Abstract
Objectives
To correlate thyroid cancer genotype with histology and outcomes.
Background
The prognostic significance of molecular signature in thyroid cancer (TC) is undefined but can potentially change surgical management.
Methods
We reviewed a consecutive series of 1510 patients who had initial thyroidectomy for TC with routine testing for BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, and PAX8/PPARG alterations. Histologic metastatic or recurrent TC was tracked for 6 or more months after oncologic thyroidectomy.
Results
Papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) was diagnosed in 97% of patients and poorly differentiated/anaplastic TC in 1.1%. Genetic alterations were detected in 1039 (70%); the most common mutations were BRAFV600E (644/1039, 62%), and RAS isoforms (323/1039, 31%). BRAFV600E-positive PTC was often conventional or tall cell variant (58%), with frequent extrathyroidal extension (51%) and lymph node metastasis (46%). Conversely, RAS-positive PTC was commonly follicular variant (87%), with infrequent extrathyroidal extension (4.6%) and lymph node metastasis (5.6%). BRAFV600E and RET/PTC-positive PTCs were histologically similar. Analogously, RAS and PAX8/PPARG-positive PTCs were histologically similar. Compared with RAS or PAX8/PPARG-positive TCs, BRAFV600E or RET/PTC-positive TCs were more often associated with stage III/IV disease (40% vs 15%, P < 0.001) and recurrence (10% vs 0.7%, P < 0.001; mean follow-up 33 ± 21 mo). Distant metastasis was highest in patients with RET/PTC-positive TC (10.8%, P = 0.02).
Conclusions
In this large study of prospective mutation testing in unselected patients with TC, molecular signature was associated with distinctive phenotypes including cancers, with higher risks of both distant metastasis and early recurrence. Preoperative genotype provides valuable prognostic data to appropriately inform surgery.
Keywords: BRAF, molecular testing, RAS, thyroid, thyroid cancer
Because of the rising incidence of thyroid cancer (TC) and its unique diagnostic challenges, the costs associated with TC are escalating.1 TC is typically diagnosed during the evaluation of thyroid nodules, and fine needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) classifies thyroid nodules by cytologic characteristics into 1 of the categories defined by the 6-tiered Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology.2 Currently, up to 25% of FNAB specimens are diagnosed into 1 of the indeterminate Bethesda categories (III, IV, and V), and surgery is often required for definitive diagnosis.3,4 Molecular testing for a panel of 7 genetic markers that are associated with TC has been demonstrated to improve diagnostic specificity, to appropriately direct extent of initial thyroidectomy, and to reduce health care costs but is still considered controversial.5–7
Available staging systems to predict disease-specific outcomes such as recurrence and survival are imperfect and rely on variables that are typically available only after resection.4 Enhanced preoperative risk stratification can potentially reduce the need for reoperative surgery, which can be associated with a higher rate of operative complications. In routine preoperative use of the 7-gene panel as a diagnostic adjunct, we have previously reported that particular markers can be associated with specific histologic characteristics. BRAFV600E can be associated with central compartment lymph node metastasis (CLNM) and other aggressive features.8,9 Preoperative detection of RAS was associated with an 83% risk of histologic malignancy and particularly with follicular variant papillary thyroid cancer (FV-PTC, 88%).10,11 FV-PTC is also commonly associated with preoperative detection of the PAX8/PPARG rearrangement.12 Whether disease outcomes are associated with the specific mutation results from the 7-gene panel has not yet been comprehensively evaluated. The study objective was to correlate TC genotype to histology and to disease-related outcomes including recurrence and survival.
METHODS
Patients
After Quality Initiative/Quality Assurance institutional review board approval, we conducted a single institution retrospective study of the perioperative data retrieved from the systemwide electronic medical record for all consecutive patients who received thyroidectomy for histologic papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) from February 1, 2007 to July 1, 2013 (QIIRB #1057). Preoperative cervical ultrasound with lymph node mapping and ultrasound-guided FNAB were routinely performed for thyroid nodules per the American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines.4,13 Thyroidectomy was performed algorithmically for clinical, radiographical, cytological, and molecular results as previously described.6 Extent of lymphadenectomy was determined by assessment of malignancy potential on preoperative ultrasonography and by intraoperative findings. Lateral compartment (levels 2–5) lymph nodes with suspicious ultrasound features including rounded appearance, cystic changes, loss of fatty hilum, and/or microcalcifications were biopsied preoperatively. If the results were positive for metastatic disease, selective compartment-oriented lymph node dissection was performed. Postoperative radioactive iodine ablation and degree of thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) suppression were determined by clinical and histologic results per the ATA guidelines.4,13 Frequency and modality of surveillance including serum thyroglobulin and thyroglobulin antibody levels, cervical ultrasonography, and whole body I-131 imaging were directed by clinician’s concern for recurrence and guideline recommendations.4,13
Protocol for Prospective Molecular Testing
Molecular testing for a panel of markers that included BRAFV600E, BRAFK601E, NRAS codon61, HRAS codon61, KRAS codons12, and 13-point mutations, RET/PTC1, RET/PTC3, and PAX8/PPARG rearrangements was prospectively performed in all study patients for the following indications: (1) preoperatively for all in-house FNAB results that were positive for malignancy or in the indeterminate Bethesda cytology categories of atypia of undetermined significance/follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS/FLUS, III), follicular neoplasm (FN, IV), and suspicious for malignancy (V); (2) preoperatively by request for selected nodules with either benign or nondiagnostic cytology results; and (3) postoperatively in all histologic malignancies larger than 3 mm in size in the absence of previous molecular testing of FNAB cytology. In patients who had multifocal TC and mutation testing of more than 1 lesion, only the focus with more aggressive histologic features such as larger size or presence of extrathyroidal extension was included in further analysis.
Disease Outcomes
Pathologic confirmation of regional or distant metastatic disease after either reoperation or FNAB was classified as persistent (<6 months after initial surgery) or recurrent (≥6 months after initial surgery) disease.
Data Analysis
χ2 was used to examine associations between categorical variables and unpaired 2-tailed Student t test was used to identify correlation between continuous variables. Kaplan-Meier and logistic regression analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA).
RESULTS
A total of 1510 patients with TC were examined. Women comprised the majority of the cohort (77%) and mean age at surgery was 49.2 ± 15.8 years. Histologic PTC was diagnosed in 97% of patients. Poorly differentiated and anaplastic TCs were present in only 0.5% and 0.6% of patients, respectively. Five patients (0.3%) had medullary TC that was nonhereditary in each case. Multifocal disease or extrathyroidal extension was present in 51% and 30% of patients, respectively. The majority (66%, 1003 patients) had at least 1 central compartment lymph node histologically evaluated (mean number of central compartment lymph nodes evaluated, 5.4 ± 5.1), and 40% of the 1003 patients had CLNM. Lateral compartment lymph node metastasis (LLNM) was identified preoperatively in 138 patients (9%), and selective lateral neck dissection was performed concurrently with initial thyroidectomy in all 138 patients (Table 1).
TABLE 1.
Patient and Thyroid Cancer Characteristics (n = 1510)
| Men | 343 (23%) |
| Mean age, yr | 49.2 ± 15.8 |
| Mean tumor size, cm | 2.1 ± 1.6 |
| Type of thyroid cancer | |
| Papillary | 1468 (97%) |
| Follicular | 10 (0.7%) |
| Oncocytic (Hurthle) cell | 10 (0.7%) |
| Poorly differentiated | 8 (0.5%) |
| Anaplastic | 9 (0.6%) |
| Medullary | 5 (0.3%) |
| Multifocal | 775 (51%) |
| Extrathyroidal extension | 453 (30%) |
| CLN evaluated | 1003 |
| Mean no. of CLN evaluated | 5.4 ± 5.1 |
| No. with CLNM | 405 (40%) |
| LLNM | 138 (9%) |
| Mutation positive | 1039 (69%) |
| Mean follow-up, mo | 33 ± 21.2 |
| No. with >6-mo follow-up | 1349 (89%) |
| Recurrence | 78 (5.8%) |
CLN indicates central lymph nodes.
Molecular testing using the 7-gene panel identified an alteration in 69% of patients (n = 1039) and no tumor had more than 1 mutation. TC positive for BRAFV600E was identified in 42.6% (644) of patients (Fig. 1). Other BRAF variants were identified including K601E in 12 patients (0.9%) and a codon 582–598 duplication in 1 patient. After BRAFV600E, RAS mutations were the next most common genetic alteration and included mutations in NRAS 61 (225 patients, 14.9%), HRAS 61 (89 patients, 5.9%), and KRAS 12/13 (9 patients, 0.9%). Rearrangements were less frequently identified and the incidence of RET/PTC1, PAX8/PPARG, and RET/PTC3 was 1.9% (29), 1.1% (16), and 0.5% (8), respectively (Fig. 1).
FIGURE 1.
Distribution of molecular testing results.
TCs associated with BRAFV600E, RET/PTC, and PAX8/PPARG were almost all PTCs. The exceptions were 3 BRAFV600Epositive TCs that were anaplastic TCs. Although 97% of TCs associated with RAS mutations were also PTC, RAS was associated with other histologies including follicular TC and oncocytic (Hurthle) cell cancer (Table 2). Of the 5 RAS-positive poorly differentiated/anaplastic TCs, mutations in NRAS 61 were identified in 4 patients and mutations in HRAS 61 in 1 patient. Two patients had sporadic medullary TCs that were associated with HRAS 61 and KRAS 12/13 mutations.
TABLE 2.
Thyroid Cancer Distribution by Mutation
| BRAF V600E | RAS | RET/PTC | PAX8-PPARG | BRAFK601E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Papillary TC | 641 (99.5%) | 312 (97%) | 37 (100%) | 16 (100%) | 12 (100%) |
| Conventional | 250 (39%) | 9 (3%) | 20 (54%) | — | — |
| Follicular variant | 78 (12%) | 270 (87%) | 1 (2.7%) | 15 (94%) | 11 (92%) |
| Tall cell variant | 123 (19%) | 2 (0.6%) | 2 (5.4%) | — | |
| Other | 15 (2.3%) | 5 (1.6%) | 2 (5.4%) | — | |
| Not specified | 174 (27%) | 26 (8%) | 13 (35%) | 1 (6%) | 1 (8%) |
| Follicular TC | — | 3 (0.9%) | — | — | — |
| Hurthle cell TC | — | 1 (0.3%) | — | — | — |
| Poorly differentiated and anaplastic TC | 3 (0.5%) | 5 (1.5%) | — | — | — |
| Medullary TC | — | 2 (0.6%) | — | — | — |
Specific mutations were also associated with PTC subtypes (Table 2). PTCs that were positive for BRAFV600E and RET/PTC were often conventional (39% and 54%) or tall cell variant (19% and 5.4%). On the contrary, RAS-, PAX8/PPARG-, and BRAFK601Epositive PTCs were frequently follicular variant (87%, 94%, and 92%, respectively). There were no significant associations between mutation and mean tumor size or multifocality (Table 3).
TABLE 3.
Histologic Characteristics by Mutation
| BRAF V600E | RAS | RET/PTC | PAX8-PPARγ | BRAFK601E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean tumor size, cm | 1.7 ± 1.2 | 2.3 ± 1.6 | 2 ± 1.5 | 3.2 ± 1.6 | 2.4 ± 3.1 |
| Multifocal | 360 (56%) | 153 (47%) | 23 (63%) | 7 (44%) | 9 (75%) |
| Extrathyroidal extension | 327 (51%) | 15 (4.6%) | 18 (49%) | 0 | 0 |
| No. with CLND | 523 (81%) | 156 (48%) | 33 (89%) | 8 (50%) | 7 (58%) |
| CLNM | 286 (55%) | 16 (10%) | 23 (70%) | 0 | 0 |
| LLNM | 92 (14%) | 4 (1.2%) | 13 (35%) | 0 | 0 |
| Distant metastasis at presentation | 13 (2%) | 7 (2%) | 3 (8%) | 0 | 0 |
| TNM stage | |||||
| 1 | 56% | 67% | 57% | 69% | 100% |
| 2 | 4% | 15% | 8% | 13% | 0% |
| 3 | 32% | 13% | 22% | 19% | 0% |
| 4 | 9% | 3% | 14% | 0% | 0% |
CLND indicates Central compartment lymph node dissection.
Similar histologic features were observed between BRAFV600E- and RET/PTC-positive PTC including the likelihood of extrathyroidal extension (51% vs 49%, P = 0.9) and CLNM (55% vs 70%, P = 0.13). However, LLNM was more likely in RET/PTC than in BRAFV600E-positive PTC (35% vs 14%, P = 0.001). Distant metastasis at presentation was also diagnosed in 3 of 37 (8%) patients with RET/PTC-positive PTC compared with 13 of 644 (2%) patients with BRAFV600E-positive PTC (P = 0.05). Similar, less aggressive histologic features were observed for RAS-, PAX8/PPARG-, and BRAFK601E-positive PTCs that had equivalently low rates of extrathyroidal extension (4.6% vs 0% vs 0%, P = 0.5) and CLNM (10% vs 0% vs 0%, P = 0.6). LLNM was present in 4 patients with RAS-positive TCs and all 4 were NRAS 61 positive. Distant metastasis at presentation did not differ significantly between patients with RAS-positive tumors (7/323, 2%), or with PAX8/PPARG and BRAFK601E-positive tumors (0%, P = 1). Advanced American Joint Committee on Cancer Tumor (AJCC) stage III or IV disease at presentation was as frequent with BRAFV600E-positive TC as with RET/PTC-positive TC (41% vs 35%, P = 0.11) and was also as frequent with RAS-, PAX8/PPARG-, and BRAFK601E-positive TCs (17% vs 19% vs 0%, P = 0.3). Thus, BRAFV600E- and RET/PTC-positive PTCs were phenotypically similar and RAS-, PAX8/PPARG-, and BRAF K601E–positive PTCs were phenotypically analogous.
Persistent disease requiring neck reoperation for less than 6 months after initial surgery occurred in 12 patients—4 patients with RET/PTC mutations who had lateral neck dissection (n = 2) and reoperative central compartment neck dissection (n = 2) and 8 patients with BRAF mutations who had mediastinal exploration (n = 2), lateral neck dissection (n = 5), or both reoperative central and lateral neck dissection (n = 1). Metachronous metastatic disease occurred in 6 patients; 4 with BRAFV600E PTC, 1 with RET/PTC PTC, and 1 with NRAS 61 positive PTC. Compared with RAS-, PAX8/PPARG-, or BRAFK601E-positive TC, the TCs expressing BRAFV600E or RET/PTC were more often associated with AJCC stage III/IV at presentation (40% vs 15%, P < 0.001) and early recurrence (10% vs 0.7%, P < 0.001; mean follow-up 33 ± 21 mo). Distant metastasis was highest in patients with RET/PTC-positive TC (10.8%, P = 0.02).
Mean follow-up for the entire cohort was 33 ± 21.2 months. More than 6-month follow-up was available for 89% (1349) of patients, and overall 79 patients (5.8%) required reoperation for recurrent disease (Table 4). Among the 1039 patients who had positive 7-gene mutation testing results, recurrences were most common in patients with BRAFV600E- (9.7%) or RET/PTC-(9.4%) positive TC. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, type of mutation helped stratify disease-free survival (DFS) (Fig. 2). DFS at 5 years for patients with RAS-, PAX8/PPARG-, and BRAFK601E-positive TCs (96%, 100%, and 100%, respectively) was higher than that for patients with BRAFV600E- and RET/PTC-positive TCs (80% and 77%; P < 0.001).
TABLE 4.
Disease Outcomes by Mutation
| BRAF V600E | RAS | RET/PTC | PAX8-PPARG | BRAFK601E | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean follow-up, mo | 33 ± 20.6 | 31 ± 21.7 | 27 ± 19.8 | 30 ± 18.4 | 20.5 ± 15.3 |
| Persistence | 16 (2.6%) | 7 (2.3%) | 5 (15.6%) | 0 | 0 |
| Recurrence | 57 (9.7%) | 2 (0.7%) | 3 (9.4%) | 0 | 0 |
| Deceased | 16 (2.5%) | 7 (2.2%) | 1 (2.7%) | 1 (6.3%) | 0 |
FIGURE 2.
Disease-free survival differs according to mutation by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Overall disease-specific survival at 5 years was 99.7% and was not dependent on mutation (P = 0.9).
DISCUSSION
Many of the genetic changes that lead to thyroid carcinogenesis have been recently elucidated and involve alterations in the MAPK and PI3K pathways such as mutations in BRAF and RAS.14,15 Using accurate and cost-effective techniques, the alterations can be readily detected in preoperative FNAB and pathology specimens. In 2007, we initiated a prospective clinical management algorithm that implemented routine molecular testing for a 7-gene panel of all FNAB specimens that were either cytologically indeterminate or from nodules with other clinically concerning characteristics such as large size. We also tested histologic PTC tumors larger than 3 mm that did not have testing performed preoperatively using the same 7-gene panel.5 In this consecutive, unselected, and large series of histologic TCs with long-term follow-up, we demonstrate here that TC genotype correlates to tumor phenotype including histologic features and DFS.
We have previously shown that molecular testing of FNAB specimens classified into 1 of the 3 indeterminate Bethesda categories can be used to accurately diagnose TC preoperatively. In the study by Nikiforov et al,5 513 FNAB indeterminate specimens with cytology, molecular results from the 7-gene panel, and histology were analyzed. When any one of the mutations was identified, the risk of cancer was 87% to 95%, depending on the cytology category. Because of the high risk of malignancy, a positive molecular testing result was an indication for initial total thyroidectomy, which is the recommended surgical procedure for patients with a known diagnosis of TC.4 In contrast, when no mutation was identified, the risk of cancer was reduced in the AUS/FLUS, FN, and suspicious categories to 6%, 14%, and 28%, respectively, and thus, initial lobectomy was recommended.5 The high performance of a similar molecular panel was also validated by Cantara et al.16 In a subsequent cohort study, we observed that a clinical algorithm that used molecular testing results to guide extent of thyroidectomy led to a 30% increase in appropriate total thyroidectomy for a clinically significant TC while also resulting in a 33% increase in lobectomy alone for either papillary thyroid microcarcinoma or benign histology.6
Other studies have shown that molecular testing for either single gene mutations such as BRAFV600E or the 7-gene panel as an adjunct to FNA biopsy adds diagnostic accuracy.17,18 But whether molecular testing provides additional information on tumor characteristics and prognosis is lesswell defined. BRAFV600E is the most common mutation identified in PTC and may be predictive of aggressive clinical features.19,20 However, in other studies, its presence does not always seem to be associated with aggressive histologic features.21,22 Retrospective selection of tumors that undergo mutation testing and geographic variation in the prevalence of TC subtypes may have contributed to the differential results observed. When compared with a consecutive series of histologic TCs in the present study, we observed a distinctive tumor phenotype that was associated with BRAFV600E. Almost all (99.5%) were PTCs and the majority were conventional or tall cell variant. BRAFV600E-positive PTC had a high incidence of extrathyroidal extension (51%), CLNM (55%), and 41% of patients presented with advanced AJCCTNM stage III/IV. We and others have previously shown that BRAFV600E-positive FNAB was often associated with cytologic findings that have either architectural or cellular atypia.21,23 However, in the study by Ohori et al,23 approximately 20% of BRAFV600E-positive FNA biopsy specimens were classified as being in the indeterminate category including AUS/FLUS, FN, or suspicious, and in these patients, preoperative BRAF testing helped avoid unnecessary repeat biopsy when indicated, facilitated preoperative patient counseling, and led to appropriate initial total thyroidectomy. Now with nearly 3 years of follow-up, we observed a DFS of 80% at 5 years that seems to plateau thereafter. With longer follow-up, we anticipate that we will be able to further determine optimal surveillance strategies for these patients using both comprehensive mutation status and histologic features to guide risk stratification.
In this study, TCs that were positive for BRAFV600E were phenotypically similar to those that were positive for RET/PTC. Conventional and tall cell PTCs that were the most common histologic subtypes for both mutations and aggressive histologic features were seen at equivalent rates in patients with BRAFV600E- and RET/PTC-positive PTCs. However, patients with RET/PTC-positive PTC had a high incidence of LLNM (35%) and distant metastasis (8%) at presentation.
Equally notable is that nearly 25% of the histologic TCs diagnosed here were positive for RAS, PAX8/PPARG, and BRAFK601E, and these tumors had a high likelihood of having encapsulated histologic features. RAS-positive FV-PTC can rarely also be infiltrative or be associated with multiple areas of capsular or vascular invasion, and careful histologic examination is essential to accurately discriminate these more worrisome lesions from the well-demarcated, encapsulated FV-PTC.10 For all patients with RAS-, PAX8/PPARG-, and BRAFK601E-positive TCs, the clinical course was indolent and DFS was nearly 100% at 5 years. We believe that deescalated care, including initial lobectomy instead of total thyroidectomy and limiting the use of radioactive iodine may be indicated for the majority of patients with TC associated with RAS, PAX8/PPARG, and BRAFK601E mutations.
Further classification of PTC using molecular signature was also proposed in analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data.24 Comprehensive whole genome sequencing that included miRNA, DNA methylation, and protein expression was performed for 496 submitted PTCs, and distinctive molecular features were observed that clustered into BRAF-like and RAS-like tumors. BRAF-like PTCs were genetically and phenotypically more heterogeneous but included the subset of tumors that were most likely to present at advanced stage and recur. The phenotype of the RAS-like PTC in TCGA was also similar to what we observed and was more likely to be FVPTC and have a low recurrence risk.24 However, our series here also included non-PTC tumor types and we observed that 5/8 (40%) of the poorly differentiated/anaplastic TCs and 2 medullary thyroid cancers (MTC) had RAS mutations. Thus, we conclude that RAS-positive PTC may have a predictable phenotype, but preoperative detection of RAS should also take into account the possibility for the rarer, yet aggressive non-PTC malignancies.
Although approximately 9% of BRAFV600E and RET/PTC-positive TCs had recurrent disease, the majority were disease-free at last follow-up. In multivariable analysis, the presence of BRAFV600E when all other histologic features are known was not an independent predictor of disease-related mortality, which limits its incorporation into commonly used staging systems such the AJCC system.20 On the contrary, BRAFV600E has been associated with an increased risk of recurrence, and we have previously observed that the risk was highest in patients who were 65 years of age or older.8,19 The presence of extrathyroidal extension and lymph node metastasis is also predictive of recurrent disease, and the association of these histologic features to recurrence may be augmented in BRAFV600E-positive PTC.19 However, histologic features cannot feasibly be used to guide initial surgical management. Additional genetic markers have already been identified that provide additional risk stratification and these include TERT promoter, p53, and PIK3CA mutations. TERT promoter mutations (C228T and C250T) are found in association with BRAFV600E or RAS mutations, are seen in PTC with aggressive clinicopathologic features, and are independently associated with disease-specific mortality.25,26 In addition to the presence of one of the mutations known to be associated with aggressive disease, the detection of more than 1 mutation can also be a marker of poorer prognosis. Multigene sequencing analysis such as next generation sequencing allows sensitive high-throughput evaluation of a broader panel of markers on FNA cytology that can further refine preoperative prognostication.27
Knowing this correlation between tumor genotype and disease phenotype can now potentially help tailor cost-effective preoperative evaluation and further guide extent of initial surgery. When BRAFV600E or RET/PTC is detected preoperatively, cervical ultrasonography with lymph node mapping of the lateral and central compartments should always be performed (Fig. 3). If no obvious disease is seen, prophylactic central compartment lymph node dissection by experienced surgeons at the time of initial total thyroidectomy may be considered because of the 56% incidence of CLNM reported here. Although not studied in an RET/PTC-specific cohort, aggressive surgical resection of occult lymph node metastasis in the lateral neck using either prophylactic lateral neck dissection or sentinel lymph node mapping has not to date resulted in improvements in rate of recurrence or survival and thus is not currently recommended as standard of care.4 Preoperative imaging of the chest to evaluate for metastatic disease should also be considered for patients with RET/PTC-positive TC, in particular, and patients should also be counseled on the 10% to 15% risk of recurrent disease at 5 years. On the contrary, when RAS, PAX8/PPARG, or BRAFK601E is detected preoperatively, the likelihood of FV-PTC is high and in the absence of concerning ultrasound features, lobectomy alone may be sufficient treatment for selected low-risk lesions. RAS-positive lesions may be either poorly differentiated/anaplastic or MTC, and clinical and radiographical features may be helpful in differentiating these aggressive TCs from the more indolent encapsulated FV-PTC.
FIGURE 3.
Phenotypic characteristics of associated thyroid cancer by mutation. DM indicates distant metastasis; ETT, extrathyroidal extension; MTC, medullary thyroid cancer.
Limitations of the present study include use of electronic medical record review without rereview of histology or cytology results. Second, treating physicians were not blinded to mutation testing results, which may have influenced decision making such as extent of surgery, need for radioactive iodine ablation, and intensity of surveillance. Thus, it was not possible to objectively evaluate whether genotype altered our threshold for postoperative treatment. Third, multifocal disease was identified in 51% of patients, and only the tumor with the most aggressive histologic features was included in the study, which may have led to some degree of bias. Finally, in analysis, we did not include the cohort that was 7-gene mutation panel negative as likely these tumors carry a genetic alteration that overlaps with the MAPK and PI3K pathways. The Cancer Genome Atlas analysis demonstrated that after whole genome sequencing, only 3.5% of the analyzed PTC failed to have an apparent driver mutation.24 Our current molecular panel has already expanded to include additional genetic mutations such as PTEN and EIF1AX and rearrangements such as NTRK fusions that will help further stratify the 31% of patients with “mutation-negative” TC. The expanded multigene panel has higher diagnostic sensitivity, and in a recent study of FNA biopsies classified as follicular neoplasm, a mutation-negative result was associated with only a 4% risk of TC, and active surveillance may be a very reasonable consideration.28
CONCLUSIONS
In this consecutive series of 1510 patients with TC who had mutation testing for a 7-gene panel, 69% had a mutation in BRAF V600E, BRAF K601E, NRAS codon 61, HRAS codon 61, KRAS codons 12/13 point mutations, RET/PTC1, RET/PTC3, or PAX8/PPARG rearrangements. Outcomes varied by mutation: BRAFV600E and RET/PTC-positive TCs tended to be more aggressive with 5-year DFS of 84% and 78%, respectively. But RAS-, PAX8/PPARG-, and BRAFK601E-positive TCs were indolent with 5-year DFS of more than 97%, and this phenotype can be equally informative at guiding patient care. Thus, tumor genotype was associated with histologic and clinical phenotype, and molecular signature should be a component of the preoperative and postoperative risk stratification of patients with TC.
Acknowledgments
Supported by UPMC CMSO funding, NIH R03-AG042334, and 1P50 CA097190. Dr Yuri E. Nikiforov is a consultant for Quest Diagnostics.
Footnotes
Presented at the 135th Annual Meeting of the American Surgical Association, April 23–25,2015, San Diego, CA.
Disclosure: The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Sosa JA, Hanna JW, Robinson KA, et al. Increases in thyroid nodule fine-needle aspirations, operations, and diagnoses of thyroid cancer in the United States. Surgery. 2013;154:1420–1426. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2013.07.006. discussion 1426–1427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Baloch ZW, LiVolsi VA, Asa SL, et al. Diagnostic terminology and morphologic criteria for cytologic diagnosis of thyroid lesions: a synopsis of the National Cancer Institute Thyroid Fine-Needle Aspiration State of the Science Conference. Diagn Cytopathol. 2008;36:425–437. doi: 10.1002/dc.20830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bongiovanni M, Spitale A, Faquin WC, et al. The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology: a meta-analysis. Acta Cytol. 2012;56:333–339. doi: 10.1159/000339959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.American Thyroid Association Guidelines Taskforce on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated. Thyroid C, Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al., editors. Revised American Thyroid Association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009;19:1167–1214. doi: 10.1089/thy.2009.0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nikiforov YE, Ohori NP, Hodak SP, et al. Impact of mutational testing on the diagnosis and management of patients with cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules: a prospective analysis of 1056 FNA samples. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:3390–3397. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-1469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yip L. Use of molecular markers for cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules to optimize surgical management. Curr Surg Rep. 2014;2:35. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yip L, Farris C, Kabaker AS, et al. Cost impact of molecular testing for indeterminate thyroid nodule fine-needle aspiration biopsies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:1905–1912. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Howell GM, Carty SE, Armstrong MJ, et al. Both BRAF V600E mutation and older age (≥65 years) are associated with recurrent papillary thyroid cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:3566–3571. doi: 10.1245/s10434-011-1781-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Yip L, Nikiforova MN, Carty SE, et al. Optimizing surgical treatment of papillary thyroid carcinoma associated with BRAF mutation. Surgery. 2009;146:1215–1223. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gupta N, Dasyam AK, Carty SE, et al. RAS mutations in thyroid FNA specimens are highly predictive of predominantly low-risk follicular-pattern cancers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:E914–E922. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-3396. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Radkay LA, Chiosea SI, Seethala RR, et al. Thyroid nodules with KRAS mutations are different from nodules with NRAS and HRAS mutations with regard to cytopathologic and histopathologic outcome characteristics. Cancer Cytopathol. 2014;122:873–882. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Armstrong MJ, Huaitao Y, Yip L, et al. PAX8/PPARgamma rearrangement in thyroid nodules predicts follicular-pattern carcinomas, in particular the encapsulated follicular variant of papillary carcinoma. Thyroid. 2014;24:1369–1374. doi: 10.1089/thy.2014.0067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, et al. Management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2006;16:109–142. doi: 10.1089/thy.2006.16.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Nikiforov YE, Yip L, Nikiforova MN. New strategies in diagnosing cancer in thyroid nodules: impact of molecular markers. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19:2283–2288. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1253. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Xing M, Haugen BR, Schlumberger M. Progress in molecular-based management of differentiated thyroid cancer. Lancet. 2013;381:1058–1069. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60109-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cantara S, Capezzone M, Marchisotta S, et al. Impact of proto-oncogene mutation detection in cytological specimens from thyroid nodules improves the diagnostic accuracy of cytology. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:1365–1369. doi: 10.1210/jc.2009-2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lee ST, Kim SW, Ki CS, et al. Clinical implication of highly sensitive detection of the BRAF V600E mutation in fine-needle aspirations of thyroid nodules: a comparative analysis of three molecular assays in 4585 consecutive cases in a BRAF V600E mutation-prevalent area. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:2299–2306. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-3135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Canadas-Garre M, Becerra-Massare P, Lopez de la Torre-Casares M, et al. Reduction of false-negative papillary thyroid carcinomas by the routine analysis of BRAF (T1799A) mutation on fine-needle aspiration biopsy specimens: a prospective study of 814 thyroid FNAB patients. Ann Surg. 2012;255:986–992. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824e8d70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xing M, Alzahrani AS, Carson KA, et al. Association between BRAF V600E mutation and recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:42–50. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.8253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Xing M, Alzahrani AS, Carson KA, et al. Association between BRAF V600E mutation and mortality in patients with papillary thyroid cancer. JAMA. 2013;309:1493–1501. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.3190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kleiman DA, Sporn MJ, Beninato T, et al. Preoperative BRAF (V600E) mutation screening is unlikely to alter initial surgical treatment of patients with indeterminate thyroid nodules: a prospective case series of 960 patients. Cancer. 2013;119:1495–1502. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lee KC, Li C, Schneider EB, et al. Is BRAF mutation associated with lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid cancer? Surgery. 2012;152:977–983. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ohori NP, Singhal R, Nikiforova MN, et al. BRAF mutation detection in indeterminate thyroid cytology specimens: underlying cytologic, molecular, and pathologic characteristics of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:197–205. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Integrated genomic characterization of papillary thyroid carcinoma. Cell. 2014;159:676–690. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Liu X, Bishop J, Shan Y, et al. Highly prevalent TERT promoter mutations in aggressive thyroid cancers. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2013;20:603–610. doi: 10.1530/ERC-13-0210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Melo M, da Rocha AG, Vinagre J, et al. TERT promoter mutations are a major indicator of poor outcome in differentiated thyroid carcinomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99:E754–E765. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-3734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Nikiforova MN, Wald AI, Roy S, et al. Targeted next-generation sequencing panel (ThyroSeq) for detection of mutations in thyroid cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98:E1852–E1860. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Nikiforov YE, Carty SE, Chiosea SI, et al. Highly accurate diagnosis of cancer in thyroid nodules with follicular neoplasm/suspicious for a follicular neoplasm cytology by ThyroSeq v2 next-generation sequencing assay. Cancer. 2014;120:3627–3634. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



