Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 31.
Published in final edited form as: Circulation. 2016 Dec 7;135(5):426–439. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.024825

Table 6.

Reclassification across diastolic dysfunction score using ARIC-based reference limits from diastolic dysfunction score categories based on guideline recommended cutpoints in participants ≥65 years of age in the Copenhagen City Heart Study.

Diastolic score based on ARIC-based limits
0 1 2 3 Total
Diastolic score based on Guideline limits 0 71 (100.0%)
5.0 (3.5–7.1)
71
5.0 (3.5–7.1)
1 289 (81.6%)
5.1 (4.3–6.1)
60 (17.0%)
8.5 (6.3–11.5)
5 (1.4%)
6.8 (2.2–21.2)
354
5.7 (4.9–6.6)
2 53 (40.8%)
4.2 (2.7–6.4)
71 (54.6%)
7.1 (5.2–9.6)
6 (4.6%)
3.4 (0.8–13.7)
130
5.6 (4.4–7.2)
3 4 (50.0%)
11.9 (4.5–31.7)
4 (50.0%)
18.2 (6.8–48.4)
8
14.4 (7.2–28.7)
Total 360
5.1 (4.4–5.9)
113
6.3 (4.9–8.1)
80
7.3 (5.5–9.7)
10
7.5 (3.4–16.6)
563

Values are presented as absolute numbers and percent reclassified. Event rates per 100 person-years for death or incident HF hospitalization are presented in italics.