Skip to main content
PMC home page
Nanomaterials logoLink to Nanomaterials
. 2016 Oct 14;6(10):186. doi: 10.3390/nano6100186

Triboelectric Hydrogen Gas Sensor with Pd Functionalized Surface

Sung-Ho Shin 1, Yang Hyeog Kwon 1, Young-Hwan Kim 1, Joo-Yun Jung 2,*, Junghyo Nah 1,*
Editor: Chen-Zhong Li
PMCID: PMC5245194  PMID: 28335313

Abstract

Palladium (Pd)-based hydrogen (H2) gas sensors have been widely investigated thanks to its fast reaction and high sensitivity to hydrogen. Various sensing mechanisms have been adopted for H2 gas sensors; however, all the sensors must be powered through an external battery. We report here an H2 gas sensor that can detect H2 by measuring the output voltages generated during contact electrification between two friction surfaces. When the H2 sensor, composed of Pd-coated ITO (indium tin oxide) and PET (polyethylene Terephthalate) film, is exposed to H2, its output voltage is varied in proportion to H2 concentration because the work function (WF) of Pd-coated surface changes, altering triboelectric charging behavior. Specifically, the output voltage of the sensor is gradually increased as exposing H2 concentration increases. Reproducible and sensitive sensor response was observed up 1% H2 exposure. The approach introduced here can easily be adopted to development of triboelectric gas sensors detecting other gas species.

Keywords: self-powered sensor, H2 detection, palladium, gas sensor, triboelectricity

1. Introduction

Hydrogen (H2) has been claimed to be an alternative to replace fossil fuels [1,2,3,4]. Since H2 is flammable, explosive, colorless, and odorless gas, precise detection of its concentration is important for prevention of potential accidents and its safe use [5]. Thus, many H2 sensors, exploiting different sensing mechanisms, have been introduced to date [6,7,8,9]. Among them, palladium (Pd)-based H2 sensor is one of the most widely used H2 sensors due to its fast reaction to H2, high sensitivity, and selectivity [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. When Pd is exposed to H2 molecules, Pd is reacted with H2 by absorbing H2 molecules inside its lattice, expanding the volume: Pd is transformed as either α-phase PdHx or β-phase PdHx depending on exposed H2 concentrations. Consequently, the electrical and optical properties of Pd are changed as it is exposed to H2. Using this mechanism, several H2 sensors have been reported. For instance, H2 sensors, utilizing nanogap structures [10,11], surface acoustic wave (SAW) [13,14], Schottky diodes structure [15,16], and surface plasmon effect [17,18], have been reported. Recently, triboelectric energy harvesting has gained much attention as a route to supply necessary power to operate electronic devices [20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Further, few attempts have been made to develop chemical sensors utilizing triboelectric effect [27,28]. Specifically, detection is usually made by measuring variable triboelectric output as a result of friction surface reaction with target gas molecules [27]. However, only limited chemical species have been probed so far and further investigation is necessary to expand its application.

Here, we report a self-powered H2 gas sensor by adopting triboelectric effects. When two dielectric surfaces on metal electrode are periodically contacted and released, each surface is electrified due to charge separation between two surfaces. The surface that gained electrons is charged negatively, while the other surface that lost electrons is positively charged, depending on their difference in electron affinity. These surface charges electrostatically induce counter charges on the facing metal electrode, developing the potential difference between two metal electrodes. Therefore, when the two electrodes are connected through an external load, it drives the electrons to flow between them. In this work, based on this triboelectric generation mechanism, we report a self-powered H2 gas sensor, demonstrating reliable sensing performance from 0% to 1% H2 exposures.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Preperation of Self-Powered H2 Gas Sensor

The schematic representation of the self-powered Pd H2 gas sensor is shown in Figure 1a. Two indium tin oxide (ITO) (130 nm)/polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) (130 μm) substrates (dimension: 1 cm × 1 cm × 130.13 μm) are first cleaned with IPA acetone and DI water, respectively. On one substrate, a 10 nm-thick Pd is thermally evaporated on the ITO side of the substrate as an active H2 sensing layer. The other substrate is used as the contacting substrate without any chemical treatment or coating, where the PET side of the substrate is employed as a counter contact surface. Lastly, ITO electrodes of the two substrates are connected through an external circuit. Figure 1b shows the cross sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of the evaporated Pd. The Pd layer id co-deposited on a Si/SiO2 substrate in order to measure the thickness of the Pd layer. It can be noticed that ~10 nm evaporated Pd is deposited on the substrate. Next, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) was also examined to verify the evaporated Pd layer on the ITO surface (Figure 1c).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) Schematic representations of self-powered H2 gas sensor fabrication. First, a 10 nm-thick Pd is thermally evaporated on an indium tin oxide (ITO) surface. The courter surface consists of the polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) and ITO layer. Two contacting surfaces, PET and ITO surfaces, were periodically pressed and released during measurement. Triboelectric output voltages were measured while exposing the devices at different concentrations of H2 gas; (b) transmission electron microscopy (TEM) shows the thickness of evaporated Pd layer, ~10 nm; (c) energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) of Pd coated ITO electrode. It clearly indicates the contents of Pd deposited on an ITO/PET substrate.

2.2. Self-Powered H2 Gas Sensor Test Set up

For self-powered H2 gas sensor measurement, the test setup shown in Figure 2 was prepared. The test setup is composed of two parts: gas flow control unit, exposing gas concentration using mass flow control units (MFCs) by introducing 5% H2 and dry air at specific ratios, and measurement unit, measuring voltage between two electrodes by periodic contact. Experimental details of gas exposure are described in the Materials and Methods section. A specific concentration of H2, prepared in the gas control part, flowed into an enclosed gas chamber (length × width × height: 6 cm × 6 cm × 6 cm), within which the custom-built pushing machine is installed. Two surfaces of the H2 sensor were mounted on the pushing machine and were contacted periodically during pressing and releasing motions.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

H2 gas sensor test setup consisting of gas control part and measurement part. A specific concentration of H2 is precisely controlled by mixing dry air and H2 at different ratio and the mixed gas is then introduced into the measurement chamber with a custom-made pushing machine installed inside. The output signals from the sensor were measured using the data acquisition instrument.

2.3. Mechanism and Output Performance of Self-Powered H2 Gas Sensor

Figure 3a shows the sensing mechanism of a self-powered H2 gas sensor, driven by triboelectric induction mechanism [29]. At the initial state, both Pd and PET surfaces have no surface charges. As the two surfaces are compressed, the electrons from donor interface states of the PET surface move toward Pd-functionalized ITO electrode through an external circuit, negatively charging the Pd-functionalized surface and positively charging the PET surface (Figure 3(ai)) [20]. As the two surfaces start to become separated, the surface charges on both contacting surfaces induce counter charges on the facing electrodes, developing the potential difference between the top and bottom electrode (Figure 3(aii)). At the fully separated state, charge equilibrium state is reached between the contacting surfaces and facing electrodes (Figure 3(aiii)). Lastly, as the two surfaces make contact again, induced charges on the electrodes disappear again due to a break of the charge neutral state (Figure 3(aiv)). To demonstrate the roles of Pd-functionalization, output voltages of the sensor without Pd-functionalized surface were first investigated (Figure 3b). When the non Pd-functionalized ITO and PET surfaces are contacted, it exhibits constant output voltage for varying H2 gas concentration from 0% to 5%. Since both PET and ITO do not react with H2 molecules, the output voltage signals were solely determined by the initial triboelectric sequence difference between them. Next, the output signals between Pd-functionalized ITO surface and PET were examined as a function of different exposing H2 concentrations. Differently from the non-functionalized device, it can be clearly noticed that the output voltages of the sensor are increased in proportion to H2 exposure (Figure 3c). The sensor output is more linearly increased up to 1% H2 exposure. However, the sensor response is rather saturated when the H2 concentration exceeds 2%. The observed behavior is consistent with other Pd-based hydrogen gas sensor [11,14]. Thus, Pd-functionalization plays a key role in triboelectric H2 detection. In Figure 3d, the energy band structure of the sensor is drawn to explain the increase of triboelectric output voltage with exposure to H2. The work function (WF) of Pd is ~5.2 eV and thus its Fermi level is located slightly above the midgap of PET [30]. As a result, when the two surfaces are contacted, carriers in valence and conduction bands of PET cannot be responsible for observed triboelectric charge exchange between the two surfaces. Therefore, the surface states must play an important role in contact electrifications between the two materials. Here, when the Pd-coated ITO surface is contact-electrified against the PET surface, Pd is negatively charged while PET is positively charged. This indicates that there must be donor states (0.55 and 0.85 eV below conduction band) near the midgap of PET, located slightly above the Fermi level of Pd [31]. As Pd is being exposed to H2, H2 molecules are dissociated and absorbed in the Pd lattice, forming PdHx (palladium hydride). When PdHx is formed, its WF becomes smaller than that of Pd [32]. Consequently, as the WF of PdHx moves more close to donor states in PET, the charge exchange between two materials can be more effective, which enhances surface charge exchange and leads to increase in triboelectric output voltage of the sensor. Therefore, triboelectric output voltage will be continuously increased until H2 concentration reaches a certain level.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) Triboelectric generation mechanism. (initial state) There is no charge on both surfaces. (i) contacted state: charge separation between the two surfaces by contact electrification; (ii) releasing state: differently charged contact surface induces charge flows between the top and bottom electrodes; (iii) separated state: charge neutral state is reached; (iv) pressing state: electrical equilibrium state breaks again and induced charges flow in opposite direction; (b) Triboelectric output voltages from non Pd-functionalized ITO and PET contact pair. There is no output voltage change since Pd does not react with H2 gas; (c) Triboelectric output voltage of the H2 gas sensor with a Pd-functionalized ITO and PET contact pair in varying H2 concentrations. The output voltage sublinearly increases until H2 concentration reaches 1%. The output voltages are saturated above 3% H2 concentration; (d) Energy band diagrams of contact surfaces. Work function (WF) of Pd moves close to donor surface states (E0) of PET as PdHx is formed, increasing surface charge exchange.

To verify reproducible output performance of the H2 sensor, the device was measured while repeatedly being exposed to different concentrations of H2 (up to 1% H2) (Figure 4a). Similar output voltages were measured during the repeated measurement. The magnified output signals in Figure 4a show alternating peaks due to the triboelectric induction mechanism described in Figure 3a. Next, sensor response and recovery time were measured while exposing under 1% hydrogen, exhibiting the response and recovery time of ~30 min and ~15 min, respectively (Figure 3b). In addition, the effect of relative humidity (RH) on the sensor output was also measured. It can be noticed that the output voltage is obviously reduced when the RH is increased from 47% to 65%, negatively affecting triboelectric output voltage. Lastly, the sensor responses were calculated from multiple devices and plotted as a function of exposing H2 concentrations (Figure 4d). Here, the sensor responses were calculated using the equation ∆V/V0, where V0 is the output voltage measured while being exposed to dry air, Vs is the output voltage under exposure to a specific H2 concentration, and ∆V (= Vs − V0) is a relative output voltage change between two states. A gradual increase of sensor response can be noticed as H2 concentration increases. We also note that the sensor response was more widely varied when the H2 concentration exceeds 2%. Using the obtained sensor responses, the sensitivity of the hydrogen sensor is subsequently extracted, where the sensitivity is calculated using the equation, S=d(∆V/V0)d([H2]). Up to 1% H2 exposures, higher sensitivity, 0.75, was obtained. Above 2% H2 exposures, on the other hand, the sensitivity is reduced to 0.2, indicating the saturation of H2 molecules absorption in Pd lattice above this level.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

(a) Reproducible sensor responses. Similar outputs are repeatedly measured when the sensor is repeatedly exposed to H2; (b) Sensor response and recovery time under 1% hydrogen exposure; (c) Humidity effect on sensor output performance; (d) Sensor responses (ΔV/V0) under exposure to different concentrations of H2.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Measurement and Characterization

Triboelectric output voltages were measured while exposing the device in different H2 gas concentrations. We maintained total flux of dry air and H2 as 200 sccm. For each H2 concentration, the sample was exposed to each H2 concentration for 30 min, which is sufficient reaction time for Pd in the presence of H2 gas. Different concentrations of H2 were introduced into the chamber by mixing with dry air at the specific ratios using mass flow control (MFC) units. For all measurement, a constant force of 0.1 MPa was applied using the custom-made pushing machine installed inside of a gas chamber at a frequency of 0.5 Hz and the distance between two electrodes was kept as 3.5 cm. The output voltages from the sensor were measured by connecting to the oscilloscope (Waverunner 2 LT 354, Lecroy, Chestnut Ridge, NY, USA). The Pd-coated layer was characterized by using both TEM (JEM-ARM200F, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and EDS (HD-2300A, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) before gas sensing measurement.

3.2. Fabrication of Triboelectric H2 Gas Sensor

For fabrication of triboelectric H2 gas sensors, the surface of ITO (130 nm)-coated PET (130 μm) film (Sigma Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany) was first cleaned with IPA, acetone, and DI water, respectively, followed by N2 blow dry. After cleaning the film, Pd (10 nm) was thermally evaporated on an ITO surface of the film. Next, the counter contact surface, consisting of PET/ITO film, was prepared. Here, Pd-coated ITO surface was contact-electrified with the PET side of the counter contact surface. Electrical connection between ITO electrodes of the two friction surfaces was made using copper wires. For electrical connection of the ITO surface and copper line as an electrode, the electrode was soldered by soldering with silver paste. Each prepared surface was then mounted on the custom-made pushing machine installed inside a gas test chamber.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we demonstrated self-powered H2 gas sensor utilizing triboelectric effects. Due to WF change of Pd-coated surface in the presence of H2, triboelectric output voltage of the sensor was varied proportionally. Using this mechanism, different concentrations of H2 were detected during contact electrification between two friction surfaces without using an external battery. Specifically, the output voltage of H2 sensor was increased in proportion to H2 concentration. The WF of PdHx moves close to a donor state of PET, and the charge transfer between the two friction surfaces can be facilitated. Triboelectric H2 sensor demonstrated reproducible and sensitive responses up to 1% H2. The approach introduced here can be easily adopted to development of triboelectric gas sensors detecting other gas species and other self-powered electronics devices.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2015R1A1A1A05027235), the support of KIMM (Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials) research grant (NK 196E), and the research fund of Chungnam National University 2015.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:

H2 Hydrogen
Pd Palladium
PdHx Palladium Hydride
IPA Isopropyl Alcohol
DI water Deionized Water
ITO Indium Tin Oxide
PET Polyethylene Terephthalate
TEM Transmission Electron Microscopy
EDS Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy
MFC Mass Flow Control
WF Work Function
Open in a new tab

Author Contributions

Junghyo Nah conceived and designed the experiments; Yang Hyeog Kwon, Sung-Ho Shin, and Young-Hwan Kim performed the experiments; Junghyo Nah, Yang Hyeog Kwon, Joo-Yun Jung, and Young-Hwan Kim analyzed the data; Junghyo Nah, Sung-Ho Shin, and Yang Hyeog Kwon wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  • 1.Jacobson M.Z., Colella W.G., Golden D.M. Cleaning the air and improving health with hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles. Science. 2005;308:1901–1905. doi: 10.1126/science.1109157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Service R.F. The hydrogen backlash. Science. 2004;305:958–961. doi: 10.1126/science.305.5686.958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hübert T., Boon-Brett L., Black G., Banach U. Hydrogen sensors—A review. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011;157:329–352. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2011.04.070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chung M.G., Kim D.-H., Seo D.K., Kim T., Im H.U., Lee H.M., Yoo J.-B., Hong S.-H., Kang T.J., Kim Y.H. Flexible hydrogen sensors using graphene with palladium nanoparticle decoration. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012;169:387–392. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2012.05.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Liekhus K.J., Zlochower I.A., Cashdollar K.L., Djordjevic S.M., Loehr C.A. Flammability of gas mixtures containing volatile organic compounds and hydrogen. J. Loss Prev. Proc. 2000;13:377–384. doi: 10.1016/S0950-4230(99)00034-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Wong Y.M., Kang W.P., Davidson J.L., Wisitsora-At A., Soh K.L. A novel microelectronic gas sensor utilizing carbon nanotubes for hydrogen gas detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2003;93:327–332. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00213-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Shin W., Matsumiya M., Izu N., Murayama N. Hydrogen-selective thermoelectric gas sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2003;93:304–308. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4005(03)00225-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaniyoor A., Imran Jafri R., Arockiadoss T., Ramaprabhu S. Nanostructured Pt decorated graphene and multi walled carbon nanotube based room temperature hydrogen gas sensor. Nanoscale. 2009;1:382–386. doi: 10.1039/b9nr00015a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Han C.-H., Hong D.-W., Han S.-D., Gwak J., Singh K.C. Catalytic combustion type hydrogen gas sensor using TiO2 and UV-LED. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2007;125:224–228. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2007.02.017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kiefer T., Salette A., Villanueva L.G., Brugger J. Large arrays of chemo-mechanical nanoswitches for ultralow-power hydrogen sensing. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2010;20 doi: 10.1088/0960-1317/20/10/105019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jang B., Lee K.Y., Noh J.-S., Lee W. Nanogap-based electrical hydrogen sensors fabricated from Pd-PMMA hybrid thin films. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2014;193:530–535. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2013.11.080. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lee J., Shim W., Lee E., Noh J.S., Lee W. Highly mobile palladium thin films on an elastomeric substrate: Nanogap-based hydrogen gas sensors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:5301–5305. doi: 10.1002/anie.201100054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Sil D., Hines J., Udeoyo U., Borguet E. Palladium nanoparticle-based surface acoustic wave hydrogen sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;7:5709–5714. doi: 10.1021/am507531s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jakubik W.P., Urbanczyk M.W., Kochowski S., Bodzenta J. Bilayer structure for hydrogen detection in a surface acoustic wave sensor system. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2002;82:265–271. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4005(01)01061-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kim K.S., Chung G.S. Fast response hydrogen sensors based on palladium and platinum/porous 3C-SiC Schottky diodes. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2011;160:1232–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2011.09.054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen H.-I., Chou Y.-I., Chu C.-Y. A novel high-sensitive Pd/InP hydrogen sensor fabricated by electroless plating. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2002;85:10–18. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4005(02)00044-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Tittl A., Mai P., Taubert R., Dregely D., Liu N., Giessen H. Palladium-based plasmonic perfect absorber in the visible wavelength range and its application to hydrogen sensing. Nano Lett. 2011;11:4366–4369. doi: 10.1021/nl202489g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Chadwick B., Tann J., Brungs M., Gal M. A hydrogen sensor-based on the optical-generation of surface-plasmons in a Palladium Alloy. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 1994;17:215–220. doi: 10.1016/0925-4005(93)00875-Y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Gurlo A., Clarke D.R. High-sensitivity hydrogen detection: Hydrogen-induced swelling of multiple cracked palladium films on compliant substrates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2011;50:10130–10132. doi: 10.1002/anie.201103845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Fan F.R., Tian Z.Q., Wang Z.L. Flexible triboelectric generator! Nano Energy. 2012;1:328–334. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2012.01.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Fan F.-R., Lin L., Zhu G., Wu W., Zhang R., Wang Z.L. Transparent triboelectric nanogenerators and self-powered pressure sensors based on micropatterned plastic films. Nano Lett. 2012;12:3109–3114. doi: 10.1021/nl300988z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Zhu G., Chen J., Zhang T., Jing Q., Wang Z.L. Radial-arrayed rotary electrification for high performance triboelectric generator. Nat. Commun. 2014;5 doi: 10.1038/ncomms4426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Jeong C.K., Baek K.M., Niu S., Nam T.W., Hur Y.H., Park D.Y., Hwang G.-T., Byun M., Wang Z.L., Jung Y.S., et al. Topographically-designed triboelectric nanogenerator via block copolymer self-assembly. Nano Lett. 2014;14:7031–7038. doi: 10.1021/nl503402c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kwon Y.H., Shin S.-H., Jung J.-Y., Nah J. Scalable and enhanced triboelectric output power generation by surface functionalized nanoimprint patterns. Nanotechnology. 2016;27 doi: 10.1088/0957-4484/27/20/205401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kwon Y.H., Shin S.-H., Kim Y.-H., Jung J.-Y., Lee M.H., Nah J. Triboelectric contact surface charge modulation and piezoelectric charge inducement using polarized composite thin film for performance enhancement of triboelectric generators. Nano Energy. 2016;25:225–231. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Shin S.-H., Kwon Y.H., Kim Y.-H., Jung J.-Y., Lee M.H., Nah J. Triboelectric charging sequence induced by surface functionalization as a method to fabricate high performance triboelectric generators. ACS Nano. 2015;9:4621–4627. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.5b01340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Zhang H., Yang Y., Su Y., Chen J., Hu C., Wu Z., Liu Y., Wong P.W., Bando Y., Wang Z.L. Triboelectric nanogenerator as self-powered active sensors for detecting liquid/gaseous water/ethanol. Nano Energy. 2013;2:693–701. doi: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2013.08.004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Uddin A.S.M.I., Chung G.-S. A self-powered active hydrogen gas sensor with fast response at room temperature based on triboelectric effect. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2016;231:601–608. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.03.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Horn R.G., Smith D.T. Contact electrification and adhesion between dissimilar materials. Science. 1992;256:362–364. doi: 10.1126/science.256.5055.362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Harms U., Schwarz R.B. Anomalous modulus and work function at the interfaces of thin films. Phys. Rev. B. 2002;2:085409. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.085409. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lowell J., Rose-Innes A.C. Contact electrification. Adv. Phys. 1980;29:947–1023. doi: 10.1080/00018738000101466. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Grattan K.T.V. Physics, chemistry & technology of solid state gas sensor devices. J. Mod. Opt. 1995;42:1553. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Nanomaterials are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES