Abstract
Transposon insertion mutants of Agrobacterium rhizogenes were screened to obtain mutant bacteria that failed to bind to carrot suspension culture cells. A light microscope binding assay was used. The bacterial isolates that were reduced in binding to carrot cells were all avirulent on Bryophyllum diagremontiana leaves and on carrot root disks. The mutants did not appear to be altered in cellulose production. The composition of the medium affected the ability of the parent and mutant bacteria to bind to carrot cells. The parent strain bound to carrot cells in greatest numbers in low-ionic-strength media such as 4% sucrose but still showed significant binding in Murashige-Skoog tissue culture medium. All of the mutants showed reduced binding in 4% sucrose after 2 h of incubation with carrot cells. One mutant was delayed in binding in 4% sucrose. This mutant and one other mutant also showed reduced binding to carrot cells in Murashige-Skoog medium. To determine whether the Tn5 insertion was responsible for the mutant phenotype, DNA containing the Tn5 insertion was cloned from the mutant bacteria and used to introduce Tn5 into the parent strain in the same location as in the original mutant by marker exchange. The resulting transconjugants had the same avirulent, nonattaching phenotype as the original mutants, suggesting that the mutant phenotype was due to the Tn5 insertion. The cloned DNA containing the Tn5 insertion was also tested for homology to DNA of known genes that affect attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to plant cells by DNA hybridization. No homology to chv, att, or pscA clones was observed. In addition, cloned chv, att, and pscA genes from A. tumefaciens were unable to complement the attachment-minus A. rhizogenes mutants. Thus, the A. rhizogenes nonattaching mutants appear to be different from the previously described A. tumefaciens mutants.
Full text
PDF
Images in this article
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Chilton M. D., Drummond M. H., Merio D. J., Sciaky D., Montoya A. L., Gordon M. P., Nester E. W. Stable incorporation of plasmid DNA into higher plant cells: the molecular basis of crown gall tumorigenesis. Cell. 1977 Jun;11(2):263–271. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(77)90043-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Douglas C. J., Halperin W., Nester E. W. Agrobacterium tumefaciens mutants affected in attachment to plant cells. J Bacteriol. 1982 Dec;152(3):1265–1275. doi: 10.1128/jb.152.3.1265-1275.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Douglas C. J., Staneloni R. J., Rubin R. A., Nester E. W. Identification and genetic analysis of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens chromosomal virulence region. J Bacteriol. 1985 Mar;161(3):850–860. doi: 10.1128/jb.161.3.850-860.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hughes J., McCully M. E. The use of an optical brightener in the study of plant structure. Stain Technol. 1975 Sep;50(5):319–329. doi: 10.3109/10520297509117082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lippincott B. B., Lippincott J. A. Bacterial attachment to a specific wound site as an essential stage in tumor initiation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol. 1969 Feb;97(2):620–628. doi: 10.1128/jb.97.2.620-628.1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matthysse A. G. Characterization of nonattaching mutants of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol. 1987 Jan;169(1):313–323. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.1.313-323.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matthysse A. G., Holmes K. V., Gurlitz R. H. Elaboration of cellulose fibrils by Agrobacterium tumefaciens during attachment to carrot cells. J Bacteriol. 1981 Jan;145(1):583–595. doi: 10.1128/jb.145.1.583-595.1981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matthysse A. G. Role of bacterial cellulose fibrils in Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection. J Bacteriol. 1983 May;154(2):906–915. doi: 10.1128/jb.154.2.906-915.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matthysse A. G., Wyman P. M., Holmes K. V. Plasmid-dependent attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to plant tissue culture cells. Infect Immun. 1978 Nov;22(2):516–522. doi: 10.1128/iai.22.2.516-522.1978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ohyama K., Pelcher L. E., Schaefer A. In Vitro Binding of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to Plant Cells from Suspension Culture. Plant Physiol. 1979 Feb;63(2):382–387. doi: 10.1104/pp.63.2.382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ruvkun G. B., Ausubel F. M. A general method for site-directed mutagenesis in prokaryotes. Nature. 1981 Jan 1;289(5793):85–88. doi: 10.1038/289085a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomashow M. F., Karlinsey J. E., Marks J. R., Hurlbert R. E. Identification of a new virulence locus in Agrobacterium tumefaciens that affects polysaccharide composition and plant cell attachment. J Bacteriol. 1987 Jul;169(7):3209–3216. doi: 10.1128/jb.169.7.3209-3216.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]