Abstract
In this paper, new error bounds for the linear complementarity problem are obtained when the involved matrix is a weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrix. The proposed error bounds are better than some existing results. The advantages of the results obtained are illustrated by numerical examples.
Keywords: error bound, linear complementarity problem, weakly chained diagonally dominant matrix, B-matrix
Introduction
A linear complementarity problem (LCP) is to find a vector such that
where and . The LCP has various applications in the free boundary problems for journal bearing, the contact problem, and the Nash equilibrium point of a bimatrix game [1–3].
The LCP has a unique solution for any if and only if M is a P-matrix [4]. In [5], Chen et al. gave the following error bound for the LCP when M is a P-matrix:
where is the solution of the LCP, , with , and the min operator denotes the componentwise minimum of two vectors. If M satisfies special structures, then some bounds of can be derived [6–11].
Definition 1
[4]
A matrix is called a B-matrix if for any ,
Definition 2
[12]
A matrix is called a weakly chained diagonally dominant (wcdd) matrix if A is diagonally dominant, i.e.,
and for each , there is a sequence of nonzero elements of A of the form with .
Definition 3
[13]
A matrix is called a weakly chained diagonally dominant (wcdd) B-matrix if it can be written in the form with a wcdd matrix whose diagonal entries are all positive.
García-Esnaola et al. [8] gave the upper bound for when M is a B-matrix: Let be a B-matrix with the form
where
| 1 |
and . Then
| 2 |
where and .
To improve the bound in (2), Li et al. [14] presented the following result: Let be a B-matrix with the form , where is defined as (1). Then
| 3 |
where , and
Recently, when M is a weakly chained diagonally dominant (wcdd) B-matrix, Li et al. [13] gave a bound for : Let be a wcdd B-matrix with the form , where is defined as (1). Then
| 4 |
where and if .
This bound in (4) holds when M is a B-matrix since a B-matrix is a weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrix [13].
Now, some notation is given, which will be used in the sequel. Let . For , denote
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: In Section 2, we present some new bounds for when M is a wcdd B-matrix. Numerical examples are given to verify the corresponding results in Section 3.
Main results
In this section, some new upper bounds for are provided when M is a wcdd B-matrix. Firstly, several lemmas, which will be used later, are given.
Lemma 1
[13]
Let be a wcdd B-matrix with the form , where is defined as (1). Then
where and .
Lemma 2
[15]
Let be a wcdd M-matrix with (). Then
where
Lemma 3
[14]
Let and . Then, for any ,
Theorem 1
Let be a wcdd B-matrix with the form , where is defined as (1). If, for each ,
then
| 5 |
where
Proof
Let . Then
where . Similar to the proof of Theorem 2 in [13], we see that is a wcdd M-matrix with positive diagonal elements and , and, by Lemma 1,
| 6 |
By Lemma 2, we have
By Lemma 3, we can easily get the following results: for each ,
and
| 7 |
Furthermore, by Lemma 3, we have
| 8 |
and
| 9 |
By (7), (8), and (9), we obtain
| 10 |
Therefore, the result in (5) holds from (6) and (10). □
Since a B-matrix is also a wcdd B-matrix, then by Theorem 1, we find the following result.
Corollary 1
Let be a B-matrix with the form , where is defined as (1). Then
| 11 |
where is defined as in Theorem 1.
We next give a comparison of the bounds in (4) and (5) as follows.
Theorem 2
Let be a wcdd B-matrix with the form , where is defined as (1). Let , , and be defined as in (3), (4), and (5), respectively. Then
| 12 |
Proof
Since is a wcdd matrix with positive diagonal elements, for any ,
| 13 |
By (13), for each ,
| 14 |
Remark 1
Numerical examples
In this section, we present numerical examples to illustrate the advantages of our derived results.
Example 1
Consider the family of B-matrices in [14]:
where . Then , where
By (2), we have
It is obvious that
By (3), we get
By Theorem 7 of [11], we have
By Corollary 1 of [13], we have
By (11), we obtain
In these two cases, the bounds in (2) are equal to 60 () and 90 (), respectively.
Example 2
Consider the wcdd B-matrix in [13]:
Then , where
By (4), we get
By (5), we have
Conclusions
In this paper, we present some new upper bounds for when M is a weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrix, which improve some existing results. A numerical example shows that the given bounds are efficient.
Acknowledgements
The author is grateful to the referees for their useful and constructive suggestions. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11361074, 11501141), the Foundation of Science and Technology Department of Guizhou Province ([2015]7206), the Natural Science Programs of Education Department of Guizhou Province ([2015]420), and the Research Foundation of Guizhou Minzu University (16yjsxm002, 16yjsxm040).
Footnotes
Competing interests
The author declares that he has no competing interests.
Author’s contributions
Only the author contributed to this work. The author read and approved the final manuscript.
References
- 1.Chen XJ, Xiang SH. Perturbation bounds of P-matrix linear complementarity problems. SIAM J. Optim. 2007;18:1250–1265. doi: 10.1137/060653019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cottle RW, Pang JS, Stone RE. The Linear Complementarity Problem. San Diego: Academic Press; 1992. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Murty KG. Linear Complementarity, Linear and Nonlinear Programming. Berlin: Heldermann Verlag; 1998. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Peña JM. A class of P-matrices with applications to the localization of the eigenvalues of a real matrix. SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. 2001;22:1027–1037. doi: 10.1137/S0895479800370342. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Chen XJ, Xiang SH. Computation of error bounds for P-matrix linear complementarity problem. Math. Program. 2006;106:513–525. doi: 10.1007/s10107-005-0645-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chen TT, Li W, Wu X, Vong S. Error bounds for linear complementarity problems of MB-matrices. Numer. Algorithms. 2015;70(2):341–356. doi: 10.1007/s11075-014-9950-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dai PF, Lu CJ, Li YT. New error bounds for the linear complementarity problem with an SB-matrix. Numer. Algorithms. 2013;64:741–757. doi: 10.1007/s11075-012-9691-6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.García-Esnaola M, Peña JM. Error bounds for linear complementarity problems for B-matrices. Appl. Math. Lett. 2009;22:1071–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2008.09.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 9.García-Esnaola M, Peña JM. Error bounds for linear complementarity problems involving -matrices. Appl. Math. Lett. 2012;25:1379–1383. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2011.12.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 10.García-Esnaola M, Peña JM. B-Nekrasov matrices and error bounds for linear complementarity problems. Numer. Algorithms. 2016;72(2):435–445. doi: 10.1007/s11075-015-0054-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Li CQ, Gan MT, Yang SR. A new error bound for linear complementarity problems for B-matrices. Electron. J. Linear Algebra. 2016;31:476–484. doi: 10.13001/1081-3810.3250. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shivakumar PN, Chew KH. A sufficient condition for nonvanishing of determinants. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 1974;43(1):63–66. doi: 10.1090/S0002-9939-1974-0332820-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li CQ, Li YT. Weakly chained diagonally dominant B-matrices and error bounds for linear complementarity problems. Numer. Algorithms. 2016;73(4):985–998. doi: 10.1007/s11075-016-0125-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li CQ, Li YT. Note on error bounds for linear complementarity problems for B-matrices. Appl. Math. Lett. 2016;57:108–113. doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2016.01.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Huang TZ, Zhu Y. Estimation of for weakly chained diagonally dominant M-matrices. Linear Algebra Appl. 2010;432:670–677. doi: 10.1016/j.laa.2009.09.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
