Abstract
Introduction
Although cardiac rehabilitation is known as a tool to reduce the overall risk of cardiovascular complications, its specific role in the reduction of hs-CRP as a marker of inflammation and a proven marker of cardiovascular risk needs further investigation.
Aim
The present study aims at elucidating the effects of a full course of conventional cardiac rehabilitation program for the period of eight weeks, on the levels of hs-CRP in patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass surgery.
Material and Methods
In this case study, 30 consecutive patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass surgery (isolated CABGS), and a full 8-week cardiac rehabilitation program in Tehran Heart Center, were investigated. A group of 30 similar patients, who enrolled in the same period of rehabilitation program but did not participate in practice, was considered as a control group. Serum levels of hs-CRP in both groups were measured retrospectively and in similar days before the start of rehabilitation program and at the end of it (or 8 weeks after initial registration for the control group).
Results
Levels of hs-CRP in the rehabilitation group and control group were 5.9 7.7 and 6.3 6.9 respectively before start of the program which was not statistically meaningful (P-Value = 0.833). However, after the program, level of hs-CRP in the two tested groups changed to 2.3 5.1 and 5.7 6.1 respectively which showed a meaningful correlation (P-Value = 0.023). These results also showed that decrease in hs-CRP level in the rehabilitated group but not in the control group was statistically meaningful (with P-Value of 0.037 and 0.0723 respectively).
Conclusion
In patients undergoing coronary bypass surgery, participating in a full course of cardiac rehabilitation for 8 weeks has resulted in a significant reduction in hs-CRP levels as a marker of cardiovascular risk.
Keywords: High sensitive C - reactive protein (HS-CRP), Cardiac rehabilitation program, Coronary artery, Surgery, Patient
INTRODUCTION
To reduce the risk of coronary heart disease and cardiac mortality after myocardial ischemia, it is quite necessary to consider secondary prevention. Therefore improving physical activity and controlling risk factors such as inflammatory markers of these disorders is highly recommended (1).
The effect of cardiac rehabilitation programs to reduce mortality, improve physical capacity, control of blood pressure, control of vital signs and symptoms of heart or lung has been proven in many studies (2, 3). However, the effect of cardiac rehabilitation program on inflammatory markers in this disorder is not well known.
On the other hand, recent studies have shown that regular exercise significantly decreases serum levels of inflammatory markers (4, 5). This result could be an indication of the likely impact of the regular program of cardiac rehabilitation on the control of inflammatory processes that generate atherothrombosis in patients who suffer from cardiac disorders. Hence, determination of serum levels of hs-CRP index after cardiac rehabilitation program in patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery could give a better understanding of recurrence.
C-reactive protein (CRP) was first discovered in 1930 through a reaction with the somatic C polysaccharide of Streptococcus pneumonia in patients infected with pneumonia (6). Its correlation with coronary heart disease (CHD) was reported more than 60 years later in 1990 (7).
CRP has been extensively investigated and has long plasma half-life of 19 h. It is also quite easy to test with a standardized assay (8). CRP is an acute-phase protein and nonspecific marker of inflammation. The main production site of CRP is hepatocytes and it is consistent of five identical subunits. CRP is being secreted in response to several cytokines (9). Interleukin (IL)-6, one of the most potent drivers of CRP production, is released from activated leukocytes in response to infection or trauma and from vascular smooth muscle cells in response to atherosclerosis.
CRP directly binds highly atherogenic oxidized low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and is present within lipid-laden plaques (10, 11). The possible mechanistic role of CRP in plaque deposition is highly complex, exerting proatherogenic effects in many cells involved in atherosclerosis (12). CRP may facilitate monocyte adhesion and transmigration into the vessel wall (13). Moreover, M1 macrophage polarization, catalyzed by CRP, is a proinflammatory trigger in plaque deposition, prompting macrophage infiltration of both fat tissue and atherosclerotics (14).
In addition to triggering immunity in plaque deposition, in vitro studies have also shown relation among CRP, inhibition of endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and debilitated vasoreactivity (15, 16). Monomeric CRP is stimulated by platelet activation and has prothrombotic and inflammatory properties of its own (17). Monomeric CRP has also been found in plaques, particularly in regions of monocyte-mediated inflammatory activity, and within lipid microdomains of endothelial cells (18).
Correlation between hs-CRPand risks of CVD has been described in many studies (19). The Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial was the first of many primary prevention, prospective epidemiological studies to show a strong relationship between levels of hs-CRP and mortality from CHD in high-risk middle aged men (7). A similar association between elevated hs-CRP levels and subsequent rate of mass index and susceptibility for stroke was found in an investigation of apparently healthy men (20).
The present study aims at elucidating the effects of a full course of conventional cardiac rehabilitation program for the period of eight weeks, on the levels of hs-CRP in patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass surgery.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
All of patients who underwent CABG and were candidate for the rehabilitation program were included in this study. Those patients who were not able to participate in the program (unstable angina, unstable arrhythmia…) or were unwilling to do so were excluded from the study. All patients have signed consent forms before entering the study.
5 ml of blood samples from fasting patients 12 L 14 an hour had passed, they were taken to measure serum hs-CRP was sent to the laboratory. The index level was measured using a laser-based fluorescent analytic system. Measurement was done in two periods of time; at the time of administration for the program and at the end of rehabilitation period. The study was conducted at the Tehran Heart Center. Rehabilitation program consisted of 24 sessions over a period of 8 weeks.
The duration of each session was about thirty minutes and was performed as follow:
Warm-up (3-5 min
Aerobic Exercise (32-45 min)
Cool-down (3-5 min)
Aerobic exercise has a certain protocol and is set according to ‘Maximum Heart Rate’ and ‘Risk Stratification’. In addition, at the beginning of the project, all patients underwent the training program includes counseling and nutrition. The normal distribution of continuous variables was checked with paired t-test.
RESULTS
Rehabilitation and control groups were similar in demographic characteristics. Also there was no significant difference in risk factors of heart disease between two groups (Table 1).
Table 1.
Data | Rehabilitation Group (n=30) (%) | Control Group (n=30) (%) | P-Value |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Male Gender | 26 (87.6) | 24 (80.0) | 0.835 |
Age (Years) | 59.8 ± 9.1 | 62.2 ± 9.0 | 0.309 |
BMI (kg/m2) | 27.3 ± 3.9 | 26.8 ± 3.5 | 0.603 |
Smoker | 10 (33.4) | 7 (23.7) | 0.520 |
Diabetes Mellitus | 9 (30) | 8 (26.7) | 0.830 |
Hyperlipidemia | 15 (50.0) | 17 (56.6) | 0.775 |
Hypertension | 13 (43.3) | 14 (46.7) | 0.873 |
Family history of CAD | 15 (50.9) | 17 (56.6) | 0.775 |
Renal Failure | 1 (3.3) | 0 (0.0) | 0.999 |
Ejection Fraction | 48.4 ± 8.2 | 48.1 ± 8.7 | 0.891 |
Function Class I | 25 (83.3) | 26 (86.7) | 0.918 |
Function Class II | 5 (16.7) | 4 (13.3) | 0.756 |
Table 2 represents results of comparison of HS-CRP level between two tested groups. Levels of HS-CRP in the rehabilitation group and control group were 5.9 7.7 and 6.3 6.9 respectively before start of the program which was not statistically meaningful (P-Value = 0.833). However, after the program, level of HS-CRP in the two tested groups changed to 2.3 5.1 and 5.7 6.1 respectively which showed a meaningful correlation (P-Value = 0.023). These results also showed that decrease in HS-CRP level in the rehabilitated group but not in the control group was statistically meaningful (with P-Value of 0.037 and 0.0723 respectively).
Table 2.
Before Rehabilitation | After Rehabilitation | P-Value | |
---|---|---|---|
| |||
Rehabilitation Group | 5.9 ± 7.7 | 2.3 ± 5.1 | 0.037 |
Control Group | 6.3 ± 6.9 | 5.7 ± 6.1 | 0.723 |
P-Value | 0.833 | 0.023 |
Categorical data are expressed as number (%), continuous variables as mean and standard deviation (mean ± SD).
DISCUSSION
Inflammation plays an important role in the development of atherosclerotic plaque. The most important inflammatory marker known for ischemic heart disease is hs-CRP. This indicator plays an important role in the prognosis of patients with cardiac ischemia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of cardiac rehabilitation on the serum index of this factor in the patients after coronary bypass surgery.
Our results showed that participation in cardiac rehabilitation program could reduce serum levels of the hs-CRP. This finding is consistent with results of some of the previous studies (21).
The World Health Organization (WHO) has defined cardiac rehabilitation as the “sum of activity and interventions required to ensure the best possible physical, mental and social conditions so that patients with chronic or post-acute cardiovascular disease may, by their own efforts, preserve or resume their proper place in society and lead an active life” (22).
Cardiac rehabilitation programs, particularly home-based approaches, are well evidenced for secondary prevention in cardiovascular patients. To allow intervention optimization, clinical trials need to apply theory throughout the design, implementation and evaluation stages of the intervention development (23). There is growing evidence that hs-CRP is an important marker of cardiovascular risk and is linked to the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, providing additional value in primary and secondary prevention. Despite the limitations to its use in routine clinical practice, particularly interindividual variability, the available data indicate that selective determination of hs-CRP is useful in individuals with intermediate cardiovascular risk (10-20% risk at 10 years) in order to optimize risk stratification and clinical management.
A meta regression analysis of nearly 82,000 patients that compared clinical outcomes of lowering LDL-C levels from 10 statin trials versus 9 nonstatin trials showed a 1:1 relationship between LDL-C lowering and CHD and stroke reduction during 5 years of treatment (24). This challenges the idea that pleiotropic effects of statins contribute additional CV risk reduction benefit beyond that expected from the degree of LDL-C lowering. Indeed, some evidence suggests that the previously described proatherogenic effects of CRP may have been overstated because of contamination from endotoxins and use of preservatives in commercial CRP assays (25). Additionally, some basic science research disputes the direct atherogenic effects of CRP. Transgenic over expression of CRP in mice and in vivo injection of large doses of human CRP have minimal effect on inflammation and atherosclerosis (26-30).
Age, recent MI and intra-operative transfusion of red blood cells were also risk factors of peri-operative myocardial infarction and low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery. Patients, suffered from cardiovascular events post-operatively, were older, higher number of patients had recent MI and received donated RBCs intra-operatively but the transfusion of red blood cells remained and independent risk factor of combined cardiovascular event after CABG surgery (31).
Circulating levels of CRP have been shown to increase in patients suffering from acute MI or chronic heart failure (32). Others have found elevated CRP levels among obese or diabetic patients, and correlation of CRP with age (33). In another study, transgenic rabbits with low and high CRP expression fed a high-cholesterol diet experienced similar coronary and aortic atherosclerosis (34).
Long-term decline in CRP is also observed in obese patients (35). Therefore one of important benefits of rehabilitation program in reducing hs-CPR, is its possible impact on the fat tissue. Previous studies have shown that weight loss was significantly associated with a reduction in CRP levels (36). Okita et al., have studied 199 healthy women who participated in the two-month period of exercise and have lose three kilograms of their weight (37). In this study, the waist size and body mass index were the most important predictors of CRP levels, indicating a role in accelerating the process of inflammation in obese individuals. However, other aspects of cardiac rehabilitation such as nutrition advice and planning to continue training after the completion of rehabilitation can be helpful in improving the inflammatory processes in these patients. interestingly, a prospective study which aimed to evaluate the effects of exercise on men showed that regular exercise over a period of nine months is associated with a significant reduction in median CRP (38). These studies show that the various components of the rehabilitation program help in decrease in the levels of CRP.
Other studies have focused on the role of genetic factors in the development of inflammatory process. Obisesan et al, have studied some of CRP gene variations in relation with exercise and concluded that inhibition of some gene variations that are associated with the CRP is correlated with regular exercise (39). The study showed that patients homozygous for the common haplotype A / G-732 / + 219 have the highest baseline levels of CRP before start of an exercise program. However, CRP genotypes and haplotypes that were examined in this study had no effect on changes in CRP level that is related to exercise.
It is noteworthy that in 2010, a study by Hemingway et al. evaluating the quality of research into the prognostic value of CRP in stable CAD. Researchers concluded that about 83 of studies that have been analyzed suffered from a variety of biases and therefor any link between hs-CRP and prognosis is so weak that it cannot be used as the basis for clinical recommendations (40).
CONCLUSION
In summary, it can be concluded that cardiac rehabilitation might be associated with a significant reduction in serum levels of hs-CRP. Part of this positive effect could be related to weight loss that happens in the interim of rehabilitation program. To prove this connection, it is suggested to conduct a study that specifically evaluates the relationship between reduction of obesity (visceral fat reduction) following cardiac rehabilitation and hs-CRP level.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare that no conflicting interests exist.
REFERENCES
- 1.Verges Bl. Comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation improves the control of dyslipidemia in secondary prevention. J. Cardiopulm Rehabil. 1998;18:408–415. doi: 10.1097/00008483-199811000-00002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mosca L, Manson JE, Sutherland SE, et al. Cardiovascular disease in women: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Writing Group. Circulation. 1997;96:2468–2482. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.7.2468. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kuller LH, Tracy RP, Shaten J, et al. Relation of C-reactive protein and coronary heart disease in the MRFIT nested case-control study. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1996;144:537–547. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008963. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Vigushin DM, Pepys MB, Hawkins PN. Metabolic and scintigraphic studies of radioiodinated human C-reactive protein in health and disease. J. Clin. Invest. 1993;91:1351–1357. doi: 10.1172/JCI116336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Norata GD. Deficiency of the long pentraxin PTX3 promotes vascular inflammation and atherosclerosis. Circulation. 2009;120:699–708. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.806547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Libby P. Inflammation in atherosclerosis. Nature. 2002;420:868–874. doi: 10.1038/nature01323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Zhang YX, Cliff WJ, Schoefl GI, et al. Coronary C-reactive protein distribution: its relation to development of atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis. 1999;145:375–379. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9150(99)00105-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Libby P, Nahrendorf M, Pittet MJ, et al. Diversity of denizens of the atherosclerotic plaque: not all monocytes are created equal. Circulation. 2008;117:3168–3170. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.783068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kones R. Primary prevention of coronary heart disease: integration of new data, evolving views, revised goals, and role of rosuvastatin in management. A comprehensive survey. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2011;5:325–380. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S14934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Guan H. Adeno-associated virus-mediated human C-reactive protein gene delivery causes endothelial dysfunction and hypertension in rats. Clin. Chem. 2009;55:274–284. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.115857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Musunuru K. The use of high-sensitivity assays for C-reactive protein in clinical practice. Nat. Clin. Pract. Cardiovasc Med. 2008;5:621–635. doi: 10.1038/ncpcardio1322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ridker PM. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997;336:973–979. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199704033361401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Caulin-Glaser T, Falko J, Hindman L, et al. Cardiac rehabilitation is associated with an improvement in C-reactive protein levels in both men and women with cardiovascular disease. J. Cardiopulm Rehabil. 2005;25:332–336. doi: 10.1097/00008483-200511000-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Rehabilitation after cardiovascular diseases, with special emphasis on developing countries. Report of a WHO Expert Committee. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1993;831:1–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Heron N. Systematic review of the use of behaviour change techniques (BCTs) in home-based cardiac rehabilitation programmes for patients with cardiovascular disease-protocol. Syst. Rev. 2015;4:164. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0149-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Robinson JG. Pleiotropic effects of statins: benefit beyond cholesterol reduction? A meta-regression analysis. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2005;46:1855–1862. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hingorani AD, Sabbah W, Hingorani AD, et al. Is it important to measure or reduce C-reactive protein in people at risk of cardiovascular disease? Eur. Heart J. 2012;33:2258–2264. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Trion A. No effect of C-reactive protein on early atherosclerosis development in apolipoprotein E*3-leiden/human C-reactive protein transgenic mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25:1635–1640. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000171992.36710.1e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Balciunas M. Pre-operative high sensitive C-reactive protein predicts cardiovascular events after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a prospective observational study. Ann. Card. Anaesth. 2009;12:127–132. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.53442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Alonso-Martinez JL. C-reactive protein as a predictor of improvement and readmission in heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2002;4:331–336. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(02)00021-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Visser M. Elevated C-reactive protein levels in overweight and obese adults. JAMA. 1999;282:2131–2135. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.22.2131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Koike T. Human C-reactive protein does not promote atherosclerosis in transgenic rabbits. Circulation. 2009;120:2088–2094. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.872796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Campbell PT. A yearlong exercise intervention decreases CRP among obese postmenopausal women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2009;41:1533–1539. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31819c7feb. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tchernof A. Weight loss reduces C-reactive protein levels in obese postmenopausal women. Circulation. 2002;105:564–569. doi: 10.1161/hc0502.103331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Okita K. Can exercise training with weight loss lower serum C-reactive protein levels? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24:1868–1873. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000140199.14930.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Trion A, de Maat MP, Jukema JW, et al. No effect of C-reactive protein on early atherosclerosis development in apolipoprotein E*3-leiden/human C-reactive protein transgenic mice. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2005;25(8):1635–1640. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000171992.36710.1e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tennent GA, Hutchinson WL, Kahan MC, et al. Transgenic human CRP is not pro-atherogenic, pro-atherothrombotic or pro-inflammatory in apoE-/- mice. Atherosclerosis. 2008;196(1):248–255. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2007.05.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Clapp BR, Hirschfield GM, Storry C, et al. Inflammation and endothelial function: direct vascular effects of human C-reactive protein on nitric oxide bioavailability. Circulation. 2005;111(12):1530–1536. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000159336.31613.31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Pepys MB. Proinflammatory effects of bacterial recombinant human C-reactive protein are caused by contamination with bacterial products, not by C-reactive protein itself. Circ. Res. 2005;97(11):e97–103. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000193595.03608.08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hirschfield GM, Gallimore JR, Kahan MC, et al. Transgenic human C-reactive protein is not proatherogenic in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2005;102(23):8309–8314. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0503202102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Balciunas M. Pre-operative high sensitive C-reactive protein predicts cardiovascular events after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a prospective observational study. Ann. Card. Anaesth. 2009;12(2):127–132. doi: 10.4103/0971-9784.53442. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Alonso-Martinez JL, Llorente-Diez B, Echegaray-Agara M, et al. C-reactive protein as a predictor of improvement and readmission in heart failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2002;4(3):331–336. doi: 10.1016/s1388-9842(02)00021-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Visser M, Bouter LM, McQuillan GM, et al. Elevated C-reactive protein levels in overweight and obese adults. JAMA. 1999;282(22):2131–2135. doi: 10.1001/jama.282.22.2131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Koike T, Kitajima S, Yu Y, et al. Human C-reactive protein does not promote atherosclerosis in transgenic rabbits. Circulation. 2009;120(21):2088–2094. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.872796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Campbell PT, Campbell KL, Wener MH, et al. A yearlong exercise intervention decreases CRP among obese postmenopausal women. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2009;41(8):1533–1539. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e31819c7feb. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Tchernof A, Nolan A, Sites CK, et al. Weight loss reduces C-reactive protein levels in obese postmenopausal women. Circulation. 2002;105(5):564–569. doi: 10.1161/hc0502.103331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Okita K, Nishijima H, Murakami T, et al. Can exercise training with weight loss lower serum C-reactive protein levels? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(10):1868–1873. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000140199.14930.32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mattusch F, Dufaux B, Heine O, et al. Reduction of the plasma concentration of C-reactive protein following nine months of endurance training. Int. J. Sports Med. 2000;21(1):21–24. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-8852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Obisesan TO, Leeuwenburgh C, Phillips T, et al. C-reactive protein genotypes affect baseline, but not exercise training-induced changes, in C-reactive protein levels. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2004;24(10):1874–1879. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000140060.13203.22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hemingway H. Evaluating the quality of research into a single prognostic biomarker: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 83 studies of C-reactive protein in stable coronary artery disease. PLoS Med. 2010;7(6):e1000286. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]