Abstract
Objectives:
To assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice of parents regarding antibiotic usage for treating upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) among children.
Methods:
A cross-sectional study was conducted among 320 randomly selected parents attending a primary health clinic using self-administered questionnaires.
Results:
About two-thirds (69.1%) of the parents had poor knowledge level. Only 25.2% and 21.6% of the parents could correctly identify amoxicillin and penicillin as the treatment of children’s URTI. However, about two-thirds (67.5%) of the parents were aware of the antibiotic resistance caused by overuse of antibiotics. A significant association was noted between the father’s and mother’s educational level and family income with the knowledge level. Only mother’s educational level depicted a significant association with the attitude.
Conclusion:
The knowledge of parents regarding antibiotic usage for URTI was poor. More numbers of health promotions and educational campaigns are required to help parents understand about antibiotic usage.
Keywords: parental knowledge, attitude and practice, antibiotic usage, children’s upper respiratory tract infection, primary health care, Malaysia
Introduction
According to the Malaysian National Medicine Use Survey (NMUS) 2007,1 antibiotics ranked in the first place for a medication item on which the highest amount was spent in 2006 and 2007 consecutively. In addition, antibiotic is the 11th most frequently used medication in Malaysia, with penicillin at the top of the list.
Across the world, the emergence of bacterial strains resistant to antimicrobial agents is becoming more and more severe with time.2 Antibiotic resistance is highly associated with the rampant use of antibiotics.3 In primary care clinics, children usually present with respiratory symptoms such as sore throat, which is suggestive of acute tonsillitis or acute pharyngitis, acute otitis media, acute sinusitis, common cold, and acute bronchitis. These common infections in children are mostly viral and self-limiting, for which antibiotics are most often not necessary. However, globally, more than 50% of children with upper respiratory tract infection (URTI) continue to be treated with antibiotics, receiving an average of 2 to 3 prescriptions per year.4
Antibiotic abuse in URTIs in children is the most common factor leading to antibiotic resistance; thus, the judicious use of antibiotics among children is extremely crucial.5 Antibiotic resistance in children is increasingly becoming a major public health problem globally. If this continues, antibiotic, which was once the most effective and inexpensive treatment for URTIs, will slowly become less effective or may even cause increased rate of morbidity and mortality among children.6
Several local studies conducted in Malaysia have reported that URTI was the most common infections for which antibiotics was prescribed in hospitals; it was as high as 31% and 50% to 55.2% in a primary care setting.7,8 Inappropriate prescription of antibiotics from doctors and poor patients’ knowledge regarding antibiotic usage and complication has led to an increase in the misuse of antibiotics.9 Bella et al10 reported that only 21.4% of the survey respondents could understand antibiotic usage instructions on the labels, which suggests that the parents’ knowledge was far too inadequate. Thus, this global issue needs much greater attention.
The aim of this study was to assess the knowledge, attitude, and practice among parents regarding antibiotic usage for treating URTIs in children at a primary health-care clinic as well as to provide further insight into planning intervention programs to combat antibiotic misuse issues.
Materials and Methods
A cross-sectional study was conducted at the Bandar Tasik Selatan Clinic located in the Bandar Tasik Selatan, Kuala Lumpur, on 320 parents between April and July 2015. This clinic is a primary health clinic under the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Medical Center (UKMMC), and the respondents were selected from among parents attending that clinic by a simple random sampling method.
The participants were self-administered with questionnaires consisting of 4 parts with a total of 33 questions: The first part highlighted participant’s sociodemographic status such as their gender, race, educational level, working status, and family monthly income. The other sections comprised questions about the knowledge including the source of knowledge and parental knowledge about the antibiotic. The parent is asked to mark the antibiotic that they know and also the indication of antibiotic usage. Third part is about the parents’ attitudes toward the antibiotic usage in URTI. We ask the parent about the symptoms and time they see the doctor for the treatment. We also ask the frequency of antibiotic usage by the parent for treating their children, and, finally, about parents’ practice regarding the antibiotic usage. One of the questions we asked is about whether the parents are well informed about the antibiotic usage by the doctor. These questionnaires were adopted from those used by Rousounidis et al with some modification. The questions were translated into Malay language, and a pilot study was conducted to ensure its clarity for the participants. A pretest was conducted to validate the questionnaires, with a Cronbach α of .626 for knowledge and .769 for attitude. Written-informed consent was obtained from the respondents prior to the study.
The section on knowledge consisted of 7 questions (total score = 7); a score of >4 was considered as good knowledge. Regarding the section on attitude, it consisted of 14 questions (total score = 70); a score of >35 was considered as good attitude, which referred to the parent’s will to follow doctor’s advice and prescription in the future to treat URTI in their children.
The collected data were analyzed using SPSS (version 20.0). Data analysis was based on bivariate analysis and descriptive analysis. Descriptive analyses were applied by calculating the median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables such as age and family income, while percentages and frequencies were applied for categorical variables. The statistical tests performed included chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-Wallis test. P ≤ .05 was considered statistically significant in 2-tailed tests. This study was approved by the Research and Ethics Committee of UKMMC.
Results
A total of 320 respondents participated in the study. The respondents represented different sociodemographic backgrounds (Table 1). The majority of the respondents were Malay (85.9%), followed by Chinese (10.3%), and Indian (3.8%). Most of the respondents were mothers (74.1%). Almost all fathers (99.7%) and mothers (98.5%) had completed at least secondary school education. Moreover, more than half (60%) of the respondents were government servants. The median age of respondents was 32 years, with an IQR of 7 years, while the median for monthly family income was RM 4125.00 (IQR = RM 3000.00).
Table 1.
Sociodemographic Characteristics of the Respondents.
| Sociodemographic | Frequency | % |
|---|---|---|
| Gender of respondents | ||
| Male | 83 | 25.9 |
| Female | 237 | 74.1 |
| Race | ||
| Malay | 275 | 85.9 |
| Chinese | 33 | 10.3 |
| Indian | 12 | 3.8 |
| Father’s education | ||
| Primary school | 1 | 0.3 |
| Secondary school | 119 | 37.2 |
| Preuniversity | 37 | 11.6 |
| University | 163 | 50.9 |
| Mother’s education | ||
| Primary school | 5 | 1.5 |
| Secondary school | 110 | 34.4 |
| Preuniversity | 62 | 19.4 |
| University | 143 | 44.7 |
| Occupation | ||
| Private | 69 | 21.6 |
| Government | 192 | 60.0 |
| Not working | 59 | 18.4 |
| Median | Interquartile range (IQR) | |
| Age of respondents, years | 32 | 7 |
| Monthly family income, RM | 4125.00 | 3000.00 |
Parental Knowledge
Doctors (46.1%) were found to be the main source of information regarding antibiotic usage, followed by Internet (17.5%) and friend (9.6%). Only 25.2% and 21.6% of the parents could correctly identify amoxicillin and penicillin as the most commonly used antibiotics in children’s URTI, respectively. Interestingly, many (67.5%) respondents believed that inappropriate usage of antibiotics reduces their efficacy and encourages bacterial resistant, and the majority of the respondents (41.3%) believed that usage of antibiotics has side effects.
The assessment revealed that approximately two-thirds (69.1%) of the respondents had a poor level of knowledge. Table 2 shows the association between respondents’ sociodemographic characteristics and knowledge level. A significant association was noted between the knowledge level with the father’s educational level (Prevalence Odds Ratio [POR] = 2.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.620-4.800, P < .001), mother’s educational level (POR = 2.36, 95%CI 1.376-4.035, P = .002), and family income (P = .002). Poor knowledge level was detected in low-income family as well as for parents with low educational level.
Table 2.
Association of Sociodemographics and Knowledge Level.
| Knowledge | P Value | POR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poor, n (%) | Good, n (%) | ||||
| Gender of respondents | |||||
| Female | 162 (68.4) | 75 (31.6) | .643a | 1.138 | 0.658-1.968 |
| Male | 59 (71.1) | 24 (28.9) | |||
| Occupation | |||||
| Private sector | 43 (62.3) | 26 (37.7) | .392a | 1.052 | 0.779-1.422 |
| Government Sector | 136 (70.8) | 56 (29.2) | |||
| Not working | 42 (71.2) | 17 (28.8) | |||
| Father’s educational level | |||||
| Low education | 98 (81.7) | 22 (18.3) | <.001a | 2.789 | 1.620-4.800 |
| High education | 123 (61.5) | 77 (38.5) | |||
| Mother’s educational level | |||||
| Low education | 92 (80.0) | 23 (20.0) | .002a | 2.357 | 1.376-4.035 |
| High education | 129 (62.9) | 76 (37.1) | |||
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | ||||
| Age, years | 32 (8) | 32 (6) | .420b | ||
| Family income, RM | 4000.00 (2100.00) | 5000.00 (4000.00) | .002b | ||
Abbreviations: POR, prevalence odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range.
aA chi-square test was performed; level of significance is at P < .05.
bMann-Whitney U test was performed; level of significance is at P < .05.
Parental Attitude
The majority of the parents (40.1%) preferred to give antibiotics rather than antipyretics (23.0%) and cough syrup (22.5%) to children with URTI. Only a few of the parents (7.8%) stated that they did not prefer prescription of antibiotics for their children by the doctor in case of cold and fever. Most of the parents (39.1%) stated that they would never administer antibiotics to their children without doctors’ advice, although they did not have spare time to visit pediatrician or did not have sufficient money to pay for the visit. The majority of the parents (37.5%) stated that they always follow pediatrician’s advice before prescribing antibiotics to their children, although they believed that their child’s condition was not serious.
Generally, 87.5% of the respondents were found to have a good level of attitude regarding antibiotic usage for treating children’s URTI. Table 3 shows the association between respondents’ sociodemographics and their attitude level, wherein only mother’s educational level was found to be significantly associated with their attitude level (POR = 2.19, 95% CI 1.121-4.267, P = .020). These results depicted that mothers with higher educational levels had higher attitude level.
Table 3.
Association Between Sociodemographics and Attitude Level.
| Attitude | P Value | POR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Poor, n (%) | Good, n (%) | ||||
| Gender of respondents | |||||
| Female | 28 (11.8) | 209 (88.2) | .564a | 1.262 | 0.609-2.612 |
| Male | 12 (14.5) | 71 (85.5) | |||
| Occupation | |||||
| Private sector | 7 (10.1) | 62 (89.9) | .795a | 0.665-1.558 | |
| Government sector | 25 (13.0) | 167 (87.0) | |||
| Not working | 8 (13.6) | 51 (86.4) | |||
| Father’s educational level | |||||
| Low education | 19 (15.8) | 101 (84.2) | .163a | 1.603 | 0.823-3.124 |
| High education | 21 (10.5) | 179 (89.5) | |||
| Mother’s educational level | |||||
| High education | 19 (9.3) | 186 (90.7) | .020a | 2.187 | 1.121-4.267 |
| Low education | 21 (18.3) | 94 (81.7) | |||
| Median (IQR) | Median (IQR) | ||||
| Age, years | 31 (5) | 32 (7) | .118b | ||
| Family income, RM | 4350.00 (2000.00) | 4100.00 (3000.00) | .444b | ||
Abbreviations: POR, prevalence odds ratio; CI, confidence interval; IQR, interquartile range.
aChi-square test was performed, level of significant is at P < .05.
bMann-Whitney U test was performed, level of significant is at P < .05.
Parental Practice
Some of the parents (31.6%) stated that they often asked their doctors whether the prescription of an antibiotic is necessary. A significant association was noted between gender and this practice (P = .023). Surprisingly, one-third (32.5%) of the parents completely followed all of the doctors’ instructions and advices. There was a significant association between this practice with the gender of the respondents, father’s educational level, mother’s educational level, and family income (P = .002, .001, .001, and <.001, respectively) as shown in table 4. Furthermore, 32.8% of the parents never insisted on their doctors to prescribe antibiotics as a precaution, although the diagnosis was not confirmed. A significant association between this practice with the gender of the respondents, father’s educational level, and family income was noted (P = .012, .001, and .019, respectively).
Table 4.
Association Between Sociodemographics and Practice Statements.
| Questiona | Sociodemography | Frequency | χ2 | P Value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Always (%) | Most of the times (%) | Often (%) | Sometimes (%) | Never (%) | ||||
| Q29b | Gender of respondents | |||||||
| Male | 26 (31.3) | 22 (26.5) | 17 (20.5) | 12 (14.5) | 6 (7.2) | 11.301 | .023 | |
| Female | 35 (14.8) | 79 (33.3) | 53 (22.4) | 44 (18.6) | 26 (11.0) | |||
| Occupation | ||||||||
| Private Sector | 15 (21.7) | 24 (34.8) | 13 (18.8) | 10 (14.5) | 7 (10.1) | 14.113 | .079 | |
| Government Sector | 32 (16.7) | 66 (34.4) | 48 (25.0) | 31 (16.1) | 15 (7.8) | |||
| Not working | 14 (23.7) | 11 (18.6) | 9 (15.3) | 15 (15.4) | 10 (16.9) | |||
| Father’s education | ||||||||
| Low education | 26 (21.7) | 33 (27.5) | 26 (21.7) | 23 (19.2) | 12 (10.0) | 1.996 | .737 | |
| High education | 35 (17.5) | 68 (34.0) | 44 (22.0) | 33 (16.5) | 20 (10.0) | |||
| Mother’s education | ||||||||
| Low education | 26 (22.6) | 31 (27.0) | 24 (20.9) | 22 (19.1) | 12 (10.4) | 2.780 | .595 | |
| High education | 35 (17.1) | 70 (34.1) | 46 (22.4) | 34 (16.6) | 20 (9.8) | |||
| Q30c | Gender of respondents | |||||||
| Male | 20 (24.1) | 19 (22.9) | 10 (12.0) | 17 (20.5) | 17 (20.5) | 12.843 | .012 | |
| Female | 44 (18.6) | 26 (11.0) | 59 (24.9) | 63 (26.6) | 45 (19.0) | |||
| Occupation | ||||||||
| Private sector | 14 (20.3) | 12 (17.4) | 15 (21.7) | 15 (21.7) | 13 (18.8) | 11.606 | .170 | |
| Government sector | 40 (20.8) | 28 (14.6) | 43 (22.4) | 52 (27.1) | 29 (15.1) | |||
| Not working | 10 (16.9) | 5 (8.5) | 11 (18.6) | 13 (22.0) | 20 (33.9) | |||
| Father’s education | ||||||||
| Low education | 24 (20.0) | 25 (20.8) | 6 (5.0) | 35 (29.2) | 30 (25.0) | 35.154 | <.001 | |
| High education | 40 (20.0) | 20 (10.0) | 63 (31.5) | 45 (22.5) | 32 (16.0) | |||
| Mother’s education | ||||||||
| Low education | 24 (20.9) | 17 (14.8) | 14 (12.2) | 29 (25.2) | 31 (27.0) | 12.801 | .012 | |
| High education | 40 (19.5) | 28 (13.7) | 55 (26.8) | 51 (24.9) | 31 (15.1) | |||
| Q31d | Gender of respondents | |||||||
| Male | 30 (36.1) | 14 (16.9) | 9 (10.8) | 7 (8.4) | 23 (27.7) | 17.330 | .002 | |
| Female | 74 (31.2) | 68 (28.7) | 37 (15.6) | 32 (13.5) | 26 (11.0) | |||
| Occupation | ||||||||
| Private sector | 25 (36.2) | 16 (23.2) | 9 (13.0) | 10 (14.5) | 9 (13.0) | 11.349 | .183 | |
| Government sector | 53 (27.6) | 58 (30.2) | 30 (15.6) | 20 (10.4) | 31 (16.1) | |||
| Not working | 26 (44.1) | 8 (13.6) | 7 (11.9) | 9 (15.3) | 9 (15.3) | |||
| Father’s education | ||||||||
| Low education | 57 (47.5) | 15 (12.5) | 20 (16.7) | 9 (7.5) | 19 (15.8) | 30.397 | <.001 | |
| High education | 47 (23.5) | 67 (33.5) | 26 (13.0) | 30 (15.0) | 30 (15.0) | |||
| Mother’s education | ||||||||
| Low education | 49 (42.6) | 15 (13.0) | 16 (13.9) | 14 (12.2) | 21 (18.3) | 17.779 | .001 | |
| High education | 55 (26.8) | 67 (32.7) | 30 (14.6) | 25 (12.2) | 28 (13.7) | |||
| Q32e | Gender of respondents | |||||||
| Male | 20 (24.1) | 15 (18.1) | 6 (7.2) | 8 (9.6) | 34 (41.0) | 12.809 | .012 | |
| Female | 34 (14.3) | 49 (20.7) | 42 (17.7) | 41 (17.3) | 71 (30.0) | |||
| Occupation | ||||||||
| Private sector | 10 (14.5) | 14 (20.3) | 9 (13.0) | 11 (15.9) | 25 (36.2) | 4.928 | .765 | |
| Government sector | 34 (17.7) | 37 (19.3) | 34 (17.7) | 30 (15.6) | 57 (29.7) | |||
| Not working | 10 (16.9) | 13 (22.0) | 5 (8.5) | 8 (13.6) | 23 (39.0) | |||
| Father’s education | ||||||||
| Low education | 22 (18.3) | 28 (23.3) | 5 (4.2) | 20 (16.7) | 45 (37.5) | 17.847 | .001 | |
| High education | 32 (16.0) | 36 (18.0) | 43 (21.5) | 29 (14.5) | 60 (30.0) | |||
| Mother’s education | ||||||||
| Low education | 22 (19.1) | 26 (22.6) | 9 (7.8) | 18 (15.7) | 40 (34.8) | 7.537 | .110 | |
| High education | 32 (15.6) | 38 (18.5) | 39 (19.0) | 31 (15.1) | 65 (31.7) | |||
| Q33f | Gender of respondents | |||||||
| Male | 21 (25.3) | 26 (31.3) | 7 (8.4) | 14 (16.9) | 15 (18.1) | 15.551 | .004 | |
| Female | 55 (23.2) | 79 (33.3) | 32 (13.5) | 59 (24.9) | 12 (5.1) | |||
| Occupation | ||||||||
| Private sector | 17 (24.6) | 29 (42.0) | 4 (5.8) | 16 (23.2) | 3 (4.3) | 13.860 | .085 | |
| Government sector | 41 (21.4) | 63 (32.8) | 29 (15.1) | 39 (20.3) | 20 (10.45) | |||
| Not working | 18 (30.5) | 13 (22.0) | 6 (10.2) | 18 (30.5) | 4 (6.8) | |||
| Father’s education | ||||||||
| Low education | 33 (27.5) | 33 (27.5) | 9 (7.5) | 32 (26.7) | 13 (10.8) | 8.806 | .066 | |
| High education | 43 (21.5) | 72 (36.0) | 30 (15.0) | 41 (20.5) | 14 (7.0) | |||
| Mother’s education | ||||||||
| Low education | 34 (29.6) | 33 (28.7) | 12 (10.4) | 25 (21.7) | 11 (9.6) | 4.297 | .367 | |
| High education | 42 (20.5) | 72 (35.1) | 27 (13.2) | 48 (23.4) | 16 (7.8) | |||
| Age | Family Monthly Income | |||||||
| Questiong | Frequency | Median (IQR, years) | Test | P Value | Median (IQR, RM) | Test | P Value | |
| Q29b | Always | 32.00 (6) | 2.678 | .613 | 4000.00 (3400.00) | 8.394 | .078 | |
| Most of the time | 32.00 (7) | 4800.00 (2929.00) | ||||||
| Often | 32.00 (6) | 4000.00 (2000.00) | ||||||
| Sometimes | 31.00 (8) | 4250.00 (4000) | ||||||
| Never | 33.00 (8) | 4000.00 (2375.00) | ||||||
| Q30c | Always | 32.00 (7) | 1.975 | .740 | 4125.00 (2000.00) | 13.847 | .008 | |
| Most of the time | 32.00 (9) | 4000.00 (.3500.00) | ||||||
| Often | 33.00 (6) | 5000.00 (2500.00) | ||||||
| Sometimes | 31.00 (7) | 4000.00 (3500) | ||||||
| Never | 32.00 (8) | 4000.00 (2150.00) | ||||||
| Q31d | Always | 33.00 (8) | 2.848 | .584 | 3500.00 (2450.00) | 26.618 | <.001 | |
| Most of the time | 32.00 (6) | 5000.00 (3000.00) | ||||||
| Often | 34.00 (6) | 4000.00 (200.00) | ||||||
| Sometimes | 31.00 (4) | 4000.00 (2500.00) | ||||||
| Never | 31.00 (7) | 4500.00 (2500.00) | ||||||
| Q32e | Always | 34.00 (7) | 9.078 | .059 | 4050.00 (2250.00) | 11.815 | .019 | |
| Most of the time | 31.00 (5) | 4000.00 (3000.00) | ||||||
| Often | 33.00 (6) | 5000.00 (1875.00) | ||||||
| Sometimes | 32.00 (7) | 4000.00 (3000.00) | ||||||
| Never | 32.00 (7) | 4000.00 (3050.00) | ||||||
| Q33f | Always | 32.00 (8) | 4.203 | .379 | 4000.00 (2000.00) | 9.817 | .044 | |
| Most of the time | 33.00 (8) | 4500.00 (2500.00) | ||||||
| Often | 32.00 (7) | 4000.00 (4500.00) | ||||||
| Sometimes | 33.00 (6) | 3942.00 (2000.00) | ||||||
| Never | 31.00 (5) | 4000.00 (2500.00) | ||||||
Abbreviation: IQR, interquartile range.
aA chi-square test was performed, level of significant is at P < .05.
bQ29: How often do you ask your pediatrician whether or not the prescription of antibiotics is necessary?
cQ30: How often do you ask directly your pediatrician to prescribe antibiotics?
dQ31: How often do you completely follow all the pediatrician’s instructions and advice?
eQ32: How often do you insist on your pediatrician’s prescribing antibiotics as a precaution even if any diagnosis is not confirmed?
fQ33: How often does your pediatrician inform you about your child’s disease and notifies you whether it is necessary or not to receive antibiotics?
gA Kruskal Wallis test was performed, level of significant is at P < .05.
Discussion
Knowledge
Our study showed that two-third of respondents had poor knowledge regarding antibiotic usage for treating children with URTIs. Only few parents recognized the most commonly used antibiotics, such as amoxicillin and penicillin, by the doctors for treating URTIs in children. Only 31.9% of the respondents were aware that antibiotics should not be administered to children with URTI because they are of viral origin, which is self-limiting. These results are comparable to studies conducted in Saudi Arabia and Macedonia, which reported 38.5% and 24.2%, respectively, recognized the correct antibiotics to be used in treating URTI.11,12 Lack of education about the difference between viral and bacterial infection has caused this misunderstanding, as medical doctors usually use the term “germs” instead of the type of microbial strain. Germ is a layman term usually used by doctors in consulting patients, without clearly stating viral or bacterial infection. Therefore, parents often tend to give antibiotics to treat all kinds of germ infections without acknowledging the underlying causative agents. Antibiotics had been treated as a “wonder drug” by parents for treating all kinds of symptoms.13 Based on our research, only one-fifth (23.4%) of the parents acknowledged that antibiotics have side effects, which are much lower than a previous study done in Cyprus that reported 93.0% of respondents knew that antibiotics have side effects.14 This result should be given attention, as inappropriate use of antibiotics may cause enhanced antibiotic resistance,6 and the parents might end up using antibiotics as the primary prevention treatment for their children with URTI, without knowing the side effects of the antibiotics.
Our results showed that the main source of information about antibiotics are medical doctors (46.1%). This result is similar to that from 2 studies conducted in Saudi Arabia and Cyprus.11,14 Although we are living in a high technology and informative era, only a small proportion of parents take initiatives in finding information regarding antibiotics through the Internet. This trend reflects that our population has no interest in accumulating more information about antibiotics. On the other hand, medical doctors have the maximum responsibility in educating the community, as majority of the parents rely on doctors for medical knowledge. Therefore, as a primary prevention step to treat this issue, doctors should spend more time in educating patients. This exercise would definitely enhance the amount of knowledge patient’s gain from the consulting doctors.15
The father’s educational level, mother’s educational level, and family income were identified as significant factors associated with the knowledge of parent regarding antibiotic usage in treating children’s URTI. This result is compatible with those obtained from similar studies conducted in Cyprus, Macedonia as well as Malaysia.12-14 We believe that parents with low education level are less exposed to information regarding antibiotics, including their usage, side effects, and indications. Even with well-prepared information regarding antibiotics available on Web site, magazines, or newspapers, less educated parents might find it difficult to comprehend and understand, therefore doctors play an important role in explaining the scenario to them in a simple manner. Moreover, parents with low income tend to have less access to knowledge regarding antibiotics too.
Attitude
With regard to the attitude, most of the respondents showed good attitudes toward antibiotic usage for treating URTI in children. However, some attitudes still need to be corrected. For instance, the majority of the parents preferred that the doctors prescribe antibiotics for cold and fever, while only few stated that they would never asked doctors to prescribe antibiotics. This result is much higher when compared to the results obtained from a previous study conducted in Penang, Malaysia.16 The British community also showed the same result as in Penang research, suggesting that parents prefer prescription of antibiotics for cold and fever.17 Moreover, we also noted that almost half of the respondents preferred doctors to prescribe antibiotics for their children with URTI. This result was higher when compared to that of a study conducted in Hulu Langat, Malaysia.13 Based on the research performed in Saudi Arabia,18 our result showed that almost three-quarters of the parents believed that antibiotics were needed for treating fever in children with acute URTI. On the other hand, research conducted in Greece reported a much higher percentage when compared to the present study.19 These researchers showed that most of the parents had a common misperception that most of the cold and fever conditions are responsive to antibiotics and can cure their children without knowing that these conditions are self-limiting. Therefore, to treat these symptoms, parents attend clinics that offer antibiotics. Although the respondents frequently asked for antibiotics, one-third of the respondent continued to get a doctor’s advice even when their child’s condition was not serious. This attitude showed that most parents are aware that self-prescribed antibiotics is not a feasible option.
The mother’s educational level has a significant association with the attitude of parents regarding antibiotics in managing URTI in children. This report is consistent with that by a study conducted in Irbid, Jordan, which showed that the mother’s education level influences the attitude of the mother toward managing children with URTI.20 It was not uncommon that most mothers brought their children to seek medical treatment in primary health clinic. Therefore, mothers who are highly educated understand the doctor’s explanation better and do not administer antibiotics to their children unnecessarily.
Limitation
There are several limitations in this study. First, this study was conducted in a primary health clinic located in Bandar Tasik Selatan, which is an urban area. Therefore, the result of this study may not represent the trend in the entire Malaysia. To improve on this issue, a larger scale study needs to be performed in different places, including urban and suburban areas, to obtain a diversified study population. The parents included in the study may have had a recall bias, wherein they could not remember the details that were asked in the questionnaires, for example, which was the most recently administered antibiotic to their children with URTI. To overcome this issue, we tracked the preexisting medical records of the patients and the treatment given for URTI.
Conclusions
Knowledge regarding antibiotic usage for treating children’s URTI remains lacking even now. However, despite this poor knowledge, most of the parents have an overall good attitude toward antibiotic use. Therefore, parental educational interventions through health promotions and educational campaigns should be conducted by medical doctors, as they are the main source of information for the parents.
Acknowledgments
We would like to convey our gratitude to associate professor Dr Kanaheswari A/P Yoganathan, pediatrician of UKMMC, in revising the adopted questionnaires. We also would like to thank associate professor Dr Aznida Firzah Abdul Aziz, the head of department of Family Medicine UKMMC, for permitting us to conduct this study at Bandar Tasik Selatan Clinic. Finally, we appreciate all respondents who were willing to answer the questionnaires.
Author Biographies
Chee Teck Koh is a final year studying Doctor of Medicine Degree at faculty of medicine, National University of Malaysia (UKM).
Hasanain Faisal Ghazi is a public health medicine specialist with Master and PhD degree from National University of Malaysia (UKM), he did a fellowship at United Nations University-International Institute for Global Health (UNU-IIGH) in 2012, then worked as a senior lecturer at department of community health at the National University of Malaysia (UKM) and currently working as senior lecturer at International Medical school, Management and science University, Malaysia.
Mohd Ikhwan Bin Ahmad is a final year studying Doctor of Medicine Degree at faculty of medicine, National University of Malaysia (UKM).
Nuraqilah Binti Abdul Samad is a final year studying Doctor of Medicine Degree at faculty of medicine, National University of Malaysia (UKM).
Karen Lai Ee Yu is a final year studying Doctor of Medicine Degree at faculty of medicine, National University of Malaysia (UKM).
Nurul Farhana Binti Ismail is a final year studying Doctor of Medicine Degree at faculty of medicine, National University of Malaysia (UKM).
Muhammad Amirul Aizat Bin Esa is a final year studying Doctor of Medicine Degree at faculty of medicine, National University of Malaysia (UKM).
Footnotes
Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Funding: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: authors received fund from UKM Medical Centre to conduct the research. No fund was received for authorship and publication of this article.
References
- 1. National Medicine Use Survey. 2007. Pharmaceutical Services Division and the Clinical Research Centre, Ministry of Health Malaysia.
- 2. Spellberg B, Guidos R, Gilbert D, et al. The epidemic of antibiotic-resistant infections: a call to action for the medical community from the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(2):155–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Costelloe C, Metcalfe C, Lovering A, Mant D, Hay AD. Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:c2096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Finkelstein JA, Davis RL, Dowell SF, et al. Reducing antibiotic use in children: a randomized trial in 12 practices. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):1–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Harnden A. P. R., Brueggemann AB, Mayon-White R, Crook DW, Thomson A, Mant D. Respiratory infections for which general practitioners consider prescribing an antibiotic: a prospective study. Arch Dis Child. 2007;92(7):594–597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Livermore DM. Minimising antibiotic resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2005;5(7):450–459. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Lim VK, Cheong YM, Suleiman AB. Pattern of antibiotic usage in hospitals in Malaysia. Singapore Med J. 1993;34(6):525–528. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Teng CL1, Achike FI, Phua KL, et al. General and URTI-specific antibiotic prescription rates in a Malaysian primary care setting. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2004;24(5):496–501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Scott JG, Cohen D, DiCicco-Bloom B, Orzano AJ, Jaen CR, Crabtree BF. Antibiotic use in acute respiratory infections and the ways patients pressure physicians for a prescription. J Fam Pract. 2001;50(10):853–858. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Bella H, Ai-Freihi H, El-Mousan M, Danso KT, Sohaibani M, Khazindar MS. Knowledge, attitudes and practices related to diarrhoea in Eastern Province, Saudi Arabia. J Family Community Med. 1994;1(1):40–44. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Abdulaziz HA, Haytham AS, Faizal NA, Abdulaziz UJ. Socio-demographic determinant of antibiotic misuse in children. Saudi Med J. 2013;34(8):832–840. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Edita A, Merita D, Ledjan M. Validation of the parental knowledge and attitude towards antibiotic usage and resistance among children in Tetovo, the Republic of Macedonia. Pharm Pract. 2014;12(4):467. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Chan GC, Tang SF. Parental knowledge, attitudes and antibiotic use for acute upper respiratory tract infection in children attending a primary healthcare clinic in Malaysia. Singapore Med J. 2006;47(4):266–270. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Rousounidis A, Vassiliki P, Adamos H, et al. Descriptive study on parents’ knowledge, attitudes and practices on antibiotic use and misuse in children with upper respiratory tract infections in Cyprus. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011;8(8):3246–3262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Mangione-Smith R, McGlynn EA, Elliot MN. Parents expectations for antibiotics, physician-parents communication and satisfaction. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155(7):800–806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Ling Oh A, Hassali MA, Al-Haddad MS, Syed Sulaiman SA, Shafie AA, Awaisu A. Public knowledge and attitudes towards antibiotic usage: a cross-sectional study among the general public in the state of Penang, Malaysia. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2010;5(5):338–347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. McNulty CAM, Boyle P, Nichols T, Clappison P, Davey J. Don’t wear me out - the public’s knowledge of and attitudes to antibiotic use. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;59(4):727–738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Dossari KA. Parental knowledge attitude and practice on antibiotic used for upper respiratory tract infection in children. Majmaah J Health Sciences. 2013;1(1):39–51. [Google Scholar]
- 19. Sotiria GP, Nikos S, Vassiliki P, et al. Antibiotic use for upper respiratory tract infections in children: a cross-sectional survey of knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of parents in Greece. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Nesrin AB, Huda G, Haya MA, Christine S, Muntaha G. Mothers’ knowledge and practices of managing minor illnesses of children under five years. J Res Nurs. 2012;18(7):651–666. [Google Scholar]