Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2017 Jan 27;12(1):e0170610. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0170610

Whole-Genome Phylogenetic Analysis of Influenza B/Phuket/3073/2013-Like Viruses and Unique Reassortants Detected in Malaysia between 2012 and 2014

Xiang Yong Oong 1,#, Kim Tien Ng 1,#, Joon Ling Tan 2, Kok Gan Chan 3, Adeeba Kamarulzaman 1, Yoke Fun Chan 2, I-Ching Sam 2, Kok Keng Tee 2,*
Editor: Yury E Khudyakov4
PMCID: PMC5271328  PMID: 28129386

Abstract

Reassortment of genetic segments between and within influenza B lineages (Victoria and Yamagata) has been shown to generate novel reassortants with unique genetic characteristics. Based on hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA) genes, recent surveillance study has identified reassortment properties in B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus, which is currently used in the WHO-recommended influenza vaccine. To understand the potential reassortment patterns for all gene segments, four B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and two unique reassortants (one each from Yamagata and Victoria) detected in Malaysia from 2012–2014 were subjected to whole-genome sequencing. Each gene was phylogenetically classified into lineages, clades and sub-clades. Three B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses from Yamagata lineage were found to be intra-clade reassortants, possessing PA and NA genes derived from Stockholm/12-like sub-clade, while the remaining genes from Wisconsin/01-like sub-clade (both sub-clades were within Yamagata Clade 3/Yam-3). However, the other B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus had NS gene that derived from Stockholm/12-like sub-clade instead of Wisconsin/01-like sub-clade. One inter-clade reassortant had Yamagata Clade 2/Yam-2-derived HA and NP, and its remaining genes were Yam-3-derived. Within Victoria Clade 1/Vic-1 in Victoria lineage, one virus had intra-clade reassortment properties: HA and PB2 from Vic-1B sub-clade, MP and NS from a unique sub-clade “Vic-1C”, and the remaining genes from Vic-1A sub-clade. Although random reassortment event may generate unique reassortants, detailed phylogenetic classification of gene segments showed possible genetic linkage between PA and NA genes in B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses, which requires further investigation. Understanding on reassortment patterns in influenza B evolution may contribute to future vaccine design.

Introduction

Influenza B is a member of the Orthomyxoviridae family and has an enveloped structure and segmented negative sense RNA genome [1], and is an important cause of respiratory infections in humans globally. The genome organization of influenza B virus is similar to that of influenza A virus, which consists of eight segments: polymerase basic-1 (PB1), polymerase basic-2 (PB2), polymerase acidic (PA), hemagglutinin (HA), nucleoprotein (NP), neuraminidase (NA), matrix protein (MP), and non-structural protein (NS) [1]. First isolated in 1940 during an epidemic in the USA [2], influenza B viruses have been detected in different geographical regions worldwide [3]. In the 1980s, two antigenically and genetically distinct lineages, B/Victoria/2/1987-like (Victoria lineage) and B/Yamagata/16/88-like (Yamagata lineage), have co-circulated in the human population, based on analysis of the HA gene [4].

Segment reassortment between Victoria and Yamagata lineages based on phylogenetic analysis of the HA and NA genes has been reported since 1999 [5] as a result of unrestricted lineage mixing [6]. An extensive analysis of the whole genome of influenza B viruses in previous studies showed that frequent and complex reassortment of all eight gene segments between and within Victoria and Yamagata lineages continues to play a role in determining the evolutionary changes in both lineages [79]. As evident in our recent cross-sectional molecular epidemiological study of influenza B virus, conducted among patients who presented with acute upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) between 2012 and 2014 in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia [10], it was suggested that the emergence of B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses circulating in this country and globally was due to an intra-clade reassortment event within Yamagata Clade 3 (Yam-3), one of the WHO genetic groups within Yamagata lineage [11, 12]. This resulted in the selection of B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus as a candidate vaccine strain by the WHO for both northern and southern hemispheres for the 2015–2016 influenza season [11, 12].

Previously, the phylogeny of HA and NA genes that we determined allows grouping of influenza B viruses into lineages, WHO genetic groupings (clades) and sub-clades [10], and this permits more detailed classification of inter-clade or intra-clade reassortants. However, these groupings were not extended to other gene segments of the influenza B genome. Most whole-genome studies on influenza B viruses only described reassortment patterns of gene segments between lineages (or at the lineage level) [7, 1318] and have not described reassortment patterns at the clade and sub-clade levels. The evidence for segment reassortment within a lineage or clade in contributing to worldwide disease certainly warrants a more detailed and systematic approach of phylogenetic classification of all gene segments [10]. Hence, in this study, we aimed to examine the reassortment patterns at the lineage, clade and sub-clade levels by performing phylogenetic analysis on the whole genome of influenza B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants detected in Malaysia.

Materials and Methods

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the University of Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC) Medical Ethics Committee (MEC890.1). Standard, multilingual consent forms were used and written consent was obtained from all prospectively-recruited study participants. Written consent was also obtained from the next of kin, caretakers, or guardians on behalf of the minors/children enrolled in this study.

Sample collection and detection of influenza B viruses

A total of 3,935 nasopharyngeal swab samples were prospectively collected from children and adult outpatients at the Primary Care Clinic of UMMC in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia between 2012 and 2014 [10]. All patients experienced symptoms of acute URTI. These were tested for influenza B with the xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) FAST multiplex RT-PCR assay (Abbott Molecular, Toronto, Canada) used with the Universal Tag sorting system on a Luminex 200 IS platform (Luminex Corp., Austin, Texas, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol [19]. In addition, 59 influenza B isolates from children (1 month to 15 years old) who were admitted to the hospital between January 2009 and June 2015 were also included in this study. They were obtained from the stocked cultures of the diagnostic virology laboratory of UMMC. These influenza B viruses had been cultured from nasopharyngeal aspirates in Madin-Darby canine kidney (ATCC number CCL-34) cells and confirmed by immunofluorescence assay with the Light Diagnostic Respiratory Panel 1 Viral Screening & Identification Kit (Millipore, Billerica, USA).

Whole-genome sequencing of influenza B viruses

Using viral RNA extracted by NucliSENS easyMAG automated nucleic acid extraction system (bioMérieux, Marcy I’Etoile, France) [20] as template, all gene segments (PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NP, NA, MP and NS) of selected samples with unique HA-NA reassortment properties were amplified by two-step reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using reagents and cycling conditions [21] listed in S1 Table. Sequences of universal primer and primer sets for all eight gene segments are listed in S2 Table. Sequencing of PCR products was performed in an ABI PRISM 3730XL Genetic Analyzer using the BigDye Terminator v3.1 cycle sequencing kit chemistry (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). Lastly, sequence reads were assembled into a contig and manually edited using BioEdit 7.2 to produce a final sequence of full-length protein-coding region of each gene segment. All sequences generated in this study are available in GenBank under accession numbers KX269900-KX270009.

Phylogenetic analysis

In order to investigate the reassortment pattern among the selected Malaysian influenza B reassortants, phylogenetic analysis was conducted on all eight gene segments. All Malaysian sequences were first aligned with WHO recommended candidate vaccine and reference sequences, as well as selected strains from other countries retrieved from the NCBI Influenza Virus Resource [22] and the Global Initiative on Sharing all Influenza Data (GISAID) database [23] (accessed on January 14, 2016) (Table 1) using a web-based multiple sequence alignment program MAFFT [24]. Phylogenetic tree reconstructions of all genes were performed using maximum likelihood (ML) method heuristically inferred using subtree pruning and regrafting and nearest neighbor interchange algorithms with general time-reversible (GTR) nucleotide substitution model, a proportion of invariant sites (+I) and four categories of gamma rate heterogeneity (+Γ4), implemented in PAUP version 4.0 [25]. Robustness of the branching orders was evaluated by bootstrap analysis.

Table 1. Accession numbers of influenza B sequences in NCBI Influenza Virus Resource and GISAID used for the phylogenetic reconstruction of PB1, PB2, PA, HA, NP, NA, MP and NS genes.

Properties Strains Collection Date/Year Accession Number for gene:
PB1 PB2 PA HA NP NA MP NS
Reference B/Lee/40 1940 DQ792895 DQ792894 DQ792896 DQ792897 DQ792898 DQ792899 DQ792900 DQ792901
Reference B/Yamagata/16/88 1988 CY018771 CY018772 CY018770 CY018765 CY018768 CY018767 CY018766 CY018769
Reference B/Victoria/02/1987 1987 CY018763 CY018764 CY018762 CY018757 CY018760 CY018759 CY018758 CY018761
WHO Vaccine B/Brisbane/3/2007 2007-03-09 CY155904 CY155905 CY155903 CY155898 CY155901 CY155900 CY155899 CY155902
WHO Vaccine B/Florida/4/2006 2006 CY033882 CY033883 CY033881 CY073895 CY033879 CY033878 CY033877 CY033880
WHO Vaccine B/Massachusetts/02/2012 2012-03-13 EPI439263 EPI439262 EPI439261 EPI376346 EPI439258 EPI376345 EPI439260 EPI439259
WHO Vaccine B/Phuket/3073/2013 2013-11-21 EPI544262 EPI544261 EPI547694 EPI544264 EPI544260 EPI544263 EPI592901 EPI547693
WHO Vaccine B/Brisbane/09/2014 2014-03-24 EPI544257 EPI544256 EPI544255 EPI544259 EPI544253 EPI544258 EPI544397 EPI544254
WHO Vaccine B/Utah/09/2014 2014-05-29 EPI544271 EPI544270 EPI544269 EPI544273 EPI544268 EPI544272 EPI544396 EPI544395
WHO Vaccine B/Wisconsin/01/2010 2010-02-20 CY115189 CY115190 CY115188 CY115183 CY115186 CY115185 CY115184 CY115187
WHO Vaccine B/Hubei-Wujiagang/158/2009 2009 CY115389 CY115390 CY115388 CY115383 CY115386 CY115385 CY115384 CY115387
WHO Vaccine B/Texas/06/2011 2011-02-16 EPI354063 EPI331184 EPI331183 EPI331186 EPI354062 EPI331185 EPI331182 EPI331181
WHO Reference B/Stockholm/12/2011 2011-02-28 - - - EPI357403 - EPI357402 - EPI357401
WHO Vaccine B/Bangladesh/3333/2007 2007 CY115261 CY115262 CY115260 CY115255 CY115258 CY115257 CY115256 CY115259
WHO Vaccine B/Brisbane/33/2008 2008-07-13 EPI370452 EPI370453 EPI370451 EPI163726 EPI370450 EPI186302 EPI370449 EPI370448
WHO Vaccine B/Brisbane/60/2008 2008-08-04 CY115157 CY115158 CY115156 CY115151 CY115154 CY115153 CY115152 CY115155
WHO Vaccine B/Nevada/03/2011 2011-02-02 EPI354045 EPI354044 EPI354043 EPI331151 EPI354041 EPI331150 EPI354042 EPI331149
WHO Vaccine B/Texas/02/2013 2013-01-09 EPI443688 EPI443687 EPI443686 EPI443690 EPI447191 EPI443689 EPI447193 EPI447192
WHO Vaccine B/Bangladesh/5945/2009 2009-09-30 CY115365 CY115366 CY115364 CY115359 CY115362 CY115361 CY115360 CY115363
WHO Vaccine B/Hong Kong/259/2010 2010 CY115197 CY115198 CY115196 CY115191 CY115194 CY115193 CY115192 CY115195
WHO Reference B/Hong Kong/514/2009 2009-10-11 - - - EPI243627 - EPI243626 - -
Reference B/Bahrain/18/2013 2013-01-14 EPI491090 EPI491089 EPI491088 EPI491092 EPI491085 EPI491091 EPI491087 EPI491086
Reference B/Thailand/CU-B6096/2012 2012-03-13 JX513099 JX513100 JX513101 JX513102 JX513103 JX513104 JX513105 JX513106
Reference B/Thailand/CU-B6240/2012 2012-05-23 EPI635425 EPI635441 EPI635409 EPI635313 EPI635377 EPI635355 EPI635336 EPI635393
Reference B/Nicaragua/AGB2-26/2012 2012-08-20 EPI529042 EPI528983 EPI529041 EPI529036 EPI529039 EPI529038 EPI529037 EPI529040
Reference B/New York/1331/2012 2012-02-28 CY176007 CY176008 CY176006 CY176001 CY176004 CY176003 CY176002 CY176005
Malaysian B/Malaysia/U1429/2012 2012-11-09 KX269974* KX269980* KX269986* KR073380 KX269992* KR073549 KX269998* KX270004*
Malaysian B/Malaysia/U2214/2013 2013-03-29 KX269975* KX269981* KX269987* KR073421 KX269993* KR073590 KX269999* KX270005*
Malaysian B/Malaysia/U2462/2013 2013-05-31 KX269976* KX269982* KX269988* KR073441 KX269994* KR073609 KX270000* KX270006*
Malaysian B/Malaysia/U2555/2013 2013-06-26 KX269977* KX269983* KX269989* KR073446 KX269995* KR073614 KX270001* KX270007*
Malaysian B/Malaysia/U3224/2013 2013-12-13 KX269978* KX269984* KX269990* KR073450 KX269996* KR073617 KX270002* KX270008*
Malaysian B/Malaysia/U3901/2014 2014-05-16 KX269979* KX269985* KX269991* KR073493 KX269997* KR073659 KX270003* KX270009*

‘-’: Sequences not available;

‘*’: Sequences that were obtained in this study.

Results and Discussion

There were 164/3,935 (children and adult outpatients) and 37/59 (hospitalized children) nasopharyngeal samples positive for HA and NA genes of influenza B viruses (S3 Table). Phylogenetic analysis of both genes identified similar circulation of Yamagata- and Victoria-lineage as well as Yam-2, Yam-3 and Vic-1 viruses between children and adult outpatients, and hospitalized children (S1 and S2 Figs, S3 Table). Furthermore, the analysis showed 36 B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses (28 in children and adult outpatients, 8 in hospitalized children) with intra-clade reassortment properties (HA-B/Wisconsin/01/2010-like/NA-B/Stockholm/12/2012-like) within Yam-3, one unique inter-clade reassortant (HA-Yam-2/NA-Yam-3) and one unique intra-clade reassortant within Vic-1 (HA-Vic-1B/NA-Vic-1A) (S1 and S2 Figs, S3 Table). To investigate the reassortment pattern of all eight gene segments of these reassortants from the lineage to the sub-clade level, four earliest detected B/Phuket/3073/2013-like intra-clade reassortants and the two unique reassortants sampled between 2012 and 2014 were chosen for further whole-genome analysis.

The phylogenetic trees reconstructed by the ML method for PB1, PB2, PA, HA, NP, NA, MP and NS genes are illustrated in Fig 1 and S3 Fig, which consist of selected Malaysian reassortants, WHO candidate vaccine and reference strains, as well as selected strains from other countries that were closely related to the selected Malaysian reassortants (≥99% sequence identities on all genes based on NCBI BLAST [26]). Consistent with other reports [7, 13, 15], the lineages for other genes (except for NS gene) were first assigned in the same manner as the HA gene, with lineages that resembled B/Yamagata/16/88-like viruses (Yam-like) designated as Lineage II, the lineages that resembled B/Victoria/2/87-like viruses (Vic-like) designated as Lineage III. The lineage that did not resemble any of the Vic- or Yam-like viruses was designated as Lineage IV (as for the case of NS gene) (Fig 1). Under such assignment, it was apparent that the tree topology for PB1, PB2, and HA genes appeared very similar, such that Yam-like and Vic-like viruses were clustered in Lineage II and III, respectively. On the other hand, the phylogenetic trees of PA, NP, NA and MP genes showed that all viruses were clustered in Lineage II (Yam-like). Furthermore, phylogenetic analysis of the NS gene showed that all viruses clustered together to form a distinct Lineage IV. The incongruent phylogenetic patterns observed at the lineage level corroborated with previous reports [7, 13, 15, 16], which suggest that the phylogenies of eight gene segments could be divided into three distinct evolutionary profiles: (i) PB1, PB2 and HA genes derived from either Lineage II or III; (ii) PA, NP, NA and MP genes derived from Lineage II; and (iii) NS genes derived from Lineage IV. Firstly, the consistent grouping of Yam-like or Vic-like viruses in Lineage II or III, respectively, in the tree topology of PB1, PB2 and HA genes could be attributed to possible genetic linkage between these three gene segments, which has been described [8]. They suggested that this pattern of co-assortment is due to the action of selection and would possibly have an effect on the whole-genome fitness of influenza B viruses [8], but the origin of this strong genetic linkage between these segments remains unclear. Secondly, for PA, NP, NA and MP gene segments, their highly similar evolutionary patterns also suggest possible functional association among the proteins [1315], though such association remains to be investigated. Lastly, a separate lineage (Lineage IV) exhibited in the NS tree suggests that all Yam-like and Vic-like viruses possessed a NS gene segment with an unknown origin and reassortment event [7]. Taken together, the distinct evolutionary profiles shared between certain gene segments indicate that some of these genes would likely reassort together between lineages. However, whether the disappearance of a lineage in a gene segment (particularly the absence of Lineage III in PA, NP, NA and MP; Lineage II and III in NS) from the population is permanent or transient requires a large-scale analysis of genetic data.

Fig 1. Phylogenetic comparsion based on nucleotdie sequences of PB1, PB2, PA, HA, NP, NA, MP and NS genes with that of WHO candidate vaccine (marked with #) and reference strains, Malaysian influenza B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants (marked in black circles), and strains from different countries (in italic).

Fig 1

Phylogenetic trees were reconstructed by maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates using PAUP 4.0. Bootstrap values ≥60 are shown. Scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.01 substitutions/site.

The pattern of genetic reassortment became slightly less complex when influenza B viruses were phylogenetically classified into three major clades following the WHO genetic groupings [11, 12] for all gene segments: Victoria Clade 1 (Vic-1, represented by B/Brisbane/60/2008-like viruses), Yamagata Clade 1 (Yam-1, represented by B/Florida/4/2006-like viruses), Yamagata Clade 2 (Yam-2, represented by B/Brisbane/3/2007-like viruses) and Yamagata Clade 3 (Yam-3, represented by B/Bangladesh/3333/2007) (Fig 1). The tree topology showing three distinct clusters represented by major clades of Vic-1, Yam-2 and Yam-3 was similar in most of the gene segments except for the NP gene in which all Vic-1-like viruses appeared to reside within Yam-3. The sharing of a common ancestor between Vic-1-like viruses and B/Wisconsin/01/2010-like viruses (Yam-3-like viruses) in the NP gene was not observed for PA, NA and MP genes, even though previous observation at the lineage level showed that all four genes of Vic-like viruses were derived from Lineage II (Yam-like). This suggests that all Vic-1-like viruses selected in this study had an intra-lineage (or inter-clade) reassortment event that involved only the NP gene. To our knowledge, this unique reassortment property, observed in one of our Malaysian Vic-1-like virus (B/Malaysia/U1429/2012) as well as other B/Brisbane/60/2008-like viruses (Figs 1 and 2) have not been described in any reports of the whole-genome analysis of influenza B viruses.

Fig 2. Reassortment properties of the Malaysian B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants at the lineage, clade and sub-clade level.

Fig 2

In addition, one of our unique inter-clade reassortants (B/Malaysia/U2214/2013) which possessed HA-Yam-2/NA-Yam-3 had a genomic pattern of HA and NP that derived from Yam-2 while the rest of the gene segments were derived from Yam-3 (Figs 1 and 2). It was initially expected that PB1, PB2 and HA would derive from the same clade of Yam-2, given that a previous report suggested these three gene segments would tend to co-assort during a reassortment event [8]. As such unique reassortment pattern from B/Malaysia/U2214/2013 virus was not observed in the majority of other ‘pure’ Yam-3-like or Yam-2-like viruses (Fig 1 and S3 Fig), this phenomenon could possibly be attributed to a random intra-lineage (or inter-clade) reassortment event within the Yamagata lineage [18, 27].

Reassortment of gene segments within the major circulating clades was further investigated. Using the HA phylogeny as a reference for phylogenetic classification of other gene segments, two monophyletic clusters observed within Yam-3 were first given a designation of Wisconsin/01-like and Stockholm/12-like sub-clades [10], representing B/Wisconsin/01/2010-like and B/Stockholm/12/2011-like viruses, respectively (Fig 1). For Vic-1, two monophyletic clusters were also observed within this clade, provisionally named as Victoria-1A sub-clade (Vic-1A: represented by B/Brisbane/60/2008-like or B/Texas/02/2013-like viruses) and Victoria-1B sub-clade (Vic-1B: represented by B/Hong Kong/514/2008-like or B/Hong Kong/259/2010-like viruses) (Fig 1). Phylogenetic classification and designation of these clusters have not been widely reported as most studies and WHO interim reports on influenza vaccines did not classify influenza B viruses beyond the three major circulating clades (Yam-2, Yam-3 and Vic-1) [1113, 28, 29]. By adapting the only influenza virus clade definition criteria developed and reported by the WHO/OIE/FAO H5N1 Evolution Working Group (WHO/OIE/FAO, 2012), phylogenetic analyses and nucleotide sequence divergence calculations of all gene segments showed that these four clusters shared a common ancestral node, had a monophyletic grouping with a bootstrap value of ≥60 and maintained an average within- and between-clade pairwise nucleotide distance of ≤1.5% and ≥1.5%, respectively. However, in the MP and NS phylogenetic trees, a unique and previously unrecognized monophyletic cluster was observed, which was provisionally assigned as Victoria-1C sub-clade (Vic-1C). Viruses within this sub-clade shared a common ancestral node with a bootstrap value of ≥70, and had an average percentage of pairwise nucleotide distances between clades (comparing with Vic-1A and Vic-1B) of 1.16 ± 0.3% and 1.46 ± 0.3%, respectively, similar to the cutoff of 1.5% set in the criteria mentioned [30]. For Yam-2, only one cluster was observed for all gene segments, namely Massachusetts/02-like sub-clade (represented by B/Massachusetts/02/2012-like viruses) (Fig 1).

Based on phylogenetic analysis of only HA and NA genes, we initially deduced that the four Malaysian viruses were B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses within Yam-3, due to observation of intra-clade reassortment between HA and NA [10]. However, to our surprise, when all gene segments were phylogenetically analyzed and classified at the sub-clade level, it was observed that only three Malaysian B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses (B/Malaysia/U2555/2013, B/Malaysia/U3224/2013 and B/Malaysia/U3901/2014) and other B/Phuket/3073/2013-like candidate vaccine strains (B/Brisbane/09/2014 and B/Utah/08/2014) were classified as intra-clade reassortants within Yam-3 (Figs 1 and 2). They possessed PB1, PB2, HA, NP, MP and NS genes that were grouped under the Wisconsin/01-like sub-clade while their PA and NA genes were grouped under the Stockholm/12-like sub-clade. As shown earlier, the evolutionary patterns of PA, NP, NA and MP genes of Vic-like and Yam-like viruses at the lineage level are similar in which they were grouped under Lineage II, suggesting possible co-assortment of these genes. However, evolutionary patterns at the sub-clade level further shows that PA and NA genes have a higher tendency to co-assort during reassortment of gene segments. Whether such co-assortment is due to a “functional linkage” between both gene segments in influenza B genome or due to a random reassortment event that increases the fitness of the virus and results in the global emergence of B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses remain to be elucidated.

While the other presumably B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus (B/Malaysia/U2462/2012) had seven gene segments that were phylogenetically identical to B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses, the NS gene was derived from B/Stockholm/12/2011-like virus instead of B/Wisconsin/01/2010-like virus. Hence it was re-classified as a unique reassortant instead of a B/Phuket/3073/2013-like virus (Figs 1 and 2). No other B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses were found to share similar reassortment pattern with B/Malaysia/U2462/2012 (S3 Fig). For the other unique reassortants found based on phylogenetic analysis of HA and NA genes, the inter-clade reassortant (B/Malaysia/U2214/2013 which had HA-Yam-2-like/NA-Yam-3-like) had a NS gene that derived from B/Wisconsin/01/2010-like virus instead of B/Stockholm/12/2011-like virus. In addition, the Vic-like inter-lineage reassortant (B/Malaysia/U1429/2012) also showed inter- and intra-clade reassortment properties (PB2 and HA derived from Vic-1B; PB1, PA, NP, and NA from Vic-1A; MP and NS from Vic-1C). This pattern was also observed in only one Asian virus, B/Thailand/CU-B6240/2012, which shared identical reassortment properties with B/Malaysia/U1429/2012 (Fig 1 and S3 Fig). With that, the phylogeny of each gene segments observed at the sub-clade level in these unique reassortants suggests that a random reassortment event within a clade may occur and these reassortants are probably circulating at a very low level [18, 27]. Of note, the overall genetic makeup of these unique reassortants were distinct from the WHO recommended Yamagata-like (B/Wisconsin/01/2010-like in 2013, B/Massachusetts/02/2012 in 2014, B/Phuket/3073/2013 in 2015 and 2016) and Victoria-like (B/Brisbane/60/2008-like from 2012 to 2016 and B/Hong Kong/259/2010-like from 2014 to 2016) vaccine strains for the Southern Hemisphere (Fig 2). As information regarding the vaccine uptake of patients infected by these unique reassortants were not recorded, whether such reassortants caused more severe disease than the predominant circulating strains with enhanced viral fitness or whether they were able to be recognized effectively by antibodies generated by the recommended vaccine strains remains in question. Hence, influenza surveillance coupled with phylogenetic analyses should be intensified in order to detect more low-level circulating unique reassortants that may contribute to future outbreaks.

In conclusion, this present study highlights the strategy used for the phylogenetic classification of all gene segments of influenza B viruses, which classifies all genes at the lineage, clade and sub-clade level. This strategy for lineage classification was adapted from previously reported methods [7, 13, 15, 16], while the strategy for clade and sub-clade classification was adapted from the WHO interim reports [11, 12] and criteria used for H5N1 classification [30], respectively. Adaptation of this approach in future studies with a larger dataset of whole-genome sequences may perhaps allow a better understanding of the complexity of segment reassortments in influenza B evolution which may contribute to future vaccine design, and also for better monitoring of unique reassortants in surveillance studies.

Supporting Information

S1 Fig. Phylogenetic anlaysis of the HA gene of influenza B viruses in Malaysia using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates using PAUP 4.0 with complete taxa identity.

Bootstrap values ≥60 are shown. Malaysian B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants are highlighted in bold and purple. Scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.01 substitutions/site.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Phylogenetic anlaysis of the NA gene of influenza B viruses in Malaysia using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates using PAUP 4.0 with complete taxa identity.

Bootstrap values ≥60 are shown. Malaysian B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants are highlighted in bold and purple. Scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.01 substitutions/site.

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Phylogenetic analyses of the HA, NA, PB1, PB2, PA, NP, MP and NS genes using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates using PAUP 4.0 to detect for global viruses that share similar reassortment pattern with the Malaysian influenza B unique reassortants.

Analyses began by retrieving complete genomes of 6,832 influenza B isolates from GISAID database. With this set of data, phylogenetic analysis on the HA gene was performed and a total of 51 strains were found to be closely related (by forming a cluster and have ≥99% sequence identities in BLAST) with our reassortants. These 51 strains were then used as references for all gene segments. Bootstrap values ≥60 are shown. Malaysian B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants are highlighted in bold. Scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.01 substitutions/site.

(PDF)

S1 Table. Reagents and thermocycling conditions used for two-step reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for amplification of influenza B PB1, PB2, PA, HA, NP, NA, MP and NS genes.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Primer sets used for the PCR amplification of PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NP, NA, MP and NS genes of influenza B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants detected in Malaysia.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. HA and NA genes of influenza B virus clinical isolates sequenced in previous and in this study.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Nyoke Pin Wong, See Wie Teoh, Yong Kek Pang, Nik Sherina Hanafi, Tommy Tsan-Yuk Lam, and the diagnostic virology laboratory in UMMC for assistance and support.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by grants from the Ministry of Education, Malaysia (High Impact Research UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOE/CHAN/02/02 and UM.C/625/1/HIR/MOHE/MED/42), the Postgraduate Research Fund (PG084-2015A), and sanofi-aventis, Malaysia (FLU29-EXT). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. There was no additional external funding received for this study.

References

  • 1.Lamb RA, Choppin PW. The gene structure and replication of influenza virus. Annu Rev Biochem. 1983;52(1):467–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Krystal M, Elliott RM, Benz EW Jr, Young JF, Palese P. Evolution of influenza A and B viruses: conservation of structural features in the hemagglutinin genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1982;79(15):4800–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Rota PA, Wallis TR, Harmon MW, Rota JS, Kendal AP, Nerome K. Cocirculation of two distinct evolutionary lineages of influenza type B virus since 1983. Virology. 1990;175(1):59–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kanegae Y, Sugita S, Endo A, Ishida M, Senya S, Osako K, et al. Evolutionary pattern of the hemagglutinin gene of influenza B viruses isolated in Japan: cocirculating lineages in the same epidemic season. J Virol. 1990;64(6):2860–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McCullers JA, Wang GC, He S, Webster RG. Reassortment and insertion-deletion are strategies for the evolution of influenza B viruses in nature. J Virol. 1999;73(9):7343–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McCullers JA, Saito T, Iverson AR. Multiple genotypes of influenza B virus circulated between 1979 and 2003. J Virol. 2004;78(23):12817–28. 10.1128/JVI.78.23.12817-12828.2004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Chen R, Holmes EC. The evolutionary dynamics of human influenza B virus. J Mol Evol. 2008;66(6):655–63. 10.1007/s00239-008-9119-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dudas G, Bedford T, Lycett S, Rambaut A. Reassortment between influenza B lineages and the emergence of a coadapted PB1-PB2-HA gene complex. Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(1):162–72. 10.1093/molbev/msu287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Vijaykrishna D, Holmes EC, Joseph U, Fourment M, Su YC, Halpin R, et al. The contrasting phylodynamics of human influenza B viruses. ELife. 2015;4:e05055 10.7554/eLife.05055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Oong XY, Ng KT, Lam TT, Pang YK, Chan KG, Hanafi NS, et al. Epidemiological and evolutionary dynamics of influenza B viruses in Malaysia, 2012–2014. PLoS One. 2015;10(8):e0136254 10.1371/journal.pone.0136254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.WHO. Influenza Centre London. September 2014 interim report. Report prepared for the WHO annual consultation on the composition of influenza vaccine for the Southern Hemisphere 2015. 22nd-24th September 2014. 2014.
  • 12.WHO. Influenza Centre London. February 2015 interim report. Report prepared for the WHO annual consultation on the composition of influenza vaccine for the Northern Hemisphere 2015/16. 23rd -25th February 2015. 2015.
  • 13.Tewawong N, Suwannakarn K, Prachayangprecha S, Korkong S, Vichiwattana P, Vongpunsawad S, et al. Molecular epidemiology and phylogenetic analyses of influenza B virus in Thailand during 2010 to 2014. PLoS One. 2015;10(1):e0116302 10.1371/journal.pone.0116302 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fang Q, Gao Y, Chen M, Guo X, Yang X, Wei L. Molecular epidemiology and evolution of influenza A and B viruses during winter 2013–2014 in Beijing, China. Arch Virol. 2015;160(4):1083–95. 10.1007/s00705-015-2362-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zhu N, Li P, Yu J, Li Y, Zhao J, Xia H, et al. Molecular characterization of influenza B viruses isolated in east-central China in 2009–2010. Virus Genes. 2013;46(1):28–38. 10.1007/s11262-012-0826-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Patil KN, Bhise AB, Dakhave MR, Kadam AA, Chadha MS, Potdar VA. Whole-genome analysis of influenza B viruses of multiple genotypes cocirculating in India. Genome Announc. 2013;1(6):e00951–13. 10.1128/genomeA.00951-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yang JR, Huang YP, Chang FY, Hsu LC, Lin YC, Huang HY, et al. Phylogenetic and evolutionary history of influenza B viruses, which caused a large epidemic in 2011–2012, Taiwan. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47179 10.1371/journal.pone.0047179 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sam IC, Su YC, Chan YF, Nor'E SS, Hassan A, Jafar FL, et al. Evolution of influenza B virus in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, between 1995 and 2008. J Virol. 2015;89(18):9689–92. 10.1128/JVI.00708-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pabbaraju K, Wong S, Tokaryk KL, Fonseca K, Drews SJ. Comparison of the Luminex xTAG respiratory viral panel with xTAG respiratory viral panel fast for diagnosis of respiratory virus infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49(5):1738–44. 10.1128/JCM.02090-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Loens K, Bergs K, Ursi D, Goossens H, Ieven M. Evaluation of NucliSens easyMAG for automated nucleic acid extraction from various clinical specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 2007;45(2):421–5. 10.1128/JCM.00894-06 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.WHO. WHO information for molecular diagnosis of influenza virus. Updated March 2014. 2014.
  • 22.Bao Y, Bolotov P, Dernovoy D, Kiryutin B, Zaslavsky L, Tatusova T, et al. The influenza virus resource at the National Center for Biotechnology Information. J Virol. 2008;82(2):596–601. 10.1128/JVI.02005-07 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.GISAID. EpiFlu™ database. 2016. http://platform.gisaid.org.
  • 24.Katoh K, Asimenos G, Toh H. Multiple alignment of DNA sequences with MAFFT. Methods Mol Biol. 2009;537:39–64. 10.1007/978-1-59745-251-9_3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Swofford DL. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Version 4. 2003.
  • 26.Johnson M, Zaretskaya I, Raytselis Y, Merezhuk Y, McGinnis S, Madden TL. NCBI BLAST: a better web interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36:W5–9. 10.1093/nar/gkn201 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tan Y, Guan W, Lam TT, Pan S, Wu S, Zhan Y, et al. Differing epidemiological dynamics of influenza B virus lineages in Guangzhou, southern China, 2009–2010. J Virol. 2013;87(22):12447–56. 10.1128/JVI.01039-13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Arvia R, Corcioli F, Pierucci F, Azzi A. Molecular markers of influenza B lineages and clades. Viruses. 2014;6(11):4437–46. 10.3390/v6114437 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Byarugaba DK, Erima B, Millard M, Kibuuka H, L L, Bwogi J, et al. Genetic analysis of influenza B viruses isolated in Uganda during the 2009–2010 seasons. Virol J. 2013;10:11 10.1186/1743-422X-10-11 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.WHO/OIE/FAO. Continued evolution of highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1): updated nomenclature. Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2012;6(1):1–5. 10.1111/j.1750-2659.2011.00298.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

S1 Fig. Phylogenetic anlaysis of the HA gene of influenza B viruses in Malaysia using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates using PAUP 4.0 with complete taxa identity.

Bootstrap values ≥60 are shown. Malaysian B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants are highlighted in bold and purple. Scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.01 substitutions/site.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Phylogenetic anlaysis of the NA gene of influenza B viruses in Malaysia using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates using PAUP 4.0 with complete taxa identity.

Bootstrap values ≥60 are shown. Malaysian B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants are highlighted in bold and purple. Scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.01 substitutions/site.

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Phylogenetic analyses of the HA, NA, PB1, PB2, PA, NP, MP and NS genes using the maximum likelihood (ML) method with 1,000 bootstrap replicates using PAUP 4.0 to detect for global viruses that share similar reassortment pattern with the Malaysian influenza B unique reassortants.

Analyses began by retrieving complete genomes of 6,832 influenza B isolates from GISAID database. With this set of data, phylogenetic analysis on the HA gene was performed and a total of 51 strains were found to be closely related (by forming a cluster and have ≥99% sequence identities in BLAST) with our reassortants. These 51 strains were then used as references for all gene segments. Bootstrap values ≥60 are shown. Malaysian B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants are highlighted in bold. Scale bar represents a genetic distance of 0.01 substitutions/site.

(PDF)

S1 Table. Reagents and thermocycling conditions used for two-step reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for amplification of influenza B PB1, PB2, PA, HA, NP, NA, MP and NS genes.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Primer sets used for the PCR amplification of PB2, PB1, PA, HA, NP, NA, MP and NS genes of influenza B/Phuket/3073/2013-like viruses and unique reassortants detected in Malaysia.

(DOCX)

S3 Table. HA and NA genes of influenza B virus clinical isolates sequenced in previous and in this study.

(DOCX)

Data Availability Statement

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES