Abstract
Dieback in strawberry (Seolhyang cultivar) was first observed during the nursery season (June to September) in the Nonsan area of Korea in the years 2012 and 2013. Initial disease symptoms included dieback on runners, as well as black rot on roots, followed by wilting and eventually blackened, necrotic discoloration in the crowns of daughter plants. A fungus isolated from the diseased roots, runners, and crowns is close to Lasiodiplodia theobromae based on morphological characteristics. Analysis of a combined dataset assembled from sequences of the internal transcribed spacer and translation elongation factor 1-alpha genes grouped nine fungal isolates with the type strain of L. theobromae. The isolates showed strong pathogenicity on strawberry cultivars Kumhyang, Seolhyang, and Akihimae, fulfilling Koch's postulates. Based on these results, the pathogen responsible for dieback on strawberry plants in Korea was identified as L. theobromae.
Keywords: Dieback, ITS, Lasiodiplodia, Strawberry, tef1
Strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) is widely cultivated in Korea, occupying some 6,403 ha in 2015, and it is one of the most important fruits grown in the country. During the nursery season, strawberries are grown in plastic houses, using raised beds containing commercial substrates such as cocopeat, peat moss and perlite, loamy sand, and expanded rice hulls [1]. In nursery fields, from June to September in the years 2012 and 2013, severe dieback and black rot on runners and daughter plants of the Seolhyang strawberry cultivar were observed in Nonsan, Chungnam province. Disease symptoms began as dieback on runners and black rot on roots, which led to wilting and eventually to blackened, necrotic discoloration of the crowns of daughter plants. Approximately 5~10% of the plants wilted and eventually died. In particular, the first- and second-generation daughter plants, whose roots dried after temporary irrigation with a short watering period for rooting, were shown to suffer from a high rate of dieback. This disease incidence was highest in August and in nursery beds using commercial substrates and loamy sand.
Dieback in strawberry was first reported to be caused by the pathogen Lasiodiplodia theobromae in Turkey [2]. In Korea, L. theobromae was reported for the first time in mango by Hong et al. [3]. L. theobromae occurs mainly in tropical and subtropical regions and can cause stem rot, dieback, and cankers on important commercial crops such as almond [4], blueberry [5], cocoa [6], grapevines [7], mango [3,8,9], olive [10], and peanut [11]. Lasiodiplodia, a member of Botryosphaeriaceae, is a cosmopolitan fungus [12] and a soil-borne saprophyte [13]. To establish the taxonomy of this genus, molecular DNA-based approaches have been widely used [14], and phylogenetic studies of multiple genes including internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1) have revealed cryptic species within the L. theobromae complex [8].
We conducted morphological and phylogenetic analyses using ITS and tef1 genes to determine the potential causal agent of dieback, and to confirm which isolates were pathogens to strawberry plants.
In the strawberry plants investigated in the present study, disease symptoms began as dieback on runners and black rot on roots, which led to wilting and eventually to blackened, necrotic discoloration in the crown of daughter plants (Fig. 1). Ten fungal strains isolated from the Seolhyang strawberry plants were examined. In 2012, we isolated four strains from roots (LT120701, LT120702, LT120901, and LT120902) and three strains from crowns and runners (LT120903, LT120906, and LT120907). In 2013, the strains LT130701, LT130702, and LT131001 were isolated from crowns.
Fig. 1. Symptoms of strawberry dieback observed in a nursery field in Korea. A, Wilt and dieback of daughter plants and runners; B, Blackened, necrotic discoloration in the crown; C, Dieback in leaves; D, Black rot on roots.
The first growth phase for the isolates LT120901, LT120903, and LT120907, documented on potato dextrose agar (PDA), gave rise to white colonies, followed by a dense, black mycelium (Fig. 2A). Each organ was measured four times, and at least seven organs were measured each time. Pycnidia of dark brown to black color were formed after 30 days of culture (Fig. 2B). Paraphyses were hyaline, cylindrical, septate, and not branched, and they were round at the apex, up to 55-µm-long, and 3~4 µm wide (Table 1, Fig. 2C). The length/width ratio of the conidia was 1.94. The conidia of isolates were unicellular when young, and 1-septate, thick-walled, and ellipsoid to obovoid in shape when mature, with dimensions of 26.22 ± 5.86 × 13.52 ± 3.04 µm (Table 1, Fig 2D). L. theobromae isolated from mango in Korea [3] had conidia with a size of 17.5~26.8 × 12.3~17.1 µm, and were either unicellular or 1-septate. The shape and size of the conidia reported by Hong et al. [3] were thus similar to the present observations. Additionally, the morphology of the strains isolated from strawberry was similar to that of L. theobromae as reported by Alves et al. [15].
Fig. 2. Colony and conidial morphology of Lasiodiplodia theobromae. A, Colony morphology of a 10-day-old sample; B, Pycnidia; C, Paraphyses; D, Immature conidia (whitish) with thin walls, and mature conidia (dark brown) with septa and thick walls (scale bars: B = 0.5 mm, C = 10 µm, D = 20 µm).
Table 1. Morphological characteristics of fungal isolates obtained in this study.
L/W, length/width.
Temperatures suitable for growth were determined using the LT120901 and LT130701 isolates. Each isolate was incubated in the dark at 15℃, 20℃, 25℃, 30℃, 35℃, and 40℃ on PDA, and growth rates (mm/day) were then measured for each isolate. The mycelia of the isolates grew at temperatures between 15℃ and 40℃, and the optimal growth temperature was 30℃ (Fig. 3); this agrees with one previous study [16], and is very similar to another that reported maximum radial growth of L. theobromae at 29.4℃ [17].
Fig. 3. Effect of temperature on mycelial growth in Lasiodiplodia theobromae.
For molecular phylogenetic analysis, we sequenced nine of the strains isolated from the strawberry plants in the present study, and compared them with ex-type sequences of Lasiodiplodia species retrieved from GenBank (Table 2). Genomic DNA was extracted using the method of Park et al. [18]. The ITS and tef1 genes were amplified to identify each strain at the species level. The PCR amplifications of ITS and tef1 were performed using ITS5 and ITS4 [19] and EF1-728F and EF1-986R [20], respectively. Each PCR reaction was performed on a CFX96 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) under the PCR conditions described by Crous et al. [21]. PCR products were purified using the PCRquick-spin PCR Product Purification Kit (iNtRON BioTechnology, Seongnam, Korea). The PCR amplicons were sequenced at Bioneer Corporation (Chungwon, Korea). Sequences were edited using MEGA 5 software [22] and aligned using the default settings of MAFFT v7 [23]. A neighbor-joining tree using a combined data set (ITS + tef1) was constructed in MEGA 5 using the Kimura 2-parameter model and 1,000 bootstrap replicates. ITS and tef1 gene sequences from the isolates LT120701, LT120702, LT120907, and LT120901 were deposited in GenBank under accession Nos. KX506781~KX506788.
Table 2. Reference sources for the Lasiodiplodia isolates used in this study.
T, ex-type.
Based on the combined dataset of ITS and tef1 sequences, the Korean isolates formed a monophyletic group with L. theobromae CBS 164.96 (type strain) and CBS 111530 with 92% bootstrap support (Fig. 4). The isolates and L. theobromae showed 99.8~100% sequence similarity for ITS and 99.7~100% for tef1. Although L. theobromae has been previously isolated from diseased strawberry in Turkey, there was no report of this disease in Korea. All Korean isolates related to dieback were determined to be L. theobromae based on these morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses.
Fig. 4. Phylogenetic tree of Lasiodiplodia isolates from strawberry plants in Korea and related species based on a neighbor-joining analysis of a combined internal transcribed spacer and translation elongation factor 1-alpha dataset. Numbers beside each branch represent bootstrap values obtained after a bootstrap test with 1,000 replications. Bar indicates the number of nucleotide substitutions.
Three of the isolated pathogens (LT120701, LT120901, and LT131001) were prepared in a suspension at 1 × 105 conidia/mL, and daughter plants of the Seolhyang strawberry cultivar were drenched with 50mL of conidia suspension. A pathogenicity test was conducted using six daughter plants per isolate. The inoculated plants were sealed in plastic boxes with wet paper towels. These plants were incubated at 25℃ and 100% relative humidity for three days. After three days, the inoculated plants were transferred to a greenhouse. Disease index and severity on each plant were rated after 10 days. Disease index was rated using a 0~3 scale, where 0 = no symptoms, 1 = one leaf wilted, 2 = two or more leaves wilted, and 3 = necrosis in the crown. Disease severity was measured as the percentage of wilted plants out of the total number of plants. All three isolates caused disease symptoms on healthy strawberry plants, and the identical pathogen was re-isolated from the inoculated plants. Non-inoculated plants showed no symptoms.
To examine the resistance of strawberry plants to L. theobromae, the cultivars Akihimae, Jukhyang, Kumhyang, Maehyang, Redpearl, Santa, Seolhyang, and Sukhyang were used. Three daughter plants of each cultivar were subjected to pathogenicity tests carried out in the same manner as described above. The cultivars Kumhyang, Seolhyang, and Akihimae were found to be highly susceptible to L. theobromae, whereas Jukhyang and Sukhyang did not show high disease susceptibility (Table 3). A different pathogenicity test of L. theobromae on strawberry plants [2] revealed that the strawberry cultivar Festival, which is grown in the United States and in Central and South America, developed wilting and dieback symptoms. In Korea, the Seolhynag cultivar is widespread, constituting up to 81.3% of all cultivated varieties, so dieback caused by L. theobromae is an issue that requires considerable attention from the strawberry nursery industry.
Table 3. Pathogenicity test of fungal isolates on different strawberry cultivars.
aDisease index: 0, no symptoms; 1, one leaf wilted; 2, two or more leaves wilted; and 3, necrosis in the crown.
bDisease severity: the percentage of wilted plants out of the total number of plants.
cMeans followed by the same letter are not significantly different (p = 0.05) according to Duncan's multiple range test.
References
- 1.Park GS, Nam MH, Choi JM. The effect of expanded rice hulls as a root substrate on the suppression of anthracnose crown rot in strawberry. Korean J Hort Sci Technol. 2016;34:242–248. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yildiz A, Benlioglu K, Benlioglu HS. First report of strawberry dieback caused by Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Plant Dis. 2014;98:1579. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-13-1192-PDN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hong SK, Lee SY, Choi HW, Lee YK, Joa JH, Shim H. Occurrence of stem-end rot on mango fruits caused by Lasiodiplodia theobromae in Korea. Plant Pathol J. 2012;28:455. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen SF, Morgan D, Beede RH, Michailides TJ. First report of Lasiodiplodia theobromae associated with stem canker of almond in California. Plant Dis. 2013;97:994. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-12-1033-PDN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Wright AF, Harmon PF. Identification of species in the Botryosphaeriaceae family causing stem blight on southern highbush blueberry in Florida. Plant Dis. 2010;94:966–971. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-94-8-0966. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mbenoun M, Momo Zeutsa EH, Samuels G, Nsouga Amougou F, Nyasse S. Dieback due to Lasiodiplodia theobromae, a new constraint to cocoa production in Cameroon. Plant Pathol. 2008;57:381. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Úrbez-Torres JR, Leavitt GM, Guerrero JC, Guevara J, Gubler WD. Identification and pathogenicity of Lasiodiplodia theobromae and Diplodia seriata, the causal agents of bot canker disease of grapevines in Mexico. Plant Dis. 2008;92:519–529. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-92-4-0519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ismail AM, Girvilleri G, Polizzi G, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Lombard L. Lasiodiplodia species associated with dieback disease of mango (Mangifera indica) in Egypt. Australas Plant Pathol. 2012;41:649–660. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Marques MW, Lima NB, de Morais MA, Jr, Barbosa MA, Souza BO, Michereff SJ, Phillips AJ, Câmara MP. Species of Lasiodiplodia associated with mango in Brazil. Fungal Divers. 2013;61:181–193. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Úrbez-Torres JR, Peduto F, Vossen PM, Krueger WH, Gubler WD. Olive twig and branch dieback: etiology, incidence, and distribution in California. Plant Dis. 2013;97:231–244. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-04-12-0390-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Phipps PM, Porter DM. Collar rot of peanut caused by Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Plant Dis. 1998;82:1205–1209. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.1998.82.11.1205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Burgess TI, Barber PA, Mohali S, Pegg G, de Beer W, Wingfield MJ. Three new Lasiodiplodia spp. from the tropics, recognized based on DNA sequence comparisons and morphology. Mycologia. 2006;98:423–435. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.98.3.423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson TH. Compendium of soil fungi. New York: Academic Press; 1980. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Crous PW, Groenewald JZ. Hosts, species and genotypes: opinions versus data. Australas Plant Pathol. 2005;34:463–470. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Alves A, Crous PW, Correia A, Phillips AJ. Morphological and molecular data reveal cryptic speciation in Lasiodiplodia theobromae. Fungal Divers. 2008;28:1–13. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Úrbez-Torres JR, Bruez E, Hurtado J, Gubler WD. Effect of temperature on conidial germination of Botryosphaeriaceae species infecting grapevines. Plant Dis. 2010;94:1476–1484. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-06-10-0423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pitt WM, Sosnowski MR, Huang R, Qiu Y, Steel CC, Savocchia S. Evaluation of fungicides for the management of Botryosphaeria canker of grapevines. Plant Dis. 2012;96:1303–1308. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-11-11-0998-RE. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Park MS, Seo GS, Bae KS, Yu SH. Characterization of Trichoderma spp. associated with green mold of oyster mushroom by PCR-RFLP and sequence analysis of ITS regions of rDNA. Plant Pathol J. 2005;21:229–236. [Google Scholar]
- 19.White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, editors. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego (CA): Academic Press; 1990. pp. 315–322. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Carbone I, Kohn LM. A method for designing primer sets for speciation studies in filamentous ascomycetes. Mycologia. 1999;91:553–556. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Crous PW, Slippers B, Wingfield MJ, Rheeder J, Marasas WF, Philips AJ, Alves A, Burgess T, Barber P, Groenewald JZ. Phylogenetic lineages in the Botryosphaeriaceae. Stud Mycol. 2006;55:235–253. doi: 10.3114/sim.55.1.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. 2011;28:2731–2739. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30:772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]







