Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2017 Feb 3;7:41875. doi: 10.1038/srep41875

Association of VAV2 and VAV3 polymorphisms with cardiovascular risk factors

Nuria Perretta-Tejedor 1,2,3, Javier Fernández-Mateos 3,4, Luis García-Ortiz 1,3,5, Manuel A Gómez-Marcos 1,3,5, José I Recio-Rodríguez 1,3,5, Cristina Agudo-Conde 1,3,5, Emiliano Rodriguez-Sánchez 3,5, Ana I Morales 1,3, Francisco J López-Hernández 1,2,3, José M López-Novoa 3,6, Rogelio González-Sarmiento 3,4, Carlos Martínez-Salgado 1,2,3,a
PMCID: PMC5291103  PMID: 28157227

Abstract

Hypertension, diabetes and obesity are cardiovascular risk factors closely associated to the development of renal and cardiovascular target organ damage. VAV2 and VAV3, members of the VAV family proto-oncogenes, are guanosine nucleotide exchange factors for the Rho and Rac GTPase family, which is related with cardiovascular homeostasis. We have analyzed the relationship between the presence of VAV2 rs602990 and VAV3 rs7528153 polymorphisms with cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage (heart, vessels and kidney) in 411 subjects. Our results show that being carrier of the T allele in VAV2 rs602990 polymorphism is associated with an increased risk of obesity, reduced levels of ankle-brachial index and diastolic blood pressure and reduced retinal artery caliber. In addition, being carrier of T allele is associated with increased risk of target organ damage in males. On the other hand, being carrier of the T allele in VAV3 rs7528153 polymorphism is associated with a decreased susceptibility of developing a pathologic state composed by the presence of hypertension, diabetes, obesity or cardiovascular damage, and with an increased risk of developing altered basal glycaemia. This is the first report showing an association between VAV2 and VAV3 polymorphisms with cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage.


Hypertension (HT), diabetes mellitus (DM) and obesity are the most common risk factors associated to the development of cardiovascular diseases1,2, the main cause of death worldwide3. HT is directly related to the incidence of cardiovascular complications (heart attack, ictus or peripheral arterial disease). Moreover, high blood pressure (BP) or DM together with other risk factor maximize their cardiovascular risk1. The presence of renal4, cardiac5 and vascular6,7 target organ damage (TOD) also increases cardiovascular risk8. Vascular damage affects large and small vessels: Damage in large vessels is associated with atherosclerosis whereas damage in small vessels (narrowing or blocked retinal blood vessels, macular edema) appears in disorders such as retinopathy, as reported in some studies which associate retinal vessels caliber with arterial hypertension9, left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)10, metabolic syndrome11, cerebrovascular accident12 and coronary diseases13 and cardiovascular risk.

The guanine nucleotide exchange factors VAV2 and VAV3 are members of the VAV family of proto-oncogenes. Both are GDP-GTP dependent factors that stimulate Rho and Rac GTPases14, which have a similar structure, leading to the activation of intracellular pathways involved in cytoskeletal organization, transcriptomal dynamics and other biological responses15. VAV proteins are expressed in a variety of tissues14,16 and in hematopoietic cells17 and participate in the development and function of hematopoietic lineage cells, lymphocytes, neutrophils, natural killers and osteoclasts15,18,19. All VAV family members contains an N-terminal calponin homology (CH) domain, a catalytic Dbl-homology (DH) domain, an acidic (Ac) region, a pleckstrin-homology (PH) region, a C1 subtype zinc finger (ZF) domain, a SH2 and a C-terminal SH3 (CSH3), a proline-rich region (PRR) and a more N-terminally-located SH3 (NSH3)14.

Sauzeau et al.20 analysed the effects of the absence of VAV2 in knock-out mice, which showed cardiovascular alterations such as cardiovascular remodeling, thickening of aorta media walls and LVH with fibrosis. In addition, these mice showed renal fibrosis, tachycardia and HT due to hyperstimulation of the renin/angiotensin/aldosterone axis and sympathetic nervous system20. They also observed a similar phenotype in VAV3−/− mice (cardiovascular remodeling, HT, tachycardia, kidney and heart fibrosis)21, thus suggesting that both VAV2 and VAV3 play a key role in cardiovascular homeostasis20,21. On the other hand, Menacho-Marquez et al.22 have related VAV3 with the metabolic syndrome and obesity, as VAV3−/− mice fed with chow diet developed metabolic syndrome, whereas these mice fed under fatty diets showed resistance against obesity and metabolic syndrome22.

Although several studies have observed that some single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VAV genes are related to pathologies such as schizophrenia (VAV3 rs1410403)23, hypothyroidism (VAV3 rs4915077)24 and candidate genes for spontaneous glaucoma (VAV2 rs2156323 and VAV3 rs2801219)25- albeit later studies seem to rule out this involvement26, there are not studies relating VAV polymorphisms with cardiovascular risk. Thus, our aim is to analyze the relationship between VAV2 (rs602990) and VAV3 (rs7528153) polymorphisms with cardiovascular risk factors and TOD (heart, vessels and kidney) in a Spanish population8.

Results

We analyzed 411 subjects. Tables 1 and 2 summarize clinical, demographic and physical variables of the subjects under the study. The distribution of genotypes of VAV2 rs602990 and VAV3 rs7528153 polymorphisms in control samples are in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (Table 3).

Table 1. Characteristics of the 411 patients included in the study.

  N %
Sex
 Female 192 47.2
 Male 215 52.1
HT
 Yes 209 50.9
 No 202 49.1
Diabetes Mellitus
 Yes 66 83.5
 No 345 16.0
Pathologic state
 Yes 281 31.5
 No 130 68.0
Target organ damage
 Yes 191 46.2
 No 220 53.3
Altered basal glycaemia
 Yes 51 12.3
 No 360 87.2
BMI
 BMI < 25 74 17.9
 BMI 25–30 210 50.8
 BMI > 30 127 30.8
Dyslipidemia
 Yes 386 93.5
 No 24 5.8
Elevated PP
 Yes 97 23.5
 No 314 76.0
LVH
 Yes 34 8.2
 No 367 88.9
C-IMT
 Yes 73 17.7
 No 336 81.4
Altered PWV
 Yes 63 15.3
 No 343 83.1
PAD
 Yes 7 1.7
 No 402 98.3
CV risk
 <1% 58 14.1
 1–5% 198 48.2
 5–10% 84 20.4
 >10% 71 17.3
Antihypertensive drugs
 Yes 227 55.0
 No 184 44.6
Antidiabetic drugs
 Yes 66 16.0
 No 345 83.5
Lipid-lowering drugs
 Yes 164 39.7
 No 247 59.8

BMI: body mass index; C-IMT: carotid intima media thickness; CV: cardiovascular; HT: hypertension; LVH: left ventricular hypertrophy; PAD: peripheral arterial disease; PP: pulse pressure; PWV: pulse wave velocity.

Table 2. Demographic, physical and basic analytical values of the patients included in the study.

Characteristics N Average SD
Weight. Kg 411 76.49 14.57
Age. years 411 60.31 9.79
BMI. Kg/m2 411 28.54 4.38
SBP. mmHg 411 133.84 17.18
DBP. mmHg 411 81.31 10.54
PP. mmHg 411 52.53 13.03
Heart rate. beats/min 411 70.11 10.97
ABI left 411 1.14 0.10
ABI right 410 1.13 0.10
Average C-IMT. mm 409 0.74 0.10
Maximun C-IMT. mm 409 0.90 0.12
PWV. m/s 406 8.64 1.61
VDP-Cornell. mV/ms 401 1548.23 565.01
Basal glycemia. mg/dL 411 95.60 28.10
Plasma creatinine. mg/dL 411 0.85 0.19
HDL-cholesterol. mg/dL 398 53.64 14.20
LDL- colesterol. mg/dL 403 132.09 34.32
Triglycerides. mg/dL 411 128.63 73.79
HbA1c. % 402 5.92 0.92
Hemoglobin. g/dL 407 15.09 1.17
Urinary creatinine. mg/dL 404 103.95 52.48
Microalbuminuria. mg/dL 403 13.14 65.61
Left artery. μm 229 108.08 13.31
Right artery. μm 234 109.04 12.57
Average artery. μm 261 109.16 12.13
Minor artery. μm 261 104.83 13.09
Left vein. μm 229 141.42 19.07
Right vein. μm 234 142.18 18.90
Average vein. μm 261 142.29 17.89
Major vein. μm 261 147.54 17.88
Left AVIx. μm 190 0.79 0.11
Right AVIx. μm 175 0.78 0.11
Average AVIx. μm 259 0.78 0.08

ABI = ankle brachial index; AVIx = arteriovenous index; BMI = body mass index; C- IMT = carotid intima media thickness; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; HbA1c = glycosylated hemoglobin; HDL = high-density lipoprotein; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; PP = pulse pressure; PWV = pulse wave velocity; SBP = systolic blood pressure; SD = standar deviation; VDP = voltage duration product. Artery, vein and AVIx values are retinal vessels.

Table 3. Characteristics of the VAV2 and VAV3 polymorphisms.

Gene SNP ID Base Change SNP Chr location Assay ID HWE
VAV2 rs602990 1780 T > C p.Val594Met 9q34.1 C_2537403_10 >0.05
VAV3 rs7528153 c.892 T > A Ser298Thr 1 C_447698_10 >0.05

Chr: chromosome; HWE: Hardy Weinberg equilibrium in control groups; SNP: single nucleotide polymorphism.

There are statistically significant differences in the genotypic distribution for VAV2 rs602990 or VAV3 rs7538153 polymorphisms in cardiovascular risk parameters such as the presence of cardiovascular risk factors, TOD, altered basal glycaemia or obesity.

On the one hand, there are statistically significant differences in the VAV3 rs7538153 genotypic distribution between the patients group (n = 281) and controls (n = 130). Being carrier of the T allele is associated with a decreased susceptibility of developing hypertension, diabetes, obesity or cardiovascular damage in the dominant model (Table 4). There are also significant differences in the genotypic distribution for VAV3 rs7538153 SNP between patients with (n = 51) and without altered basal glycaemia (n = 360). Being carrier of the T allele confers an increased risk of developing altered basal glycaemia in the recessive model (Table 5).

Table 4. Distribution of VAV3 rs7528153 genotypes among patients with or without pathological state.

SNP Genotype Pathological
Non pathological
P value OR (95% CI)
N % N %
VAV3 rs7528153 AA 144 53.9 47 38.5 Ref. 1.000
AT 94 35.2 62 50.8 0.002 0.484 (0.304–0.770)
TT 29 10.9 13 10.7 0.390 0.724 (0.346–1.514)
VAV3 rs7528153 dominant AA 144 53.9 47 38.5 Ref. 1.000
AT + TT 123 46.1 75 61.5 0.004 0.526 (0.338–0.817)
VAV3 rs7528153 recessive AA + AT 238 89.1 109 89.3 Ref. 1.000
TT 29 10.9 13 10.7 0.945 0.526 (0.338–0.817)

P value & OR adjusted by sex and age. CI = confidence interval; OR = odd ratio; ref. = reference; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

Table 5. Distribution of VAV3 rs7528153 genotypes among patients with or without altered basal glycaemia.

SNP Genotype Altered basal glycaemia P value OR (95% CI)
Yes
No
N % N %
VAV3 rs7528153 AA 24 49.0 167 49.1 Ref. 1.000
AT 15 30.6 141 41.5 0.362 0.727 (0.367–1.442)
TT 10 20.4 32 9.4 0.068 2.169 (0.944–4.985)
VAV3 rs7528153 dominant AA 24 49.0 167 49.1 Ref. 1.000
AT + TT 25 51.0 173 50.9 0.977 0.991 (0.543–1.807)
VAV3 rs7528153 recessive AA + AT 39 79.6 308 90.6 Ref. 1.000
TT 10 20.4 32 9.4 0.024 2.481 (1.129–5.453)

P value & OR adjusted by sex and age. CI = confidence interval; OR = odd ratio; ref. = reference; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

On the other hand, there are statistically significant differences in the allelic distribution for VAV2 rs602990 polymorphism between males with TOD (n = 107) and controls (n = 93). Being carrier of the T allele is associated with an increased risk of TOD in the dominant model (Table 6). There are also differences in VAV2 rs602990 SNP genotypic distribution between obese (BMI > 30) (n = 123) and non-obese (BMI 25–30) patients (n = 197) in the recessive model, where being carrier of the T allele is associated with an increased risk of obesity (Table 7) and a decreased average and minor retinal artery caliber (Table 8). Being carrier of the T allele in this SNP is also associated with low levels of DBP and low levels of right ABI (Table 8).

Table 6. Distribution of VAV2 rs602990 genotypes among male patients with and without target organ damage.

SNP Genotype Target organ damage P value OR (95% CI)
Yes
No
N % N %
VAV2 rs602990 CC 19 17.8 31 33.3 Ref. 1.000
CT 63 58.9 40 43.0 0.026 2.253 (1.101–4.613)
TT 25 23.4 22 23.7 0.298 1.559 (0.675–3.598)
VAV2 rs602990 dominant CC 19 17.8 31 33.3 Ref. 1.000
CT + TT 88 82.2 62 66.7 0.044 2.007 (1.018–3.956)
VAV2 rs602990 recessive CC + CT 82 76.6 71 76.3 Ref. 1.000
TT 25 23.4 22 23.7 0.746 0.894 (0.454–1.760)

P value & OR adjusted by sex and age. CI = confidence interval; OR = odd ratio; ref. = reference; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

Table 7. Distribution of VAV2 rs602990 genotypes among obese (BMI > 30) and non-obese (BMI 25–30) patients.

SNP Genotype Obesity P value OR (95% CI)
Yes
No
N % N %
               
VAV2 rs602990 CC 31 25.6 54 27.4 Ref. 1.000
CT 52 43.0 102 51.8 0.814 0.935 (0.533–1.639)
TT 38 31.4 41 20.8 0.109 1.679 (0.890–3.165)
VAV2 rs602990 dominant CC 31 25.6 54 27.4 Ref. 1.000
CT + TT 90 74.4 143 72.6 0.603 1.149 (0.682–1.936)
VAV2 rs602990 recessive CC + CT 83 68.6 156 79.2 Ref. 1.000
TT 38 31.4 41 20.8 0.036 1.753 (1.038–2.958)

P value & OR adjusted by sex and age. CI = confidence interval; OR = odd ratio; ref. = reference; SNP = single nucleotide polymorphism.

Table 8. Statistically significant results in the distribution of VAV2 rs602990 according to different cardiovascular characteristics measured on the patients.

Characteristic VAV2 average ± SD
P value
VAV2 dominant average ± SD
P value VAV2 recessive average ± SD
P value
CC CT TT CCvsTT CCvsCT CTvsTT CC CT + TT CC + CT TT
DBP 83.01 ± 9.91 81.34 ± 10.73 79.28 ± 10.89 0.051 0.567 0.482 83.01 ± 9.91 80.61 ± 10.81 0.064 81.92 ± 0.61 79.28 ± 1.03 0.045
ABI right 1.13 ± 0.10 1.14 ± 0.09 1.11 ± 0.11 0.419 1.000 0.058 1.13 ± 0.10 1.13 ± 0.10 0.782 1.14 ± 0.10 1.11 ± 0.11 0.043
Retinal artery average 108.76 ± 11.07 111.19 ± 12.26 106.45 ± 13.43 0.988 0.454 0.035 108.76 ± 11.07 109.56 ± 12.39 0.609 110.33 ± 11.88 106.45 ± 13.43 0.028
Retinal artery minor 104.62 ± 11.14 106.74 ± 13.82 102.16 ± 14.18 1.000 0.747 0.076 104.62 ± 11.14 105.17 ± 14.08 0.733 105.99 ± 12.95 102.17 ± 14.18 0.043

P value adjusted by age and sex. All data are corrected by Bonferroni post-hoc test. ABI = ankle-brachial index; DBP =diastolic blood pressure; SD = standard deviation.

Discussion

Some polymorphic variants of genes involved in cardiovascular regulation seem to influence the risk or predisposition to developing cardiovascular disease. For example, a nitric oxide synthase 3 (NOS3) polymorphism is related to rapid progression of heart failure in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy27. Moreover, polymorphic variants of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) gene are associated with coronary artery disease28. On the other hand, a paraoxonase 1 polymorphism is related with low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and with the risk of premature myocardial infarction, whereas another polymorphism of the same gene is associated with a positive family history of coronary artery disease29. Polymorphisms in angiotensinogen, angiotensin converting enzyme, angiotensin II type I receptor and aldosterone synthase, as well as polymorphisms in paraoxonase 2, NOS3 endothelin-1 and α and β-adrenergic receptors, are related to essential hypertension, myocardial stiffness and infarction, heart failure, coronary artery atherosclerosis, idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and left ventricle hypertrophy30.

Our study shows an association between VAV2 rs602990 and VAV3 rs7528153 polymorphisms with several cardiovascular risk factors and TOD (heart, vessels and kidney) in a Spanish population. Hypertension, diabetes and obesity are the most common cardiovascular risk factors1,2, closely associated to the development of cardiovascular diseases, inducing renal and cardiovascular TOD1,8. VAV genes have been related with cardiovascular homeostasis20,21. Moreover, SNPs in VAV genes have been related with several diseases such as schizophrenia, hypothyroidism and glaucoma23,24,25. The SNP T298A VAV3 rs7528153 is located in the DH domain, which catalyzes the activation of Rho and Rac GTPases31. There is an association between this VAV3 rs7528153 polymorphism and the presence of a pathologic state by the presence of hypertension, diabetes, obesity or cardiovascular disease (or combinations thereof), as T allele carriers of this SNP have a decreased risk of developing this pathologic state. VAV3−/− mice show cardiovascular alterations such as hypertension, tachycardia or cardiovascular remodeling21 and metabolic syndrome22 due to a chronic sympathetic excitation. In the ventrolateral medulla, a brainstem area that modulates respiratory, sympathetic and cardiovascular activities32, VAV3 acts regulating the conduction of axons of GABAergic neurons from the caudal to the rostral region33. The lack of VAV3 confers a reduced GABAergic transmission between these two areas leading to chronic sympathetic excitation33 and a variety of sympathetic mediated defects (cardiovascular defects, hypertension or tachycardia). Therefore, it is known that VAV3 has an important role contributing to proper axon guidance33 that are under the control of Rho/Rac family proteins34. Thus, we suggest that the SNP in the DH domain (rs7538153) confers an increased catalytic activity of Rho/Rac proteins in the GABAergic neurons, which contributes to a proper axon guidance and therefore a correct sympathetic activation.

We have found an association between VAV3 rs7528153 polymorphisms and altered basal glycaemia. Being carrier of the T allele is associated with increased risk of higher values of basal glycaemia. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) acts as an upstream signal for VAV3 induction involving metformin-mediated signaling. Loss of VAV3 potentiates metformin-mediated glucose uptake, suggesting that VAV3 could become a molecular target for blood glucose regulation through AMPK35. We suggest that this SNP may affect the metformin-mediated glucose uptake through AMPK. In addition, as VAV3 is down-regulated in human pancreas with type 2 diabetes compared to healthy pancreas, this polymorphic variant of VAV3 may contribute to less severe diabetic neurophaties36.

The SNP V594M VAV2 rs602990 is located in the first SH3 domain. We detected an association between VAV2 rs602990 polymorphisms and the presence of TOD. Being carrier of the T allele confers an increased risk of TOD in males (increased PP, HVI, IMT, PWV, ABI or microalbuminuria). Sauzeau et al. observed that VAV2−/− mice showed cardiovascular and renal alterations, such as remodeling in the cardiovascular system, LVH with fibrosis, interstitial renal fibrosis and lower glomerular filtration rate21 due to a chronic sympathetic excitation. In addition, double VAV2−/−, VAV3−/− and triple VAV1−/−, VAV2−/− and VAV3−/− mice showed defects in dendritic spine development, in axon transmission and synaptic plasticity in cortical, renal and hippocampal neurons due to deregulation of Rac activity37,38. We suggest that this SNP in the SH3 domain (which have a great affinity for proline rich sequences and recognize proteins in specific cell regions14) reduces the catalytic activity of VAV2 (regulating Rac) in cortical, retinal an hippocampal neurons. Therefore, it produces a defect in axon guidance, which implicates a chronic sympathetic excitation as well as cardiovascular and renal alterations.

ABI index is an indicative parameter of peripheral arterial disease and a low ABI index is directly related with vascular damage1. According with our data, T allele in VAV2 rs602990 polymorphism is associated with low levels of right ABI, and therefore is associated with an increased risk of vascular damage. Moreover, T allele in VAV2 rs602990 polymorphisms is also associated with an increased risk of obesity. On the other hand, the T allele in this VAV2 SNP is associated with reduced retinal artery caliber. Retinal arterial narrowing is associated with retinal damage such as retinopathy. Several studies found a relationship between retinal vessels caliber with LVH10, metabolic syndrome11, cerebrovascular accidents12 and coronary diseases13.

Although Sauzeau et al. observed that VAV2−/− mice were hypertensive due to sympathetic excitation, some studies reported that Rac1 is involved in vasoconstriction39. Overexpression of Rac1 in smooth muscle cells in mice induces hypertension as it regulates the redox state of the blood vessels and blood pressure homeostasis through the NADPH oxidase pathway40. VAV2 is a guanosine nucleotide exchange factor which activates Rac1 in many cell types41,18. In our study, we found that being carrier of the T allele in VAV2 rs602990 polymorphism is associated with lower levels of DBP, suggesting that this polymorphism confers less catalytic activity to VAV2, resulting in less activation of Rac 1 and therefore low DBP.

Overall, this study shows the association between some VAV2 and VAV3 polymorphisms with cardiovascular risk factors in a Spanish population. However, this study has some limitations. First, this is a retrospective study. Second, due to the number of analyzed patients, there is a limitation in the statistical power of the study. Thus, in order to confirm our results, studies should be done in a larger population.

In conclusion, this is the first study showing the association between VAV2 and VAV3 polymorphisms with cardiovascular risk factors and TOD, possibly through their influence in Rho and Rac pathways. These polymorphisms are associated with indicators frequently used in the clinical practice to evaluate cardiovascular damage (ABI, retinal artery thickness, DBP, basal glucose and integrated cardiovascular pathologic state). Thus, our study suggests that the analysis of VAV2 and VAV3 polymorphisms might be a useful diagnostic and prognostic marker of susceptibility to cardiovascular damage.

Methods

This is a cross-sectional study performed in patients with or without DM and HT. 411 subjects aged between 20–80 years were recruited in the Primary Care Research Unit of La Alamedilla Health Centre, Salamanca (Spain), covering a population of 46,000 inhabitants. HT was diagnosed when the mean of three different BP measurements was ≥120 mm Hg for systolic blood pressure (SBP) or ≥80 mm Hg for diastolic blood pressure (DBP) or when patients received antihypertensive drugs. DM was diagnosed following 2 criteria: basal plasma glucose ≥126 mg/dL, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) > 6,5% or when patients received antidiabetic drugs. Obesity was diagnosed by body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m21. Dyslipidemia was considered when total cholesterol >4.9 mmol/L (190 mg/dL) or low density lipoprotein cholesterol >3 mmol/L (115 mg/dL) or high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: men <1.0 mmol/L (40 mg/dL), women <1.2 mmol/L (46 mg/dL) or triglycerides >1.7 mmol/L (150 mg/dL). In this study we consider pathologic state when there is a diagnostic of HT, DM, obesity or cardiovascular disease (ischaemic stroke or cerebrovascular disease). Exclusion criteria: patients unable to comply with the protocol requirement (psychological and/or cognitive disorders, failure to cooperate, educational limitations and problems in understanding written language, and failure to sign the informed consent document), patients participating in a clinical trial or patients with serious comorbidities. Normotensive and normoglycemic patients with the above described exclusion criteria and without detectable renal and cardiovascular alterations were selected as controls.

TOD is a variable composed of renal TOD (assessed by microalbuminuria) vascular TOD (assessed by carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), pulse wave velocity (PWV) and ankle-brachial index (ABI)) and cardiac TOD (assessed by left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and pulse pressure (PP)).

Ethical and legal issues

The experimental protocol was in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (2008) of the World Medical Association, approved by the University Hospital of Salamanca Ethics Committee and complied with Spanish data protection law (LO 15/1999) and specifications (RD 1720/2007). An informed consent was obtained from all participants recruited in the study.

Anthropometric measurements

We calculated BMI (kg/m2) measuring body weight using a homologated electronic scale (Seca 70, Hamburg, Germany; precision ± 0.1 kg), and height with a portable system (Seca 222).

Plasma and urine determinations

We collected urine and blood samples in the morning after fasting for at least 8 hours. We measured creatinine, basal glucose, HbA1c, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol in plasma, and creatinine and microalbumin in urine using standard automatic techniques on a blind basis in the Biochemistry laboratory of the University Hospital, Salamanca (Spain).

Blood pressure determination

Office BP evaluation involved three measurements of SBP and DBP with a validated OMRON model M7 sphygmomanometer (Omron Health Care, Kyoto, Japan) following the recommendations of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH)1. We calculated SBP, DBP, and PP with the mean values of the second and third measurements.

Evaluation of peripheral artery disease

We used the ankle–brachial index (ABI), in patients refrained from drinking coffee or smoking tobacco for at least 8 h before measurements and at 22–24 °C. With the patient lying in supine position and with the feet uncovered, we measured BP in the lower limbs after resting for 20 min using a portable Doppler system Minidop Es-100Vx (Hadeco Inc, Miyamae-ku Kawasaki, Japan). We calculated ABI automatically for each foot by dividing the higher of the two SBP in the ankle by the higher of the two SBP in the arm. An ankle–brachial index <0.9 is considered abnormal1.

Determination of left ventricular hypertrophy

Electrocardiography (ECG) was performed with a General Electric MAC 3.500 ECG System (Niskayuna, New York, USA) that automatically measures wave voltage and duration and estimates the criteria of the Cornell voltage duration product (VDP)42 LVH was defined as a Sokolow-Lyon index >3.5 mV; RaVL >1.1 mV, Cornell VDP >244 mV*ms or RaVL >1.1 mV1.

Determination of pulse wave velocity

We evaluated PWV with the SphygmoCor System (AtCor Medical Pty Ltd, Head Office, West Ryde, Australia). We analyzed the pulse waves of the carotid and femoral arteries with the patient in the supine position measuring the delay with respect to the ECG wave, and then calculating PWV. We obtained distance measurements with a measuring tape from the sternal notch to the carotid and femoral arteries at the sensor location.

Assessment of carotid intima-media thickness

We used a Micromax ultrasound device (SonoSite Inc, Bothell, WA) paired with a 5–10 MHz multifrequency high-resolution linear transducer with Sonocal software for performing automated measurements of carotid IMT in order to optimise reproducibility. We made measurements of the common carotid after examination of a 10 mm longitudinal section at a distance of 1 cm from the bifurcation. We took measurements in the proximal wall, and in the distal wall in the lateral, anterior and posterior projections, following an axis perpendicular to the artery to discriminate two lines: one for the intima-blood interface and the other for the media-adventitious interface. We took six measurements of both the right and left carotid arteries, using average values (average carotid IMT) and maximum values (maximum carotid IMT) automatically calculated by the software43. Average IMT was considered abnormal if >0.90 mm or in the presence of atherosclerotic plaques with a diameter of 1.5 mm or a focal increase of 0.5 mm or 50% of the adjacent IMT1.

Evaluation of renal function

We assessed kidney damage measuring the estimated glomerular filtration rate using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI)44 equation, the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease- Isotopic Dilution Mass Spectrometry (MDRD-IDMS)45 and proteinuria, as assessed by the albumin/creatinine ratio following the criteria of the 2013 European Society of Hypertension/European Society of Cardiology Guidelines1. We considered subclinical renal damage when glomerular filtration rate was below 30–60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or microalbuminuria between 30–300 mg/24 h or albumin–creatinine ratio between 30–300 mg/g, 3.4–34 mg/mmol. We defined renal disease as a glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2, proteinuria >300 mg/24 h or albumin/creatinine ratio >300 mg/24 h1.

Evaluation of retinopathy

We evaluated retinography with a Topcon TRC NW 200 non-mydriatic retinal camera (Topcon Europe B.C., Capelle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands), obtaining nasal and temporal images centered on the disk. Images were loaded into our own developed software, AV Index calculator (Ciclorisk SL, Salamanca, Spain, registry no. 00/2011/589), which automatically estimates the mean caliber of veins and arteries in millimetres as an arteriole– venule ratio, arteriovenous index (AVIx). An AVIx of 1.0 suggests that arteriolar diameters are on average the same as venular diameters in that eye, whereas a smaller AVR suggests narrower arterioles. The pairs of main vessels in the upper and lower temporal quadrants were used, rejecting all other vessels, to improve reliability and increase efficiency of the process, analysing measures for each quadrant separately and together to estimate the mean measure in each eye.

Cardiovascular risk assessment

We estimated cardiovascular risk (CVR) of morbidity and mortality using the 2013 guidelines of the ESH1, which stratify cardiovascular risk based on blood pressure, cardiovascular risk factors, asymptomatic organ damage and presence of diabetes, symptomatic cardiovascular disease or chronic kidney disease. The classification in low, moderate, high and very high risk is retained from previews guidelines and refers to the 10-year risk of cardiovascular mortality as defined by the 2012 ESC prevention guidelines 46, based in the SCORE scale, that classifies the cardiovascular risk in low (<1%), moderate (1–5%), higher (5–10%), and very high risk (≥10%).

DNA isolation and genotyping

We extracted genomic DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes by the phenol-chloroform method47. We identified VAV2 rs602990 and VAV3 rs7528153 polymorphisms by the allelic discrimination assay with TaqMan® probes (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, California, USA) (Table 3) using specific oligonucleotides to amplify the regions containing the polymorphisms and two labelled probes with the fluorochromes VIC and FAM to detect both alleles of each polymorphism48. We performed the reaction with the Universal PCR Master Mix in the Real-Time PCR system of Step-One Plus (Applied Biosystems, Forster, California, USA). To ensure the reproducibility, a 5% of random samples were re-genotyped.

Statistical analysis

We used the statistical software SPSS v.21.0 (Armonk, New York, USA). We tested control group subjects for conformity to the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium using the chi-squared test for each polymorphism. We analysed the association between the different clinical and molecular qualitative variables by cross tabs and the Pearson X2test. The odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by a logistic regression model to evaluate the association with the risk to develop the disease. We compared quantitative variables and the influence of polymorphism distribution by the ANOVA test in those cases that followed a parametric distribution (Levene’s test for homogeneity of variances, p > 0.05). When data followed a non-parametric distribution, we applied a Mann Whitney U test. In order to consider confounding variables, we made a statistical adjustment by sex and the continuous variable of age. We considered statistically significant differences when P-value was <0.05.

Additional Information

How to cite this article: Perretta-Tejedor, N. et al. Association of VAV2 and VAV3 polymorphisms with cardiovascular risk factors. Sci. Rep. 7, 41875; doi: 10.1038/srep41875 (2017).

Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grants from Instituto de Salud Carlos III (Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, PI12/00959, PI13/01741, RETICS RD012/0005/004 and RD012/0021, co-funded by FEDER) and Junta de Castilla y León (Excellence Group GR100, Ministry of Health, BIO/SA87/13 and IES095U14) and Fundación Mutua Madrileña (IX Call for Grants and Aids for Medical Research).

Footnotes

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Author Contributions N.P.T., J.F.M., A.I.M. and F.J.L.H. performed the experimental work. L.G.O., M.A.G.M. and E.R.S. recruited the patients. J.I.R. and C.A.C. performed the antropometric measurements and the cardiovascular risk analysis. J.M.L.N., R.G.S. and C.M.S. designed the study, conceived the experiments, analysed the results and performed the statistical analysis. N.P.T. and C.M.S. wrote the manuscript. C.M.S. coordinated the study. All authors reviewed the manuscript

References

  1. Mancia G. et al. 2013 ESH/ESC Guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Journal of hypertension 31, 1281–1357, doi: 10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Vassilaki M., Linardakis M., Polk D. M. & Philalithis A. The burden of behavioral risk factors for cardiovascular disease in Europe. A significant prevention deficit. Preventive medicine 81, 326–332, doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2015.09.024 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Santulli G. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in the 21st century: updated numbers and updated facts. Journal of Cardiovascular disease 1, 1–2 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  4. Ninomiya T. et al. Albuminuria and kidney function independently predict cardiovascular and renal outcomes in diabetes. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology: JASN 20, 1813–1821, doi: 10.1681/ASN.2008121270 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Havranek E. P. et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy and cardiovascular mortality by race and ethnicity. The American journal of medicine 121, 870–875, doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2008.05.034 (2008). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Lorenz M. W., Markus H. S., Bots M. L., Rosvall M. & Sitzer M. Prediction of clinical cardiovascular events with carotid intima-media thickness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Circulation 115, 459–467, doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.628875 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Resnick H. E. et al. Relationship of high and low ankle brachial index to all-cause and cardiovascular disease mortality: the Strong Heart Study. Circulation 109, 733–739, doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000112642.63927.54 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gomez-Marcos M. A. et al. Relationship between target organ damage and blood pressure, retinal vessel calibre, oxidative stress and polymorphisms in VAV-2 and VAV-3 genes in patients with hypertension: a case-control study protocol (LOD-Hipertension). BMJ open 4, e005112, doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005112 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Tanabe Y. et al. Retinal arteriolar narrowing predicts 5-year risk of hypertension in Japanese people: the Funagata study. Microcirculation 17, 94–102, doi: 10.1111/j.1549-8719.2009.00006.x (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Tikellis G. et al. Retinal arteriolar narrowing and left ventricular hypertrophy in African Americans. the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study. American journal of hypertension 21, 352–359, doi: 10.1038/ajh.2007.57 (2008). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wong T. Y. et al. Associations between the metabolic syndrome and retinal microvascular signs: the Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities study. Investigative ophthalmology & visual science 45, 2949–2954, doi: 10.1167/iovs.04-0069 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Yatsuya H. et al. Retinal microvascular abnormalities and risk of lacunar stroke: Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Stroke; a journal of cerebral circulation 41, 1349–1355, doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.580837 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Wong T. Y. et al. Retinal arteriolar narrowing and risk of coronary heart disease in men and women. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. Jama 287, 1153–1159 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bustelo X. R. Regulatory and signaling properties of the Vav family. Molecular and cellular biology 20, 1461–1477 (2000). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Turner M. & Billadeau D. D. VAV proteins as signal integrators for multi-subunit immune-recognition receptors. Nature reviews. Immunology 2, 476–486, doi: 10.1038/nri840 (2002). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Trenkle T., McClelland M., Adlkofer K. & Welsh J. Major transcript variants of VAV3, a new member of the VAV family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors. Gene 245, 139–149 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Katzav S., Martin-Zanca D. & Barbacid M. vav, a novel human oncogene derived from a locus ubiquitously expressed in hematopoietic cells. The EMBO journal 8, 2283–2290 (1989). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Swat W. & Fujikawa K. The Vav family: at the crossroads of signaling pathways. Immunologic research 32, 259–265, doi: 10.1385/IR:32:1-3:259 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fujikawa K. et al. Vav1/2/3-null mice define an essential role for Vav family proteins in lymphocyte development and activation but a differential requirement in MAPK signaling in T and B cells. The Journal of experimental medicine 198, 1595–1608, doi: 10.1084/jem.20030874 (2003). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sauzeau V., Jerkic M., Lopez-Novoa J. M. & Bustelo X. R. Loss of Vav2 proto-oncogene causes tachycardia and cardiovascular disease in mice. Molecular biology of the cell 18, 943–952, doi: 10.1091/mbc.E06-09-0877 (2007). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Sauzeau V. et al. Vav3 proto-oncogene deficiency leads to sympathetic hyperactivity and cardiovascular dysfunction. Nature medicine 12, 841–845, doi: 10.1038/nm1426 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Menacho-Marquez M. et al. Chronic sympathoexcitation through loss of Vav3, a Rac1 activator, results in divergent effects on metabolic syndrome and obesity depending on diet. Cell metabolism 18, 199–211, doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.07.001 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Aleksic B. et al. Analysis of the VAV3 as candidate gene for schizophrenia: evidences from voxel-based morphometry and mutation screening. Schizophrenia bulletin 39, 720–728, doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbs038 (2013). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Eriksson N. et al. Novel associations for hypothyroidism include known autoimmune risk loci. PloS one 7, e34442, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034442 (2012). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fujikawa K. et al. VAV2 and VAV3 as candidate disease genes for spontaneous glaucoma in mice and humans. PloS one 5, e9050, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009050 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shi D. et al. Molecular genetic analysis of primary open-angle glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and developmental glaucoma for the VAV2 and VAV3 gene variants in Japanese subjects. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 432, 509–512, doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.02.003 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Bielecka-Dabrowa A. et al. Differences in biochemical and genetic biomarkers in patients with heart failure of various etiologies. International journal of cardiology 221, 1073–1080, doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.07.150 (2016). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Gluba A., Banach M. & Rysz J. Are polymorphisms within endothelial nitric oxide synthase good predictors of coronary artery disease? Cardiology 116, 268–270, doi: 10.1159/000319458 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Gluba A., Pietrucha T., Banach M., Piotrowski G. & Rysz J. The role of polymorphisms within paraoxonases (192 Gln/Arg in PON1 and 311Ser/Cys in PON2) in the modulation of cardiovascular risk: a pilot study. Angiology 61, 157–165, doi: 10.1177/0003319709351258 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Gluba A., Banach M., Mikhailidis D. P. & Rysz J. Genetic determinants of cardiovascular disease: the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, paraoxonases, endothelin-1, nitric oxide synthase and adrenergic receptors. In Vivo 23, 797–812 (2009). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fischer K. D., Tedford K. & Penninger J. M. Vav links antigen-receptor signaling to the actin cytoskeleton. Seminars in immunology 10, 317–327, doi: 10.1006/smim.1998.0124 (1998). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Guyenet P. G. The sympathetic control of blood pressure. Nature reviews. Neuroscience 7, 335–346, doi: 10.1038/nrn1902 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Sauzeau V. et al. Vav3 is involved in GABAergic axon guidance events important for the proper function of brainstem neurons controlling cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal parameters. Molecular biology of the cell 21, 4251–4263, doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-07-0639 (2010). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Govek E. E., Newey S. E. & Van Aelst L. The role of the Rho GTPases in neuronal development. Genes & development 19, 1–49, doi: 10.1101/gad.1256405 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Sha J. et al. Vav3, a GEF for RhoA, Plays a Critical Role under High Glucose Conditions. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) 29, 363–370, doi: 10.3803/EnM.2014.29.3.363 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rahimi M. et al. Age-related obesity and type 2 diabetes dysregulate neuronal associated genes and proteins in humans. Oncotarget 6, 29818–29832, doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4904 (2015). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Hale C. F. et al. Essential role for vav Guanine nucleotide exchange factors in brain-derived neurotrophic factor-induced dendritic spine growth and synapse plasticity. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience 31, 12426–12436, doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0685-11.2011 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Cowan C. W. et al. Vav family GEFs link activated Ephs to endocytosis and axon guidance. Neuron 46, 205–217, doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.03.019 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Rahman A. et al. The small GTPase Rac1 is required for smooth muscle contraction. The Journal of physiology 592, 915–926, doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.262998 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Hassanain H. H. et al. Hypertension caused by transgenic overexpression of Rac1. Antioxidants & redox signaling 9, 91–100, doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.9.91 (2007). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Hornstein I., Alcover A. & Katzav S. Vav proteins, masters of the world of cytoskeleton organization. Cellular signalling 16, 1–11 (2004). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Okin P. M., Roman M. J., Devereux R. B. & Kligfield P. Electrocardiographic identification of increased left ventricular mass by simple voltage-duration products. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 25, 417–423 (1995). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Gomez-Marcos M. A. et al. Protocol for measuring carotid intima-media thickness that best correlates with cardiovascular risk and target organ damage. American journal of hypertension 25, 955–961, doi: 10.1038/ajh.2012.72 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Levey A. S. et al. A new equation to estimate glomerular filtration rate. Annals of internal medicine 150, 604–612 (2009). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Levey A. S. et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Annals of internal medicine 130, 461–470 (1999). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Perk J. et al. European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (version 2012). The Fifth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts). European heart journal 33, 1635–1701, doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs092 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Gomez-Sanchez J. C. et al. The human Tp53 Arg72Pro polymorphism explains different functional prognosis in stroke. The Journal of experimental medicine 208, 429–437, doi: 10.1084/jem.20101523 (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schleinitz D., Distefano J. K. & Kovacs P. Targeted SNP genotyping using the TaqMan(R) assay. Methods Mol Biol 700, 77–87, doi: 10.1007/978-1-61737-954-3_6 (2011). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES