Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: JAMA Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 1;74(2):179–188. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.3723

Fluid intelligence and psychiatric disorders in a population representative sample of US adolescents

Katherine M Keyes 1,2, Jonathan Platt 1, Alan S Kaufman 3, Katie A McLaughlin 4
PMCID: PMC5288266  NIHMSID: NIHMS843355  PMID: 28030746

Abstract

Importance

Despite long-standing interest in the association of psychiatric disorders with intelligence, few population-based studies of psychiatric disorders have assessed intelligence.

Objectives

To investigate the association of fluid intelligence with past-year and lifetime psychiatric disorders, disorder age-of-onset, and disorder severity in a nationally-representative sample of U.S. adolescents.

Design

Dual-frame national sample of adolescents ascertained from schools and households from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication-Adolescent Supplement, collected 2001–2004.

Setting

Face-to-face household interviews with adolescents and questionnaires from parents.

Participants

The sample included 10,073 adolescents with valid data on fluid intelligence.

Exposures

DSM-IV mental disorders were assessed with the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview, and included a broad range of fear, distress, behavior, substance use and other disorders. Disorder severity was measured with the Sheehan Disability Scale.

Main Outcomes

Fluid intelligence quotient (IQ) measured with Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, normed within the sample by six-month age groups.

Results

Lower mean IQ was observed among adolescents with past-year bipolar disorder (predicted Mean [M]=94.2, p<0.01), attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (M=96.3, p<0.01), oppositional defiant disorder (M=97.3, p<0.01), conduct disorder (M=97.1, p=0.02) substance disorders (M=96.5–97.6, p=0.02 to <0.01) and specific phobia (M=97.1, p<0.01) after adjustment for a wide range of potential confounders. Intelligence was not associated with post-traumatic stress disorder, eating disorders, and anxiety disorders other than specific phobia, and was positively associated with major depression. Associations of fluid intelligence with lifetime disorders that had remitted were attenuated compared to past-year disorders, with the exception of separation anxiety disorder. Across disorders, higher disorder severity was associated with lower fluid intelligence.

Conclusions

Numerous psychiatric disorders are associated with reductions in fluid intelligence; associations are generally small in magnitude. Stronger associations of current than past disorders with intelligence suggest that active symptoms of psychopathology interfere with cognitive functioning, although longitudinal studies are needed to determine the extent to which changes in fluid intelligence precede or follow the onset of psychiatric disorders. Early identification and treatment of children with mental disorders in school settings is critical to promote academic achievement and long-term success.

Keywords: intelligence, psychopathology, mental disorders, adolescence, bipolar, conduct disorder, PTSD

Introduction

Many forms of psychopathology involve disruptions in cognitive functioning. These encompass attention, memory, language processing, and executive functions.17 Given these patterns, there has been long-standing interest in the association of psychiatric disorders with intelligence.

Intelligence is a complex construct that has inspired voluminous literatures regarding its definition, measurement, and implications. Modern conceptualizations typically acknowledge a general intelligence factor (often referred to as g) as well as narrower, more specific abilities (e.g., processing speed, visuospatial reasoning, working memory).810 The specific abilities encompassing intelligence continue to be debated,11,12 but a widely-accepted model of cognitive abilities distinguishes between fluid and crystallized intelligence as two primary components.13 Fluid intelligence reflects reasoning and the ability to solve novel problems; crystallized intelligence reflects knowledge and skills that are the result of experience and learning.14 Analysis of the structure of cognitive abilities underlying intelligence suggests that fluid reasoning loads most strongly onto the generalized intelligence factor15 and is indistinguishable from g.16

To what extent are psychiatric disorders associated with fluid intelligence? Modern examination of intelligence and psychopathology has been primarily limited to relatively small, clinical samples. Poor performance on intelligence tests has been documented in individuals with ADHD,1721 conduct disorder and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD),2229 and PTSD.5,6,30 Associations of intelligence with depression and anxiety disorders are inconsistent across studies.31,32,33,22,34 The degree to which intelligence is associated with most psychiatric disorders remains an open question, given inherent biases in studies comprised of clinical samples and the lack of population-based studies that measure intelligence.

One particularly important question is whether associations of intelligence with psychiatric disorders reflect that low intelligence is a risk factor for psychopathology or that changes in cognitive functioning are a consequence of developing a psychiatric disorder. While prospective data are optimal to adjudicate between these possibilities, to date such evidence exists only for disruptive behavior problems, indicating that low intelligence prospectively predicts life-course persistent antisocial behavior, particularly for males.25,35 If low intelligence associated with other psychiatric disorders reflects a consequence rather than risk factor for psychopathology, we would expect associations of intelligence to be stronger among individuals who currently meet criteria for a disorder as compared to those who have met criteria in the past but do not currently. In contrast, if low IQ is a risk factor for psychiatric disorders, we should observe associations of similar magnitude for both current and past disorders with IQ.

In the current report, we investigate the association of fluid intelligence with a wide range of psychiatric disorders in a nationally representative sample of US adolescents. We present intelligence estimates for adolescents who currently meet criteria for fear, distress, behavior, and substance disorders as well as for those who met criteria in the past but not currently, and further examine associations between fluid intelligence and psychiatric disorders by age-of-onset and severity of disorder.

Methods

Sample

Data were drawn from the National Comorbidity Survey Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A), a nationally representative, face-to-face survey of 13–18 year olds sampled from the continental United States in 2001–2004.36 The sample was selected through a dual-frame design, with adolescents recruited from both schools and households.3739 The sample included 10,148 English-speaking adolescents, 10,073 (99.3%) with valid outcome data that were analyzed in the present study. Sample weights were created based on the 2000 Census. More details are on NCS-A sampling and weighting procedures are available elsewhere.3840

Written informed consent from adults and assent from adolescents were obtained. Each participant received $50 for participation. The Human Subjects Committees of Harvard Medical School and the University of Michigan approved recruitment and consent procedures; the Institutional Review Board of Columbia University approved the current analysis.

Measures

Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT).41,42

Adolescents completed the fluid intelligence portion of the K-BIT, which assesses fluid reasoning with 48 items. This task uses abstract matrices similar to those developed by Raven,43 which are prototypical measures of fluid reasoning and general intelligence.44 The K-BIT Matrices test involves a series of progressively more challenging items. Test administration was discontinued when an adolescent responded incorrectly to all items in a set (sets include 5 items initially and 4 items for the last two sets). The K-BIT (and its revision, the KBIT-2) is widely used among children,41,4551 adolescents,5254 and adults;5557 the items on the K-BIT have well documented reliability across these samples, and results across samples correlate with re-assessments, suggesting that the interpretation of results across samples has strong validity. Hereafter, we refer to fluid intelligence on the K-BIT as IQ.

K-BIT norms were created specifically for the NCS-A by the test developer and co-author (Kaufman), as the NCS-A is considerably larger than the original normative sample for the K-BIT; in addition, the KBIT was published in 1990, so its norms were outdated. Raw scores were generated based on the K-BIT manual for 92.62% of tests, which were administered and scored exactly as prescribed. An additional 7.08% of tests could be scored despite deviations in test administration. For example, some respondents were only asked the most difficult item in each set. In these cases, the K-BIT score was imputed based on the number of correct items and the level at which they met discontinuation criteria. A small percentage of cases (0.3%) were excluded due to invalid test administration. Scores were normed within six-month age groups to mean (M) 100 and standard deviation (SD) 15. The K-BIT Matrices test demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha=0.90), comparable to the value of .88 reported in the K-BIT manual for ages 13–19.41 Exploratory factor analyses indicated that a one-factor model adequately fit the data.

Psychiatric diagnoses

An adolescent version of the Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI) for DSM-IV was used to assess psychiatric disorders.5860 Disorders were grouped into five empirically-defined clusters:61 1) fear disorders (specific phobia, agoraphobia, social phobia, panic disorder); 2) distress disorders (separation anxiety disorder, PTSD, major depressive episode/dysthymia, generalized anxiety disorder [GAD]); 3) behavior disorders (ADHD, ODD, conduct disorder, eating disorders); 4) substance disorders (alcohol and drug abuse, with or without dependence); and 5) bipolar disorder. ADHD is based on parent-report only. ODD and depression combined parent- and child-report of symptoms using an “or” rule.62,63 Children and parents who endorsed symptoms of each psychiatric disorder were asked about the age symptoms began. Clinical reappraisal of children comparing CIDI diagnoses to those assessed with a clinical interview showed good concordance.59

Disorder Severity

Respondents who met criteria for a diagnosis completed The Sheehan Disability Scales64 assessing the extent to which symptoms of the disorder interfered with home life, school or work, family relationships, and social life on a 0–10 Likert scale. Consistent with prior research,65,66 severe impairment was operationalized as a score of 7 or higher in any one of the four domains.

Covariates

Parental education (< high school, high school graduate, some college, college degree or more), parental income (<1.5, 1.5–3, 3.1–6, >6 times the poverty level), race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Asian, Other), age, nativity, number of siblings, and birth order were adjusted for in all models. The mean K-BIT score when all covariates were at their reference level was 102.2. In addition, lifetime disorders other than the focal disorder being examined were adjusted for using dichotomous indicators of any fear, any distress, any behavior, any substance, and bipolar disorder.

Statistical analysis

We examined mean levels of fluid intelligence among those meeting criteria for past-year and lifetime psychiatric disorders using linear regression. Effect sizes were estimated using Cohen’s d. We examined the distribution of low (<1 SD below the mean), average (within 1 SD of the mean), and high (>1 SD above the mean) fluid intelligence across disorder groups, and estimated associations with past-year and lifetime psychiatric disorders using generalized logit models. Sample sizes for each disorder group (past year, lifetime but not current, and by age-of-onset) as well as the no disorder group, are provided in Table 1; cells with insufficient sample size (<10) were not analyzed. In Supplementary Table 1, we provide cell sizes for those with a current disorder that began in the past year and for those with a current disorder that began prior to the past year. Finally, we examined whether sex and parent income moderated the associations of mental disorders with fluid intelligence and found no evidence of effect modification. All analyses were estimated with survey design weights; standard errors estimated with Taylor series linearization implemented in SAS© version 9.4 for Windows.67 A false discovery rate (FDR) correction for multiple comparisons was applied to all analyses given the large number of statistical tests.68

Table 1.

Sample sizes for each disorder group used in the analysis (N=10,073)

Past 12 month disorders, all ages Prior to past 12-month but not current disorder, all
ages
Age of onset
Total Low
(%)
Middle
(%)
High
(%)
Total Low (%) Middle (%) High (%) 4–8 9–
12
13–
17
I. Fear disorders
Specific phobia 1621 365 1058 198 357 58 253 46 1628 315 35
Agoraphobia 217 55 126 36 73 18 45 10 125 117 48
Social phobia 1273 256 848 169 147 35 89 23 556 640 224
Panic disorder 191 35 136 20 44 12 28 4 78 86 71
No lifetime fear disorder 7164 1249 4824 1091 7164 1249 4824 1091
II. Distress disorders
Separation anxiety disorder 162 42 107 13 44 142 387 72 484 187 92
Post-traumatic stress disorder 288 50 194 44 95 24 59 12 107 102 174
Major depressive episode/dysthymia 949 182 638 129 408 70 278 60 207 495 655
Generalized anxiety disorder 176 41 111 24 121 25 80 16 66 98 133
No lifetime distress disorder 4473 818 3036 619 4473 818 3036 619
III. Behavior disorders
ADHD 247 70 149 28 183 45 121 17 327 78 23
Oppositional defiant disorder 488 113 328 47 554 117 352 85 294 430 318
Conduct disorder 333 90 216 27 249 65 158 26 184 384 297
Eating disorders 311 76 195 40 241 51 159 31 42 194 316
No lifetime behavior disorder 8103 1401 5483 1219 8103 1401 5483 1219
IV. Substance disorders
Alcohol abuse 504 110 344 50 170 36 116 18 4 51 619
Drug abuse 548 107 376 65 328 64 234 30 4 81 791
No lifetime substance disorder 8912 1620 5951 1341 8912 1620 5951 1341
V. Other disorders
Bipolar disorder 113 32 69 12 22 6 15 1 20 47 68
No lifetime bipolar disorder 8831 1591 5905 1335 8831 1591 5905 1335

Results

Fluid intelligence and past-year psychiatric disorders

Table 2 shows adjusted means and standardized betas for the association between fluid intelligence and past-year psychiatric disorder, as well as lifetime (but not past-year) disorder (see Supplementary Table 2 for unadjusted means). Past-year bipolar disorder was associated with the lowest average fluid intelligence (M=94.2, p<.01) followed by behavior disorders, with ADHD, conduct disorder, and ODD each falling significantly below the population mean (M=96.3–97.3, p-values ranging from 0.02 to <0.01). Past-year substance disorders were also associated with low IQ (M=96.5–97.6, p-values ranging from 0.02 to <0.01). Of the fear and distress disorders, only past-year specific phobia (M=97.1, p=0.001) was associated with low fluid intelligence. Past-year major depression was associated with slightly higher fluid intelligence (M=100, p<0.01) compared to those with no distress disorders. Fluid intelligence decreased as the number of current disorders increased. Effects sizes for these associations are provided in Supplementary Table 3. In Supplementary Table 4, we separate current disorders into those that began in the past 12 months versus those that began earlier. There were no significant associations between IQ and psychopathology for disorders that began in the past 12 months (however sample sizes were small).

Table 2.

Variation in fluid intelligence* as a function of psychiatric disorders in a population representation sample of adolescents (N=10,073)

Past 12 month disorders, all ages Lifetime, but not 12 months disorders, all ages
Mean IQ SE Beta p value+ Mean IQ SE Beta p value+
I. Fear disorders
Specific phobia 97.1 0.39 −1.31 0.001 99.1 0.76 −0.11 0.89
Agoraphobia 98.8 0.98 −0.45 0.65 98.2 1.66 −1.12 0.50
Social phobia 98.6 0.43 −0.51 0.25 97.4 1.17 −1.67 0.15
Panic disorder 98.4 1.04 −0.90 0.39 97 2.1 −2.34 0.27
No fear disorder 99.1 0.22 -- -- 99.1 0.22 -- --
II. Distress disorders
Separation anxiety disorder 96.8 1.13 −1.89 0.10 97.2 0.61 −1.56 0.01
Post-traumatic stress disorder** 99.7 0.88 0.94 0.29 96.8 1.46 −1.92 0.19
Major depressive episode/dysthymia 100 0.5 1.32 0.01 99.7 0.72 1.07 0.14
Generalized anxiety disorder 97.6 1.11 −1.12 0.32 96.7 1.3 −2.05 0.12
No distress disorder 98.8 0.25 -- -- 98.8 0.25 -- --
III. Behavior disorders
ADHD 96.3 0.91 −2.91 0.002 97.2 1.05 −2.02 0.05
Oppositional defiant disorder 97.3 0.66 −1.81 0.007 98.6 0.62 −0.5 0.42
Conduct disorder 97.1 0.82 −1.94 0.02 97.6 0.91 −1.44 0.12
Eating disorders 97.9 0.82 −1.28 0.12 98.4 0.91 −0.81 0.374
No behavior disorder 99.1 0.21 -- -- 99.1 0.21 -- --
IV. Substance disorders
Alcohol abuse 96.5 0.67 −2.6 <.001 97.6 1.1 −1.49 0.18
Drug abuse 97.6 0.64 −1.44 0.02 97.9 0.81 −1.18 0.14
No substance disorder 99.1 0.21 -- -- 99.1 0.21 -- --
V. Other disorders
Bipolar disorder 94.2 1.69 −4.97 0.004 98.3 3.05 −0.9 0.77
No bipolar disorder 99.2 0.21 -- -- 99.2 0.21 -- --
VI. Total number of disorders
Exactly one disorder 98.2 0.42 −0.99 0.02 99.7 0.51 0.88 0.09
Exactly two disorders 98.2 0.54 −0.97 0.08 97.5 1.08 −1.25 0.24
Three or more disorders 97.8 0.43 −1.36 0.002 95.9 1.76 −2.93 0.10
No disorder 98.8 0.21 -- -- 98.8 0.21 -- --
*

Scores were first normed in the sample by six-month age groups for mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Predicted means were estimated from linear regression models controlling for parental education; race/ethnicity, age, nativity (US born versus not), number of siblings, birth order, and non-focal disorder groups.

**

Among those with a lifetime exposure to a potentially traumatic event (N=6160, 61.2% of the total sample).

+

P-values are for the comparison between each disorder category to a reference group of no disorder in that category. For example, mean IQ among those with specific phobia is compared to those with no fear disorder. All p-values are false discovery rate adjusted.

Fluid intelligence and lifetime psychiatric disorders

Adjusted means of fluid intelligence for those meeting criteria for a lifetime but not current disorder are in Table 2 (see Supplementary Table 5 for adjusted means for lifetime disorders, regardless of past-year status). Associations with fluid intelligence were uniformly attenuated compared to past-year disorders, with one exception: past separation anxiety disorder was associated with low IQ (M=97.2, p=0.01). No association was observed between fluid intelligence and number of lifetime disorders.

Distribution of fluid intelligence by psychiatric disorder

Table 3 describes the proportion of adolescents with high, medium, and low IQ by psychiatric disorder status. Adjusted multinomial odds ratios for these distributions are in Table 4. Multiple past-year disorders had a larger proportion of adolescents in the low IQ range than those without a disorder, including bipolar disorder, all behavior disorders, alcohol abuse, separation anxiety disorder, specific phobia, and agoraphobia. The pattern was largely similar for lifetime but not past-year disorders, but was significant only for separation anxiety disorder, conduct disorder, and drug abuse. In Supplementary Table 6, we provide distributions of high, middle, and low IQ separating current disorders into those beginning in the past year vs. earlier.

Table 3.

Proportion of adolescents with fluid intelligence in low, middle, and high range as a function of psychiatric disorders in a population representation sample of adolescents (unadjusted) (N=10,073)

Past 12 month disorders, all ages Prior to past 12-month but not current disorder, all ages
Range (N total) Low
(n=1852) (%)
Middle
(n=6757) (%)
High
(n=1464) (%)
p-
value+
Low
(n=1852) (%)
Middle
(n=6757) (%)
High
(n=1464) (%)
p-
value+
I. Fear disorders
Specific phobia 22.52 65.27 12.21 <.001 16.25 70.87 12.89 0.36
Agoraphobia 25.35 58.06 16.59 0.03 24.66 61.64 13.7 0.36
Social phobia 20.11 66.61 13.28 0.21 23.81 60.54 15.65 0.36
Panic disorder 18.32 71.2 10.48 0.26 27.27 63.64 9.09 0.36
Any fear disorder 21.05 66.19 12.77 <.001 20.73 66.45 12.82 0.005
No fear disorder 17.51 67.38 15.12 -- 17.43 67.34 15.23 --
II. Distress disorders
Separation anxiety disorder 25.93 66.05 -- 0.02 23.63 64.39 11.98 0.03
Post-traumatic stress disorder** 17.36 67.36 15.28 0.37 25.26 62.11 12.63 0.61
Major depressive
episode/dysthymia
19.18 67.23 13.59 0.61 17.16 68.14 14.71 0.84
Generalized anxiety disorder 23.3 63.07 -- 0.37 20.66 66.12 13.22 0.84
Any distress disorder 18.14 67.13 14.73 0.37 20.53 66.08 13.39 0.06
No distress disorder 20.52 66.63 12.85 -- 17.82 67.35 14.84 --
III. Behavior disorders
ADHD 28.34 60.32 11.34 0.001 24.59 66.12 9.29 0.05
Oppositional defiant disorder 23.16 67.21 9.63 0.001 21.12 63.54 15.34 0.20
Conduct disorder 27.03 64.86 8.11 <.001 26.1 63.45 10.44 0.01
Eating disorders 24.44 62.7 12.86 0.02 21.16 65.98 12.86 0.42
Any behavior disorder 24.64 64.55 10.8 <.001 22.89 64.67 12.44 0.01
No behavior disorder 17.6 67.4 15 -- 17.29 67.67 15.04 --
IV. Substance disorders
Alcohol abuse 21.83 68.25 9.92 0.01 21.18 68.24 10.59 0.23
Drug abuse 19.53 68.61 11.86 0.18 19.51 71.34 9.15 0.04
Any substance disorder 20.47 68.59 10.94 0.01 19.98 69.42 10.59 0.009
No substance disorder 18.19 66.94 14.87 -- 18.18 66.78 15.05 --
V. Other disorders
Bipolar disorder 28.32 61.02 10.62 0.02 27.27 68.18 4.55 0.29
No bipolar disorder 18.27 67.15 14.58 -- 18.25 67.15 14.6 --
VI. Total number of disorders
Exactly one disorder 19.14 68.32 12.54 0.64 16.89 67.57 14.59 0.76
Exactly two disorders 16.2 69.91 13.89 0.64 22.54 68.79 8.67 0.76
Three or more disorders 22.49 66.05 11.45 0.22 25.4 65.08 9.52 0.76
Any disorder 20.14 67.56 12.3 0.22 18.34 67.62 14.04 0.88
No disorder 18.19 67.03 14.78 -- 18.39 67.02 14.59 --
**

Among those with a lifetime exposure to a potentially traumatic event (N=6160, 61.2% of the total sample)

+

P-values are for chi-square comparisons between each disorder category to a reference group of no disorder in that category. For example, mean IQ among those with specific phobia is compared to those with no fear disorder. All p-values are false discovery rate adjusted.

Table 4.

Multinomial logistic regression models measuring the odds of high, medium, or low fluid intelligence by age of onset of each disorder (N=10,073)*

Past 12 month and Lifetime disorders, all ages Lifetime but not Past 12 month disorder, all ages
Low
OR
95% C.I. Middle
OR
95% C.I. High Low
OR
95% C.I. Middle
OR
95% C.I. High
I. Fear disorders
Specific phobia 1.20 (1.0 – 1.5) 1.06 (0.9 – 1.3) -- 1.08 (0.7 – 1.6) 1.21 (0.9 – 1.7) --
Agoraphobia 0.70 (0.4 – 1.1) 0.59 (0.4 – 0.9) -- 1.22 (0.5 – 2.7) 0.90 (0.4 – 1.8) --
Social phobia 1.02 (0.8 – 1.3) 1.02 (0.8 – 1.2) -- 1.17 (0.7 – 2.0) 0.79 (0.5 – 1.3) --
Panic disorder 1.11 (0.6 – 2.0) 1.25 (0.8 – 2.0) -- 2.14 (0.7 – 6.9) 1.45 (0.5 – 4.2) --
II. Distress disorders
Separation anxiety disorder 1.70 (0.9 – 3.3) 1.46 (0.8 – 2.7) -- 1.38 (1.0 – 1.9) 1.04 (0.8 – 1.4) --
Post-traumatic stress disorder** 0.73 (0.5 – 1.1) 0.81 (0.6 – 1.1) -- 1.21 (0.6 – 2.5) 0.93 (0.5 – 1.8) --
Major depressive episode/dysthymia 0.86 (0.7 – 1.1) 0.94 (0.8 – 1.2) -- 0.81 (0.6 – 1.2) 0.93 (0.7 – 1.2) --
Generalized anxiety disorder 1.40 (0.8 – 2.4) 0.92 (0.6 – 1.5) -- 1.35 (0.7 – 2.6) 1.05 (0.6 –1.8) --
III. Behavior disorders
ADHD 1.79 (1.1 – 2.9) 1.06 (0.7 – 1.6) -- 1.62 (0.9 – 2.9) 1.33 (0.8 –2.2) --
Oppositional defiant disorder 1.52 (1.1 – 2.2) 1.26 (0.9 – 1.7) -- 1.06 (0.8 – 1.4) 0.85 (0.7 – 1.1) --
Conduct disorder 1.69 (1.1 – 2.7) 1.23 (0.8 – 1.9) -- 1.38 (0.8 – 2.3) 1.05 (0.7 – 1.6) --
Eating disorders 1.10 (0.7 – 1.7) 0.90 (0.6 – 1.3) -- 1.11 (0.7 – 1.8) 0.99 (0.7 – 1.5) --
IV. Substance disorders
Alcohol abuse 1.98 (1.4 – 2.9) 1.69 (1.2 – 2.3) -- 1.59 (0.9 – 2.9) 1.47 (0.9 – 2.5) --
Drug abuse 1.39 (1.0 – 2.0) 1.36 (1.0 –1.8) -- 1.72 (1.1 – 2.7) 1.72 (1.2 – 2.6) --
V. Other disorders
Bipolar disorder 2.30 (0.9 – 5.9) 1.20 (0.5 – 3.0) -- 3.76 (0.4 – 34.6) 3.10 (0.4 – 25.0) --
VI. Total number of disorders
Exactly one disorder 1.11 (0.9 – 1.4) 1.12 (0.9 – 1.3) -- 0.87 (0.7 – 1.1) 0.94 (0.8 – 1.2) --
Exactly two disorders 1.08 (0.8 – 1.4) 1.10 (0.9 – 1.4) -- 1.90 (1.0 – 3.5) 1.63 (0.9 –2.8) --
Three or more disorders 1.42 (1.1 – 1.8) 1.19 (1.0 – 1.5) -- 2.20 (0.8 – 5.8) 1.51 (0.6 – 3.6) --
*

Models were adjusted for parental education; race/ethnicity, age, nativity (US born versus not), number of siblings, birth order, and non-focal disorder groups

**

Among those with a lifetime exposure to a potentially traumatic event (N=6160, 61.2% of the total sample)

Fluid intelligence by psychiatric disorder severity

Table 5 shows associations between disorder severity and fluid intelligence. Greater disorder severity was associated with lower IQ across a wide range of disorders including all fear disorders, GAD, ODD, eating disorders, alcohol abuse, and bipolar disorder.

Table 5.

Variation in fluid intelligence* as a function of severity of psychiatric disorders in a population representation sample of adolescents (N=10,073)

Disorder severity low, all
ages
Disorder severity high, all ages
Mean IQ SE Mean IQ Beta SE p value+
I. Fear disorders
Specific phobia 99.0 0.20 94.5 −4.44 0.72 <.001
Agoraphobia 98.9 0.20 95.2 −3.71 1.04 <.001
Social phobia 98.9 0.20 96.9 −2.05 0.62 0.001
Panic disorder 98.9 0.20 96.3 −2.58 1.03 0.01
II. Distress disorders
Separation anxiety disorder 98.8 0.20 96.4 −2.48 1.75 0.16
Post-traumatic stress disorder** 98.8 0.20 99.2 0.38 1.21 0.75
Major depressive episode/dysthymia 98.8 0.20 99.6 0.82 0.60 0.18
Generalized anxiety disorder 98.9 0.20 96.3 −2.55 0.92 0.006
III. Behavior disorders
ADHD 98.8 0.20 99.2 0.34 2.36 0.89
Oppositional defiant disorder 98.9 0.20 96.4 −2.50 0.98 0.01
Conduct disorder 98.6 0.32 97.9 −0.73 0.45 0.13
Eating disorders 98.8 0.20 91.1 −7.71 3.29 0.02
IV. Substance disorders
Alcohol abuse 98.9 0.20 93.3 −5.56 1.15 <.001
Drug abuse 98.8 0.20 97.2 −1.65 1.37 0.23
V. Other disorders
Bipolar disorder 98.9 0.20 96.5 −2.43 0.74 0.001
*

Scores were first normed in the sample by six-month age groups for mean of 100 and standard deviation of 15. Predicted means were estimated from linear regression models controlling for parental education; race/ethnicity, age, nativity (US born versus not), number of siblings, birth order, and non-focal disorder groups

**

Among those with a lifetime exposure to a potentially traumatic event (N=6160, 61.2% of the total sample)

+

P-values are for the comparison between each disorder category to a reference group of no disorder in that category. For example, mean IQ among those with specific phobia is compared to those with no fear disorder. All p-values are false discovery rate adjusted.

Fluid intelligence by psychiatric disorder age-of-onset

Supplementary Tables 7–9 provide unadjusted mean differences in IQ, IQ distributions, and adjusted associations as a function of disorder age-of-onset. Few differences emerged by disorder age-of-onset.

Discussion

The present study represents the first population-based study examining association of fluid intelligence with psychiatric disorders in U.S. youth. Our analysis generates three central conclusions.

First, past-year bipolar disorder, disruptive behavior disorders, and substance abuse were most strongly associated with low fluid intelligence. Lower IQ has been documented among youths with these disorders in clinical samples.1729,69,70 Our population estimates indicate that mean IQ was approximately 1/3 of a standard deviation (~5 points) lower than average among youths with bipolar disorder, behavior disorders, and substance abuse.

The associations of behavior disorders with IQ were stronger for current disorders than for disorders that had remitted. This could reflect either that behavior disorder symptomatology interferes with cognitive functioning, producing low IQ primarily for those with active symptoms, or that low IQ is observed among adolescents with behavior disorders that are chronic and involve more severe symptoms. Few adolescents had behavior disorder onsets in the past year, indicating that current disorders primarily reflect chronic cases, and low IQ was most consistently observed for adolescents with the most severe disorders. Prospective studies have documented low IQ as a precursor of behavior disorder onset.25,35 Our finding that adolescents with more chronic, severe forms of behavior disorder are most likely to have lower IQ is in line with these findings, although it does not rule out the possibility that IQ changes after onset of disorder explains at least a portion of the observed associations.

Second, most fear and distress disorders were not associated with low IQ, with the exception of specific phobia and separation anxiety disorder, which are among the earliest-onset fear and distress disorders.61 Specific phobia, in particular, has been shown to explain a meaningful proportion of later-onset mental disorders.71 These disorders thus appear to represent an early liability to internalizing psychopathology; our results suggest that this liability may be associated with low IQ. Past-year specific phobia was associated with IQ but lifetime disorder was not. Specific phobia is often a persistent condition,71,72 and this pattern could reflect an association of low IQ with persistent, but not transient, phobia. Alternatively, it may be that current symptoms of phobia interfered with performance due to test anxiety. In contrast, separation anxiety was related to IQ when experienced prior to the past year but not currently. Given the high prevalence of these disorders,71,73 greater research is needed on neuropsychological correlates of early-onset fear and distress disorders.

We found no association between PTSD and IQ. This diverges from prior research, which has consistently demonstrated that low IQ is a risk factor for PTSD onset after trauma.30,7476 However, most prior work has been conducted in military samples returning from active combat. Military samples are not representative of the general population, nor are they composed of adolescents in our age range. Further, considerable disagreement exists regarding the validity of the association between IQ and PTSD in military samples,77,78 as IQ may select service members into degree of combat exposure. Our results are not consistent with theories that low IQ is a vulnerability factor for the development of PTSD after trauma, at least among youth.

Third, past-year depression was associated with slightly higher mean IQ, though we should note that the effect size was small, but statistically significant due to the high prevalence of major depression in adolescence.79 It has frequently been argued that children with very high IQ may exhibit higher rates of bipolar disorder,8082 as well as social withdrawal and avoidance.83 We find no support for a link between high IQ and bipolar disorders at the population level, but the observed association with depression warrants further exploration, as children with higher IQ may present with unique mental health concerns.

IQ was ascertained at the time of the interview, precluding an assessment of the reciprocal relation between mental disorders and cognitive ability. Although some of the variance in IQ is stable over early development,84,85 there is also substantial plasticity in IQ.43,84,86,87 while we cannot establish temporality, the associations of IQ with past-year disorders were consistently stronger than for lifetime disorders that had remitted. Although this could reflect a stronger influence of current symptoms on IQ than the reverse, the most plausible interpretation of this pattern is that current symptoms reflect the most persistent disorders, suggesting that lower IQ is associated with chronic psychopathology rather than transient disorders. Future studies should examine this possibility, as measures of disorder duration were substantially co-linear with age-of-onset, given the young age of NCS-A participants.

Taken together, these findings indicate that children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders face challenges in learning, memory, and reasoning. This underscores the need for early identification of children with mental disorders to provide academic accommodations and treatment in order to promote long-term success. Although accommodations are often made for children with ADHD and behavior problems, our findings suggest that children with early-onset fear and distress disorders and adolescents with substance use disorders may also require individualized education plans and support. These findings also provide fruitful hypotheses for future research. For example, children with psychiatric disorders face lower educational and occupational functioning; these results suggest that fluid intelligence may be a mechanism in this pathway, given that higher IQ is associated with better school performance.87,88 This remains to be examined in future studies.

In addition to the limitation of a single time point of measurement of IQ, other limitations should be considered. The K-BIT was administered by lay interviewers, which may have increased the frequency of protocol deviations in test administration. Such deviations could have led to worse performance among children with test-taking difficulties (e.g., ADHD or test anxiety). However, the K-BIT has been validated in children with intellectual disability and other challenges,50,53,54 and the reliability of K-BIT Matrices was comparable for the present sample and the standardization sample. Further, the K-BIT is a “Level B” test, which permits examiners without high qualifications to administer and interpret it. Psychosis was not assessed in NCS-A given low prevalence in this age group, precluding evaluation of associations with IQ. Finally, given the cross-sectional assessment, recall bias in reports of past disorders likely contributed to under-reporting of past disorders, particularly those that were low in severity. This would make the IQ associations with lifetime disorders overestimates as they reflect more severe cases. Longitudinal data are needed to determine the extent to which early-onset psychiatric disorders that remit influence IQ.

Conclusions

The present study is the largest assessment of IQ in U.S. children ever conducted, and results demonstrate robust associations of IQ with a broad psychiatric disorders, most notably for bipolar disorders and behavior disorders—including ADHD, ODD, and conduct disorder, as well as specific phobia, separation anxiety, and substance disorders. Although associations of IQ with bipolar disorder and behavior disorders are consistent with prior research from clinical samples, those with fear and distress disorders reveal novel relationships not observed in prior studies and call into question others, including the lack of a relationship with PTSD. Together, these findings reflect the potential role of cognitive factors in the etiology of diverse forms of psychopathology, as well as how mental disorders may influence cognitive ability. Most importantly, this work highlights the critical importance of early identification and treatment of mental disorders in youth and the potential utility of accommodations in school settings for children with a wide range of psychiatric disorders in order to promote long-term success.

Supplementary Material

Table 1 - 9

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dahsan Gary for assistance with manuscript preparation, and Seth Prins for comments on a draft version of the manuscript.

Kaufman earns royalties from Pearson on other Kaufman tests, but the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) is no longer published or available for purchase.

Funding: The present study was funded by the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (K01AA021511, Keyes); the National Institute of Mental Health (R01-MH103291, R01-MH106482, McLaughlin), and a Jacobs Foundation Early Career Research Fellowship, McLaughlin; the National Institute of Mental Health (T32 MH013043, Platt).

Role of the funder: The funders had no role in the analysis or interpretation of these data, and did not provide final approval on submission.

Footnotes

Financial disclosure/conflict of interest: The authors report no conflicts of interest. Keyes, Platt, and McGlaughlin have no financial relationships with commercial interests.

Access to the data and data analysis: Katherine Keyes and Jonathan Platt had full access to all the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

References

  • 1.Willcutt EG, Doyle AE, Nigg JT, Faraone SV, Pennington BF. Validity of the executive function theory of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a meta-analytic review. Biol Psychiatry. 2005;57(11):1336–1346. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Martinussen R, Hayden J, Hogg-Johnson S, Tannock R. A meta-analysis of working memory impairments in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2005;44(4):377–384. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000153228.72591.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Yehuda R, Keefe RS, Harvey PD, et al. Learning and memory in combat veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152(1):137–139. doi: 10.1176/ajp.152.1.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Vasterling JJ, Duke LM, Brailey K, Constans JI, Allain AN, Jr, Sutker PB. Attention, learning, and memory performances and intellectual resources in Vietnam veterans: PTSD and no disorder comparisons. Neuropsychology. 2002;16(1):5–14. doi: 10.1037//0894-4105.16.1.5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bremner JD, Vermetten E, Afzal N, Vythilingam M. Deficits in verbal declarative memory function in women with childhood sexual abuse-related posttraumatic stress disorder. J Nerv Men. Dis. 2004;192(10):643–649. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000142027.52893.c8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vasterling JJ, Brailey K. Neuropsychological Findings in Adults with PTSD. In: Vasterling JJ, Brewin CR, editors. Neuropsychology of PTSD: Biological, cognitive, and clinical perspectives. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2005. [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Moradi AR, Doost HTN, Taghavi MR, Yule W, Dalgleish T. Everyday memory deficits in children and adolescents with PTSD: Performance on the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 1999;40:357–361. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Sternberg RJ. Handbook of Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Neisser U, Boodoo G, Bouchard TJ, et al. Intelligence: knowns and unknowns. American Psychologist. 1996;51(2):77–101. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lezak M. Neuropsychological assessment. 3rd. New York: Oxford University Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sternberg RJ. Beyond IQ: a triarchic theory of human intelligence. CUP Archive. 1985 [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Gardner HE. Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Int. Perseus Books Group. 2000 [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schneider WJ, McGrew KS. The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In: Flanagar DP, Harrison PL, editors. Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues. 3rd. New York: Guilford Press; 2012. pp. 99–144. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Catell RB. Intelligence: Its structure growth and action. Amsterdam: North-Holland: 1971. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Caroll JB. Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1993. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Benson NF, Kranzler JH, Floyd RC. Examining the integrity of measurement of cognitive abilities in the prediction of achievement: Comparisons and contrasts across variables from higher-order and bifactor models. Sch Psychol. 2016;58(1):1–19. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2016.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Rapport MD, Scanlan SW, Denney CB. Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and scholastic achievement: a model of dual developmental pathways. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1999;40(8):1169–1183. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mariani MA, Barkley RA. Neuropsychological and academic functioning in preschool boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Dev Neuropsychol. 1997;13:111–129. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Crosbie J, Schachar R. Deficient inhibition as a marker for familial ADHD. Am J Psychiatry. 2001;158(11):1884–1890. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.11.1884. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Rucklidge JJ, Tannock R. Psychiatric, psychosocial, and cognitive functioning of female adolescents with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001;40(5):530–540. doi: 10.1097/00004583-200105000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kuntsi J, Eley TC, Taylor A, et al. Co-occurrence of ADHD and low IQ has genetic origins. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2004;124B(1):41–47. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.20076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Cook ET, Greenberg MT, Kusche CA. The relations between emotional understanding, intellectual functioning, and disruptive behavior problems in elementary-school-aged children. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1994;22(2):205–219. doi: 10.1007/BF02167900. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Dietz KR, Lavigne JV, Arend R, Rosenbaum D. Relation between intelligence and psychopathology among preschoolers. J Clin Child Psychol. 1997;26(1):99–107. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2601_10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kusche CA, Cook ET, Greenberg MT. Neuropsychological and cognitive functioning in children with anxiety, externalizing, and comorbid psychopathology. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1993;22(2):172–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.White JL, Moffitt TE, Silva PA. A prospective replication of the protective effects of IQ in subjects at high risk for juvenile delinquency. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1989;57(6):719–724. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.57.6.719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fergusson DM, Horwood LJ, Lynskey MT. The effects of conduct disorder and attention deficit in middle childhood on offending and scholastic ability at age 13. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1993;34(6):899–916. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gendreau PCG, Little T. Predicting adult offender recidivism: What works. Ontario, Canada: Public Works and Government Services Canada; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vitacco MJ, Neumann CS, Jackson RL. Testing a four-factor model of psychopatholoyg and its association with ethnicity, gender, intelligence, and violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 2005;73(3):466–476. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.3.466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kandel E, Mednick SA, Kirkegaard-Sorensen L, et al. IQ as a protective factor for subjects at high risk for antisocial behavior. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988;56(2):224–226. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.56.2.224. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koenen KC, Moffitt TE, Poulton R, Martin J, Caspi A. Early childhood factors associated with the development of post-traumatic stress disorder: results from a longitudinal birth cohort. Psychol Med. 2007;37(2):181–192. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706009019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Grossman I, Kaufman AS, Mednitsky S, Scharff L, Dennis B. Neurocognitive abilities for a clinically depressed sample versus a matched control group of normal individuals. Psychiatr Res. 1994;51(3) doi: 10.1016/0165-1781(94)90011-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Werry JS, Elkind GS, Reeves JC. Attention deficit, conduct, oppositional, and anxiety disorders in children: III. Laboratory differences. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 1987;15:409–428. doi: 10.1007/BF00916458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Shaffer D, Schonfeld I, O'Connor PA, et al. Neurological soft signs. Their relationship to psychiatric disorder and intelligence in childhood and adolescence. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1985;42(4):342–351. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1985.01790270028003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Gorlyn M, Keilp JG, Oquendo MA, Burke AK, Sackeim HA, John Mann J. The WAIS-III and major depression: absence of VIQ/PIQ differences. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006;28(7):1145–1157. doi: 10.1080/13803390500246944. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Moffitt TE, Caspi A. Childhood predictors differentiate life-course persistent and adolescence-limited antisocial pathways among males and females. Dev Psychopathol. 2001;13(2):355–375. doi: 10.1017/s0954579401002097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Merikangas KR, Avenevoli S, Costello EJ, Koretz D, Kessler RC. National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A): I. Background and measures. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2009;48(4):367–369. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819996f1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kessler RC, Avenevoli S, Costello EJ, et al. National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A): II. Overview and design. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2009;48(4):380–385. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181999705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kessler RC, Avenevoli S, Costello EJ, et al. Design and field procedures in the US National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A) International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2009;18(2):69–83. doi: 10.1002/mpr.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kessler RC, Berglund P, Chiu WT, et al. The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R): design and field procedures. Int J Methods Psychiatr. Res. 2004;13(2):69–92. doi: 10.1002/mpr.167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kessler RC, Avenevoli S, Green J, et al. National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A): III. Concordance of DSM-IV/CIDI diagnoses with clinical reassessments. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2009;48(4):386–399. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819a1cbc. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kaufman AS, Kaufman NL. Manual for the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service; 1990. [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Kaufman AS, Wang JJ. Gender, race, and education differences on the K-BIT at Ages 4 to 90 Years. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 1992;10(3):219–229. [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Raven JC. Unpublished master's thesis, University of London. 1936. Mental tests used in genetic studies: The performance of related individuals on tests mainly educative and mainly reproductive. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Kaufman AS. IQ testing 101. New York: Springer; 2009. [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Prewett PN. A comparison of two screening tests (the Matrix Analogies Test—Short Form and the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test) with the WISC-III. Psychological Assessment. 1995;7(1) [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Canivez GL. Validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test: Comparisons with the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - Third Edition. Assessment. 1995;2(2):101–111. [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Childers JS, Durham TW. Relation of performance on the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test with the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-revised among preschool children. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1994;79(3):1195–1199. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.3.1195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Canivez GL, Neitzel R, Martin BE. Construct Validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test, Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Third Edition, and Adjustment Scales for Children and Adolescents. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 2005;23(1):15–34. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Prewett PN. The relationship between the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) and the WISC-R with referred students. Psychol Schs. 1992;29(1):25–27. [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Canivez GL. Validity and Diagnostic Efficiency of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test in Reevaluating Students with Learning Disability. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment. 1996;14(1):4–19. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Levinson EM, Folino L. Correlations of scores on the Gifted Evaluation Scale with those on WISC-III and Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test for students referred for gifted evaluation. Psycho Rep. 1994;74(2):419–424. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1994.74.2.419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Grados JJ, Russo-Garcia KA. Comparison of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test and the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children—third edition in economically disadvantaged African American youth. J Clin Psychol. 1999;55(9):1063–1071. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-4679(199909)55:9<1063::aid-jclp4>3.0.co;2-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mervis CB, Kistler DJ, John AE, Morris CA. Longitudinal Assessment of Intellectual Abilities of Children with Williams Syndrome: Multilevel Modeling of Performance on the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test-2. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. 2012;117(2):134–155. doi: 10.1352/1944-7558-117.2.134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Webber LS, McGillivray JA. An Australian Validation of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test (K-BIT) with Adolescents with An Intellectual Disability. Australian Psychologist. 1998;33(3):234–237. [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hays JR, Reas DL, Shaw JB. Concurrent validity of the Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence and the Kaufman brief intelligence test among psychiatric inpatients. Psycho Rep. 2002;90(2):355–359. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.2.355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Naugle RI, Chelune GJ, Tucker DG. Validity of the Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Psychol Assess. 1993;5(2):182–186. [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Walters SO, Weaver KA. Relationships between the Kaufman brief intelligence test and the Wechsler adult intelligence scale. Psychol Rep. 2003;92(3c):1111–1115. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.3c.1111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kessler RC, Avenevoli S, Costello EJ, et al. National comorbidity survey replication adolescent supplement (NCS-A): II. Overview and design. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48(4):380–385. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e3181999705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kessler RC, Avenevoli S, Green J, et al. National comorbidity survey replication adolescent supplement (NCS-A): III. Concordance of DSM-IV/CIDI diagnoses with clinical reassessments. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48(4):386–399. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819a1cbc. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Merikangas K, Avenevoli S, Costello J, Koretz D, Kessler RC. National comorbidity survey replication adolescent supplement (NCS-A): I. Background and measures. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009;48(4):367–369. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819996f1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kessler RC, Chiu WT, Demler O, Merikangas KR, Walters EE. Prevalence, severity, and comorbidity of 12-month DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2005;62(6):617–627. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.617. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Cantwell DP, Lewinsohn PM, Rohde P, Seeley JR. Correspondence between adolescent report and parent report of psychiatric diagnostic data. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997;36(5):610–619. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199705000-00011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Grills AE, Ollendick TH. Issues in parent-child agreement: the case of structured diagnostic interviews. Clin Child Fam Psychol. Rev. 2002;5(1):57–83. doi: 10.1023/a:1014573708569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Leon AC, Olfson M, Portera L, Farber L, Sheehan DV. Assessing psychiatric impairment in primary care with the Sheehan Disability Scale. Int J Psychiatry Med. 1997;27(2):93–105. doi: 10.2190/T8EM-C8YH-373N-1UWD. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.McLaughlin KA, Green JG, Hwang I, Sampson NA, Zaslavsky AM, Kessler RC. Intermittent explosive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(11):1131–1139. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2012.592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Kessler RC, Coccaro EF, Fava M, Jaeger S, Jin R, Walters E. The prevalence and correlates of DSM-IV intermittent explosive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2006;63(6):669–678. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.63.6.669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.SAS. Copyright © 2013 SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA: SAS and all other SAS Institute. Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute., Inc.; [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Noble WS. How does multiple testing correction work? Nat Biotechnol. 2009;27(12):1135–1137. doi: 10.1038/nbt1209-1135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Thaler NS, Sutton GP, Allen DN. Social cognition and functional capacity in bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Psychiatry Res. 2014;220(1–2):309–314. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Buchy L, Seidman LJ, Cadenhead KS, et al. Evaluating the relationship between cannabis use and IQ in youth and young adults at clinical high risk of psychosis. Psychiatry Res. 2015;230(3):878–884. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.11.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Kessler RC, Avenevoli S, Costello EJ, et al. Prevalence, persistence, and sociodemographic correlates of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2012;69(4):372–380. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Becker ES, Rinck M, Turke V, et al. Epidemiology of specific phobia subtypes: findings from the Dresden Mental Health Study. Eur Psychiatry. 2007;22(2):69–74. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2006.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Merikangas KR, Nakamura EF, Kessler RC. Epidemiology of mental disorders in children and adolescents. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2009;11(1):7–20. doi: 10.31887/DCNS.2009.11.1/krmerikangas. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Pitman RK, Orr SP, Lowenhagen MJ, Macklin ML, Altman B. Pre-Vietnam contents of posttraumatic stress disorder veterans' service medical and personnel records. Compr Psychiatry. 1991;32(5):416–422. doi: 10.1016/0010-440x(91)90018-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Macklin ML, Metzger LJ, Litz BT, et al. Lower precombat intelligence is a risk factor for posttraumatic stress disorder. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1998;66(2):323–326. doi: 10.1037//0022-006x.66.2.323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kremen WS, Koenen KC, Boake C, et al. Pretrauma cognitive ability and risk for posttraumatic stress disorder: a twin study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007;64(3):361–368. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.64.3.361. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Dohrenwend BP, Yager TJ, Wall MM, Adams BG. The Roles of Combat Exposure, Personal Vulnerability, and Involvement in Harm to Civilians or Prisoners in Vietnam War-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Clin Psychol Sci. 2013;1(3):223–238. doi: 10.1177/2167702612469355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Breslau N, Chen Q, Luo Z. The role of intelligence in posttraumatic stress disorder: does it vary by trauma severity? PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e65391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0065391. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M, et al. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders U.S. adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication--Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A) J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2010;49(10):980–989. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2010.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.MacCabe JH, Lambe MP, Cnattingius S, et al. Excellent school performance at age 16 and risk of adult bipolar disorder: national cohort study. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;196(2):109–115. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.060368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Kyaga S, Lichtenstein P, Boman M, Hultman C, Langstrom N, Landen M. Creativity and mental disorder: family study of 300,000 people with severe mental disorder. Br J Psychiatry. 2011;199(5):373–379. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.085316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Smith DJ, Anderson J, Zammit S, Meyer TD, Pell JP, Mackay D. Childhood IQ and risk of bipolar disorder in adulthood: prospective birth cohort study. Br J Psychiatry. 2015;1:74–80. doi: 10.1192/bjpo.bp.115.000455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Swiatek M. An Empirical Investigation of the Social Coping Strategies Used by Gifted Adolescents. Gifted Child Quarterly. 1995;39(3):154–160. [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Harkness AR, Silva PA. The natural history of change in intellectual performance: who changes? How much? Is it meaningful? J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1993;34(4):455–506. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1993.tb01031.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Price CJ, Ramsden S, Hope TM, Friston KJ, Seghier ML. Predicting IQ change from brain structure: a cross-validation study. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2013;5:172–184. doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2013.03.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Breslau N, Chilcoat HD, Susser ES, Matte T, Liang KY, Peterson EL. Stability and change in children's intelligence quotient scores: a comparison of two socioeconomically disparate communities. Am J Epidemiol. 2001;154(8):711–717. doi: 10.1093/aje/154.8.711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Deary J, Strand S, Smith P. Intelligence and educational achievement. Intelligence. 2007;35:13–21. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Kaufman AS, Raiford SE, Coalson DL. Intelligent testing with the WISC-V. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2016. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Table 1 - 9

RESOURCES