Skip to main content
Stem Cells International logoLink to Stem Cells International
editorial
. 2017 Jan 17;2017:1315243. doi: 10.1155/2017/1315243

Bone Microenvironment, Stem Cells, and Bone Tissue Regeneration

ZuFu Lu 1,*, Jenneke Kleine-Nulend 2, Bin Li 3
PMCID: PMC5282439  PMID: 28194182

Despite the remarkable regenerative capacity of bone, the regeneration of large bone defects and the repair of nonunion bone fractures remain a major challenge in orthopaedic surgeries. Bone is the second most commonly transplanted tissue with over 1.5 million bone graft surgeries being performed annually in the United States [1]. However, the major limitations confronted with conventional bone grafts include limited availability and donor site morbidity for autografts and the risk of pathogen transmission for allografts [2, 3]. Given these limitations, there is a great need for developing novel and effective approaches for the regeneration of large bone defects and the repair of nonunion bone fracture.

Stem cell-based bone tissue engineering offers a promising approach for regenerating critical sized bone defects or repairing nonunion bone fracture. Understanding and recreating a signalling environment to control the differentiation of stem cells into the bone lineage would be of great importance. The components in bone microenvironment, which include a mineral phase (hydroxyapatite nanocrystals), an organic phase (composed of 90% collagen type I), a cellular phase (osteoblasts, osteoclasts, and osteocytes), and a soluble factor phase (growth factors and/or cytokines), provide a specific and balanced signalling network, which contribute to the innate bone metabolic and anabolic activities and maintain the structure and functions of the bone. Substantial efforts, therefore, have been made to mimic the bone tissue microenvironmental components for controlling the commitment of stem cells into osteogenic lineage cells for bone tissue regeneration. For example, by mimicking the bone nanostructure to engineering bone-related biomaterials, researchers have incorporated nanocrystals into biomaterials and demonstrated that they are effective in regulating various cellular functions including cell adhesion, proliferation, and differentiation [4, 5]; in addition, mimicking the signals provided by bone cellular phase (e.g., osteoblasts) has also been shown as a feasible approach to control stem cell fate into osteogenic lineage [5, 6]. Moreover, the cytokines and/or growth factors within bone microenvironment play a key role as well in the bone remodeling process, and mimicking their signals has been proven to be very successful in steering MSCs into bone lineage. Recently, inflammatory factors, transiently expressed by macrophages upon tissue injury, have increasingly been appreciated for their role in tissue repair and regeneration [79].

In this special issue, some cutting-edge original researches as well as review articles related to priming stem cell fate into the osteogenic lineage via mimicking the bone components (e.g., bone extracellular matrix, cells, and growth factors) were introduced and provided the readers with the updated knowledge and progression in the topic of bone microenvironment, stem cells, and bone tissue regeneration.

ZuFu Lu
Jenneke Kleine-Nulend
Bin Li

References

  • 1.Marsh D. Concepts of fracture union, delayed union, and nonunion. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1998;355:S22–S30. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199810001-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Goulet J. A., Senunas L. E., DeSilva G. L., Greenfield M. L. V. H. Autogenous iliac crest bone graft: complications and functional assessment. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research. 1997;(339):76–81. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199706000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lord C. F., Gebhardt M. C., Tomford W. W., Mankin H. J. Infection in bone allografts. Incidence, nature, and treatment. The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American Volume. 1988;70(3):369–376. doi: 10.2106/00004623-198870030-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang G., Lu Z., Zhao X., Kondyurin A., Zreiqat H. Ordered HAp nanoarchitecture formed on HAp-TCP bioceramics by ‘nanocarving’ and mineralization deposition and its potential use for guiding cell behaviors. Journal of Materials Chemistry B. 2013;1(19):2455–2462. doi: 10.1039/c3tb20164c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lu Z., Roohani-Esfahani S.-I., Wang G., Zreiqat H. Bone biomimetic microenvironment induces osteogenic differentiation of adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology, and Medicine. 2012;8(4):507–515. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2011.07.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Lu Z., Roohani-Esfahani S.-I., Kwok P. C. L., Zreiqat H. Osteoblasts on rod shaped hydroxyapatite nanoparticles incorporated pcl film provide an optimal osteogenic niche for stem cell differentiation. Tissue Engineering - Part A. 2011;17(11-12):1651–1661. doi: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Lu Z., Wang G., Dunstan C. R., et al. Activation and promotion of adipose stem cells by tumour necrosis factor-α preconditioning for bone regeneration. Journal of Cellular Physiology. 2013;228(8):1737–1744. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Glass G. E., Chan J. K., Freidin A., Feldmann M., Horwood N. J., Nanchahal J. TNF-α promotes fracture repair by augmenting the recruitment and differentiation of muscle-derived stromal cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2011;108(4):1585–1590. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1018501108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Mountziaris P. M., Spicer P. P., Kasper F. K., Mikos A. G. Harnessing and modulating inflammation in strategies for bone regeneration. Tissue Engineering—Part B: Reviews. 2011;17(6):393–402. doi: 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Stem Cells International are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES