CWD is the only known TSE that affects free-ranging wildlife, specifically cervids such as elk, deer, moose, caribou, and reindeer. CWD has become endemic in both free-ranging and captive herds in North America, South Korea, and, most recently, northern Europe. The prion research community continues to debate the origins of CWD. Original foci of CWD emergence in Colorado and Wyoming coincident with the sheep TSE scrapie suggest that scrapie prions may have adapted to cervids to cause CWD. However, emerging evidence supports the idea that cervid PrPC may be more prone to misfolding to the pathological isoform. Here we test the hypothesis that cervid PrPC can spontaneously misfold to create de novo prions. Whether CWD can arise spontaneously as a sporadic TSE or represents a new TSE caused by cervid-adapted scrapie prions profoundly impacts surveillance and mitigation strategies.
KEYWORDS: chronic wasting disease, prions, protein misfolding cyclic amplification, spontaneous generation, strains
ABSTRACT
Substantial evidence supports the hypothesis that prions are misfolded, infectious, insoluble, and protease-resistant proteins (PrPRES) devoid of instructional nucleic acid that cause transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). Protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) has provided additional evidence that PrPRes acts as a template that can convert the normal cellular prion protein (PrPC) present in uninfected normal brain homogenate (NBH) into the infectious misfolded PrPRES isoform. Human PrPC has been shown to spontaneously convert to a misfolded pathological state causing sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD). Several investigators have reported spontaneous generation of prions by in vitro assays, including PMCA. Here we tested the rate of de novo generation of cervid prions in our laboratory using our standard PMCA protocol and NBH from transgenic mice expressing cervid PrPC (TgCerPrP mice). We generated de novo prions in rounds 4, 5, and 7 at low cumulative rates of 1.6, 5.0, and 6.7%, respectively. The prions caused infectious chronic wasting disease (CWD) upon inoculation into normal uninfected TgCerPrP mice and displayed unique biochemical characteristics compared to other cervid prion strains. We conclude that PMCA of cervid PrPC from normal brain homogenate spontaneously generated a new cervid prion strain. These data support the potential for cervids to develop sporadic CWD.
IMPORTANCE CWD is the only known TSE that affects free-ranging wildlife, specifically cervids such as elk, deer, moose, caribou, and reindeer. CWD has become endemic in both free-ranging and captive herds in North America, South Korea, and, most recently, northern Europe. The prion research community continues to debate the origins of CWD. Original foci of CWD emergence in Colorado and Wyoming coincident with the sheep TSE scrapie suggest that scrapie prions may have adapted to cervids to cause CWD. However, emerging evidence supports the idea that cervid PrPC may be more prone to misfolding to the pathological isoform. Here we test the hypothesis that cervid PrPC can spontaneously misfold to create de novo prions. Whether CWD can arise spontaneously as a sporadic TSE or represents a new TSE caused by cervid-adapted scrapie prions profoundly impacts surveillance and mitigation strategies.
Podcast: A podcast concerning this article is available.
INTRODUCTION
Prions cause diseases classified as transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs), which are characterized by distinct neuropathology, including neuronal loss, vacuolation, and astrogliosis, that eventually causes behavioral and cognitive defects and death (1–3). Bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) of cattle, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) of humans, scrapie of sheep and goats, and chronic wasting disease (CWD) of cervids (deer, elk, moose, caribou, and reindeer) are notable prion diseases that can be transmitted or inherited or can occur spontaneously. Mounting evidence supports the prion hypothesis that TSE pathogenesis is caused by the conversion of the normal host cellular prion protein (PrPC) into a protease-resistant, abnormal disease-causing isoform devoid of instructional nucleic acid (PrPRES) (4–7).
In vitro generation of infectious prion protein using protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) has substantiated the protein-only hypothesis. PMCA of prions occurs when a prion seed templates misfolding of PrPC present in uninfected normal brain homogenate (NBH) into the pathological, infectious isoform (8). Short bursts of sonication break up prion aggregates, creating more templates for further conversion of PrPC to PrPRES (9). Employing repeated cycles of incubation and sonication has led to efficient amplification of minute quantities of PrPRES using substrates from various species (9–12). Employing serial PMCA (sPMCA), or rediluting PMCA products into fresh NBH after a given number of rounds and continuing PMCA, has resulted in successful evaluations of strain adaptation and species barriers in the absence of lengthy and expensive bioassays (9, 13–16). Deleault et al. identified the minimal PMCA requirements for in vitro amplification resulting in spontaneous generation of infectious prions from noninfectious components: native hamster PrPC in combination with copurified lipids and synthetic polyanions (17). Barria et al. expanded on these findings and reported generating spontaneous mouse and hamster prions from uninfected normal brain homogenate substrate in a prion-free laboratory upon extended rounds and modification of normal sPMCA conditions (18).
The origins of CWD are openly debated. Discovery of the first CWD foci in areas of Colorado and Wyoming with relatively sparse populations of cervids suggests to some transmission of sheep scrapie, present in those locations, to deer and elk grazing nearby and perhaps gaining access to contaminated sheep pens (19). However, the possibility of spontaneously generated cervid prions causing sporadic CWD has not been excluded. Recently, the first natural cases of CWD in Europe were detected in Norwegian reindeer and moose that had no evident contact with animals or areas exposed to prions (20). Mounting evidence suggests that amino acids 170 to 174 of cervid PrPC form a rigid loop which increases the propensity for spontaneous misfolding (21–24). In order to detect and examine the rate of spontaneous conversion of cervid PrPC, we subjected unseeded, uninfected brain homogenate derived from cervid PrPC-expressing transgenic mice (TgCerPrPC mice) to seven rounds of PMCA with 48 cycles per round. In order to avoid the possibility of cross-contamination, all experiments were performed in a prion-free laboratory with new reagents and equipment. Here we report for the first time detection of protease K (PK)-resistant cervid PrPC by Western blotting (WB) at round 4 of sPMCA at a rate of 1.6%. Further generation of spontaneous prions was observed after round 5 and round 7, with rates of 5.0% and 6.74%, respectively. Bioassay determined that the spontaneously generated cervid prions were infectious to cervidized transgenic mice but not wild-type (WT) mice, and biochemical analysis revealed a unique prion profile differing from the profiles seen with prion strains used within our laboratory. These data strongly suggest that those prions arose spontaneously and not from contamination. We propose that the de novo generation of infectious cervid prions in our laboratory by PMCA spontaneously created a novel cervid prion strain, supporting the idea that cervid PrPC can spontaneously convert to cervid prions in vivo and the possibility of sporadic CWD.
RESULTS
Generation of de novo cervid prions using PMCA.
We have previously reported that NBH from transgenic mice expressing cervid PrPC (TgCerPrP mice) supports efficient PMCA amplification using a standard PMCA protocol (15, 25, 26). While false positives in our negative controls have been rare, even under conditions of strict measures the possibility of contamination cannot be dismissed. The rare false positives in our negative controls are primarily observed after 5 rounds of PMCA and occur sporadically, while true positives are generally observed by 3 rounds in multiple replicates. The late rounds at which we observed false positives led us to hypothesize that they arose from spontaneous misfolding of cervid PrPC rather than contamination. To test this hypothesis and determine the rate of PMCA false positives in our laboratory, we ran unseeded TgCerPrP mouse NBH through our standard sPMCA protocol. Three groups of 20 NBH samples were subjected to 8 rounds of sPMCA in a prion-free laboratory to avoid cross-contamination. Additionally, all reagents and equipment were new and brain homogenate was made in a different prion-free laboratory. After each round of PMCA (48 cycles of 30 min of incubation followed by 40 s of sonication), NBH samples were analyzed by protease K (PK) digestion and Western blotting, and any confirmed positives were removed from the PMCA plate to avoid contamination of the remaining negative samples.
Western blot analysis resulted in identification of one protease-resistant PrP (PrPRES) sample after 4 rounds of sPMCA (Fig. 1A) which generated de novo PrPRES at a rate of 1.7% that increased to cumulative rates of 5.0% and 6.7% after five and seven rounds of sPMCA, respectively (Fig. 1B).
De novo cervid prions are infectious.
To determine if de novo-generated prions were infectious, we intracerebrally (i.c.) inoculated TgCerPrP and WT mice with PK-resistant and Western blot-positive de novo prions generated by PMCA. Here we report that TgCerPrP mice but not WT mice inoculated with de novo prions displayed clinical signs of disease. Four of five TgCerPrP mice inoculated with de novo prions died by 317 days postinoculation (dpi), with a mean time to terminal disease of 273 ± 61 dpi (Table 1 and Fig. 2). We observed subclinical disease and identical strain characteristics in the fifth TgCerPrP mouse by biochemical and neuropathological analysis and include that mouse in subsequent prion strain characterization. De novo prion-infected TgCerPrP mice lost 15% of body weight and exhibited stiff tails, ataxia, and impaired hind limb extensor reflex (Fig. 2A). None of five WT mice inoculated with de novo cervid prions showed any signs of prion disease or infectivity in their brains after 500 dpi (Table 1). The disease course of de novo-infected TgCerPrP mice was comparable to that of TgCerPrP mice inoculated with the D10 cervid prion isolate (285 ± 55 dpi) but occurred over 100 days later than that seen with TgCerPrP mice inoculated with D10 that was adapted to mice via sPMCA using TgCerPrP brain homegenate (169 ± 4 dpi) or WT mice inoculated with mouse-adapted Rocky Mountain Laboratory (RML) scrapie (155 ± 6 dpi, Fig. 2B). The variance in the results with respect to the number of days from infection to terminal disease, measured by the standard deviation of the mean, was much larger in mice inoculated with the D10 primary isolate (55 dpi) or de novo prions (61 dpi) than in mice inoculated with adapted prion strains (4 to 6 dpi).
TABLE 1 .
Inoculuma | Mouse strain |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cervidized transgenic |
Wild type |
|||
Incidenceb | DPI + SDc | Incidence | DPI + SD | |
De novo | 4/5 | 273 ± 61 | 0/5 | >500d |
D10f | 8/8 | 285 ± 55 | 0/5 | >500 |
RMLf | NDe | ND | 6/6 | 155 ± 6 |
sPMCAD10f | 6/6 | 169 ± 4d | ND | ND |
Mice were inoculated intracerebrally.
Incidence = number of terminally sick mice/number of animals inoculated.
DPI ± SD, days postinoculation to terminal disease ± standard deviation.
P < 0.01 compared to de novo.
ND, no data.
Previously reported data.
De novo cervid prions display and propagate distinct glycoform profiles.
We also assessed the biochemical differences of de novo-generated prions from other laboratory prion strains. Glycoform ratios have been a useful tool for characterizing different prion strains as evidenced by the presence of a predominant diglycosylated band in CWD prions compared to a predominant monoglycosylated band of scrapie prions (15). We compared glycoform ratios of PK-digested de novo prions, de novo prions passaged through TgCerPrP mice, and D10 and RML prions by densitometric analysis of Western blots (Fig. 3A). De novo prions contained predominantly diglycosylated PrPRES (70 ± 3%), less monoglycosylated PrPRES (29 ± 2%), and virtually no unglycosylated PrPRES (1 ± 1%, n = 5, P < 0.01), clearly distinct from the D10 glycoform profile (63 ± 3% di-, 30 ± 2% mono-, and 7 ± 1% unglycosylated, P < 0.05, Fig. 3B). Prions generated upon passage of de novo prions into TgCerPrP mice (de novo p1) displayed a glycoform profile trending toward a more balanced ratio of diglycoforms (57 ± 2%) and monoglycoforms (37 ± 3%) reminiscent of but still distinct from the ratios seen with RML (20 ± 1% di-, 60 ± 2% mono-, and 20 ± 1% unglycosylated), D10, and the original de novo inoculum (P < 0.01).
De novo cervid prions display and propagate distinct conformational stabilities.
We further assessed de novo prion strain characteristics biochemically by denaturing prion-positive brain homogenate with increasing concentrations of guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl), followed by PK digestion and Western blot analysis of the remaining PrPRES (Fig. 4A). De novo prions exhibited a conformational stability [mean (GdnHCl)50 value, 2.25 ± 0.01 M] that was similar to that of D10 prions passaged through cervidized mice (D10p1) (2.35 ± 0.01 M) or serially amplified by PMCA (Amp D10) (2.33 ± 0.01 M) but was significantly different from D10 results (Fig. 4B, P < 0.001). Passage of de novo prions through TgCerPrP mice (de novo p1) resulted in a significantly higher (GdnHCl)50 value of 3.40 ± 0.01 M compared to all other strains, including amplified D10 prions passaged into cervidized mice (Amp D10 p1, 1.89 ± 0.01 M, P < 0.001).
De novo cervid prions cause distinct neuropathology and generate unique lesion profiles.
Next we assessed vacuolation, astrogliosis, and PrPRES deposition in brain areas of WT and TgCerPrP mice inoculated with de novo prions (Fig. 5). Brains of WT mice inoculated with de novo prions exhibited larger amounts of astrogliosis and vacuolation (Fig. 5J to R) than those of de novo prion-inoculated TgCerPrP mice (Fig. 5A to I) and negative-control mice (Fig. 5S to AA). Interestingly, astrogliosis in WT mice was diffuse and prominent throughout all brain sections (Fig. 5K and N and Q). In contrast, TgCerPrP mice exhibited much lower levels of reactive astrocytes in analyzed sections (Fig. 5B and E and H) but higher levels than negative controls (Fig. 5T and W and Z). Small amounts of dense punctate prion deposits, characteristic of cervid prions, were identified in brain sections of de novo prion-inoculated TgCerPrP mice (Fig. 5C and F and I) but were absent in inoculated WT mice (Fig. 5U and X and AA). Prominent PrPRES accumulation was consistently observed in the cerebellum (Fig. 5C), the hippocampus (Fig. 5F), and the dorsal medulla (Fig. 5I) in de novo prion-inoculated TgCerPrP mice. PrPRES deposits were located within the granular cells within the cerebellum of TgCerPrP mice, while vacuolation was prominent in the white matter of the arbor vitae. WT mice inoculated with de novo prions did not develop CWD or exhibit PrPRES staining but exhibited appreciable vacuolation and abundant reactive astrocytes.
We assessed neuropathology in seven additional brain areas (Fig. 6A) and generated a composite lesion profile score by summing scores for vacuolation, astrogliosis, and PrPRES deposition for all areas in de novo prion-inoculated mice (Fig. 6B and C). TgCerPrP mice had little to no GFAP staining in brain areas (Fig. 6B), but vacuoles were present in patterns similar to those seen with WT mice (Fig. 6C). PrPRES deposition was predominant in the reticular formation, medulla, and cerebellum but was completely absent in the hypothalamus of de novo prion-inoculated TgCerPrP mice (Fig. 6B and D). WT mice exhibited intense GFAP staining in all brain areas and moderate vacuolation in these areas except the hippocampus (Fig. 6C and E). However, WT mice accumulated no detectable PrPRES anywhere in their brains.
Analysis of total lesion profile scores represented in radar plots (Fig. 6 and D to G) revealed de novo-inoculated TgCerPrP mice that displayed clinical signs of disease and had PrPRES present in most brain areas and yet exhibited less overall neuropathology (Fig. 6B and D) than mice in other cohorts (Fig. 6C and E to G). WT mice inoculated with de novo prions had a composite lesion profile (Fig. 6E) similar to that seen with RML-inoculated WT mice (Fig. 6G), even though de novo-inoculated WT mice were not clinically sick and accumulated no PrPRES plaques even after >500 dpi (Fig. 6C).
DISCUSSION
Evidence supporting the idea of spontaneous generation of prions causing sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (sCJD) in humans (27–29) also supports related hypotheses about the inception of some animal prion diseases such as chronic wasting disease and scrapie. But distinguishing between a spontaneous prion event and infectious transmission in wild populations, such as cervids afflicted with CWD, for example, remains quite difficult. Carefully controlled laboratory experiments using transgenic mouse models and in vitro assays help tease apart these prionogenic pathways and provide valuable information concerning spontaneous prion generation.
Several prion research groups have reported the in vitro generation of de novo prions using PMCA (17, 18) and synthetic prions using recombinant PrP (30–32) and, inadvertently, by binding PrPC and presumable cofactors to metal (30). Previous publications of de novo generation of hamster or mouse PrPRES utilizing PMCA reported the requirement of synthetic polyanions and/or copurified lipids and reported modification of PMCA by increasing incubation and sonication cycles (17, 18). Here we report generation of de novo prions at a low frequency by standard PMCA methods, using normal brain homogenate in a prion-free environment.
Barria et al. reported the occurrence of spontaneous conversion of human, mouse, and hamster PrPC substrates using PMCA only by extending the number of PMCA cycles and rounds, where 240 cycles (5 days) constituted one round (18). These substrates did not generate de novo prions by standard PMCA protocols. Similar results were obtained in experiments using hamster substrate with addition of polyanions (33). Here we generated de novo prions using cervid PrPC substrate relatively easily using our standard PMCA protocol without additional PMCA cofactors, cycles, or rounds, suggesting that cervid PrPC misfolds more easily than human, hamster, or mouse PrPC. Altering the flexible loop that connects the β-2 strand and α2 helix of mouse PrP to the rigid loop found in cervid PrPC via amino acid substitutions S170N and N174T resulted in spontaneous prion disease in vivo (22), while changing the rigid loop structure from a 310- to a type I β-helix turn by introducing a Y169G mutation prevented prion disease (34). Additionally, cell-free misfolding and conversion assays of recombinant mouse PrP containing cervid amino acid substitutions that form the rigid loop had a higher propensity of misfolding than assays using WT recombinant PrP (24). We hypothesize that the unique rigid loop in the globular domain of cervid PrPC facilitates generation of spontaneous cervid prions by promoting thermodynamic instability and pathogenic misfolding. A recent report that CWD prions passaged either in vitro by PMCA or in vivo through TgCerPrP mice were able to template misfolding of human PrPC by PMCA (35) supports this hypothesis and implies that the rigid loop of cervid PrPC may contribute not only to spontaneous prion generation but also to facile strain adaptation. In toto, these data highlight a propensity of cervid PrPC to spontaneously misfold that could explain the seemingly facile transmission of CWD among cervids and portend significantly weakened species barriers as CWD prions evolve.
We characterized the de novo prions biologically, biochemically, and neuropathologically and compared them to other prion strains. We observed an incomplete attack rate and a delay in median time to terminal disease in TgCerPrP mice inoculated with de novo prions compared to D10 and a D10-seeded sPMCA product (sPMCA D10). WT mice were not susceptible to any of those cervid strains and contained no PrPRES in their brains by either PK analysis and WB or immunohistochemistry (IHC), indicating that the de novo prions were indeed cervid prions. We have previously shown that PMCA adapts prions in vitro as effectively as in in vivo passage in TgCerPrP mice (15). If de novo prions were identical to D10 prions or arose from contamination, we would expect transmission to susceptible mice to be as efficient as that seen with mouse-passaged D10 and sPMCA D10.
Biochemical and neuropathological lesion profiling also supports the idea of spontaneous generation of a new cervid prion strain. The glycoform profile and conformational stability of de novo prions were markedly different before and after passage through TgCerPrP mice from those of the other prion strains that we analyzed. The glycoform profile of de novo prions drifted toward a more balanced ratio of mono- and diglycosylated PrPSc. We also noticed a slight increase in conformational stability in the presence of 2 to 3 M GdnHCl, with the data appearing as a slight “hump” in the middle of the graph (Fig. 4). While quite subtle, it could indicate biphasic denaturation unique to de novo prions. We occasionally see a PK-resistant, electrophoretically unshifted product, indicative of a full-length, PK-resistant PrP species, in our negative-control PMCA samples. We suspect that this may be an intermediate form of PrP as it transitions from PrPC to PrPSc, causing the anomalous denaturation curve. We are currently investigating this possibility, as similar intermediate PrP species have been proposed previously (30). We are also assessing whether the strain adaptation trend continues and/or convergence of other strain characteristics toward an RML phenotype occurs upon further passage through mice. We exclude RML contamination contributing to these results because we used new facilities and equipment that had never been exposed to prions to generate de novo prions. We did not introduce RML into any of these rooms or equipment. The vastly different glycoform ratios and conformational stabilities of RML versus de novo prions also argue against RML or any other prion contamination accounting for our results.
In marked contrast to the results seen with primary CWD prion isolates or adapted CWD prion strains, inoculation of de novo prions into TgCerPrP mice generated a prion strain with greatly increased conformational stability, which may contribute to the observed increased incubation time and decreased mortality (36, 37). Neuropathologic analysis of TgCerPrP mice inoculated with de novo prions showed dense punctate plaques of PrPRES characteristic of CWD that were absent in WT and mock-infected controls. Curiously, WT mice inoculated with de novo cervid prions exhibited intense astrogliosis and significant vacuolation in the absence of PrPRES deposition and clinical signs of terminal disease. These criteria skewed the WT lesion profile score such that it exceeded that of terminally sick de novo-inoculated TgCerPrP mice. The age of control mice at time of necropsy likely contributed to the observed neuropathology. Perhaps WT mice were subclinical carriers of CWD prions at study termination. De novo cervid prions may adopt a conformation in vivo that masks the epitope of the antibodies we used for IHC, although we failed to detect any PrPRES using the same antibodies in our denaturing Western blots of brain homogenates from the same animals. Castilla et al. reported that a species barrier between Tg (porcine) mice and low-dose BSE prions resulted in a subclinical infection that became evident only after repassage into Tg (porcine) mice (38). We are currently exploring this possibility by serial passage of brain homogenate from nonclinical WT mice into additional WT mice.
In summary, we have generated with relative ease by PMCA a de novo CWD prion strain with novel biological, biochemical, and neuropathological features. These data provide further evidence that cervid PrPC exhibits tertiary structural plasticity that we hypothesize contributes to a higher propensity for misfolding and potentially weakened species barriers that could promote interspecies transmission.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Preparation of normal brain homogenate (NBH).
All NBH preparations were completed in a laboratory never previously exposed to prions. Mice were euthanized and perfused with 30-ml 5 mM EDTA–phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Whole brains were removed and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen. Brains were weighed and transferred into 1.5-ml Eppendorf tubes containing 2.5-mm-diameter glass beads. PMCA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM EDTA, PBS) with 2× Complete protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche) was added to make a 20% (wt/vol) solution. Samples were homogenized for 20 s at 4.5 m/s in a FastPrep machine (Biogene), cooled on ice for 2 min, and centrifuged at 14,000 × g for 10 s to reduce foaming. This process was repeated twice. NBH was diluted to a 10% (wt/vol) solution by adding an equal volume of PMCA conversion buffer containing 2% Triton X-100 and was incubated on ice for 20 min. NBH was clarified by centrifugation for 5 min at 1,500 × g, and supernatants were aliquoted into new tubes and stored at −70°C.
Serial PMCA.
sPMCA was conducted in a new prion-free laboratory separate from the laboratory in which the NBH was made. All reagents and equipment were new and had never been used in a prion-contaminated laboratory. sPMCA was modified from a previous protocol (15). Briefly, 50-µl samples of 10% NBH were placed into 20 wells of a 96-well microplate. The entire plate was suspended in the water bath of a new 3000MP sonicator (Misonix, Inc.) and sonicated at 70 to 85% maximum power for 40 s, followed by a 30-min incubation at 37°C. This cycle was repeated 48 times, constituting 1 round. For each additional round, 25 µl of NBH from the previous round was diluted into 25 µl of fresh NBH and subjected to another PMCA round. This process was repeated for a total of 8 rounds. Replicate experiments of 20 NBH samples were started 3 days apart, totaling 3 experiments and 60 NBH samples. Gloves were changed after each replicate group experiment, and Western blot analyses of the samples were performed immediately after the completed round to look for PK-resistant material. Any PK-resistant material that was definitively positive was not subjected to further rounds of PMCA to avoid cross-contamination of other samples. Those samples that were not definitively positive (low band intensities and banding patterns that mimicked those of undigested material) were subjected to another round of PMCA to confirm positivity. If the samples also showed positivity at the next round, the results were called positive at the previous round.
Mice.
B6129SF2/J mice (stock number 101045) were purchased from the Jackson Laboratories (Bar Harbor, ME). Tg(CerPrP)5037 mice were generated as previously described (39). All mice were bred and maintained at Lab Animal Resources, accredited by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Lab Animal Care International, in accordance with protocols approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at Colorado State University.
Sources and preparation of prion inocula.
Brain homogenates (10%) were prepared in PMCA buffer (4 mM EDTA, 150 mM NaCl, PBS). PMCA samples that were Western blot positive, indicating the presence of de novo prions, were pooled to be used as the inoculum. We diluted inoculum 1:10 in 320 mM sucrose supplemented with 100 units/ml penicillin and 100 µg/ml streptomycin (Gibco) in PBS 30 min prior to intracerebral inoculations. The remaining de novo brain homogenate from PMCA was further amplified to 10 rounds in order to create enough de novo positive brain material for biochemical analysis.
PK digestion and Western blotting.
Samples were digested with 50 μg/ml·PK (Roche) for 30 min at 37°C. The reaction was stopped by adding lithium dodecyl sulfate sample loading buffer (Life Technologies, Inc.) and incubating at 95°C for 5 min. Proteins were electrophoretically separated through 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen), and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore). Nonspecific membrane binding was blocked by incubation in 5% milk blocking solution (Bio-Rad) for 1 h. Membranes were then incubated for 1 h at room temperature with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated Bar224 anti-PrP monoclonal antibody (SPI bio) diluted 1:20,000 in Superblock (Pierce), washed six times for 10 min each time in PBS–0.2% Tween 20, and incubated for 5 min with enhanced chemiluminescent substrate (Millipore). Membranes were digitally photographed using a FujiDoc gel documentation system equipped with a cooled charge-coupled diode camera (Fuji). Densitometric analyses were performed using Quantity One software (Bio-Rad).
Prion inoculations and clinical scoring.
Mice were anesthetized by isofluorane inhalation. Thirty microliters of the inoculum was injected intracerebrally 3 mm deep through the coronal suture at a location 3 to 5 mm lateral to the sagittal suture. Mice were monitored daily for clinical symptoms of prion disease, including tail rigidity, impaired extensor reflex, akinesia, tremors, ataxia, 15% weight loss, and paralysis. Mice exhibiting any four of these symptoms or paralysis were scored terminally sick and euthanized.
Histochemistry and immunohistochemistry (IHC).
Tissues were fixed in 10% paraformaldehyde and embedded in paraffin, and 5- to 10-µm-thick sections were cut and mounted on glass slides. For PrP staining, tissue sections were deparaffinized, treated with concentrated formic acid for 30 min, and then autoclaved at 121°C in target retrieval solution (Dako) for 2 h, washed twice for 7 min each time in 1× PBS, treated with 0.3% H2O2–methanol for 30 min, and blocked for 1 h with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA)–PBS and mixed 1:1 in Superblock (Pierce). Excess block solution was tapped off, and sections were incubated with anti-PrP Bar 224 monoclonal antibody, recognizing PrP epitope from amino acids 141 to 151 (human sequence), diluted 1:500 in block solution for 1 h. Slides were then washed in PBS twice for 7 min each time and incubated 30 min with Envision plus horseradish peroxidase (HRP) mouse secondary antibody (Dako). After another two 7-min washes, slides were incubated for 5 to 7 min with AEC+ substrate-chromagen (Dako) and rinsed in PBS twice for 7 min each time and counterstained with hematoxylin. Slides were rinsed in H2O, immersed in a 0.1% sodium bicarbonate bluing reagent for 5 min, rinsed in tap water, and mounted on coverslips with aqueous mounting medium (Richard Allan Scientific). Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) staining was performed on a NexES automated IHC stainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc. Tucson, AZ). Sections were stained with H&E for 4 min at room temperature. Sections were stained with rabbit polyclonal antisera against GFAP (diluted 1:8) for 10 min at 37°C followed by biotinylated goat anti-rabbit Ig (mouse/rat adsorbed) for 8 min and then counterstained with hematoxylin for 4 min. Sections were visualized and digitally photographed using an Olympus BX60 microscope equipped with a cooled charge-coupled diode camera.
Glycoform ratios.
Western blots of 10% brain homogenates of infected mice (n = 5 per group) were analyzed by densiometric analysis (Quantity One). Di-, mono-, and unglycosylated banding intensities were calculated as percentages of the total density of each PK-treated sample. The averages of the results from three replicate samples were plotted on a triplot based on calculated glycoform ratios.
Conformational stability assay.
Conformational stability assays were modified from a previous protocol (15). Aliquots of brain homogenates (15 μl) from each mouse of each group (n = 5 per group) were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with increasing concentrations of guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCl; Sigma) ranging from 0 to 5 M in 0.5 M increments. Samples were precipitated in ice-cold methanol at −20°C overnight and centrifuged at 13,000 × g for 30 min at 4°C. Pellets were washed in PMCA buffer and centrifuged three times, resuspended in 18 μl of PMCA buffer, subjected to PK digestion, and Western blotted. Conformational stability was quantified by densitometric analyses of Western blots of triplicate samples from each mouse of each group, plotting the mean percentage of PrPRES remaining ± standard deviation (SD) as a function of GdnHCl concentration and using fourth-order polynomial equations and nonlinear regression (GraphPad Prism) to fit denaturation curves for each prion strain.
Lesion profiling.
Brain lesion profiling was performed as previously described (15) with slight modifications. Ten neuroanatomic regions were identified in coronal brain sections from all 5 mice of each group as follows: region 1, dorsal medulla; region 2, cerebellum; region 3, superior colliculus; region 4, reticular formation; region 5, hypothalamus; region 6, hippocampus; region 7, thalamus; region 8, cerebral cortex; region 9, primary somatosensory cortex; region 10, caudate-putamen. Pathologists blind to the group identification scored each region for vacuolation, astrogliosis, and PrPRES deposition using the following severity scale: 0, normal; 1, mild; 2, moderate, 3, significant; 4, severe. The average of the sum of the three scores constitutes the severity score for each region.
Statistical analyses.
One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Tukey posttest analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Morris Animal Foundation grant D08ZO-316 and a Colorado State University College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences Research Council grant funded this work.
We thank members of the Zabel laboratory and the Prion Research Center for critical reading of the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the sacrifice made by laboratory animals used in this study.
REFERENCES
- 1.Budka H, Aguzzi A, Brown P, Brucher JM, Bugiani O, Gullotta F, Haltia M, Hauw JJ, Ironside JW, Jellinger K, Kretzschmar HA, Lantos PL, Masullo C, Schlote W, Tateishi J, Weller RO. 1995. Neuropathological diagnostic criteria for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) and other human spongiform encephalopathies (prion diseases). Brain Pathol 5:459–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1995.tb00625.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Bendheim PE, Barry RA, DeArmond SJ, Stites DP, Prusiner SB. 1984. Antibodies to a scrapie prion protein. Nature 310:418–421. doi: 10.1038/310418a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.DeArmond SJ, McKinley MP, Barry RA, Braunfeld MB, McColloch JR, Prusiner SB. 1985. Identification of prion amyloid filaments in scrapie-infected brain. Cell 41:221–235. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90076-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Oesch B, Westaway D, Wälchli M, McKinley MP, Kent SBH, Aebersold R, Barry RA, Tempst P, Teplow DB, Hood LE, Prusiner SB, Weissmann C. 1985. A cellular gene encodes scrapie PrP 27–30 protein. Cell 40:735–746. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90333-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Büeler HR, Aguzzi A, Sailer A, Greiner RA, Autenried P, Aguet M, Weissmann C. 1993. Mice devoid of PrP are resistant to scrapie. Cell 73:1339–1347. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90360-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hope J, Morton LJ, Farquhar CF, Multhaup G, Beyreuther K, Kimberlin RH. 1986. The major polypeptide of scrapie-associated fibrils (SAF) has the same size, charge distribution and N-terminal protein sequence as predicted for the normal brain protein (PrP). EMBO J 5:2591–2597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Prusiner SB. 1982. Novel proteinaceous infectious particles cause scrapie. Science 216:136–144. doi: 10.1126/science.6801762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Saborio GP, Permanne B, Soto C. 2001. Sensitive detection of pathological prion protein by cyclic amplification of protein misfolding. Nature 411:810–813. doi: 10.1038/35081095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kurt TD, Telling GC, Zabel MD, Hoover EA. 2009. Trans-species amplification of PrP(CWD) and correlation with rigid loop 170N. Virology 387:235–243. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2009.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Murayama Y, Yoshioka M, Yokoyama T, Iwamaru Y, Imamura M, Masujin K, Yoshiba S, Mohri S. 2007. Efficient in vitro amplification of a mouse-adapted scrapie prion protein. Neurosci Lett 413:270–273. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2006.11.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Thorne L, Holder T, Ramsay A, Edwards J, Taema MM, Windl O, Maddison BC, Gough KC, Terry LA. 2012. In vitro amplification of ovine prions from scrapie-infected sheep from Great Britain reveals distinct patterns of propagation. BMC Vet Res 8:223. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-8-223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Nemecek J, Nag N, Carlson CM, Schneider JR, Heisey DM, Johnson CJ, Asher DM, Gregori L. 2013. Red-backed vole brain promotes highly efficient in vitro amplification of abnormal prion protein from macaque and human brains infected with variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease agent. PLoS One 8:e78710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Castilla J, Saá P, Hetz C, Soto C. 2005. In vitro generation of infectious scrapie prions. Cell 121:195–206. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Castilla J, Gonzalez-Romero D, Saá P, Morales R, De Castro J, Soto C. 2008. Crossing the species barrier by PrPSc replication in vitro generates unique infectious prions. Cell 134:757–768. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Meyerett C, Michel B, Pulford B, Spraker TR, Nichols TA, Johnson T, Kurt T, Hoover EA, Telling GC, Zabel MD. 2008. In vitro strain adaptation of CWD prions by serial protein misfolding cyclic amplification. Virology 382:267–276. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2008.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Green KM, Castilla J, Seward TS, Napier DL, Jewell JE, Soto C, Telling GC. 2008. Accelerated high fidelity prion amplification within and across prion species barriers. PLoS Pathog 4:e1000139. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Deleault NR, Harris BT, Rees JR, Supattapone S. 2007. Formation of native prions from minimal components in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:9741–9746. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0702662104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Barria MA, Mukherjee A, Gonzalez-Romero D, Morales R, Soto C. 2009. De novo generation of infectious prions in vitro produces a new disease phenotype. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Williams ES, Miller MW. 2002. Chronic wasting disease in deer and elk in North America. Rev Sci Tech 21:305–316. doi: 10.20506/rst.21.2.1340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Benestad SL, Mitchell G, Simmons M, Ytrehus B, Vikøren T. 2016. First case of chronic wasting disease in Europe in a Norwegian free-ranging reindeer. Vet Res 47:88. doi: 10.1186/s13567-016-0375-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sigurdson CJ, Nilsson KPR, Hornemann S, Manco G, Fernández-Borges N, Schwarz P, Castilla J, Wüthrich K, Aguzzi A. 2010. A molecular switch controls interspecies prion disease transmission in mice. J Clin Invest 120:2590–2599. doi: 10.1172/JCI42051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Sigurdson CJ, Nilsson KPR, Hornemann S, Heikenwalder M, Manco G, Schwarz P, Ott D, Rülicke T, Liberski PP, Julius C, Falsig J, Stitz L, Wüthrich K, Aguzzi A. 2009. De novo generation of a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy by mouse transgenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:304–309. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810680105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kurt TD, Jiang L, Bett C, Eisenberg D, Sigurdson CJ. 2014. A proposed mechanism for the promotion of prion conversion involving a strictly conserved tyrosine residue in the β2-α2 loop of PrPC. J Biol Chem 289:10660–10667. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.549030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kyle LM, John TR, Schätzl HM, Lewis RV. 2013. Introducing a rigid loop structure from deer into mouse prion protein increases its propensity for misfolding in vitro. PLoS One 8:e66715. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nichols TA, Pulford B, Wyckoff AC, Meyerett C, Michel B, Gertig K, Hoover EA, Jewell JE, Telling GC, Zabel MD. 2009. Detection of protease-resistant cervid prion protein in water from a CWD-endemic area. Prion 3:171–183. doi: 10.4161/pri.3.3.9819. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pulford B, Spraker TR, Wyckoff AC, Meyerett C, Bender H, Ferguson A, Wyatt B, Lockwood K, Powers J, Telling GC, Wild MA, Zabel MD. 2012. Detection of PrPCWD in feces from naturally exposed Rocky Mountain elk (Cervus elaphus nelsoni) using protein misfolding cyclic amplification. J Wildl Dis 48:425–434. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-48.2.425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Zerr I, Poser S. 2002. Clinical diagnosis and differential diagnosis of CJD and vCJD. With special emphasis on laboratory tests. APMIS 110:88–98. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0463.2002.100111.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brown P, Cathala F, Raubertas RF, Gajdusek DC, Castaigne P. 1987. The epidemiology of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: conclusion of a 15-year investigation in France and review of the world literature. Neurology 37:895–904. doi: 10.1212/WNL.37.6.895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.DeArmond SJ, Prusiner SB. 1995. Etiology and pathogenesis of prion diseases. Am J Pathol 146:785–811. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Edgeworth JA, Gros N, Alden J, Joiner S, Wadsworth JDF, Linehan J, Brandner S, Jackson GS, Weissmann C, Collinge J. 2010. Spontaneous generation of mammalian prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:14402–14406. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004036107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wang F, Wang X, Yuan CG, Ma J. 2010. Generating a prion with bacterially expressed recombinant prion protein. Science 327:1132–1135. doi: 10.1126/science.1183748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Makarava N, Kovacs GG, Bocharova O, Savtchenko R, Alexeeva I, Budka H, Rohwer RG, Baskakov IV. 2010. Recombinant prion protein induces a new transmissible prion disease in wild-type animals. Acta Neuropathol 119:177–187. doi: 10.1007/s00401-009-0633-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Deleault NR, Harris BT, Rees JR, Supattapone S. 2007. Formation of native prions from minimal components in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:9741–9746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Kurt TD, Bett C, Fernández-Borges N, Joshi-Barr S, Hornemann S, Rülicke T, Castilla J, Wüthrich K, Aguzzi A, Sigurdson CJ. 2014. Prion transmission prevented by modifying the β2-α2 loop structure of host PrPC. J Neurosci 34:1022–1027. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4636-13.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Barria MA, Telling GC, Gambetti P, Mastrianni JA, Soto C. 2011. Generation of a new form of human PrPSc in vitro by interspecies transmission from cervid prions. J Biol Chem 286:7490–7495. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.198465. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Safar J, Wille H, Itri V, Groth D, Serban H, Torchia M, Cohen FE, Prusiner SB. 1998. Eight prion strains have PrP(Sc) molecules with different conformations. Nat Med 4:1157–1165. doi: 10.1038/2654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Angers RC, Kang HE, Napier D, Browning S, Seward T, Mathiason C, Balachandran A, McKenzie D, Castilla J, Soto C, Jewell J, Graham C, Hoover EA, Telling GC. 2010. Prion strain mutation determined by prion protein conformational compatibility and primary structure. Science 328:1154–1158. doi: 10.1126/science.1187107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Castilla J, Gutiérrez-Adán A, Brun A, Doyle D, Pintado B, Ramírez MA, Salguero FJ, Parra B, Segundo FDS, Sánchez-Vizcaíno JM, Rogers M, Torres JM. 2004. Subclinical bovine spongiform encephalopathy infection in transgenic mice expressing porcine prion protein. J Neurosci 24:5063–5069. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5400-03.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Angers RC, Seward TS, Napier D, Green M, Hoover E, Spraker T, O’Rourke K, Balachandran A, Telling GC. 2009. Chronic wasting disease prions in elk antler velvet. Emerg Infect Dis 15:696–703. doi: 10.3201/eid1505.081458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]