Skip to main content
Medicine logoLink to Medicine
. 2016 Dec 9;95(49):e5663. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005663

Comparison of image quality from filtered back projection, statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms in abdominal computed tomography: Erratum

PMCID: PMC5266075  PMID: 31265669

In the article “Comparison of image quality from filtered back projection, statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms in abdominal computed tomography”,[1] which appeared in Volume 95, Issue 31 of Medicine, funding information was originally omitted. The funding statement should read as follows: This study was supported by grants from the Center of Excellence for Cancer Research at Taipei Veterans General Hospital (MOHW104-TDU-B-211-124-001), Taiwan, from Taipei Veterans General Hospital (V105C-029), Taipei, Taiwan.

Reference

  • [1].Kuo Y, Lin Y-Y, Lee R-C, et al. Comparison of image quality from filtered back projection, statistical iterative reconstruction, and model-based iterative reconstruction algorithms in abdominal computed tomography. Medicine. 2016. 95:e4456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Medicine are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES