Skip to main content
PMC home page
Physiological Reports logoLink to Physiological Reports
. 2017 Jan 5;5(1):e13000. doi: 10.14814/phy2.13000

Corticotropin‐releasing hormone improves survival in pneumococcal pneumonia by reducing pulmonary inflammation

Brittney Burnley 1, Harlan P Jones 1,✉
PMCID: PMC5256152  PMID: 28057851

Abstract

The use of glucocorticoids to reduce inflammatory responses is largely based on the knowledge of the physiological action of the endogenous glucocorticoid, cortisol. Corticotropin‐releasing hormone (CRH) is a neuropeptide released from the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis of the central nervous system. This hormone serves as an important mediator of adaptive physiological responses to stress. In addition to its role in inducing downstream cortisol release that in turn regulates immune suppression, CRH has also been found to mediate inflammatory responses in peripheral tissues. Streptococcus pneumoniae is a microorganism commonly present among the commensal microflora along the upper respiratory tract. Transmission of disease stems from the resident asymptomatic pneumococcus along the nasal passages. Glucocorticoids are central mediators of immune suppression and are the primary adjuvant pharmacological treatment used to reduce inflammatory responses in patients with severe bacterial pneumonia. However, controversy exists in the effectiveness of glucocorticoid treatment in reducing mortality rates during S. pneumoniae infection. In this study, we compared the effect of the currently utilized pharmacologic glucocorticoid dexamethasone with CRH. Our results demonstrated that intranasal administration of CRH increases survival associated with a decrease in inflammatory cellular immune responses compared to dexamethasone independent of neutrophils. Thus, providing evidence of its use in the management of immune and inflammatory responses brought on by severe pneumococcal infection that could reduce mortality risks.

Keywords: Corticotropin‐releasing hormone, glucocorticoids, inflammation, neuropeptides, Streptococcus pneumoniae

Introduction

The use of glucocorticoids to reduce inflammatory responses is largely based on the knowledge of the physiological action of the endogenous glucocorticoid, cortisol. Glucocorticoids can exert their immunosuppressive properties on both cells and its cellular environment (e.g., proteins, membranes, and organelles) (Culpitt et al. 1999). In response to infection, cortisol secretion from the adrenal glands acts in part as a global suppressor of immune and inflammatory responses. This mechanism protects against extended tissue damage and restores homeostatic conditions. However, its use can also result in an increased risk to secondary infections caused by a nonspecific immune suppression.

Cortisol is a human glucocorticoid whose release is mediated by corticotropin‐releasing hormone (CRH). CRH is a neuropeptide released from the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) axis of the central nervous system. This hormone serves as an important mediator of adaptive physiological responses to stress (e.g., physical, psychological, and environmental). In addition to its role in inducing downstream cortisol release that in turn regulates immune suppression, CRH has also been found at peripheral sites of inflammation (Saunders et al. 2002; Ganceviciene et al. 2009; Rassouli et al. 2011). Previous findings suggest that CRH, through its ligation to its receptors, can modulate cellular immune and inflammatory responses (Sternberg et al. 1992; De Miguel et al. 2011; Sasayama et al. 2011; Wang et al. 2012). However, its mechanisms of action on cellular immune function remain unclear. Importantly, few studies have demonstrated how CRH may impact innate pulmonary immune defenses against bacterial infections (e.g., Streptococcus pneumoniae) (Murray et al. 2001; Gonzales et al. 2008; Kim et al. 2011). Determining the mechanism of action of CRH on particular inflammatory cells will provide a novel understanding of mechanisms mediating cellular immune inflammatory responses caused by severe bacterial infections.

Streptococcus pneumoniae is a microorganism commonly present among the commensal microflora along the upper respiratory tract. Among the 92 known serotypes of S. pneumoniae, few are considered pathogenic. Rather, transmission of disease stems from the resident asymptomatic pneumococcus along the nasal passages. Still a majority of deaths are due to complications from respiratory pneumonia caused by S. pneumoniae (De Pascale et al. 2011; Rodgers and Klugman 2011; Jinno and Jacobs 2012). For many years, routine vaccination, antibiotic use, and adjunctive therapies have proven efficacious in certain settings and for certain groups. For example, immunization programs have proven successful in reducing pneumonia and are predicted to reduce child mortality by 30% by 2015 globally (Boyce et al. 1995; Frei et al. 2011). However, the emergence of virulent serotypes not covered by current vaccines and the notable rise in antibiotic resistance raises concern for increased mortality risk caused by S. pneumoniae.

Individuals particularly at risk include the very young (<6 months to 3 years), the elderly (>65 years), and the individuals with chronic disease (e.g., emphysema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, immunodeficiency) (Sternberg and Licinio 1995; Almagro et al. 2012). The risk associated with these groups is believed to be in part due to their lack of immune competency. During the early stages of S. pneumoniae infection, robust innate cellular immune and inflammatory responses play a critical role in eradicating S. pneumoniae from the lower respiratory tract as the host's response in preventing persistent infection and disseminating systemic disease. However, under conditions whereby the host immune response fails to clear the ensuing infection, immune‐mediated inflammatory responses can have detrimental effects, particularly where antibiotic treatment is also ineffective. To avoid such outcomes, suppression of inflammatory responses through glucocorticoids is used as an adjunctive therapy during severe infection (Refojo and Holsboer 2009; Wunderink 2009). Dexamethasone is a common adjuvant therapy used to reduce inflammatory responses in patients with bacterial pneumonia (Jain et al. 1991; Jessop et al. 2001; Adcock et al. 2012; Vlahos et al. 2012). The purpose of suppressing inflammatory responses during severe infection is to avoid tissue damage, leading to both sepsis and death. Streptococcus pneumoniae‐associated sepsis occurs by dissemination from the initial site of infection (e.g., the lung) due to tissue injury caused by severe inflammatory reactions leading to bacteremia in blood. Although dexamethasone is commonly used in cases of severe bacterial infections (e.g., meningitis, community‐acquired pneumonia), controversy exists in its effectiveness in reducing mortality rates during S. pneumoniae infection (Silverman et al. 2004; O'Kane et al. 2006; Rodgers and Klugman 2011; Schuster et al. 2012). This study will determine the role of CRH and dexamethasone in mediating mortality, and how they influence inflammatory responses during pneumococcal infection.

Materials and Methods

Animals

Adult (6–8 weeks of age) female CD‐1 mice (Harlan Sprague Dawley, Indianapolis, IN) were used in all studies. Mice were maintained under specific pathogen‐free conditions on a 12:12‐h light/dark cycle (7:00 pm–7:00 am). Mice were kept under optimal temperature and humidity controlled conditions. The University of North Texas Health Science Center's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) approved these studies.

Intranasal infection and administration of pharmacologic agents

Streptococcus pneumoniae strain #6301 (ATCC, Manassas, VA) was grown for 16 h to obtain mid‐log phase cultures on blood agar plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Lenexa, KS). Mice were infected with 1 × 105 colony‐forming units (CFUs) (LD50) of S. pneumoniae strain #6301 (ATCC, Manassas, VA) by intranasal route in a volume of 40 μL of brain–heart infusion broth (EMD Chemicals, Inc., Gibbtown, NJ) or broth (e.g., sham infection) after anesthesia (100–150 μL ketamine/xylazine intraperitoneally).

Human corticotropin‐releasing hormone, antalarmin, and dexamethasone were from Sigma‐Aldrich, St. Louis, MO. Optimal doses of CRH (1 mg/kg), antalarmin (1 mg/kg), and dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) were administered by intranasal route based on previous published results (Kim et al. 2011).

Brochoalveolar lavage fluid isolation

Brochoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was prepared by intratracheal perfusion of 1 mL of sterile 1× phosphate‐buffered saline (PBS) solution using a 25‐gauge (G) blunt‐end needle. After removing cells by centrifugation, the total number of leukocytes were collected from BALF. BALF cells were quantified by viable cell trypan blue staining and hemocytometer techniques using light microscopy under 40× magnification. The noncellular BALF samples were stored at −80°C until analysis.

CXCL1 chemokine detection in the BALF

CXCL1 chemokine and IL‐17A production was determined by sandwich ELISA method from BALF. All procedures were performed as described by the manufacturer (R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN). Briefly, flat‐bottomed 96‐well plates were coated with an optimal titration of capture antibody followed by overnight blocking using 10% FBS in PBS to deter nonspecific binding. After incubation of samples at 4°C for 16 h, plates were incubated with biotin‐conjugated detection antibody and streptavidin–HRP (horseradish peroxidase). Tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) peroxidase substrate solution (Rockland Immunochemicals, Inc., Gilbertsville, PA) was added to each well for colorimetric determination of concentration of each cytokine according to standard curve generated by reference concentration of cytokine at a wavelength of 450 nm detected by colorimetric plate reader (Bioteck Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT). ELISA antibody sets and recombinant cytokines were purchased from R&D Systems, Inc., Minneapolis, MN.

Neutrophil depletion

Twenty‐four hours prior to infection, all treatment groups were administered a single injection of 0.5 mg of 1A8 neutralizing monoclonal antibody (Bio X cell, West Lebanon, NH) in a 200‐μL volume intraperitoneally. The neutralizing antibody was prepared in 1× PBS immediately preceding administration to animals. Efficiency of neutrophil depletion was confirmed by flow cytometry using LY6G antibody labeling of lung leukocytes. The average percent depletion of LY6G+ lung leukocytes from mice administered the 1A8 neutralizing antibody was 97.3 ± 2.3% (n = 5 mice per group). LY6G+ staining of lung leukocytes isolated from control mice administered IgG isotype‐matched antibody was 3.8 ± 1.2% (n = 5 mice per group) as determined by analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism version 5.0p (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA) and Stata 14 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX). Log‐rank (Mantel–Cox) test was used for survival analysis. For multiexperimental group analysis, data were subjected to one‐way ANOVA. For two‐group comparisons, two‐sample proportion test was used. All data are expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). The two‐tailed level of significance was set to a P ≤ 0.05 for group difference.

Results

Reducing bacterial burden within a patient diagnosed with pneumococcal pneumonia is the main objective when determining treatment. However, during severe infection, the inability to clear infections due to deficient immune responses and ineffective antimicrobial treatment can lead to unwanted inflammatory reactions that require adjunctive anti‐inflammatory therapy. Under such circumstances, dexamethasone use has been shown to be less effective in reducing mortality risks among patients with infectious pneumonia (Ganceviciene et al. 2009; De Pascale et al. 2011; Meijvis et al. 2011). Our laboratory has previously demonstrated that intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of antalarmin, a CRHR1‐specific antagonist reduces survival using a model of aversive stress plus S. pneumoniae infection (Kim et al. 2011). Although changes in disease outcome were seen when antagonists were administered i.p., no studies have investigated how targeting CRH and CRHR1 activity in the respiratory tract impacts disease outcome. Using an experimental model of murine respiratory S. pneumoniae infection, we compared sham‐treated mice to experimental groups of mice receiving intranasal administration of CRH, a CRHR1‐selective antagonist (antalarmin) or dexamethasone (Fig. 1). Dexamethasone is the pharmacologic glucocorticoid analog currently used clinically (Calogero et al. 1991; Kruisbeek 2001; Mogensen et al. 2008).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Experimental design. All mice were infected with 1 × 105 colony‐forming units (CFUs) of Streptococcus pneumoniae by intranasal route. Selected groups of mice were administered PBS (placebo), antalarmin (1 mg/kg), CRH (1 mg/kg), or dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) by intranasal route at designated time points 9 h (A), 18 h (B), and 30 h (C). Selected groups of mice were sacrificed 6 h after administration of drug for analysis. Additional groups of mice were monitored for survival.

Initial studies investigated the time‐associated effect of CRH administration during pneumococcal infection. Figure 2 shows the results of a survival study where groups were administered treatment at 9 (A), 18 (B), or 30 (C) h following infection. As shown in Figure 2A, survival was greatest among untreated mice. However, no significant differences in mortality rates were observed between experimental groups compared to sham‐treated mice. In contrast, mice administered CRH 18 h after infection resulted in a significantly higher survivorship compared to all experimental groups. Interestingly, intranasal administration of antalarmin significantly reduced the protective effect of CRH, suggesting that endogenous ligation of CRH to its cognate receptor CRHR1 could be mediating responses during pneumococcal infection (Fig. 2B). No significant differences in outcome were found between experimental groups at 30 h (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Time‐dependent administration of CRH effect on survival. Groups were administered antalarmin (1 mg/kg) CRH (1 mg/kg) or dexamethasone at a concentration of 1 mg/kg. All groups were compared with the infection‐only group that received placebo treatment (A) 9 h after infection, (B) 18 h after infection, and (C) 30 h after infection. n = 10 mice/group; **P ≤ 0.05 ANOVA or no significance. Software: Graph Prism.

We next tested the hypothesis that survival is predicted by the type of cellular inflammatory response produced during infection given intranasal administration of CRH. We determined the leukocyte response to respiratory S. pneumoniae infection by enumerating the total leukocyte numbers in the BALF given intranasal administration of CRH, antalarmin, or dexamethasone. Mice administered CRH demonstrated a significant decrease in total leukocyte numbers compared to sham‐treated mice as well as mice administered dexamethasone. Accordingly, administration of antalarmin led to a significantly higher increase in the total leukocyte count compared to CRH and infection alone. Thus, affirming endogenous CRH ligation to CRHR1 as a mechanism of action (Fig. 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Corticotropin‐releasing hormone decreases total leukocyte numbers in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). CRH (1 mg/kg), antalarmin (1 mg/kg), or dexamethasone (1 mg/kg) was administered by intranasal route 18 h after infection. Total leukocytes numbers were determined in BALF of naïve and experimental groups of mice (n = 5). **Significant differences from all experimental groups, P ≤ 0.05. *Significant differences between experimental groups determined by ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05. Software: Graph Prism.

The above results suggest that CRH through triggering of CRHR1 could be a mechanism controlling cellular recruitment. CXCL1 is a chemokine released after the activation of epithelial cells and has been shown to preferentially lead to the recruitment of monocyte populations during pulmonary infection. We therefore determined how CRH and blocking its receptor would impact CXCL1 production along the respiratory airways. We found significantly lower levels of CXCL1 in the BALF among mice given CRH. Importantly, administration of the CRHR1‐selective antagonist antalarmin significantly increased CXCL1 levels below that found in the BALF of infected untreated mice and mice receiving dexamethasone (Fig. 4). These results demonstrate a relationship between CXCL1‐mediated neutrophil/monocyte recruitment and a CRH/CRHR1 mode of action. IL‐17A is also an important mediator of monocyte (e.g., macrophages, and neutrophils) recruitment along the respiratory tract (Zizzo and Cohen 2013; Bi et al. 2014). However, IL‐17A was not detected in the BALF among all experimental groups (data not shown).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Production of CXCL1 in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) decreases with CRH. Naïve or following treatment, BALF was harvested from mice for chemokine evaluation. Using ELISA, CXCL1 production was evaluated. n = 5, statistical significance indicated by *. **Significant differences from all experimental groups, P ≤ 0.05. *Significant differences between experimental groups determined by ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05. Software: Graph Prism.

Neutrophils and monocyte/macrophage cells play a major role in mediating respiratory bacterial infections including S. pneumoniae (Whale and Griebel 2009; Costantini et al. 2011). Most intriguing of these immune cell types are their complex functional roles including the induction of potent proinflammatory and oxidative stress responses as well as their capacity to mediate anti‐inflammatory responses involved in disease resolution (Vakharia and Hinson 2005; Zhao et al. 2009). We have previously demonstrated a role for CRH in modulating leukocyte responses in lungs given restraint stress and S. pneumoniae infection (Kim et al. 2011). Specifically, those findings demonstrated divergent effects of CRH receptor antagonism on the influence of neutrophil and monocyte/macrophage infiltration to the lungs in response to infection. Due to their significant involvement in mediation pneumococcal infection, neutrophil depletion studies were performed to ascertain the potential relationship between CRH and neutrophil‐mediated responses associated with disease outcome. Figure 5 demonstrated that survival could be significantly increased by CRH administration in immunocompetent mice. Interestingly, CRH administration in the absence of neutrophils resulted in the highest survival rate compared to all experimental conditions. This suggests that CRH's mode of action on neutrophil function may in part be a determinant of mortality risks (Fig. 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Elimination of neutrophils enhances survival with CRH. Mice were administered placebo or 1A8 neutralizing antibody (0.5 mg) by intraperitoneal route 1 day prior to Streptococcus pneumoniae infection (1 × 105 CFU). Selected groups received CRH (1 mg/kg) by intranasal route 18 h after infection. All groups were compared with the infection‐only group that received placebo treatment. Data represent n = 5 or 10 mice/group. *Significant differences between experimental groups determined by Kaplan–Meier, P ≤ 0.05. Software: Graph Prism.

Discussion

Corticotropin‐releasing hormone is produced by the HPA. Its ability to influence immune function is commonly associated with the release of adrenal corticotropic hormone (ACTH) from the adrenal glands, resulting in cortisol release that in turn translates into nonspecific immune suppression (Rodgers and Klugman 2011). Alternatively, CRH is also secreted in peripheral tissues (e.g., synovial tissue, gastrointestinal tract, placenta), where it is believed to modulate cellular immune and inflammatory responses through preferences in CRH receptors 1 and 2 activity (Peracoli et al. 2011; Zhu et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2014). To date, few studies have defined the role of CRH in the regulation of pulmonary cellular immune and inflammatory responses (O'Kane et al. 2006). A previous study also demonstrated that preferences in CRH receptor expression could be associated with asthma severity (Drescher and Bai 2013). We have previously determined that i.p. injection of CRH receptor antagonists can modulate severity of pneumococcal pneumonia in the presence of aversive stress. The results from this study demonstrate for the first time the protective effect of intranasal CRH administration through modulation of cellular inflammatory responses across the respiratory tract.

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading causative agent of community‐acquired pneumonia worldwide and is responsible for the highest mortality rates among the elderly, young, and immunocompromised (De Pascale et al. 2011). In addition to antibiotic resistance, aberrant immune and inflammatory responses are believed to be a key determinant of disease outcome (Culpitt et al. 1999). Specifically, studies have documented uncontrolled inflammatory reactions produced by neutrophils and monocytes to be active participants in exacerbated responses in an effort to eradicate S. pneumoniae infection (Pichichero and Almudevar 2016). We hypothesized that targeting CRH‐mediated effects to the respiratory tract will predict disease outcome through modulation of immune and inflammatory responses. Initial studies determined the timing of intranasal CRH administration following S. pneumoniae infection to effect survival. Figure 2A–C demonstrate the effect of intranasal administration of CRH on survival when given at 9, 18, and 30 h after S. pneumoniae infection, respectively. Figure 2A shows that CRH as well as dexamethasone administered at 9 h has no significant effect on survival compared to untreated mice. This outcome suggests that host responses presumably innate cellular mechanisms of immune defense are unresponsive to CRH and dexamethasone administered at this time point of S. pneumoniae infection. Our finding that administration of the CRHR1‐selective antagonist antalarmin also did not impact outcome suggests that endogenous CRH is at most having a negligible role during the early stages of infection, supportive of CRH's inability to impact survival given 9 h after infection. In contrast, Figure 2B demonstrates a significant protective effect of CRH administered at 18 h after infection compared to dexamethasone which demonstrated the lowest survival outcome. Furthermore, in that no significant differences in survival were demonstrated between all experimental groups when CRH, dexamethasone, or antalarmin was administered at 30 h further illustrates the significance in defining the specificity of temporal host responses against S. pneumoniae infection as a determinant of CRH's protective efficacy. Thus, the influence of CRH could be predicted by the type and intensity of inflammatory mediators involved during specific times of an ensuing infection. We have previously shown that blocking CRH–CRHR1 activity by i.p. injection improves survival in mice subjected to S. pneumoniae infection under aversive restraint stress (Kim et al. 2011). This finding contrasts with our current findings suggesting that route of administration (e.g., nasal vs. i.p.) can define CRH's mode of action. One potential explanation could be the distinct differences known between mucosal immune environment and that of systemic immune responses. Future studies are required for in‐depth determination of preferential CRH receptor expression along respiratory and nonmucosal tissues.

Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of identifying the optimal window of therapeutic efficacy pertaining to pharmacologic use in the management of aberrant inflammatory responses (Calogero et al. 1991; Meijvis et al. 2011; Skrupky et al. 2011). A robust cellular immune response is absolutely required in early host protection against invading S. pneumoniae infection (Huang et al. 2016; Pichichero and Almudevar 2016; Vissers et al. 2016). Therefore, studies were performed to correlate cellular immune responses against S. pneumoniae with survival given intranasal administration of CRH. In that, intranasal administration of CRH significantly reduced the number of total leukocytes found in the BALF compared to untreated mice demonstrates CRH's ability to modulate cellular inflammatory responses (Fig. 3). Conversely, intranasal administration of the CRHR1 antagonist antalarmin significantly increased leukocytes numbers. Thus, reinforcing CRH's role as a modulator of respiratory cellular responses based on CRHR1 specificity of action. Interestingly, intranasal administration of dexamethasone did not reduce total BALF numbers. If fact, BALF leukocyte numbers in dexamethasone‐treated mice were higher than untreated mice. Chemotactic factors play a major role in cellular recruitment and therefore are critical determinants of inflammatory responses. One possible mechanism through which CRH may mediate cellular immune responses could be the regulation of chemokine function. To further substantiate the role of CRH as a mediator of immune and inflammatory responses along respiratory tissues, we compared the level of CXCL‐1 and IL‐17A in the BALF between naïve (control) and experimental groups (infection and/or treated animals). CXCL‐1 and IL‐17A are preferential mediators involved in the recruitment of neutrophils and monocyte subpopulations to sites of infection (Bigorgne et al. 2016). Although IL‐17A was not detected in BALF, Figure 4 shows that infected mice administered CRH at 18 h results in a significant decrease in CXCL1. This finding correlated with CRH‐induced decrease in total BALF leukocytes, demonstrating a mechanistic link between CRH and cellular immune and inflammatory responses associated with respiratory S. pneumoniae infection. Such findings are impactful in light of the importance in managing inflammatory reactions during severe pneumococcal disease, particularly for at‐risk populations. These findings suggest that CRH was more effective in inducing an anti‐inflammatory phenotype than dexamethasone, a known suppressor of inflammatory responses. While inhaled glucocorticoids have proven therapeutic in management of respiratory inflammatory disease (McKeever et al. 2013; Poulos et al. 2013; Finney et al. 2014), CRH may also be an effective alternative. Future studies that determine the influences of CRH on the broader array of cytokine and chemokine mediators will provide further understanding of how CRH and its cognate receptors could be useful in manipulating pro‐ versus anti‐inflammatory responses.

There is emerging debate of whether neutrophils are absolutely necessary to purge the system of foreign invaders during early pneumococcal infection (Peracoli et al. 2011; Sutherland et al. 2014), or if neutrophils have a greater potential to promote detrimental effects during early pneumococcal infection (Balamayooran et al. 2010; Costantini et al. 2011; Isailovic et al. 2015). The generation of the 1A8 neutrophil‐neutralizing antibody (Verbanac et al. 1993) affords the ability to distinguish the roles of neutrophils against bacterial infection. Here, we took advantage of the 1A8 antibody to determine the contribution of neutrophils in survival against pneumococcal infection and whether its influence could be linked to CRH's protective role. In that, depletion of neutrophils did not result in a significant difference in overall survival compared to neutrophil‐competent mice raises an important question relating their contribution to protection against pneumococcal infection. In support, previous studies have raised a similar argument related to their role against S. pneumoniae and other respiratory infectious disease. For example, Cooper et al. suggest that the requirement for neutrophils in protection against pneumococcal infection may depend on disease severity (Herrod 1984; Cooper et al. 2013; Drescher and Bai 2013). Consistent with Figure 2, intranasal administration of CRH to neutrophil‐competent mice increased survival compared to untreated mice. Most intriguing, however, was the observation that CRH administration compensated for the absence of neutrophils, resulting in a significantly higher survivorship compared to neutrophil‐competent mice administered CRH. This finding suggests that neutrophils may be expendable in protection against S. pneumoniae infection. Alternatively, one might consider that the necessity of neutrophils during infection is tightly linked to disease status (e.g., bacterial burden, inflammatory condition). To date, the direct effect of CRH on neutrophils and other leukocyte populations remain largely unknown. Our preliminary studies of their influence in lung parenchymal tissue suggest that neutrophils and other monocyte lineages are responsive to CRH (our preliminary findings). Knowledge of how CRH modulates leukocyte subpopulations’ function will benefit our understanding of CRH as a mediator of anti‐inflammatory inflammatory responses.

In conclusion, our studies reveal the potential novel use of nasal delivery of CRH in control of overt inflammatory responses localized along respiratory tissues with the potential in reducing mortality risks associated with pneumococcal infection. Importantly, our results provide evidence of neutrophils’ dispensable role during pneumococcal infection, particularly when considering adjuvant therapy. To date, dexamethasone is a primary standard of care in adjuvant treatment of respiratory‐related and the management of systemic pneumococcal disease (Sutherland et al. 2014). However, its efficacy in reducing mortality, particularly for certain populations remains uncertain. For example, Remmelts et al. found that dexamethasone use among certain individuals with community‐acquired pneumonia produce very diverse cytokine responses with potential for adverse disease outcome (Remmelts et al. 2012; Sternberg et al. 1992). We believe that the development of novel approaches which tailor cellular immune and inflammatory responses is needed and a further understanding of the mechanisms through which CRH regulated immune and inflammatory responses may reveal improved adjuvant treatment that will eliminate mortality risks associated with pneumococcal infection.

Compliance and Ethical Standards

This research was supported by an institutional intramural award #RI6095 from the Office of Sponsored Research, University of North Texas Health Science Center.

Statement on the Welfare of Animals

All applicable international, national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed. All procedure performed in studies involving animals were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institution or practice at which the studies were conducted.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Burnley B., Jones H.. Corticotropin‐releasing hormone improves survival in pneumococcal pneumonia by reducing pulmonary inflammation. Physiol Rep, 5 (1), 2017, e13000, doi: 10.14814/phy2.13000

Funding Information

The authors thank Dr. Byung‐Jin Kim for his consultation in the design of neutrophil depletion experiments and the Department of Molecular and Medical Genetics of the University of North Texas Health Science Center for supporting the completion of this research.

References

  1. Adcock, I. M. , Caramori G., and Kirkham P. A.. 2012. Strategies for improving the efficacy and therapeutic ratio of glucocorticoids. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 12:246–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Almagro, P. , Cabrera F. J., Diez J., Boixeda R., Ortiz B., Murio C., et al. 2012. Comorbidities and short‐term prognosis in patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of COPD. The ESMI study. Chest 142:1126–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Balamayooran, G. , Batra S., Fessler M. B., Happel K. I., and S. Jeyaseelan . 2010. Mechanisms of neturophil accumulation in the lungs against bacteria. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 43:5–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bi, Y. , Zhou J., Yang H., Wang X., Zhang X., Wang Q., et al. 2014. IL‐17A produced by neutrophils protects against pneumonic plague through orchestrating IFN‐γ‐activated macrophage programming. J. Immunol. 192:704–713. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301687 Epub 2013 Dec 13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bigorgne, A. E. , John B., Ebrahimkhani M. R., Shimizu‐Albergine M., Campbell J. S., and Crispe I. N.. 2016. TLR4‐dependent secretion by hepatic stellate cells of the neutrophil‐chemoattractant CXCL1 mediates liver response to gut microbiota. PLoS ONE 11:e0151063. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Boyce, W. T. , Chesney M., Alkon A., Tschann J. M., Adams S., and Chesterman B., et al. 1995. Psychobiologic reactivity to stress and childhood respiratory illnesses: results of two prospective studies. Psychosom. Med. 57:411–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Calogero, A. E. , Liapi C., and Chrousos G. P.. 1991. Hypothalamic and suprahypothalamic effects of prolonged treatment with dexamethasone in the rat. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 14:277–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cooper, P. R. , Palmer L. J., and Chapple I. L.. 2013. Neutrophil extracellular traps as a new paradigm in innate immunity: friend or foe? Periodontol 2000 63:165–197. doi: 10.1111/prd.12025. Review. PMID: 23931060 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Costantini, C. , Calzetti F., Perbellini O., Micheletti A., Scarponi C., Lonardi S., et al. 2011. Human neutrophils interact with both 6‐sulfo LacNAc+ DC and NK cells to amplify NK‐derived IFN{gamma}: role of CD18, ICAM‐1, and ICAM‐3. Blood 117:1677–1686 Epub 2010 Nov 22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Culpitt, S. V. , Maziak W., Loukidis S., Nightingale J. A., Matthews J. L., and Barnes P. J.. 1999. Effect of high dose inhaled steroid on cells, cytokines and proteases in induced sputum in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 160:1635–1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. De Miguel, Z. , Vegas O., Garmendia L., Arregi A., Beitia G., and Azpiroz A.. 2011. Behavioral coping strategies in response to social stress are associated with distinct neuroendocrine, monoaminergic and immune response profiles in mice. Behav. Brain Res. 225:554–561. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. De Pascale, G. , Bello G., and Antonelli M.. 2011. Steroids in severe pneumonia: a literature review. Minerva Anestesiol. 77:902–910. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Drescher, B , and Bai F.. 2013. Neutrophil in viral infections, friend or foe? Virus Res. 171:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.virusres.2012.11.002. Epub 2012 Nov 21. Review. PMID: 23178588 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Finney, L. , Berry M., Singanayagam A., Elkin S. L., Johnston S. L., and Mallia P.. 2014. Inhaled corticosteroids and pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Lancet Respir. Med. 2:919–932. doi: 10.1016/S2213‐2600(14)70169‐9. Epub 2014 Sep 17. Review. PMID: 25240963 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Frei, C. R. , Bell A. M., Traugott K. A., Jaso T. C., Daniels K. R., Mortensen E. M., et al. 2011. A clinical pathway for community‐acquired pneumonia: an observational cohort study. BMC Infect. Dis. 11:188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Ganceviciene, R. , Graziene V., Fimmel S., and Zouboulis C. C.. 2009. Involvement of the corticotropin‐releasing hormone system in the pathogenesis of acne vulgaris. Br. J. Dermatol. 160:345–352. doi: 10.1111/j.1365‐2133.2008.08959.x Epub 2008 Dec 10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gonzales, X. F. , Deshmukh A., Pulse M., Johnson K., and Jones H. P.. 2008. Stress‐induced differences in primary and secondary resistance against bacterial sepsis corresponds with diverse corticotropin releasing hormone receptor expression by pulmonary CD11c+ MHC II+ and CD11c‐ MHC II+ APCs. Brain Behav. Immun. 22:552–564. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2007.11.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Herrod, H. G. 1984. Pulmonary defense mechanisms: friend and foe. South. Med. J. 77:1007–1009. Review. No abstract available. PMID: 6379890 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang, Y. , Wang Z., Jin C., Wang L., Zhang X., Xu W., et al. 2016. TLR2 promotes macrophage recruitment and S.pneumoniae clearance during mouse otitis media. Pediatr. Res. doi: 10.1038/pr.2016.154. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 27463737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Isailovic, N. , Daigo K., Mantovani A., and Selmi C.. 2015. Interleukin‐17 and innate immunity in infections and chronic inflammation. J. Autoimmun. 60:1–11. doi: S0896‐8411(15)00059‐1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Jain, R. , Zwickler D., Hollander C. S., Brand H., Saperstein A., and Hutchinson B., et al. 1991. Corticotropin‐releasing factor modulates the immune response to stress in the rat. Endocrinology 128:1329–1336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Jessop, D. S. , Harbuz M. S., and Lightman S. L.. 2001. CRH in chronic inflammatory stress. Peptides 22:803–807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Jinno, S. , and Jacobs M. R.. 2012. Pneumonia due to drug‐resistant streptococcus pneumonia. Curr. Infect. Dis. Rep. 14:292–299. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Kim, B. J. , Kayembe K., Simecka J. W., Pulse M., and Jones H. P.. 2011. Corticotropin‐releasing hormone receptor‐1 and 2 activity produces divergent resistance against stress‐induced pulmonary streptococcus pneumoniae infection. J. Neuroimmunol. 237:57–65. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2011.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Kruisbeek, A. M. 2001. Isolation of mouse mononuclear cells Curr Protoc Immunol. Chapter 3, Unit 3.1. doi: 10.1002/0471142735.im0301s39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, Y. , Fang X., Yuan J., Sun Z., Li C., Li R., et al. 2014. The role of corticotropin‐releasing hormone receptor 1 in the development of colitis‐associated cancer in mouse model. Endocr. Relat. Cancer 21:639–651. doi: 10.1530/ERC‐14‐0239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. McKeever, T. , Harrison T. W., Hubbard R., and Shaw D.. 2013. Inhaled corticosteroids and the risk of pneumonia in people with asthma: a case‐control study. Chest 144:1788–1794. doi: 10.1378/chest.13‐0871. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Meijvis, S. C. , Hardeman H., Remmelts H. H., Heijligenberg R., Rijkers G. T., van Velzen‐Blad H., et al. 2011. Dexamethasone and length of hospital stay in patients with community‐acquired pneumonia: a randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Lancet 377:2023–2030 Epub 2011 Jun 1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Mogensen, T. H. , Berg R. S., Paludan S. R., and Ostergaard L.. 2008. Mechanisms of dexamethasone‐mediated inhibition of toll‐like receptor signaling induced by neisseria meningitidis and streptococcus pneumoniae. Infect. Immun. 76:189–197. doi: IAI.00856‐07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Murray, S. E. , Lallman H. R., Heard A. D., Rittenberg M. B., and Stenzel‐Poore M. P.. 2001. A genetic model of stress displays decreased lymphocytes and impaired antibody responses without altered susceptibility to streptococcus pneumoniae. J. Immunol. 167:691–698. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. O'Kane, M. , Murphy E. P., and Kirby B.. 2006. The role of corticotropin‐releasing hormone in immune‐mediated cutaneous inflammatory disease. Exp. Dermatol. 15:143–153. doi: 10.1111/j.1600‐0625.2006.00382. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Peraçoli, M. T. , Bannwart C. F., Cristofalo R., Borges V. T., Costa R. A., and Witkin S. S., et al. 2011. Increased reactive oxygen species and tumor necrosis factor‐alpha production by monocytes are associated with elevated levels of uric acid in pre‐eclamptic women. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 66:460–467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Pichichero, M. E. , and Almudevar A.. 2016. Inflammation‐associated cytokine analysis identifies presence of respiratory bacterial pathogens in the nasopharynx. Pathog. Dis. 74:1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Poulos, L. M. , Ampon R. D., Marks G. B., and Reddel H. K.. 2013. Inappropriate prescribing of inhaled corticosteroids: are they being prescribed for respiratory tract infections? A retrospective cohort study. Prim. Care Respir. J. 22:201–208. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2013.00036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Rassouli, O. , Liapakis G., Lazaridis I., Sakellaris G., Gkountelias K., Gravanis A., et al. 2011. A novel role of peripheral corticotropin‐releasing hormone (CRH) on dermal fibroblasts. PLoS ONE 6:e21654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021654. Epub 2011 Jul 13. PMID:21765902 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Refojo, D. , and Holsboer F.. 2009. CRH signaling: molecular specificity for drug targeting in the CNS. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1179:106–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Remmelts, H. H. , Meijvis S. C., Heijligenberg R., Rijkers G. T., Oosterheert J. J., Bos W. J., et al. 2012. Biomarkers define the clinical response to dexamethasone in community‐acquired pneumonia. J. Infect. 65:25–31. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2012.03.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Rodgers, G. L. , and Klugman K. P.. 2011. The future of pneumococcal disease prevention. Vaccine 29(Suppl. 3):C43–C48. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Sasayama, D. , Hori H., Iijima Y., Teraishi T., Hattori K., Ota M., et al. 2011. Modulation of cortisol responses to the DEX/CRH test by polymorphisms of the interleukin‐1beta gene in healthy adults. Behav. Brain Funct. 7:23. doi: 10.1186/1744‐9081‐7‐23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Saunders, P. R. , Santos J., Hanssen N. P., Yates D., Groot J. A., and Perdue M. H.. 2002. Physical and psychological stress in rats enhances colonic epithelial permeability via peripheral CRH. Dig. Dis. Sci. 47:208–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Schuster, K. M. , Macleod J. B., Fernandez J. B., Kumar M., and Barquist E. S.. 2012. Adrenocorticotropic hormone and cortisol response to corticotropin releasing hormone in the critically ill‐a novel assessment of the hypothalamic‐pituitary‐adrenal axis. Am. J. Surg. 203:205–210. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Silverman, E. S. , Breault D. T., Vallone J., Subramanian S., Yilmaz A. D., Mathew S., et al. 2004. Corticotropin‐releasing hormone deficiency increases allergen‐induced airway inflammation in a mouse model of asthma. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 114:747–754. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.06.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Skrupky, L. P. , Kerby P. W., and Hotchkiss R. S.. 2011. Advances in the management of sepsis and the understanding of key immunologic defects. Anesthesiology 115:1349–1362. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31823422e8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Sternberg, E. M. , and Licinio J.. 1995. Overview of neuroimmune stress interactions. Implications for susceptibility to inflammatory disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 29:364–371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Sternberg, E. M. , Chrousos G. P., Wilder R. L., and Gold P. W.. 1992. The stress response and the regulation of inflammatory disease. Ann. Intern. Med. 117:854–866. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Sutherland, T. E. , Logan N., Ruckerl D., Humbles A. A., Allan S. M., Papayannopoulos V., et al. 2014. Chitinase‐like proteins promote IL‐17‐mediated neutrophilia in a tradeoff between nematode killing and host damage. Nat. Immunol. 15:1116–1125. doi: 10.1038/ni.3023. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Vakharia, K. , and Hinson J. P.. 2005. Lipopolysaccharide directly stimulates cortisol secretion by human adrenal cells by a cyclooxygenase‐dependent mechanism. Endocrinology 146:1398–1402 Epub 2004 Nov 24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Verbanac, K. M. , Gross U. M., Rebellato L. M., and Thomas J. M.. 1993. Production of stable rabbit‐mouse heterohybridomas: characterization of a rabbit monoclonal antibody recognizing a 180 kDa human lymphocyte membrane antigen. Hybridoma 12:285–295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Vissers, M. , Ahout I. M., van den Kieboom C. H., van den Gaast‐de Jongh C. E., Groh L., Cremers A. J., et al. 2016. High pneumococcal density correlates with more mucosal inflammation and reduced respiratory syncytial virus disease severity in infants. BMC Infect. Dis. 16:129. doi: 10.1186/s12879‐016‐1454‐x. PMID: 26983753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Vlahos, R. , Wark P. A., Anderson G. P., and Bozinovski S.. 2012. Glucocorticosteroids differentially regulate MMP‐9 and neutrophil elastase in COPD. PLoS ONE 7:e33277. Epub 2012 Mar 7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Wang, W. , Zhang X., Yang L., Liu D., Liu G., and Zhou J.. 2012. Lipopolysaccharide upregulates the expression of corticotropin‐releasing hormone via MAP kinase pathway in rat peritoneal macrophages. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 361:1–7. doi: 10.1007/s11010‐011‐1080‐2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Whale, T. A. , and Griebel P. J.. 2009. A sheep in wolf's clothes: can neutrophils direct the immune response? Vet. J. 180:169–177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Wunderink, R. G. 2009. Adjunctive therapy in community‐acquired pneumonia. Semin. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 30:146–153 Epub 2009 Mar 18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao, H. , Ma J. K., Barger M. W., Mercer R. R., Millecchia L., and Schwegler‐Berry D., et al. 2009. Reactive oxygen species‐ and nitric oxide‐mediated lung inflammation and mitochondrial dysfunction in wild‐type and iNOS‐deficient mice exposed to diesel exhaust particles. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 72:560–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhu, H. , Wang J., Li J., and Li S.. 2011. Corticotropin‐releasing factor family and its receptors: pro‐inflammatory or anti‐inflammatory targets in the periphery? Inflamm. Res. 60:715–721. doi: 10.1007/s00011‐011‐0329‐2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Zizzo, G. , and Cohen P. L.. 2013. IL‐17 stimulates differentiation of human anti‐inflammatory macrophages and phagocytosis of apoptotic neutrophils in response to IL‐10 and glucocorticoids. J. Immunol. 190:5237–5246. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1203017 Epub 2013 Apr 17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Physiological Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES