Skip to main content
Spinal Cord Series and Cases logoLink to Spinal Cord Series and Cases
. 2017 Feb 2;3:16039. doi: 10.1038/scsandc.2016.39

Paraplegia and transtibial amputation: successful ambulation after dual disability: a retrospective case report

Thangavelu Senthilvelkumar 1,*, Bobeena R Chandy 2
PMCID: PMC5289063  PMID: 28382211

Abstract

Introduction:

This is a single-subject case report. The objective is to describe the unique rehabilitation outcome of an individual with motor complete T12 paraplegia and a right transtibial amputation. This study was conducted at the Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation of Christian Medical College in India.

Case presentation:

A 42-year-old policeman presented to our rehabilitation centre with motor complete T12 paraplegia and right transtibial amputation, 3 months following a road traffic accident. As the patient’s goal was to walk, he was given a trial of independent ambulation with a customized prosthesis on the right side and a regular knee ankle foot orthosis (KAFO) on the left side.

Discussion:

At the end of 12 weeks of rehabilitation, the patient was able to walk independently with the prosthesis/orthosis and bilateral elbow crutches. His Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) score improved from 0/20 to 12/20 points. The scope of functional ambulation should not get restricted for a person with low thoracic spinal cord injury even when there is concurrent transtibial amputation.

Subject terms: Health care, Quality of life

Introduction

A combination of paraplegia and amputation following road traffic accidents causes dual disability making the rehabilitation process complex. Treatment and rehabilitation needs to address both the orthopedic and neurological impairments.

Case presentation

We report a case of a 42-year-old policeman who presented to our rehabilitation centre with motor complete T12 paraplegia and right transtibial amputation, 3 months following a road traffic accident. He sustained a T12 vertebral fracture and a grade III C comminuted fracture of the middle one-third of his right tibia and fibula. His leg was not salvageable so he underwent a right below knee amputation on the same day. The following day he underwent spinal surgery with decompression and segmental instrumentation. He also suffered a fracture of the right scapular neck, left inferior pubic ramus, right ileum and left fourth rib. These were all managed conservatively.

Neurological examination revealed paralysis below T12 level with no sensory or motor preservation. He had an AIS A injury (AIS: American Spinal Injury Association Impairment scale) according to the International Standards for the Neurological Classification of spinal cord injury. The residual right limb had adequate stump length and was conical shaped. The surgical scar healed well with no painful neuromas or any other complications. There were no other co-morbid conditions.

The patient’s initial rehabilitation goals were to gain independence with transfers, bed mobility and wheelchair propulsion. He achieved all these goals reasonably quickly and within 4 weeks. The patient also expressed a strong desire to walk for at least short distances so he could go back to his vocation as a policeman even if he was restricted to desk duties. Therefore, he was fitted with a customized patella tendon bearing (PTB) prosthesis with extended uprights similar to a knee ankle foot orthosis (KAFO). The prosthesis incorporated a standard polypropylene PTB socket and a soft ethaflex liner with a SACH foot (Dynamic Solid Ankle Cushion). Aluminium uprights with drop locks at the knee joint were attached to either side of the PTB prosthesis. The uprights had a thigh band posteriorly below the ischium and a supracondylar band anteriorly for knee support similar to the knee cap of a regular KAFO (see Figure 1). The left lower limb was fitted with a standard KAFO made of polypropylene. Both ankles were set in ten degrees of dorsiflexion to allow for hyperextension at the hip and hence better stability in standing.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Shows the prosthetic design used for the patient.

The patient received 12 weeks of intensive gait training following our institute’s protocol for gait training with bilateral KAFOs in people with low thoracic SCI (Table 1). Gait training was initiated within the parallel bars and then progressed to outside the parallel bars with a walker and then elbow crutches. The patient was taught to walk with a reciprocal gait pattern. The skin of both lower limbs was regularly checked for chaffing and excessive pressure. At the end of 12 weeks, the patient was able to walk a distance of 200 m at the speed of 5 m min−1 using a left KAFO and right modified prosthesis with the aid of bilateral elbow crutches. He achieved a WISCI score of 12/20 points. In addition, he was able to perform a standing pivot transfer and was independent in all functional activities from a wheelchair. He was discharged 16 weeks after commencing rehabilitation.

Table 1. Shows the 12 weeks rehabilitation course of the patient.

Rehabilitation protocol
Phase 1 (Week 0–6)
 Goals
  Muscle strengthening of the entire upper limb with special emphasis on crutch muscles
  Achieve independent standing balance using sway back posture
  Improve standing endurance
  Improve physical and cardiovascular endurance
  Retrain walking using compensatory leg clearance technique (hip hitching)
  Achieve ambulation with reciprocal walker
  Transfer skills using walker
 Week 1 and 2
  Strengthening program of key muscles of upper extremity (Biceps, triceps, latissimus dorsi, pectoralis, wrist extension)
  Functional abilities training in plinth
  Taught donning and doffing of Knee Ankle Foot Orthoses (KAFO)
  Standing inside parallel bar using right BK prosthesis with extended uprights and left KAFO
  Standing balance training using sway back position aided by 10° of dorsiflexion at ankle (anti-jack knifing)
  Foot clearance trained by depressing shoulder to approximate pelvis (hitching)
  Ambulation inside parallel bar using reciprocal four-point gait
 Week 3 and 4
  Ambulation—continued
  Direct transfers using walker and appliances
  Functional abilities training in plinth—continued
  Upper limb strengthening—continued
 Week 5 and 6
  After 100 m of walking endurance in bar, ambulation progressed using a reciprocal walker
  Upper limb strengthening—continued
  Balance training with elbow crutches
  Initiation of ambulation using bilateral elbow crutches
 
Phase II (Week 7–12)
 Goals
  Improve standing endurance with crutches
  Progress ambulation with elbow crutches using reciprocal gait pattern
  Negotiation of curbs and rough terrain
  Work on walking speed and endurance
  Improve physical and cardiovascular endurance
 Week 7 and 8
  Upper limb strengthening—continued
  Progression of ambulation with elbow crutches
  Progressed to independent walking
  Direct and pivot transfers using elbow crutches
 Week 9 and 10
  Walking endurance with elbow crutches
  Upper limb strengthening—continued
  Gait training—swing to pattern
 Week 11 and 12
  Walking endurance in different walking surfaces
  Gait achieved with the speed of 5 m min−1 and 200 m of endurance

The patient was reviewed via telephone 6 months post discharge. He reported being in good health and independent in all activities of daily living. He was continuing to walk with his left KAFO and right modified prosthesis without any notable complications of the residual limb. He had returned to work as a policeman but on desk duties.

Discussion

People with paraplegia and a lower limb amputation are typically provided with a wheelchair for mobility. However, in this case study we demonstrate that it is possible for these individuals to learn to walk with a prosthesis and orthosis. There are only a few studies reporting the rehabilitation of people with paraplegia and lower limb amputations.1–3 The authors of these studies found that patients did not achieve the expected functional outcome given their level of spinal cord injury. Herman et al.1 reported a person with T12 paraplegia and transfemoral amputation learning to walk, but only for exercise purposes. A study by Wang and Hong3 reported the outcomes of 6 people with paraplegia and lower limb amputations. They claimed that all six people learnt to walk in a way that would be expected by their spinal cord injuries but no details or gait outcomes measures were provided. A third case study by Mustafa et al.4 reported successfully fitting a person with incomplete paraplegia with a prosthesis for ambulation. To the best of our knowledge, there are no other similar reports of people with complete paraplegia and lower limb amputation achieving independent ambulation.

The main challenges in teaching our patient to walk were related to his anaesthetic amputated limb. He was highly vulnerable to pressure ulcers because of his lack of sensation and the pressure associated with the total contact socket and the self suspension system (moulding over the patellar tendon and tibial condyles). Ohry et al.5 states that fitting an insensate limb with a prosthesis is contra-indicated. However, Shin et al.2 says that the possibility of fitting a prosthesis to an insensate limb should not be dismissed, and that a trial of prosthetic fitting for the insensate limb and training is appropriate if the patient has the potential for ambulation. We avoided pressure ulcers by including a soft lining within the socket, and closely monitoring the patient’s skin for deterioration.

Prosthetic fitting in a transtibial (below knee) amputee with paraplegia is more challenging than a transfemoral amputee because of the need for uprights to lock the knee joint while walking. This requires customization of the prosthesis. Therefore, even though a transtibial amputation has less structural loss, the prosthetic challenge is more than for a transfemoral prosthesis which already has a knee component that can be locked. The knee uprights require drop-locks to ease the process of donning and doffing the KAFO independently and also to allow flexion of the knees while sitting.

In low- and middle-income countries like India where wheelchair accessibility in the community is a major hurdle, we have found that walking with orthoses gives individuals a better chance of community reintegration.6–8 The ability to walk increases a person’s chances of employment because there are fewer architectural barriers. This was evident in our case study. The patient was able to return to work as a policeman (albeit on desk duties) because he was able to walk. It is for this reason that walking with orthoses and aids is a common goal for people with low thoracic paraplegia in low- and middle-income countries.

The patient reported in this case study had a good outcome because he was highly motivated and keen to move on with his life. Sometimes people with SCI lose motivation because they struggle to come to terms with their altered body image.9 This can be particularly problematic for a person with spinal cord injury and lower limb amputation.10,11 Typically, people go through a phase of difficulty in acceptance and reconciliation with their condition. This can interfere with their ability to achieve even basic rehabilitation goals.

In conclusion, the scope of functional ambulation should not get restricted for a person with low thoracic spinal cord injury even when there is concurrent transtibial amputation.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr George Tharion, Professor, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Christian Medical College for oversight and the rehabilitation team for support extended to this project. We also extend our sincere thanks to the prosthetic and orthotic team for their immense work in customizing the prosthesis.

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Herman T, David Y, Ohry A. Prosthetic fitting and ambulation in a paraplegic patient with an above-knee amputation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995; 76: 290–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Shin JC, Park C, Kim DY, Choi YS, Kim YK, Seong YJ. Prosthetic ambulation in a paraplegic patient with a transfemoral amputation and radial nerve palsy. Yonsei Med J 2000; 41: 512–516. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Wang F, Hong Y. Rehabilitation for patients with paraplegia and lower extremity amputation. J Phys Ther Sci 2015; 27: 3049–3051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mustafah NM, Bakar NA, Yang CT. Prosthetic restoration in patient with incomplete spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord Ser Cases 2016; 1: 15031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ohry A, Heim M, Steinbach TV, Rozin R. The needs and unique problems facing spinal cord injured persons after limb amputation. Paraplegia 1983; 21: 260–263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Senthilvelkumar T, Raji T. Gutter crutches: an unconventional walking aid for incomplete tetraplegics. IJPMR 2013; 24: 76–79. [Google Scholar]
  7. Samuelkamaleshkumar S, Radhika S, Cherian B, Elango A, Winrose W, Suhany BT et al. Community reintegration in rehabilitated South Indian persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2010; 91: 1117–1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sekaran P, Vijayakumari F, Hariharan R, Zachariah K, Joseph SE, Kumar RKS. Community reintegration of spinal cord-injured patients in rural south India. Spinal Cord 2010; 48: 628–632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Fuentes CT, Pazzaglia M, Longo MR, Scivoletto G, Haggard P. Body image distortions following spinal cord injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2013; 84: 201–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Yetzer EA, Schandler S, Root TL, Turnbaugh K. Self-concept and body image in persons who are spinal cord injured with and without lower limb amputation. SCI Nurs Publ Am Assoc Spinal Cord Inj Nurses 2003; 20: 18–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Recio AC. Transfemoral Amputation Following Chronic Spinal Cord Injury: A Prosthetic Solution for Improved Balance, Seating, Dynamic Function and Body Image. J Spine 2015; 04: 195. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Spinal Cord Series and Cases are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES