Table 3.
CoP oscillation (3 experimental condition × 2 visual condition × 2 recording epoch × 2 CoP axis ANOVA)
| Effects | F | p value | Fisher’s test | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Comparisons | p value | |||
| Experimental condition | 12.740(2,18) | <0.001 | cTBS > nostim | <0.001 |
| cTBS > sham | <0.001 | |||
| nostim vs sham | 0.712 | |||
| Visual condition | 133.508(1,9) | <0.001 | ||
| Recording epoch | 9.865(1,9) | 0.012 | ||
| CoP axis | 0.019(1,9) | 0.892 | ||
| Experimental condition × visual condition | 2.959(2,18) | 0.077 | ||
| Experimental condition × recording epoch | 0.263(2,18) | 0.771 | ||
| Visual condition × recording epoch | 8.698(1,9) | 0.016 | EC last > EC first | 0.004 |
| EO last > EO first | <0.001 | |||
| EC first > EO first | <0.001 | |||
| EC first > EO last | <0.001 | |||
| EC last > EO first | <0.001 | |||
| EC last > EO last | <0.001 | |||
| Experimental condition × CoP axis | 0.813(2,18) | 0.459 | ||
| Visual condition × CoP axis | 47.566(1,9) | <0.001 | EC M-L > EC A-P | 0.002 |
| EO A-P > EO M-L | <0.001 | |||
| EC A-P > EO A-P | <0.001 | |||
| EC A-P > EO M-L | <0.001 | |||
| EC M-L > EO A-P | <0.001 | |||
| EC M-L > EO M-L | <0.001 | |||
| Recording epoch × CoP axis | 0.377(1,9) | 0.554 | ||
| Experimental condition × visual condition × recording epoch | 0.374(2,18) | 0.693 | ||
| Experimental condition × visual condition × CoP axis | 3.228(2,18) | 0.063 | ||
| Experimental condition × recording epoch × CoP axis | 1.372(2,18) | 0.279 | ||
| Experimental condition × recording epoch × CoP axis | 0.726(1,9) | 0.416 | ||
| Experimental condition × visual condition × recording epoch × CoP axis | 1.012(2,18) | 0.383 | ||
Experimental condition: no stimulation (nostim), cerebellar stimulation (cTBS), sham stimulation (sham); visual condition: eyes closed (EC), eyes open (EO); CoP axis: medio-lateral (M-L), antero-posterior (A-P); recording epoch: first 30 trials (first), last 30 trials (last)