Abstract
The sodium/bile acid cotransporter NTCP was recently identified as a receptor for hepatitis B virus (HBV). NTCP is glycosylated and the role of glycans in protein trafficking or viral receptor activity is not known. NTCP contains two N-linked glycosylation sites and asparagine amino acid residues N5 and N11 were mutated to a glutamine to generate NTCP with a single glycan (NTCP-N5Q or NTCP- N11Q) or no glycans (NTCP- N5,11Q). HepG2 cells expressing NTCP with a single glycan supported HBV infection at a comparable level to NTCP-WT. The physiological function of NTCP, the uptake of bile acids, was also not affected in cells expressing these single glycosylation variants, consistent with their trafficking to the plasma membrane. However, glycosylation-deficient NTCP (NTCP-N5,11Q) failed to support HBV infection, showed minimal cellular expression and was degraded in the lysosome. This affected the physiological bile acid transporter function of NTCP-N5,11Q in a similar fashion. In conclusion, N-glycosylation is required for efficient NTCP localization at the plasma membrane and subsequent HBV infection and these characteristics are preserved in NTCP carrying a single carbohydrate moiety.
Introduction
The sodium-dependent taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) is an integral membrane glycoprotein that participates in the enterohepatic circulation of bile acids [1]. NTCP is expressed exclusively at the basolateral membrane of hepatocytes in the liver [2] and mediates the uptake of glycine/taurine-conjugated bile acids from the portal vein [3–5].
NTCP was recently identified as the bona fide receptor for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) [6]. HBV and HDV share the same envelope consisting of a membrane lipid bilayer into which the small (S), medium (M) and large (L) HBV envelope glycoproteins are integrated. All three envelop proteins share the S domain, but M and L N-terminally have an additional preS2 or preS1 and preS2 domain, respectively. L is responsible for the specific receptor binding via amino acids 157–165 in its pre-S1 domain, which interact with the third extracellular domain of NTCP [6]. Silencing NTCP expression in HepaRG cells inhibits HBV and HDV infection and exogenous expression in hepatocyte-derived cell lines HepG2 and Huh-7 confers permissivity to both viruses [6, 7].
HBV or HDV particle entry into hepatocytes occurs via a multistep process and NTCP binding is preceded by a low affinity attachment of the virus to cells via the carbohydrate side chain of heparin sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) [8]. Glypican 5 was identified as one of the HSPGs involved in this process [9]. We recently reported that lentiviral pseudotypes expressing HBV glycoproteins infect human hepatoma cells in an NTCP-dependent manner [10] supporting the model that NTCP envelop-protein interaction is sufficient to induce particle uptake and membrane fusion. Moreover, HBV infection of HepG2-NTCP cells is inhibited in a concentration-dependent manner by taurine and glycine conjugates of bile acids, the main substrates for NTCP [11–14], suggesting that bile acids and the HBV pre-S1 domain compete for NTCP binding. Indeed, a synthetic N-acylated pre-S1 lipopeptide that binds NTCP, Myrcludex B, inhibits HBV infection in vitro and in vivo [7, 11, 15–17]. Specific domains of human NTCP are essential for viral infection and exchange of the first extracellular loop of the human homolog (specifically amino acids 84–87) into the murine counterpart confers susceptibility to HBV/HDV infection [6]. However, detailed understanding on the structural requirements of viral docking to NTCP and the role of carbohydrate moieties in this process is lacking.
Human NTCP is a multi-pass transmembrane protein that comprises an extracellular N-terminus and cytoplasmic C-terminal domain [5]. The extracellular N-terminal domain encodes two N-glycosylation sites at residues N5 and N11 (Fig 1A) [5, 18] and we hypothesize that these glycosyl moieties regulate NTCP trafficking and localization at the plasma membrane. Carbohydrate moieties of glycoproteins play several roles, such as controlling protein folding, stabilizing protein conformation, intracellular and membrane trafficking and interaction with other proteins [19]. We therefore investigated the role of N-glycosylation on NTCP receptor activity for HBV and bile acid transporter function.
Results
N-glycosyl moieties of NTCP are required for HBV infection
Site-directed mutagenesis of a tagged NTCP open reading frame introduced single or double substitution of the exofacial Asn residues (N5 and N11) with glutamine, resulted in four constructs; NTCP-wild type (WT), NTCP-N5Q, NTCP-N11Q and NTCP-N5,11Q. Expression of WT and NTCP mutants in HepG2 hepatoma cells showed comparable levels of mRNA as determined by qPCR (Fig 1A).
We first examined the effect of N-glycosylation on HBV infection of NTCP expressing HepG2 cell lines. HBV establishes a covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) in the nucleus of infected cells that serves as the transcription template for all viral proteins including secreted hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg). Infection was assessed by quantifying cccDNA by qPCR and measuring HBeAg expression. HBV infection of HepG2 cells expressing WT or single glycan mutants, NTCP-N5Q and NTCP-N11Q, resulted in comparable levels of cccDNA and HBeAg expression (Fig 2). However, disruption of both glycosylation sites (NTCP-N5,11Q) prevented viral infection, both at a multiplicity of infection (MOI) of 100 (Fig 2), and 400 (data not shown). Since cells expressing NTCP with a single glycan located either at N5 or N11 support similar levels of infection as the WT transporter molecule, we conclude that a single glycan is required for HBV infection. Moreover, the location of this glycan is not critical since both N5 and N11 mutants support similar levels of viral infection.
Bile acid uptake affected by NTCP glycosylation pattern
Since HepG2 cells expressing the glycosylation deficient NTCP (NTCP-N5,11Q) variant failed to support HBV infection, we investigated the capacity of these cells to uptake bile acids. The single mutants, NTCP-N5Q and NTCP-N11Q, exhibited TCA transport activity comparable to NTCP-WT. However, NTCP-N5,11Q showed a minimal uptake (Fig 3), suggesting that NTCP lacking both N-glycosyl moieties is unable to transport bile acids. The reduced uptake capacity of NTCP-N5,11Q was also observed in Huh-7 cells (S1A Fig). Furthermore, the limited transport of bile acids by NTCP-N5,11Q was not due to the HA-tag since untagged NTCP-N5,11Q showed a similar phenotype (S1C–S1E Fig).
NTCP N-glycosylation profile
Since HBV infection and bile acid uptake was defective in HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-N5,11Q, we investigated the effect of this mutation on protein expression. NTCP-WT was detected as multiple bands with a molecular mass of 35-60kDa. HepG2 cells expressing NTCP carrying a single glycan moiety (N5Q or N11Q), displayed a band of 45kDa and NTCP-N5,11Q migrated around 35kDa (Fig 4A). To test whether the bands at 35-60kDa correspond to differences in N-glycosylation, samples were treated with PNGaseF, that cleaves N-glycan chains from glycoproteins. This procedure resulted in a near complete shift of NTCP signal towards +/- 35kDa (Fig 4B), demonstrating that the differences in molecular weight were due to the addition of N linked glycans on the protein. Since comparable protein amounts were loaded we conclude that the glycosylation-depleted NTCP variant shows a modest level of protein expression (Fig 4C). Furthermore, similar glycosylation patterns were observed in HepaRG and Huh7 cells (S1B Fig).
Glycosylation is essential for NTCP localization at the plasma membrane
Since HBV infection and bile acid uptake requires NTCP localization at the plasma membrane, we anticipated that N-glycosylation would influence NTCP expression at the plasma membrane. Cell surface biotinylation demonstrates that NTCP-WT, NTCP-N5Q, NTCP-N11Q but not NTCP-N5,11Q were detected in the plasma membrane fraction (Fig 5A). Notably, the minority pool of unglycosylated WT protein, migrating at ~35 kDa (Fig 4A) is also not expressed at the cell surface (Fig 5A). Transferrin receptor was used as loading control and similar expression levels were detected in all samples. These results were similar when NTCP cell surface abundance was measured with FITC-labeled Myrcludex B. Myrcludex B, a ligand based on the pre-S1 domain of HBV-L protein [7, 11, 15], binds NTCP at position 157–165, so at a certain distance from the glycosyl moieties. NTCP with a single glycan moiety showed a modest reduction in plasma membrane expression compared to NTCP-WT (Fig 5B). However, NTCP-N5,11Q showed a significant reduction in plasma membrane expression compared to NTCP-WT (Fig 5B). Altogether, this suggests that glycosylation-depleted NTCP, in contrast with NTCP-N5Q and NTCP-N11Q, is not efficiently expressed or targeted to the plasma membrane.
Since NTCP-N5,11Q showed only minimal plasma membrane expression, we tested whether this protein was retained in the cytoplasm. As shown in Fig 5C, HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-N5,11Q displayed a weak intracellular signal. The NTCP mutants with one glycan (NTCP-N5Q, NTCP-N11Q), in contrast, showed the same NTCP distribution as NTCP-WT.
Glycosylation-depleted NTCP is rapidly degraded in lysosomes
The low expression levels of NTCP N5,11Q may reflect an enhanced degradation of this variant. To investigate whether NTCP-N5,11Q was targeted to the proteasome or alternatively degraded in the lysosome, parental HepG2 cells and those stably expressing NTCP-WT or NTCP-N5,11Q. were treated with MG132, Bafilomycin or the combination of these two drugs. The proteasome inhibitor MG132 had no effect on NTCP-N5,11Q expression at the plasma membrane (Fig 6A) or bile acid uptake (Fig 6B and 6C). However, treatment with Bafilomycin to prevent degradation of internalized and lysosomally targeted proteins [20], induced an intracellular accumulation of NTCP (Fig 6A). The increased intracellular signal of NTCP-N5,11Q following Bafilomycin treatment either alone or in combination with MG132 was not accompanied by restoration of bile acid uptake activity (Fig 6C). Activity of NTCP-WT was not affected by Bafilomycin or MG132 (Fig 6C). In conclusion, NTCP-N5,11Q is rapidly endocytosed to be degraded in lysosomes.
Discussion
In the present study, we show that N-linked glycans on NTCP are required for protein expression, localization, bile acid uptake and NTCP-mediated HBV infection. NTCP binds the preS1 domain of the HBV encoded L protein with high-affinity, and its selective expression at the basolateral hepatocellular plasma membrane can explain both liver tropism and species specificity of HBV and HDV.
This study aimed to assess whether the glycosyl-moieties of NTCP itself contribute to virus infection. Strategies to modulate total cellular glycosylation, such as using tunicamycin would not be suitable to tackle specifically the contribution of NTCP-bound glycans to HBV infection. In NTCP, both N5 and N11 are used as glycan-attachments residues and mutating both amino acids abolished NTCP glycosylation. These amino acids are conserved across multiple species, including human, mouse, rat, macaca, pongo, and cow and in the related transporter Slc10a2/ASBT (S3 Table). The data presented here demonstrate that at least one glycan residue is sufficient for NTCP, plasma membrane localization, bile acid uptake and viral receptor activity. NTCP-N5,11Q is degraded via the lysosome. This could imply that the glycosylation-deficient NTCP might be first targeted to the plasma membrane, to be rapidly internalized and degraded. This model is supported by data showing a low level of bile acid uptake in HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-N5,11Q compared to parental cells. However, treatment with Bafolimycin to inhibit lysosomal degradation did not enhance plasma membrane abundance of the glycosylation-deficient NTCP, nor bile acid uptake. For several other integral membrane proteins, N-glycosylation is associated with decreased protein stability and absence of glycosyl moieties can promote degradative pathways [21–23]. Interestingly, multiple transporters that lack their normal glycosylation, degradation occurs via the proteosomal route, in line with ER-assisted degradation and impaired trafficking to the plasma membrane [23, 24]. For NTCP the degradation occurs via a lysosomal fashion, suggesting a post-ER sensing of altered NTCP conformation and degradation after entering the endosomal pathway. The small but significant bile acid uptake seen for NTCP-N5,11Q is in line with (partial) plasma membrane targeting. The significant uptake of taurocholate that can be detected even while plasma membrane abundance is minimal also implicates that the NTCP N5,11Q protein is functional. This is similar to some other glycoproteins with a transporter function, for example ASCT2, where only membrane trafficking and not the transport function is affected when glycosylation sites are mutated [22]. In contrast, for other transporters, for example PEPT1 N-linked glycosylation does not affect plasma membrane abundance in Xenopus laevis oocytes, but transport kinetics are lower in the unglycosylated mutant [25].
We did not observe any evidence of HBV infection of HepG2 cells expressing NTCP-N5,11Q. This could suggest that i) viral entry requires a certain NTCP density at the cell surface, ii) NTCP needs to remain at the plasma membrane sufficiently long to allow efficient virus docking, or iii) the lysosomal degradation of NTCP is not compatible with its role in the viral life cycle. Since NTCP-N5,11Q was not detected at the plasma membrane by cell surface biotinylation, we conclude that glycosylation plays an important role in NTCP trafficking. This phenotype makes it impossible to reliably assess the contribution of the NTCP glycan moieties on viral binding per se to the receptor. However, we can conclude that one glycan residue is sufficient for bile acid uptake as well as efficient HBV entry. Furthermore, we established that glycosylation of NTCP, at least one glycan residue, is required for NTCP localization at the plasma membrane and subsequent bile acid uptake.
Methods
Chemicals and reagents
Hygromycin (merckmillipore), anti-HA HRP (sigma), 3HTaurocholate (Perkin Elmer), Taurocholate (Sigma), MG132 (Z-Leu-Leu-Leu-al) (sigma), Bafilomycin A1 (sigma), DMSO (VWR), Myrcludex B-FITC (Pepscan), Transferrin receptor (Invitrogen), anti-mouse-HRP(DAKO).
NTCP glycosylation mutants
Aspargine to glutamine mutations in NTCP constructs [26] were generated using the QuikChange® Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies). NTCP open reading frames were cloned into the vector pLenti-PGK-Hygro-DEST (Addgene) using the Gateway LR clonase II enzyme mix (Invitrogen) after initial cloning into pENTR-D-TOPO according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Life Technologies). All constructs were sequenced to verify they contained the correct mutation. Primers used to generate the constructs can be found in S1 Table.
Cell culture
Human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2, from ATCC, VA, USA) and human embryonic kidney (HEK293T, from ATCC) cells were cultured in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% penicillin/streptomycin and, 1% Glutamine. Cells were grown at 37°C in a humidified incubator at a 5% CO2 atmosphere.
Stable cell-line
HEK293T cells were seeded in 10cm2 plates, 24h before transfection with 3rd generation virus plasmids, PMD2G, PMDL and PRSV vectors and one of the NTCP constructs. Medium of the HEK293T cells was harvested and added to HepG2 cells for 6 hours followed by refreshing of the medium. After 48h, the infected HepG2 cells were selected using Hygromycin (50 μg/ml).
Determination of HBV infection
HepG2 cells were seeded onto collagen-coated plates (6x105 cells/well) and after 3 days of differentiation using 2.5% DMSO infected with HBV (MOI = 100) overnight. Infection was proven by establishment of nuclear cccDNA and HBeAg secretion. HBeAg was detected in the culture medium using a commercial immunoassay (Siemens Molecular Diagnostics, Marburg, Germany). Total DNA was extracted from infected cells 3 days post infection (PI) using a NucleoSpin tissue kit (Macherey Nagel, Düren, Germany) and subsequently treated with T5 exonuclease (10U/μl) for 10 min before cccDNA detection. HBV cccDNA was detected by real time PCR (qPCR) with selective PCR primers as previously described [27, 28]. qPCR was performed on the LightCycler 480 real time PCR 96-well system II (Roche, 5015278001) and analysed using the second derivative maximum approach that takes normalisation to a reference gene (PrP) and primer efficiency into account.
Immunofluorescence NTCP
HepG2 cells were seeded onto coverslip and cultured using standard culturing conditions until 60–70% confluence. 72h after seeding, cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde/PBS for 20 min and permeabilized for 2 min with 0.2% Triton X-100/PBS at room temperature. After rinsing with PBS, nonspecific binding of antibodies was blocked by 2%(w/v) bovine serum albumin in PBS for 30 minutes at room temperature. Cells were incubated with mouse anti-HA (H9658, Sigma) for 2 hours followed by Alexa Fluor™ 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG (Invitrogen) for 45 minutes. Cover slips were washed three times with PBS and Hoechst staining was performed afterwards. Cells were mounted with mowiol. Images were obtained using a confocal laser scanning microscope (TCA SP8 X LEICA) equipped with HC Plan Apochromat 63X NA 1,4 oil CS2.
Taurocholate uptake assay
HepG2 cells were seeded into 24-well plates and cultured using standard culturing conditions until they reached 80% confluence. Cells were rinsed twice with warm uptake buffer [5 mM KCl, 1.1 mM KH2PO4, 1 mM MgCl2, 1.8 mM CaCl2, 10 mM D-glucose, 10 mM Hepes and 136 mM NaCl]. After which, cells were incubated at 37°C with uptake buffer containing 20μM taurocholate supplemented with 0,25μC [3H]taurocholate for 2 min. Subsequently, cells were washed four times with ice-cold PBS and lysed in 0.05% SDS. Accumulation of radiolabelled substrates was determined by scintillation counting.
Immunoblotting
Proteins were separated on a 10% polyacrylamide gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. Unspecific binding was blocked with 5% milk in 0.1% TBS-TWEEN (TBST) for 1h at room temperature. Antibodies for either NTCP (visualized with HA-HRP) or transferrin receptor (TfR) were added to 5% milk-TBST and incubated with the membrane for 16h at 4°C while rocking. After three washes with TBST, membranes were incubated with a HRP (horseradish peroxidase)-conjugated mouse antibodies (Sigma) to visualize the TfR as described previously [26]. Following three washes in TBST, ECL was performed, and proteins were detected by chemiluminescence.
Immunoprecipitation
Cells were grown in a 100mm culture plates to 80% confluence. After washing with PBS, cells were lysed in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris PH 7,4, 5 mM EDTA, 10% (w/v) sucrose, 1% Nonidet P40) supplemented with protein inhibitors. Subsequently, BCA assay according to manufactory protocol was performed and equal protein amounts were incubated with monoclonal anti-HA antibody (Sigma 9568) immobilized on Protein A—agarose beads (Sigma) for 16h at 4°C. Samples were analyzed by immunoblotting using anti-HA antibodies (Sigma) and HRP-conjugated mouse antibodies (Sigma) as described above.
PNGaseF treatment
NTCP was immunoprecipitated from stably transduced HepG2 cells using monoclonal anti-HA antibody immobilized on Protein A-agarose beads as described above. After addition of sample buffer (2% (w/v) SDS, 10% v/v glycerol 40mM Tris pH6.8, Bromophenol blue (Sigma Alrich) containing 0.1M DTT (Promega), supernatant was taken and samples were treated with PNGase F (peptide N-glycosidase F) according to the manufacturer's instructions (New England Biolabs).
Cell surface biotinylation assay
Cells were grown in a 100mm culture plates to 80% confluence. After washing with PBS-CM (PBS containing 1mM MgCl2, 0.5mM CaCl2, pH 8.0), 0,5mg/ml NHS-ss-Biotin/PBS-CM was added for 30min at 4°C. After quenching with PBS-CM containing 0.1% BSA, cells were washed three times with PBS-CM and lysed in lysis buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris PH 7,4, 5 mM EDTA, 10% (w/v) sucrose, 1% Nonidet P40) supplemented with protein inhibitors. Lysate was centrifuged and supernatant was added to pre-washed neutravidin beads. Pull down was performed for 2 hours followed by washing with lysis buffer. The proteins were eluted in sample buffer and subjected to immunoblotting as described above.
Lysosomal versus proteosomal degradation
Cells were plated for either TCA assay or immunofluorescence as described above. 48 or 66 hours after seeding, treatment with either DMSO, 10nM Bafilomycin (24h) or 20μM MG132 (6h) or a combination of the last two was performed. After treatment, cells were analyzed following the above described protocols.
NTCP plasma membrane expression
Cells were seeded into 96 wells plate (Corning; 734–1609) three days before staining. Cells were stained with 0.02μM Myrcludex-B—FITC for 30min at 37°C. Myrcludex B-Fitc intensity was measured using a NOVOstar microplate reader (BMG Labtech GmbH, Offenburg) at λex / λem = 483–14 nm/ 530–30 nm. The option orbital averaging was set at a diameter of 3mm. Background fluorescence was subtracted and results were plotted as percentage of NTCP WT.
mRNA expression of NTCP
Cells were seeded in a 6 wells format, three days before RNA extraction. Total RNA was extracted with TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Bleiswijk, The Netherlands). Complementary DNA was synthesized from DNAse-treated total RNA with Oligo-dT12-18 and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen). Quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) was carried out in a Roche Lightcycler 480 II instrument using SYBR green (Roche) and the hNTCP primers listed in S2 Table. Expression level in each sample was normalized to reference gene H36B4.
Statistical analysis
Values are expressed as mean ± sd. Significant analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variances following the Bonferroni’s multiple comparison test. Graphpad Prism software was used for analysis.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Jane van Heteren and Marion Robin for help with the cloning and optimization of compound dosing.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
SFJvdG is supported by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (VIDI 91713319) and the European Research Council (Starting grant 337479). Research in the McKeating laboratory is funded by the MRC, EU FP7 PathCO and H2020 grant Hep-CAR. Research in the Protzer laboratory was funded by the H2020 grant Hep-CAR and by the German research Foundation (DFG; TRR179). AC and collaborative work between McKeating and Protzer laboratories is funded by the Institute for Advanced Study with the support of the Technische Universitat Munchen via the German Excellence Initiative and EU 7th Framework Programme under grant agreement number 291763.
References
- 1.Craddock AL, Love MW, Daniel RW, Kirby LC, Walters HC, Wong MH, et al. Expression and transport properties of the human ileal and renal sodium-dependent bile acid transporter. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(1 Pt 1):G157–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sun AQ, Swaby I, Xu S, Suchy FJ. Cell-specific basolateral membrane sorting of the human liver Na+-dependent bile acid cotransporter. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280(6):G1305–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Vaz FM, Paulusma CC, Huidekoper H, de Ru M, Lim C, Koster J, et al. Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (SLC10A1) deficiency: conjugated hypercholanemia without a clear clinical phenotype. Hepatology. 2015;61(1):260–7. 10.1002/hep.27240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Slijepcevic D, Kaufman C, Wichers CG, Gilglioni EH, Lempp FA, Duijst S, et al. Impaired uptake of conjugated bile acids and hepatitis b virus pres1-binding in na -taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide knockout mice. Hepatology. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hagenbuch B, Meier PJ. Molecular cloning, chromosomal localization, and functional characterization of a human liver Na+/bile acid cotransporter. J Clin Invest. 1994;93(3):1326–31. 10.1172/JCI117091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Yan H, Zhong G, Xu G, He W, Jing Z, Gao Z, et al. Sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide is a functional receptor for human hepatitis B and D virus. Elife. 2012;1:e00049 10.7554/eLife.00049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Urban S, Bartenschlager R, Kubitz R, Zoulim F. Strategies to inhibit entry of HBV and HDV into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2014;147(1):48–64. 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.04.030 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schulze A, Gripon P, Urban S. Hepatitis B virus infection initiates with a large surface protein-dependent binding to heparan sulfate proteoglycans. Hepatology. 2007;46(6):1759–68. 10.1002/hep.21896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Verrier ER, Colpitts CC, Bach C, Heydmann L, Weiss A, Renaud M, et al. A targeted functional RNA interference screen uncovers glypican 5 as an entry factor for hepatitis B and D viruses. Hepatology. 2016;63(1):35–48. 10.1002/hep.28013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Meredith LW, Hu K, Cheng X, Howard CR, Baumert TF, Balfe P, et al. Lentiviral hepatitis B pseudotype entry requires sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide and additional hepatocyte-specific factors. J Gen Virol. 2016;97(1):121–7. 10.1099/jgv.0.000317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Ni Y, Lempp FA, Mehrle S, Nkongolo S, Kaufman C, Falth M, et al. Hepatitis B and D viruses exploit sodium taurocholate co-transporting polypeptide for species-specific entry into hepatocytes. Gastroenterology. 2014;146(4):1070–83. 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.12.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Veloso Alves Pereira I, Buchmann B, Sandmann L, Sprinzl K, Schlaphoff V, Dohner K, et al. Primary biliary acids inhibit hepatitis D virus (HDV) entry into human hepatoma cells expressing the sodium-taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP). PLoS One. 2015;10(2):e0117152 10.1371/journal.pone.0117152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yan H, Peng B, Liu Y, Xu G, He W, Ren B, et al. Viral entry of hepatitis B and D viruses and bile salts transportation share common molecular determinants on sodium taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide. J Virol. 2014;88(6):3273–84. 10.1128/JVI.03478-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Konig A, Doring B, Mohr C, Geipel A, Geyer J, Glebe D. Kinetics of the bile acid transporter and hepatitis B virus receptor Na+/taurocholate cotransporting polypeptide (NTCP) in hepatocytes. J Hepatol. 2014;61(4):867–75. 10.1016/j.jhep.2014.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Petersen J, Dandri M, Mier W, Lutgehetmann M, Volz T, von Weizsacker F, et al. Prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in vivo by entry inhibitors derived from the large envelope protein. Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(3):335–41. 10.1038/nbt1389 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Blank A, Markert C, Hohmann N, Carls A, Mikus G, Lehr T, et al. First-in-human application of the novel hepatitis B and hepatitis D virus entry inhibitor myrcludex B. J Hepatol. 2016;65(3):483–9. 10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Volz T, Allweiss L, Ben MM, Warlich M, Lohse AW, Pollok JM, et al. The entry inhibitor Myrcludex-B efficiently blocks intrahepatic virus spreading in humanized mice previously infected with hepatitis B virus. J Hepatol. 2013;58(5):861–7. 10.1016/j.jhep.2012.12.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hallen S, Mareninova O, Branden M, Sachs G. Organization of the membrane domain of the human liver sodium/bile acid cotransporter. Biochemistry. 2002;41(23):7253–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lis H, Sharon N. Protein glycosylation. Structural and functional aspects. Eur J Biochem. 1993;218(1):1–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Yoshimori T, Yamamoto A, Moriyama Y, Futai M, Tashiro Y. Bafilomycin A1, a specific inhibitor of vacuolar-type H+-ATPase, inhibits acidification and protein degradation in lysosomes of cultured cells. J Biol Chem. 1991;266(26):17707–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Christiansen MN, Chik J, Lee L, Anugraham M, Abrahams JL, Packer NH. Cell surface protein glycosylation in cancer. Proteomics. 2014;14(4–5):525–46. 10.1002/pmic.201300387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Console L, Scalise M, Tarmakova Z, Coe IR, Indiveri C. N-linked glycosylation of human SLC1A5 (ASCT2) transporter is critical for trafficking to membrane. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2015;1853(7):1636–45. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2015.03.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Beers MF, Zhao M, Tomer Y, Russo SJ, Zhang P, Gonzales LW, et al. Disruption of N-linked glycosylation promotes proteasomal degradation of the human ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCA3. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2013;305(12):L970–80. 10.1152/ajplung.00184.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhao N, Zhang AS, Worthen C, Knutson MD, Enns CA. An iron-regulated and glycosylation-dependent proteasomal degradation pathway for the plasma membrane metal transporter ZIP14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(25):9175–80. 10.1073/pnas.1405355111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Stelzl T, Baranov T, Geillinger KE, Kottra G, Daniel H. Effect of N-glycosylation on the transport activity of the peptide transporter PEPT1. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2016;310(2):G128–41. 10.1152/ajpgi.00350.2015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bijsmans IT, Bouwmeester RA, Geyer J, Faber KN, van de Graaf SF. Homo- and hetero-dimeric architecture of the human liver Na+-dependent taurocholate co-transporting protein. Biochem J. 2012;441(3):1007–15. 10.1042/BJ20111234 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jost S, Turelli P, Mangeat B, Protzer U, Trono D. Induction of antiviral cytidine deaminases does not explain the inhibition of hepatitis B virus replication by interferons. J Virol. 2007;81(19):10588–96. 10.1128/JVI.02489-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Protzer U, Seyfried S, Quasdorff M, Sass G, Svorcova M, Webb D, et al. Antiviral activity and hepatoprotection by heme oxygenase-1 in hepatitis B virus infection. Gastroenterology. 2007;133(4):1156–65. 10.1053/j.gastro.2007.07.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.