Abstract
We investigated how landmarks influence the brain’s computation of head direction and found that in a bi-directionally symmetrical environment, some neurons in dysgranular retrosplenial cortex showed bi-directional firing patterns. This indicates dominance of neural activity by local environmental cues even when these conflict with the global head direction signal. It suggests a mechanism for associating landmarks to or dissociating them from the head direction signal, according to their directional stability/utility.
The “sense of direction” is computed by head direction (HD) cells1, which fire when the animal faces a particular direction. The head direction signal is derived from learned environmental landmarks2, but the brain needs to know that these are spatially stable before it can use them as directional markers3. This circular problem thus requires an interplay between the existing directional representation and newly encountered landmarks. We investigated the hypothesis that retrosplenial cortex (RSC), a HD structure that processes landmark stability4, is involved in this interplay process. RSC is a cortical region5–7 that is directly connected to visual cortex as well as to the main HD network8. We exposed rats to an environment where global and local directional cues were in conflict and recorded RSC neurons, as well as head direction cells from anterior thalamus and post-subiculum. Rats freely moved between two connected, rectangular compartments (Supplementary Fig. 1), each having landmarks that were reversed in orientation relative to those in the other, thus dissociating local landmarks and global direction. To orient the global head direction system, the symmetry of the apparatus was broken by scenting one compartment with lemon and the other with vanilla.
Of 1090 RSC neurons (Supplementary Table 1), we identified 96 classic HD cells (9%), each with a single tuning curve that maintained a constant direction across compartments and thus reversed its relation to the local cues depending on odor context (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 2 and Supplementary Table 2). This confirms that HD cells can use odor-context information to resolve spatial ambiguity. However, many neurons had two opposing head-direction tuning curves (Fig. 1b; Supplementary Fig. 3). We derived a measure of this bi-directional firing to identify 116 of these ‘bi-directional’ (BD) cells (11%) (Supplementary Fig. 4) and undertook several analyses to rule out that the bi-directional pattern could have been recording artefact (Supplementary Fig. 5). Moreover, many BD cells showed compartment-specific activity (see below), meaning that the individuals in the putative cell-pairs would have to have fired in only one compartment, which has never been observed in HD cells.
Forty-six of the BD neurons were compartment-specific (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 3), meaning that the cells actually had uni-directional firing but this reversed each time the rat passed through the doorway, producing a bi-directional pattern overall. This was shown by analyzing each compartment separately and also by closing the door, after which tuning curves became uni-directional (Fig. 1b). This reversal between compartments means that the tuning curves maintained the same relationship to the local landmarks. BD cells were recorded simultaneously with the non-reversing HD cells (Fig. 1c; Supplementary Fig. 6), such that the cells dissociated their responses when the rat changed compartments. BD cells also followed apparatus rotation more reliably than HD cells (Supplementary Fig. 7). Thus, a population of RSC neurons is dissociable from the main head direction network and is dominated by landmarks, an observation that refutes the previous belief that the entire head direction network is coherent9,10.
We looked for bi-directional firing in two other HD-cell regions, postsubiculum and the anterior thalamus, but here found only classic HD cells (Fig. 2a). In addition, histology revealed that BD cells were recorded exclusively in the dysgranular RSC, while HD cells were distributed across both granular and dysgranular RSC (Fig 2b; Supplementary Fig. 8).
To test whether the bi-directional pattern is dependent on the rotated local visual cues, we recorded 12 BD cells in darkness: they maintained their bi-directional pattern (Supplementary Fig. 9a-c), suggesting that multimodal inputs can support the directionality of firing. Interestingly, 9 BD cells recorded in an open field lost their bi-directional pattern (Supplementary Fig. 9d, e).
Unexpectedly, as well as the 46 cells described above that reversed firing between compartments, which we named between-compartment bi-directional cells (BC-BD), we found 70 cells that expressed a bi-directional pattern within each compartment (Fig. 2c and Fig. 3a, b; Supplementary Fig. 10). As before, detailed analyses ruled out that the within-compartment bi-directional (WC-BD) cells could have been recording artefact. The doubled tuning curves were slightly asymmetric, with a dominant (slightly larger) peak that reversed direction between compartments (Fig. 3c), indicating a contributing influence of local landmarks. We examined whether WC-BD cells expressed two simultaneous tuning curves, or a single curve that reversed frequently within compartments. Two tuning curves might result in increased overall spike count relative to HD cells (because the cells can fire in two directions instead of just one), while a single tuning curve that switched would result in lower and more variable firing rates and a higher proportion of pauses in firing, producing long inter-spike intervals (ISIs). In fact, spike count was intermediate, being 37% higher than for HD cells, and 42% higher than for BC-BD cells, both differences being significant (Fig 3d). Firing rates did not differ for the three directional cell types, either for peak rates or mean rates (Supplementary Table 3). Also, spread of firing rates was no different (Fig 3e), and inter-spike interval (ISI) analysis showed no increase in long intervals; moreover, analysis of the ISI histogram decay time-to-half-peak showed no difference between cell types (Supplementary Table 3). Taken together, these results suggest that WC-BD cells have true dual tuning curves, one being slightly smaller, rather than single, periodically reversing ones.
What could cause this within-compartment bi-directional pattern? It is likely due to the rat’s previous experience of the two-compartment space and may reflect acquisition of new inputs from co-active HD cells during initial exploration (Supplementary Fig. 11). In our apparatus, because of the visual reversal, a landmark-driven BD cell is co-active with two sets of HD cells having opposing firing directions. If these HD cells become additional new inputs due to Hebbian learning, the cell would now be driven to fire in both directions. This could explain why for WC-BD cells, one tuning curve was slightly stronger (because it has additional drive from the landmarks), and why this asymmetry was compartment-specific (Fig. 3c). As well as evidence of interaction with the head direction signal, we found evidence of spatially modulated activity in a subset of cells (Supplementary Fig. 12), suggesting a more general integrative role for this region.
What could be the function of BD cells? It may be to mediate both ways between visual landmarks and the global HD signal. A network of neurons having varying degrees of coupling between the two systems could use landmarks to compute head direction and, at the same time, use the head direction signal to compute landmark stability; in this “bootstrapping” manner, stable landmarks could be added to the constellation of inputs able to drive head direction cells, and unstable landmarks removed from it. This hypothesis is consistent with evidence from gene activation studies suggesting a role for dysgranular RSC in spatial tasks requiring light (i.e. vision) but not darkness11,12, human neuroimaging studies showing a role for RSC in monitoring landmark stability4 and local reference frames13, or integrating across scenes14, and from recording studies suggesting plasticity in the connections of landmarks to the HD network15. Thus, the network could function to learn which cues are the directionally stable ones that have a consistent relationship to the head direction signal, and so can act as landmarks to define a local directional reference frame.
Methods
Data collection and analysis were not performed blind to the conditions of the experiments.
Subjects
All procedures were carried out under the auspices of a Home Office license according to the Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986. Nine adult male Lister Hooded rats weighing 300-350g were individually housed under partial light-cycle shift (6h) to allow recordings during their circadian dark cycle. They were mildly food restricted (to 90% free-feeding weight) and were weighed and checked daily.
Microdrives and surgery
Recordings were made using tetrodes, each composed of four twisted 25 μm or eight twisted 17 μm polyimide-coated platinum-iridium (90%/10%) wires (California Fine Wire, CA), attached to an Axona microdrive (Axona Ltd, Herts, UK). Under isoflurane anaesthesia the electrodes were chronically implanted in the left or right hemisphere. For 4 rats the electrodes were implanted in the RSC aimed at the granular subregion (n = 1 rat; co-ordinates in mm from Bregma: AP: -5.5, ML: ±0.4, DV: 0.4), or dysgranular subregion (n = 3 rats; AP: -5.5, ML: ±1.0, DV: 0.4). For three rats the electrodes were aimed at postsubiculum (AP: -7.5, ML: ±3.2, DV: -2.0) and for two rats they were aimed at the anterodorsal thalamic nucleus (ADN; AP: -1.8, ML: ±1.4, DV: -3.9). After the surgery, rats received meloxicam mixed with condensed milk for three days for post-operative analgesia, and were given at least 7 days to recover before the experiment began.
Apparatus
The recording apparatus (Fig. 1a, Supplementary Fig. 1a) was a 120 x 120 cm square box with 60 cm high walls, isolated from the rest of the room by a cylindrical curtain 260 cm in diameter. The box was divided into two equal rectangular sub-compartments by a 60 cm high wall, in the center of which was an aperture, 10 cm at the base and 15 cm at the top, which allowed free movement between compartments. The compartments were each polarized by a 20 cm wide x 40 cm high plastic white cue card attached to the short wall and located to the left when facing the doorway. Walls and floor were covered with black vinyl sheets, allowing the experimenter to wipe each compartment with a sponge moistened with lemon or vanilla food flavoring so as to allow the rat to distinguish the compartments. Six circularly arranged ceiling lights lighted the box and a non-tuned radio was fixed to the ceiling in a central position relative to the box, producing a background noise >70 dB to mask un-controlled directional sounds. For recordings made in darkness, the cue cards were removed so as to minimize focal olfactory/tactile landmarks.
Recording setup and procedure
For recording, the microdrive connector was attached to the headstage/recording cable through which the signals from each wire were amplified, filtered, digitized (48 kHz) and stored by an Axona DacqUSB acquisition system. Spikes were amplified 3000-5000 times and bandpass-filtered between 0.8 and 6.7 kHz; local field potential (LFP) signals were amplified 1000 times and filtered between 0 and 475 Hz. Two light-emitting diodes (LEDs), one large and one small and separated by 5 cm, were attached to the headstage assembly to provide the position and the orientation of the rat’s head. The LEDs were imaged with an overhead camera at a sampling rate of 50 Hz.
Beginning 1 week after surgery, the animals were screened daily for single unit activity. Screening were made in a small box, outside the curtain. Tetrodes were lowered 50 μm if no single unit activity was found, or after a complete recording session. When a set of units was isolated, the animal was transferred to the experimental apparatus inside the curtained area and a sequence of five recording trials was run, as follows:
Trial 1 (Baseline): The orientation of the box was random with respect to the outside room. Rats were placed in one of the compartments, facing in a randomly determined direction. For two RSC implanted rats, starting compartments were initially the same for every trial, but then switched to being randomly selected. For the remaining two RSC implanted rats it was always random. For 10 minutes the animals freely moved between compartments foraging for cooked sweetened rice thrown in sporadically by the experimenter.
Trial 2 (Rotated baseline): As for trial 1 but the box was randomly rotated by 45° or 90° or 180°, clockwise or counter-clockwise, to check local cue control of directional firing.
Trial 3 (Door closed odor 1): The apparatus was again arbitrarily rotated and the animal placed in one of the compartments (randomly chosen): the connecting door was closed so the rat was confined to that compartment for a five-minute trial. This was to see whether the odor cues alone were enough to reinstate the correct orientation of firing.
Trial 4 (Door closed odor 2): The apparatus was rotated and the rat recorded in the other compartment for five min.
Trial 5 (Baseline): A last standard 10-min door-open trial was run with the apparatus having the same orientation as in trial 1.
Between trials, animals were removed from the apparatus and placed in a box in a random location outside the curtain for 2 minutes, in order to let the experimenter manipulate the box (rotation of the apparatus and/or closing or opening the door). The animal was then mildly disoriented, by rotating its holding box, before the next trial.
For some recording sessions, two ten-minute darkness trials were added after trial 5. For the first of these (trial 6 – Darkness), animals were not removed from the box after trial 5, but the computer screen and ceiling lights were turned off before recording began. After this trial, the animal was removed, the box randomly rotated and the rat mildly disorientated before the last darkness trial (trial 7 – Rotated Darkness).
Data analysis
Spike sorting was performed manually using the graphical cluster-cutting software Tint (Axona) with the help of an automated clustering algorithm (Klustakwik 3.0; 16). Units having inter-spike intervals < 2 ms (refractory period), were removed due to poor isolation, as were cells with a peak firing rate <= 1 Hz. In order to prevent repeated recordings of the same cell over days, clusters that recurred on the same tetrodes in the same cluster space across recording sessions were only analyzed on the first day.
The rat’s head direction was calculated for each tracker sample from the projection of the relative position of the two LEDs onto the horizontal plane. The directional tuning for each cell was obtained by dividing the number of spikes fired when the rat faced a particular direction (in bins of 6°) by the total amount of time the rat spent facing that direction. The peak firing rate was defined as the rate in the bin with the highest rate; the angle of this bin is the cell’s preferred firing direction.
Directionality analysis
The Rayleigh vector was used to assess directional specificity, with significant directionality being assigned to cells whose Rayleigh vector score exceeded the 99th percentile of a control distribution. For the control procedure, for each cell’s trial 1 data we shifted the time of every spike by a uniform amount, chosen randomly from between 20 seconds and the recording duration minus 20 seconds; this was repeated 400 times per cell (1090 cells x 400 = 436000 rotations). The 99th percentile value came to 0.26, similar to that reported in previous HD cell studies 17,18. Thus, all cells for which the Rayleigh vector length was greater or equal to 0.26 and firing rate exceeded 1Hz were classified as HD cells. The cells selected for the study were required to reach selection criteria in both trials 1 and 5.
Because of the unexpected observation of cells that fired in two opposing directions, we adapted the above directionality analysis by using an angle-doubling procedure in which the heading angle of each spike was multiplied by two and the results plotted modulo 360°: this has the effect of converting a bi-directional distribution to a unimodal one, from which the population of directionally firing neurons could be selected using the 99th percentile criterion computed as before and equal to 0.22.
We tested whether all 360° of compass heading were represented in the directional cells we recorded by referencing the firing direction of each cell to the lemon-compartment orientation in trial 1. We then tested the non-uniformity of the distribution of angular distances with a Rayleigh test.
Selection of BD cells
We selected BD cells by defining a “flip score” above which cells were considered bi-directional, and below which they were uni-directional. Flip score was calculated with an autocorrelation procedure, by rotating the polar firing rate plot in steps of 6° and calculating the correlation between the rotated and unrotated plots at each step. The bi-directional pattern was apparent as a sinusoidal modulation of this autocorrelation with a peak at 180° (Supplementary Fig. 4). The flip score for each cell was defined as the difference between the correlations at the expected peak (180°) and the expected troughs (90°). For the entire population of directional cells this yielded two clusters (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Fig. 4), the local minimum between which – value 0.6 – was used to separate BD from HD cells. BD cells selected for the study were those that reached vector length and flip score criteria in both trials 1 and 5.
Cell isolation analysis
Cell isolation analyses were performed to rule out the hypothesis that BD cells were really two co-recorded classic HD cells with opposing tuning curves.
-
(1)
Cluster space analysis (Supplementary Fig. 5a). This analysis sought to establish that the clusters from the spikes belonging to the two individual tuning curves of BD cells were no further apart than the clusters of clearly uni-directional HD cells arbitrarily divided in two. This was based on scatterplots of the key waveform clustering parameter, which was peak-trough amplitude. For BD cells, we extracted two sub-clusters containing spikes emitted in the 180-degree range surrounding each tuning curve peak, found their center of mass (CoM) in the scatterplot cluster-space, and calculated the distance between the two CoMs. Results were compared to a control data set comprising the spikes from HD cells that had been randomly allocated to one or other of two sub-clusters; we then calculated the distance between the CoMs of these. This procedure was repeated 2000 times per cell. Data from the BD cells and the control data were compared with a two-sample t-test.
-
(2)
In a second analysis (Supplementary Fig. 5b), we calculated the probability that failure to separate the clusters of HD cells would have resulted in tuning-curve pairs that just happened to be 180° apart. To do this we randomly (with replacement) selected pairs of HD cells from the total pool, 10000 times, and for each pair we cross-correlated the tuning curves and derived the angle of the highest correlation. Then, we calculated the percentage of cells with an angular distance at 180 ± 12° (corresponding to two bins of 6°) and compared this, using a Chi-squared test, with the observed data.
-
(3)
In the last analysis, we computed the Pearson’s correlation coefficient between firing rates for the two tuning curves (Supplementary Fig. 5c) – if these were from different cells then the rates should be no more correlated than those of any two randomly selected cells. The correlation value was compared to control correlations generated by randomly selecting, with replacement, 10 000 pairs of HD cells.
Directionally color-coded spatial spike maps
Directional color-coded spike maps were constructed in order to visually display the spatial distribution of directional activity. We first defined a color map with a circular gradient of color ranging in 90° bins from blue to green to red to yellow (Fig. 1b). For each cell, we aligned the direction of blue in the color map with the peak firing bin in trial 1, with all other directions being color accordingly, and assigned each spike the appropriate color based on its associated head direction. We then generated a spatial spike plot by smoothing the path of the rat in 20 ms bins and overlying it at the appropriate places with the color-coded spikes.
Compartmental analysis
Some neurons had bi-directional tuning curves even in individual sub-compartments of the apparatus and so we investigated whether these behaved like HD cells that periodically reversed their tuning curve direction, or more like cells with simultaneous, opposing tuning curves. Analysis was performed on the two tuning curves for the whole apparatus, and also for each individual compartment on the baseline trial. We identified epochs in the recording trial when the rat faced continuously in the direction (+/- 45°) of one or other tuning curve, and then within these epochs we computed the firing rate (no. spikes divided by epoch duration), and firing rate spread (standard deviation of firing rates across epochs).
Directional activity in darkness and in the open field
Directionally modulated cells were recorded in darkness so as to determine whether activity was maintained between light and dark trials. For each cell we computed (1) the vector length and the flip score as described previously, and (2) the Pearson correlation coefficient of each cell’s directional firing rates between continuous light-dark trials 5 and 6, and between the two dark trials 6 and 7, and compared them using a Kruskal-Wallis non-parametric test.
Nine BD cells were additionally recorded in a 120 cm x 120 cm open-field after 5 experimental recording sessions. For each BD cell, we calculated the vector length and the flip score to investigate whether they share directional properties found in the two compartment apparatus.
Spatial rate maps and spatial correlation analysis
Spatial rate maps were generated by dividing the two-compartment apparatus into an array of 40 x 40 square bins, each 3 x 3 cm in size. Spikes per bin were divided by time spent in that bin to provide a firing rate (Hz). Smoothed firing rate maps were then generated following Spiers et al.17, by using a boxcar procedure in which the firing rate in each bin was replaced by that of the mean of itself plus the immediately surrounding bins (8 for central bins, 5 for edge bins and 3 for corner bins). In both raw and smoothed rate maps, pixels that were not visited by the rat were displayed in white. The firing rate of the cell is color-coded from low (light blue) to high (dark red).
To estimate the stability of the spatial activity, pixel-by-pixel cross-correlations were made on the unsmoothed data from the two compartments – the first using the original maps, and the second with one compartment rotated by 180°, in order to see whether spatial patterns reversed in the same way that the directional patterns of BD cells did.
LFP/spiking characteristics and movement correlates
For recordings from the three brain areas we looked at spiking characteristics for the five cell types (PoS HD, ADN HD, RSC HD, RSC BC-BD and RSC WC-BD) including peak firing rate and inter-spike interval (ISI) histogram.
For the ISI analysis, a histogram of ISIs with 2ms bins was generated for each cell type and the peak was taken as the center of the bin with the highest count. Inspection of the ISI histograms suggested different decay times for the different cell types so we calculated decay time by fitting, to the histogram, a one-term exponential decay function of the form y = a*exp(b*x) from the peak to peak + 1 second, using the fit function from MATLAB's Curve Fitting Toolbox. Time to half-peak was then taken as the time taken for the exponential fit to decay to half the peak value.
For retrosplenial WC-BD, BC-BD, and HD cells, ISIs were also considered only for periods of time where head direction was within +/- 45° of the preferred firing direction of the cell. For HD cells, this was taken as the location of peak firing rate in the polar plot. For BD cells, this same method was used to find one preferred firing direction, and then the other peak was found using a circular autocorrelation. For the exponential curve-fitting, the lowest-spiking 25% of all cells were excluded (those with fewer than 145 spikes occurring within +/- 45° of the peak direction for that cell).
Statistics
No statistical methods were used to pre-determine sample sizes but our sample sizes are similar to those reported for HD cells in previous studies7, 9, 10. Statistical tests included Student’s t-test, ANOVA, Pearson’s correlation, Chi-square, Rayleigh test, Mann-Whitney U, circular V-test. Data distribution was assumed to be normal but this was not formally tested.
Histology
At the completion of the experiment, rats received an overdose of pentobarbital and were perfused intracardially with 0.9% saline followed by 4% formaldehyde. The brains were removed, stored 1 day in formaldehyde, followed by 30% sucrose solution, and finally frozen with dry ice. 30- μm-thick coronal sections for ADN and RSC animals and sagittal sections for PoS animals were mounted on glass slides and stained with cresyl violet or thionine. The position of the tips of the electrodes were determined from digital pictures, acquired with an Olympus microscope (Olympus Keymed, Southend-on-Sea, U.K.) and imported into an image manipulation program (Gimp 2.8, distributed under General Public License). Recording sites were determined by measuring backwards from the deepest point of the track, and identifying with the help of the rat brain atlas from Paxinos and Watson 19.
Data and code availability
The raw and analyzed data and code that support the findings of this study are available from https://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/series/
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by grants from the Medical Research Council (G1100669) and Wellcome Trust (103896AIA) to K.J.
Footnotes
Author contributions
K.J. conceived the study and obtained funding, P.Y.J. and K.J. designed the protocol, P.Y.J. and D.O. performed surgeries and recordings, P.Y.J., L.S., G.C. and H.P. analysed data. All authors interpreted data and discussed results. P.Y.J. and K.J. wrote the manuscript. All authors commented and edited the manuscript.
Competing financial interests
KJ is a non-shareholding director of Axona Ltd
References and notes
- 1.Taube JS. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2007;30:181–207. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Taube JS, Burton HL. J Neurophysiol. 1995;74:1953–1971. doi: 10.1152/jn.1995.74.5.1953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Knierim JJ, Kudrimoti HS, McNaughton BL. J Neurosci. 1995;15:1648–1659. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-03-01648.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Auger SD, Mullally SL, Maguire EA. PLoS One. 2012;7:e43620. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0043620. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen LL, Lin LH, Green EJ, Barnes CA, McNaughton BL. Exp Brain Res. 1994;101:8–23. doi: 10.1007/BF00243212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen LL, Lin LH, Barnes CA, McNaughton BL. Exp Brain Res. 1994;101:24–34. doi: 10.1007/BF00243213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Cho J, Sharp PE. Behav Neurosci. 2001;115:3–25. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.115.1.3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sugar J, Witter MP, van Strien NM, Cappaert NLM. Front Neuroinform. 2011;5:7. doi: 10.3389/fninf.2011.00007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Taube JS, Muller RU, Ranck-JB J. J Neurosci. 1990;10:436–447. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.10-02-00436.1990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Yoganarasimha D. J Neurosci. 2006;26:622–631. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3885-05.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Cooper BG, Manka TF, Mizumori SJ. Behav Neurosci. 2001;115:1012–1028. doi: 10.1037//0735-7044.115.5.1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Pothuizen HHJ, Davies M, Albasser MM, Aggleton JP, Vann SD. Eur J Neurosci. 2009;30:877–888. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2009.06881.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Marchette SA, Vass LK, Ryan J, Epstein RA. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:1598–1606. doi: 10.1038/nn.3834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Robertson CE, Hermann KL, Mynick A, Kravitz DJ, Kanwisher N. Curr Biol. 2016;26:2463–2468. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.07.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Knight R, et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2014;369:20120512. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2012.0512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kadir SN, Goodman DFM, Harris KD. Neural Comput. 2014;26:2379–94. doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bonnevie T, et al. Nat Neurosci. 2013;16:309–17. doi: 10.1038/nn.3311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Giocomo LM, et al. Curr Biol. 2014;24:252–262. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Paxinos G, Watson C. Elsevier Acad Press. 2007;170:547–612. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jeewajee A, Barry C, O’Keefe J, Burgess N. Hippocampus. 2008;18:1175–1185. doi: 10.1002/hipo.20510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw and analyzed data and code that support the findings of this study are available from https://discover.ukdataservice.ac.uk/series/