Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Infancy. 2016 Apr 3;22(1):78–107. doi: 10.1111/infa.12147

Table 3.

Results of fitted models for the effects of maternal sensitivity and cognitive stimulation on children’s language development from 14 to 36 months (n = 120 children).

A B C D

Fixed Effects Effects of
Time-
Varying
Parenting
Dimensions
Change in
Effects of
Time-Varying
Parenting
Dimensions
Parsimonious
Effects of
Time-Varying
Parenting
Dimensions
Interaction
Between
Time-Varying
Parenting
Dimensions
Intercept (at age 14m) 2.56
(1.98)
2.32
(1.95)
2.10
(1.95)
2.29
(2.18)
 Child Sex (Boy = 1, Girl = −1) −3.66*
(1.47)
−3.57*
(1.46)
−3.64*
(1.47)
−3.62*
(1.48)
 Maternal Risk Composite (Centered) 1.57
(1.97)
1.76
(1.96)
2.04
(1.96)
2.04
(1.98)
 EHS (Program = 1, Control = 0) 1.46
(1.53)
1.83
(1.52)
1.67
(1.52)
1.67
(1.53)
Growth (child age in months) 3.22***
(0.12)
3.29***
(0.12)
3.30***
(0.12)
3.28***
(0.14)
Time-Varying Sensitivity (z-score) 4.63**
(1.68)
2.81
(2.22)
4.76**
(1.63)
4.73**
(1.79)
 Change in Effect of Sensitivity (sensitivity*child age) 0.21
(0.16)
Time-Varying Stimulation (z-score) 3.50*
(1.58)
0.32
(2.14)
−0.80
(1.96)
−0.81
(2.02)
 Change in Effect of Stimulation (stimulation*child age) 0.32*
(0.16)
0.45***
(0.13)
0.45**
(0.13)
Moderation of Stimulation by Sensitivity (sensitivity*stimulation) 0.03
(0.12)

Variance
 Between Child Intercept 91.03** 95.01** 97.37** 98.37**
 Within Child 260.69*** 241.76*** 241.22*** 243.21***

Model Fit
 -2LL 1986.61 1976.79 1976.70 1976.69

~ p < .10,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001