Belgium: Raymond Vanholder (Gent), Bart Dirk Maes (Roeselare), Pieter Evenepoel (Leuven), Frédéric Debelle (Baudour), Michel Jadoul (Brussels), Max Dratwa (Brussels); Czech Republic: Igor Macel (Zdar nad Sazavou), Milan Dunaj (Litomysl), Milan Kvapil (Praha), Petr Bucek (Frydek-Mistek), Jitka Rehorova (Brno), Ales Hruby (Slavkov u Brna), Václava Honová (Pizen), Lada Malanova (Pizen), Martin Lucak (Prague), Dalibor Lecian (Praha), Martin Jirovec (Marianske Lazne), Jiri Vlasak (Sokolov), Ivan Rychlik (Sokolov), Stanislav Surel (Brno); Denmark: Anne-Lise Kamper (Kobehavn), Ove Ostergaard (Roskilde), Gudrun K Steffensen (Frederica); France: Leila Chenine (Montpellier), Gabrial Choukroun (Amiens), Philippe Zaoui (Grenoble); Germany: Christoph Wanner (Würzburg), Wolfgang Backs (Hamburg), Uwe Kraatz (Demmin), Frank Dellanna (Düsseldorf), Klaus Busch (Dortmund), Tobias Marsen (Köln), Wolfgang Seeger (Berlin), Rainer Woitas (Bonn), Nicholas Obermueller (Frankfurt/Main), Thomas Haak (Bad Mergentheim), Stephan Lueders (Cloppenburg), Frank Pistrosch (Hoyerswerda), Eckhard Mueller (Benkastel-Kues), Peter R Mertens (Magdeburg), Werner Sutermer (Würzburg), Scott-Oliver Grebe (Wuppertal), Syrus Hafezi-Rachti (Mannheim-Käfertal), Silke Roeser (Eberswalde); Greece: Dimitrios Tsakiris (Thessaloniki), Dimitrios Memmos (Thessanloniki), Demetrios Vlachakos (Chaidari, Athens), Vassilis Vargemezis (Dragana, Alexandroupolis), Ioannis Stefanidis (Mezourlo, Larissa), Christos Syrganis (Volos), Polichronis Alivanis (Rhodes), Ioannis Papadakis (Athens), Nickolaos Papagalanis (Athens), Aimilios Andrikos (Joannina), Dimitrios Goumenos (Rios Patras), Kostas Siamopoulos (Ioannina), Charikelia Gouva (Arta), Gabriel Papadakis (Peireus), Ioannis Boletis (Athens), Myrsini Tsimnadi-Spanoudaki (Vestos), Dimitrios Stamatiades (Serres), Kyriaki Stamatelou (Athens), Spyridon Moutafis (Athens); Italy: Francesco Locatelli (Lecco), Antonio Santoro (Bologna), Francesco Quarello (Torino), Giuseppe Remuzzi (Bergamo), Salvatore Coppola (Piedmonte Matese), Rosella Ferraro Mortellaro (Dan Daniele del Friuli), Andrea Icardi (Arenzano), Giacomo Colussi (Milan), Franco Della Grotta (Anzio), Luigi Lombardi (Ctanzaro), Maurizio Gallieni (Milano), Giuseppe Villa (Pavia), Giuseppe Grandaliano (Foggia); The Netherlands: Carlo Gaillard (Amersfoort and Amsterdam), Sebastiaan Huisman (Delft), Jos Barendregt (Apeldoorn), Peter JH Smak Gregoor (Dordrecht); Norway: Cecilia Oien (Trondheim); Poland: Boleslaw Rutkowski (Gdansk), Robert Malecki (Warszawa), Michal Nowicki (Lodz), Przemyslaw Rutkowski (Starogard Gdanski), Kryzsztof Marczewski (Zamosc), Michal Mysliwiec (Bialystok), Antoni Sydor (Tarnow), Jacek Rysz (Lodz), Andrzej Rydzewski (Warszawa), Marian Klinger (Wroclaw), Rafal Wnuk (Dabrowa Gornicza), Piotr Kozminski (Mlawa), Anna Nocon (Wroclaw), Kazimierz Ciechanowski (Szczecin); Portugal: Pedro Correia (Amadora), Fernando Neves (Lisboa), José Barata (Carnaxide); Romania: Gabriel Mircescu (Bucuresti), Mihai Voiculescu (Bucuresti), Gheorghe Gluhovschi (Timisoara), Eugen Mota (Craiova); Spain: Angel Luís Martín De Francisco (Santander), Alberto Torre (Madrid), Alba Herreros (Barcelona), José Luño (Madrid), E Gruss (Alcorcón), Judith Martins (Getafe [Madrid]), Marti Vallés (Girona), Julio Pascual (Barcelona); Sweden: Peter Bárány (Stockholm); Switzerland: Andreas H Bock (Aarau), Patrice M Ambuehl (Zürich); Turkey: Sehsuvar Erturk (Ankara), Mustafa Arici (Ankara), Saime Paydas (Adnana), Zeki Soypacaci (Izmir), Taner Camsari (Izmir), Sedat Ustundag (Edirne); United Kingdom: Iain C Macdougall (London), Mark E Thomas (Birmingham), Richard J D’Souza (Exeter), Jo E Taylor (Dorchester), Nicholas R Pritchard (Cambridge), Robin Jeffery (Bradford), Stephen G Riley (Cardiff), Deepak Bhatnagar (Oldham), Sunil Bhandari (Hull), David Reaich (Middlesborough), Paul E Stevens (Canterbury), Mohsen El Kossi (Doncaster), Simon Roe (Nottingham), Brian Camilleri (Ipswich), Aimun Ahmed (Preston), Arif Khwaja (Sheffield), Barbara Thompson (Stevenage), Debasish Banerjee (London), Johann Nicholas (Wolverhampton), Alistair Hutchison (Manchester), Richard Borrows (Birmingham).

Appendix 2

Table 3.

FIND-CKD trial: Ethics Committee approvals

Country Site Nr Ethic Committee
Australia 0101 Bellberry HREC 229 Greenhill Road Dulwich SA 5O65
Australia 0102 Bellberry HREC 229 Greenhill Road Dulwich SA 5O65
Australia 0103 Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout Road
New Lambton Heights NSW 23O5
Australia 0104 Research Ethics Committee Royal Adelaide Hospital North Terrace
Adelaide SA 5OOO
Australia 0105 Human Research Ethics Committee Royal Melbourne Hospital Parkville, Victoria 3O5O
Australia 0106 Eastern Health HREC Level 2, 5 Arnold Street Box Hill, Victoria 3f28
Australia 0106 Eastern Health HREC Level 2, 5 Arnold Street Box Hill, Victoria 3f29
Australia 0107 Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout Road
New Lambton Heights NSW 23O5
Australia 0108 PAH Human Research Ethics Committee Tafe 3, Level 2, Bldg 35
Princess Alexandra Hospital Ispswich Road Woolloongabba, QLD 4fO2
Australia 9 Ballarat Health Services and St. John of God Health Care Ethics Committee
Base Hospital Drummond Street North PO Box 577 Ballarat 3353
Australia 0110 Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout Road
New Lambton Heights NSW 2305
Australia 0111 Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout Road
New Lambton Heights NSW 2306
Australia 0111 Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital HREC University of Queensland, Centre for Clinical Research, Level 4, RBWH HERSTON, QUEENSLAND AUSTRALIA 4029
Australia 0112 Sir Charles Gairdner HREC Level 2, A block Hospital Avenue Nedlands, WA 6009
Australia 0113 Royal Perth Hospital HREC Colonial House Wellington Street, WA 6000
Australia 0114 Southern Health HREC 246 Clayton Road Clayton, Victoria 3168
Australia 0115 Sir Charles Gairdner HREC Level 2, A block Hospital Avenue Nedlands, WA 6009
Australia 0117 Cairns Base Hospital Ethics Committee PO Box 902 Cairns, QLD 4870
Australia 0118 Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout Road
New Lambton Heights NSW 2305
Australia 0119 Hunter Area Research Ethics Committee John Hunter Hospital Lookout Road
New Lambton Heights NSW 2305
Australia 0120 Sir Charles Gairdner HREC Level 2, A block Hospital Avenue Nedlands, WA 6009
Austria 0202 Ethikkommission der Stadt Wien Town Thomas-Klestil-Platz 8/2 A-1030 Wien, Osterreich
Austria 0203 Ethikkommission der Stadt Wien Town Thomas-Klestil-Platz 8/2 A-1030 Wien, Osterreich
Austria 0204 Ethikkommission des Landes Vorarlberg
Rathausstrassed 15
A-6900 Bregenz
Osterreich
Austria 0205 Ethikkommission Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen Linz GmbH Fadingerstrasse 1
A-4 Linz Osterreich
Austria 0206 Ethikkommission der Medizinischen Universitat Innsbruck Innrain 43
A-6020 Innsbruck Osterreich
Austria 0207 EK des Landes Oberosterreich Landesnervenklinik Wagner-Jauregg Strasse Wagner-Jauregg Weg 15
A-4020 Linz Osterreich
Belgium 0301 Secretariaat Ethische Commissie UZ Gent Attn. Prof. Dr Matthys De Pintelaan 185
9000 Gent
Belgium 0302 H.-Hartziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen vzw Attn. Dr. Ludo Marcelis WILGENSTRAAT 2
8800 ROESELARE
Belgium 0303 Dr Van Vlem
Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Attn. Greet de Geest Moorselbaan 164 9300 Aalst
Belgium 0304 Commissie Medische Ethiek van Universitaire Ziekenhuizen K.U.Leuven Attn. Prof. Walter Van den Bogaert
Campus Gasthuisberg E330 Herestraat 49 B-3000 Leuven
Belgium 0305 Kristien Schoenmakers gang beheer en directie ZOL Campus St Jan Schiepse bos 6 3600 Genk
Belgium 0306 Hopitaux IRIS Sud-site Joseph Bracops Rue Dr Huet 79 Brussels 1070
Belgium 0307 Comité d’Ethique du Epicura Ath-Baudour Attn. Dr Frederic Debelle
136 rue Louis Caty 7331 Baudour
Belgium 0308 Commission d’Ethique Biomédicale Hospitalo- Facultaire Attn. Pr Jean-Marie Maloteaux Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc Avenue Hippocrate 55/14 B-1200 Bruxelles
Belgium 0309 Comite d’Ethique Hospitalo-Facultaire Universitaire de Liege Centre Hospitalier Universitaire du Sart Tilman, B35 4000 Sart Tilman par Liege 1
Belgium 0311 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Brugman Attn. Valsamis Joseph
Place A. Van Gehuchten, 4 1020 Bruxelles --2
Belgium 0312 Comite d’Ethique Clinique Universitaire de Bruxelles
Hopital Erasme Route de Lennik 808 1070 Bruxelles - 7
Czech Republic 0401 Etická komise IKEM a FN Thomayerovy s poliklinikou
Vídeňská 800 140 59 Praha 4
Czech Republic 0402 Etická komise pro multicentrická hodnocení Fakultní nemocnice v Motole V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Praha 5
Czech Republic 0403 Etická komise Litomyšlská nemocnice
a.s. J. E. Purkyně 652 570 14 Litomyšl
Czech Republic 0404 Etická komise Nemocnice Jihlava Vrchlického 59 586 01 Jihlava
Czech Republic 0405 Etická komise pro multicentrická hodnocení Fakultní nemocnice v Motole V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Praha 5
Czech Republic 0406 Etická komise
Krajská nemocnice T. Bati a.s. Zlín Havlíčkovo nábřeží 600 762 75 Zlín
Czech Republic 0407 Etická komise Fakultní nemocnice Hradec Králové Sokolská 581500 05 Hradec Králové
Czech Republic 0408 Etická Komise Nemocnice Písek, a.s. Karla Čapka 589 397 23 Písek
Czech Republic 0409 Etická komise Nemocnice Tábor, a.s. Kpt. Jaroše 2000 390 03 Tábor
Czech Republic 0410 Etická komise
Nemocnice ve Frýdku-Místku, p.o. El. Krásnohorské 321 738 18 Frýdek-Místek
Czech Republic 0411 Etická komise
FN Brno Bohunice Jihlavská 20 625 00 Brno
Czech Republic 0412 Etická komise B. Braun Avitum Bulovka Budínova 67 181 02 Praha 8
Czech Republic 0413 Etická komise B. Braun Avitum Bulovka Budínova 67 181 02 Praha 8
Czech Republic 0414 Etická komise Nemocnice s poliklinikou v Novém Jičíně, p.o.
K Nemocnici 775/76 741 01 Nový Jičín
Czech Republic 0415 Etická komise B. Braun Avitum Bulovka Budínova 67 181 02 Praha 8
Czech Republic 0416 Etická komise Nemocnice Znojmo MUDr. Jana Janského 11 669 02 Znojmo
Czech Republic 0417 Etická komise B. Braun Avitum Bulovka Budínova 67 181 02 Praha 8
Czech Republic 0418 Etická komise společnosti Fresenius Medical Care - DS, s.r.o.
Lužná 591
160 05 Praha 6
Czech Republic 0419 Etická komise pro multicentrická hodnocení Fakultní nemocnice v Motole V Úvalu 84
150 06 Praha 5
Czech Republic 0420 Etická komise společnosti Fresenius Medical Care - DS, s.r.o.
Lužná 591
160 05 Praha 6
Czech Republic 0421 Etická komise společnosti Fresenius Medical Care - DS, s.r.o.
Lužná 591
160 05 Praha 6
Czech Republic 0422 Etická komise společnosti Fresenius Medical Care - DS, s.r.o.
Lužná 591
160 05 Praha 6
Czech Republic 0423 Etická komise společnosti Fresenius Medical Care - DS, s.r.o.
Lužná 591
160 05 Praha 6
Czech Republic 0424 Etická komise pro multicentrická hodnocení Fakultní nemocnice v Motole V Úvalu 84, 150 06 Praha 5
Denmark 0501 De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer for Region
Hovedstaden
Regionsgarden
Kongesn Vaenge
CK-3400 Hillerod
Denmark 0502 De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer for Region
Hovedstaden
Regionsgarden
Kongesn Vaenge
CK-3400 Hillerod
Denmark 0503 De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer for Region Hovedstaden
Regionsgården Kongens Vænge 2 DK-3400 Hillerød
Denmark 0504 De Videnskabsetiske Komiteer for Region
Hovedstaden
Regionsgarden
Kongesn Vaenge
CK-3400 Hillerod
France 0601 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV
Dr Alain DUBOIS
Hopital Saint Eloi
Rue Bertin Sand
34295 Montpellier
Cedex 5
France 0601 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV
Dr Alain DUBOIS
Hopital Saint Eloi
Rue Bertin Sand
34295 Montpellier
Cedex 5
France 0602 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France 0603 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France 0604 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France 0605 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France 0606 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France 0607 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France 0608 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France 0609 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France 0610 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France 0611 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
France 0612 CPP Sud-Méditerranée IV Dr Alain DUBOIS Hôpital Saint Eloi Rue Bertin Sans 34295 Montpellier Cedex 5
Germany 0701 Ethik-Kommmission bei der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universitat Wurzburg Institut für Pharmakologie und Toxikologie Versbacher Str. 9
97078 Wurzburg Wuerzburg
Germany 0702 Site 0702
Ethik-Kommission der Arztekammer Hamburg
Humboldtstr. 67a 22083 Hamburg
Germany 0703 Site 0703
Wthikkommission an der Medizinischen Fakultat Ernst-Moritz-Arndt-Universitat Greifswald Institut fur Pharmakologie
Friedrich-Loeffler-Str. 23d 17487 Greifswald
Germany 0704 Site 0704, 0721
Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Nordrhein Tersteegenstr. 9
40474 Dusseldorf
Germany 0705 Site 0705, 0708, 0710, 0711
Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der Medizinischen Fakultat der WWU-Munster Von-Esmarch-Strasse 62
48149 Munster
Germany 0706 Site 0706
Ethikkommission der Universitat Ulm Helmholtzstrasse 20
(Oberer Eselsberg) 89081 Ulm
Germany 0708 Site 0705, 0708, 0710, 0711
Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der Medizinischen Fakultat der WWU-Munster Von-Esmarch-Strasse 62
48149 Munster
Germany 0709 Site 0709, 0729
Ethik-Kommission der Landesarztekammer Hessen Im Vogelsang 3
60488 Frankfurt am Main
Germany 0710 Site 0705, 0708, 0710, 0711
Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der Medizinischen Fakultat der WWU-Munster Von-Esmarch-Strasse 62
48149 Munster
Germany 0711 Site 0705, 0708, 0710, 0711
Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Westfalen-Lippe und der Medizinischen Fakultat der WWU-Munster Von-Esmarch-Strasse 62
48149 Munster
Germany 0712 Site 0712, 0726
Ethik-Kommission der Bayerischen Landesarztekammer Muhlbaurstrasse 16 81677 Munchen
Germany 0713 Site 0713, 0725
Landesamt fur Gesundheit und Soziales Geschaftsstelle der Ethik-Kommission des Landes Berlin Fehrbelliner Platz 1
10707 Berlin
Germany 0714 Site 0714, 0722
Ethikkommission Landesarztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz Deutschhausplatz 3 55116 Mainz
Germany 0715 Site 0715
Ethikkommission an der Med. Fakultat der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universitat Bonn
Biomedizinisches Zentrum Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25 53105 Bonn
Germany 0716 Site 0716
Ethik-Kommission des Fachbereichs Medizin der Johann Wolfgang Goethe- Universitat Haus 1 Theodor-Stern-Kai 7
60590 Frankfurt
Germany 0717 Site 0717, 0730
Ethik-Kommission bei der Landesarztekammer Baden-Wurttemberg Jahnstr. 40 70597 Stuttgart
Germany 0719 Site 0719
Ethikkommission bei der Arztekammer Niedersachsen zur Beurteilung Medizinischer
Forschung am Menschen Berliner Allee 20 30175 Hannover
Germany 0720 Site 0720
Ethikkommission bei der Sachsischen Landesarztekammer Schutzenhohe 16
99 Dresden
Germany 0721 Site 0704, 0721
Ethikkommission der Arztekammer Nordrhein Tersteegenstr. 9
40474 Dusseldorf
Germany 0722 Site 0714, 0722
Ethikkommission Landesarztekammer Rheinland-Pfalz Deutschhausplatz 3 55116 Mainz
Germany 0724 Site 0724
Ethik-Kommission der Otto-von-Guericke- Universitat an der Medizinischen Fakultat Leipziger Str. 44 39120 Magdeburg
Germany 0725 Site 0713, 0725
Landesamt fur Gesundheit und Soziales Geschaftsstelle der Ethik-Kommission des Landes Berlin Fehrbelliner Platz 1
10707 Berlin
Germany 0726 Site 0712, 0726
Ethik-Kommission der Bayerischen
Landesarztekammer
Muhlbaurstrasse 16
81677 Munchen
Germany 0727 Site 0727
Ethik-Kommission der Universitat Witten/Herdecke Alfred-Herrhausen-Str. 50
58448 Witten
Germany 0728 Site 0728
Ethikkommission der Med. Fakultat der
Universitat zu Koln
Gebaude 5
Kerpener Str. 62
50937 Koln
Germany 0729 Site 0709, 0729
Ethik-Kommission der Landesarztekammer
Hessen
Im Vogelsang 3
60488 Frankfurt am Main
Germany 0730 Site 0717, 0730
Ethik-Kommission bei der
LandesarztekammerBaden-Wurttemberg
Jahnstr. 40
70597 Stuttgart
Germany 0731 Site 0731
Ethik-Kommission der Landesarztekammer
Brandenburg
Dreifertstrasse 12
03044 Cottbus
Greece 0801 Ethical Committee
General University Hospital of Thessaloniki “Papgeorgiou” Thessaloniki Ring Road, Nea Efkarpia Thessaloniki, 56429
Greece 0802 General Hospital of Thessaloniki “Ippokrateion” 49 Konstantinoupoleos st. Thessaloniki, 56442
Greece 0803 ATTIKON General University Hospital of Athens 1 Rimini Str.
Chaidari, Athens, 12462
Greece 0804 General University Hospital of Alexandroupolis Dragana Alexandroupolis, 68100
Greece 0805 Ethical Commitee
General University Hospital of Larissa Mezourlo Larissa, 41110
Greece 0806 Ethics Committee
Achillopoulio General Prefecture Hospital of Volos 134 Polyeri street
Volos, 38222
Greece 0807 Ethical Commitee
General Hospital of Rhodes Aghioi Aphostoloi Rhodes, 85100
Greece 0808 Ethical Commitee
IPPOKRATEION General Hospital of Athens 114 Vas. Sofias Ave Athens, 11526
Greece 0809 Ethical Commitee
General Hospital of Athens, KORGALENEIO- BENAKEIO Athenasaki Str. 1
Athens, 11526
Greece 0810 Ethical Commitee
General Prefecture Hospital of Ioannina, XATZIKOSTA Avv. Makrigianni 1
Ioannina, 45550
Greece 0811 Ethical Commitee
General University Hospital of Patras Rio-Patras Street Rios Patras, 16500
Greece 0812 Ethical Commitee
General University Hospital of Ioannina Stavros Niarchos Avenue Ioannina, 45550
Greece 0813 Ethical Commitee General Hospital of Arta
A. Zara Str 4 Arta, 47100
Greece 0815 Ethical Commitee
General Hospital of Peireus “Tzaneio” Zanni & Afendouli Peireus, 18536
Greece 0817 Ethical Commitee
General Prefecture Hospital of Argos 191 Korinthou Str.
Argos, 21200
Greece 0818 Ethical Commitee
LAIKO General Hospital of Athens 17 Aghiou Thomas Str.
Athens, 11527
Greece 0819 Ethical Commitee
General Hospital of Mytilene “Vostanio” 48 E. Vostani Str.
Vestos, 81100
Greece 0820 Ethical Commitee General Hospital of Serres 2nd k of Serres-Drama National Road Serres, 62100
Greece 0821 Ethical Commitee
KYANOUS STAVROS General Hospital of Athens
102, Vas Sofias Ave Athens, 11528
Greece 0822 Ethical Commitee
IASO General Hospital of Athens Cholargos Athens, 11526
Greece 0823 Ethical Commitee
General Hospital of Athens “Henry Dunant” 107 Messogheion Ave Athens, 11526
Italy 1001 Comitato Etico
Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera di Lecco Via Dell’Eremo 9/11 Lecco, 23900
Italy 1002 Comitato Etico Locale per la Sperimentazione Clinical Della AUSL 12 di Viareggio Via Aurelia 335
55045 Lido di Cà Maiore (LC)
Italy 1003 Comitato Etico Dell’Azeinda Ospedaliera Universitaria Della Seconda Univestità degli Studi di Napoli Via Costatinopoli, 104
80138 Napoli
Italy 1004 Comitato Etico Indipendente dell’Azienda ospedaliero-Univesitaria Policlinico S. Orsola Via Albertoni 15
40138 Bologna
Italy 1005 Comitato Etico Della ASL TO/2 di Torino Corso Svizzera 185 bis 10149 Torino
Italy 1007 Comitato di Bioetica della Azienda Ospedali Riuniti di Bergam Largo Barozzi 1
24128 Bergamo
Italy 1008 Comitato Etico ASL di Caserta Via Unità Italiana 28 81100 Caserta
Italy 1009 Comitato Etico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria ‘S. Martin’ di Genova Largo Rosanna Benzi 10 16132 Genova
Italy 1 Comitato Etico Della Provincia di Modena Via Largo del Pozzo 71 41124 Modena
Italy 1011 Comitato Etico ASL CE/1 Di Caserta Via Unità Italiana 28 81100 Caserta
Italy 1012 Comitato Etico Regionale Unico (CERU) AOU Santa Maria della Misericordia Piazzale Santa maria della Misericordia 15 33100 Udine
Italy 1013 Comitato Etico Scientifico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale S. Carlo Borromeo di Milano
Via Pio II° n° 3 20153 Milano
Italy 1014 Comitato Bioetico Dell’Azienda Cannizzaro di Catania Via Messina 829
95126 Catania
Italy 1016 Comitato Ethico-Scientifico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale Niguara Ca’ Granda Di Milano Piazza Ospedale Maggiore n. 3 20162 Milano
Italy 1017 Comitato Etico Della AUSL RM/H Di Albano Laziale
Borgo Garibaldi n. 12 00041 Albano Laziale (RM)
Italy 1018 Comitato Etico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Pugliese-Ciaccio Di Catanzaro
Via Vinicio Cortese, 10 88100 Catanzaro
Italy 1020 Comitato Etico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Giovanni Battista di Torino C so Bramante 88/90 10126 Torino
Italy 1021 Comitato Etico Scientifico Dell’Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedale S. Carlo Borrome di Milano
Via Pio II°, n°3 20153 Milano
Italy 1022 Comitato Etico Central Dell’IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri Di Pavia Via Salvatore Maugeri 4 27100 Pavia
Italy 1023 Comitato Etico Sperimentazione clinical Medicinali Della AUSL 8 Di Arezzo Via Curtatone 54
52100 Arezzo
Italy 1024 Comitato Etico
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Ospedali Riuniti di figgia
Viale Luigi Pinto 71100 Foggia
Italy 1026 Comitato di Etica Della ASL di Salerno Via Federico Ricco, 50 84014 Noceria Inferiore (SA)
Italy 1027 Comitato Etico Per le Sperimentazioni Cliniche die Medicinali Della Provincia di Venezia
Via Don Federico Tosatto 147 30174 Venezia
Italy 1028 Comitato Etico Della AUSL RM/G di Tivoli Via Tiburtina 22/a 00019 Tivoli (RM)
Italy 1029 Comitato Etico Delle Aziende Sanitarie Dell’Umbria di Perugia
Via della Rivoluzione 16 Ellera di Corciano (PG) 06070 Perugia
Netherlan ds 1101 Meander Medical Center, Lichtenberg location Toetsingscommissie Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Secretariat, P&O Room N042 Utrechtseweg 160
3818 ES Amersfoort The Netherlands
Netherlan ds 1102 Medical Ethics Review Committee Zuidwest Holland Fonteynenburghlaan 7
2275 CX VOORBURG
The Netherlands
Netherlan ds 1102 Medical Ethics Review Committee Gelre Hospital Albert Schweitzerlaan 31
7334 DZ Apeldoorn The Netherlands
Netherlan ds 1103 Medical Ethics Review Committee Gelre Hospital Albert Schweitzerlaan 31
7334 DZ Apeldoorn The Netherlands
Netherlan ds 1104 Medical Ethics Review Committee Albert Schweitzer Hospital loc. DW, Postvak 7, kmr. Z 150
T.a.v. Ms. A. de Graag – de Vries Albert Schweitzerplaats 25 3318 AT Dordrecht The Netherlands
Netherlan ds 1105 METc VU Medical Center Medical Faculty, Room H-565 Van der Boerchorststraat 7 1081 BT Amsterdam The Netherlands
Netherlan ds 1106 Medical Ethics Review Committee Noord- Holland
Foreest Medical School Nassauplein 10 1815 GM Alkmaar The Netherlands
Norway 1201 Regional Committees for Medical and Health Research Ethics (REK) REK-Midt
Bygg for samfunnsmedisin (5 etg) Håkon Jarlsgt. 11, St. Olavs Hospital Trondheim
Poland 1301 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1302 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1303 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1306 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1309 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1311 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1313 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1314 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1315 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1316 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1318 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1320 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1321 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1322 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1323 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1324 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1326 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1327 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1328 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1329 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1330 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Poland 1331 Niezależna Komisja Bioetyczna do Spraw Badań Naukowych przy Gdańskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym ul. M. Skłodowskiej-Curie 3a, 80-201 Gdańsk, Polska
Portugal 1402 CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Portugal 1403 CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Portugal 1404 CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Portugal 1405 CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Portugal 1406 CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Portugal 1407 CEIC- National Ethics Committee for Clinical Investigation Parque da Saúde de Lisboa- Avenida do Brasil, 53 1749-004 Lisboa- Portugal
Spain 1501 Hospital Universitario Dr Peset de Valencia CEIC, a/a Raquel E. Blesa, C/Juan de Garray 21, 1er Piso Consultas externas, 46017 Valencia
Spain 1503 Hospital Universitario Dr Peset de Valencia CEIC, a/a Raquel E. Blesa, C/Juan de Garray 21, 1er Piso Consultas externas, 46017 Valencia
Spain 1504 CEIC Hospital Universitario La Paz(LEC) Paseo de la Castellana, 261, Planta 8a Hospital General, 28046 Madrid
Spain 1505 CEIC Fundació Puigvert IUNA (LEC) Agencia de Gestio del Coneixement Cartagena, 340-350 08025 Barcelona
Spain 1506 CEIC Hospital Universitario General Gregorio Marañón (CEC) CEIC Area 1, C/ dr Esquerdo, 46, 28007 Madrid
Spain 1507 Agencia de Ensayos Clinicos - servicio de Farmacia Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, c/ Villarroel, 170 - Sotano, Escalera 6b, 08036 Barcelona
Spain 1509 CEIC Hospital Universitario de Bellvitge Edificio Consultas Externas. Planta -1, C/ Feixa Llarga, s/n, 08907 L’Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona
Spain 1510 CEIC Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Edifici Institut de Recerca, 2a planta Passeig Vall d’Hebron 119-129, Barcelona 08035
Spain 1512 CEIC Hospital Universitario Fundación de Alcorcón (LEC) C/ Budapest N1, 28922 Alcorcon, Madrid
Spain 1513 CEIC Clinica de Asturias
Hospital Central de Asturias, Celestino Villamil, s/n, 33006 Oviedo
Spain 1514 Hopsital Universitario “Reina Sofia” Comite Etico de Ensayos Clinicos, Edificio de Consultas Externas, planta -1, Avda. Menendez Pidal, s/n, 14004 Cordoba
Spain 1515 Hospital Torrecardenas CEIC
Paraje Torrecardenas, s/n, 04009 Almeria
Spain 1516 Fundacion Jimenez Diaz CEIC, Avda. Reyes Catolicos, 2, Entrplanta, 28040 Madrid
Spain 1517 Hospital Universitario Principe de Asturias CEIC, Ctra. Alcala-Meco s/n, 28805 Alcala de Henares, Madrid
Spain 1518 CEIC de Aragon, Avda. Gomez Laguna, 25 planta 11, 50009 Zaragoza
Spain 1519 Hospital Universitario de Puerto Real, Ctra. NaI IV, km. 665, 11510 Puerto Real, Cadiz
Spain 1520 CEIC Hospital Universitario de Getafe (LEC) Ctra. De Toledo, km. 12500, 28905 Getafe, Madrid
Spain 1521 CEIC Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Findacion para la Investigacion Biomedica, C/ Diego de leon, 62, 28006 Madrid
Spain 1522 CEIC Hospital Universitario de Girona Josep Trueta (LEC) avda. De Franca s/n, 17007 Girona
Spain 1523 CEIC Parc Salut del Mar (LEC)
IMIM-Hospital del Mar, Parc de Recerca Biomedica de Barcelona, Doctor Aiguader, 88, 08003 Barcelona
Sweden 1601 Regionala etikprövningsnämnden
Stockholm FE 289
Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, 17179
Sweden 1602 Regionala etikprövningsnämnden
Stockholm FE 289
Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, 17179
Sweden 1603 Regionala etikprövningsnämnden
Stockholm FE 289
Karolinska Institutet
Stockholm, 17179
Switzerland 1701 Kantonal Ethikkommission Aargau Departement Gesundheit und Soziales PD Dr. med. Otto Hilfiker Bachstrasse 15
5001 Aarau
Switzerlan d 1702 Kantonal Ethik-Kommission (KEK) Prof. Dr. med. Robert Maurer Universitätsspital Zürich Sonneggstr. 12 8091 Zürich
Switzerlan d 1703 Kantonal Ethik-Kommission (KEK) Prof. Dr. med. Robert Maurer Universitätsspital Zürich Sonneggstr. 12 8091 Zürich
Switzerlan d 1704 Kantonal Ethikkommission Bern (KEK) Prof. Dr. pharm. Nilaus Tüller Postfach 56 3 Bern
Turkey 1801 Ankara University Medical Faculty Deanship Clinical Researches Ethics Committee nkara Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Morfoloji Binası 06100 Sihhiye Ankara Turkey
Turkey 1802 Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey 1803 Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey 1804 Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey 1804 Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey 1807 Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey 1810 Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
Turkey 1811 Ege University Medical Faculty Clinical Researches Ethics Committee Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi; 35100 Bornova Izmir
United Kingdom 1901 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1902 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1903 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1904 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1905 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1906 Health Research Authority
NRES Committee Riverside REC
Bristol REC Centre
Whitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom 1907 Health Research Authority
NRES Committee Riverside REC
Bristol REC Centre
Whitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom 1908 Health Research Authority
NRES Committee Riverside REC
Bristol REC Centre
Whitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom 1909 Health Research Authority
NRES Committee Riverside REC
Bristol REC Centre
Whitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom 1910 Health Research Authority
NRES Committee Riverside REC
Bristol REC Centre
Whitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom 1911 Health Research Authority
NRES Committee Riverside REC
Bristol REC Centre
Whitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom 1912 Health Research Authority
NRES Committee Riverside REC
Bristol REC Centre
Whitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom 1913 Health Research Authority
NRES Committee Riverside REC
Bristol REC Centre
Whitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom 1914 Health Research Authority
NRES Committee Riverside REC
Bristol REC Centre
Whitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom 1915 Health Research Authority
NRES Committee Riverside REC
Bristol REC Centre
Whitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom 1916 Health Research Authority
NRES Committee Riverside REC
Bristol REC Centre
Whitefriars, Lewins Mead
United Kingdom 1917 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1918 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1919 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1920 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1921 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1922 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1923 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1924 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1925 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1926 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1927 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1928 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1929 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 19230 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1931 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1932 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
United Kingdom 1933 Health Research Authority NRES Committee Riverside REC Bristol REC Centre
Level 3, Block B Whitefriars Lewins Mead Bristol, BS 1 2NT
Romania 2001 National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania 2002 National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania 2003 National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania 2004 National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania 2005 National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania 2006 National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
Romania 2007 National Ethics Committee for Clinical Study of Medicine (Comisia Nationala de Etica pentru Studiul Clinic al Medicamentului) Av. Sanatescu St., No. 48, 1st district, 011478, Bucharest, Romania
US 2110 Salem VA Medical Center IRB Kim Ragsdale, PhD 1970 Roanoke Blvd
Salem. VA 24153
US 2113 Integreview IRB Valerie Nelson
3001, South Lamar Blvd Suite 210 Austin, TX 78704
US 2105 Integreview IRB Valerie Nelson
3001, South Lamar Blvd Suite 210 Austin, TX 78704
US 2114 Temple VA Medical Cener IRB John W Klocek, PhD 1901 Veterans Memorial Drive Temple, TX 76504

Additional files

Additional file 1: Table S1. (12.6KB, docx)

Baseline characteristics (ITT population). (DOCX 12 kb)

Additional file 2: Table S2. (12.7KB, docx)

Mean (SD) change in estimated GFR (eGFR) from baseline to month 12 for subpopulations of patients with eGFR values both time points. (DOCX 12 kb)

Additional file 3: Figure S1. (1.2MB, eps)

Scatter plot of change in eGFR from baseline to month 12 according to total IV iron dose in patients randomized to either high ferritin or low ferritin FCM for patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12. The solid line indicates the linear regression for all points. The dotted line indicates 0 i.e. no change. eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FCM, ferric carboxymaltose. (EPS 1219 kb)

Additional file 4: Figure S2. (456.6KB, zip)

(a) Ferritin and (b) transferrin saturation (TSAT) for patients with eGFR values at baseline and month 12 who did or did not receive alternative anemia therapy or permanently discontinued study therapy before month 12. BL, baseline; FCM, ferric carboxymaltose. (ZIP 456 kb)

Additional file 5: Table S3. (11.7KB, docx)

Selected renal adverse events and serious adverse events (safety population). (DOCX 11 kb)

Contributor Information

Iain C. Macdougall, Phone: +44-203-299-6233, Email: iain.macdougall@nhs.net

Andreas H. Bock, Email: Andreas.Bock@ksa.ch

Fernando Carrera, Email: fcarrera@mail.telepac.pt.

Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Email: Kai-Uwe.Eckardt@uk-erlangen.de.

Carlo Gaillard, Email: c.a.j.m.gaillard@umcg.nl.

David Van Wyck, Email: david.vanwyck@davita.com.

Yvonne Meier, Email: yvonne.meier@viforpharma.com.

Sylvain Larroque, Email: syvlain.larroque@viforpharma.com.

Simon D. Roger, Email: sdroger@bigpond.net.au

on behalf of the FIND-CKD Study investigators:

Simon D. Roger, Alastair Gilles, Randall Faull, Nigel D. Toussaint, Lawrence McMahon, Michael Suranyi, David Mudge, Brian Hutchison, Ashley Irish, Peter Kerr, Hemant Kulkarni, Grahame Elder, Margaret Jardine, Karl Lhotta, Gert Mayer, Raymond Vanholder, Bart Dirk Maes, Pieter Evenepoel, Frédéric Debelle, Michel Jadoul, Max Dratwa, Igor Macel, Milan Dunaj, Milan Kvapil, Petr Bucek, Jitka Rehorova, Ales Hruby, Václava Honová, Lada Malanova, Martin Lucak, Dalibor Lecian, Martin Jirovec, Jiri Vlasak, Ivan Rychlik, Stanislav Surel, Anne-Lise Kamper, Ove Ostergaard, Gudrun K. Steffensen, Leila Chenine, Gabrial Choukroun, Philippe Zaoui, Christoph Wanner, Wolfgang Backs, Uwe Kraatz, Frank Dellanna, Klaus Busch, Tobias Marsen, Wolfgang Seeger, Rainer Woitas, Nicholas Obermueller, Thomas Haak, Stephan Lueders, Frank Pistrosch, Eckhard Mueller, Peter R. Mertens, Werner Sutermer, Scott-Oliver Grebe, Syrus Hafezi-Rachti, Silke Roeser, Dimitrios Tsakiris, Dimitrios Memmos, Demetrios Vlachakos, Vassilis Vargemezis, Ioannis Stefanidis, Christos Syrganis, Polichronis Alivanis, Ioannis Papadakis, Nickolaos Papagalanis, Aimilios Andrikos, Dimitrios Goumenos, Kostas Siamopoulos, Charikelia Gouva, Gabriel Papadakis, Ioannis Boletis, Myrsini Tsimnadi-Spanoudaki, Dimitrios Stamatiades, Kyriaki Stamatelou, Spyridon Moutafis, Francesco Locatelli, Antonio Santoro, Francesco Quarello, Giuseppe Remuzzi, Salvatore Coppola, Rosella Ferraro Mortellaro, Andrea Icardi, Giacomo Colussi, Franco Della Grotta, Luigi Lombardi, Maurizio Gallieni, Giuseppe Villa, Giuseppe Grandaliano, Carlo Gaillard, Sebastiaan Huisman, Jos Barendregt, Peter J. H. Smak Gregoor, Cecilia Oien, Boleslaw Rutkowski, Robert Malecki, Michal Nowicki, Przemyslaw Rutkowski, Kryzsztof Marczewski, Michal Mysliwiec, Antoni Sydor, Jacek Rysz, Andrzej Rydzewski, Marian Klinger, Rafal Wnuk, Piotr Kozminski, Anna Nocon, Kazimierz Ciechanowski, Pedro Correia, Fernando Neves, José Barata, Gabriel Mircescu, Mihai Voiculescu, Gheorghe Gluhovschi, Eugen Mota, Angel Luís Martín De Francisco, Alberto Torre, Alba Herreros, José Luño, E Gruss, Judith Martins, Marti Vallés, Julio Pascual, Peter Bárány, Andreas H. Bock, Patrice M. Ambuehl, Sehsuvar Erturk, Mustafa Arici, Saime Paydas, Zeki Soypacaci, Taner Camsari, Sedat Ustundag, Iain C. Macdougall, Mark E. Thomas, Richard J. D’Souza, Jo E. Taylor, Nicholas R. Pritchard, Robin Jeffery, Stephen G. Riley, Deepak Bhatnagar, Sunil Bhandari, David Reaich, Paul E. Stevens, Mohsen El Kossi, Simon Roe, Brian Camilleri, Aimun Ahmed, Arif Khwaja, Barbara Thompson, Debasish Banerjee, Johann Nicholas, Alistair Hutchison, and Richard Borrows

References

  • 1.Freburger JK, Ng LJ, Bradbury BD, Kshirsagar AV, Brookhart MA. Changing patterns of anemia management in US hemodialysis patients. Am J Med. 2012;125:906–914. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2012.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Unger EG, Thompson AM, Blank MJ, Temple R. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents – time for a reevaluation. New Engl J Med. 2010;362:189–192. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp0912328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Solomon SE, Uno H, Lewis EF, Eckardt KU, Lin J, Burdmann EA, de Zeeuw D, Ivanovich P, Levey AS, Parfrey P, Remuzzi G, Singh AK, Toto R, Huang F, Rossert J, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA. Trial to Reduce Cardiovascular Events with Aranesp Therapy (TREAT) Investigators. Erythropoietic response and outcomes in kidney disease and type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1146–1155. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1005109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Macdougall IC, Tucker B, Thompson J, Tomson CR, Baker LR, Raine AE. A randomized controlled study of iron supplementation in patients treated with erythropoietin. Kidney Int. 1996;50:1694–1699. doi: 10.1038/ki.1996.487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Li H, Wang SX. Intravenous iron sucrose in Chinese hemodialysis patients with renal anemia. Blood Purif. 2008;26:151–156. doi: 10.1159/000113529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Warady BA, Kausz A, Lerner G, Brewer ED, Chadha V, Brugnara C, Dahl NV, Watkins SL. Iron therapy in the pediatric hemodialysis population. Pediatr Nephrol. 2004;19:655–661. doi: 10.1007/s00467-004-1457-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Qunibi WY, Martinez C, Smith M, Benjamin J, Mangione A, Roger SD. A randomised controlled trial comparing intravenous ferric carboxymaltose with oral iron for treatment of iron deficiency anaemia of non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2011;26:1599–1607. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq613. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Charytan C, Qunibi W, Bailie GR, Venofer Clinical Studies Group Comparison of intravenous iron sucrose to oral iron in the treatment of anemic patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis. Nephron Clin Pract. 2005;100:c55–c62. doi: 10.1159/000085049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Spinowitz BS, Kausz AT, Baptista J, Noble SD, Sothinathan R, Bernardo MV, Brenner L, Pereira BJ. Ferumoxytol for treating iron deficiency anemia in CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19:1599–1605. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2007101156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Van Wyck DB, Roppolo M, Martinez CO, Mazey RM, McMurray S, United States Iron Sucrose (Venofer) Clinical Trials Group A randomized, controlled trial comparing IV iron sucrose to oral iron in anemic patients with nondialysis-dependent CKD. Kidney Int. 2005;68:2846–2856. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00758.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Charytan C, Bernardo MV, Koch TA, Butcher A, Morris D, Bregman DB. Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose versus standard medical care in the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized, active-controlled, multi-center study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013;28:953–964. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfs528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Macdougall IC, Bock AH, Carrera F, Eckardt KU, Gaillard C, Van Wyck D, Roubert B, Nolen JG, Roger SD, FIND-CKD Study Investigators FIND-CKD: a randomized trial of intravenous ferric carboxymaltose versus oral iron in patients with chronic kidney disease and iron deficiency anaemia. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:2075–2084. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfu201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bishu K, Agarwal R. Acute injury with intravenous iron and concerns regarding long-term safety. Clin Am J Soc Nephrol. 2006;1(Suppl 1):S19–S23. doi: 10.2215/CJN.01420406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Zanen AL, Adriaansen HJ, van Bommel EF, Posthuma R, de Jong GMT. ‘Oversaturation’ of transferrin after intravenous iron gluconate (Ferrlecit®) in haemodialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11:820–824. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.ndt.a027405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Pai AB, Conner T, McQuade CR, Olp J, Hicks P. Non-transferrin bound iron, cytokine activation and intracellular reactive oxygen species generation in hemodialysis patients receiving intravenous iron dextran or iron sucrose. Biometals. 2011;24:603–613. doi: 10.1007/s10534-011-9409-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Johnson AC, Becker K, Zager RA. Parenteral iron formulations differentially affect MCP-1, HO-1, and NGAL gene expression and renal responses to injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2010;299:F426–F435. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00248.2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Toblli JE, Cao G, Olivieri L, Angerosa M. Comparison of the renal, cardiovascular and hepatic toxicity data of original intravenous iron compounds. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:3631–3640. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfq260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Toblli JE, Cao G, Giani JF, Dominici FP, Angerosa M. Nitrosative stress and apoptosis by intravenous ferumoxytol, iron isomaltoside 1000, iron dextran, iron sucrose, and ferric carboxymaltose in a nonclinical model. Drug Res (Stuttg) 2015;65:354–360. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Agarwal R, Leehey DJ, Olsen SM, Dahl NV. Proteinuria induced by parenteral iron in chronic kidney disease--a comparative randomized controlled trial. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:114–121. doi: 10.2215/CJN.06020710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Agarwal R, Rizkala AR, Kaskas MO, Minasian R, Trout JR. Iron sucrose causes greater proteinuria than ferric gluconate in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2007;72:638–642. doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5002422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Leehey DJ, Palubiak DJ, Chebrolu S, Agarwal R. Sodium ferric gluconate causes oxidative stress but not acute renal injury in patients with chronic kidney disease: a pilot study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20:135–140. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfh565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Agarwal R, Vasavada N, Sachs NG, Chase S. Oxidative stress and renal injury with intravenous iron in patients with chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2004;65:2279–2289. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2004.00648.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Agarwal R. On the nature of proteinuria with acute renal injury in patients with chronic kidney disease. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2005;288:F265–F271. doi: 10.1152/ajprenal.00318.2004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Agarwal R, Kusek JW, Pappas MK. A randomized trial of intravenous and oral iron in chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2015;88:905–914. doi: 10.1038/ki.2015.163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Macdougall IC, Bock A, Carrera F, Eckardt KU, Gaillard C, Van Wyck D, Roubert B, Cushway T, Roger SD, FIND-CKD Study Investigators The FIND-CKD study--a randomized controlled trial of intravenous iron versus oral iron in non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients: background and rationale. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29:843–850. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gft424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:461–470. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-6-199903160-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Levey AS, Stevens LA, Schmid CH, Zhang YL, Castro AF, 3rd, Feldman HI, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Greene T, Coresh J, CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:604–612. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-9-200905050-00006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Levey AS, Inker LA, Coresh J. GFR estimation: from physiology to public health. Am J Kidney Dis. 2014;63:820–834. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2013.12.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.McMahon LP, Kent AB, Kerr PG, Healy H, Irish AB, Cooper B, Kark A, Roger SD. Maintenance of elevated versus physiological iron indices in non-anaemic patients with chronic kidney disease: a randomized controlled trial. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:920–926. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfp584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Malindretos P, Sarafidis PA, Redenco I, Raptis V, Makedou K, Makedou A, Grekas DM. Slow intravenous iron administration does not aggravate oxidative stress and inflammatory biomarkers during hemodialysis: a comparative study between iron sucrose and iron dextran. Am J Nephrol. 2007;27:572–579. doi: 10.1159/000107928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data relating to the primary FIND-CKD study analysis can be obtained at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00994318?term=FIND+CKD&rank=1.All source data for the current analysis are available from the authors. Requests may be emailed to: iain.macdougall@nhs.net.


Articles from BMC Nephrology are provided here courtesy of BMC

RESOURCES