Skip to main content
The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science logoLink to The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science
. 2016 Aug 27;78(12):1779–1784. doi: 10.1292/jvms.16-0293

Prevalence of gastrointestinal helminth parasites of zoonotic significance in dogs and cats in lower Northern Thailand

Wilawan PUMIDONMING 1,2,3, Doaa SALMAN 3,4, Dulyatad GRONSANG 5, Abdelbaset E ABDELBASET 3,6, Khamphon SANGKAEO 7, Shin-ichiro KAWAZU 3, Makoto IGARASHI 3,*
PMCID: PMC5240754  PMID: 27570099

Abstract

Gastrointestinal zoonotic helminths of dogs and cats have a public health concern worldwide. We investigated the prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths of zoonotic significance in dogs and cats in lower Northern Thailand and utilized molecular tools for species identification of hookworms and Opisthorchis viverrini. Fecal samples of 197 dogs and 180 cats were collected. Overall prevalence of infection using microscopy was 40.1% in dogs and 33.9% in cats. Helminth infection found in both dogs and cats included hookworms, Spirometra spp., Taenia spp., Toxocara spp., O. viverrini, Strongyloides spp. and Trichuris spp. Hookworms were the most common helminth in dogs, while Spirometra spp. were the most prevalent in cats. Among hookworm infection in dogs and cats, Ancylostoma ceylanicum was the most prevalent hookworm, being 82.1% in hookworm infected dogs and 95.8% in hookworm infected cats. Mixed-infection due to hookworms and Spirometra spp. was the most dominant in both dogs and cats. Our finding showed that zoonotic helminth infection is highly prevalent in dogs and cats in the lower Northern area of Thailand.

Keywords: cat, dog, gastrointestinal helminth, Thailand, zoonotic parasite


Dogs and cats play a significant role as reservoir hosts for gastrointestinal zoonotic parasites including protozoa, trematode, cestode and nematode [7, 22, 24]. Humans can be infected via contact with a dog or cat or via contamination of infective stages in food or water [20, 35]. Worldwide, there is a significant variation in the prevalence of gastrointestinal zoonotic helminths in dogs and cats [19, 24]. High infection rates of zoonotic parasites including hookworms, Trichuris spp., Spirometra spp., Taenia spp., Toxocara spp. and Opisthorchis spp. have been reported [11, 17, 19, 24].

Infection of zoonotic helminths has previously been researched in Thailand. In the central area, a high prevalence of hookworm Ancylostoma ceylanicum was reported among dogs in temple communities in Bangkok [33]. The infections of zoonotic helminths, hookworms, Trichuris spp., Toxocara spp. and Spirometra spp. were found in dogs and cats in animal refuges [28]. In the Northeastern area, a high infection rate of liver fluke, Opisthorchis viverrini (O. viverrini) in dogs and cats, was found in communities where O. viverrini infection in human was high [3].

In Thailand, infections of hookworms and O. viverrini are the major public health problems [15, 16, 25, 30, 33]. Infections of zoonotic hookworms, A. ceylanicum and A. caninum, have been reported in many areas [25, 33]. Molecular analysis showed A. ceylanicum is prevalent in humans and dogs in the Central and the Northeastern areas of Thailand [25, 33]. Prevalence and species of zoonotic hookworms in dogs and cats in the lower Northern area of Thailand are still unknown.

The infection of O. viverrini often coexists with minute intestinal flukes [9, 27]. Eggs of O. viverrini and minute intestinal flukes are similar in size and shape and are both operculated [32]. Microscopic examination for fecal eggs often leads to misdiagnosis [37]. PCR analysis with O. viverrini specific primers provides high sensitivity and specific results for the parasite detection [6, 18, 36]. In this study, dog and cat fecal samples were collected from communities where inhabitants originally migrated from the Northeastern area (pumidonming, interview), where O. viverrini is endemic [30]. Therefore, specific identification of O. viverrini infection in reservoir hosts around the communities at high risk of the infection is required for effective surveillance and control program.

Although surveys of zoonotic gastrointestinal helminths in dogs and cats had been done in Thailand, most of the studies have focused on the Central or Northeastern region [3, 12, 28, 33]. This was the first study to investigate prevalence of zoonotic helminth infection in dogs and cats in the lower Northern area of Thailand. In addition, this was the first study to identify species of hookworm infection in dogs and cats in the study area.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study area: The study area is located in the lower Northern part of Thailand. Borders of the lower Northern Thailand connect to the upper Northern, the Central and the Northeastern parts and in addition connect to Lao People’s Democratic Republic and Myanmar (Fig. 1). The climate is tropical and humid. The communities where samples were collected were characterized by poor hygiene. Over 50% of inhabitants in the communities originally migrated from the Northeastern area of Thailand (pumidonming, interview).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Maps of Thailand showing the major regions and indicating the location of studied area.

Collection and examination of fecal samples: Animal procedures were reviewed and approved by the Animal Research Ethics Committee of Naresuan University, Thailand. Fecal samples were collected from 197 dogs and 180 cats from the lower Northern region of Thailand between February and April 2014. Fecal samples were individually collected per rectum from each animal presented at the time of the investigation. General information including age, diet, defecation, vaccination and deworming were collected from dogs and cats owners. All dogs and cats used in this study showed asymptomatic of parasitic diseases. For microscopic examination, samples were processed by the sucrose flotation method [14] and formalin − ethyl acetate concentration technique (FECT) [1] at the Parasitology laboratory, Faculty of Medical Science, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok, Thailand. Helminth eggs were examined under a microscope at 10 × 10 or 10 × 40 magnifications.

Identification of hookworm species: DNA was extracted from 2 g of fecal samples using the following steps. Firstly, fecal samples were homogenized in the sucrose solution and centrifuged at 500 g for 10 min. Then, supernatant was harvested and diluted with water and centrifuged again at 2,500 g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was discarded, and 100 µl lysis buffer (600 mM EDTA, 1.3% (v/v) N-lauroylsarcosine and 2mg/ml Proteinase K) [38] was added to the pellet and subjected to 3–5 cycles of freezing at −80°C for 20 min and thawing at 98°C for 1 hr in order to break hookworm eggs. Thereafter, 400 µl CTAB buffer (2% (w/v) cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide, 1.4 M NaCl, 0.2% (v/v) mercaptoethanol, 20 mM EDTA and 100 mM Tris (hydroxymethyl) aminomethane) [38] was added to the samples and incubated at 70°C for 1 hr. Then, phenol/chloroform extraction method was used to extract and purify DNA. The purified DNA was used for PCR with hookworm specific primers, RTHW1F (5′-GATGAGCATTGCWTGAATGCCG-3′) and RTHW1R (5′-GCAAGTRCCGTTCGACAAACAG-3′) [33]. PCR products were then purified and sequenced. Cycle sequencing reactions were performed using a BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit version 3.1 (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, U.K.), and each sample was analyzed with an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). The obtained sequences were aligned and compared to published sequences of hookworm.

Confirmation of O. viverrini infection: 2 g of fecal samples with Opisthorchis-like egg were washed with the phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-ethyl acetate concentration technique [6]. Then, 200 microliters of sediment of each purified positive fecal samples were processed according to manufacturer’s instruction of QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany). The purified DNA was used for PCR amplification with O. viverrini specific primers, OV-6F (5′-CTGAATCTCTCGTTTGT TCA-3′) and OV-6R (5′-GTTCCAGGTGAGTCTCTCTA-3′) [36].

RESULTS

Out of 197 dog fecal samples examined by microscopy, 79 (40.1%) samples were positive for zoonotic significant gastrointestinal helminths. Among 197 samples, 57 (28.9%) were infected by one kind of helminth, while 22 (11.2%) were infected by a mixture of helminths (Table 1). The helminth infections found in samples were hookworms (21.3%), Spirometra spp. (15.2%), Taenia spp. (7.1%), Toxocara (3.6%), O. viverrini (3.0%) and Strongyloides spp. (1.5%) (Table 2 and Fig. 2A). Hookworms were the most prevalent, followed by Spirometra spp. Co-infections of hookworms or Spirometra spp. with other zoonotic helminth were common. Co-infection of hookworms and Spirometra spp. was the most prevalent (Table 3).

Table 1. Gastrointestinal parasitic infection in dogs and cats in lower Northern Thailand.

Parasitic infection No. (%) positive

Dog (n=197) Cat (n=180)
Total infection 79 (40.1) 61 (33.9)
Infection with single species 57 (28.9) 49 (27.2)
Mixed infection 22 (11.2) 12 (6.7)

Table 2. The prevalence (%) of infection of helminth parasite in 197 dogs and 180 cats from lower Northern Thailand.

Helminth parasite No. (%) positive

Dog Cat
Hookworms 42 (21.3) 25 (13.9)
Spirometra 30 (15.2) 36 (20.0)
Taenia 14 (7.1) 0 (0.0)
Toxocara 7 (3.6) 4 (2.2)
O. viverrini 6 (3.0) 6 (3.3)
Strongyloides 3 (1.5) 0 (0.0)
Trichuris 0 (0.0) 2 (0.6)

Fig.2.

Fig.2.

Microscopic images of parasitic eggs found in dog fecal samples (A) which were hookworm (a), Spirometra (b), Taenia (c) and Toxocara (d), and in cat fecal samples (B) which were Spirometra (a), hookworm (b), Opisthorchis viverrini (c) and Toxocara (d).

Table 3. The prevalence (%) of mixed infection of helminth parasite in 197 dgos and 180 cats from the lower Northern Thailand.

Mixed infection No. (%) mixed infection

Dog Cat
Hookworms/Spirometra 10 (5.1) 6 (3.3)
Hookworms/Toxocara 2 (1.0) 1 (0.6)
Hookworms/Ascaris 2 (1.0) 0 (0.0)
Hookworm/O. viverrini 2 (1.0) 0 (0.0)
Spirometra/Taenia 2 (1.0) 0 (0.0)
Spirometra/O. viverrini 2 (1.0) 3 (1.7)
Spirometra/Toxocara 1 (0.5) 2 (1.1)
Toxocara/O. viverrini 1 (0.5) 0 (0.0)

Out of 180 cat fecal samples examined microscopically, 61 (33.9%) cats were positive for helminth infection. Among all positive samples, 49 (27.2%) samples had infection from one kind of helminth, while 12 (6.7%) samples had mixed infections (Table 1). The helminths found were Spirometra spp. (20.0%), hookworms (13.9%), Toxocara cati (2.2%), O. viverrini (3.3%) and Trichuris spp. (0.6%) (Table 2 and Fig. 2B). Spirometra spp. were the most prevalent helminth. Co-infection of Spirometra spp. or hookworms with other helminths was common. Mixed infection of Spirometra spp. and hookworms was also the most common in cats (Table 3).

Molecular identification of hookworm infection in dog using PCR amplification with hookworm-specific primers yielded a specific PCR product size at 380 bp in 28 (14.2%) dog fecal samples. DNA sequences were successfully obtained from all 28 PCR positive samples. Sequences revealed 100% identity to A. ceylanicum strain GD-M55 (KF279136) in 23 (82.1%) samples. Another 5 (17.9%) samples showed 100% identity to A. caninum GD-M45 (KC755026) (Table 4).

Table 4. Identification of hookworm infections from 197 dogs and 180 cats using floatation, PCR and sequencing techniques.

Technique/hookworm species Positivity (%)

Dogs Cats
Flotation technique 21.3 13.9
PCR 14.2 13.9
Sequencing 14.2 13.9
Hookworm species
Ancylostoma ceylanicum GD-M55 82.1 84
Ancylostoma caninum GD-M45 17.9 4
A. ceylanicum GD- M55 and A. ceylanicum GD-M76 0 12

For the cat samples, the PCR amplification with hookworm specific primers revealed positivity in 25 (13.9%) samples. DNA sequences were obtained from all 25 samples. BLAST results showed that 21 (84.0%) samples were 100% identity to A. ceylanicum strain GD-M55 and 1 (4.0%) sample was 100% identity to A. caninum strain GD-M45. Three (12.0%) samples were infected with both A. ceylanicum strain GD-M55 and A. ceylanicum GD-M76 (Table 4).

The PCR analysis confirmed O. viverrini infection in 6 dog fecal samples and 6 cat fecal samples.

DISCUSSION

Dogs and cats are important reservoir hosts of various zoonotic helminths [7, 22, 24], many of which cause serious public health problems. Here, we reported the prevalence of zoonotic intestinal helminths in lower Northern Thailand as 40.1% (79/197) in dogs and 33.9% (61/180) in cats, respectively. Zoonotic helminths found included hookworms, Spirometra spp., Toxocara, O. viverrini, Taenia spp., Strongyloides and Trichuris [29, 34].

Among zoonotic helminth infections in dogs in the lower Northern area of Thailand, hookworms were the most prevalent helminth, and Spirometra was the second most prevalent. Our results confirmed that hookworm infection in dogs is common in Thailand [12, 33]. The high prevalence of hookworm infections in dogs can contribute to the occurrence of zoonotic ancylostomiasis in human [11].

Zoonotic helminth infections in cats were different from dogs. Spirometra was the most prevalent, while hookworms were the second most prevalent helminth. High rates of Spirometra infection might be a reflection of the fact that most cats roam freely and had access to small prey as a food source. High infection rates of Spirometra spp. in cats might indicate a high infection rate of plocercoid and plerocercoid in intermediate hosts in the area. The infection of Spirometra spp. in cats and dogs can lead to a high risk of sparganosis in humans who have the habit of eating undercooked meat [2, 4]. However, human sparganosis in Thailand is rare. In the period 1943–2010, only 53 cases had been reported [2, 4].

Co-infections of hookworms and Spirometra spp. were common in both dogs and cats. This finding indicated a higher risk level in the area of zoonotic diseases caused by the two parasites. However, zoonotic diseases caused by hookworms are more prevalent in Thailand [2, 11].

The larva migrans can also be caused by Toxocara [23] which were also found in feces of dogs and cats examined in this survey. Human can be infected by the ingestion of embryonated eggs that could be present in soil contaminated with dog or cat feces [12]. However, unlike hookworms and Spirometra spp., infection of Toxocara spp. in cats and dogs was low. This finding may be attributed to the hot climate of the area where fecal samples were collected. In summer, the lower Northern area is very dry and hot, sunlight is very strong, and the temperature reaches 40°C. Several studies reported that incubation of Toxocara egg at 37°C stops embryonation of the parasite egg [8, 21]. Possibly, hot and dry climate in the lower Northern area kills infective stage of Toxocara spp. which lead to low infection rate of the parasite in cats and dogs in the area.

Significant zoonotic hookworms include A. ceylanicum, A. braziliensis and A. caninum [10, 11, 25]. Molecular analysis revealed that the most prevalent hookworm (over 80%) found in dogs and cats in the lower Northern area was A. ceylanicum. A. ceylanicum is highly prevalent in many areas in Asian countries [29, 33, 34] and is known to produce potent infections in humans. A. ceylanicum is the second most common hookworm infection in humans that can lead to anemia [10, 11].

Zoonotic hookworm, A. caninum, was found to have low infection rates in both dogs and cats. Similar to other areas, prevalence of A. caninum was lower than that of A. ceylanicum [33, 34]. Although its infection rate was low, this hookworm can result in eosinophilic enteritis and chronic abdominal pain in human [5, 26]. Other zoonotic hookworm, such as A. braziliensis, was not found in this area.

O. viverrini is a significant zoonotic infection in Thailand [30]. Microscopic examination for fecal eggs leads to misdiagnosis of O. viverrini egg [37]. Therefore, in this study, molecular analysis was applied to identify O. viverrini infection in both cats and dogs. PCR analysis with O. viverrini specific primers [36] confirmed O. viverrini infection in dogs and cats in the lower Northern area. The infection rate was relatively less than the rate in the Northeastern region where O. viverrini infection is highly prevalent [30]. However, it is important to emphasize that over 50% of inhabitants in these communities originally migrated from the Northeastern area (pumidonming, interview). This could be the reason behind the existence of O. viverrini infection in dogs and cats in the studied area. Dogs and cats could potentially be infected through ingestion of raw or undercooked cyprinoid fish which is infected with O. viverrini metacercariae. The infection in dogs and cats can increase the occurrence of infected snails and cyprinoid fish which consequently increase the incidence of O. viverrini infection in humans.

PCR and sequencing were used for detection and identification of parasites in various specimens with high sensitivity and specificity [33, 36]. In our survey, molecular analysis was applied for two significant helminths infection, hookworms and O. viverrini. Morphological identification of hookworm larvae or eggs to species is difficult, and molecular identification provides great results in this regard [34]. PCR amplification with O. viverrini specific primers (OV-F and OV-R) was used to confirm O. viverrini infection. The primers are highly specific to O. viverrini. No false-positive amplification was observed when testing with DNA of min intestinal flukes, such as Centrocestus spp. and Haplorchis taichui or other trematode parasites, such as Fasciola gigantica and Paragonimus heterotremus [13, 36]. However, inhibitors present in fecal samples can inhibit PCR reaction as shown in many epidemiological studies including our study where PCR analysis failed to yield positive results in some microscopic positive samples [29, 31].

Dogs and cats with low intensity of helminth infection are often asymptomatic, however, adult worms still produce eggs, being shed out with feces. Dogs and cats in the lower Northern area roam around freely. Free roaming of infected cats and dogs causes contamination of zoonotic parasites to the environment [5, 35].

In conclusion, we report the prevalence of gastrointestinal helminths of zoonotic significance in dogs and cats in lower Northern Thailand. Variable helminths were detected, namely hookworms, Spirometra spp., Taenia spp., Toxocara spp., O. viverrini, Strongyloides spp. and Trichuris spp. Hookworm infections included A. ceylanicum and A. caninum, and A. ceylanicum was the most prevalent hookworm found in dogs and cats in the lower Northern area of Thailand.

The zoonotic helminth infections in dogs and cats in the lower Northern Thailand are considered neglected, because relatively little attention has been devoted to their surveillance, prevention and treatment.

Acknowledgments

The authors also wish to acknowledge the assistance of Dr. Karthik Chandrasekaran, Mr. Barry Gale and Professor Gavin Reynolds for correcting the manuscript. This research was funded by National Research Council of Thailand grant number R2557B008 and Obihiro University of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Japan.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Anamnart W., Intapan P. M., Maleewong W.2013. Modified formalin-ether concentration technique for diagnosis of human strongyloidiasis. Korean J. Parasitol. 51: 743–745. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2013.51.6.743 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Anantaphruti M. T., Nawa Y., Vanvanitchai Y.2011. Human sparganosis in Thailand: an overview. Acta Trop. 118: 171–176. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2011.03.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Aunpromma S., Tangkawattana P., Papirom P., Kanjampa P., Tesana S., Sripa B., Tangkawattana S.2012. High prevalence of Opisthorchis viverrini infection in reservoir hosts in four districts of Khon Kaen Province, an opisthorchiasis endemic area of Thailand. Parasitol. Int. 61: 60–64. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2011.08.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boonyasiri A., Cheunsuchon P., Suputtamongkol Y., Yamasaki H., Sanpool O., Maleewong W., Intapan P. M.2014. Nine human sparganosis cases in Thailand with molecular identification of causative parasite species. Am. J. Trop. Med. Hyg. 91: 389–393. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.14-0178 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bowman D. D., Montgomery S. P., Zajac A. M., Eberhard M. L., Kazacos K. R.2010. Hookworms of dogs and cats as agents of cutaneous larva migrans. Trends Parasitol. 26: 162–167. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2010.01.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Duenngai K., Sithithaworn P., Rudrappa U. K., Iddya K., Laha T., Stensvold C. R., Strandgaard H., Johansen M. V.2008. Improvement of PCR for detection of Opisthorchis viverrini DNA in human stool samples. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46: 366–368. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01323-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fang F., Li J., Huang T., Guillot J., Huang W.2015. Zoonotic helminths parasites in the digestive tract of feral dogs and cats in Guangxi, China. BMC Vet. Res. 11: 211. doi: 10.1186/s12917-015-0521-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gamboa M. I.2005. Effects of temperature and humidity on the development of eggs of Toxocara canis under laboratory conditions. J. Helminthol. 79: 327–331. doi: 10.1079/JOH2005287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Giboda M., Ditrich O., Scholz T., Viengsay T., Bouaphanh S.1991. Human Opisthorchis and Haplorchis infections in Laos. Trans. R. Soc. Trop. Med. Hyg. 85: 538–540. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(91)90248-W [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hsu Y. C., Lin J. T.2012. Images in clinical medicine. Intestinal infestation with Ancylostoma ceylanicum. N. Engl. J. Med. 366: e20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMicm1101717 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Inpankaew T., Schär F., Dalsgaard A., Khieu V., Chimnoi W., Chhoun C., Sok D., Marti H., Muth S., Odermatt P., Traub R. J.2014. High prevalence of Ancylostoma ceylanicum hookworm infections in humans, Cambodia, 2012. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20: 976–982. doi: 10.3201/eid2006.131770 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Inpankaew T., Traub R., Thompson R. C., Sukthana Y.2007. Canine parasitic zoonoses in Bangkok temples. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 38: 247–255. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Intapan P. M., Thanchomnang T., Lulitanond V., Pongsaskulchoti P., Maleewong W.2008. Detection of Opisthorchis viverrini in infected bithynid snails by real-time fluorescence resonance energy transfer PCR-based method and melting curve analysis. Parasitol. Res. 103: 649–655. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1026-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ito S.1980. Modified Wisconsin sugar centrifugal-flotation technique for nematode eggs in bovine feces. J. Jpn. Vet. Med. Assoc. 33: 424–429. doi: 10.12935/jvma1951.33.424 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jex A. R., Lim Y. A., Bethony J. M., Hotez P. J., Young N. D., Gasser R. B.2011. Soil-transmitted helminths of humans in Southeast Asia--towards integrated control. Adv. Parasitol. 74: 231–265. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-385897-9.00004-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jongsuksuntigul P., Imsomboon T.2003. Opisthorchiasis control in Thailand. Acta Trop. 88: 229–232. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2003.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liu Q., Li M. W., Wang Z. D., Zhao G. H., Zhu X. Q.2015. Human sparganosis, a neglected food borne zoonosis. Lancet Infect. Dis. 15: 1226–1235. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00133-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lovis L., Mak T. K., Phongluxa K., Soukhathammavong P., Sayasone S., Akkhavong K., Odermatt P., Keiser J., Felger I.2009. PCR Diagnosis of Opisthorchis viverrini and Haplorchis taichui Infections in a Lao Community in an area of endemicity and comparison of diagnostic methods for parasitological field surveys. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47: 1517–1523. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02011-08 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ng-Nguyen D., Hii S. F., Nguyen V. A., Van Nguyen T., Van Nguyen D., Traub R. J.2015. Re-evaluation of the species of hookworms infecting dogs in Central Vietnam. Parasit. Vectors 8: 401. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1015-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Nijsse R., Mughini-Gras L., Wagenaar J. A., Franssen F., Ploeger H. W.2015. Environmental contamination with Toxocara eggs: a quantitative approach to estimate the relative contributions of dogs, cats and foxes, and to assess the efficacy of advised interventions in dogs. Parasit. Vectors 8: 397. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-1009-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Okoshi S., Usui M.1968. Experimental studies on Toxascaris leonina. IV. Development of eggs of three ascarids, T. leonina, Toxocara canis and Toxocara cati, in dogs and cats. Nippon Juigaku Zasshi 30: 29–38. doi: 10.1292/jvms1939.30.29 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Oliveira-Arbex A. P., David E. B., Oliveira-Sequeira T. C., Katagiri S., Coradi S. T., Guimarães S.2016. Molecular identification of Ancylostoma species from dogs and an assessment of zoonotic risk in low-income households, São Paulo State, Brazil. J. Helminthol. 11: 1–6. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X15001145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ortega-Pacheco A., Torres-Acosta J. F., Alzina-López A., Gutiérrez-Blanco E., Bolio-González M. E., Aguilar-Caballero A. J., Rodríguez-Vivas R. I., Gutiérrez-Ruiz E., Acosta-Viana K. Y., Guzmán-Marín E., Rosado-Aguilar A., Jiménez-Coello M.2015. Parasitic zoonoses in humans and their dogs from a rural community of tropical Mexico. J. Trop. Med. 2015: 481086. doi: 10.1155/2015/481086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Overgaauw P. A., van Zutphen L., Hoek D., Yaya F. O., Roelfsema J., Pinelli E., van Knapen F., Kortbeek L. M.2009. Zoonotic parasites in fecal samples and fur from dogs and cats in The Netherlands. Vet. Parasitol. 163: 115–122. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.03.044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Phosuk I., Intapan P. M., Thanchomnang T., Sanpool O., Janwan P., Laummaunwai P., Aamnart W., Morakote N., Maleewong W.2013. Molecular detection of Ancylostoma duodenale, Ancylostoma ceylanicum, and Necator americanus in humans in northeastern and southern Thailand. Korean J. Parasitol. 51: 747–749. doi: 10.3347/kjp.2013.51.6.747 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Prociv P., Croese J.1996. Human enteric infection with Ancylostoma caninum: hookworms reappraised in the light of a “new” zoonosis. Acta Trop. 62: 23–44. doi: 10.1016/S0001-706X(96)00016-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Radomyos B., Wongsaroj T., Wilairatana P., Radomyos P., Praevanich R., Meesomboon V., Jongsuksuntikul P.1998. Opisthorchiasis and intestinal fluke infections in northern Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 29: 123–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rojekittikhun W., Chaisiri K., Mahittikorn A., Pubampen S., Sa-Nguankiat S., Kusolsuk T., Maipanich W., Udonsom R., Mori H.2014. Gastrointestinal parasites of dogs and cats in a refuge in Nakhon Nayok, Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 45: 31–39. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Schär F., Inpankaew T., Traub R. J., Khieu V., Dalsgaard A., Chimnoi W., Chhoun C., Sok D., Marti H., Muth S., Odermatt P.2014. The prevalence and diversity of intestinal parasitic infections in humans and domestic animals in a rural Cambodian village. Parasitol. Int. 63: 597–603. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2014.03.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sithithaworn P., Andrews R. H., Nguyen V. D., Wongsaroj T., Sinuon M., Odermatt P., Nawa Y., Liang S., Brindley P. J., Sripa B.2012. The current status of opisthorchiasis and clonorchiasis in the Mekong Basin. Parasitol. Int. 61: 10–16. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2011.08.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Stensvold C. R., Saijuntha W., Sithithaworn P., Wongratanacheewin S., Strandgaard H., Ornbjerg N., Johansen M. V.2006. Evaluation of PCR based coprodiagnosis of human opisthorchiasis. Acta Trop. 97: 26–30. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2005.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tesana S., Srisawangwonk T., Kaewkes S., Sithithaworn P., Kanla P., Arunyanart C.1991. Eggshell morphology of the small eggs of human trematodes in Thailand. Southeast Asian J. Trop. Med. Public Health 22: 631–636. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Traub R. J., Inpankaew T., Sutthikornchai C., Sukthana Y., Thompson R. C.2008. PCR-based coprodiagnostic tools reveal dogs as reservoirs of zoonotic ancylostomiasis caused by Ancylostoma ceylanicum in temple communities in Bangkok. Vet. Parasitol. 155: 67–73. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.05.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Traub R. J., Pednekar R. P., Cuttell L., Porter R. B., Abd Megat Rani P. A., Gatne M. L.2014. The prevalence and distribution of gastrointestinal parasites of stray and refuge dogs in four locations in India. Vet. Parasitol. 205: 233–238. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.06.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wiwanitkit V., Waenlor W.2004. The frequency rate of Toxocara species contamination in soil samples from public yards in a urban area “Payathai”, Bangkok, Thailand. Rev. Inst. Med. Trop. Sao Paulo 46: 113–114. doi: 10.1590/S0036-46652004000200011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wongratanacheewin S., Pumidonming W., Sermswan R. W., Pipitgool V., Maleewong W.2002. Detection of Opisthorchis viverrini in human stool specimens by PCR. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40: 3879–3880. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.10.3879-3880.2002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Wongsawad C., Phalee A., Noikong W., Chuboon S., Nithikathkul C.2012. Co-infection with Opisthorchis viverrini and Haplorchis taichui detected by human fecal examination in Chomtong district, Chiang Mai Province, Thailand. Parasitol. Int. 61: 56–59. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2011.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zhao X., Duszynski D. W., Loker E. S.2001. A simple method of DNA extraction for Eimeria species. J. Microbiol. Methods 44: 131–137. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(00)00249-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Veterinary Medical Science are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society of Veterinary Science

RESOURCES