Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2017 Jan 10;8(1):e02058-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02058-16

The Assimilation of Diazotroph-Derived Nitrogen by Scleractinian Corals Depends on Their Metabolic Status

Vanessa N Bednarz a,, Renaud Grover a, Jean-François Maguer b, Maoz Fine c,d, Christine Ferrier-Pagès a
Editor: Douglas G Caponee
PMCID: PMC5241398  PMID: 28074021

ABSTRACT

Tropical corals are associated with a diverse community of dinitrogen (N2)-fixing prokaryotes (diazotrophs) providing the coral an additional source of bioavailable nitrogen (N) in oligotrophic waters. The overall activity of these diazotrophs changes depending on the current environmental conditions, but to what extent it affects the assimilation of diazotroph-derived N (DDN) by corals is still unknown. Here, in a series of 15N2 tracer experiments, we directly quantified DDN assimilation by scleractinian corals from the Red Sea exposed to different environmental conditions. We show that DDN assimilation strongly varied with the corals’ metabolic status or with phosphate availability in the water. The very autotrophic shallow-water (~5 m) corals showed low or no DDN assimilation, which significantly increased under elevated phosphate availability (3 µM). Corals that depended more on heterotrophy (i.e., bleached and deep-water [~45 m] corals) assimilated significantly more DDN, which contributed up to 15% of the corals’ N demand (compared to 1% in shallow corals). Furthermore, we demonstrate that a substantial part of the DDN assimilated by deep corals was likely obtained from heterotrophic feeding on fixed N compounds and/or diazotrophic cells in the mucus. Conversely, in shallow corals, the net release of mucus, rich in organic carbon compounds, likely enhanced diazotroph abundance and activity and thereby the release of fixed N to the pelagic and benthic reef community. Overall, our results suggest that DDN assimilation by corals varies according to the environmental conditions and is likely linked to the capacity of the coral to acquire nutrients from seawater.

IMPORTANCE

Tropical corals are associated with specialized bacteria (i.e., diazotrophs) able to transform dinitrogen (N2) gas into a bioavailable form of nitrogen, but how much of this diazotroph-derived nitrogen (DDN) is assimilated by corals under different environmental conditions is still unknown. Here, we used 15N2 labeling to trace the fate of DDN within the coral symbiosis. We show that DDN is assimilated by both the animal host and the endosymbiotic algae. In addition, the amount of assimilated DDN was significantly greater in mesophotic, bleached, or phosphorus-enriched corals than in surface corals, which almost did not take up this nitrogen form. DDN can thus be of particular importance for the nutrient budget of corals whenever they are limited by the availability of other forms of dissolved nutrients.

INTRODUCTION

Corals are multipartite symbiotic organisms (holobionts) formed by the coral host and a diverse microbiota consisting of endosymbiotic dinoflagellates, endolithic algae, bacteria, archaea, fungi, and viruses (1, 2). The associated microbial community is specific to both the coral species and the microhabitat within the coral host (i.e., surface mucus layer, coral tissue, and coral skeleton); this highly diverse coral microbiome provides important services to the coral holobiont, such as nutrient acquisition and recycling or antimicrobial defense, among many others (35).

Nutrient, especially nitrogen (N), acquisition is of particular importance for corals thriving in oligotrophic reef waters, where N availability often limits primary productivity (6). Corals have therefore evolved an efficient internal recycling of N between the coral host and its dinoflagellate symbionts (7). Model calculations suggest that the symbiotic dinoflagellates can acquire up to 80% of their N from the animal host, indicating that recycling of the internal N pool plays a key role in holobiont functioning (8). Nevertheless, corals also require external N resources to match carbon (C) uptake and sustain net growth, which is gained via heterotrophic consumption of plankton by the coral host (9, 10), via dissolved inorganic N uptake by the dinoflagellates (11), as well as via the association with dinitrogen (N2)-fixing microbes (diazotrophs). A wide variety of diazotrophs has been discovered within the surface mucus layer, or the coral tissue, and skeleton, each harboring a distinct diazotrophic community (12, 13). Studies that used the natural δ15N signature of coral tissue demonstrated qualitatively that diazotroph-derived N (DDN) was assimilated by the coral when the δ15N signature of the coral was close to the δ15N value (0‰) of atmospheric N2 (14, 15). Other studies have quantitatively measured the N2 fixation activity of coral-associated diazotrophs (1522). Most of these studies used the acetylene reduction assay that measures the nitrogenase activity of diazotrophs indirectly (1519, 21). However, this approach does not provide quantitative insight into the net assimilation of DDN by the coral host or dinoflagellates. Instead, the use of labeled 15N2 gas measures net N2 fixation directly, thus allowing tracing of the fate and assimilation of DDN within the different coral compartments. So far, only two studies have applied the 15N2 technique to tropical scleractinian coral species (22, 23). The first study, which used the gas bubble method to enrich seawater with 15N2, found 15N enrichment only in the suspended particles of the incubation medium (i.e., particles released by the coral) and not within the coral tissue or dinoflagellates (22). Heterotrophic diazotrophs were thus mainly active in the coral-surrounding seawater, likely benefiting from the high availability of organic C contained in the mucus and released by corals during incubation (24). On the contrary, the second study used the 15N2-enriched seawater addition method and was able to trace DDN assimilation by the dinoflagellates (23). It also experimentally showed that corals could obtain DDN through the ingestion (heterotrophic feeding) of planktonic diazotrophs. The difference between the two studies might be due to the different methods used (15N2 gas bubble versus 15N2-enriched seawater addition), as it was suggested that the gas bubble method could, in some cases, underestimate N2 fixation rates (25, 26). In addition, other environmental factors, such as the diazotroph community composition, the corals’ metabolic status, or the N availability in the environment, may have also been involved.

The corals’ metabolic status (i.e., autotrophic, heterotrophic) is one of the main factors affecting both the rates of mucus release and the rates of organic particle uptake from the surrounding seawater (27). For example, heterotrophy will be high when the autotrophic C input by the symbiotic dinoflagellates is insufficient (i.e., bleached or deep corals [28, 29]). This might subsequently influence the coral’s DDN assimilation since heterotrophy is also linked to the predation of diazotroph particles (23). Both the corals’ metabolic status and the overall activity of coral-associated diazotrophs strongly depend on the current environmental conditions (17, 19, 29, 30), but to the best of our knowledge, no study has directly quantified the assimilation of DDN by corals under different environmental conditions so far. Furthermore, as coral mucus contains a high number of diazotrophs and corals are known to take up diazotrophs from the surrounding seawater (23, 31), the specific role of mucus in providing new bioavailable N to the coral host under different environmental conditions requires further investigation.

Therefore, the present study applied the 15N2-enriched seawater addition method in a series of incubation experiments with scleractinian corals from the northern Red Sea to better understand the importance of DDN assimilation for the coral holobiont. The aims were (i) to quantify DDN assimilation by corals (i.e., animal tissue and dinoflagellates) with different metabolic statuses, i.e., exposed to different environmental conditions (i.e., shallow, deep, bleached, and phosphate-enriched corals) and (ii) to investigate mucus-associated net N2 fixation and its potential contribution to the DDN assimilation by corals.

RESULTS

N2 fixation by suspended particles.

All 15N2 incubation experiments resulted in a significant 15N excess enrichment of the suspended particles compared to control samples, to which no 15N tracer was added (Table 1). N2 fixation by suspended particles (ng N liter−1 h−1, Fig. 1) was significantly different among the coral, mucus, and unfiltered seawater incubations (permutational multivariate analysis of variance [PERMANOVA]: pseudo-F5,27 = 42.11, Monte Carlo [MC] test P < 0.001). The lowest N2 fixation rates were observed in the unfiltered seawater control containing the natural community of planktonic diazotrophs (9.80 ± 1.90 ng N liter−1 h−1). As a reminder, in all of the other incubations, the natural community of planktonic diazotrophs was excluded by seawater filtration before the incubations and only the activity of diazotrophs that were associated with the coral mucus or had been expelled by the coral was measured. In this case, suspended particles released during coral incubations [except those with Stylophora pistillata (deep); 26.29 ± 8.96 ng N liter−1 h−1; pairwise MC tests, P > 0.05] and during mucus incubations (deep or shallow) showed significantly enhanced N2 fixation rates compared to natural planktonic diazotrophs of the unfiltered seawater control (pairwise MC tests, P < 0.05, Fig. 1). Highest N2 fixation by suspended particles was observed after incubation of S. pistillata (bleached) with 324.64 ± 64.55 ng N liter−1 h−1. The separate comparison of Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow) revealed significant differences as well (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F1,8 = 19.08, P [MC] = 0.006).

TABLE 1 .

15N excess enrichment of suspended particles, animal tissue, and dinoflagellates exposed to different environmental conditionsa

Incubated sample 15N excess enrichment (atom% 15Nexcess)
Suspended particles Animal tissue Dinoflagellates
Coral
 Alveopora species (shallow) 0.121 ± 0.017b 0.0002 ± 0.0002 0.0017 ± 0.0002
 S. pistillata (shallow) 0.349 ± 0.069b 0.0002 ± 0.0001 0.0014 ± 0.0002
 S. pistillata (72 h) 0.315 ± 0.058b 0.0020 ± 0.0001b 0.0032 ± 0.0001b
 S. pistillata (phosphate) n.s.c 0.0021 ± 0.0001b 0.0043 ± 0.0002b
 S. pistillata (bleached) 0.245 ± 0.105b 0.0033 ± 0.0003b 0.0059 ± 0.0032b
 S. pistillata (deep) 0.083 ± 0.034b 0.0043 ± 0.0003b 0.0069 ± 0.0006b
Mucus
    Mucus (shallow) 0.072 ± 0.008b
    Mucus (deep) 0.058 ± 0.003b
Unfiltered seawater 0.127 ± 0.009b
a

The data are mean ± SE. The 15N excess enrichment was calculated from the difference in atom% 15N between control samples (not exposed to 15N2) and samples after 15N2 exposure.

b

Significant enrichment (at least three times as great as the standard deviation of control samples).

c

n.s., not sampled.

FIG 1 .

FIG 1 

N2 fixation by suspended particles (ng N liter−1 h−1; mean ± SE) after incubation of Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow, bleached, and deep) coral colonies (black bars), of coral mucus collected from shallow and deep S. pistillata (gray bars), and of unfiltered seawater samples (white bar). Different letters (a to d) above the bars indicate significant differences between the incubations (one-factor PERMANOVA with pairwise MC tests; significance level, P < 0.05). A separate PERMANOVA was conducted to compare N2 fixation by suspended particles between Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow) incubations.

When N2 fixation by suspended particles was normalized to the coral surface area (ng N cm−2 h−1, Fig. 2A), it showed significant differences between the S. pistillata incubations (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F3,15 = 63.62, P [MC] < 0.001), with the highest rates during the S. pistillata (bleached) incubation and the lowest during the S. pistillata (deep) incubation. Also the comparison of Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow) revealed significant differences (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F1,8 = 19.08, P [MC] = 0.003). Overall, both normalizations gave the same trends.

FIG 2 .

FIG 2 

N2 fixation by suspended particles (A), as well as DDN assimilation by animal tissue (B) and dinoflagellates (C) after incubation of Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow, 72 h, phosphate, bleached, and deep) coral colonies (ng N cm−2 h−1; mean ± SE). The suspended particles from the S. pistillata (phosphate) incubation were not sampled (n.s.) for analysis. Different letters (a to d) above the bars indicate significant differences between the S. pistillata incubations (one-factor PERMANOVAs with pairwise MC tests; significance level, P < 0.05). A separate PERMANOVA was conducted to compare N2 fixation by suspended particles between Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow) corals (no significant 15N excess enrichment, and thus no DDN assimilation, was detected in the animal tissue and dinoflagellates of these corals).

DDN assimilation in coral tissue and dinoflagellates.

The 15N excess enrichment of the dinoflagellates always exceeded that of the animal tissue, but in both coral compartments, it was 10- to 100-fold lower than the enrichment of the suspended particles (Table 1). Compared to the coral controls (no 15N2 exposure), we detected a significant 15N excess enrichment of the coral tissue and dinoflagellates in all 15N2 incubation experiments, except for Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow). Although we detected no 15N excess enrichment of S. pistillata (shallow) after an incubation period of 24 h, the animal tissue and dinoflagellates were significantly enriched after repeated incubation of the corals in 15N2-enriched seawater over 3 consecutive days [S. pistillata (72 h)], indicating slow but continuous DDN assimilation by the corals. Taking the N content of the animal tissue and dinoflagellates into account, the net DDN assimilation into the two coral compartments was calculated (ng N cm−2 h−1). This showed significant differences in DDN assimilation by the corals exposed to different environmental conditions for both the tissue (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F4,18 = 79.08, P [MC] < 0.001, Fig. 2B) and the dinoflagellates (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F4,20 = 19.64, P [MC] < 0.001, Fig. 2C). A significant assimilation in the animal tissue and dinoflagellates was detected in all corals except again in Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow), which showed no 15N excess enrichment. S. pistillata incubated for 72 h presented the lowest DDN assimilation, in both the animal tissue and dinoflagellates. Compared to S. pistillata (72 h), the assimilation significantly increased in the animal tissue of S. pistillata (phosphate), S. pistillata (bleached), and S. pistillata (deep), as well as in the dinoflagellates of S. pistillata (phosphate) and S. pistillata (deep). The highest assimilation was detected in the dinoflagellates of S. pistillata (deep).

Total net N2 fixation.

The total net N2 fixation of the coral incubations represents the sum of N2 fixation by suspended particles (normalized to the coral surface area; ng N cm−2 h−1) and the amount of DDN assimilated into the animal tissue and dinoflagellates. It was significantly different between the S. pistillata incubations (PERMANOVA: pseudo-F3,15 = 35.30, P [MC] < 0.001), with the lowest rates for the shallow S. pistillata corals incubated for either 24 h (5.14 ± 0.38 ng N cm−2 h−1) or 72 h (5.21 ± 0.08 ng N cm−2 h−1). Compared to these corals, the total N2 fixation was ~3- and ~2-fold higher in bleached S. pistillata (15.67 ± 0.38 ng N cm−2 h−1) and deep S. pistillata (10.44 ± 1.26 ng N cm−2 h−1), respectively. Furthermore, S. pistillata (72 h) assimilated only ~25% of the total fixed N into the animal tissue and dinoflagellates, while the assimilation increased to ~35% in S. pistillata (bleached) and up to ~90% in S. pistillata (deep).

DISCUSSION

Using 15N2 isotopic labeling, this study provides new insights into the assimilation of DDN by tropical corals exposed to different environmental conditions. The results indicate that DDN assimilation strongly varies with the autotrophic/heterotrophic status of the coral holobiont and with the phosphate availability in seawater, revealing an increased assimilation of DDN by corals that rely more on heterotrophy (i.e., bleached and deep corals) or are exposed to increased phosphate levels. Furthermore, we also demonstrate that mucus can be a major source of new N for the coral host (via feeding on diazotrophs contained in the mucus) and for the coral reef community (via the release of mucus, enriched in diazotrophs and fixed N compounds, to the surrounding seawater).

N2 fixation by suspended particles.

N2 fixation by suspended particles quantified in unfiltered seawater samples (containing the natural planktonic diazotroph community) averages 9.80 ± 1.90 ng N liter−1 h−1. This rate is higher than those previously measured in other 15N2-labeling studies (<1.1 ng N liter−1 h−1) for seawater of the northern Gulf of Aqaba (32, 33) but is in the range of those measured (10.8 ± 0.6 ng N liter−1 h−1) in coastal waters of New Caledonia (34). N2 fixation rates vary significantly with the abundance and activity of diazotrophs, themselves depending on environmental factors such as temperature, depth, light, and nutrient and trace metal availability (35). Here we show that N2 fixation rates in coral mucus samples are 12 times as high as those in unfiltered natural seawater (without mucus). This is likely due to a high diazotroph abundance in the mucus, which can be up to 400-fold higher than that in the surrounding seawater (31). Coral mucus is rich in dissolved organic C and inorganic phosphate, which is required for bacterial growth (36, 37). Once released into seawater, it stimulates the activity of both mucus- and seawater-associated bacteria by providing a suitable energy and nutrient source (3739). Thus, the increased N2 fixation observed in our mucus incubations could be the result of both the net release of diazotrophs into seawater and the stimulation of their activity. Our results are more pronounced than those of Camps et al. (31), who found only an insignificant 2-fold increase in N2 fixation when coral mucus was added to seawater samples. This may result from more active diazotrophs associated with the coral mucus in the present study. Those authors also measured up to 70-fold lower planktonic N2 fixation rates than previous measurements in the same area and season (34), also indicating that planktonic diazotrophs were less active.

During the coral incubations, suspended particles particularly released by the shallow corals showed up to 2-fold higher N2 fixation rates than suspended particles during the mucus-alone incubations (without corals). Corals continuously release approximately half of their photosynthetically acquired C as organic matter into the surrounding seawater (40, 41). This continuous supply of fresh mucus during coral incubations may have further increased the abundance of diazotrophs and stimulated their activity, while the availability of C was likely much reduced during the 24-h incubation with mucus alone. Mucus is indeed rapidly degraded (7 to 10% h−1) by bacteria (42), which, in particular, draw down its content in essential molecules such as phosphate and N (43). Our results are in agreement with the previous findings of Grover et al. (22), who also detected significant rates of N2 fixation by suspended particles released after the incubation of coral colonies, but the rates were much lower than those in the present study. The discrepancies between the two studies might be explained by the use of the 15N2 bubble rather than the 15N2-enriched seawater addition method, but also by seasonal variations (end of summer versus autumn) in diazotroph composition/activity, in the seawater nutrient concentrations, or in the N needs of the coral colonies, respectively. N2 fixation stimulated by corals is indeed highly variable on a seasonal scale, with the highest rates measured during the nutrient-depleted warm summer season (18, 19). We found the highest rates of N2 fixation by suspended particles after the incubation of S. pistillata (bleached). This may result from a higher abundance/activity of mucus-associated diazotrophs and may be linked to an increased release of labile mucus compounds by the coral (44). Interestingly, N2 fixation by suspended particles did not increase when a deep-water coral colony was incubated. Deep corals show reduced photosynthesis rates as a result of decreased light availability (45, 46). This may be accompanied by less C translocation from the symbiotic dinoflagellates to the host and reduced rates of organic matter release, as previously demonstrated in shallow-water corals exposed to reduced light levels (47, 48). Together, these processes may have affected the activity of diazotrophs, leading to decreased N2 fixation rates by suspended particles. In addition, deep corals rely more on heterotrophy because of reduced photosynthesis (46). Increased heterotrophic feeding on organic matter and on diazotrophs in the mucus may all have lowered the amount of fixed N in suspended particles. Also, we detected in deep corals a higher 15N enrichment in both the animal tissue and the dinoflagellates compared to shallow corals (see discussion below). This further supports the idea that deep corals may have assimilated more suspended particles (containing diazotrophs and fixed N) from seawater as a result of increased heterotrophic feeding that, in turn, lowered the amount of fixed N in the suspended particles. Overall, it was suggested that mucus-associated diazotrophs, once released into seawater, provide an additional source of N to the pelagic and benthic reef compartments (31). In addition, our results indicate that this input of N to the coral reef may strongly differ between shallow and deep reef habitats, in relation to the autotrophic or heterotrophic status of corals.

DDN assimilation by shallow-water corals.

All corals assimilated DDN into the animal tissue and the dinoflagellates, except for Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow). This confirms the first observations of Grover et al. (22) on tropical corals that, under some conditions, corals do not assimilate fixed N, although this additional N source would be particularly beneficial for shallow corals. Shallow corals receive photosynthetically derived C in excess and are thus N rather than C limited. To cope with this N deficiency, shallow corals have an efficient uptake of dissolved inorganic N from seawater that is energetically fueled by high light availability (49; L. Ezzat and C. Ferrier-Pagès, unpublished data). Although we observed no DDN assimilation by shallow corals after 24 h, S. pistillata (72 h) assimilated approximately 30% of the total fixed N into the animal tissue (0.97 ± 0.14 ng N cm−2 h−1) and dinoflagellates (0.39 ± 0.08 ng N cm−2 h−1) after an incubation period of 72 h. This suggests that assimilation of DDN by shallow corals is a slow process and that N2 fixation is associated with the released coral mucus rather than with the corals, at least in shallow reef environments. A recent study using the 15N2-enriched seawater addition method on shallow S. pistillata corals from New Caledonia detected DDN assimilation exclusively in the dinoflagellates (~330 ng N cm−2 h−1) with assimilation rates up to 3 orders of magnitude higher than in the present study (23). Although both studies used the same incubation technique, different 15N2 enrichment percentages (10% versus 20%) at the start of incubation and different incubation times (4 h versus 24 h) may have affected both the diazotrophic activity and the transfer of DDN into the different coral compartments. Dinoflagellates assimilate ammonium (the end product of N2 fixation) much faster than the coral host (50). Also, Kopp et al. (51) observed a time lag of 6 h between N assimilation by the dinoflagellates and subsequent N translocation to the coral host, suggesting that incubation periods of >4 h are necessary to detect DDN assimilation in the animal tissue. Also, S. pistillata from the Red Sea may be associated with a diazotroph community that is different from or less active than that of corals from New Caledonia. Last, N2 fixation, as well as the assimilation of dissolved inorganic N from the surrounding seawater, can strongly vary with the current environmental conditions (19, 49, 52) and can be a reason for the observed differences. In the following, we provide new insights into DDN assimilation by shallow-water corals exposed to increased phosphate levels in seawater, as well as after bleaching.

(i) Effect of phosphate availability.

Phosphate availability in seawater can positively affect the N2 fixation activity of planktonic diazotrophs (53). The high phosphorus demand for N2 fixation can be explained by the high ATP requirements for nitrogenase function, as previously demonstrated on plants (54, 55). This phosphorus constraint can occur either because fixation uniquely requires phosphorus-rich metabolites (5658) or because fixation allows fixers to grow and thus creates phosphorus demand (59). In addition, it was previously shown for S. pistillata that ammonium uptake from seawater increases up to 2.5-fold in the presence of 0.5 or 3.0 μM phosphate because one nutrient is limiting the use of the other (52). Since ammonium is the final product of N2 fixation, it may explain the up to 5-fold higher DDN assimilation by the coral holobiont when it is exposed to pulses of 3 μM phosphate. Also, N2 fixation can be significantly reduced under low-phosphate conditions (60), and background phosphate levels in the Gulf of Eilat are very low (<0.1 μM) throughout the year (32, 61). This low availability of phosphate in seawater may also explain the significant effect we found on N2 fixation rates upon exposure to 3 μM phosphate. We cannot calculate the total N2 fixation under increased phosphate availability because of the lack of quantification of 15N enrichment in the suspended particles released by the coral. However, total N2 fixation by S. pistillata (phosphate) likely increased since the amount of DDN assimilated in the animal tissue and dinoflagellate compartment of S. pistillata (phosphate) already exceeded the total N2 fixation by S. pistillata (shallow).

(ii) Effect of bleaching.

In the present study, incubations of bleached coral colonies revealed the highest total N2 fixation. The N2 fixation by suspended particles in this experiment was twice as high as the N2 fixation by suspended particles in the S. pistillata (shallow) incubation. Also, the DDN assimilation into tissue and dinoflagellates was greatly increased by S. pistillata (bleached) similarly to what was found for S. pistillata (phosphate). This enhanced activity of total (net) N2 fixation is similar to what was recently found for overall (gross) N2 fixation activities in bleached corals with the acetylene reduction assay (30). An increased seawater temperature also increases the abundance and diversity of coral-associated diazotrophs, shifting toward a more heat-resistant diazotroph community (62). Also, the bacterial community associated with the mucus undergoes drastic changes when exposed to heat stress (63). In the present study, 15N2 incubations with S. pistillata (bleached) were conducted after the heat stress period under normal temperature conditions. Thus, increased activity of the nitrogenase enzyme due to higher temperature can be excluded, but the corals most likely experienced a shift in the diazotrophic community that could be one reason for the increased N2 fixation rates seen (62). Furthermore, decreased photosynthesis rates in bleached corals lead to reduced O2 levels in the animal tissue and mucus layer. This, in turn, favors the activity of the O2-sensitive nitrogenase enzyme and can result in increased N2 fixation rates (64). Decreased photosynthesis reduces not only the O2 levels around the corals but also the autotrophic C supply to the host. This makes the coral more dependent on heterotrophic food sources, although the heterotrophic capacity (i.e., grazing) in bleached corals was also found to be impaired. A shift from catching larger high-energy prey items (i.e., nanoflagellates) to smaller low-energy prey (i.e., bacteria and picoflagellates) was observed in bleached S. pistillata because of the reduced energy required for catching nonmotile bacteria (65). Consequently, increased grazing on bacteria from the surrounding water may explain the higher DDN assimilation into the tissue of bleached corals observed here. Moreover, net organic matter fluxes in S. pistillata (bleached) changed from net uptake toward net release likely to reduce the effects of photoinhibition or cell membrane disruption (6567). Increased release of organic matter can provide additional energy to seawater and mucus-associated diazotrophs, subsequently stimulating their abundance and/or N2 fixation activity in the surrounding water. Overall, the results show not only that total N2 fixation increases in incubations with bleached versus nonbleached corals but also that bleached corals assimilate more DDN. To what extent this additional N is beneficial for the recovery of the coral host after a bleaching event needs further investigation.

DDN assimilation by deep-water corals.

Overall, the total N2 fixation was ~2-fold higher in incubations of S. pistillata (deep) than in incubations of S. pistillata (shallow or 72 h). One explanation for the increased N2 fixation activity with depth may be reduced light availability (350 versus 20 μmol m−2 s−1) leading to reduced O2 production via photosynthesis in corals (46). On a diurnal scale, coral-associated N2 fixation was found to be highest during twilight, when O2 production is not too high to inhibit nitrogenase, the enzyme responsible for N2 fixation (68, 69), but high enough for corals to deliver photosynthetic energy to the diazotrophs (15). Thus, the diurnal window with optimal O2 levels for N2 fixation may be greatly increased with increasing water depth, leading to higher N2 fixation rates. Previously, the abundance of scleractinian corals (Montastraea cavernosa, Bahamas) associated with diazotrophs was found to correlate positively with increasing water depth (15). This suggests that the diazotrophic community composition associated with corals may vary with depth and that the assimilation of DDN by corals may increase with depth as well. Also, the natural δ15N isotopic signature of scleractinian corals tends to be depleted as depth increases (70, 71). This can result from the assimilation of isotopically depleted DDN or from the uptake of isotopically depleted nitrate derived from atmospheric deposition, as for the Gulf of Aqaba/Eilat (72, 73). Here we show not only that the total N2 fixation increased in the incubations with deep versus shallow corals but also that deep corals assimilated 80% (8.65 ng N cm−2 h−1) of the total fixed N into the animal tissue or dinoflagellates. In contrast, shallow corals assimilated only 0% or 30% (1.36 ng N cm−2 h−1) of the total fixed N when incubated for 24 or 72 h, respectively. The higher assimilation by deep corals may result from a shift in the heterotrophic status of the coral. Corals in mesophotic reef environments generally rely more on other trophic strategies (i.e., heterotrophy) than their shallow counterparts in order to meet their metabolic demand and to compensate for the reduced photosynthetic C supply from their symbiotic dinoflagellates (45, 74). We found that the DDN assimilation by shallow and deep corals is inversely correlated with the amount of fixed N quantified in suspended particles in the coral incubation. Furthermore, the amount of fixed N in suspended particles was much smaller after the incubation of deep coral colonies than after the incubation alone of mucus extracted from deep coral colonies. This indicates that the high DDN assimilation into the tissue and dinoflagellates of deep corals is derived mainly via increased heterotrophic feeding on suspended particles rich in fixed N and diazotrophs that have been associated with the mucus. Although deep corals are considered to be less N limited by receiving both C and N from heterotrophic sources, they assimilate more DDN than their shallow counterparts. This could be explained by the fact that deep corals are light limited not only for photosynthesis but also for the uptake of dissolved inorganic N (49; Ezzat and Ferrier-Pagès, unpublished). Therefore, the increased DDN assimilation by deep corals may help to compensate for the reduced inorganic N uptake and may be particularly beneficial during periods when organic particles in seawater are insufficient to fully cover their N demand. The ingestion of planktonic free-living diazotrophs can also provide a substantial amount of N to the coral host, even exceeding the N input from coral-associated diazotrophs (23). Thus, it will be interesting to also investigate the importance of planktonic free-living diazotrophs for the N budget of mesophotic corals.

Contribution of DDN to the coral N budget.

Tropical corals are generally well adapted to flourish in nutrient-poor waters by efficiently recycling ammonium between the animal host and symbiotic dinoflagellates, by heterotrophic feeding on organic N sources, and by actively scavenging dissolved inorganic N from seawater even at very low dissolved N concentrations. In order to estimate the importance of DDN in relation to other inorganic N sources, we compared the present results with data on rates of inorganic N uptake by corals. The rate of ammonium uptake by S. pistillata at nearly natural ambient concentrations (0.2 μM) was ca. 30 ng N cm−2 h−1, taking into account the animal and dinoflagellate assimilation rates, except for highly fed corals, for which the uptake was lower (49). In addition, the total rate of nitrate uptake by S. pistillata at the same low concentrations was equal to 1.5 ng N cm−2 h−1 (75). Overall, dissolved inorganic N contributes for a mean of 30 to 32 ng N cm−2 h−1, although these rates are an approximation, as they vary with light or temperature levels, as well as with other physicochemical and biological factors. If we assume similar inorganic N uptake rates for all of the corals in the present study, DDN can contribute up to ~1.4 ng N cm−2 h−1 in shallow corals or ca. 5% of the inorganic N uptake. This contribution increases up to ~6 ng N cm−2 h−1 in bleached or phosphate-enriched corals and up to ~9.5 ng N cm−2 h−1 in deep corals, representing ca. 20 and 30% of the inorganic N uptake, respectively. In deep corals, with respect to their reduced inorganic N uptake capacity, this contribution is likely to be higher, underlining the importance of DDN for the N requirements of deep corals in relation to other inorganic N sources. As the ambient inorganic N concentrations on tropical coral reefs are often too low to sustain net growth of the coral holobiont (49), the association with diazotrophs likely serves as additional adaptation of corals to overcome N limitation in oligotrophic reef environments. In order to calculate the contribution of DDN to cover the N demand of deep and shallow corals, we used gross photosynthesis rates, C/N ratios, and assimilation rates of photosynthetically acquired C from previous studies with S. pistillata corals from the Red Sea exposed to high- and low-light conditions (45, 48, 70). This shows that DDN contributes only ~1% of the total N demand of shallow corals, while it can increase up to ~15% in deep corals (Fig. 3). Furthermore, in deep corals, DDN satisfies the N demand of dinoflagellates (~26%) to a greater extent than the N demand of the animal host (~9%), likely because of more efficient DDN assimilation by the former. Dinoflagellates can use N2 fixation products in the form of ammonium much faster than the coral host, as previously demonstrated for ammonium uptake from seawater (50). Instead, the coral host assimilates DDN after the synthesis of host macromolecules deriving from prey digestion or after translocation of recycled DDN by dinoflagellates (23). The higher contribution in deep corals is likely a product of both their higher DDN assimilation and their lower N demand, indicating that deep corals are likely less N limited than shallow corals (76). Overall, the present study shows that DDN can contribute importantly to the overall N budget of mesophotic corals, but whether this additional N is beneficial for the resistance and recovery of deep corals from environmental disturbances requires further investigation.

FIG 3 .

FIG 3 

Overview of the percent contribution of DDN assimilation to the N demand (ND) of the animal host (CAND), the dinoflagellates (CDND), and the total symbiotic association (CTND) from shallow and deep S. pistillata corals. The ND was calculated from gross photosynthesis (Pgross) measurements (45), from values of C incorporation into the animal host and the dinoflagellates (48), and from C/N ratios (70) of S. pistillata corals at 5- and 50-m water depths in the Red Sea.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Coral collection and experimental setup.

This study was conducted during November 2014 at the Interuniversity Institute for Marine Science (IUI), northern Gulf of Aqaba/Eilat. By using scuba gear, corals with fragment sizes with a 10- to 30-cm2 surface area were collected from the reef at both 5-m and 40- to 50-m water depths. While light conditions decreased from 200 to 400 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 at 5 m to 20 to 40 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 at 40 to 50 m, the seawater temperature (24.3 ± 0.1°C) and phosphate (338 ± 145 nM) and total dissolved inorganic N (ammonium, nitrite, and nitrate; 507 ± 131 nM) concentrations remained stable throughout the investigated depth range (mean ± standard error [SE]). Environmental data were provided by the Israel National Monitoring Program at the Gulf of Eilat (http://www.iui-eilat.ac.il/Research/NMPMeteoData.aspx) and represent average values collected during November 2014 at three coastal sampling stations (Taba, Japanese Gardens, Water Control Station) close to our study site.

In total, three different substrates (i.e., unfiltered seawater samples, coral fragments, and coral mucus samples) were collected for the following 15N2 incubation experiments (Table 2). Unfiltered seawater samples (without corals or mucus) were incubated in order to investigate net rates of N2 fixation by the natural planktonic diazotroph community (i.e., particles suspended in seawater). It must be noted that, except in incubations with unfiltered seawater, coral and coral mucus incubations were performed with 0.2-µm-filtered seawater. Therefore, all of the fixed N in the suspended particles of these incubations was derived from coral-associated diazotrophs (probably from bacteria within the mucus layer). For the mucus incubation, six large colonies of S. pistillata were collected from 5-m and 40- to 50-m depths, respectively. Mucus samples were extracted by gently spraying 500 ml of 0.2-µm-filtered seawater onto colonies maintained in air. This mucus mixture was subsequently incubated as described below to investigate rates of N2 fixation by mucus-associated diazotrophs in the absence of corals (i.e., particles suspended in mucus). Mucus samples collected from shallow and deep corals will be referred to as mucus (shallow) and mucus (deep), respectively.

TABLE 2 .

Summary of the different 15N2 incubation experiments conducted with coral fragments, coral mucus, and unfiltered seawater samples to quantify DDN assimilation and/or N2 fixation rates by the different incubated substrates

Incubated substrate Depth (m) Treatment before 15N2 incubation 15N2 incubation time (h)
Coral fragmentsa
    Alveopora species (shallow) 5 None 24
    S. pistillata (shallow) 5 None 24
    S. pistillata (72 h) 5 None 3 × 24
    S. pistillata (phosphate) 5 3 μM H2PO4 24
    S. pistillata (bleached)  5 Thermal-stress-induced bleaching 24
    S. pistillata (deep) 40–50 None 24
Coral mucusb
    Mucus (shallow) 5 None 24
    Mucus (deep) 40–50 None 24
Unfiltered seawaterc 5 None 24
a

DDN assimilation by animal tissue and dinoflagellates, N2 fixation by mucus and other suspended particles continuously released by corals.

b

N2 fixation by mucus suspended particles.

c

N2 fixation by seawater suspended particles (natural planktonic diazotrophs).

The coral incubations were used to quantify the assimilation of DDN by animal tissue and dinoflagellates and to investigate net rates of N2 fixation by suspended particles within the incubation medium in the presence of corals. Compared to the mucus incubation, the suspended particles in this experiment represent mucus and other particles continuously released by the coral. Three different sets of corals were collected (Table 2). (i) The first set represents shallow-water corals that were directly incubated (right after sampling) as described below without further treatment. Fragments of Alveopora species (n = 4) and S. pistillata (n = 5) were collected from a 5-m water depth. These fragments will be referred to Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow). Additional S. pistillata fragments (n = 3) from a 5-m depth were incubated for 3 days to determine long-term DDN assimilation. In order not to incubate the corals in the same water for 72 h, the incubation water was renewed every 24 h and filtered for 15N analysis, while the coral fragments were only sampled for 15N analysis at the end of the 3 days. These fragments will be called S. pistillata (72 h). (ii) The second set represents shallow-water corals that were treated as described below prior to the 15N2 incubation experiments. Fragments of S. pistillata collected at a 5-m depth and transferred to six aquaria in outdoor water tables (natural light) with temperature and photosynthetic photon flux density (PFD) sets that corresponded to those found at 5 m. Ambient PFD was obtained by applying layers of black mesh above the tables. The ambient seawater temperature (24 to 25°C) was kept constant by using high rates of seawater renewal in the aquaria. For this set of corals, two treatments were applied in triplicate aquaria (with two fragments per aquarium). Three tanks maintained with a continuous seawater renewal rate of 20% h−1 were submitted to a thermal stress in which the temperature was gradually increased to 30°C for a week (1°C/day) with aquarium heaters connected to electronic controllers. After coral fragments visually bleached [here called S. pistillata (bleached)], the temperature was returned to 25°C within a week for the following incubation experiments. Three other tanks were maintained for 2 days in a closed circuit under elevated phosphate levels achieved by enriching the aquaria with a pulse of 3 µM H2PO4 twice a day [here called S. pistillata (phosphate)]. In the latter condition, the seawater was changed every day and the following incubations were conducted in phosphate-enriched seawater. (iii) The last set represents fragments of mesophotic S. pistillata (n = 5) collected from a 40- to 50-m depth and incubated directly after sampling. These fragments will be called S. pistillata (deep).

15N2 incubation experiments.

We used the 15N2-enriched seawater addition method and produced 15N2-enriched seawater prior to the incubation experiment by injection of 10 ml of 15N2 gas (98% Eurisotop) into degassed, 0.2-μm-filtered seawater, followed by vigorous shaking for at least 12 h. This procedure theoretically ensures 90 to 100% 15N2 equilibration (26). Afterward, each coral fragment was individually placed into a 500-ml gas-tight glass bottle completely filled with 450 ml of seawater (0.2 μm filtered) and 50 ml of 15N2-enriched seawater. Additional 500-ml bottles containing either 450 ml of the mucus mixture or 450 ml of the unfiltered seawater were incubated similarly after adding 50 ml of 15N2-enriched seawater. On the basis of the volume of the incubation bottle and the quantity of 15N2-enriched seawater added, this resulted in a theoretical enrichment of ~9.8 atom% 15N in the incubation medium of all bottles, similar to previous 15N2 studies of corals and sponges (22, 31, 77, 78). The addition of 15N2-enriched seawater can potentially contaminate the sample with trace metals that can affect N2 fixation rates, particularly in areas were trace metals are limiting (79). As the Gulf of Aqaba/Eilat is known to receive relatively large amounts of trace metals compared to other areas (80), a potential effect of contamination was considered to be insignificant. All bottles were closed gastight and incubated for 24 h [except for Stylophora (72 h)]. Additional coral, mucus mixture, and unfiltered seawater incubations without 15N2 addition served as control samples (15N background). During the incubations, bottles were continuously shaken in water baths equipped with agitator plates. Water baths were maintained under the right light and temperature conditions as described above by applying the same filters to shade the solar irradiance to the desired level and using temperature controllers.

At the end of the incubation, coral fragments were collected from the chambers, rinsed with filtered seawater to remove their mucus, and stored frozen until 15N analysis of the animal tissue and dinoflagellate fractions. The water of all incubations (coral, mucus, and unfiltered seawater) was filtered onto precombusted (400°C, 4 to 5 h) GF/F filters, and filters were also stored frozen until 15N analysis of suspended particles from the incubation water.

Sample analysis.

The coral tissue was completely removed from the skeleton with an air brush and homogenized with a potter tissue grinder. Homogenates were then separated in several centrifugation steps into the animal and algal fractions according to reference 49, and each fraction was subsequently freeze-dried. All GF/F filters were dried in an oven (60°C, 48 h) prior to 15N analysis of the suspended particles. Finally, the organic N content together with its 15N enrichment in the animal tissue, dinoflagellates, and suspended particles was quantified with a mass spectrometer (Delta Plus; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Germany) coupled via a type III interface to a C/N analyzer (Flash EA; Thermo Fisher Scientific). The standard deviation obtained from repeated measurements of control samples was better than 0.5 µg for PN in the range used (5 to 50 µg N) and was <0.0001 atom% for 15N enrichment. The 15N excess enrichment for each sample was calculated with the formula atom% 15Nexcess = (atom% 15Nsample − atom% 15Ncontrol), where atom% 15Nsample is the 15N enrichment of samples after exposure to 15N2-enriched seawater and atom% 15Ncontrol is the natural 15N enrichment of control samples without 15N2 exposure. The atom% 15Nexcess was considered significant when it was at least three times as high as the standard deviation of the atom% 15Ncontrol obtained. We assumed that the 15N enrichment of the animal tissue and dinoflagellates results entirely from the net assimilation of fixed N by the coral (i.e., DDN assimilation). Finally, the net N2 fixation by suspended particles and the DDN assimilation into the different coral compartments were calculated according to reference 81 by the equation net N2 fixation or DDN assimilation = (atom% 15Nexcess/[t × 9.8]) × (μg PNsample/cm2 or liter), where t is the incubation time, 9.8 is the 15N enrichment of the incubation water at the beginning (atom% 15N), and PNsample/cm2 or liter is the particulate N content of the sample at the end of the incubation normalized either per cm2 of coral skeletal surface area or per liter of incubation water. The skeletal surface area of the coral colonies was determined by the wax technique (82).

Statistical analyses.

Statistical analyses were carried out with Primer-E version 6 software (83) with the PERMANOVA+ add-on (84). To look for differences in N2 fixation and DDN assimilation by S. pistillata corals exposed to different environmental conditions, one-factor PERMANOVAs based on Euclidian distance were conducted for the individual compartments (suspended particles, animal tissue, and dinoflagellates), as well as for the sum of all three compartments (total N2 fixation). An additional one-factor PERMANOVA was conducted to investigate differences in rates of N2 fixation by suspended particles after incubation of Alveopora species (shallow) and S. pistillata (shallow) corals. Type III (partial) sum of squares was used with permutation of residuals under a reduced model (999 permutations). The significance for the main test, as well for the pairwise comparisons, was based on MC tests because of the low number of unique permutations.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank D. Allemand, Director of the Centre Scientifique de Monaco, for scientifique support, and Leïla Ezzat, Dan Tchernov, and the staff of the IUI for help with the experiments and sample analysis. We also thank Sophie Rabouille and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments that helped a lot improving the quality of the manuscript.

This study was funded by the Centre Scientifique de Monaco. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.

Funding Statement

Funder: Centre Scientifique de Monaco "This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors."

Footnotes

Citation Bednarz VN, Grover R, Maguer J-F, Fine M, Ferrier-Pagès C. 2017. The assimilation of diazotroph-derived nitrogen by scleractinian corals depends on their metabolic status. mBio 8:e02058-16. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02058-16.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Rohwer F, Seguritan V, Azam F, Knowlton N. 2002. Diversity and distribution of coral-associated bacteria. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 243:1–10. doi: 10.3354/meps243001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ainsworth TD, Thurber RV, Gates RD. 2010. The future of coral reefs: a microbial perspective. Trends Ecol Evol 25:233–240. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2009.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rosenberg E, Koren O, Reshef L, Efrony R, Zilber-Rosenberg I. 2007. The role of microorganisms in coral health, disease and evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:355–362. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kimes NE, van Nostrand JD, Weil E, Zhou J, Morris PJ. 2010. Microbial functional structure of Montastraea faveolata, an important Caribbean reef-building coral, differs between healthy and yellow-band diseased colonies. Environ Microbiol 12:541–556. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02113.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Krediet CJ, Ritchie KB, Paul VJ, Teplitski M. 2013. Coral-associated micro-organisms and their roles in promoting coral health and thwarting diseases. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 280:20122328. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2012.2328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Howarth RW. 1988. Nutrient limitation of net primary production in marine ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 19:89–110. doi: 10.1146/annurev.es.19.110188.000513. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Wang JT, Douglas AE. 1999. Essential amino acid synthesis and nitrogen recycling in an alga-invertebrate symbiosis. Mar Biol 135:219–222. doi: 10.1007/s002270050619. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tanaka Y, Grottoli AG, Matsui Y, Suzuki A, Sakai K. 2015. Partitioning of nitrogen sources to algal endosymbionts of corals with long-term 15N-labelling and a mixing model. Ecol Modell 309–310:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2015.04.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ayukai T. 1995. Retention of phytoplankton and planktonic microbes on coral reefs within the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Coral Reefs 14:141–147. doi: 10.1007/BF00367231. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Anthony KRN, Fabricius KE. 2000. Shifting roles of heterotrophy and autotrophy in coral energetics under varying turbidity. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 252:221–253. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(00)00237-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Miller DJ, Yellowlees D. 1989. Inorganic nitrogen uptake by symbiotic marine cnidarians: a critical review. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci 237:109–125. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1989.0040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lema KA, Willis BL, Bourne DG. 2012. Corals form characteristic associations with symbiotic nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:3136–3144. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07800-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.D Ainsworth T, Krause L, Bridge T, Torda G, Raina JB, Zakrzewski M, Gates RD, Padilla-Gamiño JL, Spalding HL, Smith C, Woolsey ES, Bourne DG, Bongaerts P, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Leggat W. 2015. The coral core microbiome identifies rare bacterial taxa as ubiquitous endosymbionts. ISME J 9:2261–2274. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.39. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yamamuro M, Kayanne H, Minagawao M. 1995. Carbon and nitrogen stable isotopes of primary producers in coral reef ecosystems. Limnol Oceanogr 40:617–621. doi: 10.4319/lo.1995.40.3.0617. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lesser MP, Falcón LI, Rodríguez-Román A, Enríquez S, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Iglesias-Prieto R. 2007. Nitrogen fixation by symbiotic cyanobacteria provides a source of nitrogen for the scleractinian coral Montastraea cavernosa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 346:143–152. doi: 10.3354/meps07008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shashar N, Cohen Y, Loya Y, Sar N. 1994. Nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) in stony corals: evidence for coral-bacteria interactions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 111:259–264. doi: 10.3354/meps111259. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rädecker N, Meyer FW, Bednarz VN, Cardini U, Wild C. 2014. Ocean acidification rapidly reduces dinitrogen fixation associated with the hermatypic coral Seriatopora hystrix. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 511:297–302. doi: 10.3354/meps10912. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bednarz VN, Cardini U, van Hoytema N, Al-Rshaidat MMD, Wild C. 2015. Seasonal variation in dinitrogen fixation and oxygen fluxes associated with two dominant zooxanthellate soft corals from the northern Red Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 519:141–152. doi: 10.3354/meps11091. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cardini U, Bednarz VN, Naumann MS, van Hoytema N, Rix L, Foster RA, Al-Rshaidat MMD, Wild C. 2015. Functional significance of dinitrogen fixation in sustaining coral productivity under oligotrophic conditions. Proc Biol Sci 282:20152257. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2015.2257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lesser MP, Mazel CH, Gorbunov MY, Falkowski PG. 2004. Discovery of symbiotic nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in corals. Science 305:997–1000. doi: 10.1126/science.1099128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Williams WM, Viner AB, Broughton WJ. 1987. Nitrogen fixation (acetylene reduction) associated with the living coral Acropora variabilis. Mar Biol 94:531–535. doi: 10.1007/BF00431399. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Grover R, Ferrier-Pagès C, Maguer JF, Ezzat L, Fine M. 2014. Nitrogen fixation in the mucus of Red Sea corals. J Exp Biol 217:3962–3963. doi: 10.1242/jeb.111591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Benavides M, Houlbrèque F, Camps M, Lorrain A, Grosso O, Bonnet S. 2016. Diazotrophs: a non-negligible source of nitrogen for the tropical coral Stylophora pistillata. J Exp Biol 219:2608–2612. doi: 10.1242/jeb.139451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Riemann L, Farnelid H, Steward GF. 2010. Nitrogenase genes in non-cyanobacterial plankton: prevalence, diversity and regulation in marine waters. Aquat Microb Ecol 61:235–247. doi: 10.3354/ame01431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Großkopf T, Mohr W, Baustian T, Schunck H, Gill D, Kuypers MMM, Lavik G, Schmitz RA, Wallace DWR, LaRoche J. 2012. Doubling of marine dinitrogen-fixation rates based on direct measurements. Nature 488:361–364. doi: 10.1038/nature11338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mohr W, Grosskopf T, Wallace DW, LaRoche J. 2010. Methodological underestimation of oceanic nitrogen fixation rates. PLoS One 5:e12583. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Falkowski PG, Dubinsky Z, Muscatine L, Porter JW. 1984. Light and the bioenergetics of a symbiotic coral. BioScience 34:705–709. doi: 10.2307/1309663. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Anthony KRN, Hoogenboom MO, Maynard JA, Grottoli AG, Middlebrook R. 2009. Energetics approach to predicting mortality risk from environmental stress: a case study of coral bleaching. Funct Ecol 23:539–550. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2008.01531.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Grottoli AG, Rodrigues LJ, Palardy JE. 2006. Heterotrophic plasticity and resilience in bleached corals. Nature 440:1186–1189. doi: 10.1038/nature04565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Cardini U, van Hoytema N, Bednarz VN, Rix L, Foster RA, Al-Rshaidat MMD, Wild C. 2016. Microbial dinitrogen fixation in coral holobionts exposed to thermal stress and bleaching. Environ Microbiol 18:2620–2633. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Camps M, Benavides M, Lema KA, Bourne DG, Grosso O, Bonnet S. 2016. Released coral mucus does not enhance planktonic N2 fixation rates. Aquat Microb Ecol 77:51–63. doi: 10.3354/ame01787. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Foster RA, Paytan A, Zehr JP. 2009. Seasonality of N2 fixation and nifH gene diversity in the Gulf of Aqaba (Red Sea). Limnol Oceanogr 54:219–233. doi: 10.4319/lo.2009.54.1.0219. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Rahav E, Herut B, Mulholland M, Belkin N, Elifantz H, Berman-Frank I. 2015. Heterotrophic and autotrophic contribution to dinitrogen fixation in the Gulf of Aqaba. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 522:67–77. doi: 10.3354/meps11143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Bonnet S, Berthelot H, Turk-Kubo K, Fawcett S, Rahav E, L'Helguen S, Berman-Frank I. 2015. Dynamics of Ns> fixation and fate of diazotroph-derived nitrogen in a low-nutrient, low-chlorophyll ecosystem: results from the VAHINE mesocosm experiment (New Caledonia). Biogeosciences 13:2653–2673. doi: 10.5194/bg-13-2653-2016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cardini U, Bednarz VN, Foster RA, Wild C. 2014. Benthic N2 fixation in coral reefs and the potential effects of human-induced environmental change. Ecol Evol 4:1706–1727. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Van Duyl F, Gast G. 2001. Linkage of small-scale spatial variations in DOC, inorganic nutrients and bacterioplankton growth with different coral reef water types. Aquat Microb Ecol 24:17–26. doi: 10.3354/ame024017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Nakajima R, Yoshida T, Azman BAR, Zaleha K, Othman BHR, Toda T. 2009. In situ release of coral mucus by Acropora and its influence on the heterotrophic bacteria. Aquat Ecol 43:815–823. doi: 10.1007/s10452-008-9210-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Allers E, Niesner C, Wild C, Pernthaler J. 2008. Microbes enriched in seawater after addition of coral mucus. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:3274–3278. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01870-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Naumann MS, Richter C, El-Zibdah M, Wild C. 2009. Coral mucus as an efficient trap for picoplanktonic cyanobacteria: implications for pelagic–benthic coupling in the reef ecosystem. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 385:65–76. doi: 10.3354/meps08073. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Crossland CJ, Barnes DJ, Borowitzka MA. 1980. Diurnal lipid and mucus production in the staghorn coral Acropora acuminata. Mar Biol 60:81–90. doi: 10.1007/BF00389151. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Tremblay P, Grover R, Maguer JF, Legendre L, Ferrier-Pagès C. 2012. Autotrophic carbon budget in coral tissue: a new 13C-based model of photosynthate translocation. J Exp Biol 215:1384–1393. doi: 10.1242/jeb.065201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Wild C, Huettel M, Klueter A, Kremb SG, Rasheed MY, Jørgensen BB. 2004. Coral mucus functions as an energy carrier and particle trap in the reef ecosystem. Nature 428:66–70. doi: 10.1038/nature02344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Fonvielle JA, Reynaud S, Jacquet S, LeBerre B, Ferrier-Pagès C. 2015. First evidence of an important organic matter trophic pathway between temperate corals and pelagic microbial communities. PLoS One 10:e0139175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tremblay P, Weinbauer MG, Rottier C, Guérardel Y, Nozais C, Ferrier-Pagès C. 2011. Mucus composition and bacterial communities associated with the tissue and skeleton of three scleractinian corals maintained under culture conditions. J Mar Biol Assoc 91:649–657. doi: 10.1017/S002531541000130X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mass T, Einbinder S, Brokovich E, Shashar N, Vago R, Erez J, Dubinsky Z. 2007. Photoacclimation of Stylophora pistillata to light extremes: metabolism and calcification. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 334:93–102. doi: 10.3354/meps334093. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Lesser MP, Slattery M, Stat M, Ojimi M, Gates RD, Grottoli A. 2010. Photoacclimatization by the coral Montastraea cavernosa in the mesophotic zone: light, food, and genetics. Ecology 91:990–1003. doi: 10.1890/09-0313.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Crossland CJ. 1987. In situ release of mucus and DOC-lipid from the corals Acropora variabilis and Stylophora pistillata in different light regimes. Coral Reefs 6:35–42. doi: 10.1007/BF00302210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tremblay P, Grover R, Maguer JF, Hoogenboom M, Ferrier-Pagès C. 2014. Carbon translocation from symbiont to host depends on irradiance and food availability in the tropical coral Stylophora pistillata. Coral Reefs 33:1–13. doi: 10.1007/s00338-013-1100-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Grover R, Maguer JF, Reynaud-Vaganay S, Ferrier-Pagès C. 2002. Uptake of ammonium by the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata: effect of feeding, light, and ammonium concentrations. Limnol Oceanogr 47:782–790. doi: 10.4319/lo.2002.47.3.0782. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Pernice M, Meibom A, Van Den Heuvel A, Kopp C, Domart-Coulon I, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Dove S. 2012. A single-cell view of ammonium assimilation in coral-dinoflagellate symbiosis. ISME J 6:1314–1324. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2011.196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kopp C, Pernice M, Domart-Coulon I, Djediat C, Spangenberg JE, Alexander DTL, Hignette M, Meziane T, Meibom A. 2013. Highly dynamic cellular-level response of symbiotic coral to a sudden increase in environmental nitrogen. mBio 4:e00052-13. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00052-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Godinot C, Grover R, Allemand D, Ferrier-Pagès C. 2011. High phosphate uptake requirements of the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata. J Exp Biol 214:2749–2754. doi: 10.1242/jeb.054239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mills MM, Ridame C, Davey M, La Roche J, Geider RJ. 2004. Iron and phosphorus co-limit nitrogen fixation in the eastern tropical North Atlantic. Nature 429:292–294. doi: 10.1038/nature02550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Al-Niemi TS, Kahn ML, McDermott TR. 1997. P metabolism in the bean-Rhizobium tropici symbiosis. Plant Physiol 113:1233–1242. doi: 10.1104/pp.113.4.1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Batterman SA, Wurzburger N, Hedin LO. 2013. Nitrogen and phosphorus interact to control tropical symbiotic N2 fixation: a test in Inga punctata. J Ecol 101:1400–1408. doi: 10.1111/1365-2745.12138. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Gutschick VP. 1981. Evolved strategies in nitrogen acquisition by plants. Am Nat 118:607–637. doi: 10.1086/283858. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Israel DW. 1987. Investigation of the role of phosphorus in symbiotic dinitrogen fixation. Plant Physiol 84:835–840. doi: 10.1104/pp.84.3.835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Gentili F, Huss-Danell K. 2003. Local and systemic effects of phosphorus and nitrogen on nodulation and nodule function in Alnus incana. J Exp Bot 54:2757–2767. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erg311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Robson A, O’hara G, Abbott L. 1981. Involvement of phosphorus in nitrogen fixation by subterranean clover (Trifolium subterraneum L.). Funct Plant Biol 8:427–436. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Karl D, Michaels A, Bergman B, Capone D, Carpenter E, Letelier R, Lipschultz F, Paerl H, Sigman D, Stal L. 2002. Dinitrogen fixation in the world’s oceans, p 47–98. In Boyer EW, Howarth RW (ed), The nitrogen cycle at regional to global scales. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bednarz VN, van Hoytema N, Cardini U, Naumann MS, Al-Rshaidat MMD, Wild C. 2015. Dinitrogen fixation and primary productivity by carbonate and silicate reef sand communities of the northern Red Sea. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 527:47–57. doi: 10.3354/meps11224. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Santos HF, Carmo FL, Duarte G, Dini-Andreote F, Castro CB, Rosado AS, van Elsas JD, Peixoto RS. 2014. Climate change affects key nitrogen-fixing bacterial populations on coral reefs. ISME J 8:2272–2279. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lee STM, Davy SK, Tang SL, Fan TY, Kench PS. 2015. Successive shifts in the microbial community of the surface mucus layer and tissues of the coral Acropora muricata under thermal stress. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 91:289–296. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiv142. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Postgate JR. 1982. The fundamentals of nitrogen fixation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Tremblay P, Naumann MS, Sikorski S, Grover R, Ferrier-Pagès C. 2012. Experimental assessment of organic carbon fluxes in the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata during a thermal and photo stress event. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 453:63–77. doi: 10.3354/meps09640. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Niggl W, Glas M, Laforsch C, Mayr C, Wild C. 2009. First evidence of coral bleaching stimulating organic matter release by reef corals, p 905–911. Proc 11th Int Coral Reef Symp, 7 to 11 July 2008, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.
  • 67.Wooldridge SA. 2009. A new conceptual model for the enhanced release of mucus in symbiotic reef corals during ‘bleaching’ conditions. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 396:145–152. doi: 10.3354/meps08310. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Berman-Frank I, Lundgren P, Chen YB, Küpper H, Kolber Z, Bergman B, Falkowski P. 2001. Segregation of nitrogen fixation and oxygenic photosynthesis in the marine cyanobacterium Trichodesmium. Science 294:1534–1537. doi: 10.1126/science.1064082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Stal LJ. 2009. Is the distribution of nitrogen-fixing cyanobacteria in the oceans related to temperature? Environ Microbiol 11:1632–1645. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2009.00016.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Alamaru A, Loya Y, Brokovich E, Yam R, Shemesh A. 2009. Carbon and nitrogen utilization in two species of Red Sea corals along a depth gradient: insights from stable isotope analysis of total organic material and lipids. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 73:5333–5342. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2009.06.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Muscatine L, Kaplan I. 1994. Resource partitioning by reef corals as determined from stable isotope composition II. δ15N of Zooxanthellae and animal tissue versus depth. Pac Sci 48:304–312. [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wankel SD, Chen Y, Kendall C, Post AF, Paytan A. 2010. Sources of aerosol nitrate to the Gulf of Aqaba: evidence from δ15N and δ18O of nitrate and trace metal chemistry. Mar Chem 120:90–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Slattery M, Lesser MP, Brazeau D, Stokes MD, Leichter JJ. 2011. Connectivity and stability of mesophotic coral reefs. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 408:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2011.07.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Muscatine L, Porter JW, Kaplan IR. 1989. Resource partitioning by reef corals as determined from stable isotope composition. Mar Biol 100:185–193. doi: 10.1007/BF00391957. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Grover R, Maguer J, Allemand D, Ferrier-Pagès C. 2003. Nitrate uptake in the scleractinian coral Stylophora pistillata. Limnol Oceanogr 48:2266–2274. doi: 10.4319/lo.2003.48.6.2266. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Dubinsky Z, Jokiel PL. 1994. Ratio of energy and nutrient fluxes regulates symbiosis between zooxanthellae and corals. Pac Sci 48:313–324. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Ribes M, Dziallas C, Coma R, Riemann L. 2015. Microbial diversity and putative diazotrophy in high- and low-microbial-abundance Mediterranean sponges. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:5683–5693. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01320-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Middelburg JJ, Mueller CE, Veuger B, Larsson AI, Form A, van Oevelen D. 2015. Discovery of symbiotic nitrogen fixation and chemoautotrophy in cold-water corals. Sci Rep 5:17962. doi: 10.1038/srep17962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Klawonn I, Lavik G, Böning P, Marchant HK, Dekaezemacker J, Mohr W, Ploug H. 2015. Simple approach for the preparation of (15-15)N2-enriched water for nitrogen fixation assessments: evaluation, application and recommendations. Front Microbiol 6:769. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Chen Y, Paytan A, Chase Z, Measures C, Beck AJ, Sañudo-Wilhelmy SA, Post AF. 2008. Sources and fluxes of atmospheric trace elements to the Gulf of Aqaba, Red Sea. J Geophys Res 113:D05306. doi: 10.1029/2007JD009110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Montoya JP, Voss M, Kähler P, Capone DG. 1996. A simple, high-precision, high-sensitivity tracer assay for N2 fixation. Appl Environ Microbiol 62:986–993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Stimson J, Kinzie RA. 1991. The temporal pattern and rate of release of zooxanthellae from the reef coral Pocillopora damicornis (Linnaeus) under nitrogen-enrichment and control conditions. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 153:63–74. doi: 10.1016/S0022-0981(05)80006-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Clarke KR, Gorley RN. 2006. Primer version 6: user manual/tutorial primer-E. Plymouth, England. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Anderson MJ. 2001. A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46. doi: 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES