Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Adolesc Health. 2016 Dec 6;60(2):226–228. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.025

Adolescent cigarette-smoking perceptions and behavior: Tobacco control gains and gaps amidst the rapidly expanding tobacco products market from 2001 to 2015

Karma McKelvey 1, Bonnie Halpern-Felsher 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC5270372  NIHMSID: NIHMS823000  PMID: 27939880

Abstract

Objectives

Determine whether adolescents’ intentions to smoke, cigarette-smoking behavior, and specific perceptions of cigarette-smoking are different in 2015 versus 2001.

Methods

Data from two California school-based studies (xage=14) were compared: one conducted in 2001–2002 (“2001”), N=395; the second in 2014–2015 (“2015”); N=282.

Results

In 2015 more participants reported it was very unlikely they would smoke (94% vs. 65%) and never-smoked (95% vs. 74%); they reported perceiving less likelihood of looking more mature (17% vs. 28%) and greater likelihood of getting into trouble (86% vs. 77%), having a heart attack (76% vs. 69%), and contracting lung cancer (85% vs. 78%) from smoking (p’s < .001). Perceptions of short-term health problems and addiction were similar in 2001 and 2015

Conclusions

Findings suggest that adolescents in 2015 perceived greater risks compared to 2001 even amidst the rapidly changing tobacco product landscape. In addition to continuing messages of long-term health risks, prevention efforts should include messages about addiction and short-term health and social risks.

Keywords: adolescents/youth, cigarettes, public health, risk perceptions, social norms, perceived addiction, tobacco control

INTRODUCTION

Adolescent cigarette use decreased significantly from 2001 to 2015,1 due largely to smoke-free policies and public health campaigns aimed at increasing knowledge, heightening perceptions of smoking risks and changing social norms.2 Given the link between smoking-related perceptions, social norms, and cigarette initiation3 one can hypothesize that tobacco control efforts would have increased perceived risks and decreased perceived acceptability. However, the recent proliferation of novel tobacco products such as electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) has public health professionals and tobacco control advocates fearing a “renormalization” of smoking that could erode decades of tobacco-control gains.4 Indeed, adolescents hold favorable attitudes towards e-cigarettes and believe they are a healthier alternative to cigarettes.5 It could thus be hypothesized that adolescents hold more favorable views of cigarettes, compared to in 2001.

These competing hypotheses question if and how specific cigarette-related perceptions differ between adolescents in 2015 and 2001. Knowing which adolescent smoking-related perceptions have changed is timely and important, and will inform health education messaging aimed at preventing adolescent tobacco use.2 We aimed to determine whether adolescents’ specific cigarette-related perceptions of risks, benefits, and social norms; intentions to smoke cigarettes; and smoking behavior differed between 2015 and 2001.

METHODS

Participants and procedure

A convenience sample of large high schools with a stable and diverse student population was recruited; over 50% of invited schools agreed to participate. Sample size allowed sufficient power (80%) to detect the contrasts of interest in both 2001 and 2015. Participants in 2001–2002 (“2001”) were recruited from 9th grade in two Northern California high schools (N=395; 53% female; 48% white; Xage 14, SD = 0.4); they completed the survey during class.3 Participants in 2014–2015 (“2015”) were recruited from classes in 10 other high schools throughout California (N=282; 60% female; 36% white; Xage 14.1, SD = 1.6); they completed the survey online, via Qualtrics.5 Surveys contained nearly identical detailed measures of smoking perceptions, intentions to use, and ever-use of cigarettes, as described below.3,3,5

Measures

The measures used in this study have been used in past studies; and reliability and predictive validity of these measures have been assessed.5,6,6

Ever-smoked

Participants indicated how many times they had ever, in their entire life, smoked a cigarette, even one or two puffs.

Behavioral intentions

Participants indicated how likely they were to initiate smoking in the next 6 months, from “definitely will” to “definitely will not.”

Social norms

Participants were asked out of 100 teens their age, about how many they think had tried smoking a cigarette?

Perceptions

Participants read the following text: Whether or not you have used any of these products, imagine that you JUST BEGAN USING cigarettes. You use it about 2 to 3 times a day, every day. Sometimes you use it alone and sometimes you use it with friends. If you use cigarettes 2 to 3 times each day, what is the chance that… followed by several social and health short-term and long-term risks and benefits (see Table 1). Participants were asked to gauge the likelihood of experiencing each outcome from 0–100% given the above scenario.

Table 1.

Sample demographics and differences in perceived social norms, long- and short-term risks/benefits, behavioral intentions, and behavior related to cigarette smoking among California 9th graders

DEMOGRAPHICS (n, %) 2001 (N = 395) 2015 (N = 282) p value*
Age, Mean (SD) 14.0 (0.4) 14.1 (1.6) 0.49
Female 211 (53) 169 (60) 0.09
Maternal education level (college degree or higher) 183 (48) 118 (42) 0.24
Race/ethnicity
 White 189 (51) 78 (28) 0.00
 Asian 67 (18) 79 (28) 0.00
 Hispanic 58 (16) 79 (28) 0.00
BEHAVIOR (n, %)
Never smoked a cigarette, not even a puff or two 292 (74) 265 (95) 0.00
BEHAVIORAL INTENTION (n, %)
Very unlikely to try cigarettes in the next 6 months 251 (65) 263 (94) 0.00
PERCEPTIONS, mean
Social norms
Of 100 teens your age, how many do you think have tried smoking? 45 34 0.00
Benefits*
You will look more grown up (2001)/mature (2015)? 28 17 0.00
You will feel relaxed after smoking? 42 37 0.05
You will look cool? 15 17 0.46
You will be more popular? 14 14 0.82
You will be thinner? 50 44 0.04
Social risks*
You will get into trouble? 77 86 0.00
Your friends will be upset with you? 80 79 0.76
You will have bad breath? 88 90 0.41
Long-term health risks*
You will have a heart attack? 69 76 0.00
You will get lung cancer? 78 85 0.00
You will get wrinkles on your face? 82 84 0.32
Addiction*
You can quit smoking cigarettes if you want to? 43 35 0.01
You will become addicted to cigarettes? 77 79 0.48
You will still be smoking cigarettes in 5 years? 64 65 0.78
Short-term health risks*
You will have a lot of trouble catching your breath? 76 77 0.53
You will have many really bad colds? 57 57 0.87
You will get a bad cough from smoking? 76 76 0.72
*

Bonferroni corrected (p.003) bold indicates significant difference

Analyses

Sample means were compared using independent samples t-tests; chi-square test for significance was used to test differences in proportion. Unless noted, all reported differences are significant at α ≤ 0.003 pursuant to Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons. Analyses were conducted using SPSS 23 or Epi Info 7.

RESULTS

Samples differed by ethnicity, but not by age, sex, or SES (maternal education). Intraclass correlations revealed no difference in ever-smoking by school (both overall and by year). Fewer participants in 2015 (vs. 2001) reported ever-smoking (by gender: 5% vs. 25% girls; 6% vs. 28% boys), and more participants in 2015 reported it was “very unlikely” they would try smoking in the next 6 months (95% girls and 93% boys vs. 65% for both). Compared to 2001, participants in 2015 perceived lower smoking prevalence among peers (49% vs. 39% girls; 40% vs. 27% boys); less likelihood of experiencing the benefit of looking more mature or grown-up; greater likelihood of getting in trouble, having a heart attack, and developing lung cancer; and similar likelihood of experiencing most short-term benefits and health problems, becoming addicted, and still smoking in 5 years (Table 1). In 2001 gender differences were found in perceived likelihood of friends being upset with them (85% girls vs. 74% boys) and of getting into trouble for smoking (81% vs. 73%).

DISCUSSION

Compared to 2001, fewer participants in 2015 had ever-smoked or intended to smoke. They perceived less likelihood of looking more mature or grown-up; less social acceptability of smoking; and greater likelihood of experiencing long-term health problems. These findings provide support for the hypothesis that amidst tobacco control efforts and health messaging of the past 15 years, adolescents would hold less favorable attitudes towards cigarettes. Efforts have included: (1) clean indoor air legislation and smoke-free policies;2 (2) increased numbers of adults trying to quit smoking, reinforcing perceptions of smoking-unacceptability;7 (3) the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Control Act, which resulted in renewed tobacco control efforts;8 and (4) public health programming such as CDC’s Tips from Former Smokers that warned of smoking-related hazards and the addictive nature of nicotine.9

Our findings do not support the hypothesis that due to rapidly increasing e-cigarette use among adolescents, perceptions of cigarettes have become more favorable.4 However, given that adolescents hold more favorable attitudes towards e-cigarettes,5 are using e-cigarettes at high rates, are more likely to use cigarettes if they used e-cigarettes,10 and that e-cigarettes are largely unregulated, it is possible that cigarette-smoking perceptions could reverse and lead to increases in adolescent cigarette-smoking.

Perceptions of short-term harm and addiction were unchanged, illuminating areas for improved messaging to prevent both cigarette and e-cigarette uptake. Such health messages are critical given the relationship between perceptions and tobacco use3 and that nicotine addiction is not well understood.11

Both studies were conducted in California; results may not be generalizable throughout the United States or internationally. Nevertheless, this study uses data collected with nearly identical surveys from similar samples, 14-years apart, to report changes in specific cigarette-smoking perceptions amidst a rapidly changing tobacco product landscape. Though samples differed in ethnic distribution, post-hoc analysis revealed no difference in outcomes when controlling for ethnicity. Perceptions most changed correlated with the strongest and most common tobacco-control messages. Such perceptions, shown to be modifiable and to result in sustained change of cigarette-smoking perceptions, should continue to be targeted with expanded messages that include e-cigarettes. To better explain trends in perceptions and more succinctly relate them to tobacco control efforts or public health programming, shorter intervals between measurements are needed.

IMPLICATIONS.

More cigarette-related risk and less social acceptability were reported in a sample of 9th graders in 2015 compared to a sample of 9th graders in 2001. Perceptions that changed most correlated with the strongest, most common tobacco-control messages. Tobacco control efforts should continue targeting cigarette-smoking perceptions shown to result in sustained change with broad-based prevention programs including e-cigarettes.

Acknowledgments

Authors express gratitude to the students and schools without whose cooperation and participation this work would not be possible.

Funding: Research reported in this paper was supported by grant number 1P50CA180890 from the National Cancer Institute and Food and Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products and grant number 9KT-0072 from the Tobacco Related Disease Research Program. Dr. McKelvey was supported by grant number R25 CA113710 from the NIH/NCI. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH or the Food and Drug Administration.

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final citable form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Declaration of Interests: KM and BHF have no competing interests.

References

  • 1.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2015. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. 2015;65(1):5–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.21254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Farrelly MC, Loomis BR, Han B, et al. A comprehensive examination of the influence of state tobacco control programs and policies on youth smoking. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(3):549–555. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300948. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Song AV, Morrell HER, Cornell JL, et al. Perceptions of smoking-related risks and benefits as predictors of adolescent smoking initiation. Am J Public Health. 2009;99(3):487–492. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.137679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Cobb NK, Byron MJ, Abrams DB, Shields PG. Novel nicotine delivery systems and public health: The rise of the “e-cigarette”. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(12):2340–2342. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2010.199281. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Roditis M, Delucchi K, Cash D, Halpern-Felsher B. Adolescents’ perceptions of health risks, social risks, and benefits differ across tobacco products. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2016;58(5):558–566. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.01.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chaffee BW, Gansky SA, Halpern-Felsher B, Couch ET, Essex G, Walsh MM. Conditional risk assessment of adolescents’ electronic cigarette perceptions. Am J Health Behav. 2015;39(3):421–432. doi: 10.5993/AJHB.39.3.14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Albers AB, PhD, Biener L, PhD, Siegel Michael, MD, MPH, Cheng DM, ScD, Rigotti N,MD. Household smoking bans and adolescent antismoking attitudes and smoking initiation: Findings from a longitudinal study of a massachusetts youth cohort. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(10):1886–93. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.129320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Deyton L, Sharfstein J, Hamburg M. Tobacco product regulation—a public health approach. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(19):1753–1756. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1004152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao X, Cai X. Exposure to the tips from former smokers campaign among adolescents in the united states. Nicotine Tob Res. 2016;18(5):971–975. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntv265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Wills TA, Knight R, Sargent JD, Gibbons FX, Pagano I, Williams RJ. Longitudinal study of e-cigarette use and onset of cigarette smoking among high school students in hawaii. Tob Control. 2016 doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2015-052705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roditis M, Lee J, Halpern-Felsher BL. Adolescent (mis)perceptions about nicotine addiction: Results from a mixed-methods study. Health Educ Behav. 2016;43(2):156–164. doi: 10.1177/1090198115598985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES