Skip to main content
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy logoLink to Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
. 2017 Jan 24;61(2):e01756-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01756-16

Using In Vitro Dynamic Models To Evaluate Fluoroquinolone Activity against Emergence of Resistant Salmonella enterica Serovar Typhimurium

Seung-Jin Lee a, Elias Gebru Awji b, Na-hye Park a, Seung-Chun Park a,
PMCID: PMC5278752  PMID: 27895011

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to determine pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices of fluoroquinolones that minimize the emergence of resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium (S. Typhimurium) using in vitro dynamic models and to establish mechanisms of resistance. Three fluoroquinolones, difloxacin (DIF), enrofloxacin (ENR), and marbofloxacin (MAR), at five dose levels and 3 days of treatment were simulated. Bacterial killing-regrowth kinetics and emergence of resistant bacteria after antibacterial drug exposure were quantified. PK/PD indices associated with different levels of antibacterial activity were computed. Mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance were determined by analyzing target mutations in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) and by analyzing overexpression of efflux pumps. Maximum losses in susceptibility of fluoroquinolone-exposed S. Typhimurium occurred at a simulated AUC/MIC ratio (area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h in the steady state divided by the MIC) of 47 to 71. Target mutations in gyrA (S83F) and overexpression of acrAB-tolC contributed to decreased susceptibility in fluoroquinolone-exposed S. Typhimurium. The current data suggest AUC/MIC (AUC/mutant prevention concentration [MPC])-dependent selection of resistant mutants of S. Typhimurium, with AUC/MPC ratios of 69 (DIF), 62 (ENR), and 39 (MAR) being protective against selection of resistant mutants. These values could not be achieved in veterinary clinical areas under the current recommended therapeutic doses of the fluoroquinolones, suggesting the need to reassess the current dosing regimen to include both clinical efficacy and minimization of emergence of resistant bacteria.

KEYWORDS: efflux pumps, fluoroquinolone, global regulator, in vitro dynamic model, mutant prevention concentration, PK/PD integration, Salmonella Typhimurium, target mutation, acrAB-tolC, gyrA

INTRODUCTION

Fluoroquinolones are synthetic antibacterial agents with broad-spectrum, concentration-dependent bactericidal activity against a wide range of pathogens (1). However, resistance of human and animal pathogenic bacteria to a wide spectrum of antibacterial agents, including fluoroquinolones, is an increasing concern globally (2, 3). Furthermore, overuse or inappropriate use of antibiotics in animals, especially food-producing animals, can lead to transfer of bacterial resistance to humans via the food chain (4).

A common method for assessing the efficacy of antibacterial drugs focuses on evaluation of the effect of selected doses of the drug on the reduction in the total bacterial number at the infection site, with less attention to the amplification of drug-resistant subpopulations of bacteria by selective pressure (5, 6). However, a number of studies have accentuated the importance of a mutant prevention concentration (MPC)-based dosing approaches to enhance the potency of antibiotics and restrict the selection of resistant mutants (7, 8). Furthermore, in vitro dynamic models that mimic antibacterial pharmacokinetics in vivo have been applied to bridge the gap between static in vitro data and the dynamic time course profiles. These models have been used to establish the relationship between fluoroquinolone exposure and emergence of resistant bacteria in humans, as well as to compare the potential of different drugs within the same class for restricting the selection of resistant mutants of bacteria (7, 9).

The aim of this study was to apply the MPC and in vitro dynamic model-based approaches to determine pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices of fluoroquinolones that minimize the emergence of resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. We chose to investigate S. Typhimurium because of its zoonotic significance and the high level of drug resistance reported for this organism across the globe (1012). Loss of susceptibility in laboratory and field S. Typhimurium isolates was associated with inappropriate use of fluoroquinolones (12). We investigated veterinary fluoroquinolones, including difloxacin (DIF), enrofloxacin (ENR), and marbofloxacin (MAR), for two reasons: first, the risk of cross-resistance for fluoroquinolones has been reported for both human and animal pathogens (3, 4, 1315), and second, previous studies have demonstrated differences among veterinary fluoroquinolones in their activity and potential for selection of resistant mutants of bacteria (16). We further investigated the major mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance, including target mutations as well as the expression of the efflux pumps and global regulators, and established the relationships between these mechanisms and reduction in fluoroquinolone susceptibility.

(Part of this study was presented at the 13th International Congress of the European Association for Veterinary Pharmacology and Toxicology, 19 to 22 July 2015 [17]).

RESULTS

Antibacterial activity.

The pharmacodynamic profile of FQs against S. Typhimurium clinical isolates from pigs and a standard strain (ATCC 14028) were determined in vitro. As shown in Table 1, ENR and MAR had comparable activity, which was higher than that of DIF. MPC50 and MPC90 concentrations were 4-fold (DIF) and 2-fold (ENR and MAR) higher than the respective MIC50 and MIC90 values. These data suggested that ENR and MAR have a slightly higher potency than DIF.

TABLE 1.

Antibacterial activity of three fluoroquinolones against S. Typhimurium isolates from pigs

Parameter and isolate type Value (μg/ml) for:
DIF ENR MAR
Clinical isolates (n) 16 16 16
    MIC (μg/ml)
        Range 0.13–8 0.03–2 0.03–2
        MIC50 1 0.25 0.13
        MIC90 4 2 1
    Ra (%) 31.25 12.50 6.25
    MPC (μg/ml)
        Range 0.50–16 0.13–4 0.13–4
        MPC50 2 0.50 0.50
        MPC90 8 4 4
    MPC/MIC
        Range 4–8 4–8 4
        (MPC/MIC)50 4 4 4
        (MPC/MIC)90 8 8 4
ATCC 14028b
    MIC 0.13 0.03 0.03
    MPC 0.50 0.13 0.13
    MIC/MPC 4 4 4
a

R (%), percent resistance in clinical isolates using the breakpoint of ciprofloxacin from the CLSI (M100-S23).

b

The control strain used in the present study.

Kill-regrowth analysis.

The time course of killing and regrowth of S. Typhimurium incubated in the presence of one of the FQs at five different constantly changing concentrations was evaluated (Fig. 1). The antimicrobial activities of DIF, ENR, and MAR were evaluated at a range of AUC/MIC ratios (areas under the concentration-time curve over 24 h in the steady state divided by the MIC), including those achievable at the clinically recommended doses of all drugs, against S. Typhimurium. An increase in AUC/MIC ratio resulted in a decrease in the numbers of surviving pathogens. The intensity of the antimicrobial effect (IE) versus AUC/MIC plots shows differences among the 3 FQs (Fig. 2). For example, at an AUC/MIC ratio of 125, which is the proposed AUC/MIC target for predicting the activity of FQs (18), the IE of MAR was 55% and 29% greater than those of DIF and ENR, respectively, suggesting the greatest antimicrobial effect of a given AUC/MIC ratio of MAR against S. Typhimurium.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Time courses of killing and regrowth kinetics for S. Typhimurium strain exposed to a 72-h course of difloxacin (DIF), enrofloxacin (ENR), and marbofloxacin (MAR). Values at the right side of each panel indicate the simulated AUC/MIC ratios and TMSW. Arrows indicate fluoroquinolone dosing.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

AUC/MIC-dependent antibacterial effect of difloxacin (DIF), enrofloxacin (ENR), and marbofloxacin (MAR) against S. Typhimurium, fitted by equation 1. For DIF, Ymax = 386.3, dx = 2.617, and x0 = 0.5054 (R2 = 0.99); for ENR, Ymax = 382.0, dx = 2.462, and x0 = 0.4494 (R2 = 1); for MAR, Ymax = 481.8, dx = 2.486, and x0 = 0.5196 (R2 = 0.97).

Emergence of resistance.

The MIC values measured after each dosing (at 24, 48, and 72 h) were normalized to the initial (0 h) MIC, and the relationship between MIC changes and simulated AUC/MIC or AUC/MPC ratios was analyzed by using a mathematical equation. As shown in Fig. 3A, the maximum loss in susceptibility (about 8-fold MIC increase for MAR and 16-fold MIC increase for DIF and ENR), which is the central point in the curve, was observed at AUC/MIC ratios of 47 (MAR; R2 = 0.98), 63 (ENR; R2 = 0.62), and 71 (DIF; R2 = 0.83). No loss in susceptibility was observed at the lowest (13, 18, and 20) and highest (211, 290, and 314) simulated AUC/MIC ratios for MAR, ENR, and DIF. The estimated AUC/MPC values that may protect the selection of resistant S. Typhimurium were 69 (DIF), 62 (ENR), and 39 (MAR). The IE-versus-resistance relationship was also analyzed using equation 2. As shown in Fig. 3B, a bell-shaped function describes this relationship, with the highest MIC increases observed at an IE value of 112 for DIF (range, 96 to 132; R2 = 0.76), 106 for ENR (range, 84 to 133; R2 = 0.60), and 134 for MAR (range, 119 to 151; R2 = 0.87).

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Changes in susceptibility of S. Typhimurium. (A) Effect of AUC24/MIC ratio (top) or AUC24/MPC ratio (bottom) on the susceptibility of S. Typhimurium strains exposed to difloxacin (DIF), enrofloxacin (ENR), and marbofloxacin (MAR). Data were fitted by equation 2. (Top) For DIF, a = 12.92, xc = 1.85, and b = 0.18; for ENR, a = 8.82, xc = 1.8, and b = 0.21; for MAR, a = 7.32, xc = 1.67, and b = 0.18. (Bottom) For DIF, a = 12.92, xc = 1.25, and b = 0.18; for ENR, a = 8.82, xc = 1.19, and b = 0.21; for MAR, a = 7.32, xc = 1.07, and b = 0.18. (B) Resistance of S. Typhimurium related to the intensity of the antibacterial effect (IE). Data were fitted by equation 2. For DIF, a = 14.27, xc = 2.05, b = 0.0.22, and R2 = 0.76; for ENR, a = 10.85, xc = 2.03, b = 0.26, and R2 = 0.60; for MAR, a = 6.63, xc = 2.13, b = 0.22, and R2 = 0.87. (C) Resistance of S. Typhimurium related to the simulated AUC24/MPC ratio (left) or Cmax/MPC ratio (right) of three fluoroquinolones (3FQs; combined data). Data were fitted by equation 2. (Left) a = 9.52, xc = 1.20, and b = 0.18; (right) a = 9.81, xc = −0.02, and b = 0.21.

Similar patterns of the AUC/MIC-dependent changes in the susceptibility of S. Typhimurium to DIF, ENR, and MAR could allow establishment of a generalized relationship between MIC increase and AUC/MIC ratios of FQs. Therefore, combined data for MIC changes over a 3-day course of FQ treatment with DIF, ENR, and MAR were integrated with combined AUC/MPC and Cmax/MPC (the maximum concentration of drug in serum divided by the MPC) values. As shown in Fig. 3C, no losses in susceptibility were observed when the combined AUC/MPC ratio was >38.3 and the Cmax/MPC ratio was >2.6. This AUC/MPC value was greater than the individual values for MAR (1.4-fold) but less than that for DIF (1.8-fold) or ENR (1.6-fold).

Population dynamics of fluoroquinolone treatment.

To ensure the residual activity of the drugs during the experiment, bioassays were conducted using filtrates taken from the culture medium, and MIC values of filtrates against the parent strain were converted to real-time drug residues in continuous culture. As shown in Fig. 4A, the MIC estimates of the filtrates slightly decreased with time. However, these values were less (only by 1- to 3-fold) than the anticipated drug concentration at a rate equal to the flow, suggesting density-dependent decay does not fully explain the failure of the simulated FQ concentration to clear the bacteria in the continuous culture.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Population dynamics of fluoroquinolone treatment. (A) Bioassay estimates of the MICs of DIF, ENR, and MAR during 3-day continuous culture. The culture medium was taken from the central vessel every 4 h. After removing the bacteria through filtration, MIC values were checked with the S. Typhimurium standard strain. LO, fluoroquinolone treatment with AUC/MIC ratio of 53 to 78; HI, fluoroquinolone treatment with AUC/MIC ratio of 211 to 314. (B) Biofilm formation of S. Typhimurium following daily dosing with difoxacin, enrofloxacin, or difloxacin. At the end of the experiment (72 h), the culture vessel compartments were separated, and biofilm strains in the vessel were washed and suspended with PBS or MHB II with or without sonication. Mean viable cell densities of bacteria released from the walls of the culture vessels were counted. N/T, no antibiotic treatment; LO, treatment at AUC/MIC ratio of 53 to 78; HI, treatment with at AUC/MIC ratio of 211 to 314; WO, the densities of bacteria in PBS following the third wash with PBS; P/S, the densities estimated in MHB II prior to sonication; A/S-1 m or 30 m, the densities estimated in MHB II with sonication for 1 or 30 min. Three independent estimates of densities were made for each sample. (C) Simulation of fluoroquinolone treatment with parameter A with 72 h of continuous culture of S. Typhimurium, showing changes in viable cell density with fluoroquinolone concentration. A dose of ENR (AUC/MIC of ENR, 63 [left]; AUC/MPC of ENR, 62 [middle]; AUC/MPC of three fluoroquinolones, 38 [right]) administered every 24 h starting with a cell density of 108. Standard parameters and their definitions are as described in Levin and Udekwu (20), with the following additions and changes in parameters: initA = 8, 31, or 20 μg; initN = 1e8; initR = 1; initD = 0; init P = 0; initB = 0; initM (density of mutant population) = 0; psimax = 1; psimin = −2; psimaxp = 0.001; psiminp = −0.01; psimaxb = 0.001; psiminb = −0.00001; psimaxm (maximum growth rate, mutant population) = 1; psiminm = −3; Mmin = 1.875; Mmax = 1.875; pd = 0; cr = 0.9; k = 2.261; e = 5e−7; kr = 0.25; kmax = 1e7; w = 3.9; wb = 0.0001; wm (flow rate of mutant population) = w; C = 500; f = 0; yp = 0.0001; yd = 0.00001; yb = 0.000001; yw = 0.0000001; ym (rate at which mutations occur in NT) = 0.000000001; ddx = 0.01; dv = 1e−9; dk = 1e−9. A1, antibiotic decay; N1, density of viable planktonic sensitive bacteria; P1, density of planktonic persistent bacteria; B1, density of the wall (biofilm) population; M1, density of mutant population; NT, total viable planktonic bacteria. The simulation was run by the Berkeley Madonna program, accessed from http://www.eclf.net.

The number of biofilm-forming bacteria was estimated from washes of the culture vessels before and after sonicating the vessels to release bacteria adhering to the walls. As shown in Fig. 4B, both the total population and subpopulation of bacteria recovered from the walls of the culture vessels were lower in cultures with drug, especially at the highest AUC/MIC ratios (314, 290, and 211 h for DIF, ENR, and MAR) compared with control cultures, suggesting AUC/MIC-dependent inhibition of biofilm formation in S. Typhimurium.

In order to predict and replicate the population dynamics of the treated continuous culture, a previously described mathematical model was used with hypothetical strains after expanding the equation to include an emerging mutant subpopulation (1921). Figure 5C shows the changes in populations of the hypothetical weakly biofilm-forming strain in the presence of density-dependent decay at the effective concentrations of the FQ based on an AUC/MIC ratio for ENR of 63, AUC/MPC ratio for ENR of 62, and AUC/MPC ratio for three FQs of 38. There was maximal loss in susceptibility (Fig. 4C, left), similar to the continuous culture experiment (Fig. 1), whereas the selection of resistance was low (Fig. 4C, middle and right). These simulations show FQ AUC/MIC (AUC/MPC)-dependent anti-Salmonella activity similar to our earlier results, and the activity against selection of resistant Salmonella between ENR and three FQs combined was comparable.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

mRNA expression levels of efflux pump (A) and regulator genes (B) for in vitro isolates and clinical isolates (C) of S. Typhimurium. Strains were randomly selected from the dynamic model treated with MAR at the end of the experiment (72 h). Strains D1 to D5 were isolated from cultures treated with AUC/MPC ratios of 3.3, 6.7, 13.2, 26.3, and 52.7, respectively. Data represent the means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments. Bars with different letters (a to e) show significant differences between groups (P < 0.05).

Mechanisms of resistance.

Mechanisms of resistance in clinical isolates and in vitro-selected resistant mutants of S. Typhimurium were elucidated (Table 2). As the highest fold increases in MICs were observed after repeat dosing, selections of representative first-step mutants were made from cultures after the last dosing (72 h). Eight to 32 mutant strains were recovered from selective plates. Five colonies per plate from each dose level were selected for MIC determination. A representative colony showing the highest stable MIC increases by repeat MIC determinations then was selected per dose level for further phenotype and genotype assays. These isolates (designated STM-D1, -D2, -D3, and -D4) from cultures with AUC/MPC ratios of 9 to 72, isolates from the MPC plates of MAR, as well as 6 to 31% of clinical isolates (Table 1) had increased MICs (2- to 64-fold increases) for one or more of the FQs. MIC increases were transferable between FQs. This is in accordance with our previous findings in which losses in susceptibility of Escherichia coli exposed to one FQ were transferable to other FQs and even to structurally unrelated drugs, partly due to activation of global drug efflux pumps (16, 22). To confirm the contribution of efflux pump activity to this resistance, MICs were assessed in the presence of the efflux pump inhibitor phenylalanine-arginine-β-naphthylamide (PAβN). The MICs of the three FQs decreased by 2- to 8-fold in the presence of PAβN, indicating the involvement of efflux pumps for the observed resistance. Therefore, overexpression of the efflux transporter gene and global regulators was further evaluated by quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). As shown in Fig. 5A, expression of acrAB-tolC mRNA increased in isolates STM-D2 and -D3 exposed to FQ AUC/MPC ratios of 6.7 and 13.2 (P < 0.05), while no drug exposure-related differences in acrAB-tolC expression were observed in isolates STM-D1, -D4, and -D5 exposed to FQ AUC/MPC ratios of 3.3, 26.3, and 52.7, respectively. Overexpression of global regulatory genes was also significantly increased at 72 h in isolates from the dynamic model, with AUC/MPC ratios of 6.7 and 13.2 increasing by up to 2- to 3-fold (marA), 3- to 3.5-fold (soxS), 5- to 10-fold (ramA), and 6- to 7-fold (rob) compared to that of the original strain, suggesting a positive correlation between gene expression of acrAB-tolC and its regulators (Fig. 5B), and the expression of acrAB-tolC in the STM-D3 strain was similar to that in STM-isolate-15 (P < 0.05), showing resistance (Fig. 5C).

TABLE 2.

Fluoroquinolone resistance phenotypes and amino acid substitutions in in vitro-selected mutants and clinical isolates of S. Typhimurium

Strain Fluoroquinolone MIC (μg/ml)a
Mutation
DIF DIFEPI ENR ENREPI MAR MAREPI gyrA gyrB parC parE
Parental strain
    STM-st 0.13 <0.03 0.03 <0.03 0.03 <0.03 WT WT WT WT
Single-step mutant from the dynamic modelb
    STM-D2 4 2 1.00 1 0.50 1 S83F WT WT WT
    STM-D3 2 2 4 2 2 1 S83F WT WT WT
    STM-D4 1.00 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.50 0.25 S83F WT WT WT
    STM-D5 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.06 WT WT WT WT
Single-step mutant from MPC plates
    STM-mu-p1 1 0.25 0.50 0.25 0.50 0.25 S83F WT WT WT
Resistant clinical strains
    STM-isol-2 0.25 0.06 0.06 0.03 0.03 <0.03 WT WT WT WT
    STM-isol-11 0.50 0.25 0.25 0.06 0.25 0.06 D87Y WT WT WT
    STM-isol-15 4 0.5 2 0.25 2 0.25 D87Y WT WT WT
a

The MIC values were checked in the presence of 40 µg/ml of Phe-Arg-β-naphthylamide (PAβN), which is an efflux pump inhibitor (EPI).

b

Representative single-step mutants were selected randomly from the dynamic model with AUC/MPC ratios of 6.7 (STM-D2), 13.2 (STM-D3), 26.3 (STM-D4), and 52.7 (STM-D5) with MAR.

Mutation in the quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs) was also examined. Fully quinolone-susceptible strains had no mutations in the target genes. A single gyrA mutation with S83F was present in in vitro-selected resistant isolates but not in resistant clinical isolates (D87Y). No mutations were found in gyrB, parC, and parE in any strains. Interestingly, in vitro-selected isolates showed multiple mechanisms of resistance, including mutation and efflux pump overexpression, while in clinically resistant isolates, resistance was mainly attributed to target mutation.

Relationships of MPC with pharmacokinetics.

In vitro pharmacodynamic data from the present study (MICs and MPCs) and published pharmacokinetic information of the three FQs in pigs (AUC and Cmax) were integrated to evaluate whether PK/PD indices by conventional dosing regimen of FQs agree with the protective AUC/MIC or AUC/MPC ratios obtained in the present study (Table 3).

TABLE 3.

Pharmacodynamic predictors of fluoroquinolone activity based on integration of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices against S. Typhimurium clinical isolates

Parameters Value for antibacterial agent
DIF ENR
MAR
Low dose High dose
Pharmacokinetic parametersa
    Dose (mg/kg) 5.00 2.50 10.00 2.00
    AUC (μg/ml) 32.12 6.82 10.07 10.95
    Cmax (μg/ml) 2.56 1.42 1.82 0.98
    tmax (h) 1.32 4.99 3.79 2.11
    t1/2β (h) 18.09 6.56 10.68 7.80
PK/PD integration based on MIC breakpointb
    AUC/MICBPs 513.92 109.12 161.12 175.20
    AUC/MICBPi 32.12 6.82 10.07 10.95
    AUC/MICBPr 16.06 3.41 5.04 5.48
    Cmax/MICBPs 40.96 22.72 29.12 15.68
    Cmax/MICBPi 2.56 1.42 1.82 0.98
    Cmax/MICBPr 1.28 0.71 0.91 0.49
PK/PD integration based on MIC of all clinical isolatesc
    AUC/MIC50 32.12 27.28 40.28 84.23
    AUC/MIC90 8.03 3.41 5.04 10.95
    Cmax/MIC50 2.56 5.68 7.28 7.54
    Cmax/MIC90 0.64 0.71 0.91 0.98
PK/PD integration based on MPCs of susceptible isolatesd
    AUC/MPC50 32.12 27.28 40.28 43.80
    AUC/MPC90 16.06 13.64 20.14 21.90
    Cmax/MPC50 5.26 5.68 7.28 3.92
    Cmax/MPC90 1.28 2.84 3.64 1.96
    T > MPC50 (h) 24.59 20.36 38.37 15.37
    T > MPC90 (h) 6.46 11.53 23.97 7.57
a

Dose, AUC, Cmax, tmax, and t1/2 were from published data (given in the text) from pharmacokinetic studies of each fluoroquinolone in healthy pigs at the clinical dose.

b

The breakpoint of ciprofloxacin against all Salmonella species used was from the CLSI (M100-S23). BPs, breakpoint for susceptible (≤0.06 μg/ml); BPi, breakpoint for intermediate (0.12 to 1.0 μg/ml); BPr, breakpoint for resistant (≥2.0 μg/ml).

c

MICs of all clinical isolates from the present study were used.

d

MPCs of fluoroquinolone-susceptible clinical isolates (MIC of ≤0.06 μg/ml) from the present study were used.

Based on Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints of ciprofloxacin (23), the conventional dosing was shown to be effective for the susceptible, but not intermediate and resistant, in vitro isolates. On the other hand, AUC/MIC and Cmax/MIC ratios were not effective for the clinical isolates. In order to estimate an MPC-based dosing regimen, AUC/MPC ratio, Cmax/MPC ratio, and T > MPC (the time during which plasma concentrations exceed the mutant prevention concentration) surrogates were analyzed. Analysis was performed to determine whether the conventional doses of the three FQs could prevent the growth of the least susceptible Salmonella first-step mutants. Our results showed that the order of potency of three FQs against S. Typhimurium based on AUC/MPC ratios was MAR > ENR > DIF (Table 3). While only MAR at the highest doses could achieve high levels of AUC/MPC50 ratios, Cmax/MPC50 ratios, and T > MPC50, the AUC/MPC90 ratios and T > MPC90 of the three FQs were below the protective values obtained here.

DISCUSSION

The in vitro dynamic model approach was applied to measure the activity of three veterinary FQs against the emergence of resistance in S. Typhimurium. In the present study, S. Typhimurium ATCC 14028 was used with consideration of its susceptibility and its full genomic and phenotypic characterization.

The anti-Salmonella activities of the three FQs revealed an FQ-specific relationship between IE and AUC/MIC ratios. This was in agreement with our previous findings using FQs against E. coli and Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae (16, 22, 24). Furthermore, the IE showed species specificity that was lower (8 to 41%) than those from reports using non-biofilm-forming bacteria, while it was similar to IEs of FQs against biofilm-forming bacteria (difference of 8 to 10%) (16, 22, 24). The failure of FQs to suppress Salmonella growth in the culture could result not only from resistant populations but also from biofilm formation. However, the test strain used here was not a strong biofilm-forming strain, suggesting the role of AUC/MIC ratio-dependent losses in susceptibility upon continuous exposure to the FQs. The AUC/MPC value was suggested to be more accurate than the AUC/MIC value for the prevention of mutant selection, because the MPC concept includes a mutant subpopulation (7). In the present study, AUC/MPC ratios to reduce Salmonella-resistant mutants were 69 (DIF), 62 (ENR), and 39 (MAR). These results were consistent with previous reports (22, 24). However, in the current study, no difference of potency was found through conversion from AUC/MIC ratios to AUC/MPC ratios resulting from different MPC/MIC ratios, because the MPCs of all 3 FQs were 4 times higher than their respective MICs.

One interesting observation in this study was the differences in resistance mechanisms between in vitro-selected resistant mutants and resistant clinical isolates: mutation-dependent resistance (in vitro isolates) and efflux pump expression-dependent resistance (clinical isolates). Similarly, previous studies had also indicated that while field isolates or in vivo-selected mutants show small fold increases in MICs and often a single gyrA mutation, S. Typhimurium experimental mutants selected in vitro possess severalfold increases in MIC and multiple resistance mechanisms (2527). In Salmonella, single gyrA mutations, in either S83F or D87Y, were associated with FQ-resistant isolates from humans and animals (1012). Moreover, all field isolates harbored a single gyrA mutation of D87Y, which shows a lower MIC than mutation of S83F, while in vitro-selected resistance had an S83F mutation. Although no biochemistry was performed to confirm that this mutation conferred quinolone resistance, the mutation conferring a substitution at S83F is more abundant than at D87Y in vitro.

It has been suggested that the overexpression of efflux pumps is a sufficient condition for development of FQ resistance (28, 29). Furthermore, it has been reported that in the absence of acrAB-tolC, S. Typhimurium was unlikely to select mutation under ciprofloxacin pressure (30). In a resistant strain isolated from dynamic culture (STM-D3) and a clinical isolate (STM-isol-15), increases (2.5- to 3-fold) in acrAB-tolC mRNA expression and gyrA mutation were found, whereas the susceptible isolates showed suppressed acrAB-tolC gene expression and no gyrA mutation. These results indicate that a dosing strategy based on AUC/MPC (>39) was effective at preventing FQ resistance due to suppression of efflux pump overexpression and target mutation. The transcriptional activators, such as marA, soxS, ramA, and rob, have been reported to play a critical role in efflux pump activity in Salmonella (3032). Consistent with this, there was a positive correlation in expression levels of acrAB-tolC and each regulator in isolates from an in vitro dynamic model in which downregulated efflux pump expression was associated with suppressed global regulators.

The AUC/MIC ratio of 125 to 250 and Cmax/MIC ratio of greater than 8 to 10 were suggested to be the target PK/PD indices associated with efficacy of FQ treatment (18). Based on these endpoints, the three FQs could show high efficacy against susceptible clinical isolates, with AUC/MIC and Cmax/MIC ratios of greater than 160 and 15, respectively. However, these ratios had to be much lower to show efficacy against strains with intermediate susceptibility. Moreover, we integrated our MPC data with the AUC and Cmax values achievable at the clinically recommended doses of these drugs in pigs (Table 3), and when these values were compared with the PK/PD predictions (Fig. 3) and the AUC/MPC ratio obtained from the present study, only MAR, with an AUC/MPC50 ratio of 43.8, could achieve protection against the emergence of resistance in susceptible clinical isolates of S. Typhimurium. These findings suggest the applicability of the MPC-based dosing strategy for S. Typhimurium isolates only at higher doses of these agents and a better in vitro activity of a given AUC/MIC (AUC/MPC) ratio of MAR than those of DIF and ENR in terms of both antibacterial effect and prevention of the selection of mutants.

There are limitations to the use of MPC-based dosing, including the different drug concentration thresholds to restrict amplification of drug-resistant mutants depending on inoculum size and the chance for selection of a two-step mutation (8). Moreover, while MPC-based approaches can be useful to compare the abilities of FQs to prevent selection of S. Typhimurium mutants, the results of higher clinical dose requirements should be interpreted with caution, because inherently the in vitro MPC approach does not take into account the synergistic role of the immune system for clearing infections in vivo (7).

In summary, our results confirmed an AUC/MIC-dependent antibacterial activity and AUC/MPC-dependent selection of S. Typhimurium mutants in which maximum losses in FQ susceptibility occurred at simulated AUC/MIC ratios of 71 (DIF), 63 (ENR), and 47 (MAR). AUC/MPC ratios of 69 (DIF), 62 (ENR), and 39 (MAR) were estimated to be the minimum protective values against the selection of mutants. Generally, higher in vitro activity of a given AUC/MIC (AUC/MPC) ratio of MAR than DIF or ENR, in terms of both antibacterial effect and prevention of the selection of mutants, was observed. Both target mutations (gyrA; S83F) and overexpression of efflux pumps (acrAB-tolC) upregulated by global regulators contributed to these losses in susceptibility. Integration of the MIC and MPC data with published pharmacokinetic information in pigs revealed the inadequacy of the conventional dosing regimen of all three FQs in attaining the above-described protective values for 90% of the mutant subpopulation (AUC/MPC90), suggesting the need to reassess the current dosing regimens of the FQs to include both clinical efficacy and minimization of emergence of resistant bacteria.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and antimicrobial agents.

A standard strain (ATCC 14028) and 16 clinical isolates of S. Typhimurium from diseased pigs were used. Three fluoroquinolones (FQs), including difloxacin (DIF), enrofloxacin (ENR), and marbofloxacin (MAR), were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich. Stock solutions (1 mg/ml in 0.1 N NaOH) were prepared and stored at −20°C. Working solutions were prepared daily from stock solution by appropriate dilutions with the culture medium.

MIC and MPC determination.

Susceptibility tests were performed before, during, and after a 3-day course of treatment with the three FQs. The MICs were determined by the broth microdilution method according to the CLSI (23). MICs of a quality control organism, Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922), were also determined in parallel. MPCs were determined as described previously (9, 16). The MPC was defined as the lowest drug concentration that completely suppressed growth for 72 h. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Simulated pharmacokinetic profiles.

Single daily doses of the three FQs for 3 consecutive days with simulated half-lives (t1/2) consistent with those reported in pigs were used: 12.5 h for DIF (33, 34), 10.6 h for ENR (35, 36) and 8 h for MAR (37). The doses were selected to include the achievable area under the curve (AUC) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) over a 24-h dosing interval at the recommended clinical doses (1 to 5 mg/kg of body weight for DIF, 2.5 to 5 mg/kg for ENR, and 2 mg/kg for MAR) in pigs. The average ratios of the simulated AUC/MIC (averages of the values reached during 3 days) varied from approximately 13 to 20 and 210 to 314 for the three drugs (Fig. 6). These simulated AUC/MIC ratios corresponded to a Cmax that either equaled the MIC, fell between the MIC and MPC (i.e., within the mutant selection window, or MSW), or exceeded the MPC.

FIG 6.

FIG 6

In vitro simulated pharmacokinetic profiles of difloxacin (DIF), enrofloxacin (ENR), and marbofloxacin (MAR). Legends at the right indicate the AUC/MIC values and the percentage of the dosing interval in which fluoroquinolone concentrations fall within the mutant selection window (TMSW). Daily doses of the fluoroquinolones for 3 consecutive days were simulated.

In vitro dynamic model.

A previously described dynamic model (9, 16, 22, 38, 39) was used in this study. In brief, the model consisted of three connected flasks: a dilution compartment containing fresh Mueller-Hinton broth II (MHB II) broth, a central compartment with either a bacterial culture alone (control growth experiment) or a bacterial culture in medium containing drug (killing-regrowth experiments), and an elimination compartment containing waste broth and bacteria. Peristaltic pumps (Masterflex; Cole-Parmer, USA) circulated in one direction, from the dilution compartment to the central compartment and from the central compartment to the elimination compartment, at a flow rate of 3.2 ml/h for DIF, 3.9 ml/h for ENR, and 5 ml/h for MAR. The temperature of the system was maintained at 37°C throughout the experiments. An overnight culture of S. Typhimurium was used to inoculate the central unit. After a 2-h incubation, the resulting exponentially growing bacterial cultures reached 107 CFU/ml (6 × 108 CFU per 60-ml central unit). DIF, ENR, or MAR then was injected into the central unit. All experiments were conducted in duplicate with 2-week intervals. The reliability of FQ pharmacokinetic simulations and the high reproducibility of the time-kill curves provided by the model have been demonstrated previously using several drug-pathogen combinations (9, 39). Further, the actual bacterial exposure to the FQ was confirmed by validated high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods as described earlier (16, 22). Pilot studies done using the reference strain and clinical S. Typhimurium strains and two (one high and one low) simulated AUC/MIC ratios found that once the target AUC/MIC was achieved, no strain-specific differences in the kill-regrowth kinetics were observed (data not shown). This was in accordance with our previous studies with similar FQs and other bacterial species, including E. coli (16). Therefore, we chose the reference strain, which is a wild-type strain with full genomic and phenotypic characterization, to perform the experiments described below.

Quantification of the antimicrobial effect and susceptibility changes.

Multiple samples of bacterium-containing media were collected from the central compartment, and the number of bacteria was counted throughout the experimental period. The duration of the experiments was defined in each case as the time until FQ-exposed S. Typhimurium after the last dose reached the maximum numbers observed in the absence of antibiotic (≥109 CFU/ml), and the lower limit of accurate detection was 2 × 102 CFU/ml. To determine changes of susceptibility during treatment, MICs of bacterial cultures sampled from the system were determined at 24, 48, and 72 h and compared with the initial MICs. The stability of resistance was determined by consecutive passaging of S. Typhimurium that was exposed to drugs through drug-free agar plates for 5 consecutive days (9, 16, 22, 38, 39).

Relationship of the antimicrobial effect to the AUC/MIC ratio.

The time-kill data obtained from the present study were converted to the intensity of the antimicrobial effect (IE), which is defined as the area between the control growth and time-kill curves, with a cutoff level used for the regrowth and control growth curves of 109 CFU/ml (16). With each FQ, the IE versus log(AUC24/MIC) data were fitted by the Boltzmann function:

Y=YminYmax1+exp[(xx0)/dx]+Ymax (1)

where Y is the IE, Ymax and Ymin are its maximum and minimum values, respectively, x is the log(AUC24/MIC) ratio, x0 is the log(AUC/MIC) ratio that corresponds to Ymax/2, and dx is the width parameter.

Relationship of the emergence of resistance to the AUC/MIC ratio.

The MIC values measured at the end of drug exposure (MICfinal) were related to the values measured before exposing the bacterial strains to the 3-day course of FQs (MICinitial), and the fold changes in these MICs were integrated with the simulated AUC/MIC or AUC/MPC ratios using a Gaussian type function (16):

Y=Y0+aexp[(xxc)2b] (2)

where Y is the MICfinal/MICinitial ratio, Y0 is the minimum value of Y, x is the log(AUC/MIC) or log(AUC/MPC) ratio, xc is the log(AUC/MIC) or log(AUC/MPC) ratio that corresponds to the maximal value of MICfinal/MICinitial, and a and b are parameters. The same equation was used to visualize the IE relationship to resistance.

Population dynamics of fluoroquinolone treatment.

In our previous studies using several bacterial species, including E. coli and Actinobacillus pleuropneumonia, we observed the failure of high concentrations of FQs to clear bacteria in continuously flowing cultures (16, 24). Several mechanisms have been proposed to contribute to these phenomena, including the presence of a persister subpopulation that is physiologically refractory to antibiotics, the presence of an antibiotic refractory wall (biofilm) population that is washed out at a lower rate than the planktonic and persister populations, and density-dependent drug decay in which the effective concentration of the drug in the cultures is substantially less than that anticipated from washout-dependent flow alone (1921). We tested these mechanisms using previously described methods.

The bioassay approach was used to estimate drug decay by estimating the residual FQ concentration as described previously (19, 24). Briefly, medium was taken from the culture vessels every 6 h, centrifuged, and passed through 0.45-µm filters (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The activity of this medium against the control ATCC 14028 strain was assessed by the broth microdilution method as described above and was compared with the activity of medium containing freshly prepared drug.

Biofilm formation was evaluated by estimation of bacterial cells released from the inside walls of the culture flasks as previously described (19, 24). Briefly, after termination of continuous culture experiments, the medium was removed, the culture vessels were washed by adding an equal volume of phosphate-buffered saline sonicated for 1 min, and the liquid was removed. This procedure was repeated twice, after which an equal volume of MHB II was added. After 5 min of sonication at 56 kHz, the viable cell density was estimated by culturing dilutions of the wash on agar plates.

Further, a previously described mathematical model that predicts the population dynamics of the treated continuous culture was used to assess the contributions of different subpopulations or drug decay to the changes in viable cell density anticipated for continuous culture experiments (1921, 24).

Mechanisms of resistance.

To check for target mutations in quinolone resistance-determining regions (QRDRs), genomic DNA was extracted from both clinical isolates and isolates collected from the in vitro model, and PCR amplification was carried out using reported methods (40, 41). Sequences were analyzed by Macrogen (Seoul, South Korea). For gene expression analysis of efflux pump and global regulators, RNA was extracted from independent isolates and quantitative real-time PCR was performed as described previously (25). Relative gene expression was calculated using the 2−∆∆CT method (where the threshold cycle, CT, indicates the fractional cycle number at which the amount of amplified target reaches a fixed threshold) (42).

Statistical analysis and curve fitting.

All statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad InStat (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA). A simulation program, Berkeley Madonna, was used for population dynamics prediction estimation of the simulations (http://www.eclf.net). Statistical differences between groups were assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Duncan's multiple-range test (version 9.4; SAS Institute, Cary, NC). Differences were considered significant at a P value of <0.05.

Accession number(s).

The sequences determined in this study were deposited in the GenBank database under accession numbers KU325580 to KU325584, KU325564, KU325552, KU325556, and KU325558.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This research was supported by the Global Ph.D. Fellowship Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), funded by the Ministry of Education (2013-1034808), by the National Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant of the Korean government (2016R1A2B4013507), and by the Korean Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology (IPET) through the Technology Commercialization Support Program (314082-3), funded by the Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs.

The manuscript was based on a part of the first author's doctoral dissertation from Kyungpook National University.

We have no conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Sárközy G. 2001. Quinolones: a class of antimicrobial agents. Vet Med 46:257–274. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Izumiya H, Mori K, Kurazono T, Yamaguchi M, Higashide M, Konishi N, Kai A, Morita K, Terajima J, Watanabe H. 2005. Characterization of isolates of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium displaying high-level fluoroquinolone resistance in Japan. J Clin Microbiol 43:5074–5079. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.10.5074-5079.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Olsen SJ, DeBess EE, McGivern TE, Marano N, Eby T, Mauvais S, Balan VK, Zirnstein G, Cieslak PR, Angulo FJ. 2001. A nosocomial outbreak of fluoroquinolone-resistant Salmonella infection. N Engl J Med 344:1572–1579. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105243442102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Marshall BM, Levy SB. 2011. Food animals and antimicrobials: impacts on human health. Clin Microbiol 24:718–733. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00002-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Craig WA. 2001. Does the dose matter? Clin Infect Dis 33:S233–S237. doi: 10.1086/321854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jumbe N, Louie A, Leary R, Liu W, Deziel MR, Tam VH. 2003. Application of a mathematical model to prevent in vivo amplification of antibiotic-resistant bacterial populations during therapy. J Clin Investig 112:275–285. doi: 10.1172/JCI200316814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Drlica K, Zhao Z. 2007. Mutant selection window hypothesis updated. Clin Infect Dis 44:681–688. doi: 10.1086/511642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Roberts JA, Kruger P, Paterson DL, Lipman J. 2008. Antibiotic resistance–what's dosing got to do with it? Crit Care Med 36:2433–2440. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318180fe62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Firsov AA, Vostrov SN, Lubenko IY, Drlica K, Portnoy YA, Zinner SH. 2003. In vitro pharmacodynamic evaluation of the mutant selection window hypothesis using four fluoroquinolones against Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:1604–1613. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.5.1604-1613.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.De Knegt LV, Pires SM, Hald T. 2015. Attributing foodborne salmonellosis in humans to animal reservoirs in the European Union using a multi-country stochastic model. Epidemiol Infect 143:1175–1186. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814001903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yu F, Chen Q, Yu X, Pan J, Li Q, Yang L. 2011. High prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinant aac(6′)-Ib-cr amongst Salmonella enterica serotype Typhimurium isolates from hospitalised paediatric patients with diarrhoea in China. Int J Antimicrob Agents 37:152–155. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2010.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bager F, Helmuth R. 2001. Epidemiology of resistance to quinolones in Salmonella. Vet Res 32:285–290. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2001125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Davis JL, Smith GW, Baynes RE, Tell LA, Webb AI, Riviere JE. 2009. Update on drugs prohibited from extralabel use in food animals. J Am Vet Med Assoc 235:528–534. doi: 10.2460/javma.235.5.528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Anderson AD, Nelson JM, Rossiter S, Angulo FJ. 2003. Public health consequences of use of antimicrobial agents in food animals in the United States. Microb Drug Resist 9:373–379. doi: 10.1089/107662903322762815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Perreten V. 2005. Resistance in the food chain and in bacteria from animals: relevance to human infections, p 446–464. In White DG, Alekshun MN, McDermott PF (ed), Frontiers in antimicrobial resistance: a tribute to Stuart B. Levy. ASM Press, Washington, DC. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Gebru E, Damte D, Choi MJ, Lee SJ, Kim YH, Park SC. 2012. Mutant prevention concentration and phenotypic and molecular basis of fluoroquinolone resistance in clinical isolates and in vitro-selected mutants of Escherichia coli from dogs. Vet Microbiol 154:384–394. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lee S-J, Park S-C. 2015. Fluoroquinolones in vitro dynamic model to minimize emergence of resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 38:12–13. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Toutain PL, del Castillo JR, Bousquet-Mélou A. 2002. The pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic approach to a rational dosage regimen for antibiotics. Res Vet Sci 73:105–114. doi: 10.1016/S0034-5288(02)00039-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Udekwu KI, Levin BR. 2012. Staphylococcus aureus in continuous culture: a tool for the rational design of antibiotic treatment protocols. PLoS One 7:e38866. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038866. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Levin BR, Udekwu KI. 2010. Population dynamics of antibiotic treatment: a mathematical model and hypotheses for time-kill and continuous-culture experiments. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3414–3426. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00381-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Keren I, Shah D, Spoering A, Kaldalu N, Lewis K. 2004. Specialized persister cells and the mechanism of multidrug tolerance in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 186:8172–8180. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.24.8172-8180.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gebru E, Choi MJ, Lee SJ, Damte D, Park SC. 2011. Mutant-prevention concentration and mechanism of resistance in clinical isolates and enrofloxacin/marbofloxacin-selected mutants of Escherichia coli of canine origin. J Med Microbiol 60:1512–1522. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.028654-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2013. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; 23rd informational supplement. Document M100-S23. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Damte D, Lee SJ, Yohannes SB, Hossain MA, Suh JW, Park SC. 2013. Comparative activities of selected fluoroquinolones against dynamic populations of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae in an in vitro model of time-kill continuous culture experiment. Int J Antimicrob Agents 42:544–552. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.O'Regan E, Quinn T, Pagès JM, McCusker M, Piddock L, Fanning S. 2009. Multiple regulatory pathways associated with high-level ciprofloxacin and multidrug resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar enteritidis: involvement of RamA and other global regulators. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:1080–1087. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01005-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Reyna F, Huesca M, González V, Fuchs LY. 1995. Salmonella typhimurium gyrA mutations associated with fluoroquinolone resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 39:1621–1623. doi: 10.1128/AAC.39.7.1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Giraud E, Brisabois A, Martel JL, Chaslus-Dancla E. 1999. Comparative studies of mutations in animal isolates and experimental in vitro- and in vivo-selected mutants of Salmonella spp. suggest a counterselection of highly fluoroquinolone-resistant strains in the field. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:2131–2137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Jumbe NL, Louie A, Miller MH, Liu W, Deziel MR, Tam VH, Bachhawat R, Drusano GL. 2006. Quinolone efflux pumps play a central role in emergence of fluoroquinolone resistance in Streptococcus pneumoniae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:310–317. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.1.310-317.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chen S, Cui S, McDermott PF, Zhao S, White DG, Paulsen I, Meng J. 2007. Contribution of target gene mutations and efflux to decreased susceptibility of Salmonella enterica serovar typhimurium to fluoroquinolones and other antimicrobials. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:535–542. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00600-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ricci V, Tzakas P, Buckley A, Piddock LJ. 2006. Ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains are difficult to select in the absence of AcrB and TolC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:38–42. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.1.38-42.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Webber MA, Piddock LJ. 2001. Absence of mutations in marRAB or soxRS in acrB-overexpressing fluoroquinolone-resistant clinical and veterinary isolates of Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:1550–1552. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.5.1550-1552.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Nikaido E, Yamaguchi A, Nishino K. 2008. AcrAB Multidrug efflux pump regulation in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium by RamA in response to environmental signals. J Biol Chem 283:24245–24253. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M804544200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Inui T, Taira T, Matsushita T, Endo T. 1998. Pharmacokinetic properties and oral bioavailabilities of difloxacin in pig and chicken. Xenobiotica 28:887–893. doi: 10.1080/004982598239128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Ding HZ, Yang GX, Huang XH, Chen ZL, Zeng ZL. 2008. Pharmacokinetics of difloxacin in pigs and broilers following intravenous, intramuscular, and oral single-dose applications. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 31:200–204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2008.00951.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Cox SK, Cottrell MB, Smith L, Papich MG, Frazier DL, Bartges J. 2004. Allometric analysis of ciprofloxacin and enrofloxacin pharmacokinetics across species. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 27:139–146. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2004.00560.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Post LO, Farrell DE, Cope CV, Baker JD, Myers MJ. 2003. The effect of endotoxin and dexamethasone on enrofloxacin pharmacokinetic parameters in swine. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 304:889–895. doi: 10.1124/jpet.102.042416. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Ding H, Li Y, Chen Z, Rizwan-ul Haq M, Zeng Z. 2010. Plasma and tissue cage fluid pharmacokinetics of marbofloxacin after intravenous, intramuscular, and oral single-dose application in pigs. J Vet Pharmacol Ther 33:507–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2885.2010.01164.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zinner SH, Lubenko IY, Gilbert D, Simmons K, Zhao X, Drlica K, Firsov AA. 2003. Emergence of resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro dynamic model that simulates moxifloxacin concentrations inside and outside the mutant selection window: related changes in susceptibility, resistance frequency and bacterial killing. J Antimicrob Chemother 52:616–622. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkg401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Firsov AA, Shevchenko AA, Vostrov SN, Zinner SH. 1998. Inter- and intraquinolone predictors of antimicrobial effect in an in vitro dynamic model: new insight into a widely used concept. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:659–665. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Eaves DJ, Liebana E, Woodward MJ, Piddock LJ. 2002. Detection of gyrA mutations in quinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. J Clin Microbiol 40:4121–4125. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.11.4121-4125.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Eaves DJ, Randall L, Gray DT, Buckley A, Woodward MJ, White AP, Piddock LJ. 2004. Prevalence of mutations within the quinolone resistance-determining region of gyrA, gyrB, parC, and parE and association with antibiotic resistance in quinolone-resistant Salmonella enterica. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:4012–4015. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.10.4012-4015.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) method. Methods 25:402–408. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES