Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Feb 2;7:41797. doi: 10.1038/srep41797

Creation of Pd/Al2O3 Catalyst by a Spray Process for Fixed Bed Reactors and Its Effective Removal of Aqueous Bromate

Yu Gao 1,2,*, Wuzhu Sun 1,3,*, Weiyi Yang 1, Qi Li 1,a
PMCID: PMC5288787  PMID: 28150716

Abstract

Palladium nanoparticles were grown on sub-millimeter activated Al2O3 particle support by spraying H2PdCl4 solution evenly onto the support, followed with a thermal reduction under H2 atmosphere. Compared with its counterpart created by the conventional impregnation method, the Pd/Al2O3 catalyst created by the spray process could enrich the existence of active Pd nanoparticles on the surface of the catalyst support and increase their degree of dispersion, resulting in a much higher activity in the catalytic reduction of bromate in water. The effect of Al2O3 support particle size on the bromate removal rate was also investigated, which demonstrated that smaller support particle size could have higher activity in the catalytic reduction of bromate in water because of its larger exposed surface. This Pd/Al2O3 catalyst could be easily used in the fixed bed reactor due to its large support size and demonstrated excellent stability in the catalytic reduction of bromate in mineral water. This Pd/Al2O3 catalyst also exhibited a good catalytic reduction performance on azo dyes as demonstrated by its effective catalytic hydrogenation of methyl orange. Thus, catalysts prepared by the spray method developed in this work could have the potential to be used in fixed bed reactors for various water treatment practices.

Although bromate is not normally present in natural water, it could be readily formed as a toxic disinfection by-product during the drinking water disinfection with ozone when bromide ion is present in the raw water1,2. As a Group 2B substance defined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC)3,4, bromate had been recognized as having sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity in lab animals and potential carcinogenicity in human. Thus, World Health Organization (WHO) had suggested a regulatory maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 10 ppb for bromate in drinking water, and it had been adopted by many countries worldwide, including USA, European Union, Japan, and China5,6. An even more rigid MCL of 3 ppb had been established by European Union for ozonated natural mineral water and spring water7.

To meet the drinking water standard, various processes had been developed to treat bromate in drinking water, including the removal of bromate precursor, minimization of its formation during the ozone disinfection, and removal of it after its formation8,9. Among them, the removal of bromate after its formation is believed to be a more feasible approach9,10, and a variety of techniques have been suggested, including ultraviolet irradiation11,12, arc discharge13, adsorption14,15, membrane processes16, ion exchange8,17, coagulation16, chemical reduction18,19, electrochemical reduction20,21, photocatalytic reduction22,23, and biological methods24. However, most of these techniques encountered limitations such as low efficiency, secondary contamination, and concentrated waste streams. Thus, it is highly desirable to develop more effective approaches for the removal of bromate from drinking water.

As a fast, efficient and clean process, the catalytic hydrogenation has been considered as a promising approach to treat harmful reducible contaminants in water since the first report on the catalytic hydrogenation of nitrate in water by Vorlop and Tacke in 198925. Because it could be conducted under mild conditions without the production of contaminated disposals, this process has been extensively investigated for the removal of various contaminants from water, including nitrate26,27, nitrite28, perchlorate29,30, chlorinated organic contaminants31, chromium (VI)32, and azo dyes33. In 2010, Chen et al.34 reported the first catalytic reduction of bromate with noble metal catalysts loaded on various powder supports. Since then, efforts had been made to develop various catalysts for the catalytic reduction of aqueous bromate with encouraging results35,36,37,38,39. However, these catalysts could not be efficiently separated from treated water due to their powder form supports, and their dispersion into the aqueous environment may result in secondary pollution and a high cost due to their active components of expensive noble metals. To solve this problem, Pd catalysts on magnetically separable powder supports were developed40,41, which could provide a more efficient removal for these catalysts after their catalytic reduction of aqueous bromate. But they still could not be adopted in the most commonly used fixed-bed reactors in the water treatment industry42.

Recently, Pd was loaded onto carbon nanofibers grown on various macroscopic supports (such as sintered metal fibers or monoliths)43,44,45,46, which could be utilized in the fixed-bed reactors for the catalytic bromate reduction. However, their synthesis processes were generally complex and involved the use of expensive instruments, which largely increased their cost. Furthermore, their loading of palladium relied on the conventional impregnation method, which could load active palladium component into mesopores in the deep inside of these porous supports. Thus, the contact efficiency of reactants with active components decreased and the mass transfer limitation increased in the reaction, adverse to the improvement of the catalytic bromate reduction efficiency. Therefore, new methods should be developed to simplify the synthesis process, lower the production cost, and enrich the presence of active components on the catalyst surface for creating high efficient catalysts to be utilized in fixed-bed reactors for their potential water treatment practice.

In this work, a Pd/Al2O3 catalyst was developed by spraying H2PdCl4 solution evenly onto the sub-millimeter activated Al2O3 particle support, followed with a thermal reduction at 300 °C under H2 atmosphere. Compared with its counterpart created by the conventional impregnation method, it demonstrated much higher activity in the catalytic reduction of bromate in water because more active Pd components were enriched on its surface and their degree of dispersion increased, effectively enhancing the contact efficiency of reactants with Pd and minimizing the mass transfer limitation in the reaction. Both batch and continuous flow experiments were conducted for the catalytic bromate reduction. The study of the Al2O3 support particle size effect on the bromate removal demonstrated that smaller support particle size could have higher activity in the catalytic bromate reduction. The Pd/Al2O3 catalyst demonstrated a superior bromate removal capability during a continuous flow catalytic bromate reduction experiment in a lab-prepared, packed fixed-bed tube reactor, in which it completely removed bromate from natural mineral water of over 24000 bed volumes (BVs) during a continuous operation for 10 days. The Pd/Al2O3 catalyst also exhibited a good catalytic reduction performance on azo dyes as demonstrated by its effective catalytic hydrogenation of methyl orange.

Results and Discussion

Structure and morphology of Pd/Al2O3 catalysts

Figure 1a shows XRD patterns of activated Al2O3 and Pd/Al2O3 catalysts with a series of grounded activated Al2O3 particle sizes. For activated Al2O3, diffraction peaks belonging to α-Al2O3 (JCPDS No. 81-1667), η-Al2O3 (JCPDS No. 77-0396), and AlO(OH) (JCPDS No. 74-1895) could be clearly identified. For Pd/Al2O3 catalysts, the diffraction peaks of AlO(OH) could not be observed because activated Al2O3 was dehydrated in the calcination step during the Pd/Al2O3 catalyst synthesis process. No diffraction peaks of Pd could be identified in XRD patterns of these Pd/Al2O3 catalysts, which could be attributed to the low Pd-loading amount in them. ICP measurements demonstrated that the Pd-loading amount in Pd/Al2O3 catalysts prepared by the spray method was ~0.79 wt%, 0.81 wt%, and 0.88 wt% for SP20, SP40, and SP 60 samples, respectively, and the Pd-loading amount in IM40 sample prepared by the conventional impregnation method was ~0.94 wt%, which were too low to be detected by XRD34.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

(a) XRD patterns of activated Al2O3 and Pd/Al2O3 catalysts with a series of grounded activated Al2O3 particle sizes. (b) to (d) The representative XPS survey spectrum (b), SEM image (c), and TEM image of SP60 sample. (Note: The insert image in Fig. 1c shows the SEM image with a higher magnification, and the insert image in Fig. 1d shows the corresponding HRTEM image of the Pd nanoparticle with red circle.).

To examine the existence status of palladium on these Pd/Al2O3 samples, XPS analysis was conducted. Figure 1b shows the representative XPS survey spectrum of SP60 sample, which clearly demonstrated the existence of Al, O, and Pd. Due to the widespread presence of carbon in the environment, C 1 s peak could also be observed clearly in this XPS survey spectrum. The insert image in Fig. 1b shows the high-resolution XPS scan over Pd 3d peaks of SP60 sample. The binding energy of Pd 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 peaks was determined at ~341.3 eV and ~336 eV, respectively. Similar results were observed on other Pd/Al2O3 samples, which demonstrated clearly that metallic Pd32,40 was successfully loaded as the active component on sub-millimeter activated Al2O3 particle support by the spray method we developed after the thermal reduction at 300 °C under H2 atmosphere.

Figure 1c shows the SEM image of SP60 sample, which demonstrated the irregular shape, sub-millimeter size, rough surface, and porous structure of the catalyst support. The insert image in Fig. 1c shows its SEM image with a higher magnification, which clearly demonstrated that inter-connected macropores existed throughout the support, beneficial for liquid transport. Figure 1d shows the TEM image of SP60 sample, which demonstrated that dark Pd nanoparticles with the average particles size of several nm were distributed relatively evenly on the Al2O3 support. The insert image in Fig. 1d shows the corresponding high resolution TEM (HRTEM) image of the Pd nanoparticle with the red circle. One set of lattice planes could be clearly observed with the d-spacing at ~0.225 nm, corresponding to the (111) plane of metallic Pd (JCPDS No. 88-2335). This observation was consistent with the XPS analysis result. TEM and HRTEM images of SP20, SP40 and IM40 samples were demonstrated in Fig. S1 in the supplementary information, which showed similar results as that of SP60 sample.

Surface Properties of Pd/Al2O3 catalysts

To examine the specific surface area and pore structure of these Pd/Al2O3 samples, N2 adsorption/desorption isotherm measurements were conducted, which demonstrated that they were very similar. Figure 2a shows the representative N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of SP60 sample. The shape of the BET curve is the characteristics of mesoporous structure47. The BET surface specific area of SP60 sample was found to be ~259.1 m2 · g−1. The insert image in Fig. 2a shows the pore size distribution of SP60 sample calculated from the desorption data with BJH model, which suggested that most pores in it were mesopores and the average pore diameter was determined to be ~6.497 nm. The specific pore volume of SP60 sample was measured to be ~0.4208 cm3 · g−1. The BET specific surface area, average pore diameter, and specific pore volume of these Pd/Al2O3 samples were summarized in Table 1, compared with that of their activated Al2O3 supports. The loading of Pd nanoparticles onto sub-millimeter activated Al2O3 particles caused a moderate decrease of their specific surface areas, while it had not much effect on the pore structures of their supports, especially for samples prepared by the spray method developed in this work because the Pd-loading was more concentrated on the exposed macroscopic surface of supports by the spray method.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

(a) The representative N2 adsorption/desorption isotherms of SP60 sample. (Note: Insert image in Fig. 2a shows the pore size distribution of SP60 sample calculated from the desorption data with BJH model.) (b) High resolution XPS scans over Pd 3d peaks of SP40 and IM40 samples, respectively.

Table 1. BET specific surface area, average pore size, and specific pore volume of Al2O3 supports and Pd/Al2O3 catalyst samples.

  Al2O3 Support (mesh)
 Pd/Al2O3 Catalyst
20–40 40–60 60–100 SP20 SP40 SP60 IM40
BET Specific Surface Area (m2·g−1) 288.5 290.7 293.4 252.0 248.5 259.1 266.2
Average Pore Diameter (nm) 5.478 5.432 5.508 6.559 6.671 6.497 6.355
Specific Pore Volume (cm3·g−1) 0.3950 0.3949 0.4040 0.4132 0.4145 0.4208 0.4229
Open in a new tab

To examine the effect of different Pd-loading methods on the Pd existence on the surface these Pd/Al2O3 catalysts, high resolution XPS scans over Pd 3d peaks were conducted on SP40 and IM40 samples as shown in Fig. 2b. For both samples, the binding energy of Pd 3d3/2 and 3d5/2 peaks was determined at ~341.3 eV and ~336 eV, respectively, which demonstrated clearly metallic Pd32,40 was successfully loaded by both methods after the thermal reduction at 300 °C under H2 atmosphere. However, the Pd XPS signal intensities of these two samples were quite different. It was clear that SP40 sample had a much stronger Pd XPS signal intensity than IM40 sample, although ICP measurement results demonstrated that more Pd (~0.94 wt%) was loaded on IM40 sample by the conventional impregnation method than that on SP40 sample (~0.81 wt%) by the spray method developed in this work. The surface Pd/Al atomic ratio of SP40 sample determined by XPS was ~1:240, which was much higher than that of IM40 sample of ~1:474. Thus, Pd could be enriched on the surface of these sub-millimeter activated Al2O3 particle supports by the spray methods we developed than the conventional impregnation method, which should be beneficial for their catalytic reduction efficiency by reducing the mass transport limitation and subsequently facilitating the catalytic reduction process.

The CO chemisorption analysis results showed that the degree of dispersions of Pd nanoparticles in SP20, SP40, SP60 and IM40 samples was ~13.3%, 20.9%, 21.7% and 14.0%, respectively, and the corresponding average particle sizes of Pd nanoparticles in these Pd/Al2O3 catalysts was ~8.44, 5.36, 5.16 and 8.01 nm, respectively. The comparison between SP40 and IM40 samples clearly demonstrated that the spray method could load Pd nanoparticles with larger degree of dispersion and smaller particle size than the impregnation method, which should be beneficial for the catalytic reduction efficiency due to the enhancement of the contact efficiency of reactants with Pd. In addition, the degree of dispersion of Pd nanoparticles on Pd/Al2O3 catalysts prepared with the spraying method increased with the particle size decrease of Al2O3 catalyst support.

Catalytic bromate reduction in the batch reactor

Figure 3a compares the catalytic bromate reduction by SP40 and IM40 samples in the batch reactor. The sum of bromate and bromide concentrations during the reaction process was ~0.4 mM for both catalysts, which was equal to the initial bromate concentration in the solution. This observation indicated that bromide was the only catalytic reduction product by both catalysts in the present study34. After just 45 min reaction, the bromate concentration dropped from ~0.4 mM (51 ppm) to zero (below the detection limit of ~1 ppb) by the treatment of SP40 sample, representing a 100% conversion ratio, and its initial bromate reduction rate was determined at 36.7 mmolBromate · h−1 · gcat−1. For IM40 sample, however, the complete bromate reduction required 120 min treatment, and its initial bromate reduction rate was determined at 25.7 mmolBromate · h−1 · gcat−1. This comparison clearly demonstrated the importance of the Pd-loading method for the catalytic reduction performance of these Pd/Al2O3 catalysts. SP40 and IM40 samples were created by loading Pd nanoparticles onto the same Al2O3 catalysts support with the spray method and the conventional impregnation method, respectively, and the Pd-loading amount in IM40 sample (0.94 wt%) was even higher than that of SP40 sample (0.81 wt%). However, the catalytic bromate reduction performance of IM40 sample was obvious worse than that of SP40 sample under the same experimental conditions, which could be attributed to the surface enrichment of active Pd component and the degree of dispersion increase of Pd nanoparticles in SP40 sample. When the conventional impregnation method was used to load Pd on porous Al2O3 support, the Pd precursor solution could enter and then fill up the mesopores in the deep inside of the porous support. Thus, many Pd particles were created in these mesopores during the following drying, calcination, and reduction process, which could not be utilized efficiently during the catalytic bromate reduction. The spray method, by contrast, could place more Pd precursor solution more evenly on the surface or macropores of the Al2O3 support, which prevented the diffusion of Pd precursor solution into the mesopores in the deep inside. Thus, it could enrich the Pd existence on the accessible catalyst surface and increase its degree of dispersion, which resulted in the observed catalytic reduction performance enhancement.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

(a) The catalytic bromate reduction by SP40 and IM40 samples in the batch reactor, respectively. (b) The catalytic bromate reduction by SP20, SP40, and SP60 samples in the batch reactor, respectively.

Figure 3b compares the catalytic bromate reduction by SP20, SP40, and SP60 samples in the batch reactor. All three samples were prepared by the spray method, while their catalyst support had different sizes of 20~40, 40~60, and 60~100 meshes, respectively. All three samples could completely reduce bromate to bromide efficiently, while SP60 sample had the best performance. The specific surface area of these catalysts was mainly determined by the mesoporous structure of their Al2O3 supports, which did not change much during the grinding process to obtain supports with different particle sizes. Although these three samples had similar specific surface area values, smaller one could have a larger exposed surface to contact and immobilize Pd precursor during the spray and subsequent drying process, leading to more Pd enrichment on the support surface (the surface Pd/Al atomic ratio of SP60 sample at ~1:198) and its larger degree of dispersion (SP60 sample at ~21.7%) after the thermal reduction process. Thus, SP60 sample demonstrated the best performance among them. Table 2 compares the catalytic bromate reduction activity between SP60 sample and various Pd-based catalysts reported in literature34,35,36,40,41,42,43,44,45,46, and their initial bromate reduction rate was calculated based on the amount of active Pd component. It demonstrated clearly that our SP60 sample had a superior bromate reduction performance among these Pd-based catalysts.

Table 2. The comparison of catalytic bromate reduction activity between SP60 sample and various Pd-based catalysts reported in literature.

Catalysts Reaction Conditions Initial Reaction Rate (mmolBromate·h−1·gPd−1) Reference
0.88%Pd/Al2O3 0.4 mM Bromate, 0.05 g · L−1 Cat., 1 mL/mLaq. min H2, pH 6, RT 6001 This work
1.93%Pd/Al2O3 0.4 mM Bromate, 0.05 g · L−1 Cat., 0.2 mL/mLaq. min H2, pH 5.6, RT 554 [34]
2.2%Pd/MCN 0.78 mM Bromate, 0.03 g · L−1 Cat., 0.2 mL/mLaq. min H2, pH 5.6, RT 1818 [35]
1.5%Pd/ZSM5 0.078 mM Bromate, 0.5 g · L−1 Cat., 0.17 mL/mLaq. min H2, RT 25 [36]
0.104%Pd/Fe3O4 0.39 mM Bromate, 0.2 g · L−1 Cat., 0.5 mL/mLaq. min H2, pH 6, RT 5650 [40]
2.0%Pd/amino functionalized magnetic MCM-41 0.78 mM Bromate, 0.05 g · L−1 Cat., 0.2 mL/mLaq. min H2, pH 5.6, RT 1150 [41]
0.3%Pd/10%CNF/monolith 0.39 mM Bromate, 0.5 g · L−1 Cat., 0.42 mL/mLaq. min H2, RT 764 [44]
0.3%Pd/CNFs/Sintered Metal Fibers 0.39 mM Bromate, 1.67 g · L−1 Cat., 0.42 mL/mLaq. min H2, RT 470 [45]
0.3%Pd/CNFs/Carbon Cloth 0.39 mM Bromate, 0.83 g · L−1 Cat., 0.42 mL/mLaq. min H2, RT 861 [46]
Open in a new tab

As applied in previous studies of the reduction of bromate34,40, the pseudo-first-order kinetic model was used to fit the catalytic bromate reduction data in this work. The pseudo-first-order kinetic model could be defined by Eq. (1) and its integrated form was given in Eq. (2):

graphic file with name srep41797-m1.jpg
graphic file with name srep41797-m2.jpg

where Ct is the bromate concentration at treatment time t, C0 is the initial bromate concentration, and Kobs is the observed pseudo-first-order rate constant. Table 3 summaries the kinetics parameters obtained in fitting the experimental data. The applicability of the pseudo-first-order rate model was quantified by the square of the correlation coefficient R (R2). R2 for SP20, SP40, SP60, and IM40 samples were determined at 0.999, 0.994, 0.980, and 0.999, respectively. The closeness of R2 to 1 indicated that the pseudo-first-order kinetic model fitted the experimental data of the catalytic bromate reduction by these Pd/Al2O3 catalysts accurately. The Kobs for SP20, SP40, SP60, and IM40 samples were determined at 0.0717 min−1, 0.0822 min−1, 0.1255 min−1, 0.0394 min−1 respectively, and SP60 sample had the largest Kobs among these Pd/Al2O3 catalysts.

Table 3. The kinetics parameters obtained in fitting the experimental data in Fig. 3.

  SP20 SP40 SP60 IM40
Kobs (min−1) 0.0717 0.0822 0.1255 0.0394
R2 0.999 0.994 0.980 0.999
Open in a new tab

Catalytic bromate reduction in the fixed-bed reactor with lab-prepared water sample

To examine their potential for industrial applications, the continuous flow catalytic bromate reduction experiments were conducted in a lab-prepared, packed fixed-bed tube reactor. In order to avoid issues related to the back mixing of the solution, the diameter and height of the fixed-bed were designed to be more than 10 times and 100 times to the diameter of the catalyst support particle, respectively42. Figure 4 shows the experiment data of bromate and bromide concentrations in the effluent at different treatment times for fixed-beds of SP20, SP40, SP60, and IM40 samples, respectively. The test solution was prepared by RO water with 0.078 mM bromate, and Table 4 summarizes its water quality data. Besides the additionally added bromate, Cl−, NO3−, and SO42− ions were also found in it with the similar level of concentrations as bromate. The loading rate was ~2.83 L · m−2 · s−1 (10.19 m · h−1), and the empty bed contact times (EBCT) was only ~35 sec. It could be found that after an initial period within the first 10 h, the bromate and bromide concentrations in the effluent reached their equilibrium state and kept mostly constant till the end of the experiments.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Bromate and bromide concentrations in the effluent at different treatment times for fixed-beds of SP20 (a), SP40 (b), SP60 (c), and IM40 (d) samples, respectively.

Table 4. Water quality of test solutions used in the continuous flow catalytic bromate reduction experiments conducted in a lab-prepared, packed fixed-bed tube reactor.

  BrO3− pH Na+ Ca2+ Mg2+ K+ HCO3− Cl− NO3− SO42− SiO32−
RO Water 0.078 mM ~6.7 / / / / / 0.064 mM 0.084 mM 0.022 mM /
Natural Mineral Water 0.40 μM ~7.7 3.479 mM 0.970 mM 0.445 mM 0.009 mM 2.797 mM 1.850 mM 0.084 mM 0.445 mM 0.341 mM
Open in a new tab

In the initial period, adsorption, ion exchange and catalytic reduction all happened, which resulted in an interesting bromate and bromide concentration change observed in the effluent with the increase of experiment time. In the first ~2 h, bromate and bromide produced by the catalytic reduction were completely adsorbed onto the surface of these catalyst fixed-beds, so they could not be detected in the effluent. Next, from ~2 h to ~6 h, the adsorption of bromate and bromide approached to the saturation status, and more and more bromate and bromide remained in water and their concentrations gradually increased. Co-existed ions in the solution, such as sulfate, nitrate and chloride could exchange with adsorbed bromate and bromide due to their stronger affinity to these catalyst fixed-beds, and the concentrations of bromate and bromide in the effluent could continuously increase so that their sum could be even higher than the bromate concentration in the test solution. Then, from ~6 h to ~10 h, the concentrations of bromate and bromide in the effluent decreased because the ion exchange decreased as fewer and fewer bromate and bromide were still adsorbed on the surface of these catalyst fixed-beds. Finally, as the adsorption and desorption by the ion-exchange of bromate and bromide reached equilibrium, the change of their concentrations in the effluent stopped to reach the equilibrium state till the end of the experiments.

For all these Pd/Al2O3 catalysts, the sum of the equilibrium concentrations of bromate and bromide in the effluent was ~0.078 mM, equal to the bromate concentration of the test solution. This observation suggested that bromate was successfully reduced to non-toxic bromide during the flow of test solution through the fixed-bed reactor by its contact with these Pd/Al2O3 catalysts and H2, and these Pd/Al2O3 catalysts had a good stability in the packed bed mode and could be effective for a long time. The equilibrium bromate concentration in the effluent through the fixed-bed of SP40 was ~0.017 mM, while that of IM40 was ~0.044 mM. Thus, bromate reduced by the fixed-bed of SP40 was almost twice as that by the fixed-bed of IM40. The comparison between SP40 and IM40 samples clearly demonstrated that SP40 also had a much better performance than IM40 in the packed bed mode, which could be attributed to the effect of their different Pd-loading methods. With such a fast EBCT of ~35 sec, it was difficult for bromate in the test solution to diffuse into mesopores of IM40 sample in its deep inside of the porous Al2O3 support to react with Pd there, while it was much easier for bromate in the test solution to react with enriched Pd on the surface of SP40 sample. For the series of samples prepared by the spray method, the equilibrium bromate concentration in the effluent through the fixed-bed of SP20, SP40, and SP60 was ~0.045 mM, ~0.017 mM, and zero, respectively. Thus, catalysts with smaller support particle size had the better catalytic bromate reduction performance, which was the same as their batch experiment results. Besides the reason that smaller support particles could have larger exposed surface for Pd-loading, smaller support particles could have better intraparticle mass transfer, which also contributed to their better catalytic reduction performance. Among them, SP60 sample demonstrated a superior bromate reduction capability. No bromate was detected in the effluent through the whole period of the continuous flow catalytic bromate reduction experiment by the fixed-bed of SP60.

Catalytic bromate reduction in the fixed-bed reactor of SP60 with natural mineral water sample

In the industry, natural mineral water generally goes through the ozonation disinfection process before it is bottled or barrelled during its production. It usually contains bromate exceeding the drinking water limitation if bromide is present in the raw water. Both the complexity of substances in natural mineral water and the effect of residual ozone must be considered when dealing with the application of a catalyst to treat bromate contamination in natural mineral water production. Thus, the bromate removal performance of SP60 sample in the fixed-bed reactor was tested with natural mineral water sample for a continuous operation of 10 days. Bromate was added into the natural mineral water sample with the concentration of 0.40 μM (51 ppb), which was in the high end of bromate concentration found in drinking water after the ozonation disinfection process9. The water quality data of the natural mineral water sample could be found in Table 4, which clearly demonstrated the existence of various cations and anions with much higher concentrations (~22 to 8700 times) than that of the additionally added bromate. For the introduction of residual ozone into the natural mineral water sample, it was bubbled with an ozone flow of 3.5 L · min−1 for 2 h in every 50 kg water before being used. The loading rate was ~2.83 L · m−2 · s−1 (10.19 m · h−1), and the empty bed contact times (EBCT) was only ~35 sec. Figure 5 shows the bromate and bromide concentrations in the effluent at different treatment times up to 10 days for the fixed-bed of SP60 sample, which clearly demonstrated that bromate was completely removed during the whole treatment time from the natural mineral water sample, although it contained various competition ions at high concentration and residual ozone. Thus, our SP60 sample demonstrated a good potential for the catalytic reduction of bromate in the drinking water production industry.

Figure 5. Bromate and bromide concentrations in the effluent of natural mineral water sample at different treatment times up to 10 days for the fixed-bed of SP60 sample.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Catalytic methyl orange reduction by SP60 sample

These Pd/Al2O3 catalysts could also be utilized to treat other harmful reducible contaminants in water. For example, water pollution by dyes from the textile industries has become a serious problem in many countries48,49. The removal of dyes from wastewater is a challenge to relevant industries because commonly used synthetic dyes, for example azo dyes, are stable compounds and difficult to be treated in the water treatment practice48. The reduction of azo dyes could reduce the chromaticity color of wastewater, which subsequently could increase the self-cleaning capability of water and reduce the difficulty of the azo dye degradation. In this study, methyl orange (MO) was used as the model organic pollutant to examine the catalytic reduction capability of SP60 sample on azo dyes. Figure 6a shows the representative light absorption spectra of MO solutions at different treatment times by SP60 sample (0.05 g · L−1) under an H2 flow (200 mL · min−1), and the initial MO concentration was 50 ppm. With the increase of the treatment time, the light absorption of MO solution (at ~465 nm) decreased steadily, indicating the continuous decrease of MO concentration in the solution. After just 30 min, the light absorption of MO solution dropped to near zero, indicating a near complete reduction of MO. Thus, SP60 sample demonstrated a good catalytic reduction capability on MO. The MO catalytic reduction performance of SP60 sample in the fixed-bed reactor was also tested for a continuous operation of 3 days. The loading rate of MO solution was ~2.83 L · m−2·s−1 (10.19 m · h−1), and the empty bed contact time (EBCT) was also only ~35 sec. No color was observed in the effluent during the whole experiment time even with such a short EBCT. Figure 6b shows the MO concentration in the effluent at different treatment times up to 3 days for the fixed-bed of SP60 sample, which clearly demonstrated that MO was completely reduced during the whole treatment time.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

(a) The representative light absorption spectra of MO solutions at different treatment times by SP60 sample. (b) MO concentration in the effluent at different treatment times up to 3 days for the fixed-bed of SP60 sample.

In summary, a spray method was developed for Pd-loading onto sub-millimeter activated Al2O3 porous particle support, which resulted in the surface enrichment of active Pd nanoparticles and their larger degree of dispersion compared with the conventional impregnation method. By this means, the contact efficiency of reactants with catalysts could be enhanced, and the mass transfer limitation in the reaction could be minimized. Thus, Pd/Al2O3 catalyst prepared by the spray method demonstrated much higher activity in the catalytic reduction of bromate in water than its counterpart created by the conventional impregnation method with even higher Pd-loading amount. These Pd/Al2O3 catalysts could be easily adopted in the fixed bed reactor due to its large support size, which was beneficial for their potential usage in the water treatment practice. By modulating the size of Al2O3 particle support, Pd/Al2O3 catalyst with a superior bromate reduction capability was developed, which completely removed bromate from natural mineral water sample in the fixed-bed reactor for a continuous run of 10 days. It could also be used for the catalytic reduction of other harmful reducible contaminants in water as demonstrated by its effective catalytic reduction of methyl orange. Thus, the spray method developed in this work may be readily adopted to prepare catalysts with enriched existence of active components on their surface, and these catalysts developed could have the potential to be used in fixed bed reactors for various water treatment practices.

Methods

Chemicals and materials

All chemicals were of reagent grade and used without further purification. Palladium dichloride, hydrochloric acid, sodium bromate, sodium bromide, and activated Al2O3 in the form of porous pellets were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (Shanghai, P. R. China). Hydrogen gas (99.99%) was produced with a hydrogen generator (Shenyang Guangzheng Co., Shenyang, P. R. China).

Synthesis of Pd/Al2O3 catalysts

Activated Al2O3 pellets were first ground and screened to obtain particles with desirable diameters (20~40 mesh, 40~60 mesh, and 60~100 mesh), followed by washing with deionized (DI) water and oven drying at 120 °C for 12 h. Next, palladium were loaded on these sub-millimeter activated Al2O3 particle supports by spraying H2PdCl4 solution (10.5 mL containing 0.167 g PdCl2) evenly onto the support (10 g) through a spray bottle for three times. After each spraying, the sample was dried immediately at 100 °C for 1 h before the next spraying. Then, the sample was dried at 100 °C for 12 h, calcinated at 450 °C for 2 h in air, and subsequently reduced at 300 °C under H2 atmosphere for 30 min to obtain the desired Pd/Al2O3 catalyst. The obtained Pd/Al2O3 catalysts via the spray method were denoted as SP20, SP40 and SP60 according to their different support particle size. Palladium was also loaded onto the activated Al2O3 particle support (40~60 mesh) by the conventional incipient-wetness impregnation method followed by the same drying, calcination, and reduction process for comparison purpose, and the control sample was denoted as IM40.

Characterization of Pd/Al2O3 catalysts

The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of Pd/Al2O3 catalysts were obtained on a D/MAX-2004 X-ray powder diffractometer (Rigaku Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) with Ni-filtered Cu (λ = 0.15418 nm) radiation at 56 kV and 182 mA. Pd contents in these catalysts were determined with an inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometer (ICP-OES, 720-ES, Varian Inc, Palo Alto, CA, USA). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were conducted on an ESCALAB250 X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Waltham, MA, USA) with an Al K anode (1486.6 eV, photon energy, 300 W). Their morphologies and microstructures were observed by a SUPRA35 Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope (ZEISS, Germany) and a JEOL 2100 transmission electron microscope (JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) operating at 200 kV. Nitrogen adsorption-desorption measurements were performed with an Autosorb-1 Analyzer (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). Their specific surface areas were calculated using the standard Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) method and the mesopore size distributions were obtained by the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) method from the desorption branch data of nitrogen adsorption isotherm. The degree of dispersion of Pd nanoparticles on these catalysts was determined by the CO chemisorption method with an Auto Chem II 2920 (Micromeritics instrument Ltd., Norcross, GA, USA). Briefly, 150 mg catalyst was activated in a 10% H2/Ar stream (50 mL · min−1) at 250 °C for 1 h. After purging with an He flow (50 mL · min−1) for 0.5 h, the sample was cooled down to 30 °C. Then, the CO chemisorption was conducted using the pulse titration model. The degree of dispersion and average size of Pd nanoparticles were calculated with the assumption that the CO/Pd stoichiometry at 1.

Catalytic reduction experiments in the batch reactor

The catalytic reduction experiments in the batch reactor were carried out at room temperature (25 °C) and under the atmospheric pressure in a 250 mL three-necked flask reactor equipped with a mechanical Teflon stirrer. Briefly, 10 mg Pd/Al2O3 catalyst was grounded and added into the reactor containing 190 mL of DI water under mechanical stirring at 500 rpm followed by purging the reaction system with an H2 flow (200 mL·min−1) for 30 min. Then, 10 mL of bromate solution (8.0 mM) or methyl orange solution (1000 ppm) was added rapidly into the reactor and the suspension was continuously bubbled by an H2 flow (200 mL·min−1) under stirring. Samples were taken at selected time intervals and the catalyst was removed by centrifugation. The concentrations of bromate and bromide in the centrifugal supernatant were analyzed using Ion Chromatography (Dionex ICS 1100 Ion Chromatograph with a conductivity cell). A Dionex AS-22 column was used to separate bromate, bromide and other anions (4.2 mM carbonate and 1.4 mM bicarbonate buffer solutions as effluent). A 500 μL loop and a 25 μL loop were used to determine the concentrations of bromate and bromide at the microgram level and the milligram level, respectively. The detectable limitation for both bromate and bromide was lower than 1 ppb. The concentration of methyl orange was analyzed using UV-Vis spectrophotometer (UV-2550, SHIMADZU Corporation, Japan).

Catalytic reduction experiments in the packed fixed-bed reactor

The continuous flow catalytic reduction experiments were carried out in a lab-prepared, packed fixed-bed tube reactor with the inner diameter of 10 mm and the bed height of 100 mm. The Pd/Al2O3 catalyst was packed into the tube and the experiment was conducted with upright flow mode at room temperature and under the atmospheric pressure. 800 mL · h−1 bromate solution and 1 mL · min−1 hydrogen were introduced into the packed bed reactor simultaneously. Both reverse osmosis (RO) water containing 0.078 mM (10 ppm) bromate and natural mineral water containing 0.4 μM (51 ppb) bromate were used for the experiment. For the reduction of methyl orange, RO water containing 50 ppm methyl orange were used, and the experiment conditions were the same as the treatment of bromate solution.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Gao, Y. et al. Creation of Pd/Al2O3 Catalyst by a Spray Process for Fixed Bed Reactors and Its Effective Removal of Aqueous Bromate. Sci. Rep. 7, 41797; doi: 10.1038/srep41797 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Information
srep41797-s1.doc (2.8MB, doc)

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Basic Science Innovation Program of Shenyang National Laboratory for Materials Science (Grant No. Y4N56R1161 and Y4N56F2161), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51502305).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions Q.L. initiated and supervised all of the work and prepared the manuscript. Y.G. carried out the experiments and contributed to drafting the manuscript. W.S. developed the approach to prepare the Pd/Al2O3 catalyst. W.Y. revised the manuscript.

References

  1. Haag W. R. & Hoigne J. Ozonation of Bromide-Containing Waters: Kinetics of Formation of Hypobromous Acid and Bromate. Environ. Sci. Technol. 17, 261–267 (1983). [Google Scholar]
  2. Fischbacher A., Loppenberg K., von Sonntag C. & Schmidt T. C. A New Reaction Pathway for Bromite to Bromate in the Ozonation of Bromide. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49, 11714–11720 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. International Agency for Cancer Research. Agents Classified by the IARC Monographs, vol. 1–115 (IARC, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  4. World Health Organization. Bromate in Drinking-water, Background Document for Preparation of WHO Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality (WHO, 2005).
  5. World Health Organization. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality 4th ed (WHO, 2011).
  6. von Gunten U. Ozonation of drinking water: part II. Disinfection and byproduct formation in presence of bromide, iodide or chlorine. Water Res. 37, 1469–1487 (2003). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Commission of the European Communities. Establishing the List, Concentration Limits and Labeling Requirements for the Constituents of Natural Mineral Waters and the Conditions for Using Ozone-Enriched Air for the Treatment of Natural Mineral Waters and Spring Waters. Official Journal of the European Union 126, 34–39 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  8. Matos C. T., Velizarov S., Reis M. A. M. & Crespo J. O. G. Removal of Bromate from Drinking Water Using the Ion Exchange Membrane Bioreactor Concept. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42, 7702–7708 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Butler R., Godley A., Lytton L. & Cartmell E. Bromate Environmental Contamination: Review of Impact and Possible Treatment. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35, 193–217 (2005). [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang T., Hou P., Qiang Z., Lu X. & Wang Q. Reducing bromate formation with H+-form high silica zeolites during ozonation of bromide-containing water: Effectiveness and mechanisms. Chemosphere 82, 608–612 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Peldszus S. et al. Effect of medium-pressure UV irradiation on bromate concentrations in drinking water, a pilot-scale study. Water Res. 38, 211–217 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jung B., Nicola R., Batchelor B. & Abdel-Wahab A. Effect of low- and medium-pressure Hg UV irradiation on bromate removal in Advanced Reduction Process. Chemosphere 117, 663–672 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Siddiqui M. S., Amy G. L. & McCollum L. J. Bromate Destruction by UV Irradiation and Electric Arc Discharge. Ozone: Science & Engineering 18, 271–290 (1996). [Google Scholar]
  14. Xu C. et al. Bromate removal from aqueous solutions by nano crystalline akaganeite (β-FeOOH)-coated quartz sand (CACQS). Chemical Engineering Journal 187, 63–68 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen W., Zhang Z., Li Q. & Wang H. Adsorption of bromate and competition from oxyanions on cationic surfactant-modified granular activated carbon (GAC). Chemical Engineering Journal 203, 319–325 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  16. Listiarini K., Tor J. T., Sun D. D. & Leckie J. O. Hybrid coagulation–nanofiltration membrane for removal of bromate and humic acid in water. Journal of Membrane Science 365, 154–159 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  17. Wiśniewski J. A. & Kabsch-Korbutowicz M. Bromate removal in the ion-exchange process. Desalination 261, 197–201 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang Q., Snyder S., Kim J. & Chol H. Aqueous Ethanol modified Nanoscale Zerovalent Iron in Bromate Reduction: Synthesis, Characterization, and Reactivity. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 3292–3299 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhang Y., Jing S. & Liu H. Reactivity and mechanism of bromate reduction from aqueous solution using Zn–Fe(II)–Al layered double hydroxides. Chemical Engineering Journal 266, 21–27 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  20. Kishimoto N. & Matsuda N. Bromate Ion Removal by Electrochemical Reduction Using an Activated Carbon Felt Electrode. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 2054–2059 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Mao R., Zhao X., Lan H., Liu H. & Qu J. Efficient electrochemical reduction of bromate by a Pd/rGO/CFP electrode with low applied potentials. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 160–161, 179–187 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  22. Zhao X., Liu H., Shen Y. & Qu J. Photocatalytic reduction of bromate at C60 modified Bi2MoO6 under visible light irradiation. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 106, 63–68 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  23. Huang X., Wang L., Zhou J. & Gao N. Photocatalytic decomposition of bromate ion by the UV/P25-Graphene processes. Water Res. 57, 1–7 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. van Ginkel C. G., van Haperen A. M. & van der Togt B. Reduction of bromate to bromide coupled to acetate oxidation by anaerobic mixed microbial cultures. Water Res. 39, 59–64 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vorlop K. D. & Tacke T. First steps towards the removal of nitrate and nitrite from drinking water with noble metal catalysts. Chem. Eng. Technol. 61, 836–837 (1989). [Google Scholar]
  26. Sun W., Li Q., Gao S. & Shang J. K. Monometallic Pd/Fe3O4 catalyst for denitrification of water. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 125, 1–9 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  27. Kim M. S. et al. Catalytic reduction of nitrate in water over Pd-Cu/TiO2 catalyst: Effect of the strong metal-support interaction (SMSI) on the catalytic activity. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 142–143, 354–361 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  28. Lee J., Hur Y. G., Kim M.-S. & Lee K.-Y. Catalytic reduction of nitrite in water over ceria- and ceria–zirconia-supported Pd catalysts. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 399, 48–52 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang Y., Hurley K. D. & Shapley J. R. Heterogeneous catalytic reduction of perchlorate in water with Re-Pd/C catalysts derived from an oxorhenium(V) molecular precursor. Inorganic chemistry 50, 1534–1543 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kim Y. N. & Choi M. Synergistic integration of ion-exchange and catalytic reduction for complete decomposition of perchlorate in waste water. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 7503–7510 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kawabata T. et al. Liquid phase catalytic hydrodechlorination of aryl chlorides over Pd-Al-MCM-41 catalyst. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 66, 151–160 (2006). [Google Scholar]
  32. Celebi M., Yurderi M., Bulut A., Kaya M. & Zahmakiran M. Palladium nanoparticles supported on amine-functionalized SiO2 for the catalytic hexavalent chromium reduction. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 180, 53–64 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  33. Gao G. & Xu A. Efficient catalytic reduction of azo dyes by N,N-dimethylformamide mediated by viologen. New J. Chem. 38, 4661–4665 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen H. et al. Aqueous bromate reduction by catalytic hydrogenation over Pd/Al2O3 catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 96, 307–313 (2010). [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang P., Jiang F. & Chen H. Enhanced catalytic hydrogenation of aqueous bromate over Pd/mesoporous carbon nitride. Chemical Engineering Journal 234, 195–202 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  36. Freitas C. M. A. S. et al. Highly efficient reduction of bromate to bromide over mono and bimetallic ZSM5 catalysts. Green Chem. 17, 4247–4254 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  37. Lin K.-Y. A. & Chen S.-Y. Catalytic Reduction of Bromate Using ZIF-Derived Nanoscale Cobalt/Carbon Cages in the Presence of Sodium Borohydride. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 3, 3096–3103 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  38. Restivo J., Soares O. S. G. P., Órfão J. J. M. & Pereira M. F. R. Bimetallic activated carbon supported catalysts for the hydrogen reduction of bromate in water. Catalysis Today 249, 213–219 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  39. Restivo J., Soares O. S. G. P., Órfão J. J. M. & Pereira M. F. R. Metal assessment for the catalytic reduction of bromate in water under hydrogen. Chemical Engineering Journal 263, 119–126 (2015). [Google Scholar]
  40. Sun W., Li Q., Gao S. & Shang J. K. Highly efficient catalytic reduction of bromate in water over a quasi-monodisperse, superparamagnetic Pd/Fe3O4 catalyst. J. Mater. Chem. A. 1, 9215–9224 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  41. Chen H., Zhang P., Tan W., Jiang F. & Tang R. Palladium supported on amino functionalized magnetic MCM-41 for catalytic hydrogenation of aqueous bromate. RSC Adv. 4, 38743–38749 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  42. Guo K., Tang X. & Zhou X. Chemical Reaction Engineering, Ch. 7, 220–248 (Chemical Industry Press, 2000). [Google Scholar]
  43. Thakur D. B. et al. Ruthenium catalyst on carbon nanofiber support layers for use in silicon-based structured microreactors. Part II: Catalytic reduction of bromate contaminants in aqueous phase. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 102, 243–250 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  44. Marco Y. et al. Bromate catalytic reduction in continuous mode using metal catalysts supported on monoliths coated with carbon nanofibers. Chemical Engineering Journal 230, 605–611 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  45. Palomares A. E. et al. The use of Pd catalysts on carbon-based structured materials for the catalytic hydrogenation of bromates in different types of water. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 146, 186–191 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  46. Yaseneva P. et al. Efficient reduction of bromates using carbon nanofibre supported catalysts: Experimental and a comparative life cycle assessment study. Chemical Engineering Journal 248, 230–241 (2014). [Google Scholar]
  47. Sing K. S. W. et al. Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure & Appl. Chem. 57, 603–619 (1985). [Google Scholar]
  48. Ramirez J. H. et al. Azo-dye Orange II degradation by heterogeneous Fenton-like reaction using carbon-Fe catalysts. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental 75, 312–323 (2007). [Google Scholar]
  49. Mondal A., Adhikary B. & Mukherjee D. Room-temperature synthesis of air stable cobalt nanoparticles and their use as catalyst for methyl orange dye degradation. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 482, 248–257 (2015). [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information
srep41797-s1.doc (2.8MB, doc)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES