Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2017 Jan 24;61(2):e02008-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02008-16

In Vitro Activities of Lefamulin and Other Antimicrobial Agents against Macrolide-Susceptible and Macrolide-Resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae from the United States, Europe, and China

Ken B Waites a,, Donna M Crabb a, Lynn B Duffy a, Jorgen S Jensen b, Yang Liu c, Susanne Paukner d
PMCID: PMC5278710  PMID: 27855075

ABSTRACT

Lefamulin, an investigational pleuromutilin, was tested against a collection of 18 macrolide-susceptible and 42 macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains, and the results were compared with those of azithromycin, erythromycin, tetracycline, doxycycline, and moxifloxacin testing. Lefamulin was highly active against all strains tested, with all MICs at ≤0.008 μg/ml. The lefamulin MIC90 (0.002 μg/ml) for macrolide-resistant strains was the lowest among all drugs tested. Minimum bactericidal concentrations were within 2 dilutions of the MIC values, indicating a bactericidal effect.

KEYWORDS: lefamulin, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, pleuromutilin, pneumonia, susceptibility testing

TEXT

Mycoplasma pneumoniae is an important cause of community-acquired tracheobronchitis and pneumonia in people of all ages. Historically, macrolides have been the antimicrobials of choice for these infections (1). However, treatment has become more complicated in recent years as a result of the emergence of high-level, clinically significant resistance that began in Asia in 2000 and has spread globally.

Macrolide resistance in M. pneumoniae is caused by single-base mutations in region V of the 23S rRNA gene, which is present in only one copy in the genome. Thus, one mutational event can change the susceptibility phenotype from extremely susceptible to highly resistant (2), and as mycoplasmas have high mutation rates, such mutational events can rapidly accumulate in a population where selection is taking place (3, 4). Macrolide resistance rates in M. pneumoniae now exceed 95% in Beijing, China (5). In Europe, prevalence varies, with recent reports of 1.6% in Denmark (6), 3.6% in Germany (7), 9.8% in France (8), 19% in Scotland (9), 26% in Italy (10), and 30% in Israel (11). In the United States, macrolide resistance has been reported in 13% of M. pneumoniae-positive specimens (12). Given the rapid spread of macrolide resistance, alternative therapies for which there is no cross-resistance are urgently needed, particularly for children, for whom tetracyclines and quinolones are not recommended and macrolide resistance has been most commonly reported.

Pleuromutilin antibiotics inhibit bacterial growth by binding to the peptidyl transferase center of the 50S ribosomal subunit, blocking protein synthesis, and have been used to treat mycoplasmal respiratory infections in swine and poultry for decades. Lefamulin (BC-3781) is a new semisynthetic pleuromutilin with potent activity against various Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, including multidrug-resistant strains (13, 14), and is currently in clinical development by Nabriva Therapeutics for treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia. A previous study reported potent activity of lefamulin (MIC90, 0.006 μg/ml) against 50 M. pneumoniae isolates from Germany, where macrolide resistance rates are low, but these organisms were not actually tested against macrolides for comparison (15).

We evaluated in vitro susceptibilities and bactericidal activities of lefamulin against a collection of 60 M. pneumoniae strains that included 3 reference strains originally obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) (P1 1428 [ATCC 29085], M 129-B7 [ATCC 29342], and MAC [ATCC 15492]), 15 macrolide-susceptible clinical isolates initially obtained between 1980 and 2014, and 42 macrolide-resistant clinical isolates initially obtained between 1991 and 2013. Among the 57 clinical isolates, 22 were from the United States, 2 from England, 6 from Denmark, 2 from Germany, and 25 from China. Clinical isolates were obtained from culture collections at the University of Alabama at Birmingham (UAB) Diagnostic Mycoplasma Laboratory in Birmingham, Alabama; the Statens Serum Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark; and the Fudan University Institute of Antibiotics in Shanghai, China. Most of them were recovered from the upper or lower respiratory tracts of children. Both major P1 subtypes (I and II) were represented in the reference strains and among macrolide-susceptible and -resistant clinical isolates. Macrolide-resistant isolates included organisms that contained the A2058G or A2059G rRNA mutation (Escherichia coli numbering) conferring macrolide resistance.

MIC testing was performed at the UAB Diagnostic Mycoplasma Laboratory and the Statens Serum Institut.

M. pneumoniae isolates derived from adults and children were stored at −80°C until tested. For MIC determination, an aliquot was thawed and diluted in SP4 broth to yield a final inoculum of ∼104 to 105 CFU/ml, which was then used to inoculate 96-well microtiter plates.

Antimicrobial agents obtained in powdered form of known purity were dissolved and diluted in accordance with their respective manufacturer's instructions. Lefamulin was provided by Nabriva Therapeutics (Vienna, Austria). Comparator agents were azithromycin (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, and Groton Laboratories, Pfizer Inc., Groton, CT), erythromycin (Sigma-Aldrich), tetracycline (Sigma-Aldrich), doxycycline (Sigma-Aldrich), moxifloxacin (TSZ Chem, Waltham, MA), and solithromycin (Tecoland Corporation, Irvine, CA).

MICs were determined in accordance with Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guideline M43-A using the broth microdilution technique (16). Microdilution plates were incubated aerobically at 37°C and examined daily for color change in the growth control wells. MICs were recorded as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial inhibiting color change in SP4 broth at the time the growth control well demonstrated a color change from pink to yellow, indicative of glucose metabolism. The mycoplasmacidal concentration (MBC) for lefamulin was determined for 2 isolates of macrolide-susceptible M. pneumoniae and 6 of macrolide-resistant strains. A volume of 30 μl of fluid was pipetted from the growth control well and test wells of the broth microdilution MIC system that did not show color change at the time the growth control first showed color change and was inoculated into 2.97 ml of broth to dilute the antibiotic beyond the MIC. Broths were incubated for at least twice the time necessary to determine the MIC. The MBC was defined as the lowest concentration of antimicrobial at which there was no evidence of broth color change after prolonged incubation. Positive and negative controls consisted of tetracycline (bacteriostatic) and moxifloxacin (bactericidal). When the MBC was ≥3 dilutions greater than the MIC, the drug was considered bacteriostatic. MBCs of ≤2 dilutions greater than the MIC were considered bactericidal (17).

Lefamulin demonstrated potent activity against all M. pneumoniae strains tested with MIC values of ≤0.008 μg/ml. MIC50 and MIC90 values of 18 macrolide-susceptible and 42 macrolide-resistant subsets were ≤0.001/≤0.001 μg/ml and 0.002/0.002 μg/ml, respectively (Tables 1 and 2). No difference was observed in lefamulin susceptibility according to the 23 S rRNA mutations conferring macrolide resistance. Furthermore, lefamulin MICs were similar for isolates of both P1 subtypes (I and II). Overall, the lefamulin activity was comparable to that of azithromycin against the macrolide-susceptible subset (MIC50/90, ≤0.001/≤0.001 μg/ml). All isolates were susceptible to moxifloxacin (MIC50/90, 0.125/0.25 μg/ml) and tetracycline (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml) when CLSI breakpoints were applied (16).

TABLE 1.

MIC distribution in M. pneumoniae isolates

Antimicrobial agent No. of isolates No. of isolates with MIC (μg/ml) of:
≤0.001 0.002 0.004 0.008 0.016 0.032 0.064 0.12 0.25 0.5 1 2 4 8 16 32 >32
Lefamulin 60 36 21 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    Macrolide-susceptible isolates 18 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
    Macrolide-resistant isolates 42 18 21 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Azithromycin 60 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 7 19 10
Erythromycin 50 0 0 5 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 36
Solithromycin 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tetraycycline 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 35 12 0 0 0 0 0 0
Doxycycline 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Moxifloxacin 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 40 10 0 0 0 0 0 0

TABLE 2.

MIC50/90 and range for M. pneumoniae isolates

Antimicrobial agent No. of isolates MIC (μg/ml)
MIC50 MIC90 Range
M. pneumoniae, total
    Lefamulin 60 ≤0.001 0.002 ≤0.001 to 0.008
    Azithromycin 60 16 >32 ≤0.001 to >32
    Erythromycin 50 >32 >32 0.004 to >32
    Solithromycin 10 0.25 0.5 ≤0.001 to 0.5
    Moxifloxacin 50 0.125 0.25 0.063 to 0.25
    Tetracycline 50 0.5 1 0.25 to 1
    Doxycycline 10 0.12 0.25 0.12 to 0.25
Macrolide-susceptible M. pneumoniae
    Lefamulin 18 ≤0.001 ≤0.001 ≤0.001
    Azithromycin 18 ≤0.001 ≤0.001 ≤0.001
    Erythromycin 14 0.008 0.008 0.004 to 0.008
    Solithromycin 4 NAa NA ≤0.001
    Moxifloxacin 14 0.125 0.25 0.063 to 0.25
    Tetracycline 14 0.5 1 0.25 to 1
    Doxycycline 4 NA NA 0.12
Macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae
    Lefamulin 42 0.002 0.002 ≤0.001 to 0.008
    Azithromycin 42 32 >32 2 to >32
    Erythromycin 36 >32 >32 >32
    Solithromycin 6 NA NA 0.25 to 0.5
    Moxifloxacin 36 0.125 0.25 0.125 to 0.25
    Tetracycline 36 0.5 1 0.25 to 1
    Doxycycline 6 NA NA 0.12 to 0.25
a

NA, not applicable.

Ten isolates were tested at Statens Serum Institute for the investigational ketolide solithromycin, which is known to have potent activity against M. pneumoniae, including macrolide-resistant organisms, even though MICs are usually several dilutions higher than those for macrolide-susceptible organisms (18). Solithromycin MICs for 4 macrolide-susceptible isolates were ≤0.001 μg/ml, whereas those for 6 macrolide-resistant isolates were 0.25 to 0.5 μg/ml, consistent with previous reports (18).

Lefamulin MBCs for 2 macrolide-susceptible and 6 macrolide-resistant isolates for which MICs ranged from 0.0005 to 0.002 μg/ml were within 2 2-fold dilutions of the MIC. This indicates that lefamulin is bactericidal against M. pneumoniae.

This is the first evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of the new pleuromutilin lefamulin relative to other antimicrobials in a collection of M. pneumoniae isolates from diverse geographic regions that included organisms with high-level macrolide resistance. In addition to its potent activity against all M. pneumoniae strains tested, another significant advantage of lefamulin is its bactericidal effect. Among other drug classes with activity against M. pneumoniae, only fluoroquinolones have been shown to be bactericidal thus far (19). Use of bactericidal agents is particularly important in immunosuppressed people who are prone to develop systemic infections due to Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma species, which are sometimes resistant to antimicrobials. In such patients, bacteriostatic agents such as macrolides or tetracyclines may prove ineffective (19). Successful treatment of systemic infections caused by Mycoplasma and Ureaplasma species in people with primary antibody deficiency with the veterinary pleuromutilin valnemulin has been reported (20).

Development of valnemulin resistance in the swine pathogens Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Mycoplasma hyosynoviae was slow during passage in subinhibitory concentrations of this compound (21). This finding was supported by the finding that for the avian species Mycoplasma gallisepticum, two or three mutational events in the 23S rRNA gene were needed in order to reach valnemulin MICs that may be considered resistant (22). These involved the major macrolide resistance-mediating mutations in positions 2058 and 2059 (E. coli numbering), which are also the major determinants for azithromycin resistance in M. pneumoniae (19). Thus, it is very encouraging that, although both of the common macrolide resistance-mediating mutations A2058G and A2059G were present among the macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae strains tested in this study, potent activity of lefamulin was still observed (data not shown).

In conclusion, this study has shown that lefamulin is very active in vitro against M. pneumoniae, with potency comparable to that of azithromycin, and had the additional advantage of bactericidal activity. Its potency against macrolide-resistant M. pneumoniae was superior to that of all other classes of antimicrobials tested. Accordingly, lefamulin might be an effective option for treatment of M. pneumoniae infections and deserves further study.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This study was sponsored by Nabriva Therapeutics AG (Vienna, Austria, and King of Prussia, PA).

The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Statens Serum Institut, and the Institute of Antibiotics at Huashan Hospital received grants from Nabriva to conduct the study.

K.B.W., D.M.C., and L.B.D. are employees of the University of Alabama at Birmingham. J.S. is an employee at the Statens Serum Institut. Y.L. is an employee of the Institute of Antibiotics at Huashan Hospital. S.P. is an employee of Nabriva Therapeutics and owns Nabriva stocks/stock options.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Waites KB, Talkington DF. 2004. Mycoplasma pneumoniae and its role as a human pathogen. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:697–728. doi: 10.1128/CMR.17.4.697-728.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lucier TS, Heitzman K, Liu SK, Hu PC. 1995. Transition mutations in the 23S rRNA of erythromycin-resistant isolates of Mycoplasma pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:2770–2773. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.12.2770. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bebear C, Pereyre S, Peuchant O. 2011. Mycoplasma pneumoniae: susceptibility and resistance to antibiotics. Future Microbiol 6:423–431. doi: 10.2217/fmb.11.18. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Woese CR, Stackebrandt E, Ludwig W. 1984. What are mycoplasmas: the relationship of tempo and mode in bacterial evolution. J Mol Evol 21:305–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhao F, Liu G, Wu J, Cao B, Tao X, He L, Meng F, Zhu L, Lv M, Yin Y, Zhang J. 2013. Surveillance of macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in Beijing, China, from 2008 to 2012. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:1521–1523. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02060-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Yamamoto T, Kida Y, Sakamoto Y, Kuwano K. 2016. Mpn491, a secreted nuclease of Mycoplasma pneumoniae, plays a critical role in evading killing by neutrophil extracellular traps. Cell Microbiol. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12666. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dumke R, Luck C, Jacobs E. 2013. Low rate of macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae strains in Germany between 2009 and 2012. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:3460. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00706-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Pereyre S, Touati A, Petitjean-Lecherbonnier J, Charron A, Vabret A, Bebear C. 2013. The increased incidence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae in France in 2011 was polyclonal, mainly involving M. pneumoniae type 1 strains. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E212–E217. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Ferguson GD, Gadsby NJ, Henderson SS, Hardie A, Kalima P, Morris AC, Hill AT, Cunningham S, Templeton KE. 2013. Clinical outcomes and macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in Scotland, UK. J Med Microbiol 62:1876–1882. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.066191-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cardinale F, Chironna M, Dumke R, Binetti A, Daleno C, Sallustio A, Valzano A, Esposito S. 2011. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae in paediatric pneumonia. Eur Respir J 37:1522–1524. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00172510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Averbuch D, Hidalgo-Grass C, Moses AE, Engelhard D, Nir-Paz R. 2011. Macrolide resistance in Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Israel, 2010. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1079–1082. doi: 10.3201/eid/1706.101558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zheng X, Lee S, Selvarangan R, Qin X, Tang YW, Stiles J, Hong T, Todd K, Ratliff AE, Crabb DM, Xiao L, Atkinson TP, Waites KB. 2015. Macrolide-resistant Mycoplasma pneumoniae, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 21:1470–1472. doi: 10.3201/eid2108.150273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Paukner S, Sader HS, Ivezic-Schoenfeld Z, Jones RN. 2013. Antimicrobial activity of the pleuromutilin antibiotic BC-3781 against bacterial pathogens isolated in the SENTRY antimicrobial surveillance program in 2010. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:4489–4495. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00358-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mendes RE, Farrell DJ, Flamm RK, Talbot GH, Ivezic-Schoenfeld Z, Paukner S, Sader HS. 2016. In vitro activity of lefamulin tested against Streptococcus pneumoniae with defined serotypes, including multidrug-resistant isolates causing lower respiratory tract infections in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 60:4407–4411. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00627-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sader HS, Paukner S, Ivezic-Schoenfeld Z, Biedenbach DJ, Schmitz FJ, Jones RN. 2012. Antimicrobial activity of the novel pleuromutilin antibiotic BC-3781 against organisms responsible for community-acquired respiratory tract infections (CARTIs). J Antimicrob Chemother 67:1170–1175. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2011. Methods for Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of human mycoplasmas; approved guideline. CLSI document M43-A. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Waites KB, Bebear CM, Robertson JA, Talkington DF, Kenny GE. 2001. Cumitech 34, laboratory diagnosis of mycoplasmal infections. In Nolte FS. (coordinating ed) ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Waites KB, Crabb DM, Duffy LB. 2009. Comparative in vitro susceptibilities of human mycoplasmas and ureaplasmas to a new investigational ketolide, CEM-101. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:2139–2141. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00090-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Waites KB, Lysynyansky I, Bebear CM. 2014. Emerging antimicrobial resistance in mycoplasmas of humans and animals, p 289–322. In Browning G, Citti C (ed), Mollicutes molecular biology and pathogenesis. Caister Academic Press, Norfolk, UK. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Heilmann C, Jensen L, Jensen JS, Lundstrom K, Windsor D, Windsor H, Webster D. 2001. Treatment of resistant mycoplasma infection in immunocompromised patients with a new pleuromutilin antibiotic. J Infect 43:234–238. doi: 10.1053/jinf.2001.0910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Hannan PC, Windsor HM, Ripley PH. 1997. In vitro susceptibilities of recent field isolates of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae and Mycoplasma hyosynoviae to valnemulin (Econor), tiamulin and enrofloxacin and the in vitro development of resistance to certain antimicrobial agents in Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae. Res Vet Sci 63:157–160. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(97)90010-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Li BB, Shen JZ, Cao XY, Wang Y, Dai L, Huang SY, Wu CM. 2010. Mutations in 23S rRNA gene associated with decreased susceptibility to tiamulin and valnemulin in Mycoplasma gallisepticum. FEMS Microbiol Lett 308:144–149. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2010.02003.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES