Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 4;13:225–236. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.10.002

Table 4.

Electrophysiological properties of WT and mutant Cav3.2 channels.

Cav3.2WT Cav3.2196Leu Cav3.21549Ile Cav3.21951Glu Cav3.22083Leu
Activation V1/2 (mV) − 43.81 ± 1.15 (14) − 43.75 ± 1.06 (12) − 53.47 ± 0.77 (9)⁎⁎⁎ − 45.95 ± 1.33 (8) − 42.42 ± 1.86 (9)
Activation slope (k, mV) 5.89 ± 0.48 (14) 6.62 ± 0.34 (12) 6.21 ± 0.31 (9) 5.69 ± 0.19 (8) 5.99 ± 0.34 (9)
Inactivation V1/2 (mV) − 67.55 ± 1.42 (13) − 69.08 ± 1.47 (11) − 76.58 ± 0.93 (6)⁎⁎ − 67.98 ± 1.03 (6) − 73.11 ± 2.65 (6)
Inactivation slope (k, mV) 5.42 ± 0.36 (13) 5.87 ± 0.42 (11) 5.17 ± 0.22 (6) 4.19 ± 0.13 (6) 7.25 ± 0.64 (6)⁎⁎
Activation kinetics @ − 30 mV (Tau act, ms) 4.47 ± 0.33 (13) 7.99 ± 0.41 (14)⁎⁎ 8.30 ± 0.77 (9)⁎⁎ 3.57 ± 0.22 (8) 6.46 ± 0.86 (9)
Inactivation kinetics @ − 30 mV (Tau inact, ms) 21.93 ± 2.09 (11) 43.23 ± 3.14 (12)⁎⁎⁎ 83.07 ± 8.47 (7)⁎⁎⁎ 24.52 ± 2.86 (8) 24.60 ± 2.23 (7)
Recovery (Tau, ms) 509.76 ± 30.00 (8) 419.12 ± 14.49 (9) 1197.60 ± 93.92 (8)⁎⁎⁎ 349.74 ± 15.63 (7)⁎⁎⁎ 389.93 ± 28.89 (6)⁎⁎
Deactivation kinetics @ − 90 mV (Tau deact, ms) 3.01 ± 0.31 (15) 3.08 ± 0.28 (13) 11.67 ± 1.14 (9)⁎⁎⁎ 2.50 ± 0.16 (12) 3.07 ± 0.35 (9)
Facilitation (fold increase normalized current) 1.12 ± 0.05 (8) 1.34 ± 0.03 (8)⁎⁎⁎ 1.07 ± 0.02 (6) 1.26 ± 0.02 (9)⁎⁎ 1.35 ± 0.05 (9)⁎⁎⁎

Number of recorded cells are indicated in brackets.

P < 0.05 compared with WT channels.

⁎⁎

P < 0.01 compared with WT channels.

⁎⁎⁎

P < 0.001 compared with WT channels.