Skip to main content
Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry logoLink to Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry
. 1959 Dec 1;63A(3):275–278. doi: 10.6028/jres.063A.022

A Preliminary List of Levels and g-Values for the First Spectrum of Thorium (Th I)

Romuald Zalubas
PMCID: PMC5287040  PMID: 31216136

Abstract

The present state of the analysis of the first spectrum of thorium (Th I) is discussed briefly. Even and odd levels are listed in tables 1 and 2. The low even levels form terms arising from the configurations 6d2 7s2 and 6d3 7s. The Th I standard wavelengths that fit into the known level arrays are presented in table 3.

1. Introduction

Work on thorium spectra was started at the National Bureau of Standards by C. C. Kiess as early as 1926. His data are included in the present work, but have never been published separately.

In 1955 it was decided to obtain a new description and analysis of the Th I spectrum at this Bureau, because electrodeless lamps were available [l].1 The description of the thorium spectra will be published soon, and will include an account of the experimental procedures as well as the history of the thorium spectra. Therefore, only the work pertaining to the analysis of Th I will be mentioned here.

In 1946 Ph. Schuurmans [2] published a list of the Th I levels which he had discovered. Five of his even levels (0.00, 2869.18, 5563.15, 6362.39, and 7502.25), and 23 of his odd levels are confirmed by the present analysis. He indicated, also, that 6d2 7s2 3F2 is the ground state of Th I. His work was based on Zeeman data for 48 Th I lines by Lier [3], and the list of Th I wavelengths by Fred [4].

2. Procedure

The new description of thorium spectra contains 16,000 lines between 2000 and 11500 A. About 1,000 Zeeman patterns have been observed and measured, of which 400 are sufficiently well resolved for the determination of g-values. The chief difficulty in securing Th I Zeeman data is that the lines are heavily masked by strong Th II patterns. Therefore, two sets of plates had to be measured, one of strong and the other of weak exposures, in order to resolve a greater number of Th I patterns.

In the course of the analysis, Zeeman data from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology became available [5] for about two dozen additional lines. Th I and Th II lines have been separated by using the following criteria: (a) relative intensities in tube and spark exposures, (b) relative intensities of n and p components of unresolved Zeeman patterns as compared with a no-field exposure, (c) resolved Zeeman patterns, and (d) classified lines of Th II [6], In this way 12,000 lines have been attributed to Th I.

The vacuum wave numbers were calculated on an electronic computer by using Edlén’s formula. The analysis has been substantially speeded up by the use of the computer. Bozman and Coleman [7] have written the codes with which the levels were searched by the computer from known intervals.

3. Results

Table 1 contains the even energy levels starting with 6d2 7s2 3F2 as the ground state zero. The columns of this table read as follows: (1) electron configuration of the term; (2) designation of the term; (3) the inner quantum number or J-value of the level; (4) value of the atomic energy level in cm−1; (5) g-value as observed; (6) theoretical Landé g-value in LS-coupling. The electron configurations and term assignments of even levels appear to be fairly definite, and agree well with preliminary theoretical calculations of Trees [8].

Table 1.

Even energy levels of Th I

Config. Design J Level Obs. g LS. g






6d27s2 a 3F 2   0.00 0.741 0.667
3   2869.26 1.074 1.083
4   4961.66 1.212 1.250
a 3P 0   2558.06 0.00    0/0
1   3865.47 1.477 1.500
2   3687.99 1.256 1.500
a 1D 2   7280.13 1.189 1.000
a 1G 4   8111.00 1.08   1.000
6d3(4F)7s a5 F 1   5563.14 0.062 0.000
2   6362.40 1.014 1.000
3   7502.29 1.253 1.250
6d3(4F)7s a 5F 4   8800.25 1.310 1.350
5   9804.81 1.366 1.400
6d3(4P)7s a 5P 1 11601.03 2.41   2.500
2 11802.94 1.721 1.833
3 12847.97 1.39   1.667
6d3 (2G)7s a 3G 3 13088.57 1.04   0.750
4 13297.42 0.98   1.050
5 14204.30 1.13   1.200
6d3 (2D)7s a 3D 1 13962.50 0.76   0.500
6d3(2H)7s a 3H 4 15493.23 0.92   0.800

Table 2 contains the known odd levels and has the following columns: (1) inner quantum number J, (2) value of energy level, and (3) observed g-value. Doubtful levels or those that do not have confirmation from Zeeman data are not included in this table.

Table 2.

Odd energy levels of Th I

J Level Obs. g



2 14032.10 1.15 
3 15166.90 1.06 
2 16217.48 1.10 
3 16671.35 (1.18)
2 17224.30 1.07 
1 17354.64 0.51 
3 17411.22 1.12 
2 17847.10 1.17 
4 18053.64 …………. 
3 18069.10 1.16 
0 18382.82 0.00 
1 18614.33 1.41 
4 18809.92 …………. 
3 18930.29 0.99 
2 19039.15 1.11 
3 19503.15 1.10 
2 19516.98 1.37 
1 19817.17 1.57 
4 19948.43 (1.29)
3 20214.93 1.17 
1 20423.50 1.42 
2 20522.72 0.84 
4 20566.69 …………. 
0 20724.37 0.00 
1 20737.28 1.42 
2 20922.13 1.16 
4 21120.45 (1.03)
3 21165.10 1.31 
2 21252.62 0.67 
4 21539.59 1.19 
1 21668.96 1.56 
2 21738.04 (0.53)
3 22141.61 1.10 
2 22248.95 1.13 
3 22339.00 1.01 
1 22396.82 1.54 
2 22508.06 1.38 
3 22669.90 1.22 
3 22855.30 1.09 
1 22877.51 0.64 
1 23049.46 1.42 
2 23093.98 1.32 
1 23481.37 0.85 
3 23521.06 1.08 
2 23603.52 1.39 
4 23655.16 (1.20)
1 23741.07 (0.71)
2 23752.67 1.11 
2 24182.41 (1.27)
4 24202.57 1.39 
2 24307.75 1.51 
2 24381.34 1.25 
3 24421.08 …………. 
3 24561.65 1.20 
5 24701.06 1.15 
3 24769.72 1.15 
1 24838.92 0.76 
3 24981.10 1.07 
3 25321.95 1.35 
4 25355.60 0.98 
3 25442.69 1.10 
1 25526.26 1.08 
2 25703.40 1.03 
1 25809.30 1.59 
4 25877.52 (1.07)
3 26036.36 (0.96)
4 26048.54 1.13 
3 26096.98 …………. 
2 26113.27 0.99 
1 26287.05 0.72 
2 26363.11 1.02 
4 26384.94 (1.07)
3 26508.03 1.08 
4 26790.43 1.14 
3 26878.16 0.88 
3 26995.78 1.18 
2 27061.40 (0.94)
1 27087.99 (1.14)
3 27260.17 1.12 
4 27266.03 1.12 
3 27317.39 (1.07)
3 27670.95 1.26 
2 27674.33 1.09 
2 27784.37 0.85 
5 27852.75 1.26 
4 27948.61 1.28 
1 28024.69 1.03 
2 28347.55 (1.55)
1 28372.69 1.79 
2 28513.32 (1.10)
3 28589.29 1.17 
1 28649.15 1.11 
3 28676.29 1.02 
3 28884.97 1.17 
2 28917.96 0.95 
4 28932.65 1.09 
5 29050.77 1.14 
1 29157.10 0.89 
3 29157.88 1.17 
1 29197.33 1.16 
2 29252.82 1.00 
2 29419.25 1.78 
1 29640.28 0.98 
3 29686.37 1.27 
3 29744.52 1.06 
2 29853.14 0.92 
3 30017.10 1.15 
3 30255.45 1.12 
1 30281.04 (1.48)
4 30517.42 1.46 
2 30553.29 1.05 
1 30723.82 1.07 
3 30761.72 1.21 
2 30813.00 0.93 
1 30928.73 0.99 
3 30990.52 1.07 
3 31283.12 1.13 
3 31523.96 1.11 
2 31599.36 1.18 
1 31712.73 1.16 
3 31780.87 1.17 
2 31870.08 0.93 
4 31953.46 1.06 
1 32080.39 0.80 
3 32197.12 1.13 
3 32285.23 (1.09)
4 32439.05 (1.20)
2 32575.41 0.78 
1 32665.59 (0.83)
4 32862.51 (1.16)
3 33043.35 1.15 
1 33161.80 (1.32)
4 33270.59 (1.16)
2 33297.13 (1.23)
3 33591.20 1.00 
3 33800.68 1.16 
5 33844.96 1.10 
4 33956.93 …………. 
4 34001.33 1.04 
2 34371.82 (1.32)
1 34590.97 (1.48)
3 34704.42 (1.13)
5 35081.03 (1.08)
4 35131.22 1.26 
5 35273.95 1.18 
4 35351.44 (1.27)
2 35533.34 0.83 
4 36062.87 1.11 
2 36189.01 (1.98)
5 36275.19 1.00 
1 36361.49 1.11 
4 36382.66 (1.07)
5 36837.96 1.18 
3 36871.99 …………. 
5 37008.75 1.12 
2 37149.18 1.05 
4 37605.80 1.09 
3 38216.95 …………. 
3 39611.56 (1.25)

The g-values of even levels are the means from 5 to 40 determinations, those for odd levels have from 1 to 6 determinations. The g-values given to three decimal places are derived from 10 or more observations.

By comparison with the ionization potentials of neighboring elements, one can expect the ionization potential of Th I to be between 4 and 5.5 ev. In order to establish levels of configurations 6p27s ns and 6d3ns with a higher n-value, infrared lines beyond the photographic region must be observed.

Only a little more than half of the stronger lines are accounted for at present. The remaining lines, and about 100 well resolved Zeeman patterns indicate that there should exist another system of terms which is probably connected with the known levels by a small number of intercombinations. This idea is supported by the existence of two sets of terms in Th II [6]. The work on the Th I analysis will be continued in this laboratory.

4. Secondary Standards

Simultaneously with this work, interferometric measurements of thorium secondary standards have been made by Meggers and Stanley [9]. They have published interferometric wavelengths for 222 thorium lines of which 46 are classified as Th II and 107 are now classified as Th I. Because these lines test the accuracy of the values of energy levels, they are given in table 3 for Th I.

Table 3.

Classified standards of Th I

Wavelength in air Relative intensity Classification



  A
6943.6112 600 a 5F524204°
6829.0355 150 a 5F322143°
6756.4528 250 a 3P017351°
6727.4585 200 a 5F120421°
6678.7076 30 a 1D222242°
6662.2694 250 a 5F322502°
6591.4849 100 a 3F215163°
6588.5398 200 a 3P119032°
6554.1605 100 a 3F420214°
6531.3423 400 a 5F221661°
6490.7378 120 a 5F424204°
6413.6152 200 a 3G428883°
6411.8996 250 a 5F323092°
6342.8600 300 a 5F424563°
6257.4237 100 a 5F222333°
6224.5275 100 a 3F318933°
6207.2205 160 a 5F121661°
6191.9054 100 a 5F222502°
6182.6219 400 a 3F319032°
6151.9932 120 a 5F323752°
6049.0510 100 a 3P220213°
6037.6978 140 a 3P120421°
6007.0725 180 a 5F425443°
5975.0656 250 a 5F223092°
5973.6651 250 a 3P220421°
5938.8255 140 a 5F122391°
5885.7017 120 a 5F526794°
5804.1414 300 a 3F217222°
5789.6439 200 a 5F324763°
5760.5510 600 a 3F217351°
5725.3887 250 a 5F527264°
5615.3202 350 a 3P121661°
5587.0265 500 a 3F422853°
5579.3585 300 a 5F123481°
5573.3538 350 a 1G426044°
5558.3426 400 a 1G426093°
5548.1761 300 a 5F224382°
5539.2615 400 a 5F527855°
5509.9937 300 a 5F527944°
5499.2552 250 a 3P020731°
5431.1116 300 a 5F224763°
5417.4856 200 a 3P222143°
5386.6109 300 a 3F423523°
5343.5813 500 a 3P222391°
5326.9755 400 a 1G426873°
5258.3609 300 a 3P1 22871°
5231.1596 900 a 3P021661°
5158.6041 700 a 3F322242°
5002.0968 400 a 3F322853°
4894.9546 350 a 3F220421°
4878.733   200 a 3P023041°
4865.4769 350 a 3G433845°
4840.8426 400 a 3F323523°
4789.3867 300 a 3P224563°
4766.6001 200 a 3P124831°
4703.9897 500 a 3F221252°
4686.1944 1200 a 3F324204°
4668.1720 700 a 5F328912°
4663.2021 200 a 3F324302°
4595.4198 600 a 3P225443°
4555.813   500 a 3P125801°
4493.3335 1200 a 3F222242°
4482.1694 300 a 3F427264°
4458.0018 600 a 3P226112°
4408.8828 600 a 3P226362°
4378.1768 500 a 3F325702°
4374.1244 600 a 3F222853°
4315.2544 400 a 3F326033°
4257.4959 700 a 3F223481°
4235.4635 600 a 3F223602°
4208.8907 3000 a 3F223752°
4193.0165 900 a 1G431954°
4158.5351 800 a 5F533845°
4115.7587 800 a 5F129852°
4100.3412 1100 a 3F224382°
4067.4507 400 a 3F327442°
4059.2525 1000 a 5F230993°
4043.3945 800 a 3F429683°
4036.0475 1800 a 3F224763°
4012.4950 2000 a 3F327782°
3923.7993 400 a 3F328342°
3869.6635 600 a 5F232193°
3839.6941 2500 a 3F226033°
3828.3845 3200 a 3F226112°
3803.0750 4000 a 3F226281°
3771.3703 1500 a 3F226503°
3762.9345 1200 a 3P230253°
3727.9022 800 a 3F329683°
3719.4345 3000 a 3F226873°
3700.9780 300 a 5F132572°
3692.5661 1200 a 3P230763°
3682.4861 1000 a 3F330013°
3669.9687 750 a 1G435354°
3656.6936 1000 a 3F330202°
3642.2487 2200 a 3F227442°
3622.7951 800 a 3P231283°
3612.4271 1400 a 3F227672°
3598.1196 2000 a 3F227782°
3584.1753 800 a 3F330763°
3576.5573 1000 a 1G436064°
3567.2635 1200 a 3F228021°
3544.0176 1500 a 5F437005°
3518.4033 1000 a 3F331283°
3451.7019 900 a 3P232651°
3442.5785 800 a 3F434004°
3405.5575 1400 a 3P233043°
3396.7273 1400 a 3P133292°
3380.8595 900 a 3F332434°
3330.4765 1800 a 3F230013°
3309.3650 800 a 3F230202°
3304.2381 3000 a 3F230253°

Acknowledgments

This investigation could not have been carried on without the help of my associates in the Spectroscopy Section. C. C. Kiess initiated the program, contributed his wavelength measurements, and has supervised the work throughout. C. H. Corliss and W. R. Bozman furnished the electrodeless tubes. The use of the digital computer for the analysis has been made possible by the help of W. R. Bozman and C. D. Coleman. R. E. Trees has assisted greatly with theoretical interpretation. It is a pleasure to express my appreciation of the very generous assistance they have all provided.

Footnotes

1

Figures in brackets indicate the literature references at the end of this paper.

5. References

  • 1.Kiess CC, Zalubas R. Spectroscopy Symposium at Argonne National Laboratory 1956. J Opt Soc Am. 1959;49:512. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ph. Schuurmans, Dissertation, Amsterdam (1946).
  • 3.Lier JN. Dissertation Univ. Amsterdam: 1939. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Fred MS. Astrophys J. 1938;87:176. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.See; Charles GW. A compilation of data on some spectra of thorium. ORNL-2319; 1958. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McNally JR, Jr, Harrison GR, Park HB. J Opt Soc Am. 1942;32:334. [Google Scholar]; McNally JR., Jr. J Opt Soc Am. 1945;35:390. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Bozman WR, Coleman CD. J Opt Soc Am. 1959;49:511. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.R. E. Trees, Private communication, unpublished material (1959)
  • 9.Meggers WF, Stanley RW. J Research NBS. 1958;61:95. RP2891. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards. Section A, Physics and Chemistry are provided here courtesy of National Institute of Standards and Technology

RESOURCES