ABSTRACT
Insight into the mechanisms for arsenic detoxification by Geobacter species is expected to improve the understanding of global cycling of arsenic in iron-rich subsurface sedimentary environments. Analysis of 14 different Geobacter genomes showed that all of these species have genes coding for an arsenic detoxification system (ars operon), and several have genes required for arsenic respiration (arr operon) and methylation (arsM). Genes encoding four arsenic repressor-like proteins were detected in the genome of G. sulfurreducens; however, only one (ArsR1) regulated transcription of the ars operon. Elimination of arsR1 from the G. sulfurreducens chromosome resulted in enhanced transcription of genes coding for the arsenic efflux pump (Acr3) and arsenate reductase (ArsC). When the gene coding for Acr3 was deleted, cells were not able to grow in the presence of either the oxidized or reduced form of arsenic, while arsC deletion mutants could grow in the presence of arsenite but not arsenate. These studies shed light on how Geobacter influences arsenic mobility in anoxic sediments and may help us develop methods to remediate arsenic contamination in the subsurface.
IMPORTANCE This study examines arsenic transformation mechanisms utilized by Geobacter, a genus of iron-reducing bacteria that are predominant in many anoxic iron-rich subsurface environments. Geobacter species play a major role in microbially mediated arsenic release from metal hydroxides in the subsurface. This release raises arsenic concentrations in drinking water to levels that are high enough to cause major health problems. Therefore, information obtained from studies of Geobacter should shed light on arsenic cycling in iron-rich subsurface sedimentary environments, which may help reduce arsenic-associated illnesses. These studies should also help in the development of biosensors that can be used to detect arsenic contaminants in anoxic subsurface environments. We examined 14 different Geobacter genomes and found that all of these species possess genes coding for an arsenic detoxification system (ars operon), and some also have genes required for arsenic respiration (arr operon) and arsenic methylation (arsM).
KEYWORDS: ars operon, Geobacter, iron reduction, detoxification, genetics, transcriptomics, arsenic
INTRODUCTION
Arsenic is a naturally occurring metalloid that is found in many minerals, usually in conjunction with such metals as iron, lead, nickel, copper, and cobalt (1). Both inorganic and organic arsenic forms are found in soils, sediments, water, and living organisms, with inorganic forms being most abundant (2, 3). In the environment, the oxidized form of inorganic arsenic [arsenate; As(V)] is relatively nonmobile as it strongly adsorbs to such minerals as ferrihydrite and alumina. The reduced form, arsenite [As(III)], on the other hand, does not adsorb well to many minerals, making it highly mobile (4). Arsenite is also 25 to 60 times more toxic than its nonmobile counterpart (5) and poses a greater environmental threat.
The toxic nature and prevalence of arsenic in the environment have led to the evolution of several different arsenic transformation systems within bacteria (3). Some bacteria are able to methylate arsenic with S-adenosyl-l-methionine-dependent methyltransferase (ArsM), forming volatile methylarsines, which removes arsenic from the immediate environment by converting it into a gaseous compound (6). Other prokaryotes utilize arr and/or ars arsenic transformation systems. While both systems involve reduction of arsenate, only the dissimilatory arsenate reductase system (arr) allows an organism to gain energy from coupling the oxidation of an electron donor with the reduction of arsenate.
Arsenic is frequently coprecipitated with iron hydroxides and sulfides in sedimentary rocks (7). In fact, arsenopyrite, a compound of iron, arsenic, and sulfur, is the most common arsenic mineral found in nature (8). Therefore, it does not seem too surprising that studies have shown that Fe(III)-respiring bacteria such as Geobacter are frequently involved in microbially mediated arsenic release from flooded soils and anoxic sediments (9–17).
Analysis of available Geobacter genomes has revealed that all Geobacter species have genes coding for an arsenic detoxification system (ars genes), and a few of them have the machinery required for arsenate respiration (arr genes). The presence of ars genes in Geobacter is not unusual as arsenic resistance (ars) genes have been found in genomes from a diversity of cultured and uncultivated bacteria (18–26); however, the functionality of Ars proteins has only been determined in one other genetically tractable strictly anaerobic dissimilatory metal-reducing subsurface bacterium, Desulfovibrio desulfuricans (27). Although genetic studies have been carried out on homologous Ars proteins from facultative anaerobes (28–31), it is premature to assume that Ars proteins function in a similar manner in strict anaerobes until more information is available. Therefore, bioinformatic, transcriptomic, and genetic studies were done to determine the role that the various Ars proteins play in arsenic resistance by G. sulfurreducens, another environmentally significant anaerobic bacterium.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Arsenic detoxification machinery in Geobacter.
All of the Geobacter genomes available to date have the arsenic detoxification machinery (ars genes), whereas only a few Geobacter species have genes required for arsenite methylation (arsM) and arsenate respiration (arr genes) (Table 1). G. lovleyi, G. uraniireducens, and Geobacter sp. strain OR-1 are the only species or strains whose genomes carry genes from the arr operon, and all three of these organisms are capable of arsenate respiration (9, 10, 32). It also appears that three of the species within the genus Geobacter (G. metallireducens, G. uraniireducens, and G. lovleyi) have genes that could potentially code for arsenite S-adenosylmethyltransferase (ArsM) proteins. These proteins are homologous to the characterized ArsM protein from Rhodopseudomonas palustris (33): the Glov_0896, Gura_2444, and Gmet_2791 gene products are 51%, 56%, and 55% similar, respectively.
TABLE 1.
Arsenic detoxification and respiratory genes found in the genomes of the Geobacter species and strains used in this study
| Annotation | Gene name | Gene found in: |
|||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| G. sulfurreducens | Geobacter sp. strain M21 | Geobacter sp. strain M18 | G. bemidjiensis | G. uraniireducens | G. metallireducens | G. lovleyi | G. bremensis | G. daltonii | Geobacter sp. strain OR-1 | G. pickeringii | G. argillaceus | G. soli | G. anodireducens | ||
| ABC transporter, permease protein | GSU2950 | Gbem_0431 | Gmet_0524 | K419DRAFT_03027 | Ga0069501_11275 | Ga0077628_112470 | Ga0133348_113083 | ||||||||
| ABC transporter, ATP-binding protein | tauB | GSU2951 | Gbem_0430 | Gmet_0523 | K419DRAFT_03028 | Ga0069501_11276 | Ga0077628_112471 | Ga0133348_113084 | |||||||
| DNA-binding transcriptional repressor (helix turn helix) | arsR | GSU2952 | GM21_1872 | GM18_1516 | Gbem_2350 | Gura_0468 | Gmet_0522 | Glov_1154 | K419DRAFT_00586 | Geob_2213 | Ga0098289_102202 | Ga0069501_11744 | Ga0052872_03142 | Ga0077628_112472 | Ga0133348_113085 |
| GSU2625 | GM21_1776 | GM18_2299 | Gbem_1845 | Gura_0439 | Gmet_0846 | Glov_1189 | K419DRAFT_00674 | Geob_3457 | Ga0098289_10561 | Ga0052872_00732 | Ga0077628_11451 | Ga0133348_11965 | |||
| GSU0399 | GM21_4069 | GM18_2397 | Gbem_2441 | Gura_1710 | Glov_1665 | K419DRAFT_00388 | Geob_2249 | Ga0098289_1176 | Ga0052872_01025 | Ga0077628_113344 | Ga0133348_11381 | ||||
| GSU2149 | GM21_0522 | GM18_1826 | Gbem_1345 | Gura_4223 | Glov_0357 | K419DRAFT_04127 | Geob_0483 | Ga0098289_101332 | Ga0052872_02405 | ||||||
| GM21_2939 | GM18_1204 | Gura_3309 | Geob_0528 | Ga0098289_102250 | |||||||||||
| GM18_3417 | Gura_2445 | Geob_2068 | Ga0098289_107231 | ||||||||||||
| Arsenate reductase (thioredoxin activating) | arsC | GSU2953 | GM21_1874 | GM18_1515 | Gbem_2348 | Gmet_0521 | Glov_0597 | K419DRAFT_00584 | Ga0098289_102203 | Ga0069007_111441 | Ga0052872_03143 | Ga0077628_112473 | Ga0133348_113086 | ||
| Integral membrane efflux pump | acr3 | GSU2954 | GM21_1873 | GM18_1514 | Gbem_2349 | Gura_0467 | Gmet_0520 | Glov_1155 | K419DRAFT_00585 | Geob_2214 | Ga0098289_102204 | Ga0069007_111442 | Ga0052872_03144 | Ga0077628_112474 | Ga0133348_113087 |
| Ga0098289_10562 | |||||||||||||||
| Permease DUF318 family | arsP | GSU2955 | GM21_1875 | Gura_0438 | Gmet_0519 | Glov_1178 | Geob_3501 | Ga0098289_102252 | |||||||
| Geob_2903 | Ga0098289_12258 | ||||||||||||||
| Redox active disulfide protein | trx3 | GSU2956 | GM21_1877 | GM18_2400 | Gura_0436 | Gmet_0518 | Glov_1184 | Geob_3502 | Ga0098289_102262 | Ga0052872_00157 | |||||
| Ga0098289_10573 | |||||||||||||||
| Thioredoxin family protein | trxA | GSU2957 | GM21_1878 | GM18_2401 | Gbem_0404 | Gura_0435 | Gmet_0517 | Glov_1185 | K419DRAFT_03989 | Geob_3503 | Ga0098289_10574 | Ga0069501_113062 | Ga0052872_01678 | Ga0077628_112757 | Ga0133348_113405 |
| GSU3281 | GM21_0404 | GM18_3976 | Gura_0363 | Gmet_3230 | Glov_0505 | Geob_1303 | Ga0098289_102264 | ||||||||
| Ga0098289_102214 | |||||||||||||||
| Ga0098289_103279 | |||||||||||||||
| Thiol-disulfide interchange protein | dsbD | GSU2958 | GM21_1879 | GM18_2402 | Gura_0434 | Gmet_0516 | Glov_1186 | Geob_3504 | Ga0098289_102265 | ||||||
| Ga0098289_10575 | |||||||||||||||
| Co/Zn/Cd cation transporter-like protein | cdf | GSU2959 | GM21_1876 | GM18_0478 | Gbem_2347 | Gura_3416 | Gmet_0515 | Glov_1190 | K419DRAFT_00583 | Geob_0736 | Ga0098289_102253 | Ga0069501_11586 | Ga0052872_02403 | Ga0077628_112476 | Ga0133348_113089 |
| Glov_1191 | Ga0098289_106193 | ||||||||||||||
| Arsenical resistance operon trans-acting repressor ArsD | arsD | Gura_1382 | Ga0098289_10564 | ||||||||||||
| Ga0098289_102209 | |||||||||||||||
| Ga0098289_102212 | |||||||||||||||
| Molybdopterin-containing oxidoreductase (PMO) family | arrA | Gura_0470 | Glov_1149 | Ga0098289_10560 | |||||||||||
| 4Fe-4S ferredoxin iron-sulfur binding domain protein | arrB | Gura_0471 | Glov_1148 | Ga0098289_10559 | |||||||||||
| S-Adenosyl–l-methionine:methylarsonite As-methyltransferase | arsM | Gura_2444 | Gmet_2791 | Glov_0896 | |||||||||||
Similar to the case in other arsenic-resistant bacteria (34), Geobacter ars genes are arranged in clusters, and many of them are cotranscribed (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). ArsR is a trans-acting repressor involved in the regulation of the ars operon, ArsC is an arsenate reductase that reduces arsenate to arsenite prior to efflux, and Acr3 is a transmembrane antiporter (35–37) that pumps arsenite out of the cell.
The gene coding for ArsC was found in all of the Geobacter genomes except G. uraniireducens and G. daltonii (9, 32). However, the G. uraniireducens genome has a gene coding for dissimilatory arsenate reductase (ArrA), which can also reduce As(V) to As(III) for extrusion from the cell.
It was interesting to find that Geobacter ArsC proteins are homologous to thioredoxin-activating ArsC proteins, which use thioredoxin as a source of reducing power. These proteins have three highly conserved cysteine residues located at amino acid positions 12, 82, and 89, are primarily associated with low-G+C Gram-positive bacteria, and prior to this study had only been found in two other Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans) (2, 38–40). Other characterized ArsC proteins from Gram-negative bacteria have six conserved amino acid residues (His8, Cys12, Ser15, Arg60, Arg94, and Arg107) and use glutaredoxin as an electron donor.
Geobacter and other deltaproteobacterial species are Gram-negative; however, their ArsC proteins do not cluster within the glutaredoxin clade. Rather, they all have three cysteine residues at positions 12, 82, and 89 (see Fig. S2A in the supplemental material). Phylogenetic trees made from ArsC protein alignments also showed that Geobacter and other deltaproteobacterial ArsC proteins fall within the thioredoxin binding clade, while most other Gram-negative bacteria cluster within the glutaredoxin clade (Fig. S2B).
Further analysis of Geobacter and deltaproteobacterial ArsC sequences indicated that these genes are unlikely to have been acquired recently via horizontal gene transfer as no plasmid, transposon, or phage-related genes were located in the vicinity of arsC and the percentage of G+C content of all of the arsC genes was within 7% of their overall genomes. Therefore, if these genes were acquired via horizontal gene transfer, it would have occurred in the distant evolutionary past. However, it is interesting to note that many deltaproteobacteria form syntrophic partnerships with low-G+C Gram-positive bacteria, and this close proximity would have made it easy to acquire these genes at some point in the past (41). Although lateral gene transfer of the arsC gene between deltaproteobacteria and low-G+C Gram-positive bacteria is not apparent, other studies have found that these two groups of organisms have exchanged other genes such as dsrAB (dissimilatory sulfite reductase) and aps (adenosine 5-phosphosulfate reductase) (42–44).
Consistent with Geobacter ArsC protein structure, several of the Geobacter ars operons have genes (trxA) coding for a thioredoxin domain protein (Table 1). While all of the Geobacter species have at least one copy of a thioredoxin domain protein gene (trxA) in their genome, trxA clusters with the arsC gene in only 3 of the 14 Geobacter genomes examined (G. sulfurreducens, Geobacter sp. strain M21, and G. metallireducens). This gene and another thioredoxin-like gene (trx3) are more highly transcribed in G. sulfurreducens cells grown in the presence of 0.1 mM arsenite (Fig. 1), indicating that thioredoxin might play a role in electron transfer by G. sulfurreducens to ArsC. However, trxA, trx3, and trxA trx3 deletion mutant strains did not have these phenotypes when grown in the presence of either arsenite (0.1 mM) or arsenate (5 mM) (see Fig. S3 in the supplemental material). One would also expect that if a thioredoxin protein were required for function of ArsC, its gene would be cotranscribed with the arsC gene more consistently across the genus.
FIG 1.
Relative changes in expression of ars operon genes compared to expression of the constitutively expressed proC gene in G. sulfurreducens cells grown in the presence or absence of 0.1 mM arsenite. Acetate (10 mM) was provided as the electron donor, and fumarate (50 mM) was provided as the electron acceptor for all conditions. All conditions were tested in triplicate.
Both the arsenic respiratory and detoxification systems are regulated by the ArsR repressor protein, which is induced by arsenite. A copy of the gene coding for ArsR is found in all of the Geobacter ars operons examined in this study. In addition, all of the Geobacter species have other genes coding for ArsR-SmtB family proteins scattered throughout their genomes (Table 1). For example, G. sulfurreducens, G. bemidjiensis, G. lovleyi, G. argillaceus, and G. bremensis all have 4 arsR-like homologues, G. uraniireducens, G. daltonii, and Geobacter sp. strains M18 and OR-1 have 6 homologues, Geobacter sp. strain M21 has 5, G. soli and G. anodireducens have 3, and G. metallireducens has two arsR homologues.
The ars detoxification system in G. sulfurreducens.
Bioinformatic and gap reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR) analyses showed that the ars operon in G. sulfurreducens is composed of 10 genes (GSU2950 to -2959) (Fig. S1), and rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) showed that the 5′ untranscribed region (UTR) includes a region 97 bp upstream from GSU2950. Genes found in the ars operon include a gene coding for an ABC transporter permease and ATP-binding protein (GSU2950-GSU2951), arsR (GSU2952), arsC (GSU2953), acr3 (GSU2954), arsP (GSU2955), trx3 (GSU2956), trxA (GSU2957), dsbD (GSU2958), and a gene coding for a cation efflux protein (GSU2959) from the cation diffusion facilitator (CDF) family of transporters. All 10 of these genes were upregulated in G. sulfurreducens cells grown in the presence of 0.1 mM As(III) compared to cells grown without exposure to arsenic (Fig. 1).
Regulation of the ars operon.
The G. sulfurreducens genome has four different genes coding for putative ArsR-Smt family regulatory proteins scattered throughout the genome: GSU2952 (arsR1), GSU2149 (arsR2), GSU0399 (arsR3), and GSU2625 (arsR4). All four of these genes' proteins have the helix-turn-helix (HTH) motif that is characteristic of DNA binding transcriptional regulators (see Fig. S4A in the supplemental material), and all of them are found near transport proteins. The arsR1 gene is part of the ars operon, arsR2 is located 529 bp upstream from a gene coding for heavy metal-translocating P-type ATPase protein (GSU2147; cadA), arsR3 is located just downstream from an operon that contains genes coding for subunits of a multidrug efflux transporter (GSU0391 to -0394), and arsR4 is found downstream from genes coding for an ABC-type oligopeptide transport system (GSU2623-GSU2624). However, only ArsR1 and ArsR2 have the metal-binding motif (ELCVCDL) that allows metals to bind to ArsR and the vicinal cysteine pair (Cys-32 and Cys-34) that is part of the inducer (AsIII) binding domain of ArsR in Escherichia coli and Shewanella (Fig. S4) (29, 45).
In addition to ArsR1 and ArsR2 being the only HTH proteins with conserved metal binding sites, their associated genes (arsR1 and arsR2) were the only arsR-like genes differentially transcribed in the presence of 0.1 mM arsenite (Fig. 2). However, the number of arsR2 mRNA transcripts only slightly increased in the presence of arsenite, while a significant increase in transcription of arsR1 was observed. Further comparison of ArsR2 amino acid sequences with other regulatory proteins from the ArsR-Smt family suggests that ArsR2 is more closely related to CadC regulatory proteins (Fig. S4A and S4B), which makes sense because it is located upstream from a gene coding for a putative CadA protein.
FIG 2.
Relative changes in expression of the arsR1, arsR2, arsR3, and arsR4 genes relative to the constitutively expressed proC gene in G. sulfurreducens cells grown in the presence or absence of 0.1 mM arsenite. Acetate (10 mM) was provided as the electron donor, and fumarate (50 mM) was provided as the electron acceptor for all conditions. All conditions were tested in triplicate.
In order to determine which of these arsenic repressor proteins is involved in regulation of the ars operon, arsR1, arsR2, arsR3, and arsR4 deletion mutant strains were constructed in G. sulfurreducens. The only repressor mutant strain that exhibited a phenotype was the ΔarsR1 mutant (Fig. 3). The lag period for growth in the presence of 0.1 mM As(III) was shorter in the arsR1 deletion mutant than in the wild type, and the mutant's doubling time in the presence of As(III) was slightly faster than that of the wild type (8 versus 9 h) (Fig. 3A). This shortened lag period was not observed in the arsR2 mutant or the arsR1 complement. The finding that the arsR1 complement strain grew slower than the wild-type strain can most likely be explained by the fact that arsR1 was expressed from a plasmid carrying a second antibiotic resistance marker. Previous studies have shown that plasmids and multiple antibiotic cassettes can interfere with the normal proliferation of an organism, thereby slowing down growth rates and reducing final cell densities (46). Growth rates of Geobacter complement strains are almost always slower than that of the wild type using this genetic approach (47). Growth of the other two complement strains constructed in this study (acr3 and arsC complements) was also slightly slower than that in the wild-type strain.
FIG 3.

(A) Growth of the wild-type, arsR1 deletion mutant, arsR2 deletion mutant, and arsR1-complemented strains in the presence of 0.1 mM As(III). (B) Relative changes in expression of the acr3, arsC, arsR1, and arsR2 genes compared to expression of the constitutively expressed proC gene in the wild-type and arsR1 and arsR2 deletion mutant strains grown in the presence or absence of 0.1 mM As(III). Total RNA was extracted from cells after 20 h of incubation. All conditions were conducted in triplicate.
Transcription of arsC and acr3 genes also notably increased in ΔarsR1 cells grown in the presence and absence of As(III) (Fig. 3B). The number of arsC mRNA transcripts was ∼100-fold higher in arsR1 mutant strains than in the wild type in the presence and absence of As(III), and acr3 transcript levels were 67- and 4-fold higher in ΔarsR1 cells than wild-type cells in the presence or absence of As(III), respectively. Transcription of acr3 and arsC, on the other hand, was not impacted by deletion of the arsR2 gene. These results suggest that the ars operon is regulated by arsR1.
Characterization of the ars operon in G. sulfurreducens.
In order to confirm that expression of ars genes is involved in arsenic detoxification in G. sulfurreducens, transcription of arsR1, acr3, and arsC under various concentrations of arsenite was quantified by quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) (Fig. 4). The numbers of acr3, arsC, and arsR1 mRNA transcripts were 59, 83, and 429 times more abundant in cells grown in the presence of 0.3 mM As(III) than in cells grown without exposure to arsenic.
FIG 4.
Relative changes in expression of the arsR1, acr3, and arsC genes compared to expression of the constitutively expressed proC gene in G. sulfurreducens cells grown in the presence of various concentrations of arsenite. All points represent the average from triplicate samples.
Deletion of ars genes from G. sulfurreducens cells further supported their involvement in arsenic detoxification. When the gene coding for Acr3 was deleted from the chromosome, growth on both As(III) and As(V) was impaired (Fig. 5). While wild-type strains were able to grow in the presence of 0.3 mM As(III) or 12.5 mM As(V), growth of the acr3 deletion mutant strain was impaired at As(III) concentrations as low as 0.025 mM As(III) and 2.5 mM As(V). The phenotype of the arsC deletion mutant was similar to that of the wild type when grown in the presence of As(III), as would be expected since the efflux pump (acr3) was fully functional in this strain. However, growth of the arsC mutant strain was diminished in the presence of As(V), and it had a similar phenotype on As(V) to the acr3 mutant (Fig. 5B). Complementation of both of these genes restored function and allowed growth in the presence of As(III) and As(V) similar to that of the wild type.
FIG 5.
Maximum OD600 after 45 h of incubation for the wild-type and deletion mutant acr3 and arsC strains of G. sulfurreducens in the presence of increasing levels of (A) arsenite [As(III)] or (B) arsenate [As(V)]. Cells were grown with acetate (10 mM) as the electron donor and fumarate (50 mM) as the electron acceptor. All points represent the average from triplicate samples.
Implications.
The prevalence and redundancy of many of these arsenic transformation genes within the genus Geobacter show how frequently these organisms are likely to encounter this metalloid in the environment. Studies have shown that Geobacter species are major players in microbially mediated arsenic release from metal hydroxides, which is a common cause of elevated arsenic concentrations (those exceeding 10 μg/liter) in drinking water. In South and Southeast Asia, tens of millions of people are exposed to chronic arsenic poisoning annually by drinking groundwater (48) in which bound arsenic is released from sediments by dissimilatory metal-respiring bacteria such as Geobacter (11, 12, 14, 49). Mobilization of arsenic is then further enhanced by species that can transform arsenic to its more mobile form (arsenite), which readily leaches into drinking water supplies. Because Geobacter species are responsible for much of this microbially mediated arsenic release, a better understanding of the mechanisms that they use for arsenic transformation should help us develop methods that can reduce the problem of arsenic-contaminated drinking water in many environments.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and culture conditions.
G. sulfurreducens strain DL1 (ATCC 51573) was obtained from our laboratory culture collection. Cells were grown under anaerobic conditions in a previously described bicarbonate-buffered, defined medium (50) supplemented with acetate (10 mM) as the electron donor and fumarate (50 mM) as the electron acceptor. Cells were incubated at 30°C in the dark under an N2-CO2 (80:20) atmosphere. Arsenic was added to cultures from anoxic stocks of sodium (meta)arsenite (NaAsO2;10 mM) and sodium arsenate (Na2HAsO4; 10 mM).
Analytical techniques.
Acetate concentrations were determined with an HP series 1100 high-pressure liquid chromatograph (Hewlett Packard, Palo Alto, CA) with a Bio-Rad fast acid analysis column (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), with an eluent of 8 mM H2SO4 and UV absorbance detection at 210 nm as previously described (51).
G. sulfurreducens cells were counted with acridine orange staining and epifluorescence microscopy as previously described (52). Cells were diluted 100-fold, fixed with a 10% glutaraldehyde solution, and stained with acridine orange (0.01% final concentration). The stained sample (1 ml) was then concentrated with a vacuum pump (pressure of ca. 150 mm Hg) onto a 0.2-μm-pore-size polycarbonate membrane filter (Millipore) and visualized by fluorescence microscopy on a Nikon Eclipse E600 microscope.
Extraction of RNA from samples.
RNA was prepared from triplicate cultures for all growth conditions, and all solutions used during the RNA extraction process were prepared with diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water (Ambion, Foster City, CA). Batch cultures (50 ml) were grown with acetate (10 mM) as an electron donor and fumarate (50 mM) as an electron acceptor in the presence of various concentrations of arsenite (0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mM) or arsenate (0, 2.5, 4, 5, and 10 mM) and harvested during exponential growth. Cells were split into 50-ml conical tubes (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA) and pelleted by centrifugation at 3,000 × g for 15 min. RNA was then extracted with the RNEasy Plus minikit (Qiagen) and treated with DNA-free DNase (Ambion) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All RNA samples were checked for integrity by agarose gel electrophoresis and had A260/A280 ratios of 1.8 to 2.0, indicating that they were of high purity (53). In order to ensure that RNA samples were not contaminated with DNA, PCR amplification with primers targeting the 16S rRNA gene was conducted on RNA samples that had not undergone reverse transcription.
Analysis of the ars operon in G. sulfurreducens.
In order to determine the size of the ars operon in G. sulfurreducens, primers were designed to link consecutive genes within the putative operon (see Table S1A in the supplemental material). cDNA was generated from RNA (1 μg) extracted from Geobacter cells grown in the presence of 0.1 mM arsenite with the Durascript enhanced avian reverse transcriptase single-strand synthesis kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO) according to the manufacturer's instructions and used as a template for the various PCRs. The 5′/3′ RACE (rapid amplification of cDNA ends) kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) was used to perform rapid amplification of 5′ cDNA ends (5′ RACE) to find the start of the G. sulfurreducens ars operon. For 5′ RACE, single-stranded cDNAs were first synthesized with sp1 (Table S1A) and transcriptor reverse transcriptase. After purification of the single-stranded cDNA with the High Pure PCR purification kit (Roche), terminal transferase was used to add a poly(A) tail at the 5′ end. Two rounds of PCR were then conducted with sp2 and the oligo(dT) anchor primer and sp3 and the PCR anchor primer.
qRT-PCR.
Genome sequence data obtained from the DOE Joint Genome Institute (JGI) website (www.jgi.doe.gov) were used to design quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) primers. All qRT-PCR primers (Table S1B) were designed according to the manufacturer's specifications (amplicon sizes of 100 to 200 bp), and representative products from each of these primer sets were verified by sequencing.
The Superscript III first-strand synthesis SuperMix for qRT-PCR (Invitrogen) was used to generate cDNA from 1 μg total RNA. Once the appropriate cDNA fragments were generated by RT-PCR, qRT-PCR amplification and detection were performed with the 7500 real-time PCR system (Applied Biosystems). Optimal qRT-PCR conditions were determined using the manufacturer's guidelines. Each PCR mixture consisted of a total volume of 25 μl and contained 1.5 μl of the appropriate primers (stock concentrations, 15 μM) and 12.5 μl Power SYBR green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems). Standard curves covering 8 orders of magnitude were constructed with serial dilutions of known amounts of purified cDNA quantified with a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer at an absorbance of 260 nm.
Construction of deletion mutants and complements.
The sequences of all primer pairs used for construction of the deletion mutants used in this study are listed in Table S1C. All mutants were constructed by replacement of the gene of interest with a gentamicin resistance cassette as previously described (54). Restriction digestions were carried out according to the manufacturer's instructions, and JumpStart AccuTaq LA DNA polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich) was used for all PCRs.
Primer pairs were designed to amplify regions approximately 500 bp downstream and upstream of the target genes and to add AvrII (CCTAGG) restriction sites to the PCR products. These products were digested with AvrII restriction endonuclease (NEB, Beverly, MA), ethanol precipitated, and ligated with T4 DNA ligase (NEB). The ligation reaction mixture was then loaded onto an agarose gel, and a 1-kb band was purified with the Qiaquick gel extraction kit (Qiagen) and ligated into the pCR2.1 TOPO cloning vector, resulting in the formation of PCR2.1up5′+3′dn. Sanger sequencing was done to verify the sequence of the cloned product. A gentamicin resistance cassette was amplified with flanking AvrII restriction sites by PCR using the pBSL141 plasmid as a template. Both the gentamicin cassette and the PCR2.1up5′+3′dn plasmid were digested with AvrII. The gentamicin cassette was ligated into the PCR2.1up5′+3′dn plasmid to complete construction of the mutant allele.
Plasmids carrying mutant alleles were linearized by digestion with KpnI (GGTACC) (NEB) and concentrated by ethanol precipitation. These linearized plasmids were electroporated into G. sulfurreducens strain DL1 as previously described (47). Isolated colonies were grown on agar plates supplemented with fumarate (50 mM), acetate (10 mM), and gentamicin (20 μg/ml). Replacement of wild-type alleles by mutant alleles in the G. sulfurreducens chromosome was verified by PCR and sequencing.
Deletion mutants made in this study were complemented by amplifying the respective genes with their native ribosome binding site (RBS) and ligating them into a plasmid with a constitutive lac promoter (pCM66) (55). Primers (Table S1C) were designed to introduce XbaI (TCTAGA) and BamHI (GGATCC) restriction sites into the PCR product. After digestion of pCM66 and the PCR product with XbaI and BamHI, the gene of interest was ligated downstream from the lac promoter with T4 DNA ligase. After complementary plasmids were constructed, they were introduced into ars mutant cells by electroporation as previously described (47).
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
This research was supported by the Office of Science (BER), U.S. Department of Energy, award no. DE-SC0006790.
Footnotes
Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02689-16.
REFERENCES
- 1.Nriagu JO. 2002. Arsenic poisoning through the ages, p 1–26. In Frankenberger WT. (ed), Environmental chemistry of arsenic. CRC Press, Dekker, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mukhopadhyay R, Rosen BP, Phung LT, Silver S. 2002. Microbial arsenic: from geocycles to genes and enzymes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 26:311–325. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2002.tb00617.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Oremland RS, Stolz JF. 2003. The ecology of arsenic. Science 300:939–944. doi: 10.1126/science.1081903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Smedley PL, Kinniburgh DG. 2002. A review of the source, behaviour and distribution of arsenic in natural waters. Appl Geochem 17:517–568. doi: 10.1016/S0883-2927(02)00018-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Korte N, Fernando Q. 1991. A review of arsenic(III) in groundwater. Crit Rev Environ Control 21:1–39. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Bentley R, Chasteen TG. 2002. Microbial methylation of metalloids: arsenic, antimony, and bismuth. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 66:250–271. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.66.2.250-271.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mandal BK, Suzuki KT. 2002. Arsenic round the world: a review. Talanta 58:201–235. doi: 10.1016/S0039-9140(02)00268-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Henke KR. (ed). 2009. Arsenic: environmental chemistry, health threats and waste treatment, p 69–235. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Hoboken, NJ. [Google Scholar]
- 9.Giloteaux L, Holmes DE, Williams KH, Wrighton KC, Wilkins MJ, Montgomery AP, Smith JA, Orellana R, Thompson CA, Roper TJ, Long PE, Lovley DR. 2013. Characterization and transcription of arsenic respiration and resistance genes during in situ uranium bioremediation. ISME J 7:370–383. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ohtsuka T, Yamaguchi N, Makino T, Sakurai K, Kimura K, Kudo K, Homma E, Dong DT, Amachi S. 2013. Arsenic dissolution from Japanese paddy soil by a dissimilatory arsenate-reducing bacterium Geobacter sp. OR-1. Environ Sci Technol 47:6263–6271. doi: 10.1021/es400231x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Islam FS, Gault AG, Boothman C, Polya DA, Charnock JM, Chatterjee D, Lloyd JR. 2004. Role of metal-reducing bacteria in arsenic release from Bengal delta sediments. Nature 430:68–71. doi: 10.1038/nature02638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Hery M, van Dongen BE, Gill F, Mondal D, Vaughan DJ, Pancost RD, Polya DA, Lloyd JR. 2010. Arsenic release and attenuation in low organic carbon aquifer sediments from West Bengal. Geobiology 8:155–168. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4669.2010.00233.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lear G, Song B, Gault AG, Polya DA, Lloyd JR. 2007. Molecular analysis of arsenate-reducing bacteria within Cambodian sediments following amendment with acetate. Appl Environ Microbiol 73:1041–1048. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01654-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hery M, Rizoulis A, Sanguin H, Cooke DA, Pancost RD, Polya DA, Lloyd JR. 2015. Microbial ecology of arsenic-mobilizing Cambodian sediments: lithological controls uncovered by stable-isotope probing. Environ Microbiol 17:1857–1869. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ying SC, Damashek J, Fendorf S, Francis CA. 2015. Indigenous arsenic(V)-reducing microbial communities in redox-fluctuating near-surface sediments of the Mekong Delta. Geobiology 13:581–587. doi: 10.1111/gbi.12152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hassan Z, Sultana M, Westerhoff H, Khan S, Roling W. 3 November 2015. Iron cycling potentials of arsenic contaminated groundwater in Bangladesh as revealed by enrichment cultivation. Geomicrobiol J doi: 10.1080/01490451.2015.1111471. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Osborne TH, McArthur JM, Sikdar PK, Santini JM. 2015. Isolation of an arsenate-respiring bacterium from a redox front in an arsenic-polluted aquifer in West Bengal, Bengal Basin. Environ Sci Technol 49:4193–4199. doi: 10.1021/es504707x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Silver S, Phung LT. 2005. Genes and enzymes involved in bacterial oxidation and reduction of inorganic arsenic. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:599–608. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.2.599-608.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhao CG, Zhang Y, Chan ZH, Chen SC, Yang SP.. 2015. Insights into arsenic multi-operons expression and resistance mechanisms in Rhodopseudomonas palustris CGA009. Front Microbiol 6:986. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lv C, Zhao C, Yang S, Qu Y. 2012. Arsenic metabolism in purple nonsulfur bacteria. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 52:1497–1507. (In Chinese.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Butcher BG, Rawlings DE. 2002. The divergent chromosomal ars operon of Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans is regulated by an atypical ArsR protein. Microbiology 148:3983–3992. doi: 10.1099/00221287-148-12-3983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Branco R, Chung AP, Morais PV. 2008. Sequencing and expression of two arsenic resistance operons with different functions in the highly arsenic-resistant strain Ochrobactrum tritici SCII24T. BMC Microbiol 8:95. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Desoeuvre A, Casiot C, Hery M. 2016. Diversity and distribution of arsenic-related genes along a pollution gradient in a river affected by acid mine drainage. Microb Ecol 71:672–685. doi: 10.1007/s00248-015-0710-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xiao KQ, Li LG, Ma LP, Zhang SY, Bao P, Zhang T, Zhu YG. 2016. Metagenomic analysis revealed highly diverse microbial arsenic metabolism genes in paddy soils with low-arsenic contents. Environ Pollut 211:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhang SY, Zhao FJ, Sun GX, Su JQ, Yang XR, Li H, Zhu YG. 2015. Diversity and abundance of arsenic biotransformation genes in paddy soils from southern China. Environ Sci Technol 49:4138–4146. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.5b00028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cuebas M, Villafane A, McBride M, Yee N, Bini E. 2011. Arsenate reduction and expression of multiple chromosomal ars operons in Geobacillus kaustophilus A1. Microbiology 157:2004–2011. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.048678-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li X, Krumholz LR. 2007. Regulation of arsenate resistance in Desulfovibrio desulfuricans G20 by an arsRBCC operon and an arsC gene. J Bacteriol 189:3705–3711. doi: 10.1128/JB.01913-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Saltikov CW, Wildman RA Jr, Newman DK. 2005. Expression dynamics of arsenic respiration and detoxification in Shewanella sp. strain ANA-3. J Bacteriol 187:7390–7396. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.21.7390-7396.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Murphy JN, Saltikov CW. 2009. The ArsR repressor mediates arsenite-dependent regulation of arsenate respiration and detoxification operons of Shewanella sp. strain ANA-3. J Bacteriol 191:6722–6731. doi: 10.1128/JB.00801-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Achour-Rokbani A, Cordi A, Poupin P, Bauda P, Billard P. 2010. Characterization of the ars gene cluster from extremely arsenic-resistant Microbacterium sp. strain A33. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:948–955. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01738-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Fernandez M, Udaondo Z, Niqui JL, Duque E, Ramos JL. 2014. Synergic role of the two ars operons in arsenic tolerance in Pseudomonas putida KT2440. Environ Microbiol Rep 6:483–489. doi: 10.1111/1758-2229.12167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hery M, Gault AG, Rowland HAL, Lear G, Polya DA, Lloyd JR. 2008. Molecular and cultivation-dependent analysis of metal-reducing bacteria implicated in arsenic mobilisation in South-east Asian aquifers. Appl Geochem 23:3215–3223. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.07.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Qin J, Rosen BP, Zhang Y, Wang G, Franke S, Rensing C. 2006. Arsenic detoxification and evolution of trimethylarsine gas by a microbial arsenite S-adenosylmethionine methyltransferase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:2075–2080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506836103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Carlin A, Shi WP, Dey S, Rosen BP. 1995. The ars operon of Escherichia coli confers arsenical and antimonial resistance. J Bacteriol 177:981–986. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.4.981-986.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Wysocki R, Bobrowicz P, Ulaszewski S. 1997. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae ACR3 gene encodes a putative membrane protein involved in arsenite transport. J Biol Chem 272:30061–30066. doi: 10.1074/jbc.272.48.30061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Aaltonen EK, Silow M. 2008. Transmembrane topology of the Acr3 family arsenite transporter from Bacillus subtilis. Biochim Biophys Acta 1778:963–973. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamem.2007.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Fu HL, Meng Y, Ordonez E, Villadangos AF, Bhattacharjee H, Gil JA, Mateos LM, Rosen BP. 2009. Properties of arsenite efflux permeases (Acr3) from Alkaliphilus metalliredigens and Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Biol Chem 284:19887–19895. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.011882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ji G, Silver S. 1992. Reduction of arsenate to arsenite by the ArsC protein of the arsenic resistance operon of Staphylococcus aureus plasmid pI258. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 89:9474–9478. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.20.9474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Butcher BG, Deane SM, Rawlings DE. 2000. The chromosomal arsenic resistance genes of Thiobacillus ferrooxidans have an unusual arrangement and confer increased arsenic and antimony resistance to Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:1826–1833. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.5.1826-1833.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Messens J, Van Molle I, Vanhaesebrouck P, Limbourg M, Van Belle K, Wahni K, Martins JC, Loris R, Wyns L. 2004. How thioredoxin can reduce a buried disulphide bond. J Mol Biol 339:527–537. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.04.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McInerney MJ, Struchtemeyer CG, Sieber J, Mouttaki H, Stams AJ, Schink B, Rohlin L, Gunsalus RP. 2008. Physiology, ecology, phylogeny, and genomics of microorganisms capable of syntrophic metabolism. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1125:58–72. doi: 10.1196/annals.1419.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Klein M, Friedrich M, Roger AJ, Hugenholtz P, Fishbain S, Abicht H, Blackall LL, Stahl DA, Wagner M. 2001. Multiple lateral transfers of dissimilatory sulfite reductase genes between major lineages of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes. J Bacteriol 183:6028–6035. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.20.6028-6035.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Friedrich MW. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis reveals multiple lateral transfers of adenosine-5′-phosphosulfate reductase genes among sulfate-reducing microorganisms. J Bacteriol 184:278–289. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.1.278-289.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zverlov V, Klein M, Lucker S, Friedrich MW, Kellermann J, Stahl DA, Loy A, Wagner M. 2005. Lateral gene transfer of dissimilatory (bi)sulfite reductase revisited. J Bacteriol 187:2203–2208. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.6.2203-2208.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Shi W, Wu J, Rosen BP. 1994. Identification of a putative metal binding site in a new family of metalloregulatory proteins. J Biol Chem 269:19826–19829. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Dong H, Nilsson L, Kurland CG. 1995. Gratuitous overexpression of genes in Escherichia coli leads to growth inhibition and ribosome destruction. J Bacteriol 177:1497–1504. doi: 10.1128/jb.177.6.1497-1504.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Coppi MV, Leang C, Sandler SJ, Lovley DR. 2001. Development of a genetic system for Geobacter sulfurreducens. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:3180–3187. doi: 10.1128/AEM.67.7.3180-3187.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Smith AH, Lingas EO, Rahman M. 2000. Contamination of drinking-water by arsenic in Bangladesh: a public health emergency. Bull World Health Organ 78:1093–1103. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.van Geen A, Rose J, Thoral S, Garnier J, Zheng Y, Bottero J. 2004. Decoupling of As and Fe release to Bangladesh groundwater under reducing conditions. Part II. Evidence from sediment incubations. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 68:3475–3486. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.01.026. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Lovley DR, Phillips EJ. 1988. Novel mode of microbial energy metabolism: organic carbon oxidation coupled to dissimilatory reduction of iron or manganese. Appl Environ Microbiol 54:1472–1480. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Anderson RT, Vrionis HA, Ortiz-Bernad I, Resch CT, Long PE, Dayvault R, Karp K, Marutzky S, Metzler DR, Peacock A, White DC, Lowe M, Lovley DR. 2003. Stimulating the in situ activity of Geobacter species to remove uranium from the groundwater of a uranium-contaminated aquifer. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5884–5891. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.10.5884-5891.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Hobbie JE, Daley RJ, Jasper S. 1977. Use of Nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy. Appl Environ Microbiol 33:1225–1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ausubel FM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Seidman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K. 2001. Current protocols in molecular biology, vol 3 John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken, NJ. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Aklujkar M, Lovley DR. 2010. Interference with histidyl-tRNA synthetase by a CRISPR spacer sequence as a factor in the evolution of Pelobacter carbinolicus. BMC Evol Biol 10:230. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-10-230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Marx CJ, Lidstrom ME. 2001. Development of improved versatile broad-host-range vectors for use in methylotrophs and other Gram-negative bacteria. Microbiology 147:2065–2075. doi: 10.1099/00221287-147-8-2065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.




