Abstract
Background
Early diagnosis of syphilis and timely treatment can effectively reduce ongoing syphilis transmission and morbidity. We examined the factors associated with the early diagnosis of syphilis to inform syphilis screening strategic planning.
Methods
In an observational study, we analyzed reported syphilis cases in Guangdong Province, China (from 2014 to mid-2015) accessed from the national case-based surveillance system. We categorized primary and secondary syphilis cases as early diagnosis and categorized latent and tertiary syphilis as delayed diagnosis. Univariate analyses and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to identify the factors associated with early diagnosis. We also examined the factors associated with early diagnosis at the individual and city levels in multilevel logistic regression models with cases nested by city (n = 21), adjusted for age at diagnosis and gender.
Results
Among 83,944 diagnosed syphilis cases, 22% were early diagnoses. The city-level early diagnosis rate ranged from 7 to 46%, consistent with substantial geographic variation as shown in the multilevel model. Early diagnosis was associated with cases presenting to specialist clinics for screening, being male and attaining higher education level. Cases received syphilis testing in institutions and hospitals, and diagnosed in hospitals were less likely to be in early diagnosis. At the city-level, cases living in a city equipped with more hospitals per capita were less likely to be early diagnosis.
Conclusions
To enhance early diagnosis of syphilis, city-specific syphilis screening strategies with a mix of passive and client/provider-initiated testing might be a useful approach.
Keywords: Syphilis, China, Diagnosis, Screening
Background
Early diagnosis of syphilis permits treatment, which is important for stopping disease progression and preventing complications and morbidity caused by tertiary syphilis [1, 2]. In addition, treatment can effectively reduce the infectiousness of early syphilis and decrease ongoing transmission [3]. Individuals with primary and secondary syphilis are known to be at increased risk of HIV infection [4]. Early diagnosis therefore provides an opportunity for early intervention, preventing further HIV/sexually transmitted disease(STD) co-infection. Syphilis typically presents with symptoms and signs soon after infection and these initial stages are referred to as primary and secondary stages [1]. If infected individuals are not tested during the symptomatic period, their infection often becomes asymptomatic. The infection would continue to go undetected until being screened passively or occasionally, or progression to tertiary syphilis—at which point it is too late to prevent adverse clinical outcomes.
There have been limited studies on identifying the factors associated with the time of diagnosis (early vs delayed diagnosis). Most syphilis studies investigated the factors associated with syphilis incidence rate. Incident cases were identified by screening in selected subpopulations, such as men who have sex with men (MSM) [5, 6] or HIV-infected individuals [7]. Only one study in China explored the factors associated with primary/secondary syphilis (vs latent syphilis), but their focus was on the identification of the subpopulations with higher disease burden [8]. One other Chinese study estimated the days from infection to diagnosis and examined the associated factors [9]. Medical care and syphilis testing accessibility vary substantially from city to city in China. Due to these differences among geographic areas, there may be a correlation between geographic area and rate of early diagnosis. Differences in medical training of health personnel, locally available syphilis services, and payment mechanisms exist in different geographical areas [10–12]. People often share a similar structural and cultural environment such as healthcare facilities and economic development when they live in the same area. The likelihood of early diagnosis among infected cases might be correlated within an area but differ in other areas. Multilevel modelling, a method accounting for repeated measurements, or correlated outcomes within a city, [13] could be a useful way for examining associated factors at individual and city levels and reducing potential bias.
Syphilis incidence in China has increased dramatically in the last decade, [14] despite reporting changes that may under-estimate previous disease burden [15]. Guangdong Province has experienced a significant rise in syphilis cases in the last decade and ranked first in China on the number of newly reported syphilis cases in 2013 (53,241 cases) [15–17]. We used multilevel modelling to examine factors associated with early diagnosis at individual and city levels to improve syphilis screening strategies.
Methods
Data source
Syphilis cases are defined by laboratory confirmation (positive non-treponemal and treponemal test) and clinical diagnosis in China [15]. All clinics and hospitals are required by law to report newly diagnosed cases within 24 h to the national case-based surveillance system (CBSS). As long as the cases are newly diagnosed in health-care settings, the setting has to report to CBSS regardless of their residential city/province. We accessed all reported cases of syphilis in Guangdong Province from 2014 through mid-July 2015 from CBSS for this observational study. The dataset included information of patients’ socio-demographics, residential location and diagnosed syphilis stage [18]. IRB approval was obtained from the Guangdong Provincial Center for Skin Diseases and STI Control, China, and from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Variables
We divided syphilis cases into two categories: early diagnosis or delayed diagnosis. Early diagnosis included primary and secondary syphilis cases because at these stages there is still an opportunity to decrease disease progression and reduce transmission risk. Delayed diagnosis included latent and tertiary syphilis cases. A grouping of primary and secondary stages is in line with the main benchmark of Chinese ministry of health 2010–2020 syphilis control plan [14]. The categorization was also derived from European guidelines [1] that categorize primary, secondary and early latent stage as early syphilis (appearing in the first two years of infection) and categorize late latent and tertiary stage as late syphilis. The reporting system in China was unable to differentiate between early and late latent syphilis cases, so all latent stage cases were also classified as delayed diagnosis.
Factors at individual and city levels potentially associated with early diagnosis were examined. Individual factors included socio-demographics (age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, highest education level attained and residential location), history of exposure, reasons for syphilis testing (including testing in STD clinics and VCT sites, testing in non-STD clinic and compulsory testing in institutions) and type of public healthcare settings for diagnosis. Reasons for testing in institutions included compulsory testing for immigrants, blood recipients/donors/sellers, new army recruits and staff in entertainment sites. City-level factors included demographics, economics, healthcare facilities and markers for disease burden (total number of diagnosed syphilis cases and rate of new diagnosis). City-level data were retrieved from Guangdong Statistical Yearbook 2014 [19].
Statistical analyses
Bivariate analysis was used to determine the crude odds ratio (OR) of each factor with early diagnosis in SPSS. Sensitivity analyses were performed to examine the confounding effects of age at diagnosis (continuous variable) and gender (binary) in multivariable logistic regression models. With above 10% change of OR for most independent variables, multivariable logistic regression models were performed, adjusting for age at diagnosis and gender. The homogeneity of proportion of early diagnosis across cities was then examined in empty multilevel logistic regression model, with diagnosed cases in level one and cities in level two. Median odds ratio (MOR) was used to measure the degree of heterogeneity [13]. With certain degree of heterogeneity of early diagnosis rate across cities, explanatory models were constructed to include each of the individual level and city-level factors, adjusting for age at diagnosis and gender. Proportional change of variance (PCV) was used to denote the proportion of variance in empty model to be explained by the explanatory model [20]. All multilevel models were performed in R3.2.1 using lme4 packages, in binomial distribution. Complete-case analyses were conducted.
Results
Characteristics of study population
From 2014 to mid-2015, 88,910 syphilis cases were reported in Guangdong Province and 85,231 were living in the province at diagnosis. Among 85,231 cases, 11,422 (13%) were diagnosed as primary syphilis, 6,679 (8%) as secondary syphilis, 64,881 (76%) as latent syphilis, 962 (1%) as tertiary syphilis and 1,287 (2%) as congenital syphilis.
Excluding congenital syphilis, a total of 83,944 reported syphilis cases living in Guangdong Province were selected for analyses in this study. Among them, 44,613 (53%) were male, and 73% aged below 60 at diagnosis (median age = 44, interquartile range (IQR) = 31-61). A total of 68,061 (81%) were diagnosed in hospitals, with the median of 82% and IQR 74%–88% among 21 cities in the Province. Reasons for testing were reported among 25,207 cases. Among them, 9,659 (38%) were non-STD clinic patients, 5,145 (20%) were patients undergoing surgery (pre-surgical testing), 1,529 (6%) were pregnant women and 832 (3%) cases received compulsory screening in institutions. Only 5,592 (22%) cases were patients in STD clinics, and 1,140 (5%) were individuals diagnosed at voluntary counseling and testing (VCT) sites for HIV counseling and testing (Table 1). At city-level (n = 21), the median proportion of reported cases that were non-STD clinic patients was 41% (IQR = 34%–46%), that were patients undergoing surgery was 23% (IQR18%–27%), and that were STD patients was 13% (IQR 9%–22%).
Table 1.
Province-level | City-level (21 cities) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Frequency | (%)a | Median | (IQR)b | |
Type of institutions for diagnosis (N = 83944) | ||||
Hospital | 68061 | (81%) | 82% | (74%–88%) |
Health Center | 5244 | (6%) | 2% | (2%–9%) |
Maternal child health center | 5033 | (6%) | 7% | (4%–7%) |
Specialized disease prevention & treatment institution | 4377 | (5%) | 4% | (2%–8%) |
Community health center & station | 507 | (1%) | 0.1% | (0%–1%) |
Sub-district health center, village clinic, outpatient department, clinic | 339 | (0.4%) | 0.3% | (0.1%–1%) |
CDC | 204 | (0.2%) | 0.1% | (0.04%–0.3%) |
Center for blood collection & supply | 11 | (0.01%) | 0% | (0%–0%) |
Others | 168 | (0.2%) | 0.03% | (0%–0.2%) |
Reasons for testing (N = 25207) | ||||
Non-STD clinic patient screening | 9659 | (38%) | 41% | (34%–46%) |
STD clinic screening | 5592 | (22%) | 13% | (9%–22%) |
Pre-surgery screening | 5145 | (20%) | 23% | (18%–27%) |
Prenatal screening | 1529 | (6%) | 7% | (5%–9%) |
Voluntary counselling and testing | 1140 | (5%) | 4% | (2%–5%) |
Others, including testing initiated by community-based organization and occupation exposure | 851 | (3%) | 2% | (1%–3%) |
Compulsory screening (for immigrant, blood recipient/donor/seller, new army recruits and staff in entertainment sites) | 832 | (3%) | 3% | 2%–6%) |
Pre-marital screening | 281 | (1%) | 0.4% | (0.1%–1%) |
Screening for sex partners and children of positive cases | 178 | (1%) | 1% | (0.3%–1%) |
atotal number and proportion of cases in categories in Guangdong Province
bmedian and interquartile range (IQR) of proportion of reported cases in categories among 21 cities in Guangdong Province
For reported syphilis cases living outside Guangdong Province (n = 3653, congenital syphilis exclusive), 1693 (46%) were male and 3224 (88%) aged <60. A total of 677 (19%) cases were diagnosed as primary or secondary syphilis, and 2909 (80%) were diagnosed in hospitals.
Distribution of proportion of early diagnosis of syphilis at city-level
A total of 18,101 cases (22%) living in Guangdong Province were diagnosed as primary or secondary syphilis, and 65,843 cases (78%) as tertiary or latent syphilis in the study period. The variation of proportion of early diagnosis across cities was moderate, as illustrated in the empty multilevel model (MOR = 1.69) and varied dot size on the map in Fig. 1. The proportion of early diagnosis in the study period in cities ranged from 7% (159/2438) in Shaoguan to 46% (1962/4292) in Maoming. However, cities with the highest number of new diagnoses per 1000 persons in 2014 were Qingyuan (96 cases per 1000 persons), Foshan (79 cases per 1000 persons) and Shenzhen (75 cases per 1000 persons).
Individual level factors associated with early diagnosis of syphilis
In a multilevel model, males (adjusted OR (aOR) = 1.27, 95% C.I. = 1.22–1.31, PCV = -1%) were more likely to experience early diagnosis, while those aged 60 or older at diagnosis (aOR = 0.52, 95% C.I. = 0.5–0.55, PCV = 1%) were less likely to be in early diagnosis (Table 2). However, both factors (with minimal PCV) were not able to explain the heterogeneity of early diagnosis rate in cities. Being single (aOR = 2.81, 95% C.I. = 2.58–3.06, PCV = 23%) and attaining a higher education level (aOR = 1.48; 95% C.I. = 1.36–1.60, PCV = 33%) were more likely to be associated with early diagnosis. Both accounted for 23–33% of variance at city-level. Married females were significantly less likely to be in early diagnosis than married males (aOR = 0.91; 95% C.I. = 0.84–0.98, PCV = 21%).
Table 2.
Total | Early diagnosis | Univariate analysis | Multilevel model | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
frequency | % | OR (95% C.I.) | aOR (95% C.I.) | ||
Gender | PCV: -1% | ||||
Female | 39331 | 7719 | 20% | ref | ref |
Male | 44613 | 10382 | 23% | 1.24 (1.2–1.28)* | 1.27 (1.22–1.31)* |
Age at diagnosis | PCV: 1% | ||||
< 60 years old | 61470 | 14719 | 24% | ref | ref |
≥ 60 years old | 22474 | 3382 | 15% | 0.56 (0.54–0.59)* | 0.52 (0.5–0.55)* |
Marital status | PCV: 23% | ||||
Married, divorced, widowed | 19652 | 3141 | 16% | ref | ref |
Single | 3186 | 1082 | 34% | 2.70 (2.49–2.94)* | 2.81 (2.58–3.06)* |
Among married cases | PCV: 21% | ||||
Married male | 9545 | 1585 | 17% | ref | ref |
Married female | 9296 | 1458 | 16% | 0.93 (0.86–1.01) | 0.91 (0.84–0.98)* |
Ethnicity | |||||
Non-Han | 292 | 76 | 26% | ref | ref |
Han | 23069 | 4513 | 20% | 0.69 (0.53–0.9)* | / |
Highest education level attained | PCV: 33% | ||||
No schooling or primary school | 6945 | 1016 | 15% | ref | ref |
Secondary school or above | 16827 | 3344 | 20% | 1.45 (1.34–1.56)* | 1.48 (1.36–1.6)* |
aOR adjusted odds ratio in multilevel model with 1 explanatory factor, C.I. confidence interval
*p < 0.05
After adjusting for age at diagnosis in the multilevel model, cases reported having had sexual contact with MSM (aOR = 3.06, 95% C.I. = 2.49–3.77, PCV = -15%) was more likely to be in early diagnosis (Table 3). However, reporting having had sex with regular partners who were tested positive for syphilis (aOR = 0.84, 95% C.I. = 0.75–0.94, PCV = -26%) was less likely to be associated with early diagnosis, after adjusting for age at diagnosis and gender. These factors increased 15–26% of variance compared with the empty model. Similarly, having received a syphilis test in the STD clinic or VCT sites (aOR = 2.05, 95% C.I. = 1.90–2.20, PCV = 19%) was more likely to be associated with early diagnosis. However, having received compulsory testing in institutions (aOR = 0.43, 95% C.I. = 0.34–0.54, PCV = 21%), pre-surgical testing (aOR = 0.71, 95% C.I. = 0.65–0.78, PCV = 17%) or being non-STD clinic patients who received testing in hospitals (aOR = 0.79, 95% C.I. = 0.73–0.84, PCV = 14%) were less likely to be associated with early diagnosis.
Table 3.
Total | Early diagnosis | Multivariable logistic regression | Multilevel model | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
frequency | % | aOR (95% C.I.)a | aOR (95% C.I.)a | ||
History of exposure | |||||
Extramarital sexual history | PCV: -27% | ||||
No | 3860 | 776 | 20% | ref | ref |
Yes | 9037 | 2052 | 23% | 1.05 (0.95–1.16) | 1.03 (0.93–1.14) |
Sex with regular partner who was tested positive for syphilis | PCV: -26% | ||||
No | 9777 | 2298 | 24% | ref | ref |
Yes | 3120 | 530 | 17% | 0.83 (0.74–0.93)* | 0.84 (0.75–0.94)* |
Sex with MSMb | PCV: -15% | ||||
No | 12498 | 2635 | 21% | ref | ref |
Yes | 399 | 193 | 48% | 2.73 (2.23–3.35)* | 3.06 (2.49–3.77)* |
Reasons for testing | |||||
Test for those visiting STD clinic or VCT | PCV: 19% | ||||
No | 18475 | 2755 | 15% | ref | ref |
Yes | 6732 | 2023 | 30% | 1.97 (1.84–2.11)* | 2.05 (1.90–2.20)* |
Compulsory testingc | PCV: 21% | ||||
No | 24375 | 4698 | 19% | ref | ref |
Yes | 832 | 80 | 10% | 0.38 (0.30–0.48)* | 0.43 (0.34–0.54)* |
Test before surgery | PCV: 17% | ||||
No | 20062 | 4113 | 21% | ref | ref |
Yes | 5145 | 665 | 13% | 0.71 (0.65–0.78)* | 0.71 (0.65–0.78)* |
Test for non-STD clinic patients | PCV: 14% | ||||
No | 15548 | 3254 | 21% | ref | ref |
Yes | 9659 | 1524 | 16% | 0.80 (0.75–0.86)* | 0.79 (0.73–0.84)* |
Type of diagnosed institute | |||||
from STD clinic | PCV: -2% | ||||
No | 82793 | 17652 | 21% | ref | ref |
Yes | 1145 | 446 | 39% | 2.03 (1.80–2.29)* | 2.43 (2.14–2.76)* |
Hospital | PCV: 0% | ||||
No | 15883 | 4159 | 26% | ref | ref |
Yes | 68061 | 13942 | 21% | 0.80 (0.76–0.83)* | 0.79 (0.75–0.82)* |
Diagnosed outside residential city | PCV: -2% | ||||
No | 71385 | 15457 | 22% | ref | ref |
Yes | 12559 | 2644 | 21% | 0.90 (0.86–0.95)* | 0.80 (0.76–0.84)* |
Diagnosed outside residential county | PCV: 0% | ||||
No | 54969 | 11741 | 21% | ref | ref |
Yes | 28975 | 6360 | 22% | 1.03 (0.99–1.06) | 1.00 (0.96–1.04) |
aOR adjusted odds ratio, C.I. confidence interval, PCV proportional change of variance, MSM men who have sex with men, STD sexually transmitted diseases, VCT voluntary counselling and testing
aadjusted by age at diagnosis (continuous variable) and male gender (binary variable)
badjusted by age at diagnosis (continuous variable) only
cCompulsory testing for immigrant, prisoner (male and female), drug uses in drug rehabilitation, blood recipient, blood donor, blood seller, new army recruits, staff in entertainment sites
*p < 0.05
Cases diagnosed in STD clinics were more likely to be in early diagnosis (aOR = 2.43, 95% C.I. = 2.14–2.76, PCV = -2%), but cases diagnosed in hospitals were less likely to be in early diagnosis (aOR = 0.79, 95% C.I. = 0.75–0.82, PCV = 0%). Comparing the residential location with the diagnosis location, cases diagnosed outside their residential city were less likely to be in early diagnosis (aOR = 0.80, 95% C.I. = 0.76–0.84, PCV = -2%). However, only minimal proportion of city-level variance was attributable to these factors.
City-level factors associated with early diagnosis of syphilis
The city-level factors significantly associated with early diagnosis included city with higher proportion of immigrants (aOR = 7.78, 95% C.I. = 2.12–28.54, PCV = 0%) and emigrants (aOR = 5.05, 95% = 1.13–22.47, PCV = 0%), without the adjustment by age at diagnosis and gender (Table 4). However, cases living in a city equipped with more hospitals per 10,000 persons (aOR = 0.03, 95% C.I. = 0–0.63, PCV = 9%) were less likely in early diagnosis. Other city-level factors were not significantly associated with early diagnosis in multilevel model.
Table 4.
Early diagnosis | |||
---|---|---|---|
aORa | 95% C.I. | PCV | |
Demographics | |||
Total population (permanent residence)b | 1.04 | 0.79–1.37 | 0% |
% of agricultural populationc | 1.03 | 0.51–2.06 | 0% |
% of urban populationbd | 1.04 | 0.81–1.34 | 0% |
% of immigrantsd | 7.78 | 2.12–28.54* | 0% |
% of emigrantsd | 5.05 | 1.13–22.47* | 0% |
Economics | |||
% of employedc | 1.60 | 0.67–3.84 | 1% |
Average annual earnings of the employedb | 1.00 | 0.74–1.34 | 0% |
GDP per capitaa | 1.06 | 0.8–1.39 | 1% |
Healthcare system | |||
% of people covered by healthcare programbc | 1.14 | 0.92–1.41 | 6% |
No. of institutions per 10000 personsc | 0.85 | 0.65–1.11 | 4% |
No. of hospitals per 10000 personsc | 0.03 | 0–0.63* | 9% |
No. of medical persons per10000 personsbc | 0.93 | 0.72–1.19 | 2% |
Disease burden | |||
Total number of syphilis cases (2014 to mid-2015)be | 0.98 | 0.74–1.3 | 0% |
New diagnosis per 1000 persons (2014)bcf | 0.98 | 0.78–1.22 | 0% |
C.I. confidence interval, PCV proportional change of variance, GDP Gross domestic product
a aOR – adjusted odds ratio in multilevel model with 1 explanatory factor
bvalue was rescaled and centered using R function scale
cdenominator as 2013 permanent population
ddenominator as 2013 population with residence registration
eTotal number of diagnosed syphilis cases was the total number of all diagnosed syphilis cases, including congenital syphilis, within the study period in each city
f New diagnosis rate of a city = total number of primary, secondary, latent and tertiary syphilis cases in 2014/permanent population in 2013 census
*p < 0.05
Discussion
Among almost 84,000 newly reported syphilis cases in 2014 and mid-2015 in Guangdong Province, only 22% were in early diagnosis (primary or secondary syphilis). The high number of reported latent and tertiary syphilis cases indicates a missed opportunity for diagnosing and treating syphilis at an earlier stage, which could prevent transmission and complications if these cases were diagnosed earlier. This paper expands the literature by identifying factors associated with early diagnosis and observing the moderate heterogeneity of early diagnosis rate in 21 cities in the Province.
In this study, older individuals and those with lower education level were more likely to have delayed syphilis diagnosis. The association of older aged and delayed syphilis was consistent with conclusion in a previous study, though it compared primary/secondary syphilis with latent syphilis cases [8]. Older individuals with delayed syphilis is a reflection of the time taken for syphilis to progress to late stages. However, the possibility of recent infection of syphilis among the elderly should not be ignored. A significant proportion of male clients (aged ≥40) of female sex workers (FSW) were having sex in “lower-tier” sex venues, where condom usage rates were low [21]. Even though the proportion of elderly men having sex with FSW was not known, the study indicated their risk of acquiring STD. On the other hand, individuals with lower education level were more likely to have misconceptions about STDs (for example, a belief that permanent immunity followed an STD infection) and unaware of co-infection and transmission risk during asymptomatic periods, [22] which might be the reasons for more delayed diagnoses than those with higher education level. Their association with higher syphilis prevalence and incidence as shown in the previous studies [7, 23] further highlighted the importance of this subgroup for syphilis prevention and control.
Our results showed that reasons for testing (25,207 out of 83,944 data available for analysis) were significant predictors of early vs delayed diagnosis. Among screening sites, 27% of diagnosed syphilis cases were identified through testing in STD clinics and VCT sites, of which 30% were in the early diagnosis group. They were more likely to be in early diagnosis, even after the adjustment of age at diagnosis and gender. Most of the patients in STD clinics are those with symptoms and have ever had sex, while individuals in VCT sites for HIV testing may have higher perceived risk because of risky sexual behaviors. It is therefore easier to screen and diagnose individuals with syphilis in early stages in these sites than other healthcare settings. Unfortunately, current syphilis screening coverage in STD clinics (40% in 2014) was far below the targeted 80% coverage set by the government [17]. The low coverage was due to insufficient understanding of government syphilis control plan among some healthcare providers, and inadequate knowledge of syphilis morbidity and syphilis testing among patients in STD clinic [17]. When patients have to pay for syphilis tests and/or they are asymptomatic, they do not have motivation for syphilis testing and probably would refuse healthcare providers’ testing offer. Scaling up the screening coverage in STD clinics should be prioritized to prevent and control the syphilis epidemic. Of note, a significant proportion (19%) of city-level variation of early diagnosis rate was attributable to one factor: receiving a syphilis test in STD clinics and VCT sites. Implementation strategies and resource input for screening should therefore be tailored to the local context, especially to improve the inadequate laboratory capacity and human resources necessary for high quality syphilis screening in some areas [10]. This location-population approach, which minimizes the impact of regional variation during policy planning, has been used for HIV prevention in China [24] and in different countries in the world, [25] and could be a useful reference for syphilis screening strategies.
Conversely, syphilis cases identified through testing among non-STD clinic patients or patients undergoing surgery were less likely to be in early diagnosis, which accounted for 14–17% of variance at city-level. Around 60% of diagnosed cases were identified through testing for non-STD clinic patients and patients undergoing surgery, but only 15% of them were in early diagnosis. This was in line with the significant association of delayed diagnosis with individual level factor of syphilis diagnosis in hospitals, and city-level factor of more hospitals per capita. As most of these syphilis cases were patients in the hospital for non-STD-related illnesses, they received routine syphilis screening for infection control in the hospital. Before receiving a test, they were unaware of their syphilis infection due to the absence of genitourinary symptoms. Once screened, they were more likely to be in delayed diagnosis. Passive syphilis screening strategies have been used for controlling the syphilis epidemic in many countries, including the United States [3] and China [26, 27]. It is useful for improving the syphilis diagnosis rate, stopping further disease progression and preventing ongoing transmission from infected individuals [3]. However, these screening programs mainly target at patients in hospitals, who are mostly there for non-STD-related illnesses. This was reflected in our findings that 81% of syphilis cases were diagnosed in a hospital, with only 21% of them in early diagnosis. Our results showed possible limitations of passive screening strategies, and the need for client- or provider-initiated screening strategies to be implemented as a supplement. Provider-initiated testing and counselling (PITC) in response to HIV could be a good example for syphilis screening strategies in hospitals [28]. Healthcare workers in specialist services that symptomatic patients are likely to visit, such as STD, maternal fetal medicine and urology, should take the initiative to recommend symptomatic patients or patients with high risk exposure (including out-patients) for STD testing. These healthcare workers should be trained to identify patients with possible genitourinary symptoms, and to ask about medical and sexual history including sexual partner(s).
We used the reported data for analysis, which was standardized and systematically collected. However, interpretation of results was constrained by some limitations of data. First, a certain proportion of syphilis cases’ disease stages were misclassified, which may affect the outcomes estimation. To minimize potential bias, we have selected surveillance data in recent years (from 2014 to mid-2015), the years with a higher staging accuracy rate. For instance, the accurate diagnostic rate reached 95%, and the syphilis staging accuracy rate ranged from 84 to 100% in Shenzhen in 2013–2014 [29]. Second, constrained by the existing syphilis diagnosis standard, early latent syphilis cases were not able to be separated from late latent syphilis cases. Third, we might underestimated the early diagnosis rate in cities. Even though CBSS collected cases from all institutes, private clinics were under-reported. Therefore, our results were able to accurately reflect the situation reported by public sector healthcare sites but only represent a limited view of private sector facilities. Fourth, we were not able to identify FSW from the reported cases for analysis due to data limitation. Fifth, factors of exposure history and reasons for testing had a significant proportion of missing value, even though complete-case analyses were conducted. Finally, we acknowledged that city with low proportion of early diagnoses could be due to inactive recent syphilis transmission in the place instead of inadequate screening for early diagnosis. The evaluation of effectiveness of screening strategies in each place needs additional information and research such as time-series analysis, which was not the main focus of this study.
Conclusions
To enhance early diagnosis for new syphilis infections, our findings suggested a mixed approach (both compulsory and client/provider-initiated) for syphilis screening in Guangdong Province, and places with similar healthcare settings and facing similar challenges. More resources should be allocated to scale up the screening coverage in STD clinics and VCT sites, the settings with higher chance of identifying cases in early instead of late syphilis. Also, PITC in specialist services that symptomatic patients are most likely to visit should be considered to be implemented in hospitals, which have the highest proportion of syphilis cases being diagnosed. Considering the high heterogeneity of early diagnosis rate in cities and factors attributable to the variation, intervention strategies should be city-specific. As individuals with lower education levels and older individuals were less likely to be in early diagnosis but may be at high risk of exposure to syphilis, further research is needed to understand their STD awareness, and the facilitators and barriers to syphilis testing.
Acknowledgement
NS was supported by Guangdong Provincial Center for Skin Diseases and STI Control and the South China-UNC STD Research Training Center grant (FIC1D43TW009532-01), SESH R01 (NIAID 1R01AI114310) and Fogarty International Center. We thank Mr. Andrew Babbitt for his comments on the manuscript.
The opinions expressed by authors contributing to this journal do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the institutions with which the authors are affiliated.
Funding
This is an unfunded project.
Availability of data and materials
The dataset cannot be included in a public repository because the data are owned by third parties. Access to these data and permission could be inquired through the Guangdong Provincial Center for Skin Diseases and STI Control, China.
Authors’ contributions
SH, NSW and HZ motivated and designed the study. LC, PZ and NSW analyzed the data. LC, PZ, SH and NSW interpreted the results. NSW and SH wrote the article. JDT, BTG LGY, BY critically reviewed the article. All the authors reviewed, edited and approved the article.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Ethics approval and consent to participate
IRB approval was obtained from the Guangdong Provincial Center for Skin Diseases and STI Control, China, and from University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Individual consent for this study was waived.
Abbreviations
- aOR
Adjusted odds ratio
- CBSS
Case-based surveillance system
- FSW
Female sex workers
- IQR
Interquartile range
- MOR
Median odds ratio
- MSM
Men who have sex with men
- OR
Crude odds ratio
- PCV
Proportional change of variance
- PITC
Provider-initiated testing and counselling
- STD
Sexually transmitted disease
- VCT
Voluntary counseling and testing
Contributor Information
Ngai Sze Wong, Email: iseewong@gmail.com.
Shujie Huang, Email: huangshj_jm@126.com.
Heping Zheng, Email: zhhpf@hotmail.com.
Lei Chen, Email: gdpuchenlei@163.com.
Peizhen Zhao, Email: 08tjzpz@163.com.
Joseph D. Tucker, Email: jdtucker@med.unc.edu
Li Gang Yang, Email: yanglg3@hotmail.com.
Beng Tin Goh, Email: beng.goh@bartshealth.nhs.uk.
Bin Yang, Phone: (86) 2087631390, Email: yangbin101@hotmail.com.
References
- 1.Janier M, Hegyi V, Dupin N, Unemo M, Tiplica GS, Potocnik M, French P, Patel R. 2014 European guideline on the management of syphilis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(12):1581–1593. doi: 10.1111/jdv.12734. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Singh AE, Romanowski B. Syphilis: review with emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, and some biologic features. Clin Microbiol Rev. 1999;12(2):187–209. doi: 10.1128/cmr.12.2.187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Workowski KA, Bolan GA, Centers for Disease C, Prevention Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2015;64(RR-03):1–137. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Pathela P, Braunstein SL, Blank S, Shepard C, Schillinger JA. The high risk of an HIV diagnosis following a diagnosis of syphilis: a population-level analysis of New York City men. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(2):281–287. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Marcus U, Ort J, Grenz M, Eckstein K, Wirtz K, Wille A. Risk factors for HIV and STI diagnosis in a community-based HIV/STI testing and counselling site for men having sex with men (MSM) in a large German city in 2011–2012. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:14. doi: 10.1186/s12879-014-0738-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Fu GF, Jiang N, Hu HY, Mahapatra T, Yin YP, Mahapatra S, Wang XL, Chen XS, Babu GR, Xu XQ, et al. The epidemic of HIV, syphilis, chlamydia and gonorrhea and the correlates of sexual transmitted infections among men who have sex with men in Jiangsu, China, 2009. PLoS One. 2015;10(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Burchell AN, Allen VG, Gardner SL, Moravan V, Tan DH, Grewal R, Raboud J, Bayoumi AM, Kaul R, Mazzulli T, et al. High incidence of diagnosis with syphilis co-infection among men who have sex with men in an HIV cohort in Ontario, Canada. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:356. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1098-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Wu X, Tucker JD, Hong F, Messina J, Lan L, Hu Y, Feng T, Emch ME, Liu X, Zhang C, et al. Multilevel and spatial analysis of syphilis in Shenzhen, China, to inform spatially targeted control measures. Sex Transm Infect. 2012;88(5):325–329. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2011-050397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Liu YY, Li Z, Huang N, Li ZW, Zheng RT, Hou JL, Liu DC, Chu TS, Liu B, Tian HQ. Investigation of delayed syphilis diagnosis. China J Leprosy Skin Dis. 2014;6:362–64.
- 10.Tucker JD, Yang LG, Zhu ZJ, Yang B, Yin YP, Cohen MS, Chen XS. Integrated syphilis/HIV screening in China: a qualitative analysis. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:58. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-10-58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lin ZCOZ, Ma YG. A study of health seeking behaviors among 489 STD patients detected by active surveillance. Chin J STD AIDS Prev Control. 2001;7:273–277. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Choi KH, Zheng X, Zhou H, Chen W, Mandel J. Treatment delay and reliance on private physicians among patients with sexually transmitted diseases in China. Int J STD AIDS. 1999;10(5):309–315. doi: 10.1258/0956462991914177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Merlo J, Chaix B, Ohlsson H, Beckman A, Johnell K, Hjerpe P, Råstam L, Larsen K. A brief conceptual tutorial of multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: using measures of clustering in multilevel logistic regression to investigate contextual phenomena. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006;60:290–297. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.029454. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tucker JD, Cohen MS. China’s syphilis epidemic: epidemiology, proximate determinants of spread, and control responses. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011;24(1):50–55. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e32834204bf. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Yang L-G, Tucker JD, Yang B, Shen S-Y, Sun X-F, Chen Y-F, Chen X-S. Primary syphilis cases in Guangdong Province 1995–2008: opportunities for linking syphilis control and regional development. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:793. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-793. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Chen L, Huang S, Hong X, Shen H, Tang W, Yang L, Zheng H, Yang B, Prevention GPCfSDaSCa Epidemiological situation of sexually transmitted diseases in Guangdong Province in 2013. J Diagnosis Therapy Dermato-venereology. 2015;1:62–67. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shen H, Huang S, Wen M, Tan X, Feng L, Chen J, Zheng Y, Zheng H, Yang B, Wang X. Effect analysis of promoting HIV and syphilis testing in Jiangmen, Guangdong. Chin J AIDS STD. 2016;22(1):32–41. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhang W, Du Z, Tang S, Guo P, Ye X, Hao Y. Syphilis in the economic center of South China: results from a real-time, web-based surveillance program. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Guangdong Statistical Yearbook [http://www.gdstats.gov.cn/tjnj/2014/directory.html]. Accessed 27 Mar 2016.
- 20.Merlo J, Yang M, Chaix B, Lynch J, Råstam L. A brief conceptual tutorial on multilevel analysis in social epidemiology: investigating contextual phenomena in different groups of people. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005;59:729–736. doi: 10.1136/jech.2004.023929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Chen Y, Tang ZZ, Shen ZY, Lan GH, Zhang HM, Zhou YJ, Zhu QY, Zhang XJ, Tang S. Investigation on the risk factors for HIV infection among elderly male clients of the commercial female sex-workers in Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, in 2012. Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2013;34(11):1086–1090. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lau JT, Chen R, Wang Q, Diao J, Tsui H, Yuan W. Needs assessment for STD/HIV prevention among patients with sexually transmitted diseases in southern China. Sex Transm Dis. 2003;30(8):600–608. doi: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000081394.94426.7A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Corsenac P, Noel M, Rouchon B, Hoy D, Roth A. Prevalence and sociodemographic risk factors of chlamydia, gonorrhoea and syphilis: a national multicentre STI survey in New Caledonia, 2012. BMJ Open. 2015;5(9) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Lu Y. Innovative strategies for HIV prevention and control on special epidemiology and social mangement in the western China’s ethnic minorities and frontier. J Yunnan Admir Coll. 2012;6:164–166. [Google Scholar]
- 25.UNAIDS . On the fast-track to end AIDS by 2030: focus on location and population. 2015. p. 126. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Syphilis prevention and control planning (2010–2020) in China. report no.: 52. China: Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. 2010.
- 27.Ministry of Health of the People’s Republic of China. Sexually transmitted diseases prevention and management. report no.: 89. China: Ministry of Health of the People's Republic of China. 2012.
- 28.Kennedy CE, Fonner VA, Sweat MD, Okero FA, Baggaley R, O’Reilly KR. Provider-initiated HIV testing and counseling in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. AIDS Behav. 2013;17(5):1571–1590. doi: 10.1007/s10461-012-0241-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lan L, Wu X, Zhang C, Wen L, Tan F, Huang F. Analysis on accurate diagnosis and standardized treatment of reported syphilis cases in Shenzhen. Chin J AIDS STD. 2015;21(7):619–622. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The dataset cannot be included in a public repository because the data are owned by third parties. Access to these data and permission could be inquired through the Guangdong Provincial Center for Skin Diseases and STI Control, China.